NV toolkit extensions include file location - Linux vs Windows
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
On Linux, if you have /path/to/cuda-10.0/include
in your include path, you can #include <nvToolsExt.h>
, and life is good. However, a collaborator using Windows has just told me that (with CUDA 10), the nvtx-related include files are in a subdirectory of the general CUDA include directory, named nvtx3
.
I don't use Windows, but I can't believe he got it wrong, so:
- How come there's a different include directory structure?
- Why has this happened with CUDA 10 as opposed to previous versions?
cuda include-path nvtx
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
On Linux, if you have /path/to/cuda-10.0/include
in your include path, you can #include <nvToolsExt.h>
, and life is good. However, a collaborator using Windows has just told me that (with CUDA 10), the nvtx-related include files are in a subdirectory of the general CUDA include directory, named nvtx3
.
I don't use Windows, but I can't believe he got it wrong, so:
- How come there's a different include directory structure?
- Why has this happened with CUDA 10 as opposed to previous versions?
cuda include-path nvtx
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
On Linux, if you have /path/to/cuda-10.0/include
in your include path, you can #include <nvToolsExt.h>
, and life is good. However, a collaborator using Windows has just told me that (with CUDA 10), the nvtx-related include files are in a subdirectory of the general CUDA include directory, named nvtx3
.
I don't use Windows, but I can't believe he got it wrong, so:
- How come there's a different include directory structure?
- Why has this happened with CUDA 10 as opposed to previous versions?
cuda include-path nvtx
On Linux, if you have /path/to/cuda-10.0/include
in your include path, you can #include <nvToolsExt.h>
, and life is good. However, a collaborator using Windows has just told me that (with CUDA 10), the nvtx-related include files are in a subdirectory of the general CUDA include directory, named nvtx3
.
I don't use Windows, but I can't believe he got it wrong, so:
- How come there's a different include directory structure?
- Why has this happened with CUDA 10 as opposed to previous versions?
cuda include-path nvtx
cuda include-path nvtx
edited Nov 8 at 14:26
asked Nov 8 at 9:23
einpoklum
32.1k25111226
32.1k25111226
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53204732%2fnv-toolkit-extensions-include-file-location-linux-vs-windows%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password