Should a using declaration be able to refer to a friend function
I have a class with a friend function defined in the class head. When I do a using declaration of this friend function it works in MSVC2017 but neither in GCC 8.2 or Clang 7.0. Who is right? Here is the godbolt link (https://godbolt.org/z/_7MVlh), and here is the code:
namespace vec {
class Vec {
friend Vec vec_max(const Vec& a, const Vec& b) { return a; }
};
}
void test() {
using vec::vec_max;
}
GCC gives the error on the using declaration: "error: no member named 'vec_max' in namespace 'vec'". Clang gave a similar message. MSVC compiled it as intended.
According to my understanding vec_max should reside in the vec namespace and MSVC should be correct. But there may be some subtle writing in the standard that makes the more restrictive interpretation of gcc and clang correct (although less intuitive).
c++ declaration using friend
add a comment |
I have a class with a friend function defined in the class head. When I do a using declaration of this friend function it works in MSVC2017 but neither in GCC 8.2 or Clang 7.0. Who is right? Here is the godbolt link (https://godbolt.org/z/_7MVlh), and here is the code:
namespace vec {
class Vec {
friend Vec vec_max(const Vec& a, const Vec& b) { return a; }
};
}
void test() {
using vec::vec_max;
}
GCC gives the error on the using declaration: "error: no member named 'vec_max' in namespace 'vec'". Clang gave a similar message. MSVC compiled it as intended.
According to my understanding vec_max should reside in the vec namespace and MSVC should be correct. But there may be some subtle writing in the standard that makes the more restrictive interpretation of gcc and clang correct (although less intuitive).
c++ declaration using friend
3
friend
functions defined inline in a class can only be found through ADL for that class, so MSVC is wrong here.
– Quentin
Nov 21 '18 at 10:15
add a comment |
I have a class with a friend function defined in the class head. When I do a using declaration of this friend function it works in MSVC2017 but neither in GCC 8.2 or Clang 7.0. Who is right? Here is the godbolt link (https://godbolt.org/z/_7MVlh), and here is the code:
namespace vec {
class Vec {
friend Vec vec_max(const Vec& a, const Vec& b) { return a; }
};
}
void test() {
using vec::vec_max;
}
GCC gives the error on the using declaration: "error: no member named 'vec_max' in namespace 'vec'". Clang gave a similar message. MSVC compiled it as intended.
According to my understanding vec_max should reside in the vec namespace and MSVC should be correct. But there may be some subtle writing in the standard that makes the more restrictive interpretation of gcc and clang correct (although less intuitive).
c++ declaration using friend
I have a class with a friend function defined in the class head. When I do a using declaration of this friend function it works in MSVC2017 but neither in GCC 8.2 or Clang 7.0. Who is right? Here is the godbolt link (https://godbolt.org/z/_7MVlh), and here is the code:
namespace vec {
class Vec {
friend Vec vec_max(const Vec& a, const Vec& b) { return a; }
};
}
void test() {
using vec::vec_max;
}
GCC gives the error on the using declaration: "error: no member named 'vec_max' in namespace 'vec'". Clang gave a similar message. MSVC compiled it as intended.
According to my understanding vec_max should reside in the vec namespace and MSVC should be correct. But there may be some subtle writing in the standard that makes the more restrictive interpretation of gcc and clang correct (although less intuitive).
c++ declaration using friend
c++ declaration using friend
asked Nov 21 '18 at 10:11
Bengt GustafssonBengt Gustafsson
19428
19428
3
friend
functions defined inline in a class can only be found through ADL for that class, so MSVC is wrong here.
– Quentin
Nov 21 '18 at 10:15
add a comment |
3
friend
functions defined inline in a class can only be found through ADL for that class, so MSVC is wrong here.
– Quentin
Nov 21 '18 at 10:15
3
3
friend
functions defined inline in a class can only be found through ADL for that class, so MSVC is wrong here.– Quentin
Nov 21 '18 at 10:15
friend
functions defined inline in a class can only be found through ADL for that class, so MSVC is wrong here.– Quentin
Nov 21 '18 at 10:15
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
MSVC is wrong here. When a friend function is defined inline within a class definition and not declared outside, it should not be found by normal name lookup and only Argument-Dependent Lookup should be able to find it.
Quoting C++17 (n4659):
14.3 [class.friend]
6 A function can be defined in a friend declaration of a class if and only if the class is a non-local class (12.4),
the function name is unqualified, and the function has namespace scope. ...
7 Such a function is implicitly an inline function (10.1.6). A
friend
function defined in a class is in the (lexical)
scope of the class in which it is defined. A friend function defined outside the class is not (6.4.1).
and 6.4.2/4 [basic.lookup.argdep]
When considering an associated namespace, the lookup is the same as the lookup performed when the
associated namespace is used as a qualifier (6.4.3.2) except that:
(4.1) ...
(4.2) Any namespace-scope friend functions or friend function templates declared in associated classes are
visible within their respective namespaces even if they are not visible during an ordinary lookup (14.3).
- (4.3) ...
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53409706%2fshould-a-using-declaration-be-able-to-refer-to-a-friend-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
MSVC is wrong here. When a friend function is defined inline within a class definition and not declared outside, it should not be found by normal name lookup and only Argument-Dependent Lookup should be able to find it.
Quoting C++17 (n4659):
14.3 [class.friend]
6 A function can be defined in a friend declaration of a class if and only if the class is a non-local class (12.4),
the function name is unqualified, and the function has namespace scope. ...
7 Such a function is implicitly an inline function (10.1.6). A
friend
function defined in a class is in the (lexical)
scope of the class in which it is defined. A friend function defined outside the class is not (6.4.1).
and 6.4.2/4 [basic.lookup.argdep]
When considering an associated namespace, the lookup is the same as the lookup performed when the
associated namespace is used as a qualifier (6.4.3.2) except that:
(4.1) ...
(4.2) Any namespace-scope friend functions or friend function templates declared in associated classes are
visible within their respective namespaces even if they are not visible during an ordinary lookup (14.3).
- (4.3) ...
add a comment |
MSVC is wrong here. When a friend function is defined inline within a class definition and not declared outside, it should not be found by normal name lookup and only Argument-Dependent Lookup should be able to find it.
Quoting C++17 (n4659):
14.3 [class.friend]
6 A function can be defined in a friend declaration of a class if and only if the class is a non-local class (12.4),
the function name is unqualified, and the function has namespace scope. ...
7 Such a function is implicitly an inline function (10.1.6). A
friend
function defined in a class is in the (lexical)
scope of the class in which it is defined. A friend function defined outside the class is not (6.4.1).
and 6.4.2/4 [basic.lookup.argdep]
When considering an associated namespace, the lookup is the same as the lookup performed when the
associated namespace is used as a qualifier (6.4.3.2) except that:
(4.1) ...
(4.2) Any namespace-scope friend functions or friend function templates declared in associated classes are
visible within their respective namespaces even if they are not visible during an ordinary lookup (14.3).
- (4.3) ...
add a comment |
MSVC is wrong here. When a friend function is defined inline within a class definition and not declared outside, it should not be found by normal name lookup and only Argument-Dependent Lookup should be able to find it.
Quoting C++17 (n4659):
14.3 [class.friend]
6 A function can be defined in a friend declaration of a class if and only if the class is a non-local class (12.4),
the function name is unqualified, and the function has namespace scope. ...
7 Such a function is implicitly an inline function (10.1.6). A
friend
function defined in a class is in the (lexical)
scope of the class in which it is defined. A friend function defined outside the class is not (6.4.1).
and 6.4.2/4 [basic.lookup.argdep]
When considering an associated namespace, the lookup is the same as the lookup performed when the
associated namespace is used as a qualifier (6.4.3.2) except that:
(4.1) ...
(4.2) Any namespace-scope friend functions or friend function templates declared in associated classes are
visible within their respective namespaces even if they are not visible during an ordinary lookup (14.3).
- (4.3) ...
MSVC is wrong here. When a friend function is defined inline within a class definition and not declared outside, it should not be found by normal name lookup and only Argument-Dependent Lookup should be able to find it.
Quoting C++17 (n4659):
14.3 [class.friend]
6 A function can be defined in a friend declaration of a class if and only if the class is a non-local class (12.4),
the function name is unqualified, and the function has namespace scope. ...
7 Such a function is implicitly an inline function (10.1.6). A
friend
function defined in a class is in the (lexical)
scope of the class in which it is defined. A friend function defined outside the class is not (6.4.1).
and 6.4.2/4 [basic.lookup.argdep]
When considering an associated namespace, the lookup is the same as the lookup performed when the
associated namespace is used as a qualifier (6.4.3.2) except that:
(4.1) ...
(4.2) Any namespace-scope friend functions or friend function templates declared in associated classes are
visible within their respective namespaces even if they are not visible during an ordinary lookup (14.3).
- (4.3) ...
edited Nov 21 '18 at 10:22
answered Nov 21 '18 at 10:16
AngewAngew
133k11258350
133k11258350
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53409706%2fshould-a-using-declaration-be-able-to-refer-to-a-friend-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
friend
functions defined inline in a class can only be found through ADL for that class, so MSVC is wrong here.– Quentin
Nov 21 '18 at 10:15