Design suggestions on Permission handling












0















We have a rather complicated system for permissions at hour company for ASP.NET Core system we are running. So there are multiple applications and user's permission needs to carry over from one application to another so we are not creating a different permission table for each application for the user.



I found this from 8 years ago but since many new improvements made in this field, I wanted to bring it up to the table again.
Patterns / design suggestions for permission handling



How is the best way to handle permissions through multiple apps that proves to have the least amount of extra data and efficient?










share|improve this question























  • too broad with too little information

    – Steve
    Nov 8 '18 at 15:48













  • What other information needed?

    – Peace
    Nov 8 '18 at 15:50











  • what kind of permission? how are the permission relate to each other? are permissions for different app completely isolated from each other? whats the problem of storing all of them in one table? how many kinds of permissions do you anticipate? things like those

    – Steve
    Nov 8 '18 at 15:54











  • List of permission from ability to view, edit, add, delete to perform certain actions.Yes each app has its own isolated functions. There are so many attributes that needs to be allowed or not for each user. The problem is also, if we create a template and say each time we create a user we select a template to apply permissions, then at some point later we want to modify every xyz type of users we cant...

    – Peace
    Nov 8 '18 at 15:57











  • can you give some concrete example? still not convinced that group based policy wouldnt do the job

    – Steve
    Nov 8 '18 at 16:00


















0















We have a rather complicated system for permissions at hour company for ASP.NET Core system we are running. So there are multiple applications and user's permission needs to carry over from one application to another so we are not creating a different permission table for each application for the user.



I found this from 8 years ago but since many new improvements made in this field, I wanted to bring it up to the table again.
Patterns / design suggestions for permission handling



How is the best way to handle permissions through multiple apps that proves to have the least amount of extra data and efficient?










share|improve this question























  • too broad with too little information

    – Steve
    Nov 8 '18 at 15:48













  • What other information needed?

    – Peace
    Nov 8 '18 at 15:50











  • what kind of permission? how are the permission relate to each other? are permissions for different app completely isolated from each other? whats the problem of storing all of them in one table? how many kinds of permissions do you anticipate? things like those

    – Steve
    Nov 8 '18 at 15:54











  • List of permission from ability to view, edit, add, delete to perform certain actions.Yes each app has its own isolated functions. There are so many attributes that needs to be allowed or not for each user. The problem is also, if we create a template and say each time we create a user we select a template to apply permissions, then at some point later we want to modify every xyz type of users we cant...

    – Peace
    Nov 8 '18 at 15:57











  • can you give some concrete example? still not convinced that group based policy wouldnt do the job

    – Steve
    Nov 8 '18 at 16:00
















0












0








0


2






We have a rather complicated system for permissions at hour company for ASP.NET Core system we are running. So there are multiple applications and user's permission needs to carry over from one application to another so we are not creating a different permission table for each application for the user.



I found this from 8 years ago but since many new improvements made in this field, I wanted to bring it up to the table again.
Patterns / design suggestions for permission handling



How is the best way to handle permissions through multiple apps that proves to have the least amount of extra data and efficient?










share|improve this question














We have a rather complicated system for permissions at hour company for ASP.NET Core system we are running. So there are multiple applications and user's permission needs to carry over from one application to another so we are not creating a different permission table for each application for the user.



I found this from 8 years ago but since many new improvements made in this field, I wanted to bring it up to the table again.
Patterns / design suggestions for permission handling



How is the best way to handle permissions through multiple apps that proves to have the least amount of extra data and efficient?







c# database design-patterns asp.net-core permissions






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 8 '18 at 15:46









PeacePeace

567




567













  • too broad with too little information

    – Steve
    Nov 8 '18 at 15:48













  • What other information needed?

    – Peace
    Nov 8 '18 at 15:50











  • what kind of permission? how are the permission relate to each other? are permissions for different app completely isolated from each other? whats the problem of storing all of them in one table? how many kinds of permissions do you anticipate? things like those

    – Steve
    Nov 8 '18 at 15:54











  • List of permission from ability to view, edit, add, delete to perform certain actions.Yes each app has its own isolated functions. There are so many attributes that needs to be allowed or not for each user. The problem is also, if we create a template and say each time we create a user we select a template to apply permissions, then at some point later we want to modify every xyz type of users we cant...

    – Peace
    Nov 8 '18 at 15:57











  • can you give some concrete example? still not convinced that group based policy wouldnt do the job

    – Steve
    Nov 8 '18 at 16:00





















  • too broad with too little information

    – Steve
    Nov 8 '18 at 15:48













  • What other information needed?

    – Peace
    Nov 8 '18 at 15:50











  • what kind of permission? how are the permission relate to each other? are permissions for different app completely isolated from each other? whats the problem of storing all of them in one table? how many kinds of permissions do you anticipate? things like those

    – Steve
    Nov 8 '18 at 15:54











  • List of permission from ability to view, edit, add, delete to perform certain actions.Yes each app has its own isolated functions. There are so many attributes that needs to be allowed or not for each user. The problem is also, if we create a template and say each time we create a user we select a template to apply permissions, then at some point later we want to modify every xyz type of users we cant...

    – Peace
    Nov 8 '18 at 15:57











  • can you give some concrete example? still not convinced that group based policy wouldnt do the job

    – Steve
    Nov 8 '18 at 16:00



















too broad with too little information

– Steve
Nov 8 '18 at 15:48







too broad with too little information

– Steve
Nov 8 '18 at 15:48















What other information needed?

– Peace
Nov 8 '18 at 15:50





What other information needed?

– Peace
Nov 8 '18 at 15:50













what kind of permission? how are the permission relate to each other? are permissions for different app completely isolated from each other? whats the problem of storing all of them in one table? how many kinds of permissions do you anticipate? things like those

– Steve
Nov 8 '18 at 15:54





what kind of permission? how are the permission relate to each other? are permissions for different app completely isolated from each other? whats the problem of storing all of them in one table? how many kinds of permissions do you anticipate? things like those

– Steve
Nov 8 '18 at 15:54













List of permission from ability to view, edit, add, delete to perform certain actions.Yes each app has its own isolated functions. There are so many attributes that needs to be allowed or not for each user. The problem is also, if we create a template and say each time we create a user we select a template to apply permissions, then at some point later we want to modify every xyz type of users we cant...

– Peace
Nov 8 '18 at 15:57





List of permission from ability to view, edit, add, delete to perform certain actions.Yes each app has its own isolated functions. There are so many attributes that needs to be allowed or not for each user. The problem is also, if we create a template and say each time we create a user we select a template to apply permissions, then at some point later we want to modify every xyz type of users we cant...

– Peace
Nov 8 '18 at 15:57













can you give some concrete example? still not convinced that group based policy wouldnt do the job

– Steve
Nov 8 '18 at 16:00







can you give some concrete example? still not convinced that group based policy wouldnt do the job

– Steve
Nov 8 '18 at 16:00














0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53211281%2fdesign-suggestions-on-permission-handling%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53211281%2fdesign-suggestions-on-permission-handling%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

鏡平學校

ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?