Getting the top n values by group not working as expected
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
Consider the following head(10) of a dataframe:
It is generated by this dplyr code:
Fuller_list %>%
as.data.frame() %>%
select(from_infomap, topic) %>%
add_count(from_infomap) %>%
filter(from_infomap %in% coms_keep) %>%
group_by(from_infomap) %>%
add_count(topic) %>%
top_n(10, nn) %>%
head(10)
There are 36 different communities in the "from_infomap" column and 47 different topics in the "topic" column. Grouped by "from_infomap" the number of topics per community, for the first 5 communities, look like this:
I would like to show the top 10 most occurring topics per community, ordered descending. I tried to do that here with:
group_by(from_infomap) %>%
add_count(topic) %>%
top_n(10, nn)
But if I plot that, it only returns the top 1 topic per community:
I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. According to this stack overflow query, the weighted top_n(n,wt) function on the count should work, it should give the top 10 topics weighted by their count, grouped by community.
If anyone could perhaps suggest an alternative or point out where I'm going wrong, it would be greatly appreciated. Apologies for the small screenshots, I can't show the entire data.frame here, as it is quite large.
Thanks!
Edit: dput without the group_by, add_count and top_n:
n <- Fuller_list %>%
as.data.frame() %>%
select(from_infomap, topic) %>%
add_count(from_infomap) %>%
filter(from_infomap %in% coms_keep) %>%
group_by(from_infomap)
dput(head(n,10)):
structure(list(from_infomap = c(1L, 1L, 1L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L,
4L, 4L), topic = c("KnysnaFire_thanks_wofire", "Abramjee_caperelief_operationsa",
"Pick_n_Pay", "Plett_heavy_rain_snow", "Disasters_help_call",
"KFM_disasters_discussion", "Pick_n_Pay", "Pick_n_Pay", "Pick_n_Pay",
"Pick_n_Pay"), n = c(30512L, 30512L, 30512L, 6572L, 6572L, 6572L,
5030L, 5030L, 5030L, 5030L)), row.names = c(NA, -10L), class = c("grouped_df",
"tbl_df", "tbl", "data.frame"), vars = "from_infomap", drop = TRUE, indices = list(
0:2, 3:5, 6:9), group_sizes = c(3L, 3L, 4L), biggest_group_size = 4L, labels = structure(list(
from_infomap = c(1L, 3L, 4L)), row.names = c(NA, -3L), class = "data.frame", vars = "from_infomap", drop = TRUE))
Issue should be reproducible by adding this code to the previous chunk:
add_count(topic) %>%
top_n(10,nn) %>%
ungroup() %>%
ggplot(aes(x = fct_reorder(topic,nn),y = nn,fill = from_infomap))+
geom_col(width = 1)+
facet_wrap(~from_infomap, scales = "free")+
coord_flip()+
theme(plot.title = element_text("Central Players"),
plot.subtitle= element_text("Top 10 indegree centrality profiles of the 20 biggest communities.n Excluding 'starburst' communities."),
plot.caption = element_text("Source: Twitter"))+
theme_few()
Halway-Solution: So with the summarise method suggested by @s_t, we have the following code:
Fuller_list %>%
as.data.frame() %>%
add_count(from_infomap) %>%
filter(from_infomap %in% coms_keep) %>%
group_by(from_infomap,topic) %>% # group by the topic and community
summarise(nn = n()) %>% # count the mentioned arguments
top_n(10, nn) %>%
ungroup() %>%
arrange(from_infomap, nn) %>%
ggplot(aes(x = fct_reorder(topic,nn),y = nn,fill = from_infomap))+
geom_col(width = 1)+
facet_wrap(~from_infomap, scales = "free")+
coord_flip()+
theme(plot.title = element_text("Central Players"),
plot.subtitle= element_text("Top 10 indegree centrality profiles of the 20 biggest communities.n Excluding 'starburst' communities."),
plot.caption = element_text("Source: Twitter"))+
theme_few()
And this produces:
Which is the correct top_n(10) of the various communities. For all practical purposes, the plot now shows the correct data. The only remaining issue is that the arrange does not sort the various topics in desc order per community, but rather overall. Minor issue, would only improve aes if the topics could be arranged per community.
r dataframe dplyr
|
show 4 more comments
Consider the following head(10) of a dataframe:
It is generated by this dplyr code:
Fuller_list %>%
as.data.frame() %>%
select(from_infomap, topic) %>%
add_count(from_infomap) %>%
filter(from_infomap %in% coms_keep) %>%
group_by(from_infomap) %>%
add_count(topic) %>%
top_n(10, nn) %>%
head(10)
There are 36 different communities in the "from_infomap" column and 47 different topics in the "topic" column. Grouped by "from_infomap" the number of topics per community, for the first 5 communities, look like this:
I would like to show the top 10 most occurring topics per community, ordered descending. I tried to do that here with:
group_by(from_infomap) %>%
add_count(topic) %>%
top_n(10, nn)
But if I plot that, it only returns the top 1 topic per community:
I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. According to this stack overflow query, the weighted top_n(n,wt) function on the count should work, it should give the top 10 topics weighted by their count, grouped by community.
If anyone could perhaps suggest an alternative or point out where I'm going wrong, it would be greatly appreciated. Apologies for the small screenshots, I can't show the entire data.frame here, as it is quite large.
Thanks!
Edit: dput without the group_by, add_count and top_n:
n <- Fuller_list %>%
as.data.frame() %>%
select(from_infomap, topic) %>%
add_count(from_infomap) %>%
filter(from_infomap %in% coms_keep) %>%
group_by(from_infomap)
dput(head(n,10)):
structure(list(from_infomap = c(1L, 1L, 1L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L,
4L, 4L), topic = c("KnysnaFire_thanks_wofire", "Abramjee_caperelief_operationsa",
"Pick_n_Pay", "Plett_heavy_rain_snow", "Disasters_help_call",
"KFM_disasters_discussion", "Pick_n_Pay", "Pick_n_Pay", "Pick_n_Pay",
"Pick_n_Pay"), n = c(30512L, 30512L, 30512L, 6572L, 6572L, 6572L,
5030L, 5030L, 5030L, 5030L)), row.names = c(NA, -10L), class = c("grouped_df",
"tbl_df", "tbl", "data.frame"), vars = "from_infomap", drop = TRUE, indices = list(
0:2, 3:5, 6:9), group_sizes = c(3L, 3L, 4L), biggest_group_size = 4L, labels = structure(list(
from_infomap = c(1L, 3L, 4L)), row.names = c(NA, -3L), class = "data.frame", vars = "from_infomap", drop = TRUE))
Issue should be reproducible by adding this code to the previous chunk:
add_count(topic) %>%
top_n(10,nn) %>%
ungroup() %>%
ggplot(aes(x = fct_reorder(topic,nn),y = nn,fill = from_infomap))+
geom_col(width = 1)+
facet_wrap(~from_infomap, scales = "free")+
coord_flip()+
theme(plot.title = element_text("Central Players"),
plot.subtitle= element_text("Top 10 indegree centrality profiles of the 20 biggest communities.n Excluding 'starburst' communities."),
plot.caption = element_text("Source: Twitter"))+
theme_few()
Halway-Solution: So with the summarise method suggested by @s_t, we have the following code:
Fuller_list %>%
as.data.frame() %>%
add_count(from_infomap) %>%
filter(from_infomap %in% coms_keep) %>%
group_by(from_infomap,topic) %>% # group by the topic and community
summarise(nn = n()) %>% # count the mentioned arguments
top_n(10, nn) %>%
ungroup() %>%
arrange(from_infomap, nn) %>%
ggplot(aes(x = fct_reorder(topic,nn),y = nn,fill = from_infomap))+
geom_col(width = 1)+
facet_wrap(~from_infomap, scales = "free")+
coord_flip()+
theme(plot.title = element_text("Central Players"),
plot.subtitle= element_text("Top 10 indegree centrality profiles of the 20 biggest communities.n Excluding 'starburst' communities."),
plot.caption = element_text("Source: Twitter"))+
theme_few()
And this produces:
Which is the correct top_n(10) of the various communities. For all practical purposes, the plot now shows the correct data. The only remaining issue is that the arrange does not sort the various topics in desc order per community, but rather overall. Minor issue, would only improve aes if the topics could be arranged per community.
r dataframe dplyr
Could you post some usable data (not an image)?
– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 7:58
Here are some tips on how: stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/…
– sindri_baldur
Nov 22 '18 at 7:58
@s_t I've added a link to a downloadable sample of the code. I hope this is what you were looking for? drive.google.com/file/d/128R9Vgjd2QsFwHf0M5Yi8ltli2dsDsrJ/…
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 8:11
@snoram, I would like to use dput to give a sample of the code, but the dataset is quite large (many variables), it won't be practically viewable here. I've provided a link to a 1000 line sample, I hope this is in order?
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 8:14
2
@s_t Of course, I've added the output from dput(head()) below. Is that what you were looking for? Apologies, I'm not very experienced at this yet.
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 8:21
|
show 4 more comments
Consider the following head(10) of a dataframe:
It is generated by this dplyr code:
Fuller_list %>%
as.data.frame() %>%
select(from_infomap, topic) %>%
add_count(from_infomap) %>%
filter(from_infomap %in% coms_keep) %>%
group_by(from_infomap) %>%
add_count(topic) %>%
top_n(10, nn) %>%
head(10)
There are 36 different communities in the "from_infomap" column and 47 different topics in the "topic" column. Grouped by "from_infomap" the number of topics per community, for the first 5 communities, look like this:
I would like to show the top 10 most occurring topics per community, ordered descending. I tried to do that here with:
group_by(from_infomap) %>%
add_count(topic) %>%
top_n(10, nn)
But if I plot that, it only returns the top 1 topic per community:
I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. According to this stack overflow query, the weighted top_n(n,wt) function on the count should work, it should give the top 10 topics weighted by their count, grouped by community.
If anyone could perhaps suggest an alternative or point out where I'm going wrong, it would be greatly appreciated. Apologies for the small screenshots, I can't show the entire data.frame here, as it is quite large.
Thanks!
Edit: dput without the group_by, add_count and top_n:
n <- Fuller_list %>%
as.data.frame() %>%
select(from_infomap, topic) %>%
add_count(from_infomap) %>%
filter(from_infomap %in% coms_keep) %>%
group_by(from_infomap)
dput(head(n,10)):
structure(list(from_infomap = c(1L, 1L, 1L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L,
4L, 4L), topic = c("KnysnaFire_thanks_wofire", "Abramjee_caperelief_operationsa",
"Pick_n_Pay", "Plett_heavy_rain_snow", "Disasters_help_call",
"KFM_disasters_discussion", "Pick_n_Pay", "Pick_n_Pay", "Pick_n_Pay",
"Pick_n_Pay"), n = c(30512L, 30512L, 30512L, 6572L, 6572L, 6572L,
5030L, 5030L, 5030L, 5030L)), row.names = c(NA, -10L), class = c("grouped_df",
"tbl_df", "tbl", "data.frame"), vars = "from_infomap", drop = TRUE, indices = list(
0:2, 3:5, 6:9), group_sizes = c(3L, 3L, 4L), biggest_group_size = 4L, labels = structure(list(
from_infomap = c(1L, 3L, 4L)), row.names = c(NA, -3L), class = "data.frame", vars = "from_infomap", drop = TRUE))
Issue should be reproducible by adding this code to the previous chunk:
add_count(topic) %>%
top_n(10,nn) %>%
ungroup() %>%
ggplot(aes(x = fct_reorder(topic,nn),y = nn,fill = from_infomap))+
geom_col(width = 1)+
facet_wrap(~from_infomap, scales = "free")+
coord_flip()+
theme(plot.title = element_text("Central Players"),
plot.subtitle= element_text("Top 10 indegree centrality profiles of the 20 biggest communities.n Excluding 'starburst' communities."),
plot.caption = element_text("Source: Twitter"))+
theme_few()
Halway-Solution: So with the summarise method suggested by @s_t, we have the following code:
Fuller_list %>%
as.data.frame() %>%
add_count(from_infomap) %>%
filter(from_infomap %in% coms_keep) %>%
group_by(from_infomap,topic) %>% # group by the topic and community
summarise(nn = n()) %>% # count the mentioned arguments
top_n(10, nn) %>%
ungroup() %>%
arrange(from_infomap, nn) %>%
ggplot(aes(x = fct_reorder(topic,nn),y = nn,fill = from_infomap))+
geom_col(width = 1)+
facet_wrap(~from_infomap, scales = "free")+
coord_flip()+
theme(plot.title = element_text("Central Players"),
plot.subtitle= element_text("Top 10 indegree centrality profiles of the 20 biggest communities.n Excluding 'starburst' communities."),
plot.caption = element_text("Source: Twitter"))+
theme_few()
And this produces:
Which is the correct top_n(10) of the various communities. For all practical purposes, the plot now shows the correct data. The only remaining issue is that the arrange does not sort the various topics in desc order per community, but rather overall. Minor issue, would only improve aes if the topics could be arranged per community.
r dataframe dplyr
Consider the following head(10) of a dataframe:
It is generated by this dplyr code:
Fuller_list %>%
as.data.frame() %>%
select(from_infomap, topic) %>%
add_count(from_infomap) %>%
filter(from_infomap %in% coms_keep) %>%
group_by(from_infomap) %>%
add_count(topic) %>%
top_n(10, nn) %>%
head(10)
There are 36 different communities in the "from_infomap" column and 47 different topics in the "topic" column. Grouped by "from_infomap" the number of topics per community, for the first 5 communities, look like this:
I would like to show the top 10 most occurring topics per community, ordered descending. I tried to do that here with:
group_by(from_infomap) %>%
add_count(topic) %>%
top_n(10, nn)
But if I plot that, it only returns the top 1 topic per community:
I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. According to this stack overflow query, the weighted top_n(n,wt) function on the count should work, it should give the top 10 topics weighted by their count, grouped by community.
If anyone could perhaps suggest an alternative or point out where I'm going wrong, it would be greatly appreciated. Apologies for the small screenshots, I can't show the entire data.frame here, as it is quite large.
Thanks!
Edit: dput without the group_by, add_count and top_n:
n <- Fuller_list %>%
as.data.frame() %>%
select(from_infomap, topic) %>%
add_count(from_infomap) %>%
filter(from_infomap %in% coms_keep) %>%
group_by(from_infomap)
dput(head(n,10)):
structure(list(from_infomap = c(1L, 1L, 1L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L,
4L, 4L), topic = c("KnysnaFire_thanks_wofire", "Abramjee_caperelief_operationsa",
"Pick_n_Pay", "Plett_heavy_rain_snow", "Disasters_help_call",
"KFM_disasters_discussion", "Pick_n_Pay", "Pick_n_Pay", "Pick_n_Pay",
"Pick_n_Pay"), n = c(30512L, 30512L, 30512L, 6572L, 6572L, 6572L,
5030L, 5030L, 5030L, 5030L)), row.names = c(NA, -10L), class = c("grouped_df",
"tbl_df", "tbl", "data.frame"), vars = "from_infomap", drop = TRUE, indices = list(
0:2, 3:5, 6:9), group_sizes = c(3L, 3L, 4L), biggest_group_size = 4L, labels = structure(list(
from_infomap = c(1L, 3L, 4L)), row.names = c(NA, -3L), class = "data.frame", vars = "from_infomap", drop = TRUE))
Issue should be reproducible by adding this code to the previous chunk:
add_count(topic) %>%
top_n(10,nn) %>%
ungroup() %>%
ggplot(aes(x = fct_reorder(topic,nn),y = nn,fill = from_infomap))+
geom_col(width = 1)+
facet_wrap(~from_infomap, scales = "free")+
coord_flip()+
theme(plot.title = element_text("Central Players"),
plot.subtitle= element_text("Top 10 indegree centrality profiles of the 20 biggest communities.n Excluding 'starburst' communities."),
plot.caption = element_text("Source: Twitter"))+
theme_few()
Halway-Solution: So with the summarise method suggested by @s_t, we have the following code:
Fuller_list %>%
as.data.frame() %>%
add_count(from_infomap) %>%
filter(from_infomap %in% coms_keep) %>%
group_by(from_infomap,topic) %>% # group by the topic and community
summarise(nn = n()) %>% # count the mentioned arguments
top_n(10, nn) %>%
ungroup() %>%
arrange(from_infomap, nn) %>%
ggplot(aes(x = fct_reorder(topic,nn),y = nn,fill = from_infomap))+
geom_col(width = 1)+
facet_wrap(~from_infomap, scales = "free")+
coord_flip()+
theme(plot.title = element_text("Central Players"),
plot.subtitle= element_text("Top 10 indegree centrality profiles of the 20 biggest communities.n Excluding 'starburst' communities."),
plot.caption = element_text("Source: Twitter"))+
theme_few()
And this produces:
Which is the correct top_n(10) of the various communities. For all practical purposes, the plot now shows the correct data. The only remaining issue is that the arrange does not sort the various topics in desc order per community, but rather overall. Minor issue, would only improve aes if the topics could be arranged per community.
r dataframe dplyr
r dataframe dplyr
edited Nov 22 '18 at 11:06
Petrus
asked Nov 22 '18 at 7:51
PetrusPetrus
286
286
Could you post some usable data (not an image)?
– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 7:58
Here are some tips on how: stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/…
– sindri_baldur
Nov 22 '18 at 7:58
@s_t I've added a link to a downloadable sample of the code. I hope this is what you were looking for? drive.google.com/file/d/128R9Vgjd2QsFwHf0M5Yi8ltli2dsDsrJ/…
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 8:11
@snoram, I would like to use dput to give a sample of the code, but the dataset is quite large (many variables), it won't be practically viewable here. I've provided a link to a 1000 line sample, I hope this is in order?
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 8:14
2
@s_t Of course, I've added the output from dput(head()) below. Is that what you were looking for? Apologies, I'm not very experienced at this yet.
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 8:21
|
show 4 more comments
Could you post some usable data (not an image)?
– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 7:58
Here are some tips on how: stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/…
– sindri_baldur
Nov 22 '18 at 7:58
@s_t I've added a link to a downloadable sample of the code. I hope this is what you were looking for? drive.google.com/file/d/128R9Vgjd2QsFwHf0M5Yi8ltli2dsDsrJ/…
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 8:11
@snoram, I would like to use dput to give a sample of the code, but the dataset is quite large (many variables), it won't be practically viewable here. I've provided a link to a 1000 line sample, I hope this is in order?
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 8:14
2
@s_t Of course, I've added the output from dput(head()) below. Is that what you were looking for? Apologies, I'm not very experienced at this yet.
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 8:21
Could you post some usable data (not an image)?
– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 7:58
Could you post some usable data (not an image)?
– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 7:58
Here are some tips on how: stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/…
– sindri_baldur
Nov 22 '18 at 7:58
Here are some tips on how: stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/…
– sindri_baldur
Nov 22 '18 at 7:58
@s_t I've added a link to a downloadable sample of the code. I hope this is what you were looking for? drive.google.com/file/d/128R9Vgjd2QsFwHf0M5Yi8ltli2dsDsrJ/…
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 8:11
@s_t I've added a link to a downloadable sample of the code. I hope this is what you were looking for? drive.google.com/file/d/128R9Vgjd2QsFwHf0M5Yi8ltli2dsDsrJ/…
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 8:11
@snoram, I would like to use dput to give a sample of the code, but the dataset is quite large (many variables), it won't be practically viewable here. I've provided a link to a 1000 line sample, I hope this is in order?
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 8:14
@snoram, I would like to use dput to give a sample of the code, but the dataset is quite large (many variables), it won't be practically viewable here. I've provided a link to a 1000 line sample, I hope this is in order?
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 8:14
2
2
@s_t Of course, I've added the output from dput(head()) below. Is that what you were looking for? Apologies, I'm not very experienced at this yet.
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 8:21
@s_t Of course, I've added the output from dput(head()) below. Is that what you were looking for? Apologies, I'm not very experienced at this yet.
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 8:21
|
show 4 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Maybe this can help, if I've understood well, you would like to count the topics in each community, select the top(X), and plot them in a decreasing way in each facet:
library(ggplot2)
library(dplyr)
data3 <-
data2 %>%
select(-n) %>% # remove useless column
group_by(from_infomap,topic) %>% # group by the topic and community
summarise(nn = n()) %>% # count the mentioned arguments
top_n(5, nn) # take the top 5 in this case
Now we handle the order, as stated here:
data4 <- data3 %>%
ungroup() %>%
arrange(from_infomap, nn) %>%
mutate(topic_r = row_number())
Lastly the plot:
ggplot(data4, aes(topic_r, nn,fill = from_infomap)) +
geom_col() +
facet_wrap(~ from_infomap, scales = "free") +
scale_x_continuous(
breaks = d$topic_r,
labels = d$topic
) +
coord_flip()
I have used some fake data, like these:
data2 <- data.frame(from_infomap =floor(runif(200, 1,5)) ,
topic = sample(letters[1:20], 200, TRUE),
n = floor(runif(200, 10,50)) )
So many topics in communities have the same number, so you do not see only 5 columns.
This is definitely a move in the right direction, I'm getting multiple topics per community now. I'm just getting a plot for every row though, but I'm going to work with this and get back to you with a solution. Thank you so much for your effort!
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 10:19
If you remove the useless part in your question ad update it with this answer, we can try to solve everything if there are other issues.
– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 10:32
I've added a "Halfway-Solution" to the question with your code added. Only remaining issue is the arrange that is applied overall, rather than per community. However, I'm more than happy to have the correct representation of data on the plot already. Thank you very much!
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 11:05
Looking at your new code, you have forgot the some steps of mydata4
, likemutate(...)
that adds the variable to use in the plot, and thescale_x_continuous(...)
part in the plot, to order the bars.
– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 11:30
I tried to add the mutate() for topic_r and then the scale_x_continuous to the plot, but got the error: Discrete value supplied to continuous scale. I tried several solutions, such as scale_x_discrete, or coercing topic_r into a numeric value as suggested by a different stackoverflow question, but didn't succeed.
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 11:49
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53426147%2fgetting-the-top-n-values-by-group-not-working-as-expected%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Maybe this can help, if I've understood well, you would like to count the topics in each community, select the top(X), and plot them in a decreasing way in each facet:
library(ggplot2)
library(dplyr)
data3 <-
data2 %>%
select(-n) %>% # remove useless column
group_by(from_infomap,topic) %>% # group by the topic and community
summarise(nn = n()) %>% # count the mentioned arguments
top_n(5, nn) # take the top 5 in this case
Now we handle the order, as stated here:
data4 <- data3 %>%
ungroup() %>%
arrange(from_infomap, nn) %>%
mutate(topic_r = row_number())
Lastly the plot:
ggplot(data4, aes(topic_r, nn,fill = from_infomap)) +
geom_col() +
facet_wrap(~ from_infomap, scales = "free") +
scale_x_continuous(
breaks = d$topic_r,
labels = d$topic
) +
coord_flip()
I have used some fake data, like these:
data2 <- data.frame(from_infomap =floor(runif(200, 1,5)) ,
topic = sample(letters[1:20], 200, TRUE),
n = floor(runif(200, 10,50)) )
So many topics in communities have the same number, so you do not see only 5 columns.
This is definitely a move in the right direction, I'm getting multiple topics per community now. I'm just getting a plot for every row though, but I'm going to work with this and get back to you with a solution. Thank you so much for your effort!
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 10:19
If you remove the useless part in your question ad update it with this answer, we can try to solve everything if there are other issues.
– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 10:32
I've added a "Halfway-Solution" to the question with your code added. Only remaining issue is the arrange that is applied overall, rather than per community. However, I'm more than happy to have the correct representation of data on the plot already. Thank you very much!
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 11:05
Looking at your new code, you have forgot the some steps of mydata4
, likemutate(...)
that adds the variable to use in the plot, and thescale_x_continuous(...)
part in the plot, to order the bars.
– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 11:30
I tried to add the mutate() for topic_r and then the scale_x_continuous to the plot, but got the error: Discrete value supplied to continuous scale. I tried several solutions, such as scale_x_discrete, or coercing topic_r into a numeric value as suggested by a different stackoverflow question, but didn't succeed.
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 11:49
|
show 1 more comment
Maybe this can help, if I've understood well, you would like to count the topics in each community, select the top(X), and plot them in a decreasing way in each facet:
library(ggplot2)
library(dplyr)
data3 <-
data2 %>%
select(-n) %>% # remove useless column
group_by(from_infomap,topic) %>% # group by the topic and community
summarise(nn = n()) %>% # count the mentioned arguments
top_n(5, nn) # take the top 5 in this case
Now we handle the order, as stated here:
data4 <- data3 %>%
ungroup() %>%
arrange(from_infomap, nn) %>%
mutate(topic_r = row_number())
Lastly the plot:
ggplot(data4, aes(topic_r, nn,fill = from_infomap)) +
geom_col() +
facet_wrap(~ from_infomap, scales = "free") +
scale_x_continuous(
breaks = d$topic_r,
labels = d$topic
) +
coord_flip()
I have used some fake data, like these:
data2 <- data.frame(from_infomap =floor(runif(200, 1,5)) ,
topic = sample(letters[1:20], 200, TRUE),
n = floor(runif(200, 10,50)) )
So many topics in communities have the same number, so you do not see only 5 columns.
This is definitely a move in the right direction, I'm getting multiple topics per community now. I'm just getting a plot for every row though, but I'm going to work with this and get back to you with a solution. Thank you so much for your effort!
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 10:19
If you remove the useless part in your question ad update it with this answer, we can try to solve everything if there are other issues.
– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 10:32
I've added a "Halfway-Solution" to the question with your code added. Only remaining issue is the arrange that is applied overall, rather than per community. However, I'm more than happy to have the correct representation of data on the plot already. Thank you very much!
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 11:05
Looking at your new code, you have forgot the some steps of mydata4
, likemutate(...)
that adds the variable to use in the plot, and thescale_x_continuous(...)
part in the plot, to order the bars.
– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 11:30
I tried to add the mutate() for topic_r and then the scale_x_continuous to the plot, but got the error: Discrete value supplied to continuous scale. I tried several solutions, such as scale_x_discrete, or coercing topic_r into a numeric value as suggested by a different stackoverflow question, but didn't succeed.
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 11:49
|
show 1 more comment
Maybe this can help, if I've understood well, you would like to count the topics in each community, select the top(X), and plot them in a decreasing way in each facet:
library(ggplot2)
library(dplyr)
data3 <-
data2 %>%
select(-n) %>% # remove useless column
group_by(from_infomap,topic) %>% # group by the topic and community
summarise(nn = n()) %>% # count the mentioned arguments
top_n(5, nn) # take the top 5 in this case
Now we handle the order, as stated here:
data4 <- data3 %>%
ungroup() %>%
arrange(from_infomap, nn) %>%
mutate(topic_r = row_number())
Lastly the plot:
ggplot(data4, aes(topic_r, nn,fill = from_infomap)) +
geom_col() +
facet_wrap(~ from_infomap, scales = "free") +
scale_x_continuous(
breaks = d$topic_r,
labels = d$topic
) +
coord_flip()
I have used some fake data, like these:
data2 <- data.frame(from_infomap =floor(runif(200, 1,5)) ,
topic = sample(letters[1:20], 200, TRUE),
n = floor(runif(200, 10,50)) )
So many topics in communities have the same number, so you do not see only 5 columns.
Maybe this can help, if I've understood well, you would like to count the topics in each community, select the top(X), and plot them in a decreasing way in each facet:
library(ggplot2)
library(dplyr)
data3 <-
data2 %>%
select(-n) %>% # remove useless column
group_by(from_infomap,topic) %>% # group by the topic and community
summarise(nn = n()) %>% # count the mentioned arguments
top_n(5, nn) # take the top 5 in this case
Now we handle the order, as stated here:
data4 <- data3 %>%
ungroup() %>%
arrange(from_infomap, nn) %>%
mutate(topic_r = row_number())
Lastly the plot:
ggplot(data4, aes(topic_r, nn,fill = from_infomap)) +
geom_col() +
facet_wrap(~ from_infomap, scales = "free") +
scale_x_continuous(
breaks = d$topic_r,
labels = d$topic
) +
coord_flip()
I have used some fake data, like these:
data2 <- data.frame(from_infomap =floor(runif(200, 1,5)) ,
topic = sample(letters[1:20], 200, TRUE),
n = floor(runif(200, 10,50)) )
So many topics in communities have the same number, so you do not see only 5 columns.
answered Nov 22 '18 at 10:00
s_ts_t
3,69121133
3,69121133
This is definitely a move in the right direction, I'm getting multiple topics per community now. I'm just getting a plot for every row though, but I'm going to work with this and get back to you with a solution. Thank you so much for your effort!
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 10:19
If you remove the useless part in your question ad update it with this answer, we can try to solve everything if there are other issues.
– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 10:32
I've added a "Halfway-Solution" to the question with your code added. Only remaining issue is the arrange that is applied overall, rather than per community. However, I'm more than happy to have the correct representation of data on the plot already. Thank you very much!
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 11:05
Looking at your new code, you have forgot the some steps of mydata4
, likemutate(...)
that adds the variable to use in the plot, and thescale_x_continuous(...)
part in the plot, to order the bars.
– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 11:30
I tried to add the mutate() for topic_r and then the scale_x_continuous to the plot, but got the error: Discrete value supplied to continuous scale. I tried several solutions, such as scale_x_discrete, or coercing topic_r into a numeric value as suggested by a different stackoverflow question, but didn't succeed.
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 11:49
|
show 1 more comment
This is definitely a move in the right direction, I'm getting multiple topics per community now. I'm just getting a plot for every row though, but I'm going to work with this and get back to you with a solution. Thank you so much for your effort!
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 10:19
If you remove the useless part in your question ad update it with this answer, we can try to solve everything if there are other issues.
– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 10:32
I've added a "Halfway-Solution" to the question with your code added. Only remaining issue is the arrange that is applied overall, rather than per community. However, I'm more than happy to have the correct representation of data on the plot already. Thank you very much!
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 11:05
Looking at your new code, you have forgot the some steps of mydata4
, likemutate(...)
that adds the variable to use in the plot, and thescale_x_continuous(...)
part in the plot, to order the bars.
– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 11:30
I tried to add the mutate() for topic_r and then the scale_x_continuous to the plot, but got the error: Discrete value supplied to continuous scale. I tried several solutions, such as scale_x_discrete, or coercing topic_r into a numeric value as suggested by a different stackoverflow question, but didn't succeed.
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 11:49
This is definitely a move in the right direction, I'm getting multiple topics per community now. I'm just getting a plot for every row though, but I'm going to work with this and get back to you with a solution. Thank you so much for your effort!
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 10:19
This is definitely a move in the right direction, I'm getting multiple topics per community now. I'm just getting a plot for every row though, but I'm going to work with this and get back to you with a solution. Thank you so much for your effort!
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 10:19
If you remove the useless part in your question ad update it with this answer, we can try to solve everything if there are other issues.
– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 10:32
If you remove the useless part in your question ad update it with this answer, we can try to solve everything if there are other issues.
– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 10:32
I've added a "Halfway-Solution" to the question with your code added. Only remaining issue is the arrange that is applied overall, rather than per community. However, I'm more than happy to have the correct representation of data on the plot already. Thank you very much!
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 11:05
I've added a "Halfway-Solution" to the question with your code added. Only remaining issue is the arrange that is applied overall, rather than per community. However, I'm more than happy to have the correct representation of data on the plot already. Thank you very much!
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 11:05
Looking at your new code, you have forgot the some steps of my
data4
, like mutate(...)
that adds the variable to use in the plot, and the scale_x_continuous(...)
part in the plot, to order the bars.– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 11:30
Looking at your new code, you have forgot the some steps of my
data4
, like mutate(...)
that adds the variable to use in the plot, and the scale_x_continuous(...)
part in the plot, to order the bars.– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 11:30
I tried to add the mutate() for topic_r and then the scale_x_continuous to the plot, but got the error: Discrete value supplied to continuous scale. I tried several solutions, such as scale_x_discrete, or coercing topic_r into a numeric value as suggested by a different stackoverflow question, but didn't succeed.
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 11:49
I tried to add the mutate() for topic_r and then the scale_x_continuous to the plot, but got the error: Discrete value supplied to continuous scale. I tried several solutions, such as scale_x_discrete, or coercing topic_r into a numeric value as suggested by a different stackoverflow question, but didn't succeed.
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 11:49
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53426147%2fgetting-the-top-n-values-by-group-not-working-as-expected%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Could you post some usable data (not an image)?
– s_t
Nov 22 '18 at 7:58
Here are some tips on how: stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/…
– sindri_baldur
Nov 22 '18 at 7:58
@s_t I've added a link to a downloadable sample of the code. I hope this is what you were looking for? drive.google.com/file/d/128R9Vgjd2QsFwHf0M5Yi8ltli2dsDsrJ/…
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 8:11
@snoram, I would like to use dput to give a sample of the code, but the dataset is quite large (many variables), it won't be practically viewable here. I've provided a link to a 1000 line sample, I hope this is in order?
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 8:14
2
@s_t Of course, I've added the output from dput(head()) below. Is that what you were looking for? Apologies, I'm not very experienced at this yet.
– Petrus
Nov 22 '18 at 8:21