Should the state of a multi-container docker application be persisted by using non-binary files identified by...












0















I am currently researching best practices to persist data and make it efficiently available in a multi-container docker application.



Most docker applications use databases to persist data but it makes your application dependent on the database-engines version so if a new feature is needed migrations have to take place.
Migrations take a lot of time to plan, slow development, are prone to errors and could (worst case) leave the state completely broken.



To bypass this problem I have often asked myself why not just create a volume and read/write all data from/to a volume in a UUID/SESSION-ID.JSON manner?



This way each container stays stateless/ephemeral and can read the state from the volume at any time which makes it easily scalable and since there can only be one UUID/SESSION-ID the problem of simultaneous writes gets resolved implicitly.



What would be the problem with such an application-architecture?










share|improve this question





























    0















    I am currently researching best practices to persist data and make it efficiently available in a multi-container docker application.



    Most docker applications use databases to persist data but it makes your application dependent on the database-engines version so if a new feature is needed migrations have to take place.
    Migrations take a lot of time to plan, slow development, are prone to errors and could (worst case) leave the state completely broken.



    To bypass this problem I have often asked myself why not just create a volume and read/write all data from/to a volume in a UUID/SESSION-ID.JSON manner?



    This way each container stays stateless/ephemeral and can read the state from the volume at any time which makes it easily scalable and since there can only be one UUID/SESSION-ID the problem of simultaneous writes gets resolved implicitly.



    What would be the problem with such an application-architecture?










    share|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0








      I am currently researching best practices to persist data and make it efficiently available in a multi-container docker application.



      Most docker applications use databases to persist data but it makes your application dependent on the database-engines version so if a new feature is needed migrations have to take place.
      Migrations take a lot of time to plan, slow development, are prone to errors and could (worst case) leave the state completely broken.



      To bypass this problem I have often asked myself why not just create a volume and read/write all data from/to a volume in a UUID/SESSION-ID.JSON manner?



      This way each container stays stateless/ephemeral and can read the state from the volume at any time which makes it easily scalable and since there can only be one UUID/SESSION-ID the problem of simultaneous writes gets resolved implicitly.



      What would be the problem with such an application-architecture?










      share|improve this question
















      I am currently researching best practices to persist data and make it efficiently available in a multi-container docker application.



      Most docker applications use databases to persist data but it makes your application dependent on the database-engines version so if a new feature is needed migrations have to take place.
      Migrations take a lot of time to plan, slow development, are prone to errors and could (worst case) leave the state completely broken.



      To bypass this problem I have often asked myself why not just create a volume and read/write all data from/to a volume in a UUID/SESSION-ID.JSON manner?



      This way each container stays stateless/ephemeral and can read the state from the volume at any time which makes it easily scalable and since there can only be one UUID/SESSION-ID the problem of simultaneous writes gets resolved implicitly.



      What would be the problem with such an application-architecture?







      docker architecture docker-volume stateless stateless-session






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 19 '18 at 12:47







      Thodi

















      asked Nov 19 '18 at 9:23









      ThodiThodi

      148113




      148113
























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53371570%2fshould-the-state-of-a-multi-container-docker-application-be-persisted-by-using-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53371570%2fshould-the-state-of-a-multi-container-docker-application-be-persisted-by-using-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Guess what letter conforming each word

          Port of Spain

          Run scheduled task as local user group (not BUILTIN)