Help to understand the use of 'but' in this sentence












7















They had the bodies, hind legs and tails of horses, but the front legs, wings and heads of what seemed to be giant eagles, with cruel, steel-coloured beaks and large, brilliantly orange eyes.




I don't know why 'but' is used in this sentence. It seems to me that it could be either a conj. or prep. What's 'but' doing there? Will it change the meaning of the sentence?



-- From Harry Potter.










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    I wish to add this: I am a native speaker, but I had a bit of difficulty parsing this sentence at first reading. I would have preferred "They had the bodies, hind legs and tails of horses; but the front legs, wings and heads were those of giant eagles, with cruel, steel-coloured beaks and large, brilliantly orange eyes."
    – trlkly
    Nov 16 '18 at 1:26
















7















They had the bodies, hind legs and tails of horses, but the front legs, wings and heads of what seemed to be giant eagles, with cruel, steel-coloured beaks and large, brilliantly orange eyes.




I don't know why 'but' is used in this sentence. It seems to me that it could be either a conj. or prep. What's 'but' doing there? Will it change the meaning of the sentence?



-- From Harry Potter.










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    I wish to add this: I am a native speaker, but I had a bit of difficulty parsing this sentence at first reading. I would have preferred "They had the bodies, hind legs and tails of horses; but the front legs, wings and heads were those of giant eagles, with cruel, steel-coloured beaks and large, brilliantly orange eyes."
    – trlkly
    Nov 16 '18 at 1:26














7












7








7


2






They had the bodies, hind legs and tails of horses, but the front legs, wings and heads of what seemed to be giant eagles, with cruel, steel-coloured beaks and large, brilliantly orange eyes.




I don't know why 'but' is used in this sentence. It seems to me that it could be either a conj. or prep. What's 'but' doing there? Will it change the meaning of the sentence?



-- From Harry Potter.










share|improve this question














They had the bodies, hind legs and tails of horses, but the front legs, wings and heads of what seemed to be giant eagles, with cruel, steel-coloured beaks and large, brilliantly orange eyes.




I don't know why 'but' is used in this sentence. It seems to me that it could be either a conj. or prep. What's 'but' doing there? Will it change the meaning of the sentence?



-- From Harry Potter.







word-usage meaning-in-context word-meaning






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 15 '18 at 11:54









dandan

4,80522570




4,80522570








  • 1




    I wish to add this: I am a native speaker, but I had a bit of difficulty parsing this sentence at first reading. I would have preferred "They had the bodies, hind legs and tails of horses; but the front legs, wings and heads were those of giant eagles, with cruel, steel-coloured beaks and large, brilliantly orange eyes."
    – trlkly
    Nov 16 '18 at 1:26














  • 1




    I wish to add this: I am a native speaker, but I had a bit of difficulty parsing this sentence at first reading. I would have preferred "They had the bodies, hind legs and tails of horses; but the front legs, wings and heads were those of giant eagles, with cruel, steel-coloured beaks and large, brilliantly orange eyes."
    – trlkly
    Nov 16 '18 at 1:26








1




1




I wish to add this: I am a native speaker, but I had a bit of difficulty parsing this sentence at first reading. I would have preferred "They had the bodies, hind legs and tails of horses; but the front legs, wings and heads were those of giant eagles, with cruel, steel-coloured beaks and large, brilliantly orange eyes."
– trlkly
Nov 16 '18 at 1:26




I wish to add this: I am a native speaker, but I had a bit of difficulty parsing this sentence at first reading. I would have preferred "They had the bodies, hind legs and tails of horses; but the front legs, wings and heads were those of giant eagles, with cruel, steel-coloured beaks and large, brilliantly orange eyes."
– trlkly
Nov 16 '18 at 1:26










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















19














I agree with Michael Rybkin. I think that "but" is used as conjuction there.



At least according to the meaning established in the Oxford Dictionary



but [conjuction]




Used to introduce a phrase or clause contrasting with what has already been mentioned.
‘he stumbled but didn't fall’
‘this is one principle, but it is not
the only one’
the food is cheap but delicious
‘the problem is not
that they are cutting down trees, but that they are doing it in a
predatory way’




contrast




The state of being strikingly different from something else in
juxtaposition or close association.




Some parts [horse-like] are strikingly different from the other parts [eagle-like].



I have highlighted an specific example above where you can observe that the verb is used only once, the ellipsis mentioned by @Tᴚoɯɐuo




The food is cheap but delicious.



The food is cheap but (it's) delicious.




You got the same case in your example. Let's simplify




They had horse-like bodies but eagle-like heads.



They had horse-like bodies but (they had) eagle-like heads.







share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    Right, I meant "conjunction". I don't know why I wrote "preposition". I was focused more on the semantics. I thought that if the OP understood what the sentence was saying, it wouldn't really matter whether but was used as a conjunction or preposition. Thanks for alerting me to this.
    – Michael Rybkin
    Nov 15 '18 at 12:22








  • 1




    @MichaelRybkin Ok, then I meant "agree" :-)
    – RubioRic
    Nov 15 '18 at 12:24






  • 2




    You could replace 'but' with 'and' here and it wouldn't change the meaning.
    – JimmyJames
    Nov 15 '18 at 21:29






  • 1




    @JimmyJames not quite. Using 'but' gives the reader an expectation that something unusual is coming, while using 'and' makes it a straight up description. It's essentially stylistic, but 'but' does make a difference.
    – mcalex
    Nov 16 '18 at 5:24










  • @mcalex I didn't say it was exactly the same in every way. Semantically, it doesn't change the meaning of the sentence. It's like 'too' versus 'also, style and feeling are different but not meaning. A counter example is that the 'but' in "all but one" cannot be replaced with 'and' without changing the meaning.
    – JimmyJames
    Nov 16 '18 at 15:19



















5















It had the head of a man but (had) the body of a lion.




It is a kind of ellipsis, I think. Perhaps there is a narrower technical term for it. The verb had is understood to govern both objects, the head of a man and the body of a lion.



So that but there joins two clauses in one of which the verb is merely understood to be present.






share|improve this answer































    5














    Do you think you will better understand it if I restructure your quote like this:




    Question: They had the bodies, hind legs and tails of what?
    Answer: Of horses.
    Question: But what did they have the front legs, wings and heads of?
    Answer: Of what seemed to be giant eagles, with cruel, steel-coloured beaks and large, brilliantly orange eyes.




    Thus, technically speaking, but as used in your passage is a conjunction. It's making a contrast between different body parts that the creatures they're talking about have. The body parts that are listed at the beginning are those of horses, but the body parts which are listed later are like those that giant eagles have.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      Oh, it's an interesting use! I think I get it. Are you saying: they had bodies (of horses), hind legs(of horses) and tails of horses, but had the front legs(of xxx giant eagles), wings(xxx giant eagles) and heads of xxx giant eagles?
      – dan
      Nov 15 '18 at 12:08






    • 1




      Exactly. The body parts that are listed at the beginning are those of horses, but the body parts that are listed later are like those that giant eagles have.
      – Michael Rybkin
      Nov 15 '18 at 12:11













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "481"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f185692%2fhelp-to-understand-the-use-of-but-in-this-sentence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    19














    I agree with Michael Rybkin. I think that "but" is used as conjuction there.



    At least according to the meaning established in the Oxford Dictionary



    but [conjuction]




    Used to introduce a phrase or clause contrasting with what has already been mentioned.
    ‘he stumbled but didn't fall’
    ‘this is one principle, but it is not
    the only one’
    the food is cheap but delicious
    ‘the problem is not
    that they are cutting down trees, but that they are doing it in a
    predatory way’




    contrast




    The state of being strikingly different from something else in
    juxtaposition or close association.




    Some parts [horse-like] are strikingly different from the other parts [eagle-like].



    I have highlighted an specific example above where you can observe that the verb is used only once, the ellipsis mentioned by @Tᴚoɯɐuo




    The food is cheap but delicious.



    The food is cheap but (it's) delicious.




    You got the same case in your example. Let's simplify




    They had horse-like bodies but eagle-like heads.



    They had horse-like bodies but (they had) eagle-like heads.







    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      Right, I meant "conjunction". I don't know why I wrote "preposition". I was focused more on the semantics. I thought that if the OP understood what the sentence was saying, it wouldn't really matter whether but was used as a conjunction or preposition. Thanks for alerting me to this.
      – Michael Rybkin
      Nov 15 '18 at 12:22








    • 1




      @MichaelRybkin Ok, then I meant "agree" :-)
      – RubioRic
      Nov 15 '18 at 12:24






    • 2




      You could replace 'but' with 'and' here and it wouldn't change the meaning.
      – JimmyJames
      Nov 15 '18 at 21:29






    • 1




      @JimmyJames not quite. Using 'but' gives the reader an expectation that something unusual is coming, while using 'and' makes it a straight up description. It's essentially stylistic, but 'but' does make a difference.
      – mcalex
      Nov 16 '18 at 5:24










    • @mcalex I didn't say it was exactly the same in every way. Semantically, it doesn't change the meaning of the sentence. It's like 'too' versus 'also, style and feeling are different but not meaning. A counter example is that the 'but' in "all but one" cannot be replaced with 'and' without changing the meaning.
      – JimmyJames
      Nov 16 '18 at 15:19
















    19














    I agree with Michael Rybkin. I think that "but" is used as conjuction there.



    At least according to the meaning established in the Oxford Dictionary



    but [conjuction]




    Used to introduce a phrase or clause contrasting with what has already been mentioned.
    ‘he stumbled but didn't fall’
    ‘this is one principle, but it is not
    the only one’
    the food is cheap but delicious
    ‘the problem is not
    that they are cutting down trees, but that they are doing it in a
    predatory way’




    contrast




    The state of being strikingly different from something else in
    juxtaposition or close association.




    Some parts [horse-like] are strikingly different from the other parts [eagle-like].



    I have highlighted an specific example above where you can observe that the verb is used only once, the ellipsis mentioned by @Tᴚoɯɐuo




    The food is cheap but delicious.



    The food is cheap but (it's) delicious.




    You got the same case in your example. Let's simplify




    They had horse-like bodies but eagle-like heads.



    They had horse-like bodies but (they had) eagle-like heads.







    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      Right, I meant "conjunction". I don't know why I wrote "preposition". I was focused more on the semantics. I thought that if the OP understood what the sentence was saying, it wouldn't really matter whether but was used as a conjunction or preposition. Thanks for alerting me to this.
      – Michael Rybkin
      Nov 15 '18 at 12:22








    • 1




      @MichaelRybkin Ok, then I meant "agree" :-)
      – RubioRic
      Nov 15 '18 at 12:24






    • 2




      You could replace 'but' with 'and' here and it wouldn't change the meaning.
      – JimmyJames
      Nov 15 '18 at 21:29






    • 1




      @JimmyJames not quite. Using 'but' gives the reader an expectation that something unusual is coming, while using 'and' makes it a straight up description. It's essentially stylistic, but 'but' does make a difference.
      – mcalex
      Nov 16 '18 at 5:24










    • @mcalex I didn't say it was exactly the same in every way. Semantically, it doesn't change the meaning of the sentence. It's like 'too' versus 'also, style and feeling are different but not meaning. A counter example is that the 'but' in "all but one" cannot be replaced with 'and' without changing the meaning.
      – JimmyJames
      Nov 16 '18 at 15:19














    19












    19








    19






    I agree with Michael Rybkin. I think that "but" is used as conjuction there.



    At least according to the meaning established in the Oxford Dictionary



    but [conjuction]




    Used to introduce a phrase or clause contrasting with what has already been mentioned.
    ‘he stumbled but didn't fall’
    ‘this is one principle, but it is not
    the only one’
    the food is cheap but delicious
    ‘the problem is not
    that they are cutting down trees, but that they are doing it in a
    predatory way’




    contrast




    The state of being strikingly different from something else in
    juxtaposition or close association.




    Some parts [horse-like] are strikingly different from the other parts [eagle-like].



    I have highlighted an specific example above where you can observe that the verb is used only once, the ellipsis mentioned by @Tᴚoɯɐuo




    The food is cheap but delicious.



    The food is cheap but (it's) delicious.




    You got the same case in your example. Let's simplify




    They had horse-like bodies but eagle-like heads.



    They had horse-like bodies but (they had) eagle-like heads.







    share|improve this answer














    I agree with Michael Rybkin. I think that "but" is used as conjuction there.



    At least according to the meaning established in the Oxford Dictionary



    but [conjuction]




    Used to introduce a phrase or clause contrasting with what has already been mentioned.
    ‘he stumbled but didn't fall’
    ‘this is one principle, but it is not
    the only one’
    the food is cheap but delicious
    ‘the problem is not
    that they are cutting down trees, but that they are doing it in a
    predatory way’




    contrast




    The state of being strikingly different from something else in
    juxtaposition or close association.




    Some parts [horse-like] are strikingly different from the other parts [eagle-like].



    I have highlighted an specific example above where you can observe that the verb is used only once, the ellipsis mentioned by @Tᴚoɯɐuo




    The food is cheap but delicious.



    The food is cheap but (it's) delicious.




    You got the same case in your example. Let's simplify




    They had horse-like bodies but eagle-like heads.



    They had horse-like bodies but (they had) eagle-like heads.








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 15 '18 at 15:58

























    answered Nov 15 '18 at 12:19









    RubioRicRubioRic

    4,0821931




    4,0821931








    • 1




      Right, I meant "conjunction". I don't know why I wrote "preposition". I was focused more on the semantics. I thought that if the OP understood what the sentence was saying, it wouldn't really matter whether but was used as a conjunction or preposition. Thanks for alerting me to this.
      – Michael Rybkin
      Nov 15 '18 at 12:22








    • 1




      @MichaelRybkin Ok, then I meant "agree" :-)
      – RubioRic
      Nov 15 '18 at 12:24






    • 2




      You could replace 'but' with 'and' here and it wouldn't change the meaning.
      – JimmyJames
      Nov 15 '18 at 21:29






    • 1




      @JimmyJames not quite. Using 'but' gives the reader an expectation that something unusual is coming, while using 'and' makes it a straight up description. It's essentially stylistic, but 'but' does make a difference.
      – mcalex
      Nov 16 '18 at 5:24










    • @mcalex I didn't say it was exactly the same in every way. Semantically, it doesn't change the meaning of the sentence. It's like 'too' versus 'also, style and feeling are different but not meaning. A counter example is that the 'but' in "all but one" cannot be replaced with 'and' without changing the meaning.
      – JimmyJames
      Nov 16 '18 at 15:19














    • 1




      Right, I meant "conjunction". I don't know why I wrote "preposition". I was focused more on the semantics. I thought that if the OP understood what the sentence was saying, it wouldn't really matter whether but was used as a conjunction or preposition. Thanks for alerting me to this.
      – Michael Rybkin
      Nov 15 '18 at 12:22








    • 1




      @MichaelRybkin Ok, then I meant "agree" :-)
      – RubioRic
      Nov 15 '18 at 12:24






    • 2




      You could replace 'but' with 'and' here and it wouldn't change the meaning.
      – JimmyJames
      Nov 15 '18 at 21:29






    • 1




      @JimmyJames not quite. Using 'but' gives the reader an expectation that something unusual is coming, while using 'and' makes it a straight up description. It's essentially stylistic, but 'but' does make a difference.
      – mcalex
      Nov 16 '18 at 5:24










    • @mcalex I didn't say it was exactly the same in every way. Semantically, it doesn't change the meaning of the sentence. It's like 'too' versus 'also, style and feeling are different but not meaning. A counter example is that the 'but' in "all but one" cannot be replaced with 'and' without changing the meaning.
      – JimmyJames
      Nov 16 '18 at 15:19








    1




    1




    Right, I meant "conjunction". I don't know why I wrote "preposition". I was focused more on the semantics. I thought that if the OP understood what the sentence was saying, it wouldn't really matter whether but was used as a conjunction or preposition. Thanks for alerting me to this.
    – Michael Rybkin
    Nov 15 '18 at 12:22






    Right, I meant "conjunction". I don't know why I wrote "preposition". I was focused more on the semantics. I thought that if the OP understood what the sentence was saying, it wouldn't really matter whether but was used as a conjunction or preposition. Thanks for alerting me to this.
    – Michael Rybkin
    Nov 15 '18 at 12:22






    1




    1




    @MichaelRybkin Ok, then I meant "agree" :-)
    – RubioRic
    Nov 15 '18 at 12:24




    @MichaelRybkin Ok, then I meant "agree" :-)
    – RubioRic
    Nov 15 '18 at 12:24




    2




    2




    You could replace 'but' with 'and' here and it wouldn't change the meaning.
    – JimmyJames
    Nov 15 '18 at 21:29




    You could replace 'but' with 'and' here and it wouldn't change the meaning.
    – JimmyJames
    Nov 15 '18 at 21:29




    1




    1




    @JimmyJames not quite. Using 'but' gives the reader an expectation that something unusual is coming, while using 'and' makes it a straight up description. It's essentially stylistic, but 'but' does make a difference.
    – mcalex
    Nov 16 '18 at 5:24




    @JimmyJames not quite. Using 'but' gives the reader an expectation that something unusual is coming, while using 'and' makes it a straight up description. It's essentially stylistic, but 'but' does make a difference.
    – mcalex
    Nov 16 '18 at 5:24












    @mcalex I didn't say it was exactly the same in every way. Semantically, it doesn't change the meaning of the sentence. It's like 'too' versus 'also, style and feeling are different but not meaning. A counter example is that the 'but' in "all but one" cannot be replaced with 'and' without changing the meaning.
    – JimmyJames
    Nov 16 '18 at 15:19




    @mcalex I didn't say it was exactly the same in every way. Semantically, it doesn't change the meaning of the sentence. It's like 'too' versus 'also, style and feeling are different but not meaning. A counter example is that the 'but' in "all but one" cannot be replaced with 'and' without changing the meaning.
    – JimmyJames
    Nov 16 '18 at 15:19













    5















    It had the head of a man but (had) the body of a lion.




    It is a kind of ellipsis, I think. Perhaps there is a narrower technical term for it. The verb had is understood to govern both objects, the head of a man and the body of a lion.



    So that but there joins two clauses in one of which the verb is merely understood to be present.






    share|improve this answer




























      5















      It had the head of a man but (had) the body of a lion.




      It is a kind of ellipsis, I think. Perhaps there is a narrower technical term for it. The verb had is understood to govern both objects, the head of a man and the body of a lion.



      So that but there joins two clauses in one of which the verb is merely understood to be present.






      share|improve this answer


























        5












        5








        5







        It had the head of a man but (had) the body of a lion.




        It is a kind of ellipsis, I think. Perhaps there is a narrower technical term for it. The verb had is understood to govern both objects, the head of a man and the body of a lion.



        So that but there joins two clauses in one of which the verb is merely understood to be present.






        share|improve this answer















        It had the head of a man but (had) the body of a lion.




        It is a kind of ellipsis, I think. Perhaps there is a narrower technical term for it. The verb had is understood to govern both objects, the head of a man and the body of a lion.



        So that but there joins two clauses in one of which the verb is merely understood to be present.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 15 '18 at 12:42

























        answered Nov 15 '18 at 12:34









        TᴚoɯɐuoTᴚoɯɐuo

        110k683177




        110k683177























            5














            Do you think you will better understand it if I restructure your quote like this:




            Question: They had the bodies, hind legs and tails of what?
            Answer: Of horses.
            Question: But what did they have the front legs, wings and heads of?
            Answer: Of what seemed to be giant eagles, with cruel, steel-coloured beaks and large, brilliantly orange eyes.




            Thus, technically speaking, but as used in your passage is a conjunction. It's making a contrast between different body parts that the creatures they're talking about have. The body parts that are listed at the beginning are those of horses, but the body parts which are listed later are like those that giant eagles have.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1




              Oh, it's an interesting use! I think I get it. Are you saying: they had bodies (of horses), hind legs(of horses) and tails of horses, but had the front legs(of xxx giant eagles), wings(xxx giant eagles) and heads of xxx giant eagles?
              – dan
              Nov 15 '18 at 12:08






            • 1




              Exactly. The body parts that are listed at the beginning are those of horses, but the body parts that are listed later are like those that giant eagles have.
              – Michael Rybkin
              Nov 15 '18 at 12:11


















            5














            Do you think you will better understand it if I restructure your quote like this:




            Question: They had the bodies, hind legs and tails of what?
            Answer: Of horses.
            Question: But what did they have the front legs, wings and heads of?
            Answer: Of what seemed to be giant eagles, with cruel, steel-coloured beaks and large, brilliantly orange eyes.




            Thus, technically speaking, but as used in your passage is a conjunction. It's making a contrast between different body parts that the creatures they're talking about have. The body parts that are listed at the beginning are those of horses, but the body parts which are listed later are like those that giant eagles have.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1




              Oh, it's an interesting use! I think I get it. Are you saying: they had bodies (of horses), hind legs(of horses) and tails of horses, but had the front legs(of xxx giant eagles), wings(xxx giant eagles) and heads of xxx giant eagles?
              – dan
              Nov 15 '18 at 12:08






            • 1




              Exactly. The body parts that are listed at the beginning are those of horses, but the body parts that are listed later are like those that giant eagles have.
              – Michael Rybkin
              Nov 15 '18 at 12:11
















            5












            5








            5






            Do you think you will better understand it if I restructure your quote like this:




            Question: They had the bodies, hind legs and tails of what?
            Answer: Of horses.
            Question: But what did they have the front legs, wings and heads of?
            Answer: Of what seemed to be giant eagles, with cruel, steel-coloured beaks and large, brilliantly orange eyes.




            Thus, technically speaking, but as used in your passage is a conjunction. It's making a contrast between different body parts that the creatures they're talking about have. The body parts that are listed at the beginning are those of horses, but the body parts which are listed later are like those that giant eagles have.






            share|improve this answer














            Do you think you will better understand it if I restructure your quote like this:




            Question: They had the bodies, hind legs and tails of what?
            Answer: Of horses.
            Question: But what did they have the front legs, wings and heads of?
            Answer: Of what seemed to be giant eagles, with cruel, steel-coloured beaks and large, brilliantly orange eyes.




            Thus, technically speaking, but as used in your passage is a conjunction. It's making a contrast between different body parts that the creatures they're talking about have. The body parts that are listed at the beginning are those of horses, but the body parts which are listed later are like those that giant eagles have.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Nov 15 '18 at 13:09

























            answered Nov 15 '18 at 12:00









            Michael RybkinMichael Rybkin

            26.4k10105229




            26.4k10105229








            • 1




              Oh, it's an interesting use! I think I get it. Are you saying: they had bodies (of horses), hind legs(of horses) and tails of horses, but had the front legs(of xxx giant eagles), wings(xxx giant eagles) and heads of xxx giant eagles?
              – dan
              Nov 15 '18 at 12:08






            • 1




              Exactly. The body parts that are listed at the beginning are those of horses, but the body parts that are listed later are like those that giant eagles have.
              – Michael Rybkin
              Nov 15 '18 at 12:11
















            • 1




              Oh, it's an interesting use! I think I get it. Are you saying: they had bodies (of horses), hind legs(of horses) and tails of horses, but had the front legs(of xxx giant eagles), wings(xxx giant eagles) and heads of xxx giant eagles?
              – dan
              Nov 15 '18 at 12:08






            • 1




              Exactly. The body parts that are listed at the beginning are those of horses, but the body parts that are listed later are like those that giant eagles have.
              – Michael Rybkin
              Nov 15 '18 at 12:11










            1




            1




            Oh, it's an interesting use! I think I get it. Are you saying: they had bodies (of horses), hind legs(of horses) and tails of horses, but had the front legs(of xxx giant eagles), wings(xxx giant eagles) and heads of xxx giant eagles?
            – dan
            Nov 15 '18 at 12:08




            Oh, it's an interesting use! I think I get it. Are you saying: they had bodies (of horses), hind legs(of horses) and tails of horses, but had the front legs(of xxx giant eagles), wings(xxx giant eagles) and heads of xxx giant eagles?
            – dan
            Nov 15 '18 at 12:08




            1




            1




            Exactly. The body parts that are listed at the beginning are those of horses, but the body parts that are listed later are like those that giant eagles have.
            – Michael Rybkin
            Nov 15 '18 at 12:11






            Exactly. The body parts that are listed at the beginning are those of horses, but the body parts that are listed later are like those that giant eagles have.
            – Michael Rybkin
            Nov 15 '18 at 12:11




















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f185692%2fhelp-to-understand-the-use-of-but-in-this-sentence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Guess what letter conforming each word

            Port of Spain

            Run scheduled task as local user group (not BUILTIN)