Spock - approximate comparisions
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I’ve been looking for the Spock equivalent of the following convenience method in JUnit whereby you can do “approximate” comparisons. Does anyone know if such a thing exists?
/**
* Asserts that two doubles or floats are equal to within a positive delta.
*/
assertEquals(double expected, double actual, double delta)
grails junit spock
add a comment |
I’ve been looking for the Spock equivalent of the following convenience method in JUnit whereby you can do “approximate” comparisons. Does anyone know if such a thing exists?
/**
* Asserts that two doubles or floats are equal to within a positive delta.
*/
assertEquals(double expected, double actual, double delta)
grails junit spock
You may want to use Hamcrest matchers.
– Jeff Scott Brown
Nov 22 '18 at 15:49
add a comment |
I’ve been looking for the Spock equivalent of the following convenience method in JUnit whereby you can do “approximate” comparisons. Does anyone know if such a thing exists?
/**
* Asserts that two doubles or floats are equal to within a positive delta.
*/
assertEquals(double expected, double actual, double delta)
grails junit spock
I’ve been looking for the Spock equivalent of the following convenience method in JUnit whereby you can do “approximate” comparisons. Does anyone know if such a thing exists?
/**
* Asserts that two doubles or floats are equal to within a positive delta.
*/
assertEquals(double expected, double actual, double delta)
grails junit spock
grails junit spock
edited Nov 22 '18 at 23:34
Dónal
124k156487753
124k156487753
asked Nov 22 '18 at 14:19
dredre
4981621
4981621
You may want to use Hamcrest matchers.
– Jeff Scott Brown
Nov 22 '18 at 15:49
add a comment |
You may want to use Hamcrest matchers.
– Jeff Scott Brown
Nov 22 '18 at 15:49
You may want to use Hamcrest matchers.
– Jeff Scott Brown
Nov 22 '18 at 15:49
You may want to use Hamcrest matchers.
– Jeff Scott Brown
Nov 22 '18 at 15:49
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
There is build in function for that, described in official docs:
when:
def x = computeValue()
then:
expect x, closeTo(42, 0.01)
Check the specs.
This answers the question more specifically. Thanks @Michal_Szulc
– dre
Nov 23 '18 at 12:40
See also Spock release notes mentioning Hamcrest support here and there.
– kriegaex
Dec 20 '18 at 6:49
add a comment |
I don't know if there's a Spock equivalent but it's easy to write your own
class Foo extends Specification {
private boolean compareApproximately(Number expected, Number actual, Number delta) {
Math.abs(expected - actual) <= delta
}
def "approximate test"() {
expect:
compareApproximately(4, 4.5, 1)
!compareApproximately(4, 4.5, 0.1)
}
}
In practice, you'd probably want to make compareApproximately
reusable across specs by defining it in a trait, subclass of Specification
, or a static method in a utility class.
1
Ah.. the infamous Murtag! Indeed you are powerful. Internet points for you!!!
– dre
Nov 22 '18 at 16:27
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53432942%2fspock-approximate-comparisions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is build in function for that, described in official docs:
when:
def x = computeValue()
then:
expect x, closeTo(42, 0.01)
Check the specs.
This answers the question more specifically. Thanks @Michal_Szulc
– dre
Nov 23 '18 at 12:40
See also Spock release notes mentioning Hamcrest support here and there.
– kriegaex
Dec 20 '18 at 6:49
add a comment |
There is build in function for that, described in official docs:
when:
def x = computeValue()
then:
expect x, closeTo(42, 0.01)
Check the specs.
This answers the question more specifically. Thanks @Michal_Szulc
– dre
Nov 23 '18 at 12:40
See also Spock release notes mentioning Hamcrest support here and there.
– kriegaex
Dec 20 '18 at 6:49
add a comment |
There is build in function for that, described in official docs:
when:
def x = computeValue()
then:
expect x, closeTo(42, 0.01)
Check the specs.
There is build in function for that, described in official docs:
when:
def x = computeValue()
then:
expect x, closeTo(42, 0.01)
Check the specs.
answered Nov 22 '18 at 20:33
Michal_SzulcMichal_Szulc
2,30832145
2,30832145
This answers the question more specifically. Thanks @Michal_Szulc
– dre
Nov 23 '18 at 12:40
See also Spock release notes mentioning Hamcrest support here and there.
– kriegaex
Dec 20 '18 at 6:49
add a comment |
This answers the question more specifically. Thanks @Michal_Szulc
– dre
Nov 23 '18 at 12:40
See also Spock release notes mentioning Hamcrest support here and there.
– kriegaex
Dec 20 '18 at 6:49
This answers the question more specifically. Thanks @Michal_Szulc
– dre
Nov 23 '18 at 12:40
This answers the question more specifically. Thanks @Michal_Szulc
– dre
Nov 23 '18 at 12:40
See also Spock release notes mentioning Hamcrest support here and there.
– kriegaex
Dec 20 '18 at 6:49
See also Spock release notes mentioning Hamcrest support here and there.
– kriegaex
Dec 20 '18 at 6:49
add a comment |
I don't know if there's a Spock equivalent but it's easy to write your own
class Foo extends Specification {
private boolean compareApproximately(Number expected, Number actual, Number delta) {
Math.abs(expected - actual) <= delta
}
def "approximate test"() {
expect:
compareApproximately(4, 4.5, 1)
!compareApproximately(4, 4.5, 0.1)
}
}
In practice, you'd probably want to make compareApproximately
reusable across specs by defining it in a trait, subclass of Specification
, or a static method in a utility class.
1
Ah.. the infamous Murtag! Indeed you are powerful. Internet points for you!!!
– dre
Nov 22 '18 at 16:27
add a comment |
I don't know if there's a Spock equivalent but it's easy to write your own
class Foo extends Specification {
private boolean compareApproximately(Number expected, Number actual, Number delta) {
Math.abs(expected - actual) <= delta
}
def "approximate test"() {
expect:
compareApproximately(4, 4.5, 1)
!compareApproximately(4, 4.5, 0.1)
}
}
In practice, you'd probably want to make compareApproximately
reusable across specs by defining it in a trait, subclass of Specification
, or a static method in a utility class.
1
Ah.. the infamous Murtag! Indeed you are powerful. Internet points for you!!!
– dre
Nov 22 '18 at 16:27
add a comment |
I don't know if there's a Spock equivalent but it's easy to write your own
class Foo extends Specification {
private boolean compareApproximately(Number expected, Number actual, Number delta) {
Math.abs(expected - actual) <= delta
}
def "approximate test"() {
expect:
compareApproximately(4, 4.5, 1)
!compareApproximately(4, 4.5, 0.1)
}
}
In practice, you'd probably want to make compareApproximately
reusable across specs by defining it in a trait, subclass of Specification
, or a static method in a utility class.
I don't know if there's a Spock equivalent but it's easy to write your own
class Foo extends Specification {
private boolean compareApproximately(Number expected, Number actual, Number delta) {
Math.abs(expected - actual) <= delta
}
def "approximate test"() {
expect:
compareApproximately(4, 4.5, 1)
!compareApproximately(4, 4.5, 0.1)
}
}
In practice, you'd probably want to make compareApproximately
reusable across specs by defining it in a trait, subclass of Specification
, or a static method in a utility class.
edited Nov 22 '18 at 22:20
answered Nov 22 '18 at 16:24
DónalDónal
124k156487753
124k156487753
1
Ah.. the infamous Murtag! Indeed you are powerful. Internet points for you!!!
– dre
Nov 22 '18 at 16:27
add a comment |
1
Ah.. the infamous Murtag! Indeed you are powerful. Internet points for you!!!
– dre
Nov 22 '18 at 16:27
1
1
Ah.. the infamous Murtag! Indeed you are powerful. Internet points for you!!!
– dre
Nov 22 '18 at 16:27
Ah.. the infamous Murtag! Indeed you are powerful. Internet points for you!!!
– dre
Nov 22 '18 at 16:27
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53432942%2fspock-approximate-comparisions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You may want to use Hamcrest matchers.
– Jeff Scott Brown
Nov 22 '18 at 15:49