bijections and order types











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












Suppose $kappa$ is an infinite cardinal and $alpha$ is an ordinal of cardinality $kappa$. Is it possible to find a bijection $f : kappa to alpha$ such that for all $x subseteqkappa$, $mathrm{ot}(x) leq mathrm{ot}(f[x])$? (Here, $mathrm{ot}(y)$ is the order type of a set of ordinals $y$.)










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    4
    down vote

    favorite












    Suppose $kappa$ is an infinite cardinal and $alpha$ is an ordinal of cardinality $kappa$. Is it possible to find a bijection $f : kappa to alpha$ such that for all $x subseteqkappa$, $mathrm{ot}(x) leq mathrm{ot}(f[x])$? (Here, $mathrm{ot}(y)$ is the order type of a set of ordinals $y$.)










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite











      Suppose $kappa$ is an infinite cardinal and $alpha$ is an ordinal of cardinality $kappa$. Is it possible to find a bijection $f : kappa to alpha$ such that for all $x subseteqkappa$, $mathrm{ot}(x) leq mathrm{ot}(f[x])$? (Here, $mathrm{ot}(y)$ is the order type of a set of ordinals $y$.)










      share|cite|improve this question













      Suppose $kappa$ is an infinite cardinal and $alpha$ is an ordinal of cardinality $kappa$. Is it possible to find a bijection $f : kappa to alpha$ such that for all $x subseteqkappa$, $mathrm{ot}(x) leq mathrm{ot}(f[x])$? (Here, $mathrm{ot}(y)$ is the order type of a set of ordinals $y$.)







      set-theory lo.logic






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 8 at 1:24









      Monroe Eskew

      7,51512057




      7,51512057






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          9
          down vote



          accepted










          When $kappa = aleph_0$, any bijection works.



          When $kappa$ is uncountable with uncountable cofinality, there is no order-type preserving bijection $fcolon kappato kappa+omega$. Indeed, let $X = f^{-1}((kappa+omega)setminus kappa)$. Then $X$ is not cofinal in $kappa$, so we can pick some $alphain kappa$ greater than every element of $X$, and $f(alpha)<kappa$. Then $text{ot}(Xcup {alpha})>omega$, but $text{ot}(f(Xcup {alpha})) = omega$.



          I'm not sure about the case when $kappa$ is uncountable with cofinality $omega$.






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 6




            I think you can proceed similarly when $kappa$ has countable cofinality, using $kappa+omega_1$ instead of $kappa+omega$. The preimage $X$ of the final $omega_1$ must have order-type $leqomega_1$ by the condition in the problem, but it can't be $<omega_1$ by cardinality. So $X$ has order-type exactly $omega_1$, and then $X$ can't be cofinal in $kappa$. Then pick a larger element $alpha<kappa$ and notice that $Xcup{alpha}$ has order-type $omega_1+1$ while its image has order-type only $omega_1$, just as in your proof.
            – Andreas Blass
            Nov 8 at 2:58












          • @AndreasBlass Ah great, thanks for supplying the argument.
            – Alex Kruckman
            Nov 8 at 3:00











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f314805%2fbijections-and-order-types%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest
































          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          9
          down vote



          accepted










          When $kappa = aleph_0$, any bijection works.



          When $kappa$ is uncountable with uncountable cofinality, there is no order-type preserving bijection $fcolon kappato kappa+omega$. Indeed, let $X = f^{-1}((kappa+omega)setminus kappa)$. Then $X$ is not cofinal in $kappa$, so we can pick some $alphain kappa$ greater than every element of $X$, and $f(alpha)<kappa$. Then $text{ot}(Xcup {alpha})>omega$, but $text{ot}(f(Xcup {alpha})) = omega$.



          I'm not sure about the case when $kappa$ is uncountable with cofinality $omega$.






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 6




            I think you can proceed similarly when $kappa$ has countable cofinality, using $kappa+omega_1$ instead of $kappa+omega$. The preimage $X$ of the final $omega_1$ must have order-type $leqomega_1$ by the condition in the problem, but it can't be $<omega_1$ by cardinality. So $X$ has order-type exactly $omega_1$, and then $X$ can't be cofinal in $kappa$. Then pick a larger element $alpha<kappa$ and notice that $Xcup{alpha}$ has order-type $omega_1+1$ while its image has order-type only $omega_1$, just as in your proof.
            – Andreas Blass
            Nov 8 at 2:58












          • @AndreasBlass Ah great, thanks for supplying the argument.
            – Alex Kruckman
            Nov 8 at 3:00















          up vote
          9
          down vote



          accepted










          When $kappa = aleph_0$, any bijection works.



          When $kappa$ is uncountable with uncountable cofinality, there is no order-type preserving bijection $fcolon kappato kappa+omega$. Indeed, let $X = f^{-1}((kappa+omega)setminus kappa)$. Then $X$ is not cofinal in $kappa$, so we can pick some $alphain kappa$ greater than every element of $X$, and $f(alpha)<kappa$. Then $text{ot}(Xcup {alpha})>omega$, but $text{ot}(f(Xcup {alpha})) = omega$.



          I'm not sure about the case when $kappa$ is uncountable with cofinality $omega$.






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 6




            I think you can proceed similarly when $kappa$ has countable cofinality, using $kappa+omega_1$ instead of $kappa+omega$. The preimage $X$ of the final $omega_1$ must have order-type $leqomega_1$ by the condition in the problem, but it can't be $<omega_1$ by cardinality. So $X$ has order-type exactly $omega_1$, and then $X$ can't be cofinal in $kappa$. Then pick a larger element $alpha<kappa$ and notice that $Xcup{alpha}$ has order-type $omega_1+1$ while its image has order-type only $omega_1$, just as in your proof.
            – Andreas Blass
            Nov 8 at 2:58












          • @AndreasBlass Ah great, thanks for supplying the argument.
            – Alex Kruckman
            Nov 8 at 3:00













          up vote
          9
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          9
          down vote



          accepted






          When $kappa = aleph_0$, any bijection works.



          When $kappa$ is uncountable with uncountable cofinality, there is no order-type preserving bijection $fcolon kappato kappa+omega$. Indeed, let $X = f^{-1}((kappa+omega)setminus kappa)$. Then $X$ is not cofinal in $kappa$, so we can pick some $alphain kappa$ greater than every element of $X$, and $f(alpha)<kappa$. Then $text{ot}(Xcup {alpha})>omega$, but $text{ot}(f(Xcup {alpha})) = omega$.



          I'm not sure about the case when $kappa$ is uncountable with cofinality $omega$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          When $kappa = aleph_0$, any bijection works.



          When $kappa$ is uncountable with uncountable cofinality, there is no order-type preserving bijection $fcolon kappato kappa+omega$. Indeed, let $X = f^{-1}((kappa+omega)setminus kappa)$. Then $X$ is not cofinal in $kappa$, so we can pick some $alphain kappa$ greater than every element of $X$, and $f(alpha)<kappa$. Then $text{ot}(Xcup {alpha})>omega$, but $text{ot}(f(Xcup {alpha})) = omega$.



          I'm not sure about the case when $kappa$ is uncountable with cofinality $omega$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 8 at 2:11









          Alex Kruckman

          1,46411012




          1,46411012








          • 6




            I think you can proceed similarly when $kappa$ has countable cofinality, using $kappa+omega_1$ instead of $kappa+omega$. The preimage $X$ of the final $omega_1$ must have order-type $leqomega_1$ by the condition in the problem, but it can't be $<omega_1$ by cardinality. So $X$ has order-type exactly $omega_1$, and then $X$ can't be cofinal in $kappa$. Then pick a larger element $alpha<kappa$ and notice that $Xcup{alpha}$ has order-type $omega_1+1$ while its image has order-type only $omega_1$, just as in your proof.
            – Andreas Blass
            Nov 8 at 2:58












          • @AndreasBlass Ah great, thanks for supplying the argument.
            – Alex Kruckman
            Nov 8 at 3:00














          • 6




            I think you can proceed similarly when $kappa$ has countable cofinality, using $kappa+omega_1$ instead of $kappa+omega$. The preimage $X$ of the final $omega_1$ must have order-type $leqomega_1$ by the condition in the problem, but it can't be $<omega_1$ by cardinality. So $X$ has order-type exactly $omega_1$, and then $X$ can't be cofinal in $kappa$. Then pick a larger element $alpha<kappa$ and notice that $Xcup{alpha}$ has order-type $omega_1+1$ while its image has order-type only $omega_1$, just as in your proof.
            – Andreas Blass
            Nov 8 at 2:58












          • @AndreasBlass Ah great, thanks for supplying the argument.
            – Alex Kruckman
            Nov 8 at 3:00








          6




          6




          I think you can proceed similarly when $kappa$ has countable cofinality, using $kappa+omega_1$ instead of $kappa+omega$. The preimage $X$ of the final $omega_1$ must have order-type $leqomega_1$ by the condition in the problem, but it can't be $<omega_1$ by cardinality. So $X$ has order-type exactly $omega_1$, and then $X$ can't be cofinal in $kappa$. Then pick a larger element $alpha<kappa$ and notice that $Xcup{alpha}$ has order-type $omega_1+1$ while its image has order-type only $omega_1$, just as in your proof.
          – Andreas Blass
          Nov 8 at 2:58






          I think you can proceed similarly when $kappa$ has countable cofinality, using $kappa+omega_1$ instead of $kappa+omega$. The preimage $X$ of the final $omega_1$ must have order-type $leqomega_1$ by the condition in the problem, but it can't be $<omega_1$ by cardinality. So $X$ has order-type exactly $omega_1$, and then $X$ can't be cofinal in $kappa$. Then pick a larger element $alpha<kappa$ and notice that $Xcup{alpha}$ has order-type $omega_1+1$ while its image has order-type only $omega_1$, just as in your proof.
          – Andreas Blass
          Nov 8 at 2:58














          @AndreasBlass Ah great, thanks for supplying the argument.
          – Alex Kruckman
          Nov 8 at 3:00




          @AndreasBlass Ah great, thanks for supplying the argument.
          – Alex Kruckman
          Nov 8 at 3:00


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f314805%2fbijections-and-order-types%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest




















































































          Popular posts from this blog

          Guess what letter conforming each word

          Port of Spain

          Run scheduled task as local user group (not BUILTIN)