Sharp serializer use a custom object constructor?
I was looking for a tool able to serialize object instances without a previous mapping.
I'm trying to build a platform able to transform ERP documents from one system to another, using XML formats to match the properties between the multiple systems.
The problem is that some of the objects instances, do not have a parameter less contructor or a class public constructor, due to permissions and licensing, the new instance of the object is delivered from another managing class, like ManagingClass.GetNew(ERPDocTypeId).
Does anyone know if is it possible using the strategy pattern on the deserializer part of SharpSerializer, which is to use a specific method for the object construction, and then let pass it to the base deserializer?
c# xml serialization xml-serialization
edited Nov 19 '18 at 16:13
dbc
54.1k870123
asked Nov 19 '18 at 11:20
Vitor SilvaVitor Silva
5817
add a comment |
I was looking for a tool able to serialize object instances without a previous mapping.
I'm trying to build a platform able to transform ERP documents from one system to another, using XML formats to match the properties between the multiple systems.
The problem is that some of the objects instances, do not have a parameter less contructor or a class public constructor, due to permissions and licensing, the new instance of the object is delivered from another managing class, like ManagingClass.GetNew(ERPDocTypeId).
Does anyone know if is it possible using the strategy pattern on the deserializer part of SharpSerializer, which is to use a specific method for the object construction, and then let pass it to the base deserializer?
c# xml serialization xml-serialization
edited Nov 19 '18 at 16:13
dbc
54.1k870123
asked Nov 19 '18 at 11:20
Vitor SilvaVitor Silva
5817
I'm a little bit unclear on your problem. Are you 1) UsingSharpSerializerand asking how to construct objects with the factory pattern? 2) Using another serializer, and asking how to construct objects with the factory pattern in the same way thatSharpSerializersupports? And if #2, what serializer are you using?
– dbc
Nov 19 '18 at 16:14
1
It is option 1). Sharpserializer has an option that allows you to use different construction methods for complex objects, this option is InstanceCreator, which allows you to pass a method where it is possible to carry out the type treatment and call the correct constructor. Meanwhile I've figured out how to do it and I'll put the answer here.
– Vitor Silva
Nov 21 '18 at 8:40
add a comment |
I was looking for a tool able to serialize object instances without a previous mapping.
I'm trying to build a platform able to transform ERP documents from one system to another, using XML formats to match the properties between the multiple systems.
The problem is that some of the objects instances, do not have a parameter less contructor or a class public constructor, due to permissions and licensing, the new instance of the object is delivered from another managing class, like ManagingClass.GetNew(ERPDocTypeId).
Does anyone know if is it possible using the strategy pattern on the deserializer part of SharpSerializer, which is to use a specific method for the object construction, and then let pass it to the base deserializer?
c# xml serialization xml-serialization
edited Nov 19 '18 at 16:13
dbc
54.1k870123
asked Nov 19 '18 at 11:20
Vitor SilvaVitor Silva
5817
I was looking for a tool able to serialize object instances without a previous mapping.
I'm trying to build a platform able to transform ERP documents from one system to another, using XML formats to match the properties between the multiple systems.
The problem is that some of the objects instances, do not have a parameter less contructor or a class public constructor, due to permissions and licensing, the new instance of the object is delivered from another managing class, like ManagingClass.GetNew(ERPDocTypeId).
Does anyone know if is it possible using the strategy pattern on the deserializer part of SharpSerializer, which is to use a specific method for the object construction, and then let pass it to the base deserializer?
c# xml serialization xml-serialization
c# xml serialization xml-serialization
edited Nov 19 '18 at 16:13
dbc
54.1k870123
asked Nov 19 '18 at 11:20
Vitor SilvaVitor Silva
5817
edited Nov 19 '18 at 16:13
dbc
54.1k870123
asked Nov 19 '18 at 11:20
Vitor SilvaVitor Silva
5817
edited Nov 19 '18 at 16:13
dbc
54.1k870123
edited Nov 19 '18 at 16:13
dbc
54.1k870123
edited Nov 19 '18 at 16:13
dbc
54.1k870123
54.1k870123
asked Nov 19 '18 at 11:20
Vitor SilvaVitor Silva
5817
asked Nov 19 '18 at 11:20
Vitor SilvaVitor Silva
5817
asked Nov 19 '18 at 11:20
Vitor SilvaVitor Silva
5817
5817
I'm a little bit unclear on your problem. Are you 1) UsingSharpSerializerand asking how to construct objects with the factory pattern? 2) Using another serializer, and asking how to construct objects with the factory pattern in the same way thatSharpSerializersupports? And if #2, what serializer are you using?
– dbc
Nov 19 '18 at 16:14
1
It is option 1). Sharpserializer has an option that allows you to use different construction methods for complex objects, this option is InstanceCreator, which allows you to pass a method where it is possible to carry out the type treatment and call the correct constructor. Meanwhile I've figured out how to do it and I'll put the answer here.
– Vitor Silva
Nov 21 '18 at 8:40
add a comment |
I'm a little bit unclear on your problem. Are you 1) UsingSharpSerializerand asking how to construct objects with the factory pattern? 2) Using another serializer, and asking how to construct objects with the factory pattern in the same way thatSharpSerializersupports? And if #2, what serializer are you using?
– dbc
Nov 19 '18 at 16:14
1
It is option 1). Sharpserializer has an option that allows you to use different construction methods for complex objects, this option is InstanceCreator, which allows you to pass a method where it is possible to carry out the type treatment and call the correct constructor. Meanwhile I've figured out how to do it and I'll put the answer here.
– Vitor Silva
Nov 21 '18 at 8:40
I'm a little bit unclear on your problem. Are you 1) Using
SharpSerializer and asking how to construct objects with the factory pattern? 2) Using another serializer, and asking how to construct objects with the factory pattern in the same way that SharpSerializer supports? And if #2, what serializer are you using?– dbc
Nov 19 '18 at 16:14
I'm a little bit unclear on your problem. Are you 1) Using
SharpSerializer and asking how to construct objects with the factory pattern? 2) Using another serializer, and asking how to construct objects with the factory pattern in the same way that SharpSerializer supports? And if #2, what serializer are you using?– dbc
Nov 19 '18 at 16:14
1
1
It is option 1). Sharpserializer has an option that allows you to use different construction methods for complex objects, this option is InstanceCreator, which allows you to pass a method where it is possible to carry out the type treatment and call the correct constructor. Meanwhile I've figured out how to do it and I'll put the answer here.
– Vitor Silva
Nov 21 '18 at 8:40
It is option 1). Sharpserializer has an option that allows you to use different construction methods for complex objects, this option is InstanceCreator, which allows you to pass a method where it is possible to carry out the type treatment and call the correct constructor. Meanwhile I've figured out how to do it and I'll put the answer here.
– Vitor Silva
Nov 21 '18 at 8:40
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53373535%2fsharp-serializer-use-a-custom-object-constructor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53373535%2fsharp-serializer-use-a-custom-object-constructor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I'm a little bit unclear on your problem. Are you 1) Using
SharpSerializerand asking how to construct objects with the factory pattern? 2) Using another serializer, and asking how to construct objects with the factory pattern in the same way thatSharpSerializersupports? And if #2, what serializer are you using?– dbc
Nov 19 '18 at 16:14
1
It is option 1). Sharpserializer has an option that allows you to use different construction methods for complex objects, this option is InstanceCreator, which allows you to pass a method where it is possible to carry out the type treatment and call the correct constructor. Meanwhile I've figured out how to do it and I'll put the answer here.
– Vitor Silva
Nov 21 '18 at 8:40