LMAX's disruptor. How to define multi EventHandlerGroup?
I want to handle different event with multi-EventHandleGroup?I can't find example with that.thanks...
it's the code:
executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(threadPoolSize);
disruptor = new Disruptor<>(new DefaultEventFactory(),
ringBufferSize, executorService
, ProducerType.SINGLE, new BlockingWaitStrategy());
EventHandlerGroup<OrderEvent> orderEventEventHandlerGroup =
disruptor.handleEventsWith(
new OrderEventHandle(rabbitTemplate));
orderEventEventHandlerGroup.then(new
MoveEventFromProcessing(redisService))
.then(new EventClearHandle());
I want to add another event and I want to handle it with another EventHandleGroup like:
cancelEventDisruptor.handleEventsWith(new
CancelOrderHandle()).then(new MoveEventFromProcessing(redisService))
.then(new EventClearHandle());
java disruptor-pattern lmax
add a comment |
I want to handle different event with multi-EventHandleGroup?I can't find example with that.thanks...
it's the code:
executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(threadPoolSize);
disruptor = new Disruptor<>(new DefaultEventFactory(),
ringBufferSize, executorService
, ProducerType.SINGLE, new BlockingWaitStrategy());
EventHandlerGroup<OrderEvent> orderEventEventHandlerGroup =
disruptor.handleEventsWith(
new OrderEventHandle(rabbitTemplate));
orderEventEventHandlerGroup.then(new
MoveEventFromProcessing(redisService))
.then(new EventClearHandle());
I want to add another event and I want to handle it with another EventHandleGroup like:
cancelEventDisruptor.handleEventsWith(new
CancelOrderHandle()).then(new MoveEventFromProcessing(redisService))
.then(new EventClearHandle());
java disruptor-pattern lmax
1
Please add more details to your question.
– Busy Bee
Nov 19 '18 at 7:02
Hi and welcome to SO. Please edit the question to show what you've tried. Like this we will be able to better understand your problem/question and thus we will be able to better help you. It is best to provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example. For more information, please see How to Ask and take the Tour.
– quant
Nov 19 '18 at 7:14
I have update it.thanks
– 刘德华
Nov 19 '18 at 7:58
add a comment |
I want to handle different event with multi-EventHandleGroup?I can't find example with that.thanks...
it's the code:
executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(threadPoolSize);
disruptor = new Disruptor<>(new DefaultEventFactory(),
ringBufferSize, executorService
, ProducerType.SINGLE, new BlockingWaitStrategy());
EventHandlerGroup<OrderEvent> orderEventEventHandlerGroup =
disruptor.handleEventsWith(
new OrderEventHandle(rabbitTemplate));
orderEventEventHandlerGroup.then(new
MoveEventFromProcessing(redisService))
.then(new EventClearHandle());
I want to add another event and I want to handle it with another EventHandleGroup like:
cancelEventDisruptor.handleEventsWith(new
CancelOrderHandle()).then(new MoveEventFromProcessing(redisService))
.then(new EventClearHandle());
java disruptor-pattern lmax
I want to handle different event with multi-EventHandleGroup?I can't find example with that.thanks...
it's the code:
executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(threadPoolSize);
disruptor = new Disruptor<>(new DefaultEventFactory(),
ringBufferSize, executorService
, ProducerType.SINGLE, new BlockingWaitStrategy());
EventHandlerGroup<OrderEvent> orderEventEventHandlerGroup =
disruptor.handleEventsWith(
new OrderEventHandle(rabbitTemplate));
orderEventEventHandlerGroup.then(new
MoveEventFromProcessing(redisService))
.then(new EventClearHandle());
I want to add another event and I want to handle it with another EventHandleGroup like:
cancelEventDisruptor.handleEventsWith(new
CancelOrderHandle()).then(new MoveEventFromProcessing(redisService))
.then(new EventClearHandle());
java disruptor-pattern lmax
java disruptor-pattern lmax
edited Nov 19 '18 at 7:57
刘德华
asked Nov 19 '18 at 6:53
刘德华刘德华
11
11
1
Please add more details to your question.
– Busy Bee
Nov 19 '18 at 7:02
Hi and welcome to SO. Please edit the question to show what you've tried. Like this we will be able to better understand your problem/question and thus we will be able to better help you. It is best to provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example. For more information, please see How to Ask and take the Tour.
– quant
Nov 19 '18 at 7:14
I have update it.thanks
– 刘德华
Nov 19 '18 at 7:58
add a comment |
1
Please add more details to your question.
– Busy Bee
Nov 19 '18 at 7:02
Hi and welcome to SO. Please edit the question to show what you've tried. Like this we will be able to better understand your problem/question and thus we will be able to better help you. It is best to provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example. For more information, please see How to Ask and take the Tour.
– quant
Nov 19 '18 at 7:14
I have update it.thanks
– 刘德华
Nov 19 '18 at 7:58
1
1
Please add more details to your question.
– Busy Bee
Nov 19 '18 at 7:02
Please add more details to your question.
– Busy Bee
Nov 19 '18 at 7:02
Hi and welcome to SO. Please edit the question to show what you've tried. Like this we will be able to better understand your problem/question and thus we will be able to better help you. It is best to provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example. For more information, please see How to Ask and take the Tour.
– quant
Nov 19 '18 at 7:14
Hi and welcome to SO. Please edit the question to show what you've tried. Like this we will be able to better understand your problem/question and thus we will be able to better help you. It is best to provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example. For more information, please see How to Ask and take the Tour.
– quant
Nov 19 '18 at 7:14
I have update it.thanks
– 刘德华
Nov 19 '18 at 7:58
I have update it.thanks
– 刘德华
Nov 19 '18 at 7:58
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
All eventHandlers
see all messages. To achieve what you are looking for your OrderEventHandle
and CancelOrderHandle
need to be able to establish the type of event seen and ignore the ones which do not apply to them.
In the example code you are also setting up two complete handling chains. You would be better advised to have a single MoveEventFromProcessing
gated (see SequenceBarrier) on both the OrderEventHandle
and CancelOrderHandle
and then gate the EventClearHandle
on that. So the topology would look like
Producer -> RB -> OrderEventHandle -> MoveEventFromProcessing -> EventClearHandle
-> CancelEventHandle /
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53369651%2flmaxs-disruptor-how-to-define-multi-eventhandlergroup%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
All eventHandlers
see all messages. To achieve what you are looking for your OrderEventHandle
and CancelOrderHandle
need to be able to establish the type of event seen and ignore the ones which do not apply to them.
In the example code you are also setting up two complete handling chains. You would be better advised to have a single MoveEventFromProcessing
gated (see SequenceBarrier) on both the OrderEventHandle
and CancelOrderHandle
and then gate the EventClearHandle
on that. So the topology would look like
Producer -> RB -> OrderEventHandle -> MoveEventFromProcessing -> EventClearHandle
-> CancelEventHandle /
add a comment |
All eventHandlers
see all messages. To achieve what you are looking for your OrderEventHandle
and CancelOrderHandle
need to be able to establish the type of event seen and ignore the ones which do not apply to them.
In the example code you are also setting up two complete handling chains. You would be better advised to have a single MoveEventFromProcessing
gated (see SequenceBarrier) on both the OrderEventHandle
and CancelOrderHandle
and then gate the EventClearHandle
on that. So the topology would look like
Producer -> RB -> OrderEventHandle -> MoveEventFromProcessing -> EventClearHandle
-> CancelEventHandle /
add a comment |
All eventHandlers
see all messages. To achieve what you are looking for your OrderEventHandle
and CancelOrderHandle
need to be able to establish the type of event seen and ignore the ones which do not apply to them.
In the example code you are also setting up two complete handling chains. You would be better advised to have a single MoveEventFromProcessing
gated (see SequenceBarrier) on both the OrderEventHandle
and CancelOrderHandle
and then gate the EventClearHandle
on that. So the topology would look like
Producer -> RB -> OrderEventHandle -> MoveEventFromProcessing -> EventClearHandle
-> CancelEventHandle /
All eventHandlers
see all messages. To achieve what you are looking for your OrderEventHandle
and CancelOrderHandle
need to be able to establish the type of event seen and ignore the ones which do not apply to them.
In the example code you are also setting up two complete handling chains. You would be better advised to have a single MoveEventFromProcessing
gated (see SequenceBarrier) on both the OrderEventHandle
and CancelOrderHandle
and then gate the EventClearHandle
on that. So the topology would look like
Producer -> RB -> OrderEventHandle -> MoveEventFromProcessing -> EventClearHandle
-> CancelEventHandle /
answered Nov 20 '18 at 12:00
Sam Turtel BarkerSam Turtel Barker
775616
775616
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53369651%2flmaxs-disruptor-how-to-define-multi-eventhandlergroup%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Please add more details to your question.
– Busy Bee
Nov 19 '18 at 7:02
Hi and welcome to SO. Please edit the question to show what you've tried. Like this we will be able to better understand your problem/question and thus we will be able to better help you. It is best to provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example. For more information, please see How to Ask and take the Tour.
– quant
Nov 19 '18 at 7:14
I have update it.thanks
– 刘德华
Nov 19 '18 at 7:58