Running / executing Maven project quickly at the command line
Looking at the Maven instructions:
https://maven.apache.org/guides/getting-started/maven-in-five-minutes.html
it says to build the target files with:
mvn package
and then to run the project, do:
java -cp target/my-app-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar com.mycompany.app.App
my question is - is there not a way to quickly run the project with something like:
mvn run mycompany.app
or something like that? If we use a convention or configuration, shouldn't there be some way to use mvn
to run the project? O/w, I will just create a bash script to do the jar command, because that is way too much to type out every time!
maven
add a comment |
Looking at the Maven instructions:
https://maven.apache.org/guides/getting-started/maven-in-five-minutes.html
it says to build the target files with:
mvn package
and then to run the project, do:
java -cp target/my-app-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar com.mycompany.app.App
my question is - is there not a way to quickly run the project with something like:
mvn run mycompany.app
or something like that? If we use a convention or configuration, shouldn't there be some way to use mvn
to run the project? O/w, I will just create a bash script to do the jar command, because that is way too much to type out every time!
maven
add a comment |
Looking at the Maven instructions:
https://maven.apache.org/guides/getting-started/maven-in-five-minutes.html
it says to build the target files with:
mvn package
and then to run the project, do:
java -cp target/my-app-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar com.mycompany.app.App
my question is - is there not a way to quickly run the project with something like:
mvn run mycompany.app
or something like that? If we use a convention or configuration, shouldn't there be some way to use mvn
to run the project? O/w, I will just create a bash script to do the jar command, because that is way too much to type out every time!
maven
Looking at the Maven instructions:
https://maven.apache.org/guides/getting-started/maven-in-five-minutes.html
it says to build the target files with:
mvn package
and then to run the project, do:
java -cp target/my-app-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar com.mycompany.app.App
my question is - is there not a way to quickly run the project with something like:
mvn run mycompany.app
or something like that? If we use a convention or configuration, shouldn't there be some way to use mvn
to run the project? O/w, I will just create a bash script to do the jar command, because that is way too much to type out every time!
maven
maven
edited Nov 20 '18 at 22:37
MrCholo
asked Nov 20 '18 at 21:49
MrCholoMrCholo
1,517933
1,517933
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
To run a Maven project, you would use something like this at the command line:
mvn exec:java -Dexec.mainClass="suman.App"
I would guess that exec:java could be a default, and that -Dexec.mainClass could also be a default, thus there is probably some way to run it like so:
mvn exec "suman.App"
but that is just a guess.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53402109%2frunning-executing-maven-project-quickly-at-the-command-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
To run a Maven project, you would use something like this at the command line:
mvn exec:java -Dexec.mainClass="suman.App"
I would guess that exec:java could be a default, and that -Dexec.mainClass could also be a default, thus there is probably some way to run it like so:
mvn exec "suman.App"
but that is just a guess.
add a comment |
To run a Maven project, you would use something like this at the command line:
mvn exec:java -Dexec.mainClass="suman.App"
I would guess that exec:java could be a default, and that -Dexec.mainClass could also be a default, thus there is probably some way to run it like so:
mvn exec "suman.App"
but that is just a guess.
add a comment |
To run a Maven project, you would use something like this at the command line:
mvn exec:java -Dexec.mainClass="suman.App"
I would guess that exec:java could be a default, and that -Dexec.mainClass could also be a default, thus there is probably some way to run it like so:
mvn exec "suman.App"
but that is just a guess.
To run a Maven project, you would use something like this at the command line:
mvn exec:java -Dexec.mainClass="suman.App"
I would guess that exec:java could be a default, and that -Dexec.mainClass could also be a default, thus there is probably some way to run it like so:
mvn exec "suman.App"
but that is just a guess.
answered Nov 20 '18 at 22:36
rakimrakim
416211
416211
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53402109%2frunning-executing-maven-project-quickly-at-the-command-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown