Burke's Peerage







"Burke's" and "Burkes" redirect here. For other uses, see Burke.


































Burke's Peerage Limited
Type
 Private limited company
Industry Publishing
Predecessor Burke's Peerage (1826) Limited (2013–2016)
Founded 1826; 193 years ago (1826) in London, England
Founder John Burke
Headquarters

Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
,
England
Website burkespeerage.com

Burke's Peerage Limited is a British genealogical publisher founded in 1826, when Irish genealogist John Burke began releasing books devoted to the ancestry and heraldry of the peerage, baronetage, knightage and landed gentry of the United Kingdom. His first publication, a Genealogical and Heraldic Dictionary of the Peerage and Baronetage of the United Kingdom, was updated sporadically until 1847, when the company began releasing new editions every year as Burke's Peerage, Baronetage and Knightage (often shortened to just Burke's Peerage). Other books followed, including Burke's Landed Gentry, Burke's Colonial Gentry, and Burke's General Armory. In addition to the peerage, Burke's published books on royal families of Europe and Latin America, ruling families of Africa and the Middle East, distinguished families of the United States and historical families of Ireland.




Contents






  • 1 History


  • 2 Criticism


  • 3 See also


  • 4 References


  • 5 External links


  • 6 Online Editions





History



The firm was established in 1826 by John Burke (1786–1848), progenitor of a dynasty of genealogists and heralds. His son Sir John Bernard Burke (1814–92) was Ulster King of Arms (1853–92) and his grandson, Sir Henry Farnham Burke (1859–1930), was Garter Principal King of Arms (1919–30). After his death, ownership passed through a variety of people.





A Genealogical and Heraldic Dictionary of the Peerage and Baronetage of the British Empire, Sixth Edition 1839 (known better simply as Burke's Peerage)


Apart from the Burke family, editors have included Arthur Charles Fox-Davies, Alfred Trego Butler, Leslie Gilbert Pine, and Hugh Montgomery-Massingberd.



Criticism


From the start, Burke's works suffered from pomposity and carelessness. Readers may have accepted as a minor eccentricity of style the idolisation of medieval figures who were little more than brigands and the ludicrously reverential tone adopted towards otherwise insignificant people who happened to possess a title or were related to a titled person. The major fault of substance, however, was the frequent and evident inaccuracy of the articles. Without much knowledge of history or genealogy, one could see improbabilities and inconsistencies both within articles and between articles. Errors in existing articles remained uncorrected between editions and new errors were added in new articles. A very minor example can be found as late as 1953, where the article on the Baden-Powell barony contained a statement about the relationship of the first baron (died 1941) to the family of the first Earl Nelson (died 1835) which was not supported by the article on the Nelson earldom, because there was no relationship and the statement was untrue.[1][2] When such carelessness was shown over relatively recent links, what hope had readers of finding accurate guidance over titles with complicated ascents going back to remote medieval times?





Sir John Bernard Burke,
Burke's Peerage frontispiece (62nd edition, 1900)


Serious scholars have always taken little account of Burke's books, exposing their flaws from time to time. In 1877, the Oxford professor Edward Augustus Freeman attacked in language of almost unexampled scorn, the fables and the fictions in Burke's,[3] where he could readily find a pedigree that was purely mythical – if indeed mythical is not too respectable a name for what must be in many cases the work of deliberate invention …. (and) all but invariably false. As a rule, it is not only false, but impossible … not merely fictions, but exactly that kind of fiction which is, in its beginning, deliberate and interested falsehood.[4] The reputation of the imprint in informed circles was well established by 1893 when Oscar Wilde in the play A Woman of No Importance wrote: "You should study the Peerage, Gerald. It is the one book a young man about town should know thoroughly, and it is the best thing in fiction the English have ever done!" Such barbs had little effect for, writing in 1901, the historian J. Horace Round aimed many blows at the old fables and grotesquely impossible tales still being perpetuated by Burke's.[3]



See also



  • Almanach de Gotha

  • Burke’s Landed Gentry

  • Debrett's Peerage & Baronetage

  • European royalty

  • Hereditary peers

  • Life Peers

  • Baronets




Arms of office of Sir Bernard Burke



References





  1. ^ L. G. Pine, ed. (1953), Burke's Peerage (100 ed.), London: Burke's Peerage Ltd, pp. 1544 and 1704.mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit}.mw-parser-output .citation q{quotes:"""""""'""'"}.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-free a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Lock-green.svg/9px-Lock-green.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-registration a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-gray-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-subscription a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-red-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration{color:#555}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration span{border-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help}.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg/12px-Wikisource-logo.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output code.cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:inherit;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{display:none;color:#33aa33;margin-left:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration,.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-right{padding-right:0.2em}


  2. ^ [1]


  3. ^ ab Round, J. Horace (1901), Studies in Peerage and Family History, London, ISBN 0-8063-0426-X, retrieved 25 March 2018


  4. ^ Freeman, Edward A. (June 1877), "Pedigrees and Pedigree-Makers", Contemporary Review, XXX, pp. 11 to 41




External links



  • Burke's Peerage website

  • Burke's Peerage Foundation website

  • College of Arms website

  • Lyon Court website

  • Standing Council of the Baronetage website



Online Editions



  • 1st edition - 1826 - Hathitrust

  • 3rd edition - 1830 - Hathitrust

  • 4th edition - 1832 - Vol 1 - Hathitrust

  • 4th edition - 1832 - Vol 2 - Hathitrust

  • 4th edition - 1832 - Vol 2 - Google Books

  • 4th edition - corrected to 1833 - Vol 2 - Hathitrust

  • 5th edition - 1838 - Google Books

  • 6th edition - 1839 - Hathitrust

  • 7th edition - 1843 - Vol 2 - Hathitrust

  • 10th edition - 1848 - Hathitrust

  • 12th edition - 1850 - Hathitrust

  • 20th edition - 1858 - Hathitrust

  • 22nd edition - 1860 - Hathitrust

  • 23rd edition - 1861 - Hathitrust

  • 27th edition - 1865 - Google Books

  • 30th edition - 1868 - Google Books

  • 30th edition - 1868 - Vol 1 - Hathitrust

  • 30th edition - 1868 - Vol 2 - Hathitrust

  • 31st edition - 1869 - Vol 1 - Hathitrust

  • 31st edition - 1869 - Vol 2 - Hathitrust

  • 37th edition - 1875 - Vol 2 - Hathitrust

  • 48th edition - 1886 - University of Dusseldorf

  • 53rd edition - 1891 - University of Dusseldorf

  • 76th edition - 1914 (to page 1274) - Archive.org

  • 99th edition - 1949 - Archive.org

  • 102nd edition - 1959 - Hathitrust




-

Popular posts from this blog

Guess what letter conforming each word

Image
6 $begingroup$ This is an entry in the Fortnightly Topic Challenge #41: Short and Sweet. 1 letter only could be mean anything . With an additional letter in front , could be used as medicine component and something you definitely learn or at least heard once. Add another letter in front , you would possibly hear that many times . Add an additional letter in front , you would found an independent country . With an additional letter, in the end , you would found something related to apple . Add another letter in the end , you would found something bad . Hint: Each letter is unique . word knowledge letters chemistry share | improve this question ...
Read more

Port of Spain

Image
For ports in the country of Spain, see List of ports in Spain. City in City of Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago Port of Spain City City of Port of Spain Top to bottom (left to right): Skyline of Port of Spain from Gulf of Paria; National Academy for the Performing Arts, Independence Square, Eric Williams Plaza; MovieTowne, Port of Port of Spain Motto(s):  "We Gather Strength As We Go Along" Port of Spain Coordinates: 10°40′N 61°31′W  /  10.667°N 61.517°W  / 10.667; -61.517 Coordinates: 10°40′N 61°31′W  /  10.667°N 61.517°W  / 10.667; -61.517 Country   Trinidad and Tobago Jurisdiction City of Port of Spain Settled 1560 Incorporated (town) 1853 Incorporated (city) 1914 Government  • Mayor Joel Martinez  • Governing body City Corporation Area [1]  • City 12 km 2 (5 sq mi) Elevation [2] 66 m (217 ft) Population (2011) [1]  • City 37,074  • Rank 3rd  • Density 3,090/km 2 (8,000/sq mi)...
Read more

Run scheduled task as local user group (not BUILTIN)

Image
0 I am trying to run a scheduled task with User Group (not a single user). This is working fine when I in the field "when running a task, use the following user account:" insert BUILTIN User Group (for example: Administrators or Users). But when I try it with the created Local User Group (example: TestGroup) it is not working. The Users in the TestGroup are the same as in the Administrators group. What could be the problem? Are there some restrictions to the Created User Group compared to BUILTINUsers? scheduled-tasks taskscheduler windowstaskschedule share | improve this question asked Nov 15 '18 at 15:36 Far...
Read more