set marker to scale with y axis (with limits)
I want to scale my marker points with my y-axis values in matplotlib. I thought i could use "counts" from pandas to count the instances of each y-axis value, then set that range to the size values of my scatterplot, but the scale is all messed up and the marker points become huge (the range of y-axis values range from 1 to 17,000). What is a good way to scale this number back to something between 1 and 10?
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
data = pd.read_excel("dataset.xlsx")
scale_range = pd.value_counts(data["y_axis"].values, sort = True))
plt.scatter(data["x_axis"], data["y_axis"], s = scale_range)
plt.axis([0, 120, 0, 1])
plt.show('dataset_out.png')
Any help is appreciated, thanks.
python matplotlib
|
show 2 more comments
I want to scale my marker points with my y-axis values in matplotlib. I thought i could use "counts" from pandas to count the instances of each y-axis value, then set that range to the size values of my scatterplot, but the scale is all messed up and the marker points become huge (the range of y-axis values range from 1 to 17,000). What is a good way to scale this number back to something between 1 and 10?
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
data = pd.read_excel("dataset.xlsx")
scale_range = pd.value_counts(data["y_axis"].values, sort = True))
plt.scatter(data["x_axis"], data["y_axis"], s = scale_range)
plt.axis([0, 120, 0, 1])
plt.show('dataset_out.png')
Any help is appreciated, thanks.
python matplotlib
2
Divide by 1700?
– busybear
Nov 20 '18 at 19:52
lol yeah i gues i could find some percent to make the values in line to the scale i want. I was looking for a more "pythonic" way of doing it, Thanks though!
– Dane Kania
Nov 20 '18 at 19:54
I think that's a pretty "pythonic" method. It's straightforward at least. Another thing you might want to consider issize
sets the area and not the diameter.
– busybear
Nov 20 '18 at 20:03
I wonder why that approach works at all.value_counts
will produce a series of unique elements of its argument, which are generally less than the number of total elements. So either each value occurs exactly once, then you get all1
inscale_range
, orscale_range
does not even have as many elements asx_axis
, which might throw an error, or at least will give an incorrect plot. In that sense, why not use the y_axis values themselves?plt.scatter(data["x_axis"], data["y_axis"], s = data["y_axis"]+10)
?
– ImportanceOfBeingErnest
Nov 20 '18 at 20:06
I tried your method and it doesnt scale at all. Im not really sure why, your method seems like a fine idea.
– Dane Kania
Nov 20 '18 at 20:25
|
show 2 more comments
I want to scale my marker points with my y-axis values in matplotlib. I thought i could use "counts" from pandas to count the instances of each y-axis value, then set that range to the size values of my scatterplot, but the scale is all messed up and the marker points become huge (the range of y-axis values range from 1 to 17,000). What is a good way to scale this number back to something between 1 and 10?
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
data = pd.read_excel("dataset.xlsx")
scale_range = pd.value_counts(data["y_axis"].values, sort = True))
plt.scatter(data["x_axis"], data["y_axis"], s = scale_range)
plt.axis([0, 120, 0, 1])
plt.show('dataset_out.png')
Any help is appreciated, thanks.
python matplotlib
I want to scale my marker points with my y-axis values in matplotlib. I thought i could use "counts" from pandas to count the instances of each y-axis value, then set that range to the size values of my scatterplot, but the scale is all messed up and the marker points become huge (the range of y-axis values range from 1 to 17,000). What is a good way to scale this number back to something between 1 and 10?
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
data = pd.read_excel("dataset.xlsx")
scale_range = pd.value_counts(data["y_axis"].values, sort = True))
plt.scatter(data["x_axis"], data["y_axis"], s = scale_range)
plt.axis([0, 120, 0, 1])
plt.show('dataset_out.png')
Any help is appreciated, thanks.
python matplotlib
python matplotlib
edited Nov 20 '18 at 19:52
Dane Kania
asked Nov 20 '18 at 19:49
Dane KaniaDane Kania
256
256
2
Divide by 1700?
– busybear
Nov 20 '18 at 19:52
lol yeah i gues i could find some percent to make the values in line to the scale i want. I was looking for a more "pythonic" way of doing it, Thanks though!
– Dane Kania
Nov 20 '18 at 19:54
I think that's a pretty "pythonic" method. It's straightforward at least. Another thing you might want to consider issize
sets the area and not the diameter.
– busybear
Nov 20 '18 at 20:03
I wonder why that approach works at all.value_counts
will produce a series of unique elements of its argument, which are generally less than the number of total elements. So either each value occurs exactly once, then you get all1
inscale_range
, orscale_range
does not even have as many elements asx_axis
, which might throw an error, or at least will give an incorrect plot. In that sense, why not use the y_axis values themselves?plt.scatter(data["x_axis"], data["y_axis"], s = data["y_axis"]+10)
?
– ImportanceOfBeingErnest
Nov 20 '18 at 20:06
I tried your method and it doesnt scale at all. Im not really sure why, your method seems like a fine idea.
– Dane Kania
Nov 20 '18 at 20:25
|
show 2 more comments
2
Divide by 1700?
– busybear
Nov 20 '18 at 19:52
lol yeah i gues i could find some percent to make the values in line to the scale i want. I was looking for a more "pythonic" way of doing it, Thanks though!
– Dane Kania
Nov 20 '18 at 19:54
I think that's a pretty "pythonic" method. It's straightforward at least. Another thing you might want to consider issize
sets the area and not the diameter.
– busybear
Nov 20 '18 at 20:03
I wonder why that approach works at all.value_counts
will produce a series of unique elements of its argument, which are generally less than the number of total elements. So either each value occurs exactly once, then you get all1
inscale_range
, orscale_range
does not even have as many elements asx_axis
, which might throw an error, or at least will give an incorrect plot. In that sense, why not use the y_axis values themselves?plt.scatter(data["x_axis"], data["y_axis"], s = data["y_axis"]+10)
?
– ImportanceOfBeingErnest
Nov 20 '18 at 20:06
I tried your method and it doesnt scale at all. Im not really sure why, your method seems like a fine idea.
– Dane Kania
Nov 20 '18 at 20:25
2
2
Divide by 1700?
– busybear
Nov 20 '18 at 19:52
Divide by 1700?
– busybear
Nov 20 '18 at 19:52
lol yeah i gues i could find some percent to make the values in line to the scale i want. I was looking for a more "pythonic" way of doing it, Thanks though!
– Dane Kania
Nov 20 '18 at 19:54
lol yeah i gues i could find some percent to make the values in line to the scale i want. I was looking for a more "pythonic" way of doing it, Thanks though!
– Dane Kania
Nov 20 '18 at 19:54
I think that's a pretty "pythonic" method. It's straightforward at least. Another thing you might want to consider is
size
sets the area and not the diameter.– busybear
Nov 20 '18 at 20:03
I think that's a pretty "pythonic" method. It's straightforward at least. Another thing you might want to consider is
size
sets the area and not the diameter.– busybear
Nov 20 '18 at 20:03
I wonder why that approach works at all.
value_counts
will produce a series of unique elements of its argument, which are generally less than the number of total elements. So either each value occurs exactly once, then you get all 1
in scale_range
, or scale_range
does not even have as many elements as x_axis
, which might throw an error, or at least will give an incorrect plot. In that sense, why not use the y_axis values themselves? plt.scatter(data["x_axis"], data["y_axis"], s = data["y_axis"]+10)
?– ImportanceOfBeingErnest
Nov 20 '18 at 20:06
I wonder why that approach works at all.
value_counts
will produce a series of unique elements of its argument, which are generally less than the number of total elements. So either each value occurs exactly once, then you get all 1
in scale_range
, or scale_range
does not even have as many elements as x_axis
, which might throw an error, or at least will give an incorrect plot. In that sense, why not use the y_axis values themselves? plt.scatter(data["x_axis"], data["y_axis"], s = data["y_axis"]+10)
?– ImportanceOfBeingErnest
Nov 20 '18 at 20:06
I tried your method and it doesnt scale at all. Im not really sure why, your method seems like a fine idea.
– Dane Kania
Nov 20 '18 at 20:25
I tried your method and it doesnt scale at all. Im not really sure why, your method seems like a fine idea.
– Dane Kania
Nov 20 '18 at 20:25
|
show 2 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53400518%2fset-marker-to-scale-with-y-axis-with-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53400518%2fset-marker-to-scale-with-y-axis-with-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Divide by 1700?
– busybear
Nov 20 '18 at 19:52
lol yeah i gues i could find some percent to make the values in line to the scale i want. I was looking for a more "pythonic" way of doing it, Thanks though!
– Dane Kania
Nov 20 '18 at 19:54
I think that's a pretty "pythonic" method. It's straightforward at least. Another thing you might want to consider is
size
sets the area and not the diameter.– busybear
Nov 20 '18 at 20:03
I wonder why that approach works at all.
value_counts
will produce a series of unique elements of its argument, which are generally less than the number of total elements. So either each value occurs exactly once, then you get all1
inscale_range
, orscale_range
does not even have as many elements asx_axis
, which might throw an error, or at least will give an incorrect plot. In that sense, why not use the y_axis values themselves?plt.scatter(data["x_axis"], data["y_axis"], s = data["y_axis"]+10)
?– ImportanceOfBeingErnest
Nov 20 '18 at 20:06
I tried your method and it doesnt scale at all. Im not really sure why, your method seems like a fine idea.
– Dane Kania
Nov 20 '18 at 20:25