Program to static-link VB6 executable to it's dependencies (like PowerRap)





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







1















I read something about PowerWrap which is supposed to allow you to static-link a vb6 .exe to it's dependent files (.OCX, etc.)



However, the website for the product appears to be just a squatter.



Anyone know anything more about the product or something similar that's still being supported?










share|improve this question























  • These tend to be pretty flaky, often ending by leaving corrupted entries in the registry and breaking any other applications that use the same components. They do not statically link anything, but instead fiddle around a lot at runtime dumping resources out as files and self-registering them. "Installation package authors are strongly advised against using self registration." msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa371608(VS.85).aspx

    – Bob77
    Jun 11 '11 at 14:55






  • 1





    I advise you to try out registry-free COM instead, maybe with Make My Manifest. This turns your app into a set of related files that can simply be copied onto the target machine with no install, no registering. It's as close to a static linker as you'll get with VB6.

    – MarkJ
    Jun 12 '11 at 12:44













  • Make My Manifest is here mmm4vb6.atom5.com

    – MarkJ
    Jun 12 '11 at 14:24


















1















I read something about PowerWrap which is supposed to allow you to static-link a vb6 .exe to it's dependent files (.OCX, etc.)



However, the website for the product appears to be just a squatter.



Anyone know anything more about the product or something similar that's still being supported?










share|improve this question























  • These tend to be pretty flaky, often ending by leaving corrupted entries in the registry and breaking any other applications that use the same components. They do not statically link anything, but instead fiddle around a lot at runtime dumping resources out as files and self-registering them. "Installation package authors are strongly advised against using self registration." msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa371608(VS.85).aspx

    – Bob77
    Jun 11 '11 at 14:55






  • 1





    I advise you to try out registry-free COM instead, maybe with Make My Manifest. This turns your app into a set of related files that can simply be copied onto the target machine with no install, no registering. It's as close to a static linker as you'll get with VB6.

    – MarkJ
    Jun 12 '11 at 12:44













  • Make My Manifest is here mmm4vb6.atom5.com

    – MarkJ
    Jun 12 '11 at 14:24














1












1








1








I read something about PowerWrap which is supposed to allow you to static-link a vb6 .exe to it's dependent files (.OCX, etc.)



However, the website for the product appears to be just a squatter.



Anyone know anything more about the product or something similar that's still being supported?










share|improve this question














I read something about PowerWrap which is supposed to allow you to static-link a vb6 .exe to it's dependent files (.OCX, etc.)



However, the website for the product appears to be just a squatter.



Anyone know anything more about the product or something similar that's still being supported?







vb6 static-linking






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jun 11 '11 at 2:09









Clay NicholsClay Nichols

6,0302291153




6,0302291153













  • These tend to be pretty flaky, often ending by leaving corrupted entries in the registry and breaking any other applications that use the same components. They do not statically link anything, but instead fiddle around a lot at runtime dumping resources out as files and self-registering them. "Installation package authors are strongly advised against using self registration." msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa371608(VS.85).aspx

    – Bob77
    Jun 11 '11 at 14:55






  • 1





    I advise you to try out registry-free COM instead, maybe with Make My Manifest. This turns your app into a set of related files that can simply be copied onto the target machine with no install, no registering. It's as close to a static linker as you'll get with VB6.

    – MarkJ
    Jun 12 '11 at 12:44













  • Make My Manifest is here mmm4vb6.atom5.com

    – MarkJ
    Jun 12 '11 at 14:24



















  • These tend to be pretty flaky, often ending by leaving corrupted entries in the registry and breaking any other applications that use the same components. They do not statically link anything, but instead fiddle around a lot at runtime dumping resources out as files and self-registering them. "Installation package authors are strongly advised against using self registration." msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa371608(VS.85).aspx

    – Bob77
    Jun 11 '11 at 14:55






  • 1





    I advise you to try out registry-free COM instead, maybe with Make My Manifest. This turns your app into a set of related files that can simply be copied onto the target machine with no install, no registering. It's as close to a static linker as you'll get with VB6.

    – MarkJ
    Jun 12 '11 at 12:44













  • Make My Manifest is here mmm4vb6.atom5.com

    – MarkJ
    Jun 12 '11 at 14:24

















These tend to be pretty flaky, often ending by leaving corrupted entries in the registry and breaking any other applications that use the same components. They do not statically link anything, but instead fiddle around a lot at runtime dumping resources out as files and self-registering them. "Installation package authors are strongly advised against using self registration." msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa371608(VS.85).aspx

– Bob77
Jun 11 '11 at 14:55





These tend to be pretty flaky, often ending by leaving corrupted entries in the registry and breaking any other applications that use the same components. They do not statically link anything, but instead fiddle around a lot at runtime dumping resources out as files and self-registering them. "Installation package authors are strongly advised against using self registration." msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa371608(VS.85).aspx

– Bob77
Jun 11 '11 at 14:55




1




1





I advise you to try out registry-free COM instead, maybe with Make My Manifest. This turns your app into a set of related files that can simply be copied onto the target machine with no install, no registering. It's as close to a static linker as you'll get with VB6.

– MarkJ
Jun 12 '11 at 12:44







I advise you to try out registry-free COM instead, maybe with Make My Manifest. This turns your app into a set of related files that can simply be copied onto the target machine with no install, no registering. It's as close to a static linker as you'll get with VB6.

– MarkJ
Jun 12 '11 at 12:44















Make My Manifest is here mmm4vb6.atom5.com

– MarkJ
Jun 12 '11 at 14:24





Make My Manifest is here mmm4vb6.atom5.com

– MarkJ
Jun 12 '11 at 14:24












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














I discovered another solution called UMM (Universal Make My Manifest). You give it a list of files and some options, and out comes a manifest ready-to-go. I've been using it for a half-million line VB project with dozens of ActiveX modules, and it works well. Requires tlbinf32.dll.






share|improve this answer


























  • Man, that name is epic.

    – Andrew Barber
    Oct 2 '12 at 13:45











  • Side-by-side execution with a manifest seems like the closest you can get to static linking with VB6

    – DaveInCaz
    Jul 29 '16 at 18:27












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f6313635%2fprogram-to-static-link-vb6-executable-to-its-dependencies-like-powerrap%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














I discovered another solution called UMM (Universal Make My Manifest). You give it a list of files and some options, and out comes a manifest ready-to-go. I've been using it for a half-million line VB project with dozens of ActiveX modules, and it works well. Requires tlbinf32.dll.






share|improve this answer


























  • Man, that name is epic.

    – Andrew Barber
    Oct 2 '12 at 13:45











  • Side-by-side execution with a manifest seems like the closest you can get to static linking with VB6

    – DaveInCaz
    Jul 29 '16 at 18:27
















1














I discovered another solution called UMM (Universal Make My Manifest). You give it a list of files and some options, and out comes a manifest ready-to-go. I've been using it for a half-million line VB project with dozens of ActiveX modules, and it works well. Requires tlbinf32.dll.






share|improve this answer


























  • Man, that name is epic.

    – Andrew Barber
    Oct 2 '12 at 13:45











  • Side-by-side execution with a manifest seems like the closest you can get to static linking with VB6

    – DaveInCaz
    Jul 29 '16 at 18:27














1












1








1







I discovered another solution called UMM (Universal Make My Manifest). You give it a list of files and some options, and out comes a manifest ready-to-go. I've been using it for a half-million line VB project with dozens of ActiveX modules, and it works well. Requires tlbinf32.dll.






share|improve this answer















I discovered another solution called UMM (Universal Make My Manifest). You give it a list of files and some options, and out comes a manifest ready-to-go. I've been using it for a half-million line VB project with dozens of ActiveX modules, and it works well. Requires tlbinf32.dll.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 21 '18 at 21:04









DaveInCaz

3,42732042




3,42732042










answered Aug 24 '12 at 19:00









James KaraganisJames Karaganis

111




111













  • Man, that name is epic.

    – Andrew Barber
    Oct 2 '12 at 13:45











  • Side-by-side execution with a manifest seems like the closest you can get to static linking with VB6

    – DaveInCaz
    Jul 29 '16 at 18:27



















  • Man, that name is epic.

    – Andrew Barber
    Oct 2 '12 at 13:45











  • Side-by-side execution with a manifest seems like the closest you can get to static linking with VB6

    – DaveInCaz
    Jul 29 '16 at 18:27

















Man, that name is epic.

– Andrew Barber
Oct 2 '12 at 13:45





Man, that name is epic.

– Andrew Barber
Oct 2 '12 at 13:45













Side-by-side execution with a manifest seems like the closest you can get to static linking with VB6

– DaveInCaz
Jul 29 '16 at 18:27





Side-by-side execution with a manifest seems like the closest you can get to static linking with VB6

– DaveInCaz
Jul 29 '16 at 18:27




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f6313635%2fprogram-to-static-link-vb6-executable-to-its-dependencies-like-powerrap%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

鏡平學校

ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?