How to get REPL to recognize tests within a map?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I have a map defined as follows:
"Arcane Golem"
{:name "Arcane Golem"
:attack 4
:health 4
:mana-cost 3
:type :minion
:set :classic
:rarity :rare
:description "Battlecry: Give your opponent a Mana
Crystal."
:battlecry (fn battlecry [state minion]
{:test (fn
(as-> (create-game [{:minions [(create-minion "Arcane Golem" :id "ag")]}]) $
(battlecry $ (get-minion $ "ag"))
(contains? (get-in $[:players "p1" :hand]) "Mana Crystal")))}
(-> (get-opponent state (:id minion))
(:id)
(add-card-to-hand state (create-card "Mana Crystal"))))}
This map is itself a key-value pair in a larger map of maps called card-definitions. As you can see, I've written a test for battlecry function below; however, when I start REPL and run all tests in this maps' namespace, it says Ran 0 tests with 0 assertions.
How can I get REPL to recognize this test?
clojure read-eval-print-loop
add a comment |
I have a map defined as follows:
"Arcane Golem"
{:name "Arcane Golem"
:attack 4
:health 4
:mana-cost 3
:type :minion
:set :classic
:rarity :rare
:description "Battlecry: Give your opponent a Mana
Crystal."
:battlecry (fn battlecry [state minion]
{:test (fn
(as-> (create-game [{:minions [(create-minion "Arcane Golem" :id "ag")]}]) $
(battlecry $ (get-minion $ "ag"))
(contains? (get-in $[:players "p1" :hand]) "Mana Crystal")))}
(-> (get-opponent state (:id minion))
(:id)
(add-card-to-hand state (create-card "Mana Crystal"))))}
This map is itself a key-value pair in a larger map of maps called card-definitions. As you can see, I've written a test for battlecry function below; however, when I start REPL and run all tests in this maps' namespace, it says Ran 0 tests with 0 assertions.
How can I get REPL to recognize this test?
clojure read-eval-print-loop
add a comment |
I have a map defined as follows:
"Arcane Golem"
{:name "Arcane Golem"
:attack 4
:health 4
:mana-cost 3
:type :minion
:set :classic
:rarity :rare
:description "Battlecry: Give your opponent a Mana
Crystal."
:battlecry (fn battlecry [state minion]
{:test (fn
(as-> (create-game [{:minions [(create-minion "Arcane Golem" :id "ag")]}]) $
(battlecry $ (get-minion $ "ag"))
(contains? (get-in $[:players "p1" :hand]) "Mana Crystal")))}
(-> (get-opponent state (:id minion))
(:id)
(add-card-to-hand state (create-card "Mana Crystal"))))}
This map is itself a key-value pair in a larger map of maps called card-definitions. As you can see, I've written a test for battlecry function below; however, when I start REPL and run all tests in this maps' namespace, it says Ran 0 tests with 0 assertions.
How can I get REPL to recognize this test?
clojure read-eval-print-loop
I have a map defined as follows:
"Arcane Golem"
{:name "Arcane Golem"
:attack 4
:health 4
:mana-cost 3
:type :minion
:set :classic
:rarity :rare
:description "Battlecry: Give your opponent a Mana
Crystal."
:battlecry (fn battlecry [state minion]
{:test (fn
(as-> (create-game [{:minions [(create-minion "Arcane Golem" :id "ag")]}]) $
(battlecry $ (get-minion $ "ag"))
(contains? (get-in $[:players "p1" :hand]) "Mana Crystal")))}
(-> (get-opponent state (:id minion))
(:id)
(add-card-to-hand state (create-card "Mana Crystal"))))}
This map is itself a key-value pair in a larger map of maps called card-definitions. As you can see, I've written a test for battlecry function below; however, when I start REPL and run all tests in this maps' namespace, it says Ran 0 tests with 0 assertions.
How can I get REPL to recognize this test?
clojure read-eval-print-loop
clojure read-eval-print-loop
asked Nov 21 '18 at 23:06
lmotl3lmotl3
15212
15212
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You can use with-test
to define a function and a unit test at the same time
; with-test is the same as using {:test #((is...)(is...))} in the meta data of the function.
(:use 'clojure.test)
(with-test
(defn my-function [x y]
(+ x y))
(is (= 4 (my-function 2 2)))
(is (= 7 (my-function 3 4))))
(test #'my-function) ;(test (var my-function))
=> :ok
NOTE: When using with-test
, the function must still be defined as a global var using defn
(see example). An anonymous fn
as the value of a map key will not be found by the testing machinery.
What should work is to define the function as standalone var, and then include a reference to it in the map:
{:battlecry my-function} ; for example
Having said that, most people (myself included) prefer to have a separate testing namespace to keep the tests from cluttering the source code. I like to organize them as:
flintstones.core ; main namespace
tst.flintstones.core ; the unit test namespace
These are then placed in ./src
and ./test
subdirs of the project dir:
src/flintstones/core.clj ; main namespace
test/tst/flintstones/core.clj ; the unit tests
But there are other possiblities. See also the Clojure Cookbook discussion on testing.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53421697%2fhow-to-get-repl-to-recognize-tests-within-a-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can use with-test
to define a function and a unit test at the same time
; with-test is the same as using {:test #((is...)(is...))} in the meta data of the function.
(:use 'clojure.test)
(with-test
(defn my-function [x y]
(+ x y))
(is (= 4 (my-function 2 2)))
(is (= 7 (my-function 3 4))))
(test #'my-function) ;(test (var my-function))
=> :ok
NOTE: When using with-test
, the function must still be defined as a global var using defn
(see example). An anonymous fn
as the value of a map key will not be found by the testing machinery.
What should work is to define the function as standalone var, and then include a reference to it in the map:
{:battlecry my-function} ; for example
Having said that, most people (myself included) prefer to have a separate testing namespace to keep the tests from cluttering the source code. I like to organize them as:
flintstones.core ; main namespace
tst.flintstones.core ; the unit test namespace
These are then placed in ./src
and ./test
subdirs of the project dir:
src/flintstones/core.clj ; main namespace
test/tst/flintstones/core.clj ; the unit tests
But there are other possiblities. See also the Clojure Cookbook discussion on testing.
add a comment |
You can use with-test
to define a function and a unit test at the same time
; with-test is the same as using {:test #((is...)(is...))} in the meta data of the function.
(:use 'clojure.test)
(with-test
(defn my-function [x y]
(+ x y))
(is (= 4 (my-function 2 2)))
(is (= 7 (my-function 3 4))))
(test #'my-function) ;(test (var my-function))
=> :ok
NOTE: When using with-test
, the function must still be defined as a global var using defn
(see example). An anonymous fn
as the value of a map key will not be found by the testing machinery.
What should work is to define the function as standalone var, and then include a reference to it in the map:
{:battlecry my-function} ; for example
Having said that, most people (myself included) prefer to have a separate testing namespace to keep the tests from cluttering the source code. I like to organize them as:
flintstones.core ; main namespace
tst.flintstones.core ; the unit test namespace
These are then placed in ./src
and ./test
subdirs of the project dir:
src/flintstones/core.clj ; main namespace
test/tst/flintstones/core.clj ; the unit tests
But there are other possiblities. See also the Clojure Cookbook discussion on testing.
add a comment |
You can use with-test
to define a function and a unit test at the same time
; with-test is the same as using {:test #((is...)(is...))} in the meta data of the function.
(:use 'clojure.test)
(with-test
(defn my-function [x y]
(+ x y))
(is (= 4 (my-function 2 2)))
(is (= 7 (my-function 3 4))))
(test #'my-function) ;(test (var my-function))
=> :ok
NOTE: When using with-test
, the function must still be defined as a global var using defn
(see example). An anonymous fn
as the value of a map key will not be found by the testing machinery.
What should work is to define the function as standalone var, and then include a reference to it in the map:
{:battlecry my-function} ; for example
Having said that, most people (myself included) prefer to have a separate testing namespace to keep the tests from cluttering the source code. I like to organize them as:
flintstones.core ; main namespace
tst.flintstones.core ; the unit test namespace
These are then placed in ./src
and ./test
subdirs of the project dir:
src/flintstones/core.clj ; main namespace
test/tst/flintstones/core.clj ; the unit tests
But there are other possiblities. See also the Clojure Cookbook discussion on testing.
You can use with-test
to define a function and a unit test at the same time
; with-test is the same as using {:test #((is...)(is...))} in the meta data of the function.
(:use 'clojure.test)
(with-test
(defn my-function [x y]
(+ x y))
(is (= 4 (my-function 2 2)))
(is (= 7 (my-function 3 4))))
(test #'my-function) ;(test (var my-function))
=> :ok
NOTE: When using with-test
, the function must still be defined as a global var using defn
(see example). An anonymous fn
as the value of a map key will not be found by the testing machinery.
What should work is to define the function as standalone var, and then include a reference to it in the map:
{:battlecry my-function} ; for example
Having said that, most people (myself included) prefer to have a separate testing namespace to keep the tests from cluttering the source code. I like to organize them as:
flintstones.core ; main namespace
tst.flintstones.core ; the unit test namespace
These are then placed in ./src
and ./test
subdirs of the project dir:
src/flintstones/core.clj ; main namespace
test/tst/flintstones/core.clj ; the unit tests
But there are other possiblities. See also the Clojure Cookbook discussion on testing.
edited Nov 22 '18 at 19:56
answered Nov 22 '18 at 1:10
Alan ThompsonAlan Thompson
14.4k22534
14.4k22534
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53421697%2fhow-to-get-repl-to-recognize-tests-within-a-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown