Can a Pact of the Blade warlock with Improved Pact Weapon use a reach weapon as a spellcasting focus to...
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
The warlock's (Pact of the Blade-only) Improved Pact Weapon eldritch invocation (Xanathar's Guide to Everything, p. 57) states that you can use your pact weapon as a spellcasting focus. Using a whip, let's say, would give your weapon a reach of 10 feet.
Using a reach weapon as a spellcasting focus, can you deliver a touch spell through it to a creature 10 feet away from you?
dnd-5e spells class-feature weapons warlock
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
The warlock's (Pact of the Blade-only) Improved Pact Weapon eldritch invocation (Xanathar's Guide to Everything, p. 57) states that you can use your pact weapon as a spellcasting focus. Using a whip, let's say, would give your weapon a reach of 10 feet.
Using a reach weapon as a spellcasting focus, can you deliver a touch spell through it to a creature 10 feet away from you?
dnd-5e spells class-feature weapons warlock
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already. Clarification: It's the Improved Pact Weapon eldritch invocation that lets you use your weapon as a spellcasting focus, not the Pact of the Blade feature.
– V2Blast
Nov 10 at 7:09
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
The warlock's (Pact of the Blade-only) Improved Pact Weapon eldritch invocation (Xanathar's Guide to Everything, p. 57) states that you can use your pact weapon as a spellcasting focus. Using a whip, let's say, would give your weapon a reach of 10 feet.
Using a reach weapon as a spellcasting focus, can you deliver a touch spell through it to a creature 10 feet away from you?
dnd-5e spells class-feature weapons warlock
The warlock's (Pact of the Blade-only) Improved Pact Weapon eldritch invocation (Xanathar's Guide to Everything, p. 57) states that you can use your pact weapon as a spellcasting focus. Using a whip, let's say, would give your weapon a reach of 10 feet.
Using a reach weapon as a spellcasting focus, can you deliver a touch spell through it to a creature 10 feet away from you?
dnd-5e spells class-feature weapons warlock
dnd-5e spells class-feature weapons warlock
edited Nov 10 at 7:13
V2Blast
18.2k248114
18.2k248114
asked Nov 10 at 6:28
L. H.
232
232
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already. Clarification: It's the Improved Pact Weapon eldritch invocation that lets you use your weapon as a spellcasting focus, not the Pact of the Blade feature.
– V2Blast
Nov 10 at 7:09
add a comment |
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already. Clarification: It's the Improved Pact Weapon eldritch invocation that lets you use your weapon as a spellcasting focus, not the Pact of the Blade feature.
– V2Blast
Nov 10 at 7:09
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already. Clarification: It's the Improved Pact Weapon eldritch invocation that lets you use your weapon as a spellcasting focus, not the Pact of the Blade feature.
– V2Blast
Nov 10 at 7:09
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already. Clarification: It's the Improved Pact Weapon eldritch invocation that lets you use your weapon as a spellcasting focus, not the Pact of the Blade feature.
– V2Blast
Nov 10 at 7:09
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
No, a focus does not deliver spells
Page 202 of the Player's Handbook states (emphasis mine):
Material (M)
Casting some spells requires particular objects, specified in parentheses in the component entry. A character can use a component pouch or a spellcasting focus (found in chapter 5) in place of the components specified for a spell. But if a cost is indicated for a component, a character must have that specific component before he or she can cast the spell.
If a spell states that a material component is consumed by the spell, the caster must provide this component for each casting of the spell. A spellcaster must have a hand free to access these components - or to hold a spellcasting focus - but it can be the same hand that he or she uses to perform somatic components.
Normally you would need one empty hand to hold your focus and do somatic components of the spell. Thus, could not hold a weapon and shield while casting. In effect, the Pact of the Blade feature removes this restriction by making your weapon a focus.
@V2Blast -- the PHB does not contain the words "or to hold a spellcasting focus" though I agree that it is implied.
– ravery
Nov 10 at 7:10
The most recent versions, in fact, do. That's why the basic rules say the same thing. See the errata: media.wizards.com/2017/dnd/downloads/PH-Errata.pdf
– V2Blast
Nov 10 at 7:11
1
@V2Blast - thanks for the link to the errata
– ravery
Nov 10 at 7:16
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
No.
Using something as a spell focus means you no longer need to provide costless material components when casting a spell (Player's Handbook, p. 203, section on material components). There is no provision for delivering touch attacks through your spell focus, so unless a specific rule (e.g., an item or spell) says otherwise, you cannot do that.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
RAW says no (or tenuously unclear)
Touch spells have no special rules apart from this bit in Player's Handbook, page 202, under Range:
Some spells can target only a creature (including you) that you touch.
Lacking a proper definition, to touch a target means the same as in natural English: you need to have body contact.
I am aware that it's also idiomatic to "touch someone with something", however, this is not a very natural reading of the rules to me and would empower any caster to acquire a long, thin pole to poke their spell targets with.
Whichever reading you prefer, the fact that the weapon is one's focus doesn't have any impact on using it to deliver touch spells.
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
No, a focus does not deliver spells
Page 202 of the Player's Handbook states (emphasis mine):
Material (M)
Casting some spells requires particular objects, specified in parentheses in the component entry. A character can use a component pouch or a spellcasting focus (found in chapter 5) in place of the components specified for a spell. But if a cost is indicated for a component, a character must have that specific component before he or she can cast the spell.
If a spell states that a material component is consumed by the spell, the caster must provide this component for each casting of the spell. A spellcaster must have a hand free to access these components - or to hold a spellcasting focus - but it can be the same hand that he or she uses to perform somatic components.
Normally you would need one empty hand to hold your focus and do somatic components of the spell. Thus, could not hold a weapon and shield while casting. In effect, the Pact of the Blade feature removes this restriction by making your weapon a focus.
@V2Blast -- the PHB does not contain the words "or to hold a spellcasting focus" though I agree that it is implied.
– ravery
Nov 10 at 7:10
The most recent versions, in fact, do. That's why the basic rules say the same thing. See the errata: media.wizards.com/2017/dnd/downloads/PH-Errata.pdf
– V2Blast
Nov 10 at 7:11
1
@V2Blast - thanks for the link to the errata
– ravery
Nov 10 at 7:16
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
No, a focus does not deliver spells
Page 202 of the Player's Handbook states (emphasis mine):
Material (M)
Casting some spells requires particular objects, specified in parentheses in the component entry. A character can use a component pouch or a spellcasting focus (found in chapter 5) in place of the components specified for a spell. But if a cost is indicated for a component, a character must have that specific component before he or she can cast the spell.
If a spell states that a material component is consumed by the spell, the caster must provide this component for each casting of the spell. A spellcaster must have a hand free to access these components - or to hold a spellcasting focus - but it can be the same hand that he or she uses to perform somatic components.
Normally you would need one empty hand to hold your focus and do somatic components of the spell. Thus, could not hold a weapon and shield while casting. In effect, the Pact of the Blade feature removes this restriction by making your weapon a focus.
@V2Blast -- the PHB does not contain the words "or to hold a spellcasting focus" though I agree that it is implied.
– ravery
Nov 10 at 7:10
The most recent versions, in fact, do. That's why the basic rules say the same thing. See the errata: media.wizards.com/2017/dnd/downloads/PH-Errata.pdf
– V2Blast
Nov 10 at 7:11
1
@V2Blast - thanks for the link to the errata
– ravery
Nov 10 at 7:16
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
No, a focus does not deliver spells
Page 202 of the Player's Handbook states (emphasis mine):
Material (M)
Casting some spells requires particular objects, specified in parentheses in the component entry. A character can use a component pouch or a spellcasting focus (found in chapter 5) in place of the components specified for a spell. But if a cost is indicated for a component, a character must have that specific component before he or she can cast the spell.
If a spell states that a material component is consumed by the spell, the caster must provide this component for each casting of the spell. A spellcaster must have a hand free to access these components - or to hold a spellcasting focus - but it can be the same hand that he or she uses to perform somatic components.
Normally you would need one empty hand to hold your focus and do somatic components of the spell. Thus, could not hold a weapon and shield while casting. In effect, the Pact of the Blade feature removes this restriction by making your weapon a focus.
No, a focus does not deliver spells
Page 202 of the Player's Handbook states (emphasis mine):
Material (M)
Casting some spells requires particular objects, specified in parentheses in the component entry. A character can use a component pouch or a spellcasting focus (found in chapter 5) in place of the components specified for a spell. But if a cost is indicated for a component, a character must have that specific component before he or she can cast the spell.
If a spell states that a material component is consumed by the spell, the caster must provide this component for each casting of the spell. A spellcaster must have a hand free to access these components - or to hold a spellcasting focus - but it can be the same hand that he or she uses to perform somatic components.
Normally you would need one empty hand to hold your focus and do somatic components of the spell. Thus, could not hold a weapon and shield while casting. In effect, the Pact of the Blade feature removes this restriction by making your weapon a focus.
edited Nov 10 at 7:06
V2Blast
18.2k248114
18.2k248114
answered Nov 10 at 6:50
ravery
7,79711556
7,79711556
@V2Blast -- the PHB does not contain the words "or to hold a spellcasting focus" though I agree that it is implied.
– ravery
Nov 10 at 7:10
The most recent versions, in fact, do. That's why the basic rules say the same thing. See the errata: media.wizards.com/2017/dnd/downloads/PH-Errata.pdf
– V2Blast
Nov 10 at 7:11
1
@V2Blast - thanks for the link to the errata
– ravery
Nov 10 at 7:16
add a comment |
@V2Blast -- the PHB does not contain the words "or to hold a spellcasting focus" though I agree that it is implied.
– ravery
Nov 10 at 7:10
The most recent versions, in fact, do. That's why the basic rules say the same thing. See the errata: media.wizards.com/2017/dnd/downloads/PH-Errata.pdf
– V2Blast
Nov 10 at 7:11
1
@V2Blast - thanks for the link to the errata
– ravery
Nov 10 at 7:16
@V2Blast -- the PHB does not contain the words "or to hold a spellcasting focus" though I agree that it is implied.
– ravery
Nov 10 at 7:10
@V2Blast -- the PHB does not contain the words "or to hold a spellcasting focus" though I agree that it is implied.
– ravery
Nov 10 at 7:10
The most recent versions, in fact, do. That's why the basic rules say the same thing. See the errata: media.wizards.com/2017/dnd/downloads/PH-Errata.pdf
– V2Blast
Nov 10 at 7:11
The most recent versions, in fact, do. That's why the basic rules say the same thing. See the errata: media.wizards.com/2017/dnd/downloads/PH-Errata.pdf
– V2Blast
Nov 10 at 7:11
1
1
@V2Blast - thanks for the link to the errata
– ravery
Nov 10 at 7:16
@V2Blast - thanks for the link to the errata
– ravery
Nov 10 at 7:16
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
No.
Using something as a spell focus means you no longer need to provide costless material components when casting a spell (Player's Handbook, p. 203, section on material components). There is no provision for delivering touch attacks through your spell focus, so unless a specific rule (e.g., an item or spell) says otherwise, you cannot do that.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
No.
Using something as a spell focus means you no longer need to provide costless material components when casting a spell (Player's Handbook, p. 203, section on material components). There is no provision for delivering touch attacks through your spell focus, so unless a specific rule (e.g., an item or spell) says otherwise, you cannot do that.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
No.
Using something as a spell focus means you no longer need to provide costless material components when casting a spell (Player's Handbook, p. 203, section on material components). There is no provision for delivering touch attacks through your spell focus, so unless a specific rule (e.g., an item or spell) says otherwise, you cannot do that.
No.
Using something as a spell focus means you no longer need to provide costless material components when casting a spell (Player's Handbook, p. 203, section on material components). There is no provision for delivering touch attacks through your spell focus, so unless a specific rule (e.g., an item or spell) says otherwise, you cannot do that.
edited Nov 10 at 6:43
answered Nov 10 at 6:37
Zhuge
2,68721324
2,68721324
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
RAW says no (or tenuously unclear)
Touch spells have no special rules apart from this bit in Player's Handbook, page 202, under Range:
Some spells can target only a creature (including you) that you touch.
Lacking a proper definition, to touch a target means the same as in natural English: you need to have body contact.
I am aware that it's also idiomatic to "touch someone with something", however, this is not a very natural reading of the rules to me and would empower any caster to acquire a long, thin pole to poke their spell targets with.
Whichever reading you prefer, the fact that the weapon is one's focus doesn't have any impact on using it to deliver touch spells.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
RAW says no (or tenuously unclear)
Touch spells have no special rules apart from this bit in Player's Handbook, page 202, under Range:
Some spells can target only a creature (including you) that you touch.
Lacking a proper definition, to touch a target means the same as in natural English: you need to have body contact.
I am aware that it's also idiomatic to "touch someone with something", however, this is not a very natural reading of the rules to me and would empower any caster to acquire a long, thin pole to poke their spell targets with.
Whichever reading you prefer, the fact that the weapon is one's focus doesn't have any impact on using it to deliver touch spells.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
RAW says no (or tenuously unclear)
Touch spells have no special rules apart from this bit in Player's Handbook, page 202, under Range:
Some spells can target only a creature (including you) that you touch.
Lacking a proper definition, to touch a target means the same as in natural English: you need to have body contact.
I am aware that it's also idiomatic to "touch someone with something", however, this is not a very natural reading of the rules to me and would empower any caster to acquire a long, thin pole to poke their spell targets with.
Whichever reading you prefer, the fact that the weapon is one's focus doesn't have any impact on using it to deliver touch spells.
RAW says no (or tenuously unclear)
Touch spells have no special rules apart from this bit in Player's Handbook, page 202, under Range:
Some spells can target only a creature (including you) that you touch.
Lacking a proper definition, to touch a target means the same as in natural English: you need to have body contact.
I am aware that it's also idiomatic to "touch someone with something", however, this is not a very natural reading of the rules to me and would empower any caster to acquire a long, thin pole to poke their spell targets with.
Whichever reading you prefer, the fact that the weapon is one's focus doesn't have any impact on using it to deliver touch spells.
answered Nov 10 at 6:56
kviiri
31.5k7118186
31.5k7118186
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135268%2fcan-a-pact-of-the-blade-warlock-with-improved-pact-weapon-use-a-reach-weapon-as%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already. Clarification: It's the Improved Pact Weapon eldritch invocation that lets you use your weapon as a spellcasting focus, not the Pact of the Blade feature.
– V2Blast
Nov 10 at 7:09