Bloch wave







Isosurface of the square modulus of a Bloch wave in silicon lattice




Solid line: A schematic of a typical Bloch wave in one dimension. (The actual wave is complex; this is the real part.) The dotted line is from the eik·r factor. The light circles represent atoms.


A Bloch wave (also called Bloch state or Bloch function or Bloch wavefunction), named after Swiss physicist Felix Bloch, is a type of wavefunction for a particle in a periodically-repeating environment, most commonly an electron in a crystal. A wavefunction ψ is a Bloch wave if it has the form:[1]


ψ(r)=eik⋅ru(r){displaystyle psi (mathbf {r} )=mathrm {e} ^{mathrm {i} mathbf {k} cdot mathbf {r} }u(mathbf {r} )}psi ({mathbf  {r}})={mathrm  {e}}^{{{mathrm  {i}}{mathbf  {k}}cdot {mathbf  {r}}}}u({mathbf  {r}})

where r is position, ψ is the Bloch wave, u is a periodic function with the same periodicity as the crystal, k is a vector of real numbers called the crystal wave vector, e is Euler's number, and i is the imaginary unit. In other words, if we multiply a plane wave by a periodic function, we get a Bloch wave.


Bloch waves are important because of Bloch's theorem, which states that the energy eigenstates for an electron in a crystal can be written as Bloch waves. (More precisely, it states that the electron wave functions in a crystal have a basis consisting entirely of Bloch wave energy eigenstates.) This fact underlies the concept of electronic band structures.


These Bloch wave energy eigenstates are written with subscripts as ψn k, where n is a discrete index, called the band index, which is present because there are many different Bloch waves with the same k (each has a different periodic component u). Within a band (i.e., for fixed n), ψn k varies continuously with k, as does its energy. Also, for any reciprocal lattice vector K, ψn k = ψn,(k+K). Therefore, all distinct Bloch waves occur for k-values within the first Brillouin zone of the reciprocal lattice.




Contents






  • 1 Applications and consequences


    • 1.1 Applicability


    • 1.2 Meaning and non-uniqueness of the parameter k


    • 1.3 Detailed example




  • 2 Proof of Bloch's theorem


    • 2.1 Preliminaries: Crystal symmetries, lattice, and reciprocal lattice


    • 2.2 Lemma about translation operators


    • 2.3 Proof




  • 3 History and related equations


  • 4 See also


  • 5 References


  • 6 Further reading





Applications and consequences



Applicability


The most common example of Bloch's theorem is describing electrons in a crystal. However, a Bloch-wave description applies more generally to any wave-like phenomenon in a periodic medium. For example, a periodic dielectric in electromagnetism leads to photonic crystals, and a periodic acoustic medium leads to phononic crystals. It is generally treated in the various forms of the dynamical theory of diffraction.



Meaning and non-uniqueness of the parameter k




A Bloch wave (bottom) can be broken up into the product of a periodic function (top) and a plane-wave (center). The left side and right side represent the same Bloch wave broken up in two different ways, involving the wave vector k1 (left) or k2 (right). The difference (k1k2) is a reciprocal lattice vector. In all plots, blue is real part and red is imaginary part.


Suppose an electron is in a Bloch state


ψ(r)=eik⋅ru(r),{displaystyle psi (mathbf {r} )=mathrm {e} ^{mathrm {i} mathbf {k} cdot mathbf {r} }u(mathbf {r} ),}psi ({mathbf  {r}})={mathrm  {e}}^{{{mathrm  {i}}{mathbf  {k}}cdot {mathbf  {r}}}}u({mathbf  {r}}),

where u is periodic with the same periodicity as the crystal lattice. The actual quantum state of the electron is entirely determined by ψ, not k or u directly. This is important because k and u are not unique. Specifically, if ψ can be written as above using k, it can also be written using (k + K), where K is any reciprocal lattice vector (see figure at right). Therefore, wave vectors that differ by a reciprocal lattice vector are equivalent, in the sense that they characterize the same set of Bloch states.


The first Brillouin zone is a restricted set of values of k with the property that no two of them are equivalent, yet every possible k is equivalent to one (and only one) vector in the first Brillouin zone. Therefore, if we restrict k to the first Brillouin zone, then every Bloch state has a unique k. Therefore, the first Brillouin zone is often used to depict all of the Bloch states without redundancy, for example in a band structure, and it is used for the same reason in many calculations.


When k is multiplied by the reduced Planck's constant, it equals the electron's crystal momentum. Related to this, the group velocity of an electron can be calculated based on how the energy of a Bloch state varies with k; for more details see crystal momentum.



Detailed example


For a detailed example in which the consequences of Bloch's theorem are worked out in a specific situation, see the article: Particle in a one-dimensional lattice (periodic potential).



Proof of Bloch's theorem


Next, we prove Bloch's theorem:



For electrons in a perfect crystal, there is a basis of wavefunctions with the properties:

  • Each of these wavefunctions is an energy eigenstate

  • Each of these wavefunctions is a Bloch wave, meaning that this wavefunction ψ{displaystyle psi }psi can be written in the form



ψ(r)=eik⋅ru(r){displaystyle psi (mathbf {r} )=mathrm {e} ^{mathrm {i} mathbf {k} cdot mathbf {r} }u(mathbf {r} )}psi ({mathbf  {r}})={mathrm  {e}}^{{{mathrm  {i}}{mathbf  {k}}cdot {mathbf  {r}}}}u({mathbf  {r}})

where u has the same periodicity as the atomic structure of the crystal.




Preliminaries: Crystal symmetries, lattice, and reciprocal lattice


The defining property of a crystal is translational symmetry, which means that if the crystal is shifted an appropriate amount, it winds up with all its atoms in the same places. (A finite-size crystal cannot have perfect translational symmetry, but it is a useful approximation.)


A three-dimensional crystal has three primitive lattice vectors a1, a2, a3. If the crystal is shifted by any of these three vectors, or a combination of them of the form


n1a1+n2a2+n3a3{displaystyle n_{1}mathbf {a} _{1}+n_{2}mathbf {a} _{2}+n_{3}mathbf {a} _{3}}n_{1}{mathbf  {a}}_{1}+n_{2}{mathbf  {a}}_{2}+n_{3}{mathbf  {a}}_{3}

where ni are three integers, then the atoms end up in the same set of locations as they started.


Another helpful ingredient in the proof is the reciprocal lattice vectors. These are three vectors b1, b2, b3 (with units of inverse length), with the property that ai · bi = 2π, but ai · bj = 0 when ij. (For the formula for bi, see reciprocal lattice vector.)



Lemma about translation operators


Let T^n1,n2,n3{displaystyle {hat {T}}_{n_{1},n_{2},n_{3}}!}{hat  {T}}_{{n_{1},n_{2},n_{3}}}! denote a translation operator that shifts every wave function by the amount n1a1 + n2a2 + n3a3 (as above, nj are integers). The following fact is helpful for the proof of Bloch's theorem:


Lemma: If a wavefunction ψ is an eigenstate of all of the translation operators (simultaneously), then ψ is a Bloch wave.

Proof: Assume that we have a wavefunction ψ which is an eigenstate of all the translation operators. As a special case of this,


ψ(r+aj)=Cjψ(r){displaystyle psi (mathbf {r} +mathbf {a} _{j})=C_{j}psi (mathbf {r} )}{displaystyle psi (mathbf {r} +mathbf {a} _{j})=C_{j}psi (mathbf {r} )}

for j = 1, 2, 3, where Cj are three numbers (the eigenvalues) which do not depend on r. It is helpful to write the numbers Cj in a different form, by choosing three numbers θ1, θ2, θ3 with e2πiθj = Cj:


ψ(r+aj)=e2π(r){displaystyle psi (mathbf {r} +mathbf {a} _{j})=mathrm {e} ^{2pi mathrm {i} theta _{j}}psi (mathbf {r} )}{displaystyle psi (mathbf {r} +mathbf {a} _{j})=mathrm {e} ^{2pi mathrm {i} theta _{j}}psi (mathbf {r} )}

Again, the θj are three numbers which do not depend on r. Define k = θ1b1 + θ2b2 + θ3b3, where bj are the reciprocal lattice vectors (see above). Finally, define


u(r)=e−ik⋅(r).{displaystyle u(mathbf {r} )=mathrm {e} ^{-mathrm {i} mathbf {k} cdot mathbf {r} }psi (mathbf {r} ),.}u({mathbf  {r}})={mathrm  {e}}^{{-{mathrm  {i}}{mathbf  {k}}cdot {mathbf  {r}}}}psi ({mathbf  {r}}),.

Then



u(r+aj)=e−ik⋅(r+aj)ψ(r+aj)=(e−ik⋅re−ik⋅aj)(e2π(r))=e−ik⋅re−je2π(r)=u(r){displaystyle u(mathbf {r} +mathbf {a} _{j})=mathrm {e} ^{-mathrm {i} mathbf {k} cdot (mathbf {r} +mathbf {a} _{j})}psi (mathbf {r} +mathbf {a} _{j})={big (}mathrm {e} ^{-mathrm {i} mathbf {k} cdot mathbf {r} }mathrm {e} ^{-mathrm {i} mathbf {k} cdot mathbf {a} _{j}}{big )}{big (}mathrm {e} ^{2pi mathrm {i} theta _{j}}psi (mathbf {r} ){big )}=mathrm {e} ^{-mathrm {i} mathbf {k} cdot mathbf {r} }mathrm {e} ^{-2pi mathrm {i} theta _{j}}mathrm {e} ^{2pi mathrm {i} theta _{j}}psi (mathbf {r} )=u(mathbf {r} )}{displaystyle u(mathbf {r} +mathbf {a} _{j})=mathrm {e} ^{-mathrm {i} mathbf {k} cdot (mathbf {r} +mathbf {a} _{j})}psi (mathbf {r} +mathbf {a} _{j})={big (}mathrm {e} ^{-mathrm {i} mathbf {k} cdot mathbf {r} }mathrm {e} ^{-mathrm {i} mathbf {k} cdot mathbf {a} _{j}}{big )}{big (}mathrm {e} ^{2pi mathrm {i} theta _{j}}psi (mathbf {r} ){big )}=mathrm {e} ^{-mathrm {i} mathbf {k} cdot mathbf {r} }mathrm {e} ^{-2pi mathrm {i} theta _{j}}mathrm {e} ^{2pi mathrm {i} theta _{j}}psi (mathbf {r} )=u(mathbf {r} )}.

This proves that u has the periodicity of the lattice. Since ψ(r) = ei k · ru(r), that proves that the state is a Bloch wave.



Proof


Finally, we are ready for the main proof of Bloch's theorem.


As above, let T^n1,n2,n3{displaystyle {hat {T}}_{n_{1},n_{2},n_{3}}!}{hat  {T}}_{{n_{1},n_{2},n_{3}}}! denote a translation operator that shifts every wave function by the amount n1a1 + n2a2 + n3a3, where ni are integers. Because the crystal has translational symmetry, this operator commutes with the Hamiltonian operator. Moreover, every such translation operator commutes with every other. Therefore, there is a simultaneous eigenbasis of the Hamiltonian operator and every possible T^n1,n2,n3{displaystyle {hat {T}}_{n_{1},n_{2},n_{3}}!}{hat  {T}}_{{n_{1},n_{2},n_{3}}}! operator. This basis is what we are looking for. The wavefunctions in this basis are energy eigenstates (because they are eigenstates of the Hamiltonian), and they are also Bloch waves (because they are eigenstates of the translation operators; see Lemma above).



History and related equations


The concept of the Bloch state was developed by Felix Bloch in 1928, to describe the conduction of electrons in crystalline solids. The same underlying mathematics, however, was also discovered independently several times: by George William Hill (1877), Gaston Floquet (1883), and Alexander Lyapunov (1892). As a result, a variety of nomenclatures are common: applied to ordinary differential equations, it is called Floquet theory (or occasionally the Lyapunov–Floquet theorem). The general form of a one-dimensional periodic potential equation is Hill's equation:[2]


d2ydt2+f(t)y=0,{displaystyle {frac {d^{2}y}{dt^{2}}}+f(t)y=0,}{displaystyle {frac {d^{2}y}{dt^{2}}}+f(t)y=0,}

where f(t) is a periodic potential. Specific periodic one-dimensional equations include the Kronig–Penney model and Mathieu's equation.


Mathematically Bloch's theorem is interpreted in terms of unitary characters of a lattice group, and is applied to spectral geometry.[3][4][5]



See also




  • Bloch oscillations

  • Bloch wave – MoM method

  • Electronic band structure

  • Nearly free electron model

  • Periodic boundary conditions

  • Symmetries in quantum mechanics

  • Tight-binding model

  • Wannier function




References





  1. ^ Kittel, Charles (1996). Introduction to Solid State Physics. New York: Wiley. ISBN 0-471-14286-7..mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit}.mw-parser-output .citation q{quotes:"""""""'""'"}.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-free a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Lock-green.svg/9px-Lock-green.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-registration a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-gray-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .citation .cs1-lock-subscription a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-red-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration{color:#555}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration span{border-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help}.mw-parser-output .cs1-ws-icon a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg/12px-Wikisource-logo.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output code.cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:inherit;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-maint{display:none;color:#33aa33;margin-left:0.3em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration,.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-right{padding-right:0.2em}


  2. ^
    Magnus, W; Winkler, S (2004). Hill's Equation. Courier Dover. p. 11. ISBN 0-486-49565-5.



  3. ^ Kuchment, P.(1982), Floquet theory for partial differential equations, RUSS MATH SURV., 37,1-60


  4. ^ Katsuda, A.; Sunada, T (1987). "Homology and closed geodesics in a compact Riemann surface". Amer. J. Math. 110: 145–156. doi:10.2307/2374542.


  5. ^ Kotani M; Sunada T. (2000). "Albanese maps and an off diagonal long time asymptotic for the heat kernel". Comm. Math. Phys. 209: 633–670. Bibcode:2000CMaPh.209..633K. doi:10.1007/s002200050033.




Further reading




  • Neil W. Ashcroft & N. David Mermin (1976). Solid State Physics. Orlando: Harcourt. ISBN 0-03-049346-3.


  • Felix Bloch (1928). "Über die Quantenmechanik der Elektronen in Kristallgittern". Z. Phys. 52: 555–600. Bibcode:1929ZPhy...52..555B. doi:10.1007/BF01339455.


  • H. Föll. "Periodic Potentials and Bloch's Theorem – lectures in "Semiconductors I"". The University of Kiel.


  • M.S.P. Eastham (1973). The Spectral Theory of Periodic Differential Equations. Texts in Mathematics. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.


  • Gaston Floquet (1883). "Sur les équations différentielles linéaires à coefficients périodiques". Annales de l'École Normale Supérieure. 12: 47–88.


  • J. Gazalet; S. Dupont; J.C. Kastelik; Q. Rolland & B. Djafari-Rouhani (2013). "A tutorial survey on waves propagating in periodic media: Electronic, photonic and phononic crystals. Perception of the Bloch theorem in both real and Fourier domains". Wave Motion. 50 (3): 619–654. doi:10.1016/j.wavemoti.2012.12.010.


  • George William Hill (1886). "On the part of the motion of the lunar perigee which is a function of the mean motions of the sun and moon". Acta Math. 8: 1–36. doi:10.1007/BF02417081. This work was initially published and distributed privately in 1877.


  • Alexander Mihailovich Lyapunov (1992). The General Problem of the Stability of Motion. London: Taylor and Francis. Translated by A. T. Fuller from Edouard Davaux's French translation (1907) of the original Russian dissertation (1892).

  • Nick Thompson, "Bloch's Theorem via Representation Theory".




Popular posts from this blog

Guess what letter conforming each word

Port of Spain

Run scheduled task as local user group (not BUILTIN)