Imputation model for time series missing data in R
Time series data consists of:
Product (categorical); ProductGroup (categorical); Country (categorical); YearSinceProductLaunch (numeric); SalesAtLaunchYear (numeric)
Only "SalesAtLaunchYear" data has some missing values which needs to be imputed.
For some products, there is complete data, i.e. sales data exists for the launch year 1,2 and up to now.
Some other products, however, contain missing sales data only for the early years since launch. Products have different age, therefore sometimes there are 2 years since launch that are missing, sometimes there are 10 years, which depends on the product.
I am interested to find a model in R that can impute the missing time series data gaps. I have tried MICE by setting the model for "SalesAtLaunchYear" as random forest, but I am still getting some very high values of sales especially at the beginning of the product's launch. I am ensuring that at Year 0, all sales are 0 to avoid negative values. The data frame has 20000 rows with 300 unique products.
testdf = tibble::tribble(
~Country, ~ProductGroup, ~Product, ~YearSinceProductLaunch, ~SalesAtLaunchYear,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 0L, 0,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 1L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 2L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 3L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 4L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 5L, 206034.9814,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 6L, 170143.2623,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 7L, 212541.9306,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 8L, 270663.199,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 9L, 736738.3755,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 10L, 2579723.981,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 11L, 4964319.496,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 12L, 6864985.16,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 13L, 8793292.386,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 14L, 11416033.38,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 0L, 0,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 1L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 2L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 3L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 4L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 5L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 6L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 7L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 8L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 9L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 10L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 11L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 12L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 13L, 30806222.96,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 14L, 31456272,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 15L, 31853476.78,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 16L, 30379818,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 17L, 29765448.87,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 18L, 31376234,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 19L, 32628514.81,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 20L, 32732196,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 21L, 33503784.25,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 22L, 35163372,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 0L, 0,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 1L, 161884.081,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 2L, 7876925.474,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 3L, 12948209.55,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 4L, 13304401.76
)
testdf$Country = as.factor(testdf$Country)
testdf$ProductGroup = as.factor(testdf$ProductGroup)
testdf$Product = as.factor(testdf$Product)
r time-series missing-data imputation r-mice
add a comment |
Time series data consists of:
Product (categorical); ProductGroup (categorical); Country (categorical); YearSinceProductLaunch (numeric); SalesAtLaunchYear (numeric)
Only "SalesAtLaunchYear" data has some missing values which needs to be imputed.
For some products, there is complete data, i.e. sales data exists for the launch year 1,2 and up to now.
Some other products, however, contain missing sales data only for the early years since launch. Products have different age, therefore sometimes there are 2 years since launch that are missing, sometimes there are 10 years, which depends on the product.
I am interested to find a model in R that can impute the missing time series data gaps. I have tried MICE by setting the model for "SalesAtLaunchYear" as random forest, but I am still getting some very high values of sales especially at the beginning of the product's launch. I am ensuring that at Year 0, all sales are 0 to avoid negative values. The data frame has 20000 rows with 300 unique products.
testdf = tibble::tribble(
~Country, ~ProductGroup, ~Product, ~YearSinceProductLaunch, ~SalesAtLaunchYear,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 0L, 0,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 1L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 2L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 3L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 4L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 5L, 206034.9814,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 6L, 170143.2623,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 7L, 212541.9306,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 8L, 270663.199,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 9L, 736738.3755,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 10L, 2579723.981,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 11L, 4964319.496,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 12L, 6864985.16,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 13L, 8793292.386,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 14L, 11416033.38,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 0L, 0,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 1L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 2L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 3L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 4L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 5L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 6L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 7L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 8L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 9L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 10L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 11L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 12L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 13L, 30806222.96,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 14L, 31456272,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 15L, 31853476.78,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 16L, 30379818,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 17L, 29765448.87,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 18L, 31376234,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 19L, 32628514.81,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 20L, 32732196,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 21L, 33503784.25,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 22L, 35163372,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 0L, 0,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 1L, 161884.081,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 2L, 7876925.474,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 3L, 12948209.55,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 4L, 13304401.76
)
testdf$Country = as.factor(testdf$Country)
testdf$ProductGroup = as.factor(testdf$ProductGroup)
testdf$Product = as.factor(testdf$Product)
r time-series missing-data imputation r-mice
1
This question would be better with some data
– Gabriel Devillers
Nov 19 '18 at 19:03
Could you make your problem reproducible by sharing a sample of your data so others can help (please do not usestr()
,head()
or screenshot)? You can use thereprex
anddatapasta
packages to assist you with that. See also Help me Help you & How to make a great R reproducible example?
– Tung
Nov 19 '18 at 19:50
I have put test data.
– aza07
Nov 20 '18 at 9:48
add a comment |
Time series data consists of:
Product (categorical); ProductGroup (categorical); Country (categorical); YearSinceProductLaunch (numeric); SalesAtLaunchYear (numeric)
Only "SalesAtLaunchYear" data has some missing values which needs to be imputed.
For some products, there is complete data, i.e. sales data exists for the launch year 1,2 and up to now.
Some other products, however, contain missing sales data only for the early years since launch. Products have different age, therefore sometimes there are 2 years since launch that are missing, sometimes there are 10 years, which depends on the product.
I am interested to find a model in R that can impute the missing time series data gaps. I have tried MICE by setting the model for "SalesAtLaunchYear" as random forest, but I am still getting some very high values of sales especially at the beginning of the product's launch. I am ensuring that at Year 0, all sales are 0 to avoid negative values. The data frame has 20000 rows with 300 unique products.
testdf = tibble::tribble(
~Country, ~ProductGroup, ~Product, ~YearSinceProductLaunch, ~SalesAtLaunchYear,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 0L, 0,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 1L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 2L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 3L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 4L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 5L, 206034.9814,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 6L, 170143.2623,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 7L, 212541.9306,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 8L, 270663.199,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 9L, 736738.3755,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 10L, 2579723.981,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 11L, 4964319.496,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 12L, 6864985.16,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 13L, 8793292.386,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 14L, 11416033.38,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 0L, 0,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 1L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 2L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 3L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 4L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 5L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 6L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 7L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 8L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 9L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 10L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 11L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 12L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 13L, 30806222.96,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 14L, 31456272,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 15L, 31853476.78,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 16L, 30379818,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 17L, 29765448.87,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 18L, 31376234,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 19L, 32628514.81,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 20L, 32732196,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 21L, 33503784.25,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 22L, 35163372,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 0L, 0,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 1L, 161884.081,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 2L, 7876925.474,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 3L, 12948209.55,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 4L, 13304401.76
)
testdf$Country = as.factor(testdf$Country)
testdf$ProductGroup = as.factor(testdf$ProductGroup)
testdf$Product = as.factor(testdf$Product)
r time-series missing-data imputation r-mice
Time series data consists of:
Product (categorical); ProductGroup (categorical); Country (categorical); YearSinceProductLaunch (numeric); SalesAtLaunchYear (numeric)
Only "SalesAtLaunchYear" data has some missing values which needs to be imputed.
For some products, there is complete data, i.e. sales data exists for the launch year 1,2 and up to now.
Some other products, however, contain missing sales data only for the early years since launch. Products have different age, therefore sometimes there are 2 years since launch that are missing, sometimes there are 10 years, which depends on the product.
I am interested to find a model in R that can impute the missing time series data gaps. I have tried MICE by setting the model for "SalesAtLaunchYear" as random forest, but I am still getting some very high values of sales especially at the beginning of the product's launch. I am ensuring that at Year 0, all sales are 0 to avoid negative values. The data frame has 20000 rows with 300 unique products.
testdf = tibble::tribble(
~Country, ~ProductGroup, ~Product, ~YearSinceProductLaunch, ~SalesAtLaunchYear,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 0L, 0,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 1L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 2L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 3L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 4L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 5L, 206034.9814,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 6L, 170143.2623,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 7L, 212541.9306,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 8L, 270663.199,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 9L, 736738.3755,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 10L, 2579723.981,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 11L, 4964319.496,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 12L, 6864985.16,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 13L, 8793292.386,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 14L, 11416033.38,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 0L, 0,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 1L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 2L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 3L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 4L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 5L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 6L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 7L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 8L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 9L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 10L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 11L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 12L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 13L, 30806222.96,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 14L, 31456272,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 15L, 31853476.78,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 16L, 30379818,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 17L, 29765448.87,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 18L, 31376234,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 19L, 32628514.81,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 20L, 32732196,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 21L, 33503784.25,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 22L, 35163372,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 0L, 0,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 1L, 161884.081,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 2L, 7876925.474,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 3L, 12948209.55,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 4L, 13304401.76
)
testdf$Country = as.factor(testdf$Country)
testdf$ProductGroup = as.factor(testdf$ProductGroup)
testdf$Product = as.factor(testdf$Product)
r time-series missing-data imputation r-mice
r time-series missing-data imputation r-mice
edited Nov 19 '18 at 21:36
aza07
asked Nov 19 '18 at 17:15
aza07aza07
991313
991313
1
This question would be better with some data
– Gabriel Devillers
Nov 19 '18 at 19:03
Could you make your problem reproducible by sharing a sample of your data so others can help (please do not usestr()
,head()
or screenshot)? You can use thereprex
anddatapasta
packages to assist you with that. See also Help me Help you & How to make a great R reproducible example?
– Tung
Nov 19 '18 at 19:50
I have put test data.
– aza07
Nov 20 '18 at 9:48
add a comment |
1
This question would be better with some data
– Gabriel Devillers
Nov 19 '18 at 19:03
Could you make your problem reproducible by sharing a sample of your data so others can help (please do not usestr()
,head()
or screenshot)? You can use thereprex
anddatapasta
packages to assist you with that. See also Help me Help you & How to make a great R reproducible example?
– Tung
Nov 19 '18 at 19:50
I have put test data.
– aza07
Nov 20 '18 at 9:48
1
1
This question would be better with some data
– Gabriel Devillers
Nov 19 '18 at 19:03
This question would be better with some data
– Gabriel Devillers
Nov 19 '18 at 19:03
Could you make your problem reproducible by sharing a sample of your data so others can help (please do not use
str()
, head()
or screenshot)? You can use the reprex
and datapasta
packages to assist you with that. See also Help me Help you & How to make a great R reproducible example?– Tung
Nov 19 '18 at 19:50
Could you make your problem reproducible by sharing a sample of your data so others can help (please do not use
str()
, head()
or screenshot)? You can use the reprex
and datapasta
packages to assist you with that. See also Help me Help you & How to make a great R reproducible example?– Tung
Nov 19 '18 at 19:50
I have put test data.
– aza07
Nov 20 '18 at 9:48
I have put test data.
– aza07
Nov 20 '18 at 9:48
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Probably using mice will not give you the desired results. Since it mostly uses inter-variable correlations. You are looking more for correlations in time.
My recommendation for this specific example would be to split the dataset into Country, ProductGroup, Product groups and perform imputation on these with a time series imputation package.
Looking at your data I think something like the function na.interpolation from package imputeTS would already do a good job.
That is how you call it:
library("imputeTS")
na.interpolation(yourTimeSeries)
You would have to call it multiple times for each time series you created out of the each Country, ProductGroup, Product.
You can also just run
na.interpolation(testdf$SalesAtLaunchYear)
On your whole dataset which is easier - in the example you showed this would also work. (might lead to problems if the rest is structured differently or you are using a different algorithm from imputeTS package)
Thanks, I was already looking into this package, too. I will try and report results. I was wondering how to control within this library or using some other models the country effect and product group effect. To clarify, there is also some products for which sales for all years since launch are available, from which country growth can be learned.
– aza07
Nov 25 '18 at 19:46
I see, so there might be some inter-variable correlations you also can employ. You could try the package AMELIAII then. Chapter 4.6 / p.20 in the manual gives some hints on how to also consider the time aspects: cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Amelia/vignettes/amelia.pdf . It's only setting some parameters. I still would compare against results form e.g. imputeTS - often when the time correlations are way stronger than your inter-variable correlations you fare better with a sole time series imputation method.
– stats0007
Nov 26 '18 at 15:23
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53379636%2fimputation-model-for-time-series-missing-data-in-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Probably using mice will not give you the desired results. Since it mostly uses inter-variable correlations. You are looking more for correlations in time.
My recommendation for this specific example would be to split the dataset into Country, ProductGroup, Product groups and perform imputation on these with a time series imputation package.
Looking at your data I think something like the function na.interpolation from package imputeTS would already do a good job.
That is how you call it:
library("imputeTS")
na.interpolation(yourTimeSeries)
You would have to call it multiple times for each time series you created out of the each Country, ProductGroup, Product.
You can also just run
na.interpolation(testdf$SalesAtLaunchYear)
On your whole dataset which is easier - in the example you showed this would also work. (might lead to problems if the rest is structured differently or you are using a different algorithm from imputeTS package)
Thanks, I was already looking into this package, too. I will try and report results. I was wondering how to control within this library or using some other models the country effect and product group effect. To clarify, there is also some products for which sales for all years since launch are available, from which country growth can be learned.
– aza07
Nov 25 '18 at 19:46
I see, so there might be some inter-variable correlations you also can employ. You could try the package AMELIAII then. Chapter 4.6 / p.20 in the manual gives some hints on how to also consider the time aspects: cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Amelia/vignettes/amelia.pdf . It's only setting some parameters. I still would compare against results form e.g. imputeTS - often when the time correlations are way stronger than your inter-variable correlations you fare better with a sole time series imputation method.
– stats0007
Nov 26 '18 at 15:23
add a comment |
Probably using mice will not give you the desired results. Since it mostly uses inter-variable correlations. You are looking more for correlations in time.
My recommendation for this specific example would be to split the dataset into Country, ProductGroup, Product groups and perform imputation on these with a time series imputation package.
Looking at your data I think something like the function na.interpolation from package imputeTS would already do a good job.
That is how you call it:
library("imputeTS")
na.interpolation(yourTimeSeries)
You would have to call it multiple times for each time series you created out of the each Country, ProductGroup, Product.
You can also just run
na.interpolation(testdf$SalesAtLaunchYear)
On your whole dataset which is easier - in the example you showed this would also work. (might lead to problems if the rest is structured differently or you are using a different algorithm from imputeTS package)
Thanks, I was already looking into this package, too. I will try and report results. I was wondering how to control within this library or using some other models the country effect and product group effect. To clarify, there is also some products for which sales for all years since launch are available, from which country growth can be learned.
– aza07
Nov 25 '18 at 19:46
I see, so there might be some inter-variable correlations you also can employ. You could try the package AMELIAII then. Chapter 4.6 / p.20 in the manual gives some hints on how to also consider the time aspects: cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Amelia/vignettes/amelia.pdf . It's only setting some parameters. I still would compare against results form e.g. imputeTS - often when the time correlations are way stronger than your inter-variable correlations you fare better with a sole time series imputation method.
– stats0007
Nov 26 '18 at 15:23
add a comment |
Probably using mice will not give you the desired results. Since it mostly uses inter-variable correlations. You are looking more for correlations in time.
My recommendation for this specific example would be to split the dataset into Country, ProductGroup, Product groups and perform imputation on these with a time series imputation package.
Looking at your data I think something like the function na.interpolation from package imputeTS would already do a good job.
That is how you call it:
library("imputeTS")
na.interpolation(yourTimeSeries)
You would have to call it multiple times for each time series you created out of the each Country, ProductGroup, Product.
You can also just run
na.interpolation(testdf$SalesAtLaunchYear)
On your whole dataset which is easier - in the example you showed this would also work. (might lead to problems if the rest is structured differently or you are using a different algorithm from imputeTS package)
Probably using mice will not give you the desired results. Since it mostly uses inter-variable correlations. You are looking more for correlations in time.
My recommendation for this specific example would be to split the dataset into Country, ProductGroup, Product groups and perform imputation on these with a time series imputation package.
Looking at your data I think something like the function na.interpolation from package imputeTS would already do a good job.
That is how you call it:
library("imputeTS")
na.interpolation(yourTimeSeries)
You would have to call it multiple times for each time series you created out of the each Country, ProductGroup, Product.
You can also just run
na.interpolation(testdf$SalesAtLaunchYear)
On your whole dataset which is easier - in the example you showed this would also work. (might lead to problems if the rest is structured differently or you are using a different algorithm from imputeTS package)
edited Nov 24 '18 at 7:08
answered Nov 24 '18 at 6:59
stats0007stats0007
916626
916626
Thanks, I was already looking into this package, too. I will try and report results. I was wondering how to control within this library or using some other models the country effect and product group effect. To clarify, there is also some products for which sales for all years since launch are available, from which country growth can be learned.
– aza07
Nov 25 '18 at 19:46
I see, so there might be some inter-variable correlations you also can employ. You could try the package AMELIAII then. Chapter 4.6 / p.20 in the manual gives some hints on how to also consider the time aspects: cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Amelia/vignettes/amelia.pdf . It's only setting some parameters. I still would compare against results form e.g. imputeTS - often when the time correlations are way stronger than your inter-variable correlations you fare better with a sole time series imputation method.
– stats0007
Nov 26 '18 at 15:23
add a comment |
Thanks, I was already looking into this package, too. I will try and report results. I was wondering how to control within this library or using some other models the country effect and product group effect. To clarify, there is also some products for which sales for all years since launch are available, from which country growth can be learned.
– aza07
Nov 25 '18 at 19:46
I see, so there might be some inter-variable correlations you also can employ. You could try the package AMELIAII then. Chapter 4.6 / p.20 in the manual gives some hints on how to also consider the time aspects: cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Amelia/vignettes/amelia.pdf . It's only setting some parameters. I still would compare against results form e.g. imputeTS - often when the time correlations are way stronger than your inter-variable correlations you fare better with a sole time series imputation method.
– stats0007
Nov 26 '18 at 15:23
Thanks, I was already looking into this package, too. I will try and report results. I was wondering how to control within this library or using some other models the country effect and product group effect. To clarify, there is also some products for which sales for all years since launch are available, from which country growth can be learned.
– aza07
Nov 25 '18 at 19:46
Thanks, I was already looking into this package, too. I will try and report results. I was wondering how to control within this library or using some other models the country effect and product group effect. To clarify, there is also some products for which sales for all years since launch are available, from which country growth can be learned.
– aza07
Nov 25 '18 at 19:46
I see, so there might be some inter-variable correlations you also can employ. You could try the package AMELIAII then. Chapter 4.6 / p.20 in the manual gives some hints on how to also consider the time aspects: cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Amelia/vignettes/amelia.pdf . It's only setting some parameters. I still would compare against results form e.g. imputeTS - often when the time correlations are way stronger than your inter-variable correlations you fare better with a sole time series imputation method.
– stats0007
Nov 26 '18 at 15:23
I see, so there might be some inter-variable correlations you also can employ. You could try the package AMELIAII then. Chapter 4.6 / p.20 in the manual gives some hints on how to also consider the time aspects: cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Amelia/vignettes/amelia.pdf . It's only setting some parameters. I still would compare against results form e.g. imputeTS - often when the time correlations are way stronger than your inter-variable correlations you fare better with a sole time series imputation method.
– stats0007
Nov 26 '18 at 15:23
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53379636%2fimputation-model-for-time-series-missing-data-in-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
This question would be better with some data
– Gabriel Devillers
Nov 19 '18 at 19:03
Could you make your problem reproducible by sharing a sample of your data so others can help (please do not use
str()
,head()
or screenshot)? You can use thereprex
anddatapasta
packages to assist you with that. See also Help me Help you & How to make a great R reproducible example?– Tung
Nov 19 '18 at 19:50
I have put test data.
– aza07
Nov 20 '18 at 9:48