Getting TLE in hackerearth











up vote
-4
down vote

favorite












When i submiting this code at hackerearth i am getting TLE.



Any suggestions how can i optimise this
Code.



#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

int checkPrime(int);

int main() {
int a, b,
reminder,sum=0,n;

scanf("%d %d",&a,&b);

while(a <= b) {
n = a;
sum = 0;
reminder = 0;

while (n > 0) {
reminder = n % 10;
sum += reminder;
n = n / 10;
}

if(sum > 1 && checkPrime(sum) == 1 && checkPrime(a) == 1) {
printf("%d ",a);
}

++a;
}

return 0;
}

int checkPrime(int p) {

int i,flag=1;

for(i=2; i <= p / 2; i++){
if(p%i == 0) {
flag = 0;
break;
}
}

return flag;

}


Here is the problem i coded for



And how can i analysis this code and get
Time complexity.










share|improve this question






















  • and what is TLE ?
    – u__
    Nov 8 at 9:21






  • 1




    @u__ Time Limit Exceeded. And that's the problem that needs to be solved. The task at face value is usually not so difficult as finding an effiecient solution.
    – Weather Vane
    Nov 8 at 9:22










  • Typically being able to derive the time complexity for a specific algorithm is very useful to improve it.
    – Willem Van Onsem
    Nov 8 at 9:23






  • 1




    There are plenty of examples on SO of more efficient prime algorithms. For example, why are you checking every even divisor? 2 is the only even prime. That change alone will halve the run time.
    – Weather Vane
    Nov 8 at 9:24












  • Please give your question a more descriptive title, so that other users with a similar problem can find it.
    – m69
    Nov 9 at 3:26















up vote
-4
down vote

favorite












When i submiting this code at hackerearth i am getting TLE.



Any suggestions how can i optimise this
Code.



#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

int checkPrime(int);

int main() {
int a, b,
reminder,sum=0,n;

scanf("%d %d",&a,&b);

while(a <= b) {
n = a;
sum = 0;
reminder = 0;

while (n > 0) {
reminder = n % 10;
sum += reminder;
n = n / 10;
}

if(sum > 1 && checkPrime(sum) == 1 && checkPrime(a) == 1) {
printf("%d ",a);
}

++a;
}

return 0;
}

int checkPrime(int p) {

int i,flag=1;

for(i=2; i <= p / 2; i++){
if(p%i == 0) {
flag = 0;
break;
}
}

return flag;

}


Here is the problem i coded for



And how can i analysis this code and get
Time complexity.










share|improve this question






















  • and what is TLE ?
    – u__
    Nov 8 at 9:21






  • 1




    @u__ Time Limit Exceeded. And that's the problem that needs to be solved. The task at face value is usually not so difficult as finding an effiecient solution.
    – Weather Vane
    Nov 8 at 9:22










  • Typically being able to derive the time complexity for a specific algorithm is very useful to improve it.
    – Willem Van Onsem
    Nov 8 at 9:23






  • 1




    There are plenty of examples on SO of more efficient prime algorithms. For example, why are you checking every even divisor? 2 is the only even prime. That change alone will halve the run time.
    – Weather Vane
    Nov 8 at 9:24












  • Please give your question a more descriptive title, so that other users with a similar problem can find it.
    – m69
    Nov 9 at 3:26













up vote
-4
down vote

favorite









up vote
-4
down vote

favorite











When i submiting this code at hackerearth i am getting TLE.



Any suggestions how can i optimise this
Code.



#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

int checkPrime(int);

int main() {
int a, b,
reminder,sum=0,n;

scanf("%d %d",&a,&b);

while(a <= b) {
n = a;
sum = 0;
reminder = 0;

while (n > 0) {
reminder = n % 10;
sum += reminder;
n = n / 10;
}

if(sum > 1 && checkPrime(sum) == 1 && checkPrime(a) == 1) {
printf("%d ",a);
}

++a;
}

return 0;
}

int checkPrime(int p) {

int i,flag=1;

for(i=2; i <= p / 2; i++){
if(p%i == 0) {
flag = 0;
break;
}
}

return flag;

}


Here is the problem i coded for



And how can i analysis this code and get
Time complexity.










share|improve this question













When i submiting this code at hackerearth i am getting TLE.



Any suggestions how can i optimise this
Code.



#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

int checkPrime(int);

int main() {
int a, b,
reminder,sum=0,n;

scanf("%d %d",&a,&b);

while(a <= b) {
n = a;
sum = 0;
reminder = 0;

while (n > 0) {
reminder = n % 10;
sum += reminder;
n = n / 10;
}

if(sum > 1 && checkPrime(sum) == 1 && checkPrime(a) == 1) {
printf("%d ",a);
}

++a;
}

return 0;
}

int checkPrime(int p) {

int i,flag=1;

for(i=2; i <= p / 2; i++){
if(p%i == 0) {
flag = 0;
break;
}
}

return flag;

}


Here is the problem i coded for



And how can i analysis this code and get
Time complexity.







c++ c algorithm primes






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 8 at 9:18









md. motailab

186




186












  • and what is TLE ?
    – u__
    Nov 8 at 9:21






  • 1




    @u__ Time Limit Exceeded. And that's the problem that needs to be solved. The task at face value is usually not so difficult as finding an effiecient solution.
    – Weather Vane
    Nov 8 at 9:22










  • Typically being able to derive the time complexity for a specific algorithm is very useful to improve it.
    – Willem Van Onsem
    Nov 8 at 9:23






  • 1




    There are plenty of examples on SO of more efficient prime algorithms. For example, why are you checking every even divisor? 2 is the only even prime. That change alone will halve the run time.
    – Weather Vane
    Nov 8 at 9:24












  • Please give your question a more descriptive title, so that other users with a similar problem can find it.
    – m69
    Nov 9 at 3:26


















  • and what is TLE ?
    – u__
    Nov 8 at 9:21






  • 1




    @u__ Time Limit Exceeded. And that's the problem that needs to be solved. The task at face value is usually not so difficult as finding an effiecient solution.
    – Weather Vane
    Nov 8 at 9:22










  • Typically being able to derive the time complexity for a specific algorithm is very useful to improve it.
    – Willem Van Onsem
    Nov 8 at 9:23






  • 1




    There are plenty of examples on SO of more efficient prime algorithms. For example, why are you checking every even divisor? 2 is the only even prime. That change alone will halve the run time.
    – Weather Vane
    Nov 8 at 9:24












  • Please give your question a more descriptive title, so that other users with a similar problem can find it.
    – m69
    Nov 9 at 3:26
















and what is TLE ?
– u__
Nov 8 at 9:21




and what is TLE ?
– u__
Nov 8 at 9:21




1




1




@u__ Time Limit Exceeded. And that's the problem that needs to be solved. The task at face value is usually not so difficult as finding an effiecient solution.
– Weather Vane
Nov 8 at 9:22




@u__ Time Limit Exceeded. And that's the problem that needs to be solved. The task at face value is usually not so difficult as finding an effiecient solution.
– Weather Vane
Nov 8 at 9:22












Typically being able to derive the time complexity for a specific algorithm is very useful to improve it.
– Willem Van Onsem
Nov 8 at 9:23




Typically being able to derive the time complexity for a specific algorithm is very useful to improve it.
– Willem Van Onsem
Nov 8 at 9:23




1




1




There are plenty of examples on SO of more efficient prime algorithms. For example, why are you checking every even divisor? 2 is the only even prime. That change alone will halve the run time.
– Weather Vane
Nov 8 at 9:24






There are plenty of examples on SO of more efficient prime algorithms. For example, why are you checking every even divisor? 2 is the only even prime. That change alone will halve the run time.
– Weather Vane
Nov 8 at 9:24














Please give your question a more descriptive title, so that other users with a similar problem can find it.
– m69
Nov 9 at 3:26




Please give your question a more descriptive title, so that other users with a similar problem can find it.
– m69
Nov 9 at 3:26












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Your checkprime function takes a lot of runtime. It runs for N/2 operations.



You are running this for all the numbers, so you are running for N*N/2 operations, which is too much.



I would suggest that you use a better method of generating the primes. Take a look at the Sieve of Eratosthenes






share|improve this answer





















  • Even checking all odd numbers (and 2) up to sqrt(N) would probably do the trick. Or all 6n+1 and 6n-1 if you want to be fancy.
    – Max Langhof
    Nov 8 at 9:32












  • Thanks man get accepted sqrt(n) worked #Max Langhof
    – md. motailab
    Nov 8 at 9:46










  • Thanks all for your kindness :)
    – md. motailab
    Nov 8 at 9:47


















up vote
1
down vote













There are some primitive ways like this one for instance, looping through the odd numbers and some more optimizations



int isPrime ( int n )
{
if (n <= 1) return 0; // zero and one are not prime
unsigned int i;
for (i=2; i*i<=n; i++) {
if (n % i == 0) return 0;
}
return 1;
}


Seive is kind of over-kill, in your case ( if you are not taking in to consideration your memory requirements ) because the range could be very very large 1000000 you might want to use some sort of bitmap to generate the Seive.



here is a very loosely written Idea of how to generate and use Seive.



char *seive;

void generate_seive( int n )
{
seive = calloc( 1, n );
if( !seive )
{
printf("E...");
exit(0);
}

// Generate Seive
for( int i = 2; i < n ; i ++)
{
if( seive[i] == 1 )
continue;
// Essentially mark all primes as 0 and
// non-primes as 1's
seive[i] = 0;
for( int j = i + i ; j < n ; j += i )
seive[j] = 1;
}
}

int main()
{
generate_seive(100);

// Iterating through the generated Seive
// should do
for( int i = 2; i < 100 ; i ++ )
if( seive[i] == 0 )
printf("%dn", i);
return 0;
}





share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53204676%2fgetting-tle-in-hackerearth%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest
































    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    Your checkprime function takes a lot of runtime. It runs for N/2 operations.



    You are running this for all the numbers, so you are running for N*N/2 operations, which is too much.



    I would suggest that you use a better method of generating the primes. Take a look at the Sieve of Eratosthenes






    share|improve this answer





















    • Even checking all odd numbers (and 2) up to sqrt(N) would probably do the trick. Or all 6n+1 and 6n-1 if you want to be fancy.
      – Max Langhof
      Nov 8 at 9:32












    • Thanks man get accepted sqrt(n) worked #Max Langhof
      – md. motailab
      Nov 8 at 9:46










    • Thanks all for your kindness :)
      – md. motailab
      Nov 8 at 9:47















    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    Your checkprime function takes a lot of runtime. It runs for N/2 operations.



    You are running this for all the numbers, so you are running for N*N/2 operations, which is too much.



    I would suggest that you use a better method of generating the primes. Take a look at the Sieve of Eratosthenes






    share|improve this answer





















    • Even checking all odd numbers (and 2) up to sqrt(N) would probably do the trick. Or all 6n+1 and 6n-1 if you want to be fancy.
      – Max Langhof
      Nov 8 at 9:32












    • Thanks man get accepted sqrt(n) worked #Max Langhof
      – md. motailab
      Nov 8 at 9:46










    • Thanks all for your kindness :)
      – md. motailab
      Nov 8 at 9:47













    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted






    Your checkprime function takes a lot of runtime. It runs for N/2 operations.



    You are running this for all the numbers, so you are running for N*N/2 operations, which is too much.



    I would suggest that you use a better method of generating the primes. Take a look at the Sieve of Eratosthenes






    share|improve this answer












    Your checkprime function takes a lot of runtime. It runs for N/2 operations.



    You are running this for all the numbers, so you are running for N*N/2 operations, which is too much.



    I would suggest that you use a better method of generating the primes. Take a look at the Sieve of Eratosthenes







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Nov 8 at 9:23









    Rishikesh Raje

    5,0261825




    5,0261825












    • Even checking all odd numbers (and 2) up to sqrt(N) would probably do the trick. Or all 6n+1 and 6n-1 if you want to be fancy.
      – Max Langhof
      Nov 8 at 9:32












    • Thanks man get accepted sqrt(n) worked #Max Langhof
      – md. motailab
      Nov 8 at 9:46










    • Thanks all for your kindness :)
      – md. motailab
      Nov 8 at 9:47


















    • Even checking all odd numbers (and 2) up to sqrt(N) would probably do the trick. Or all 6n+1 and 6n-1 if you want to be fancy.
      – Max Langhof
      Nov 8 at 9:32












    • Thanks man get accepted sqrt(n) worked #Max Langhof
      – md. motailab
      Nov 8 at 9:46










    • Thanks all for your kindness :)
      – md. motailab
      Nov 8 at 9:47
















    Even checking all odd numbers (and 2) up to sqrt(N) would probably do the trick. Or all 6n+1 and 6n-1 if you want to be fancy.
    – Max Langhof
    Nov 8 at 9:32






    Even checking all odd numbers (and 2) up to sqrt(N) would probably do the trick. Or all 6n+1 and 6n-1 if you want to be fancy.
    – Max Langhof
    Nov 8 at 9:32














    Thanks man get accepted sqrt(n) worked #Max Langhof
    – md. motailab
    Nov 8 at 9:46




    Thanks man get accepted sqrt(n) worked #Max Langhof
    – md. motailab
    Nov 8 at 9:46












    Thanks all for your kindness :)
    – md. motailab
    Nov 8 at 9:47




    Thanks all for your kindness :)
    – md. motailab
    Nov 8 at 9:47












    up vote
    1
    down vote













    There are some primitive ways like this one for instance, looping through the odd numbers and some more optimizations



    int isPrime ( int n )
    {
    if (n <= 1) return 0; // zero and one are not prime
    unsigned int i;
    for (i=2; i*i<=n; i++) {
    if (n % i == 0) return 0;
    }
    return 1;
    }


    Seive is kind of over-kill, in your case ( if you are not taking in to consideration your memory requirements ) because the range could be very very large 1000000 you might want to use some sort of bitmap to generate the Seive.



    here is a very loosely written Idea of how to generate and use Seive.



    char *seive;

    void generate_seive( int n )
    {
    seive = calloc( 1, n );
    if( !seive )
    {
    printf("E...");
    exit(0);
    }

    // Generate Seive
    for( int i = 2; i < n ; i ++)
    {
    if( seive[i] == 1 )
    continue;
    // Essentially mark all primes as 0 and
    // non-primes as 1's
    seive[i] = 0;
    for( int j = i + i ; j < n ; j += i )
    seive[j] = 1;
    }
    }

    int main()
    {
    generate_seive(100);

    // Iterating through the generated Seive
    // should do
    for( int i = 2; i < 100 ; i ++ )
    if( seive[i] == 0 )
    printf("%dn", i);
    return 0;
    }





    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      There are some primitive ways like this one for instance, looping through the odd numbers and some more optimizations



      int isPrime ( int n )
      {
      if (n <= 1) return 0; // zero and one are not prime
      unsigned int i;
      for (i=2; i*i<=n; i++) {
      if (n % i == 0) return 0;
      }
      return 1;
      }


      Seive is kind of over-kill, in your case ( if you are not taking in to consideration your memory requirements ) because the range could be very very large 1000000 you might want to use some sort of bitmap to generate the Seive.



      here is a very loosely written Idea of how to generate and use Seive.



      char *seive;

      void generate_seive( int n )
      {
      seive = calloc( 1, n );
      if( !seive )
      {
      printf("E...");
      exit(0);
      }

      // Generate Seive
      for( int i = 2; i < n ; i ++)
      {
      if( seive[i] == 1 )
      continue;
      // Essentially mark all primes as 0 and
      // non-primes as 1's
      seive[i] = 0;
      for( int j = i + i ; j < n ; j += i )
      seive[j] = 1;
      }
      }

      int main()
      {
      generate_seive(100);

      // Iterating through the generated Seive
      // should do
      for( int i = 2; i < 100 ; i ++ )
      if( seive[i] == 0 )
      printf("%dn", i);
      return 0;
      }





      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        There are some primitive ways like this one for instance, looping through the odd numbers and some more optimizations



        int isPrime ( int n )
        {
        if (n <= 1) return 0; // zero and one are not prime
        unsigned int i;
        for (i=2; i*i<=n; i++) {
        if (n % i == 0) return 0;
        }
        return 1;
        }


        Seive is kind of over-kill, in your case ( if you are not taking in to consideration your memory requirements ) because the range could be very very large 1000000 you might want to use some sort of bitmap to generate the Seive.



        here is a very loosely written Idea of how to generate and use Seive.



        char *seive;

        void generate_seive( int n )
        {
        seive = calloc( 1, n );
        if( !seive )
        {
        printf("E...");
        exit(0);
        }

        // Generate Seive
        for( int i = 2; i < n ; i ++)
        {
        if( seive[i] == 1 )
        continue;
        // Essentially mark all primes as 0 and
        // non-primes as 1's
        seive[i] = 0;
        for( int j = i + i ; j < n ; j += i )
        seive[j] = 1;
        }
        }

        int main()
        {
        generate_seive(100);

        // Iterating through the generated Seive
        // should do
        for( int i = 2; i < 100 ; i ++ )
        if( seive[i] == 0 )
        printf("%dn", i);
        return 0;
        }





        share|improve this answer












        There are some primitive ways like this one for instance, looping through the odd numbers and some more optimizations



        int isPrime ( int n )
        {
        if (n <= 1) return 0; // zero and one are not prime
        unsigned int i;
        for (i=2; i*i<=n; i++) {
        if (n % i == 0) return 0;
        }
        return 1;
        }


        Seive is kind of over-kill, in your case ( if you are not taking in to consideration your memory requirements ) because the range could be very very large 1000000 you might want to use some sort of bitmap to generate the Seive.



        here is a very loosely written Idea of how to generate and use Seive.



        char *seive;

        void generate_seive( int n )
        {
        seive = calloc( 1, n );
        if( !seive )
        {
        printf("E...");
        exit(0);
        }

        // Generate Seive
        for( int i = 2; i < n ; i ++)
        {
        if( seive[i] == 1 )
        continue;
        // Essentially mark all primes as 0 and
        // non-primes as 1's
        seive[i] = 0;
        for( int j = i + i ; j < n ; j += i )
        seive[j] = 1;
        }
        }

        int main()
        {
        generate_seive(100);

        // Iterating through the generated Seive
        // should do
        for( int i = 2; i < 100 ; i ++ )
        if( seive[i] == 0 )
        printf("%dn", i);
        return 0;
        }






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 8 at 9:33









        u__

        2,501828




        2,501828






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53204676%2fgetting-tle-in-hackerearth%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest




















































































            Popular posts from this blog

            鏡平學校

            ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

            Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?