Can I mix 2 versions of electron in one project?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Very new to electron I am wondering if I can use 1.4.16 for certain windows and 3.0.8 for the main app.
Here's why:
I need the transparent window feature for some windows of my app under Linux. This is working until V1.4.16. I'd like to use 3.x for the rest, since it's a bit cumbersome to always have to search for old docs.
electron
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Very new to electron I am wondering if I can use 1.4.16 for certain windows and 3.0.8 for the main app.
Here's why:
I need the transparent window feature for some windows of my app under Linux. This is working until V1.4.16. I'd like to use 3.x for the rest, since it's a bit cumbersome to always have to search for old docs.
electron
As far as I know, it's not a supported or typical scenario. But there are options to achieve your goal if you don't mind doing some "plumbing". You could build your transparent window as a separate Electron application, and use sockets or web sockets, pipes, or any normal form of IPC to communicate between the transparent window and your main application. Locking yourself to an earlier version of Electron is not great though for lots of reasons and maybe rather investigate options for somehow achieving transparency in 3.x. Wish I could help with that but my main experience is on Windows OS.
– GrahamMc
Nov 13 at 20:26
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Very new to electron I am wondering if I can use 1.4.16 for certain windows and 3.0.8 for the main app.
Here's why:
I need the transparent window feature for some windows of my app under Linux. This is working until V1.4.16. I'd like to use 3.x for the rest, since it's a bit cumbersome to always have to search for old docs.
electron
Very new to electron I am wondering if I can use 1.4.16 for certain windows and 3.0.8 for the main app.
Here's why:
I need the transparent window feature for some windows of my app under Linux. This is working until V1.4.16. I'd like to use 3.x for the rest, since it's a bit cumbersome to always have to search for old docs.
electron
electron
edited Nov 10 at 14:39
asked Nov 10 at 14:33
m_square
34
34
As far as I know, it's not a supported or typical scenario. But there are options to achieve your goal if you don't mind doing some "plumbing". You could build your transparent window as a separate Electron application, and use sockets or web sockets, pipes, or any normal form of IPC to communicate between the transparent window and your main application. Locking yourself to an earlier version of Electron is not great though for lots of reasons and maybe rather investigate options for somehow achieving transparency in 3.x. Wish I could help with that but my main experience is on Windows OS.
– GrahamMc
Nov 13 at 20:26
add a comment |
As far as I know, it's not a supported or typical scenario. But there are options to achieve your goal if you don't mind doing some "plumbing". You could build your transparent window as a separate Electron application, and use sockets or web sockets, pipes, or any normal form of IPC to communicate between the transparent window and your main application. Locking yourself to an earlier version of Electron is not great though for lots of reasons and maybe rather investigate options for somehow achieving transparency in 3.x. Wish I could help with that but my main experience is on Windows OS.
– GrahamMc
Nov 13 at 20:26
As far as I know, it's not a supported or typical scenario. But there are options to achieve your goal if you don't mind doing some "plumbing". You could build your transparent window as a separate Electron application, and use sockets or web sockets, pipes, or any normal form of IPC to communicate between the transparent window and your main application. Locking yourself to an earlier version of Electron is not great though for lots of reasons and maybe rather investigate options for somehow achieving transparency in 3.x. Wish I could help with that but my main experience is on Windows OS.
– GrahamMc
Nov 13 at 20:26
As far as I know, it's not a supported or typical scenario. But there are options to achieve your goal if you don't mind doing some "plumbing". You could build your transparent window as a separate Electron application, and use sockets or web sockets, pipes, or any normal form of IPC to communicate between the transparent window and your main application. Locking yourself to an earlier version of Electron is not great though for lots of reasons and maybe rather investigate options for somehow achieving transparency in 3.x. Wish I could help with that but my main experience is on Windows OS.
– GrahamMc
Nov 13 at 20:26
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53239971%2fcan-i-mix-2-versions-of-electron-in-one-project%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
As far as I know, it's not a supported or typical scenario. But there are options to achieve your goal if you don't mind doing some "plumbing". You could build your transparent window as a separate Electron application, and use sockets or web sockets, pipes, or any normal form of IPC to communicate between the transparent window and your main application. Locking yourself to an earlier version of Electron is not great though for lots of reasons and maybe rather investigate options for somehow achieving transparency in 3.x. Wish I could help with that but my main experience is on Windows OS.
– GrahamMc
Nov 13 at 20:26