C# - StackTrace | calls method when “FrameCount” changed
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
I need to know when a function is called and a function is ended.
Otherwise i need to detect everytime when the "StackTrace.FrameCount" is changed.
My idea was to insert my function into the Setter of the "StackTrace.FrameCount" and Redirect to the base-function of FrameCount but ...
the problem is, "StackTrace.FrameCount" has only an GETTER.
//
// Zusammenfassung:
// Gets the number of frames in the stack trace.
//
// Rückgabewerte:
// The number of frames in the stack trace.
public virtual int FrameCount { get; }
Is there any possibility to make an PropertyChangedEventHandler or something else to manage this Problem?
Many Thanks! :)
Thomas
c# windows visual-studio .net-core
asked Nov 8 at 11:22
Thomas Brunmüller
12
New contributor
Thomas Brunmüller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
I need to know when a function is called and a function is ended.
Otherwise i need to detect everytime when the "StackTrace.FrameCount" is changed.
My idea was to insert my function into the Setter of the "StackTrace.FrameCount" and Redirect to the base-function of FrameCount but ...
the problem is, "StackTrace.FrameCount" has only an GETTER.
//
// Zusammenfassung:
// Gets the number of frames in the stack trace.
//
// Rückgabewerte:
// The number of frames in the stack trace.
public virtual int FrameCount { get; }
Is there any possibility to make an PropertyChangedEventHandler or something else to manage this Problem?
Many Thanks! :)
Thomas
c# windows visual-studio .net-core
asked Nov 8 at 11:22
Thomas Brunmüller
12
New contributor
Thomas Brunmüller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Can you give us some context of why you are doing this? In case there is an alternative solution. Which version of .NET Core are you using?
– mjwills
Nov 8 at 11:24
I need to make a "Performance-Watch", how much time is spent for each function. Now its very hard because i need to insert a method call in the beginning of a function and at the end. I use .Net-Core 2.1.
– Thomas Brunmüller
Nov 8 at 11:27
1
There is no way to do this as simple as you want it to be, as the code runs nothing is maintained that contains the current stack trace, instead a stack trace is produced on demand. Please explain which problem you're trying to solve where this is a solution, there has to be a different and better way to accomplish what you want.
– Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Nov 8 at 11:27
1
Typically performance profilers either take a snapshot of where each thread is currently at N times a second and constructs the call stacks from this, or they instrument the code by adding code to each method entry and exit. I have no idea how to do the former, the latter could be done by mono.cecil or ildasm/ilasm or similar. Either way it's going to be a good portion of work. Are you sure there are no existing tools you can use instead for this, such as dotTrace ?
– Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Nov 8 at 11:30
Also, do you really ned method-level performance measurements? Can't you use BenchmarkDotNet to benchmark your code instead?
– Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Nov 8 at 11:31
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
I need to know when a function is called and a function is ended.
Otherwise i need to detect everytime when the "StackTrace.FrameCount" is changed.
My idea was to insert my function into the Setter of the "StackTrace.FrameCount" and Redirect to the base-function of FrameCount but ...
the problem is, "StackTrace.FrameCount" has only an GETTER.
//
// Zusammenfassung:
// Gets the number of frames in the stack trace.
//
// Rückgabewerte:
// The number of frames in the stack trace.
public virtual int FrameCount { get; }
Is there any possibility to make an PropertyChangedEventHandler or something else to manage this Problem?
Many Thanks! :)
Thomas
c# windows visual-studio .net-core
asked Nov 8 at 11:22
Thomas Brunmüller
12
New contributor
Thomas Brunmüller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I need to know when a function is called and a function is ended.
Otherwise i need to detect everytime when the "StackTrace.FrameCount" is changed.
My idea was to insert my function into the Setter of the "StackTrace.FrameCount" and Redirect to the base-function of FrameCount but ...
the problem is, "StackTrace.FrameCount" has only an GETTER.
//
// Zusammenfassung:
// Gets the number of frames in the stack trace.
//
// Rückgabewerte:
// The number of frames in the stack trace.
public virtual int FrameCount { get; }
Is there any possibility to make an PropertyChangedEventHandler or something else to manage this Problem?
Many Thanks! :)
Thomas
c# windows visual-studio .net-core
c# windows visual-studio .net-core
asked Nov 8 at 11:22
Thomas Brunmüller
12
New contributor
Thomas Brunmüller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Nov 8 at 11:22
Thomas Brunmüller
12
New contributor
Thomas Brunmüller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Nov 8 at 11:22
Thomas Brunmüller
12
New contributor
Thomas Brunmüller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Nov 8 at 11:22
Thomas Brunmüller
12
asked Nov 8 at 11:22
Thomas Brunmüller
12
12
New contributor
Thomas Brunmüller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Thomas Brunmüller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Thomas Brunmüller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
Can you give us some context of why you are doing this? In case there is an alternative solution. Which version of .NET Core are you using?
– mjwills
Nov 8 at 11:24
I need to make a "Performance-Watch", how much time is spent for each function. Now its very hard because i need to insert a method call in the beginning of a function and at the end. I use .Net-Core 2.1.
– Thomas Brunmüller
Nov 8 at 11:27
1
There is no way to do this as simple as you want it to be, as the code runs nothing is maintained that contains the current stack trace, instead a stack trace is produced on demand. Please explain which problem you're trying to solve where this is a solution, there has to be a different and better way to accomplish what you want.
– Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Nov 8 at 11:27
1
Typically performance profilers either take a snapshot of where each thread is currently at N times a second and constructs the call stacks from this, or they instrument the code by adding code to each method entry and exit. I have no idea how to do the former, the latter could be done by mono.cecil or ildasm/ilasm or similar. Either way it's going to be a good portion of work. Are you sure there are no existing tools you can use instead for this, such as dotTrace ?
– Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Nov 8 at 11:30
Also, do you really ned method-level performance measurements? Can't you use BenchmarkDotNet to benchmark your code instead?
– Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Nov 8 at 11:31
|
show 3 more comments
1
Can you give us some context of why you are doing this? In case there is an alternative solution. Which version of .NET Core are you using?
– mjwills
Nov 8 at 11:24
I need to make a "Performance-Watch", how much time is spent for each function. Now its very hard because i need to insert a method call in the beginning of a function and at the end. I use .Net-Core 2.1.
– Thomas Brunmüller
Nov 8 at 11:27
1
There is no way to do this as simple as you want it to be, as the code runs nothing is maintained that contains the current stack trace, instead a stack trace is produced on demand. Please explain which problem you're trying to solve where this is a solution, there has to be a different and better way to accomplish what you want.
– Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Nov 8 at 11:27
1
Typically performance profilers either take a snapshot of where each thread is currently at N times a second and constructs the call stacks from this, or they instrument the code by adding code to each method entry and exit. I have no idea how to do the former, the latter could be done by mono.cecil or ildasm/ilasm or similar. Either way it's going to be a good portion of work. Are you sure there are no existing tools you can use instead for this, such as dotTrace ?
– Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Nov 8 at 11:30
Also, do you really ned method-level performance measurements? Can't you use BenchmarkDotNet to benchmark your code instead?
– Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Nov 8 at 11:31
1
1
Can you give us some context of why you are doing this? In case there is an alternative solution. Which version of .NET Core are you using?
– mjwills
Nov 8 at 11:24
Can you give us some context of why you are doing this? In case there is an alternative solution. Which version of .NET Core are you using?
– mjwills
Nov 8 at 11:24
I need to make a "Performance-Watch", how much time is spent for each function. Now its very hard because i need to insert a method call in the beginning of a function and at the end. I use .Net-Core 2.1.
– Thomas Brunmüller
Nov 8 at 11:27
I need to make a "Performance-Watch", how much time is spent for each function. Now its very hard because i need to insert a method call in the beginning of a function and at the end. I use .Net-Core 2.1.
– Thomas Brunmüller
Nov 8 at 11:27
1
1
There is no way to do this as simple as you want it to be, as the code runs nothing is maintained that contains the current stack trace, instead a stack trace is produced on demand. Please explain which problem you're trying to solve where this is a solution, there has to be a different and better way to accomplish what you want.
– Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Nov 8 at 11:27
There is no way to do this as simple as you want it to be, as the code runs nothing is maintained that contains the current stack trace, instead a stack trace is produced on demand. Please explain which problem you're trying to solve where this is a solution, there has to be a different and better way to accomplish what you want.
– Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Nov 8 at 11:27
1
1
Typically performance profilers either take a snapshot of where each thread is currently at N times a second and constructs the call stacks from this, or they instrument the code by adding code to each method entry and exit. I have no idea how to do the former, the latter could be done by mono.cecil or ildasm/ilasm or similar. Either way it's going to be a good portion of work. Are you sure there are no existing tools you can use instead for this, such as dotTrace ?
– Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Nov 8 at 11:30
Typically performance profilers either take a snapshot of where each thread is currently at N times a second and constructs the call stacks from this, or they instrument the code by adding code to each method entry and exit. I have no idea how to do the former, the latter could be done by mono.cecil or ildasm/ilasm or similar. Either way it's going to be a good portion of work. Are you sure there are no existing tools you can use instead for this, such as dotTrace ?
– Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Nov 8 at 11:30
Also, do you really ned method-level performance measurements? Can't you use BenchmarkDotNet to benchmark your code instead?
– Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Nov 8 at 11:31
Also, do you really ned method-level performance measurements? Can't you use BenchmarkDotNet to benchmark your code instead?
– Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Nov 8 at 11:31
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
You're probably looking for some kind of AOP to intercept method entry and exit "events". An easy way is for example MethodBoundaryAspect.Fody, which enables you to write a custom attribute that exposes three different methods for interception, OnEntry, OnExit and OnException. To measure performance of a method you can simple start a stopwatch in OnEntry and stop and display the elapsed time in OnExit.
answered Nov 8 at 13:40
Lennart
5,926124865
Does that library work in .NET Core?
– mjwills
Nov 8 at 20:17
@mjwills It should, but I haven't tried it.
– Lennart
Nov 9 at 6:52
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
You're probably looking for some kind of AOP to intercept method entry and exit "events". An easy way is for example MethodBoundaryAspect.Fody, which enables you to write a custom attribute that exposes three different methods for interception, OnEntry, OnExit and OnException. To measure performance of a method you can simple start a stopwatch in OnEntry and stop and display the elapsed time in OnExit.
answered Nov 8 at 13:40
Lennart
5,926124865
Does that library work in .NET Core?
– mjwills
Nov 8 at 20:17
@mjwills It should, but I haven't tried it.
– Lennart
Nov 9 at 6:52
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
You're probably looking for some kind of AOP to intercept method entry and exit "events". An easy way is for example MethodBoundaryAspect.Fody, which enables you to write a custom attribute that exposes three different methods for interception, OnEntry, OnExit and OnException. To measure performance of a method you can simple start a stopwatch in OnEntry and stop and display the elapsed time in OnExit.
answered Nov 8 at 13:40
Lennart
5,926124865
Does that library work in .NET Core?
– mjwills
Nov 8 at 20:17
@mjwills It should, but I haven't tried it.
– Lennart
Nov 9 at 6:52
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
You're probably looking for some kind of AOP to intercept method entry and exit "events". An easy way is for example MethodBoundaryAspect.Fody, which enables you to write a custom attribute that exposes three different methods for interception, OnEntry, OnExit and OnException. To measure performance of a method you can simple start a stopwatch in OnEntry and stop and display the elapsed time in OnExit.
answered Nov 8 at 13:40
Lennart
5,926124865
You're probably looking for some kind of AOP to intercept method entry and exit "events". An easy way is for example MethodBoundaryAspect.Fody, which enables you to write a custom attribute that exposes three different methods for interception, OnEntry, OnExit and OnException. To measure performance of a method you can simple start a stopwatch in OnEntry and stop and display the elapsed time in OnExit.
answered Nov 8 at 13:40
Lennart
5,926124865
answered Nov 8 at 13:40
Lennart
5,926124865
answered Nov 8 at 13:40
Lennart
5,926124865
answered Nov 8 at 13:40
Lennart
5,926124865
5,926124865
Does that library work in .NET Core?
– mjwills
Nov 8 at 20:17
@mjwills It should, but I haven't tried it.
– Lennart
Nov 9 at 6:52
add a comment |
Does that library work in .NET Core?
– mjwills
Nov 8 at 20:17
@mjwills It should, but I haven't tried it.
– Lennart
Nov 9 at 6:52
Does that library work in .NET Core?
– mjwills
Nov 8 at 20:17
Does that library work in .NET Core?
– mjwills
Nov 8 at 20:17
@mjwills It should, but I haven't tried it.
– Lennart
Nov 9 at 6:52
@mjwills It should, but I haven't tried it.
– Lennart
Nov 9 at 6:52
add a comment |
Thomas Brunmüller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thomas Brunmüller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thomas Brunmüller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thomas Brunmüller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53206741%2fc-sharp-stacktrace-calls-method-when-framecount-changed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
Can you give us some context of why you are doing this? In case there is an alternative solution. Which version of .NET Core are you using?
– mjwills
Nov 8 at 11:24
I need to make a "Performance-Watch", how much time is spent for each function. Now its very hard because i need to insert a method call in the beginning of a function and at the end. I use .Net-Core 2.1.
– Thomas Brunmüller
Nov 8 at 11:27
1
There is no way to do this as simple as you want it to be, as the code runs nothing is maintained that contains the current stack trace, instead a stack trace is produced on demand. Please explain which problem you're trying to solve where this is a solution, there has to be a different and better way to accomplish what you want.
– Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Nov 8 at 11:27
1
Typically performance profilers either take a snapshot of where each thread is currently at N times a second and constructs the call stacks from this, or they instrument the code by adding code to each method entry and exit. I have no idea how to do the former, the latter could be done by mono.cecil or ildasm/ilasm or similar. Either way it's going to be a good portion of work. Are you sure there are no existing tools you can use instead for this, such as dotTrace ?
– Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Nov 8 at 11:30
Also, do you really ned method-level performance measurements? Can't you use BenchmarkDotNet to benchmark your code instead?
– Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
Nov 8 at 11:31