detach disk from vm azure c#

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}

the point is, i have to detach a disk in azure, using c# and the resourcemanager provided by azure.

atm i have following...

  var computeClient = new ComputeManagementClient(credentials) { SubscriptionId = credentials.DefaultSubscriptionId };

  var ObjVirtualMachines = computeClient.VirtualMachines.GetAsync(ressgroup, virtualmname, null, new System.Threading.CancellationToken()).Result;

  var disk = new DataDisk(ObjVirtualMachines.StorageProfile.DataDisks.Count,

  DiskCreateOptionTypes.Empty,

  name,

  null,

  null,

  null,

  null,

  new ManagedDiskParametersInner(resourceid, acctype));

  var newUpdateVM = computeClient.VirtualMachines.CreateOrUpdateAsync(ressgroup, virtualmname, ObjVirtualMachines);

I didn't get it. Its primary used to attach a disk, with different parameters. There is no deattach function, so i tried, setting it to Empty. But that wont work either.

I also experimented with the disk itself. But i have to detach the disk from it, so working on the disk alone will not reach to the goal.

Any Ideas how to solve this problem ?

asked Nov 22 '18 at 14:33

Glowhollow

7510

add a comment |

the point is, i have to detach a disk in azure, using c# and the resourcemanager provided by azure.

atm i have following...

  var computeClient = new ComputeManagementClient(credentials) { SubscriptionId = credentials.DefaultSubscriptionId };

  var ObjVirtualMachines = computeClient.VirtualMachines.GetAsync(ressgroup, virtualmname, null, new System.Threading.CancellationToken()).Result;

  var disk = new DataDisk(ObjVirtualMachines.StorageProfile.DataDisks.Count,

  DiskCreateOptionTypes.Empty,

  name,

  null,

  null,

  null,

  null,

  new ManagedDiskParametersInner(resourceid, acctype));

  var newUpdateVM = computeClient.VirtualMachines.CreateOrUpdateAsync(ressgroup, virtualmname, ObjVirtualMachines);

I didn't get it. Its primary used to attach a disk, with different parameters. There is no deattach function, so i tried, setting it to Empty. But that wont work either.

I also experimented with the disk itself. But i have to detach the disk from it, so working on the disk alone will not reach to the goal.

Any Ideas how to solve this problem ?

asked Nov 22 '18 at 14:33

Glowhollow

7510

add a comment |

the point is, i have to detach a disk in azure, using c# and the resourcemanager provided by azure.

atm i have following...

  var computeClient = new ComputeManagementClient(credentials) { SubscriptionId = credentials.DefaultSubscriptionId };

  var ObjVirtualMachines = computeClient.VirtualMachines.GetAsync(ressgroup, virtualmname, null, new System.Threading.CancellationToken()).Result;

  var disk = new DataDisk(ObjVirtualMachines.StorageProfile.DataDisks.Count,

  DiskCreateOptionTypes.Empty,

  name,

  null,

  null,

  null,

  null,

  new ManagedDiskParametersInner(resourceid, acctype));

  var newUpdateVM = computeClient.VirtualMachines.CreateOrUpdateAsync(ressgroup, virtualmname, ObjVirtualMachines);

I didn't get it. Its primary used to attach a disk, with different parameters. There is no deattach function, so i tried, setting it to Empty. But that wont work either.

I also experimented with the disk itself. But i have to detach the disk from it, so working on the disk alone will not reach to the goal.

Any Ideas how to solve this problem ?

asked Nov 22 '18 at 14:33

Glowhollow

7510

the point is, i have to detach a disk in azure, using c# and the resourcemanager provided by azure.

atm i have following...

  var computeClient = new ComputeManagementClient(credentials) { SubscriptionId = credentials.DefaultSubscriptionId };

  var ObjVirtualMachines = computeClient.VirtualMachines.GetAsync(ressgroup, virtualmname, null, new System.Threading.CancellationToken()).Result;

  var disk = new DataDisk(ObjVirtualMachines.StorageProfile.DataDisks.Count,

  DiskCreateOptionTypes.Empty,

  name,

  null,

  null,

  null,

  null,

  new ManagedDiskParametersInner(resourceid, acctype));

  var newUpdateVM = computeClient.VirtualMachines.CreateOrUpdateAsync(ressgroup, virtualmname, ObjVirtualMachines);

I didn't get it. Its primary used to attach a disk, with different parameters. There is no deattach function, so i tried, setting it to Empty. But that wont work either.

I also experimented with the disk itself. But i have to detach the disk from it, so working on the disk alone will not reach to the goal.

Any Ideas how to solve this problem ?

c# azure

asked Nov 22 '18 at 14:33

Glowhollow

7510

asked Nov 22 '18 at 14:33

Glowhollow

7510

asked Nov 22 '18 at 14:33

Glowhollow

7510

asked Nov 22 '18 at 14:33

Glowhollow

7510

asked Nov 22 '18 at 14:33

Glowhollow

7510

add a comment |

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

ok, got a Solution that works...

   var ObjVirtualMachines = computeClient.VirtualMachines.GetAsync(ressgroup, virtualmname, null, new System.Threading.CancellationToken()).Result;

   var disktodetach = ObjVirtualMachines.StorageProfile.DataDisks.FirstOrDefault(p => p.Name == name);

   ObjVirtualMachines.StorageProfile.DataDisks.Remove(disktodetach);

   var newUpdateVM = computeClient.VirtualMachines.CreateOrUpdateAsync(ressgroup, virtualmname, ObjVirtualMachines).Result;

answered Nov 23 '18 at 10:32

Glowhollow

7510

Don't know if you know it, but you can mark your own answer as accepted, if it's the right one. It helps others to see that the question has a solution already.

– Pedro Gaspar
Nov 23 '18 at 10:38

thx, can accept tomorrow ;)

– Glowhollow
Nov 23 '18 at 10:45

Yeah, it's better to wait a little bit to see if no other answer comes! I was just making sure that you already knew it. ;-)

– Pedro Gaspar
Nov 23 '18 at 10:52

It's usually recommended that you await Async methods rather than hitting .Result (blog.stephencleary.com/2012/07/dont-block-on-async-code.html) - is there a reason you're doing it that way?

– Rob
Nov 23 '18 at 11:37

sure, we have a own automation software, wich have problems with the await. Results works better here, but you are right, await is the better option there

– Glowhollow
Nov 23 '18 at 12:34

add a comment |

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});

}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53433191%2fdetach-disk-from-vm-azure-c-sharp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

ok, got a Solution that works...

   var ObjVirtualMachines = computeClient.VirtualMachines.GetAsync(ressgroup, virtualmname, null, new System.Threading.CancellationToken()).Result;

   var disktodetach = ObjVirtualMachines.StorageProfile.DataDisks.FirstOrDefault(p => p.Name == name);

   ObjVirtualMachines.StorageProfile.DataDisks.Remove(disktodetach);

   var newUpdateVM = computeClient.VirtualMachines.CreateOrUpdateAsync(ressgroup, virtualmname, ObjVirtualMachines).Result;

answered Nov 23 '18 at 10:32

Glowhollow

7510

Don't know if you know it, but you can mark your own answer as accepted, if it's the right one. It helps others to see that the question has a solution already.

– Pedro Gaspar
Nov 23 '18 at 10:38

thx, can accept tomorrow ;)

– Glowhollow
Nov 23 '18 at 10:45

Yeah, it's better to wait a little bit to see if no other answer comes! I was just making sure that you already knew it. ;-)

– Pedro Gaspar
Nov 23 '18 at 10:52

It's usually recommended that you await Async methods rather than hitting .Result (blog.stephencleary.com/2012/07/dont-block-on-async-code.html) - is there a reason you're doing it that way?

– Rob
Nov 23 '18 at 11:37

sure, we have a own automation software, wich have problems with the await. Results works better here, but you are right, await is the better option there

– Glowhollow
Nov 23 '18 at 12:34

add a comment |

ok, got a Solution that works...

   var ObjVirtualMachines = computeClient.VirtualMachines.GetAsync(ressgroup, virtualmname, null, new System.Threading.CancellationToken()).Result;

   var disktodetach = ObjVirtualMachines.StorageProfile.DataDisks.FirstOrDefault(p => p.Name == name);

   ObjVirtualMachines.StorageProfile.DataDisks.Remove(disktodetach);

   var newUpdateVM = computeClient.VirtualMachines.CreateOrUpdateAsync(ressgroup, virtualmname, ObjVirtualMachines).Result;

answered Nov 23 '18 at 10:32

Glowhollow

7510

Don't know if you know it, but you can mark your own answer as accepted, if it's the right one. It helps others to see that the question has a solution already.

– Pedro Gaspar
Nov 23 '18 at 10:38

thx, can accept tomorrow ;)

– Glowhollow
Nov 23 '18 at 10:45

Yeah, it's better to wait a little bit to see if no other answer comes! I was just making sure that you already knew it. ;-)

– Pedro Gaspar
Nov 23 '18 at 10:52

It's usually recommended that you await Async methods rather than hitting .Result (blog.stephencleary.com/2012/07/dont-block-on-async-code.html) - is there a reason you're doing it that way?

– Rob
Nov 23 '18 at 11:37

sure, we have a own automation software, wich have problems with the await. Results works better here, but you are right, await is the better option there

– Glowhollow
Nov 23 '18 at 12:34

add a comment |

ok, got a Solution that works...

   var ObjVirtualMachines = computeClient.VirtualMachines.GetAsync(ressgroup, virtualmname, null, new System.Threading.CancellationToken()).Result;

   var disktodetach = ObjVirtualMachines.StorageProfile.DataDisks.FirstOrDefault(p => p.Name == name);

   ObjVirtualMachines.StorageProfile.DataDisks.Remove(disktodetach);

   var newUpdateVM = computeClient.VirtualMachines.CreateOrUpdateAsync(ressgroup, virtualmname, ObjVirtualMachines).Result;

answered Nov 23 '18 at 10:32

Glowhollow

7510

ok, got a Solution that works...

   var ObjVirtualMachines = computeClient.VirtualMachines.GetAsync(ressgroup, virtualmname, null, new System.Threading.CancellationToken()).Result;

   var disktodetach = ObjVirtualMachines.StorageProfile.DataDisks.FirstOrDefault(p => p.Name == name);

   ObjVirtualMachines.StorageProfile.DataDisks.Remove(disktodetach);

   var newUpdateVM = computeClient.VirtualMachines.CreateOrUpdateAsync(ressgroup, virtualmname, ObjVirtualMachines).Result;

answered Nov 23 '18 at 10:32

Glowhollow

7510

answered Nov 23 '18 at 10:32

Glowhollow

7510

answered Nov 23 '18 at 10:32

Glowhollow

7510

answered Nov 23 '18 at 10:32

Glowhollow

7510

Don't know if you know it, but you can mark your own answer as accepted, if it's the right one. It helps others to see that the question has a solution already.

– Pedro Gaspar
Nov 23 '18 at 10:38

thx, can accept tomorrow ;)

– Glowhollow
Nov 23 '18 at 10:45

Yeah, it's better to wait a little bit to see if no other answer comes! I was just making sure that you already knew it. ;-)

– Pedro Gaspar
Nov 23 '18 at 10:52

It's usually recommended that you await Async methods rather than hitting .Result (blog.stephencleary.com/2012/07/dont-block-on-async-code.html) - is there a reason you're doing it that way?

– Rob
Nov 23 '18 at 11:37

sure, we have a own automation software, wich have problems with the await. Results works better here, but you are right, await is the better option there

– Glowhollow
Nov 23 '18 at 12:34

add a comment |

Don't know if you know it, but you can mark your own answer as accepted, if it's the right one. It helps others to see that the question has a solution already.

– Pedro Gaspar
Nov 23 '18 at 10:38

thx, can accept tomorrow ;)

– Glowhollow
Nov 23 '18 at 10:45

Yeah, it's better to wait a little bit to see if no other answer comes! I was just making sure that you already knew it. ;-)

– Pedro Gaspar
Nov 23 '18 at 10:52

It's usually recommended that you await Async methods rather than hitting .Result (blog.stephencleary.com/2012/07/dont-block-on-async-code.html) - is there a reason you're doing it that way?

– Rob
Nov 23 '18 at 11:37

sure, we have a own automation software, wich have problems with the await. Results works better here, but you are right, await is the better option there

– Glowhollow
Nov 23 '18 at 12:34

Don't know if you know it, but you can mark your own answer as accepted, if it's the right one. It helps others to see that the question has a solution already.

– Pedro Gaspar
Nov 23 '18 at 10:38

thx, can accept tomorrow ;)

– Glowhollow
Nov 23 '18 at 10:45

Yeah, it's better to wait a little bit to see if no other answer comes! I was just making sure that you already knew it. ;-)

– Pedro Gaspar
Nov 23 '18 at 10:52

It's usually recommended that you await Async methods rather than hitting .Result (blog.stephencleary.com/2012/07/dont-block-on-async-code.html) - is there a reason you're doing it that way?

– Rob
Nov 23 '18 at 11:37

sure, we have a own automation software, wich have problems with the await. Results works better here, but you are right, await is the better option there

– Glowhollow
Nov 23 '18 at 12:34

add a comment |

draft saved

draft discarded

Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!

Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here

搜尋此網誌

Agfdhyk