Posts

Jeff Van Drew

This is a Dutch name; the family name is Van Drew , not Drew . Jeff Van Drew Member of the U.S. House of Representatives from New Jersey's 2nd district Incumbent Assumed office January 3, 2019 Preceded by Frank LoBiondo Member of the New Jersey Senate from the 1st district In office January 8, 2008 – December 31, 2018 Preceded by Nicholas Asselta Succeeded by Bob Andrzejczak Member of the New Jersey General Assembly from the 1st district In office January 8, 2002 – January 8, 2008 Preceded by John C. Gibson Succeeded by Matthew W. Milam Personal details Born ( 1953-02-23 ) February 23, 1953 (age 65) New York City, New York, U.S. Political party Democratic Spouse(s) Ricarda Van Drew Education Rutgers University, New Brunswick (BS) Fairleigh Dickinson University (DMD) Website House website Jefferson H. Van Drew [1] (born February 23, 1953) is an American politician serving as the U.S. Representative for New Jersey...

高拱

Image
高拱 大明吏部尚書中極殿大學士 籍貫 河南新鄭縣 族裔 漢族 字號 字肅卿,號中玄 諡號 文襄 出生 正德七年十二月十三 (1513年1月19日) 河南新鄭縣 逝世 萬曆六年七月二日 (1578年8月4日) 河南新鄭縣 親屬 (祖父)高魁、(父)高尚賢 出身 嘉靖二十年辛丑科進士出身 高拱 (1513年1月19日-1578年8月4日),字 肅卿 ,號 中玄 ,河南新鄭縣人,祖籍山西洪洞縣,明朝政治人物,官至吏部尚书、中极殿大学士,為內閣首輔。 目录 1 生平 2 政绩 3 与张居正的政争 4 學術思想 5 注釋 6 相關條目 生平 先世避元末乱迁徙新郑。曾祖父高旺,祖父高魁,為成化二十二年(1486年)舉人,官至工部虞衡司郎中。父高尚贤,為嘉靖二十年(1541年)进士,官至光禄寺少卿。高拱幼聰穎,“五岁善对偶,八岁诵千言”。嘉靖二十年(1541年)進士,選庶吉士,一年後授翰林院編修。穆宗为裕王时,任侍讲学士,在裕邸九年全力维护裕王地位,君臣形同密友。嘉靖四十五年(1565年)因首輔徐階推荐,拜文淵閣大學士。然性情高傲,“性迫急,不能容物,又不能藏蓄需忍,有所忤触之立碎。每张目怒视,恶声继之,即左右皆为之辟易”,與徐階相抗,竟至相互攻訐,後為胡应嘉、欧阳一敬所逼退。隆慶二年(1568年)七月,徐阶退休歸鄉,隔年冬天,张居正与李芳等奏请复起高拱,以内阁兼吏部尚书领吏部事,盡改徐階舊制,“授诸司以籍,使署贤否,志爵里姓氏”,有官员被黜,高拱必亲“告以故”,黜者“无不慑服”。 政绩 隆慶四年(1570年)俺答汗之孫把汗那吉來降,高拱和张居正采纳宣大总督王崇古建议,先授予其指揮使官銜,乘机与俺答达成封贡互市协议,史稱俺答封貢。又推荐殷正茂为总督平定雲南苗變,推荐潘季驯治理黄河。改兵部一尚书二侍郎制为一尚书四侍郎制,侍郎們分工。 与张居正的政争 高拱與張居正供职时国子监相识,二人志趣相投,相期将来入內阁匡扶社稷。但当明世宗去世当天,当时的內閣首辅徐阶只召自己门生张居正共同写就嘉靖遗诏,并未通知已是阁臣的对手高拱,二人顿生龃龉。此外,在隆庆五年(157...

How does Angular's bypassSecurityTrustHtml pipe work under the hood?

Image
0 I've used variations of SafeHtml pipe, but I'm wondering how it actually works under the hood. How does Angular know that the text being applied to the DOM has been passed through a pipe and is safe? Is it simply done at the compilation stage or is it a run-time check? The documentation says: Calling any of the bypassSecurityTrust... APIs disables Angular's built-in sanitization for the value passed in Common implementation of a safe HTML pipe: import { Pipe, PipeTransform } from '@angular/core'; import { DomSanitizer, SafeHtml } from '@angular/platform-browser'; @Pipe({name: 'sanitizeHtml'}) export class SanitizeHtmlPipe implements PipeTransform { constructor(private _sanitizer:DomSanitizer) { } transform(v:string):SafeHtml { return this._sani...