Why does memory leak after large file download in Ruby?












2














I have some Ruby that is downloading a large XML file (~ 380MB).



I'm using on_body to download it in chunks:



to = File.open('/path', 'wb')

http = HTTPI::Request.new(options)
http.url = uri
http.on_body { |chunk| to.write(chunk) }

HTTPI.get(http, :net_http)

to.close


on_body, according to its documentation (https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/httpi/HTTPI/Request#on_body-instance_method) will read the response in chunks, to prevent filling up memory.



This seems to work, in practice my memory usage jumps up about ~178 MB after downloading the file, so some garbage collection appears to happen while the file is being streamed, or else I would expect it to jump by the full file size.



However, afterwords, that 178MB just hangs around forever.



I've narrowed it down to being due to the file download. If I read the same XML file from disk, memory has only increased by about 4MB after I'm finished processing the file.










share|improve this question
























  • because you didn't close the file ??? try adding to.close
    – engineersmnky
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:09










  • @engineersmnky I should have included that in the code sample - I do close it. (I've added it to the sample now)
    – Zachary Wright
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:17












  • For what it's worth, closing vs not closing doesn't have any impact on the memory usage.
    – Zachary Wright
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:24










  • Are you sure it hangs around forever maybe GC just hasn't gotten to it yet
    – engineersmnky
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:25






  • 1




    Garbage collection frees memory for re-use by Ruby. Releasing memory to the OS is something else. sitepoint.com/ruby-uses-memory explains it better than I can.
    – steenslag
    Nov 15 '18 at 19:56
















2














I have some Ruby that is downloading a large XML file (~ 380MB).



I'm using on_body to download it in chunks:



to = File.open('/path', 'wb')

http = HTTPI::Request.new(options)
http.url = uri
http.on_body { |chunk| to.write(chunk) }

HTTPI.get(http, :net_http)

to.close


on_body, according to its documentation (https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/httpi/HTTPI/Request#on_body-instance_method) will read the response in chunks, to prevent filling up memory.



This seems to work, in practice my memory usage jumps up about ~178 MB after downloading the file, so some garbage collection appears to happen while the file is being streamed, or else I would expect it to jump by the full file size.



However, afterwords, that 178MB just hangs around forever.



I've narrowed it down to being due to the file download. If I read the same XML file from disk, memory has only increased by about 4MB after I'm finished processing the file.










share|improve this question
























  • because you didn't close the file ??? try adding to.close
    – engineersmnky
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:09










  • @engineersmnky I should have included that in the code sample - I do close it. (I've added it to the sample now)
    – Zachary Wright
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:17












  • For what it's worth, closing vs not closing doesn't have any impact on the memory usage.
    – Zachary Wright
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:24










  • Are you sure it hangs around forever maybe GC just hasn't gotten to it yet
    – engineersmnky
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:25






  • 1




    Garbage collection frees memory for re-use by Ruby. Releasing memory to the OS is something else. sitepoint.com/ruby-uses-memory explains it better than I can.
    – steenslag
    Nov 15 '18 at 19:56














2












2








2







I have some Ruby that is downloading a large XML file (~ 380MB).



I'm using on_body to download it in chunks:



to = File.open('/path', 'wb')

http = HTTPI::Request.new(options)
http.url = uri
http.on_body { |chunk| to.write(chunk) }

HTTPI.get(http, :net_http)

to.close


on_body, according to its documentation (https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/httpi/HTTPI/Request#on_body-instance_method) will read the response in chunks, to prevent filling up memory.



This seems to work, in practice my memory usage jumps up about ~178 MB after downloading the file, so some garbage collection appears to happen while the file is being streamed, or else I would expect it to jump by the full file size.



However, afterwords, that 178MB just hangs around forever.



I've narrowed it down to being due to the file download. If I read the same XML file from disk, memory has only increased by about 4MB after I'm finished processing the file.










share|improve this question















I have some Ruby that is downloading a large XML file (~ 380MB).



I'm using on_body to download it in chunks:



to = File.open('/path', 'wb')

http = HTTPI::Request.new(options)
http.url = uri
http.on_body { |chunk| to.write(chunk) }

HTTPI.get(http, :net_http)

to.close


on_body, according to its documentation (https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/httpi/HTTPI/Request#on_body-instance_method) will read the response in chunks, to prevent filling up memory.



This seems to work, in practice my memory usage jumps up about ~178 MB after downloading the file, so some garbage collection appears to happen while the file is being streamed, or else I would expect it to jump by the full file size.



However, afterwords, that 178MB just hangs around forever.



I've narrowed it down to being due to the file download. If I read the same XML file from disk, memory has only increased by about 4MB after I'm finished processing the file.







ruby performance memory memory-leaks






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 15 '18 at 18:31







Zachary Wright

















asked Nov 15 '18 at 16:47









Zachary WrightZachary Wright

14.7k93546




14.7k93546












  • because you didn't close the file ??? try adding to.close
    – engineersmnky
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:09










  • @engineersmnky I should have included that in the code sample - I do close it. (I've added it to the sample now)
    – Zachary Wright
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:17












  • For what it's worth, closing vs not closing doesn't have any impact on the memory usage.
    – Zachary Wright
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:24










  • Are you sure it hangs around forever maybe GC just hasn't gotten to it yet
    – engineersmnky
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:25






  • 1




    Garbage collection frees memory for re-use by Ruby. Releasing memory to the OS is something else. sitepoint.com/ruby-uses-memory explains it better than I can.
    – steenslag
    Nov 15 '18 at 19:56


















  • because you didn't close the file ??? try adding to.close
    – engineersmnky
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:09










  • @engineersmnky I should have included that in the code sample - I do close it. (I've added it to the sample now)
    – Zachary Wright
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:17












  • For what it's worth, closing vs not closing doesn't have any impact on the memory usage.
    – Zachary Wright
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:24










  • Are you sure it hangs around forever maybe GC just hasn't gotten to it yet
    – engineersmnky
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:25






  • 1




    Garbage collection frees memory for re-use by Ruby. Releasing memory to the OS is something else. sitepoint.com/ruby-uses-memory explains it better than I can.
    – steenslag
    Nov 15 '18 at 19:56
















because you didn't close the file ??? try adding to.close
– engineersmnky
Nov 15 '18 at 17:09




because you didn't close the file ??? try adding to.close
– engineersmnky
Nov 15 '18 at 17:09












@engineersmnky I should have included that in the code sample - I do close it. (I've added it to the sample now)
– Zachary Wright
Nov 15 '18 at 17:17






@engineersmnky I should have included that in the code sample - I do close it. (I've added it to the sample now)
– Zachary Wright
Nov 15 '18 at 17:17














For what it's worth, closing vs not closing doesn't have any impact on the memory usage.
– Zachary Wright
Nov 15 '18 at 17:24




For what it's worth, closing vs not closing doesn't have any impact on the memory usage.
– Zachary Wright
Nov 15 '18 at 17:24












Are you sure it hangs around forever maybe GC just hasn't gotten to it yet
– engineersmnky
Nov 15 '18 at 17:25




Are you sure it hangs around forever maybe GC just hasn't gotten to it yet
– engineersmnky
Nov 15 '18 at 17:25




1




1




Garbage collection frees memory for re-use by Ruby. Releasing memory to the OS is something else. sitepoint.com/ruby-uses-memory explains it better than I can.
– steenslag
Nov 15 '18 at 19:56




Garbage collection frees memory for re-use by Ruby. Releasing memory to the OS is something else. sitepoint.com/ruby-uses-memory explains it better than I can.
– steenslag
Nov 15 '18 at 19:56












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53324201%2fwhy-does-memory-leak-after-large-file-download-in-ruby%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53324201%2fwhy-does-memory-leak-after-large-file-download-in-ruby%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Guess what letter conforming each word

Port of Spain

Run scheduled task as local user group (not BUILTIN)