Save the current state of docker image and export to another server
I am new to docker and containers.
I followed the below steps to migrate my postgres database running on a docker container:
docker save -o <path for generated tar file> <image name>
scp root@192.10.1.5:/images/gpdb.tar root@192.10.2.5:/images
In the destination server (192.10.2.5):
docker load -i /images/gpdb.tar
But, when I login to the docker image, the database is not there.
How do I save the docker image with all database tables and data.
docker
add a comment |
I am new to docker and containers.
I followed the below steps to migrate my postgres database running on a docker container:
docker save -o <path for generated tar file> <image name>
scp root@192.10.1.5:/images/gpdb.tar root@192.10.2.5:/images
In the destination server (192.10.2.5):
docker load -i /images/gpdb.tar
But, when I login to the docker image, the database is not there.
How do I save the docker image with all database tables and data.
docker
add a comment |
I am new to docker and containers.
I followed the below steps to migrate my postgres database running on a docker container:
docker save -o <path for generated tar file> <image name>
scp root@192.10.1.5:/images/gpdb.tar root@192.10.2.5:/images
In the destination server (192.10.2.5):
docker load -i /images/gpdb.tar
But, when I login to the docker image, the database is not there.
How do I save the docker image with all database tables and data.
docker
I am new to docker and containers.
I followed the below steps to migrate my postgres database running on a docker container:
docker save -o <path for generated tar file> <image name>
scp root@192.10.1.5:/images/gpdb.tar root@192.10.2.5:/images
In the destination server (192.10.2.5):
docker load -i /images/gpdb.tar
But, when I login to the docker image, the database is not there.
How do I save the docker image with all database tables and data.
docker
docker
asked Nov 13 at 7:20
Tammy
562926
562926
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
There's no database because the docker save
and docker commit
commands don't save the container volumes...
Here's a script to do just that:
https://github.com/ricardobranco777/docker-volumes.sh
# Stop the container
docker stop $CONTAINER
# Create a new image
docker commit $CONTAINER $CONTAINER
# Save and load image to another host
docker save $CONTAINER | ssh $USER@$HOST docker load
# Save the volumes (use ".tar.gz" if you want compression)
docker-volumes.sh $CONTAINER save $CONTAINER-volumes.tar
# Copy image and volumes to another host
scp $CONTAINER.tar $CONTAINER-volumes.tar $USER@$HOST:
### On the other host:
# Create container with the same options used by the previous container
docker create --name $CONTAINER [<PREVIOUS CONTAINER OPTIONS>] $CONTAINER
# Load the volumes
docker-volumes.sh $CONTAINER load $CONTAINER-volumes.tar
# Start container
docker start $CONTAINER
Thanks. Now I have a new question that how the container maintains its current state if it does not alter the image. But, it will be a reading task for me.
– Tammy
Nov 13 at 10:48
1
Thedocker commit
command save any changes made to the container in directories that are not volumes. The script saves and loads the volumes.
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:53
add a comment |
Your container was based on image when start, but after start, all changes will not affect image.
So all your changes including database if made on the runtime of container need to be commit to form a new docker image before save.
Something like follows, see here
docker commit [OPTIONS] CONTAINER [REPOSITORY[:TAG]]
Then save the new image to tar, and do what you wanted.
This doesn't save the container volumes.
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:32
you are true if op has volume
– lagom
Nov 13 at 10:37
Any database container will have volumes...
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:51
maybe k8s or --link?
– lagom
Nov 13 at 10:54
k8s or--link
is not the case here.
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:55
add a comment |
commit the current state to the image
docker commit currentcontainer newimage
save image as a tar file
docker save newimage > /tmp/newimage.tar
load the container from the image
docker load < /tmp/newimage.tar
add a comment |
Trying to move a container like this is not a best practice. It may take some setup to get your container into the right state, though.
The important detail is that all data that could change and needs to be persisted needs to be stored outside the container. While Docker endorses named volumes for this, using a native filesystem path is IME easier to maintain and move around. You need to know where inside the container the data goes (it's usually well-documented) but then you can run commands like
docker run -v /data/mysql:/var/lib/mysql/data ... mysql
Now you can do whatever you want with the container, even docker rm
it, but just so long as /data/mysql
on your host is intact your data is fine. That also means you can use an ordinary scp
to copy the data to some other host and docker run
the same container there, which is the more typical migration path.
If you're building and running custom images, there are a couple of things to check:
You really should be using some sort of Docker registry, whether that's Docker Hub, something your cloud provider offers, something third-party, or something self-hosted.
docker save
to move images around is a last resort that's rarely needed.The images themselves should be built from Dockerfiles and, like the rest of your application, be checked into source control. Ideally you have an automated build system (continuous integration) running
docker build && docker push
for you. Never usedocker commit
ordocker export
: they are a recipe for getting different versions of software on different systems and not remembering how you got there.Your application should minimize the amount of data it stores locally. Best case is to store everything in an external database, and then you can just point at the database; if local file storage is really unavoidable try to contain it all in a single directory that's not within your application's source tree.
Locally you should be freely able to
docker stop; docker rm; docker run
the same container and not lose data. Test this before you need to do a cross-host migration.
If you can structure your application so that all of its data is in an external database, consider running the database on a dedicated host with extremely good backup procedures. If you've done everything up to here, you can have a massive coordinated hard disk failure and lose all of your Docker hosts, and not actually have lost anything (because you can docker build
the images from source again, and docker run
the containers, and the data is off-host).
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53275779%2fsave-the-current-state-of-docker-image-and-export-to-another-server%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There's no database because the docker save
and docker commit
commands don't save the container volumes...
Here's a script to do just that:
https://github.com/ricardobranco777/docker-volumes.sh
# Stop the container
docker stop $CONTAINER
# Create a new image
docker commit $CONTAINER $CONTAINER
# Save and load image to another host
docker save $CONTAINER | ssh $USER@$HOST docker load
# Save the volumes (use ".tar.gz" if you want compression)
docker-volumes.sh $CONTAINER save $CONTAINER-volumes.tar
# Copy image and volumes to another host
scp $CONTAINER.tar $CONTAINER-volumes.tar $USER@$HOST:
### On the other host:
# Create container with the same options used by the previous container
docker create --name $CONTAINER [<PREVIOUS CONTAINER OPTIONS>] $CONTAINER
# Load the volumes
docker-volumes.sh $CONTAINER load $CONTAINER-volumes.tar
# Start container
docker start $CONTAINER
Thanks. Now I have a new question that how the container maintains its current state if it does not alter the image. But, it will be a reading task for me.
– Tammy
Nov 13 at 10:48
1
Thedocker commit
command save any changes made to the container in directories that are not volumes. The script saves and loads the volumes.
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:53
add a comment |
There's no database because the docker save
and docker commit
commands don't save the container volumes...
Here's a script to do just that:
https://github.com/ricardobranco777/docker-volumes.sh
# Stop the container
docker stop $CONTAINER
# Create a new image
docker commit $CONTAINER $CONTAINER
# Save and load image to another host
docker save $CONTAINER | ssh $USER@$HOST docker load
# Save the volumes (use ".tar.gz" if you want compression)
docker-volumes.sh $CONTAINER save $CONTAINER-volumes.tar
# Copy image and volumes to another host
scp $CONTAINER.tar $CONTAINER-volumes.tar $USER@$HOST:
### On the other host:
# Create container with the same options used by the previous container
docker create --name $CONTAINER [<PREVIOUS CONTAINER OPTIONS>] $CONTAINER
# Load the volumes
docker-volumes.sh $CONTAINER load $CONTAINER-volumes.tar
# Start container
docker start $CONTAINER
Thanks. Now I have a new question that how the container maintains its current state if it does not alter the image. But, it will be a reading task for me.
– Tammy
Nov 13 at 10:48
1
Thedocker commit
command save any changes made to the container in directories that are not volumes. The script saves and loads the volumes.
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:53
add a comment |
There's no database because the docker save
and docker commit
commands don't save the container volumes...
Here's a script to do just that:
https://github.com/ricardobranco777/docker-volumes.sh
# Stop the container
docker stop $CONTAINER
# Create a new image
docker commit $CONTAINER $CONTAINER
# Save and load image to another host
docker save $CONTAINER | ssh $USER@$HOST docker load
# Save the volumes (use ".tar.gz" if you want compression)
docker-volumes.sh $CONTAINER save $CONTAINER-volumes.tar
# Copy image and volumes to another host
scp $CONTAINER.tar $CONTAINER-volumes.tar $USER@$HOST:
### On the other host:
# Create container with the same options used by the previous container
docker create --name $CONTAINER [<PREVIOUS CONTAINER OPTIONS>] $CONTAINER
# Load the volumes
docker-volumes.sh $CONTAINER load $CONTAINER-volumes.tar
# Start container
docker start $CONTAINER
There's no database because the docker save
and docker commit
commands don't save the container volumes...
Here's a script to do just that:
https://github.com/ricardobranco777/docker-volumes.sh
# Stop the container
docker stop $CONTAINER
# Create a new image
docker commit $CONTAINER $CONTAINER
# Save and load image to another host
docker save $CONTAINER | ssh $USER@$HOST docker load
# Save the volumes (use ".tar.gz" if you want compression)
docker-volumes.sh $CONTAINER save $CONTAINER-volumes.tar
# Copy image and volumes to another host
scp $CONTAINER.tar $CONTAINER-volumes.tar $USER@$HOST:
### On the other host:
# Create container with the same options used by the previous container
docker create --name $CONTAINER [<PREVIOUS CONTAINER OPTIONS>] $CONTAINER
# Load the volumes
docker-volumes.sh $CONTAINER load $CONTAINER-volumes.tar
# Start container
docker start $CONTAINER
answered Nov 13 at 9:26
Ricardo Branco
3,2121614
3,2121614
Thanks. Now I have a new question that how the container maintains its current state if it does not alter the image. But, it will be a reading task for me.
– Tammy
Nov 13 at 10:48
1
Thedocker commit
command save any changes made to the container in directories that are not volumes. The script saves and loads the volumes.
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:53
add a comment |
Thanks. Now I have a new question that how the container maintains its current state if it does not alter the image. But, it will be a reading task for me.
– Tammy
Nov 13 at 10:48
1
Thedocker commit
command save any changes made to the container in directories that are not volumes. The script saves and loads the volumes.
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:53
Thanks. Now I have a new question that how the container maintains its current state if it does not alter the image. But, it will be a reading task for me.
– Tammy
Nov 13 at 10:48
Thanks. Now I have a new question that how the container maintains its current state if it does not alter the image. But, it will be a reading task for me.
– Tammy
Nov 13 at 10:48
1
1
The
docker commit
command save any changes made to the container in directories that are not volumes. The script saves and loads the volumes.– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:53
The
docker commit
command save any changes made to the container in directories that are not volumes. The script saves and loads the volumes.– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:53
add a comment |
Your container was based on image when start, but after start, all changes will not affect image.
So all your changes including database if made on the runtime of container need to be commit to form a new docker image before save.
Something like follows, see here
docker commit [OPTIONS] CONTAINER [REPOSITORY[:TAG]]
Then save the new image to tar, and do what you wanted.
This doesn't save the container volumes.
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:32
you are true if op has volume
– lagom
Nov 13 at 10:37
Any database container will have volumes...
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:51
maybe k8s or --link?
– lagom
Nov 13 at 10:54
k8s or--link
is not the case here.
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:55
add a comment |
Your container was based on image when start, but after start, all changes will not affect image.
So all your changes including database if made on the runtime of container need to be commit to form a new docker image before save.
Something like follows, see here
docker commit [OPTIONS] CONTAINER [REPOSITORY[:TAG]]
Then save the new image to tar, and do what you wanted.
This doesn't save the container volumes.
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:32
you are true if op has volume
– lagom
Nov 13 at 10:37
Any database container will have volumes...
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:51
maybe k8s or --link?
– lagom
Nov 13 at 10:54
k8s or--link
is not the case here.
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:55
add a comment |
Your container was based on image when start, but after start, all changes will not affect image.
So all your changes including database if made on the runtime of container need to be commit to form a new docker image before save.
Something like follows, see here
docker commit [OPTIONS] CONTAINER [REPOSITORY[:TAG]]
Then save the new image to tar, and do what you wanted.
Your container was based on image when start, but after start, all changes will not affect image.
So all your changes including database if made on the runtime of container need to be commit to form a new docker image before save.
Something like follows, see here
docker commit [OPTIONS] CONTAINER [REPOSITORY[:TAG]]
Then save the new image to tar, and do what you wanted.
answered Nov 13 at 7:49
lagom
3,42671737
3,42671737
This doesn't save the container volumes.
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:32
you are true if op has volume
– lagom
Nov 13 at 10:37
Any database container will have volumes...
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:51
maybe k8s or --link?
– lagom
Nov 13 at 10:54
k8s or--link
is not the case here.
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:55
add a comment |
This doesn't save the container volumes.
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:32
you are true if op has volume
– lagom
Nov 13 at 10:37
Any database container will have volumes...
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:51
maybe k8s or --link?
– lagom
Nov 13 at 10:54
k8s or--link
is not the case here.
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:55
This doesn't save the container volumes.
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:32
This doesn't save the container volumes.
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:32
you are true if op has volume
– lagom
Nov 13 at 10:37
you are true if op has volume
– lagom
Nov 13 at 10:37
Any database container will have volumes...
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:51
Any database container will have volumes...
– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:51
maybe k8s or --link?
– lagom
Nov 13 at 10:54
maybe k8s or --link?
– lagom
Nov 13 at 10:54
k8s or
--link
is not the case here.– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:55
k8s or
--link
is not the case here.– Ricardo Branco
Nov 13 at 10:55
add a comment |
commit the current state to the image
docker commit currentcontainer newimage
save image as a tar file
docker save newimage > /tmp/newimage.tar
load the container from the image
docker load < /tmp/newimage.tar
add a comment |
commit the current state to the image
docker commit currentcontainer newimage
save image as a tar file
docker save newimage > /tmp/newimage.tar
load the container from the image
docker load < /tmp/newimage.tar
add a comment |
commit the current state to the image
docker commit currentcontainer newimage
save image as a tar file
docker save newimage > /tmp/newimage.tar
load the container from the image
docker load < /tmp/newimage.tar
commit the current state to the image
docker commit currentcontainer newimage
save image as a tar file
docker save newimage > /tmp/newimage.tar
load the container from the image
docker load < /tmp/newimage.tar
answered Nov 13 at 9:20
marekmuratow
12910
12910
add a comment |
add a comment |
Trying to move a container like this is not a best practice. It may take some setup to get your container into the right state, though.
The important detail is that all data that could change and needs to be persisted needs to be stored outside the container. While Docker endorses named volumes for this, using a native filesystem path is IME easier to maintain and move around. You need to know where inside the container the data goes (it's usually well-documented) but then you can run commands like
docker run -v /data/mysql:/var/lib/mysql/data ... mysql
Now you can do whatever you want with the container, even docker rm
it, but just so long as /data/mysql
on your host is intact your data is fine. That also means you can use an ordinary scp
to copy the data to some other host and docker run
the same container there, which is the more typical migration path.
If you're building and running custom images, there are a couple of things to check:
You really should be using some sort of Docker registry, whether that's Docker Hub, something your cloud provider offers, something third-party, or something self-hosted.
docker save
to move images around is a last resort that's rarely needed.The images themselves should be built from Dockerfiles and, like the rest of your application, be checked into source control. Ideally you have an automated build system (continuous integration) running
docker build && docker push
for you. Never usedocker commit
ordocker export
: they are a recipe for getting different versions of software on different systems and not remembering how you got there.Your application should minimize the amount of data it stores locally. Best case is to store everything in an external database, and then you can just point at the database; if local file storage is really unavoidable try to contain it all in a single directory that's not within your application's source tree.
Locally you should be freely able to
docker stop; docker rm; docker run
the same container and not lose data. Test this before you need to do a cross-host migration.
If you can structure your application so that all of its data is in an external database, consider running the database on a dedicated host with extremely good backup procedures. If you've done everything up to here, you can have a massive coordinated hard disk failure and lose all of your Docker hosts, and not actually have lost anything (because you can docker build
the images from source again, and docker run
the containers, and the data is off-host).
add a comment |
Trying to move a container like this is not a best practice. It may take some setup to get your container into the right state, though.
The important detail is that all data that could change and needs to be persisted needs to be stored outside the container. While Docker endorses named volumes for this, using a native filesystem path is IME easier to maintain and move around. You need to know where inside the container the data goes (it's usually well-documented) but then you can run commands like
docker run -v /data/mysql:/var/lib/mysql/data ... mysql
Now you can do whatever you want with the container, even docker rm
it, but just so long as /data/mysql
on your host is intact your data is fine. That also means you can use an ordinary scp
to copy the data to some other host and docker run
the same container there, which is the more typical migration path.
If you're building and running custom images, there are a couple of things to check:
You really should be using some sort of Docker registry, whether that's Docker Hub, something your cloud provider offers, something third-party, or something self-hosted.
docker save
to move images around is a last resort that's rarely needed.The images themselves should be built from Dockerfiles and, like the rest of your application, be checked into source control. Ideally you have an automated build system (continuous integration) running
docker build && docker push
for you. Never usedocker commit
ordocker export
: they are a recipe for getting different versions of software on different systems and not remembering how you got there.Your application should minimize the amount of data it stores locally. Best case is to store everything in an external database, and then you can just point at the database; if local file storage is really unavoidable try to contain it all in a single directory that's not within your application's source tree.
Locally you should be freely able to
docker stop; docker rm; docker run
the same container and not lose data. Test this before you need to do a cross-host migration.
If you can structure your application so that all of its data is in an external database, consider running the database on a dedicated host with extremely good backup procedures. If you've done everything up to here, you can have a massive coordinated hard disk failure and lose all of your Docker hosts, and not actually have lost anything (because you can docker build
the images from source again, and docker run
the containers, and the data is off-host).
add a comment |
Trying to move a container like this is not a best practice. It may take some setup to get your container into the right state, though.
The important detail is that all data that could change and needs to be persisted needs to be stored outside the container. While Docker endorses named volumes for this, using a native filesystem path is IME easier to maintain and move around. You need to know where inside the container the data goes (it's usually well-documented) but then you can run commands like
docker run -v /data/mysql:/var/lib/mysql/data ... mysql
Now you can do whatever you want with the container, even docker rm
it, but just so long as /data/mysql
on your host is intact your data is fine. That also means you can use an ordinary scp
to copy the data to some other host and docker run
the same container there, which is the more typical migration path.
If you're building and running custom images, there are a couple of things to check:
You really should be using some sort of Docker registry, whether that's Docker Hub, something your cloud provider offers, something third-party, or something self-hosted.
docker save
to move images around is a last resort that's rarely needed.The images themselves should be built from Dockerfiles and, like the rest of your application, be checked into source control. Ideally you have an automated build system (continuous integration) running
docker build && docker push
for you. Never usedocker commit
ordocker export
: they are a recipe for getting different versions of software on different systems and not remembering how you got there.Your application should minimize the amount of data it stores locally. Best case is to store everything in an external database, and then you can just point at the database; if local file storage is really unavoidable try to contain it all in a single directory that's not within your application's source tree.
Locally you should be freely able to
docker stop; docker rm; docker run
the same container and not lose data. Test this before you need to do a cross-host migration.
If you can structure your application so that all of its data is in an external database, consider running the database on a dedicated host with extremely good backup procedures. If you've done everything up to here, you can have a massive coordinated hard disk failure and lose all of your Docker hosts, and not actually have lost anything (because you can docker build
the images from source again, and docker run
the containers, and the data is off-host).
Trying to move a container like this is not a best practice. It may take some setup to get your container into the right state, though.
The important detail is that all data that could change and needs to be persisted needs to be stored outside the container. While Docker endorses named volumes for this, using a native filesystem path is IME easier to maintain and move around. You need to know where inside the container the data goes (it's usually well-documented) but then you can run commands like
docker run -v /data/mysql:/var/lib/mysql/data ... mysql
Now you can do whatever you want with the container, even docker rm
it, but just so long as /data/mysql
on your host is intact your data is fine. That also means you can use an ordinary scp
to copy the data to some other host and docker run
the same container there, which is the more typical migration path.
If you're building and running custom images, there are a couple of things to check:
You really should be using some sort of Docker registry, whether that's Docker Hub, something your cloud provider offers, something third-party, or something self-hosted.
docker save
to move images around is a last resort that's rarely needed.The images themselves should be built from Dockerfiles and, like the rest of your application, be checked into source control. Ideally you have an automated build system (continuous integration) running
docker build && docker push
for you. Never usedocker commit
ordocker export
: they are a recipe for getting different versions of software on different systems and not remembering how you got there.Your application should minimize the amount of data it stores locally. Best case is to store everything in an external database, and then you can just point at the database; if local file storage is really unavoidable try to contain it all in a single directory that's not within your application's source tree.
Locally you should be freely able to
docker stop; docker rm; docker run
the same container and not lose data. Test this before you need to do a cross-host migration.
If you can structure your application so that all of its data is in an external database, consider running the database on a dedicated host with extremely good backup procedures. If you've done everything up to here, you can have a massive coordinated hard disk failure and lose all of your Docker hosts, and not actually have lost anything (because you can docker build
the images from source again, and docker run
the containers, and the data is off-host).
answered Nov 13 at 12:07
David Maze
10.1k2921
10.1k2921
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53275779%2fsave-the-current-state-of-docker-image-and-export-to-another-server%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown