Cosmosdb index precision for fixed value strings












0















I want to index over a field in a collection whose values can be only 4 characters long



{ "field": "abcd" }



Can I use an index precision of 4 like below to save on RU's without having any side effects?



"indexes": [
{
"kind": "Range",
"dataType": "String",
"precision": 4
},
]










share|improve this question



























    0















    I want to index over a field in a collection whose values can be only 4 characters long



    { "field": "abcd" }



    Can I use an index precision of 4 like below to save on RU's without having any side effects?



    "indexes": [
    {
    "kind": "Range",
    "dataType": "String",
    "precision": 4
    },
    ]










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      I want to index over a field in a collection whose values can be only 4 characters long



      { "field": "abcd" }



      Can I use an index precision of 4 like below to save on RU's without having any side effects?



      "indexes": [
      {
      "kind": "Range",
      "dataType": "String",
      "precision": 4
      },
      ]










      share|improve this question














      I want to index over a field in a collection whose values can be only 4 characters long



      { "field": "abcd" }



      Can I use an index precision of 4 like below to save on RU's without having any side effects?



      "indexes": [
      {
      "kind": "Range",
      "dataType": "String",
      "precision": 4
      },
      ]







      indexing azure-cosmosdb






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 20 '18 at 0:33









      tariq zafartariq zafar

      345214




      345214
























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          For Range indexes, the index term length will never exceed the actual string length. So,if all of your strings are 4 characters long, then this will not have any impact (neither positive or negative). You're better off, however, to set the precision to -1 so that we don't have to change your index policy in the future in case the length of the strings changes.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thanks for answering. Out of curiosity, will we have considerable savings in terms of RUs if we used smaller precision to save indices? Can you just give some figures?

            – tariq zafar
            Nov 20 '18 at 1:23











          • I am from the CosmosDB engineering team. The precision of the term does not have an impact on the RU cost per term. Roughly the RU cost corresponds to cost of writing the document (which depends on the size of the document) and the number of terms produced during analysis of the document. If you want to reduce the RU cost of your writes, you should exclude all paths that you don't need to index from your indexing policy.

            – Krishnan Sundaram
            Dec 9 '18 at 5:42





















          0














          Based on this official statement, the choice of the index precision might affect the performance of string range queries. Obviously, there is no specific statements about
          effect like hash type index. So,I suggest you do actual test based on the simulation data instead so that maybe you could find the truth.



          BTW, if you want to perform ORDER BY queries against your string properties, you must specify a precision of -1 for the corresponding paths.



          There are more documents about saving RUs for your reference.



          1.https://lbadri.wordpress.com/2018/04/07/is-azure-cosmos-db-really-expensive/



          2.https://medium.com/@thomasweiss_io/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-cosmos-dbs-request-units-92c68c62c938






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53384586%2fcosmosdb-index-precision-for-fixed-value-strings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            For Range indexes, the index term length will never exceed the actual string length. So,if all of your strings are 4 characters long, then this will not have any impact (neither positive or negative). You're better off, however, to set the precision to -1 so that we don't have to change your index policy in the future in case the length of the strings changes.






            share|improve this answer
























            • Thanks for answering. Out of curiosity, will we have considerable savings in terms of RUs if we used smaller precision to save indices? Can you just give some figures?

              – tariq zafar
              Nov 20 '18 at 1:23











            • I am from the CosmosDB engineering team. The precision of the term does not have an impact on the RU cost per term. Roughly the RU cost corresponds to cost of writing the document (which depends on the size of the document) and the number of terms produced during analysis of the document. If you want to reduce the RU cost of your writes, you should exclude all paths that you don't need to index from your indexing policy.

              – Krishnan Sundaram
              Dec 9 '18 at 5:42


















            1














            For Range indexes, the index term length will never exceed the actual string length. So,if all of your strings are 4 characters long, then this will not have any impact (neither positive or negative). You're better off, however, to set the precision to -1 so that we don't have to change your index policy in the future in case the length of the strings changes.






            share|improve this answer
























            • Thanks for answering. Out of curiosity, will we have considerable savings in terms of RUs if we used smaller precision to save indices? Can you just give some figures?

              – tariq zafar
              Nov 20 '18 at 1:23











            • I am from the CosmosDB engineering team. The precision of the term does not have an impact on the RU cost per term. Roughly the RU cost corresponds to cost of writing the document (which depends on the size of the document) and the number of terms produced during analysis of the document. If you want to reduce the RU cost of your writes, you should exclude all paths that you don't need to index from your indexing policy.

              – Krishnan Sundaram
              Dec 9 '18 at 5:42
















            1












            1








            1







            For Range indexes, the index term length will never exceed the actual string length. So,if all of your strings are 4 characters long, then this will not have any impact (neither positive or negative). You're better off, however, to set the precision to -1 so that we don't have to change your index policy in the future in case the length of the strings changes.






            share|improve this answer













            For Range indexes, the index term length will never exceed the actual string length. So,if all of your strings are 4 characters long, then this will not have any impact (neither positive or negative). You're better off, however, to set the precision to -1 so that we don't have to change your index policy in the future in case the length of the strings changes.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Nov 20 '18 at 1:15









            Samer BoshraSamer Boshra

            43924




            43924













            • Thanks for answering. Out of curiosity, will we have considerable savings in terms of RUs if we used smaller precision to save indices? Can you just give some figures?

              – tariq zafar
              Nov 20 '18 at 1:23











            • I am from the CosmosDB engineering team. The precision of the term does not have an impact on the RU cost per term. Roughly the RU cost corresponds to cost of writing the document (which depends on the size of the document) and the number of terms produced during analysis of the document. If you want to reduce the RU cost of your writes, you should exclude all paths that you don't need to index from your indexing policy.

              – Krishnan Sundaram
              Dec 9 '18 at 5:42





















            • Thanks for answering. Out of curiosity, will we have considerable savings in terms of RUs if we used smaller precision to save indices? Can you just give some figures?

              – tariq zafar
              Nov 20 '18 at 1:23











            • I am from the CosmosDB engineering team. The precision of the term does not have an impact on the RU cost per term. Roughly the RU cost corresponds to cost of writing the document (which depends on the size of the document) and the number of terms produced during analysis of the document. If you want to reduce the RU cost of your writes, you should exclude all paths that you don't need to index from your indexing policy.

              – Krishnan Sundaram
              Dec 9 '18 at 5:42



















            Thanks for answering. Out of curiosity, will we have considerable savings in terms of RUs if we used smaller precision to save indices? Can you just give some figures?

            – tariq zafar
            Nov 20 '18 at 1:23





            Thanks for answering. Out of curiosity, will we have considerable savings in terms of RUs if we used smaller precision to save indices? Can you just give some figures?

            – tariq zafar
            Nov 20 '18 at 1:23













            I am from the CosmosDB engineering team. The precision of the term does not have an impact on the RU cost per term. Roughly the RU cost corresponds to cost of writing the document (which depends on the size of the document) and the number of terms produced during analysis of the document. If you want to reduce the RU cost of your writes, you should exclude all paths that you don't need to index from your indexing policy.

            – Krishnan Sundaram
            Dec 9 '18 at 5:42







            I am from the CosmosDB engineering team. The precision of the term does not have an impact on the RU cost per term. Roughly the RU cost corresponds to cost of writing the document (which depends on the size of the document) and the number of terms produced during analysis of the document. If you want to reduce the RU cost of your writes, you should exclude all paths that you don't need to index from your indexing policy.

            – Krishnan Sundaram
            Dec 9 '18 at 5:42















            0














            Based on this official statement, the choice of the index precision might affect the performance of string range queries. Obviously, there is no specific statements about
            effect like hash type index. So,I suggest you do actual test based on the simulation data instead so that maybe you could find the truth.



            BTW, if you want to perform ORDER BY queries against your string properties, you must specify a precision of -1 for the corresponding paths.



            There are more documents about saving RUs for your reference.



            1.https://lbadri.wordpress.com/2018/04/07/is-azure-cosmos-db-really-expensive/



            2.https://medium.com/@thomasweiss_io/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-cosmos-dbs-request-units-92c68c62c938






            share|improve this answer




























              0














              Based on this official statement, the choice of the index precision might affect the performance of string range queries. Obviously, there is no specific statements about
              effect like hash type index. So,I suggest you do actual test based on the simulation data instead so that maybe you could find the truth.



              BTW, if you want to perform ORDER BY queries against your string properties, you must specify a precision of -1 for the corresponding paths.



              There are more documents about saving RUs for your reference.



              1.https://lbadri.wordpress.com/2018/04/07/is-azure-cosmos-db-really-expensive/



              2.https://medium.com/@thomasweiss_io/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-cosmos-dbs-request-units-92c68c62c938






              share|improve this answer


























                0












                0








                0







                Based on this official statement, the choice of the index precision might affect the performance of string range queries. Obviously, there is no specific statements about
                effect like hash type index. So,I suggest you do actual test based on the simulation data instead so that maybe you could find the truth.



                BTW, if you want to perform ORDER BY queries against your string properties, you must specify a precision of -1 for the corresponding paths.



                There are more documents about saving RUs for your reference.



                1.https://lbadri.wordpress.com/2018/04/07/is-azure-cosmos-db-really-expensive/



                2.https://medium.com/@thomasweiss_io/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-cosmos-dbs-request-units-92c68c62c938






                share|improve this answer













                Based on this official statement, the choice of the index precision might affect the performance of string range queries. Obviously, there is no specific statements about
                effect like hash type index. So,I suggest you do actual test based on the simulation data instead so that maybe you could find the truth.



                BTW, if you want to perform ORDER BY queries against your string properties, you must specify a precision of -1 for the corresponding paths.



                There are more documents about saving RUs for your reference.



                1.https://lbadri.wordpress.com/2018/04/07/is-azure-cosmos-db-really-expensive/



                2.https://medium.com/@thomasweiss_io/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-cosmos-dbs-request-units-92c68c62c938







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 20 '18 at 2:06









                Jay GongJay Gong

                8,9001512




                8,9001512






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53384586%2fcosmosdb-index-precision-for-fixed-value-strings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    鏡平學校

                    ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

                    Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?