summarise(n=n()) returns “Evaluation error: This function should not be called directly.” even when plyr...





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







1















I remove plyr, load dplyr and check the current packages



detach("package:plyr", unload=TRUE)

library(dplyr)

(.packages())



[1] "dplyr" "bindrcpp" "stats" "graphics" "grDevices"
"utils" "datasets"

[8] "methods" "base"




For info here are the conflicts:



conflicts()



[1] "filter" "lag" "body<-" "intersect" "kronecker"
"setdiff" "setequal"

[8] "union"




Then I use summarise and get the error. This is the same code that I used 6 months ago without issue.



by_vs_am <- group_by(mtcars, vs, am)

by_vs <- summarise(by_vs_am, n = n())



Error in summarise_impl(.data, dots) : Evaluation error: This
function should not be called directly.







r







share|improve this question























  • use it in this fasion: dplyr::summarise(by_vs_am, n = n())

    – Andre Elrico
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:15











  • learn more? -> google: "masking function r"

    – Andre Elrico
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:15






  • 3





    Your code works in a clean R session.

    – Rui Barradas
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:23











  • @AndreElrico dplyr::summarise gives me the same error the OP is getting.

    – Rui Barradas
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:28













  • I did test it now. For me it works.

    – Andre Elrico
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:33


















1















I remove plyr, load dplyr and check the current packages



detach("package:plyr", unload=TRUE)

library(dplyr)

(.packages())



[1] "dplyr" "bindrcpp" "stats" "graphics" "grDevices"
"utils" "datasets"

[8] "methods" "base"




For info here are the conflicts:



conflicts()



[1] "filter" "lag" "body<-" "intersect" "kronecker"
"setdiff" "setequal"

[8] "union"




Then I use summarise and get the error. This is the same code that I used 6 months ago without issue.



by_vs_am <- group_by(mtcars, vs, am)

by_vs <- summarise(by_vs_am, n = n())



Error in summarise_impl(.data, dots) : Evaluation error: This
function should not be called directly.







r







share|improve this question























  • use it in this fasion: dplyr::summarise(by_vs_am, n = n())

    – Andre Elrico
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:15











  • learn more? -> google: "masking function r"

    – Andre Elrico
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:15






  • 3





    Your code works in a clean R session.

    – Rui Barradas
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:23











  • @AndreElrico dplyr::summarise gives me the same error the OP is getting.

    – Rui Barradas
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:28













  • I did test it now. For me it works.

    – Andre Elrico
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:33














1












1








1








I remove plyr, load dplyr and check the current packages



detach("package:plyr", unload=TRUE)

library(dplyr)

(.packages())



[1] "dplyr" "bindrcpp" "stats" "graphics" "grDevices"
"utils" "datasets"

[8] "methods" "base"




For info here are the conflicts:



conflicts()



[1] "filter" "lag" "body<-" "intersect" "kronecker"
"setdiff" "setequal"

[8] "union"




Then I use summarise and get the error. This is the same code that I used 6 months ago without issue.



by_vs_am <- group_by(mtcars, vs, am)

by_vs <- summarise(by_vs_am, n = n())



Error in summarise_impl(.data, dots) : Evaluation error: This
function should not be called directly.







r







share|improve this question














I remove plyr, load dplyr and check the current packages



detach("package:plyr", unload=TRUE)

library(dplyr)

(.packages())



[1] "dplyr" "bindrcpp" "stats" "graphics" "grDevices"
"utils" "datasets"

[8] "methods" "base"




For info here are the conflicts:



conflicts()



[1] "filter" "lag" "body<-" "intersect" "kronecker"
"setdiff" "setequal"

[8] "union"




Then I use summarise and get the error. This is the same code that I used 6 months ago without issue.



by_vs_am <- group_by(mtcars, vs, am)

by_vs <- summarise(by_vs_am, n = n())



Error in summarise_impl(.data, dots) : Evaluation error: This
function should not be called directly.







r




r






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 22 '18 at 10:13









user7440188user7440188

256




256













  • use it in this fasion: dplyr::summarise(by_vs_am, n = n())

    – Andre Elrico
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:15











  • learn more? -> google: "masking function r"

    – Andre Elrico
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:15






  • 3





    Your code works in a clean R session.

    – Rui Barradas
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:23











  • @AndreElrico dplyr::summarise gives me the same error the OP is getting.

    – Rui Barradas
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:28













  • I did test it now. For me it works.

    – Andre Elrico
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:33



















  • use it in this fasion: dplyr::summarise(by_vs_am, n = n())

    – Andre Elrico
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:15











  • learn more? -> google: "masking function r"

    – Andre Elrico
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:15






  • 3





    Your code works in a clean R session.

    – Rui Barradas
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:23











  • @AndreElrico dplyr::summarise gives me the same error the OP is getting.

    – Rui Barradas
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:28













  • I did test it now. For me it works.

    – Andre Elrico
    Nov 22 '18 at 10:33

















use it in this fasion: dplyr::summarise(by_vs_am, n = n())

– Andre Elrico
Nov 22 '18 at 10:15





use it in this fasion: dplyr::summarise(by_vs_am, n = n())

– Andre Elrico
Nov 22 '18 at 10:15













learn more? -> google: "masking function r"

– Andre Elrico
Nov 22 '18 at 10:15





learn more? -> google: "masking function r"

– Andre Elrico
Nov 22 '18 at 10:15




3




3





Your code works in a clean R session.

– Rui Barradas
Nov 22 '18 at 10:23





Your code works in a clean R session.

– Rui Barradas
Nov 22 '18 at 10:23













@AndreElrico dplyr::summarise gives me the same error the OP is getting.

– Rui Barradas
Nov 22 '18 at 10:28







@AndreElrico dplyr::summarise gives me the same error the OP is getting.

– Rui Barradas
Nov 22 '18 at 10:28















I did test it now. For me it works.

– Andre Elrico
Nov 22 '18 at 10:33





I did test it now. For me it works.

– Andre Elrico
Nov 22 '18 at 10:33












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Try use dplyr::n() instead.
The code should look like this:



by_vs_am <- group_by(mtcars, vs, am)

by_vs <- summarise(by_vs_am, n = dplyr::n())





share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53428564%2fsummarisen-n-returns-evaluation-error-this-function-should-not-be-called-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    Try use dplyr::n() instead.
    The code should look like this:



    by_vs_am <- group_by(mtcars, vs, am)
    
by_vs <- summarise(by_vs_am, n = dplyr::n())





    share|improve this answer




























      0














      Try use dplyr::n() instead.
      The code should look like this:



      by_vs_am <- group_by(mtcars, vs, am)
      
by_vs <- summarise(by_vs_am, n = dplyr::n())





      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        Try use dplyr::n() instead.
        The code should look like this:



        by_vs_am <- group_by(mtcars, vs, am)
        
by_vs <- summarise(by_vs_am, n = dplyr::n())





        share|improve this answer













        Try use dplyr::n() instead.
        The code should look like this:



        by_vs_am <- group_by(mtcars, vs, am)
        
by_vs <- summarise(by_vs_am, n = dplyr::n())






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jan 22 at 7:06









        Ruining DongRuining Dong

        1




        1
































            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53428564%2fsummarisen-n-returns-evaluation-error-this-function-should-not-be-called-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Guess what letter conforming each word

            Image
            6 $begingroup$ This is an entry in the Fortnightly Topic Challenge #41: Short and Sweet. 1 letter only could be mean anything . With an additional letter in front , could be used as medicine component and something you definitely learn or at least heard once. Add another letter in front , you would possibly hear that many times . Add an additional letter in front , you would found an independent country . With an additional letter, in the end , you would found something related to apple . Add another letter in the end , you would found something bad . Hint: Each letter is unique . word knowledge letters chemistry share | improve this question ...
            Read more

            Port of Spain

            Image
            For ports in the country of Spain, see List of ports in Spain. City in City of Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago Port of Spain City City of Port of Spain Top to bottom (left to right): Skyline of Port of Spain from Gulf of Paria; National Academy for the Performing Arts, Independence Square, Eric Williams Plaza; MovieTowne, Port of Port of Spain Motto(s):  "We Gather Strength As We Go Along" Port of Spain Coordinates: 10°40′N 61°31′W  /  10.667°N 61.517°W  / 10.667; -61.517 Coordinates: 10°40′N 61°31′W  /  10.667°N 61.517°W  / 10.667; -61.517 Country   Trinidad and Tobago Jurisdiction City of Port of Spain Settled 1560 Incorporated (town) 1853 Incorporated (city) 1914 Government  • Mayor Joel Martinez  • Governing body City Corporation Area [1]  • City 12 km 2 (5 sq mi) Elevation [2] 66 m (217 ft) Population (2011) [1]  • City 37,074  • Rank 3rd  • Density 3,090/km 2 (8,000/sq mi)...
            Read more

            Run scheduled task as local user group (not BUILTIN)

            Image
            0 I am trying to run a scheduled task with User Group (not a single user). This is working fine when I in the field "when running a task, use the following user account:" insert BUILTIN User Group (for example: Administrators or Users). But when I try it with the created Local User Group (example: TestGroup) it is not working. The Users in the TestGroup are the same as in the Administrators group. What could be the problem? Are there some restrictions to the Created User Group compared to BUILTINUsers? scheduled-tasks taskscheduler windowstaskschedule share | improve this question asked Nov 15 '18 at 15:36 Far...
            Read more