gitkraken is missing important feature from gitk
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm a long time gitk user, and switching to gitkraken, I miss at least one important feature. I wonder if there's a way to do this with gitkraken?
In gitk, I can click the mouse on the commit/branch tree to see not only the file names but also the diff contents of that commit. Then I can simply press the up/down arrows to move through the tree and at each commit I see the diffs for THAT commit, (i.e, a single click of up/down).
In gitkraken, when I click on the branches graph, it shows me only the names of the files which changed, and I have to click only one of the files to see its diffs, but that obscures the branches graph. To move to a different commit, I have to kill that pane, and move the cursor, and repeat the tedious process.
Isn't there an easier way? For the moment, I run both gitkraken to do update operations easily, and also open gitk to easily pursue the history.
gitkraken gitk
asked Nov 8 at 11:19
Jim Newton
429
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm a long time gitk user, and switching to gitkraken, I miss at least one important feature. I wonder if there's a way to do this with gitkraken?
In gitk, I can click the mouse on the commit/branch tree to see not only the file names but also the diff contents of that commit. Then I can simply press the up/down arrows to move through the tree and at each commit I see the diffs for THAT commit, (i.e, a single click of up/down).
In gitkraken, when I click on the branches graph, it shows me only the names of the files which changed, and I have to click only one of the files to see its diffs, but that obscures the branches graph. To move to a different commit, I have to kill that pane, and move the cursor, and repeat the tedious process.
Isn't there an easier way? For the moment, I run both gitkraken to do update operations easily, and also open gitk to easily pursue the history.
gitkraken gitk
asked Nov 8 at 11:19
Jim Newton
429
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm a long time gitk user, and switching to gitkraken, I miss at least one important feature. I wonder if there's a way to do this with gitkraken?
In gitk, I can click the mouse on the commit/branch tree to see not only the file names but also the diff contents of that commit. Then I can simply press the up/down arrows to move through the tree and at each commit I see the diffs for THAT commit, (i.e, a single click of up/down).
In gitkraken, when I click on the branches graph, it shows me only the names of the files which changed, and I have to click only one of the files to see its diffs, but that obscures the branches graph. To move to a different commit, I have to kill that pane, and move the cursor, and repeat the tedious process.
Isn't there an easier way? For the moment, I run both gitkraken to do update operations easily, and also open gitk to easily pursue the history.
gitkraken gitk
asked Nov 8 at 11:19
Jim Newton
429
I'm a long time gitk user, and switching to gitkraken, I miss at least one important feature. I wonder if there's a way to do this with gitkraken?
In gitk, I can click the mouse on the commit/branch tree to see not only the file names but also the diff contents of that commit. Then I can simply press the up/down arrows to move through the tree and at each commit I see the diffs for THAT commit, (i.e, a single click of up/down).
In gitkraken, when I click on the branches graph, it shows me only the names of the files which changed, and I have to click only one of the files to see its diffs, but that obscures the branches graph. To move to a different commit, I have to kill that pane, and move the cursor, and repeat the tedious process.
Isn't there an easier way? For the moment, I run both gitkraken to do update operations easily, and also open gitk to easily pursue the history.
gitkraken gitk
gitkraken gitk
asked Nov 8 at 11:19
Jim Newton
429
asked Nov 8 at 11:19
Jim Newton
429
asked Nov 8 at 11:19
Jim Newton
429
asked Nov 8 at 11:19
Jim Newton
429
asked Nov 8 at 11:19
Jim Newton
429
429
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53206699%2fgitkraken-is-missing-important-feature-from-gitk%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
