Chord exceptions in City of New Orleans











up vote
6
down vote

favorite
2












Here are the first few chords of "City of New Orleans" as performed by Arlo Guthrie:



F# C# F# D#m B F#



F# C# F# D#m B F#



D#m A#m C# G#



If I lay out the chords in a roman numeral chart, starting at F#, I get:



| I  | ii  | iii | IV | V  | vi  | vii⁰ |
|----+-----+-----+----+----+-----+------|
| F# | G#m | A#m | B | C# | D#m | Fdim |


So, in the song, he plays a G#. However, the chart predicts a G#m, which is an exception to the chart that sounds good.



Where can I read about these "exceptions"?



Thanks!










share|improve this question







New contributor




dharmatech is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2




    This is a beautiful example of a clear question.
    – Wayne Conrad
    2 days ago















up vote
6
down vote

favorite
2












Here are the first few chords of "City of New Orleans" as performed by Arlo Guthrie:



F# C# F# D#m B F#



F# C# F# D#m B F#



D#m A#m C# G#



If I lay out the chords in a roman numeral chart, starting at F#, I get:



| I  | ii  | iii | IV | V  | vi  | vii⁰ |
|----+-----+-----+----+----+-----+------|
| F# | G#m | A#m | B | C# | D#m | Fdim |


So, in the song, he plays a G#. However, the chart predicts a G#m, which is an exception to the chart that sounds good.



Where can I read about these "exceptions"?



Thanks!










share|improve this question







New contributor




dharmatech is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2




    This is a beautiful example of a clear question.
    – Wayne Conrad
    2 days ago













up vote
6
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
6
down vote

favorite
2






2





Here are the first few chords of "City of New Orleans" as performed by Arlo Guthrie:



F# C# F# D#m B F#



F# C# F# D#m B F#



D#m A#m C# G#



If I lay out the chords in a roman numeral chart, starting at F#, I get:



| I  | ii  | iii | IV | V  | vi  | vii⁰ |
|----+-----+-----+----+----+-----+------|
| F# | G#m | A#m | B | C# | D#m | Fdim |


So, in the song, he plays a G#. However, the chart predicts a G#m, which is an exception to the chart that sounds good.



Where can I read about these "exceptions"?



Thanks!










share|improve this question







New contributor




dharmatech is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Here are the first few chords of "City of New Orleans" as performed by Arlo Guthrie:



F# C# F# D#m B F#



F# C# F# D#m B F#



D#m A#m C# G#



If I lay out the chords in a roman numeral chart, starting at F#, I get:



| I  | ii  | iii | IV | V  | vi  | vii⁰ |
|----+-----+-----+----+----+-----+------|
| F# | G#m | A#m | B | C# | D#m | Fdim |


So, in the song, he plays a G#. However, the chart predicts a G#m, which is an exception to the chart that sounds good.



Where can I read about these "exceptions"?



Thanks!







chord-theory chord-progressions roman-numerals






share|improve this question







New contributor




dharmatech is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




dharmatech is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




dharmatech is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Nov 8 at 1:51









dharmatech

1333




1333




New contributor




dharmatech is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





dharmatech is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






dharmatech is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 2




    This is a beautiful example of a clear question.
    – Wayne Conrad
    2 days ago














  • 2




    This is a beautiful example of a clear question.
    – Wayne Conrad
    2 days ago








2




2




This is a beautiful example of a clear question.
– Wayne Conrad
2 days ago




This is a beautiful example of a clear question.
– Wayne Conrad
2 days ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
14
down vote



accepted










The chords you've listed in your table are what we call the diatonic triads of a key. "Diatonic" basically just means "within the key," so the diatonic triads are what are created when we only use the pitches in a key's key signature.



(Quick note related to key signatures: your vii° chord will actually be E♯°, not , because E♯ is the seventh scale degree in F♯ major. For more on this concept, see Why do notes have multiple names?)



The opposite of diatonic is chromatic. Put another way, a chromatic pitch is a pitch that is not in the key's key signature. The G♯-major chord in question has B♯ as its chordal third, which is not in the key signature of F♯ (that would be B♮).



So whenever we have a chromatic chord like this, we want to try and understand how it functions. In many cases, the appearance of an unexpected major triad can be understood as being a temporary V (or "dominant") of another chord. In this case, the G♯-major chord can best be understood as a temporary V of the C♯ that comes before it. We say that this G♯-major chord is V/V (read "five of five") because it is V of C♯, which is itself V of the tonic F♯. We also call this chord a secondary dominant or applied dominant.



Typically the secondary dominant chord appears before its resolution; in other words, it's more normal for the G♯-major chord to resolve to C♯ major. But sometimes we have the applied dominant come after the temporary tonic, too. (It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves; it might go back to C♯!)



As for another "exception," if you ever encounter a minor chord where you're not expecting it, it's often a result of mode mixture (some use the term "borrowed chords"). (See How do I correctly borrow chords from one key to another? for one possible discussion of mode mixture. You also might enjoy What are the different ways of adding non-diatonic chords?)



TL;DR: That G♯ chord is understood as a temporary V/C♯. Since C♯ is itself V of F♯, we label this chord V/V.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2




    If you've ever listened to the Foo Fighters, you've heard a major II-- Dave Grohl can't go five minutes w/o using one-- and I love it every time.
    – Alexander Nied
    2 days ago










  • @AlexanderNied Hmm... What's an example song of theirs which illustrates this?
    – dharmatech
    2 days ago






  • 1




    So, I actually struggled to find a place where it is clear it's what he's doing- frequently what might be a II is more aptly described as a IV in what would otherwise be a minor key but flirting in the relative major space. The two clearest examples I could find quickly were in the choruses of Walking After You on Color and the Shape and Another Round on In Your Honor. Note in neither place is it being used as an applied dominant, so the usage may be different from your song- in the former the II leads to the IV and in the latter to the vi.
    – Alexander Nied
    2 days ago






  • 2




    I'll add that V-ii (C#-G#m) is forbidden in common practice period harmony and a rare chord progression in general from my experience. C#-G# actually makes more sense to me in an F# major context.
    – Dekkadeci
    2 days ago






  • 1




    "It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves ... ." From my recollection (supported by the chord annotations I see online), it moves to D♯m and repeats the progression to A♯m and C♯, but this time resolves via C♯7 to F♯.
    – David K
    2 days ago


















up vote
2
down vote













The Ⅱ chord can serve mostly two roles:





  • A secondary dominant, as said by Richard. This would be clearly the intepretation to go if the two last chords were turned around:



    ⅵ | ⅲ | Ⅴ/Ⅴ | Ⅴ


    I wouldn't interpret the G♯ as a secondary dominant here though, if it doesn't really depend on the Ⅴ chord.



  • As a borrowed chord from the Lydian mode. The F♯-Lydian scale is F♯-G♯-A♯-B♯-C♯-D♯-E♯-. I does contain all the third line as diatonic chords. Or you might say that this entire section modulates to d♯-Dorian.







share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    You've fallen into the common trap of seeing a scale, and the triads that can be formed from it, as a restriction.



    Yes, there is a set of chords that can be constructed from the notes of a scale. But that's no more than a mildly interesting fact. A song in a given key will use some of the diatonic chords a lot, others not so often. And other, non-diatonic chords will also very likely appear. The diatonic, scale-derived chords are not a restriction, not the chords that you MAY use. They're just the diatonic chords.



    For instance, consider the C major key. C, Dm, F, G, Am will probably be used a lot. But D7, C#dim, Bb, Fm are more likely to be used than the (diatonic) B dim. And, if you're playing blues-based styles, C7, F7 and G7 are the basic chords, two of which are non-diatonic!



    THE SCALE IS A FRAMEWORK, NOT A RESTRICTION.



    Once you absorb this, a lot of the 'borrowing' thing becomes unnecessary. Where a chromatic chord IS used as a gateway to a modulation, there's sense in calling it borrowed. An Fm chord in C major MIGHT be a pre-echo of a Fm7, Bb7, Eb modulation to Eb. So calling it 'borrowed from Eb major' is useful. But C C7, F, Fm, G7, C at the end of 'When the Saints' doesn't go anywhere. Just let C7 and Fm be chromatic chords. 'Borrowing' them doesn't help.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "240"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      dharmatech is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f76274%2fchord-exceptions-in-city-of-new-orleans%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest
































      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      14
      down vote



      accepted










      The chords you've listed in your table are what we call the diatonic triads of a key. "Diatonic" basically just means "within the key," so the diatonic triads are what are created when we only use the pitches in a key's key signature.



      (Quick note related to key signatures: your vii° chord will actually be E♯°, not , because E♯ is the seventh scale degree in F♯ major. For more on this concept, see Why do notes have multiple names?)



      The opposite of diatonic is chromatic. Put another way, a chromatic pitch is a pitch that is not in the key's key signature. The G♯-major chord in question has B♯ as its chordal third, which is not in the key signature of F♯ (that would be B♮).



      So whenever we have a chromatic chord like this, we want to try and understand how it functions. In many cases, the appearance of an unexpected major triad can be understood as being a temporary V (or "dominant") of another chord. In this case, the G♯-major chord can best be understood as a temporary V of the C♯ that comes before it. We say that this G♯-major chord is V/V (read "five of five") because it is V of C♯, which is itself V of the tonic F♯. We also call this chord a secondary dominant or applied dominant.



      Typically the secondary dominant chord appears before its resolution; in other words, it's more normal for the G♯-major chord to resolve to C♯ major. But sometimes we have the applied dominant come after the temporary tonic, too. (It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves; it might go back to C♯!)



      As for another "exception," if you ever encounter a minor chord where you're not expecting it, it's often a result of mode mixture (some use the term "borrowed chords"). (See How do I correctly borrow chords from one key to another? for one possible discussion of mode mixture. You also might enjoy What are the different ways of adding non-diatonic chords?)



      TL;DR: That G♯ chord is understood as a temporary V/C♯. Since C♯ is itself V of F♯, we label this chord V/V.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 2




        If you've ever listened to the Foo Fighters, you've heard a major II-- Dave Grohl can't go five minutes w/o using one-- and I love it every time.
        – Alexander Nied
        2 days ago










      • @AlexanderNied Hmm... What's an example song of theirs which illustrates this?
        – dharmatech
        2 days ago






      • 1




        So, I actually struggled to find a place where it is clear it's what he's doing- frequently what might be a II is more aptly described as a IV in what would otherwise be a minor key but flirting in the relative major space. The two clearest examples I could find quickly were in the choruses of Walking After You on Color and the Shape and Another Round on In Your Honor. Note in neither place is it being used as an applied dominant, so the usage may be different from your song- in the former the II leads to the IV and in the latter to the vi.
        – Alexander Nied
        2 days ago






      • 2




        I'll add that V-ii (C#-G#m) is forbidden in common practice period harmony and a rare chord progression in general from my experience. C#-G# actually makes more sense to me in an F# major context.
        – Dekkadeci
        2 days ago






      • 1




        "It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves ... ." From my recollection (supported by the chord annotations I see online), it moves to D♯m and repeats the progression to A♯m and C♯, but this time resolves via C♯7 to F♯.
        – David K
        2 days ago















      up vote
      14
      down vote



      accepted










      The chords you've listed in your table are what we call the diatonic triads of a key. "Diatonic" basically just means "within the key," so the diatonic triads are what are created when we only use the pitches in a key's key signature.



      (Quick note related to key signatures: your vii° chord will actually be E♯°, not , because E♯ is the seventh scale degree in F♯ major. For more on this concept, see Why do notes have multiple names?)



      The opposite of diatonic is chromatic. Put another way, a chromatic pitch is a pitch that is not in the key's key signature. The G♯-major chord in question has B♯ as its chordal third, which is not in the key signature of F♯ (that would be B♮).



      So whenever we have a chromatic chord like this, we want to try and understand how it functions. In many cases, the appearance of an unexpected major triad can be understood as being a temporary V (or "dominant") of another chord. In this case, the G♯-major chord can best be understood as a temporary V of the C♯ that comes before it. We say that this G♯-major chord is V/V (read "five of five") because it is V of C♯, which is itself V of the tonic F♯. We also call this chord a secondary dominant or applied dominant.



      Typically the secondary dominant chord appears before its resolution; in other words, it's more normal for the G♯-major chord to resolve to C♯ major. But sometimes we have the applied dominant come after the temporary tonic, too. (It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves; it might go back to C♯!)



      As for another "exception," if you ever encounter a minor chord where you're not expecting it, it's often a result of mode mixture (some use the term "borrowed chords"). (See How do I correctly borrow chords from one key to another? for one possible discussion of mode mixture. You also might enjoy What are the different ways of adding non-diatonic chords?)



      TL;DR: That G♯ chord is understood as a temporary V/C♯. Since C♯ is itself V of F♯, we label this chord V/V.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 2




        If you've ever listened to the Foo Fighters, you've heard a major II-- Dave Grohl can't go five minutes w/o using one-- and I love it every time.
        – Alexander Nied
        2 days ago










      • @AlexanderNied Hmm... What's an example song of theirs which illustrates this?
        – dharmatech
        2 days ago






      • 1




        So, I actually struggled to find a place where it is clear it's what he's doing- frequently what might be a II is more aptly described as a IV in what would otherwise be a minor key but flirting in the relative major space. The two clearest examples I could find quickly were in the choruses of Walking After You on Color and the Shape and Another Round on In Your Honor. Note in neither place is it being used as an applied dominant, so the usage may be different from your song- in the former the II leads to the IV and in the latter to the vi.
        – Alexander Nied
        2 days ago






      • 2




        I'll add that V-ii (C#-G#m) is forbidden in common practice period harmony and a rare chord progression in general from my experience. C#-G# actually makes more sense to me in an F# major context.
        – Dekkadeci
        2 days ago






      • 1




        "It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves ... ." From my recollection (supported by the chord annotations I see online), it moves to D♯m and repeats the progression to A♯m and C♯, but this time resolves via C♯7 to F♯.
        – David K
        2 days ago













      up vote
      14
      down vote



      accepted







      up vote
      14
      down vote



      accepted






      The chords you've listed in your table are what we call the diatonic triads of a key. "Diatonic" basically just means "within the key," so the diatonic triads are what are created when we only use the pitches in a key's key signature.



      (Quick note related to key signatures: your vii° chord will actually be E♯°, not , because E♯ is the seventh scale degree in F♯ major. For more on this concept, see Why do notes have multiple names?)



      The opposite of diatonic is chromatic. Put another way, a chromatic pitch is a pitch that is not in the key's key signature. The G♯-major chord in question has B♯ as its chordal third, which is not in the key signature of F♯ (that would be B♮).



      So whenever we have a chromatic chord like this, we want to try and understand how it functions. In many cases, the appearance of an unexpected major triad can be understood as being a temporary V (or "dominant") of another chord. In this case, the G♯-major chord can best be understood as a temporary V of the C♯ that comes before it. We say that this G♯-major chord is V/V (read "five of five") because it is V of C♯, which is itself V of the tonic F♯. We also call this chord a secondary dominant or applied dominant.



      Typically the secondary dominant chord appears before its resolution; in other words, it's more normal for the G♯-major chord to resolve to C♯ major. But sometimes we have the applied dominant come after the temporary tonic, too. (It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves; it might go back to C♯!)



      As for another "exception," if you ever encounter a minor chord where you're not expecting it, it's often a result of mode mixture (some use the term "borrowed chords"). (See How do I correctly borrow chords from one key to another? for one possible discussion of mode mixture. You also might enjoy What are the different ways of adding non-diatonic chords?)



      TL;DR: That G♯ chord is understood as a temporary V/C♯. Since C♯ is itself V of F♯, we label this chord V/V.






      share|improve this answer














      The chords you've listed in your table are what we call the diatonic triads of a key. "Diatonic" basically just means "within the key," so the diatonic triads are what are created when we only use the pitches in a key's key signature.



      (Quick note related to key signatures: your vii° chord will actually be E♯°, not , because E♯ is the seventh scale degree in F♯ major. For more on this concept, see Why do notes have multiple names?)



      The opposite of diatonic is chromatic. Put another way, a chromatic pitch is a pitch that is not in the key's key signature. The G♯-major chord in question has B♯ as its chordal third, which is not in the key signature of F♯ (that would be B♮).



      So whenever we have a chromatic chord like this, we want to try and understand how it functions. In many cases, the appearance of an unexpected major triad can be understood as being a temporary V (or "dominant") of another chord. In this case, the G♯-major chord can best be understood as a temporary V of the C♯ that comes before it. We say that this G♯-major chord is V/V (read "five of five") because it is V of C♯, which is itself V of the tonic F♯. We also call this chord a secondary dominant or applied dominant.



      Typically the secondary dominant chord appears before its resolution; in other words, it's more normal for the G♯-major chord to resolve to C♯ major. But sometimes we have the applied dominant come after the temporary tonic, too. (It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves; it might go back to C♯!)



      As for another "exception," if you ever encounter a minor chord where you're not expecting it, it's often a result of mode mixture (some use the term "borrowed chords"). (See How do I correctly borrow chords from one key to another? for one possible discussion of mode mixture. You also might enjoy What are the different ways of adding non-diatonic chords?)



      TL;DR: That G♯ chord is understood as a temporary V/C♯. Since C♯ is itself V of F♯, we label this chord V/V.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 2 days ago

























      answered 2 days ago









      Richard

      34.9k677148




      34.9k677148








      • 2




        If you've ever listened to the Foo Fighters, you've heard a major II-- Dave Grohl can't go five minutes w/o using one-- and I love it every time.
        – Alexander Nied
        2 days ago










      • @AlexanderNied Hmm... What's an example song of theirs which illustrates this?
        – dharmatech
        2 days ago






      • 1




        So, I actually struggled to find a place where it is clear it's what he's doing- frequently what might be a II is more aptly described as a IV in what would otherwise be a minor key but flirting in the relative major space. The two clearest examples I could find quickly were in the choruses of Walking After You on Color and the Shape and Another Round on In Your Honor. Note in neither place is it being used as an applied dominant, so the usage may be different from your song- in the former the II leads to the IV and in the latter to the vi.
        – Alexander Nied
        2 days ago






      • 2




        I'll add that V-ii (C#-G#m) is forbidden in common practice period harmony and a rare chord progression in general from my experience. C#-G# actually makes more sense to me in an F# major context.
        – Dekkadeci
        2 days ago






      • 1




        "It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves ... ." From my recollection (supported by the chord annotations I see online), it moves to D♯m and repeats the progression to A♯m and C♯, but this time resolves via C♯7 to F♯.
        – David K
        2 days ago














      • 2




        If you've ever listened to the Foo Fighters, you've heard a major II-- Dave Grohl can't go five minutes w/o using one-- and I love it every time.
        – Alexander Nied
        2 days ago










      • @AlexanderNied Hmm... What's an example song of theirs which illustrates this?
        – dharmatech
        2 days ago






      • 1




        So, I actually struggled to find a place where it is clear it's what he's doing- frequently what might be a II is more aptly described as a IV in what would otherwise be a minor key but flirting in the relative major space. The two clearest examples I could find quickly were in the choruses of Walking After You on Color and the Shape and Another Round on In Your Honor. Note in neither place is it being used as an applied dominant, so the usage may be different from your song- in the former the II leads to the IV and in the latter to the vi.
        – Alexander Nied
        2 days ago






      • 2




        I'll add that V-ii (C#-G#m) is forbidden in common practice period harmony and a rare chord progression in general from my experience. C#-G# actually makes more sense to me in an F# major context.
        – Dekkadeci
        2 days ago






      • 1




        "It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves ... ." From my recollection (supported by the chord annotations I see online), it moves to D♯m and repeats the progression to A♯m and C♯, but this time resolves via C♯7 to F♯.
        – David K
        2 days ago








      2




      2




      If you've ever listened to the Foo Fighters, you've heard a major II-- Dave Grohl can't go five minutes w/o using one-- and I love it every time.
      – Alexander Nied
      2 days ago




      If you've ever listened to the Foo Fighters, you've heard a major II-- Dave Grohl can't go five minutes w/o using one-- and I love it every time.
      – Alexander Nied
      2 days ago












      @AlexanderNied Hmm... What's an example song of theirs which illustrates this?
      – dharmatech
      2 days ago




      @AlexanderNied Hmm... What's an example song of theirs which illustrates this?
      – dharmatech
      2 days ago




      1




      1




      So, I actually struggled to find a place where it is clear it's what he's doing- frequently what might be a II is more aptly described as a IV in what would otherwise be a minor key but flirting in the relative major space. The two clearest examples I could find quickly were in the choruses of Walking After You on Color and the Shape and Another Round on In Your Honor. Note in neither place is it being used as an applied dominant, so the usage may be different from your song- in the former the II leads to the IV and in the latter to the vi.
      – Alexander Nied
      2 days ago




      So, I actually struggled to find a place where it is clear it's what he's doing- frequently what might be a II is more aptly described as a IV in what would otherwise be a minor key but flirting in the relative major space. The two clearest examples I could find quickly were in the choruses of Walking After You on Color and the Shape and Another Round on In Your Honor. Note in neither place is it being used as an applied dominant, so the usage may be different from your song- in the former the II leads to the IV and in the latter to the vi.
      – Alexander Nied
      2 days ago




      2




      2




      I'll add that V-ii (C#-G#m) is forbidden in common practice period harmony and a rare chord progression in general from my experience. C#-G# actually makes more sense to me in an F# major context.
      – Dekkadeci
      2 days ago




      I'll add that V-ii (C#-G#m) is forbidden in common practice period harmony and a rare chord progression in general from my experience. C#-G# actually makes more sense to me in an F# major context.
      – Dekkadeci
      2 days ago




      1




      1




      "It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves ... ." From my recollection (supported by the chord annotations I see online), it moves to D♯m and repeats the progression to A♯m and C♯, but this time resolves via C♯7 to F♯.
      – David K
      2 days ago




      "It's unclear to me where this G♯ moves ... ." From my recollection (supported by the chord annotations I see online), it moves to D♯m and repeats the progression to A♯m and C♯, but this time resolves via C♯7 to F♯.
      – David K
      2 days ago










      up vote
      2
      down vote













      The Ⅱ chord can serve mostly two roles:





      • A secondary dominant, as said by Richard. This would be clearly the intepretation to go if the two last chords were turned around:



        ⅵ | ⅲ | Ⅴ/Ⅴ | Ⅴ


        I wouldn't interpret the G♯ as a secondary dominant here though, if it doesn't really depend on the Ⅴ chord.



      • As a borrowed chord from the Lydian mode. The F♯-Lydian scale is F♯-G♯-A♯-B♯-C♯-D♯-E♯-. I does contain all the third line as diatonic chords. Or you might say that this entire section modulates to d♯-Dorian.







      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        2
        down vote













        The Ⅱ chord can serve mostly two roles:





        • A secondary dominant, as said by Richard. This would be clearly the intepretation to go if the two last chords were turned around:



          ⅵ | ⅲ | Ⅴ/Ⅴ | Ⅴ


          I wouldn't interpret the G♯ as a secondary dominant here though, if it doesn't really depend on the Ⅴ chord.



        • As a borrowed chord from the Lydian mode. The F♯-Lydian scale is F♯-G♯-A♯-B♯-C♯-D♯-E♯-. I does contain all the third line as diatonic chords. Or you might say that this entire section modulates to d♯-Dorian.







        share|improve this answer























          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          The Ⅱ chord can serve mostly two roles:





          • A secondary dominant, as said by Richard. This would be clearly the intepretation to go if the two last chords were turned around:



            ⅵ | ⅲ | Ⅴ/Ⅴ | Ⅴ


            I wouldn't interpret the G♯ as a secondary dominant here though, if it doesn't really depend on the Ⅴ chord.



          • As a borrowed chord from the Lydian mode. The F♯-Lydian scale is F♯-G♯-A♯-B♯-C♯-D♯-E♯-. I does contain all the third line as diatonic chords. Or you might say that this entire section modulates to d♯-Dorian.







          share|improve this answer












          The Ⅱ chord can serve mostly two roles:





          • A secondary dominant, as said by Richard. This would be clearly the intepretation to go if the two last chords were turned around:



            ⅵ | ⅲ | Ⅴ/Ⅴ | Ⅴ


            I wouldn't interpret the G♯ as a secondary dominant here though, if it doesn't really depend on the Ⅴ chord.



          • As a borrowed chord from the Lydian mode. The F♯-Lydian scale is F♯-G♯-A♯-B♯-C♯-D♯-E♯-. I does contain all the third line as diatonic chords. Or you might say that this entire section modulates to d♯-Dorian.








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          leftaroundabout

          18.2k3181




          18.2k3181






















              up vote
              2
              down vote













              You've fallen into the common trap of seeing a scale, and the triads that can be formed from it, as a restriction.



              Yes, there is a set of chords that can be constructed from the notes of a scale. But that's no more than a mildly interesting fact. A song in a given key will use some of the diatonic chords a lot, others not so often. And other, non-diatonic chords will also very likely appear. The diatonic, scale-derived chords are not a restriction, not the chords that you MAY use. They're just the diatonic chords.



              For instance, consider the C major key. C, Dm, F, G, Am will probably be used a lot. But D7, C#dim, Bb, Fm are more likely to be used than the (diatonic) B dim. And, if you're playing blues-based styles, C7, F7 and G7 are the basic chords, two of which are non-diatonic!



              THE SCALE IS A FRAMEWORK, NOT A RESTRICTION.



              Once you absorb this, a lot of the 'borrowing' thing becomes unnecessary. Where a chromatic chord IS used as a gateway to a modulation, there's sense in calling it borrowed. An Fm chord in C major MIGHT be a pre-echo of a Fm7, Bb7, Eb modulation to Eb. So calling it 'borrowed from Eb major' is useful. But C C7, F, Fm, G7, C at the end of 'When the Saints' doesn't go anywhere. Just let C7 and Fm be chromatic chords. 'Borrowing' them doesn't help.






              share|improve this answer



























                up vote
                2
                down vote













                You've fallen into the common trap of seeing a scale, and the triads that can be formed from it, as a restriction.



                Yes, there is a set of chords that can be constructed from the notes of a scale. But that's no more than a mildly interesting fact. A song in a given key will use some of the diatonic chords a lot, others not so often. And other, non-diatonic chords will also very likely appear. The diatonic, scale-derived chords are not a restriction, not the chords that you MAY use. They're just the diatonic chords.



                For instance, consider the C major key. C, Dm, F, G, Am will probably be used a lot. But D7, C#dim, Bb, Fm are more likely to be used than the (diatonic) B dim. And, if you're playing blues-based styles, C7, F7 and G7 are the basic chords, two of which are non-diatonic!



                THE SCALE IS A FRAMEWORK, NOT A RESTRICTION.



                Once you absorb this, a lot of the 'borrowing' thing becomes unnecessary. Where a chromatic chord IS used as a gateway to a modulation, there's sense in calling it borrowed. An Fm chord in C major MIGHT be a pre-echo of a Fm7, Bb7, Eb modulation to Eb. So calling it 'borrowed from Eb major' is useful. But C C7, F, Fm, G7, C at the end of 'When the Saints' doesn't go anywhere. Just let C7 and Fm be chromatic chords. 'Borrowing' them doesn't help.






                share|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote









                  You've fallen into the common trap of seeing a scale, and the triads that can be formed from it, as a restriction.



                  Yes, there is a set of chords that can be constructed from the notes of a scale. But that's no more than a mildly interesting fact. A song in a given key will use some of the diatonic chords a lot, others not so often. And other, non-diatonic chords will also very likely appear. The diatonic, scale-derived chords are not a restriction, not the chords that you MAY use. They're just the diatonic chords.



                  For instance, consider the C major key. C, Dm, F, G, Am will probably be used a lot. But D7, C#dim, Bb, Fm are more likely to be used than the (diatonic) B dim. And, if you're playing blues-based styles, C7, F7 and G7 are the basic chords, two of which are non-diatonic!



                  THE SCALE IS A FRAMEWORK, NOT A RESTRICTION.



                  Once you absorb this, a lot of the 'borrowing' thing becomes unnecessary. Where a chromatic chord IS used as a gateway to a modulation, there's sense in calling it borrowed. An Fm chord in C major MIGHT be a pre-echo of a Fm7, Bb7, Eb modulation to Eb. So calling it 'borrowed from Eb major' is useful. But C C7, F, Fm, G7, C at the end of 'When the Saints' doesn't go anywhere. Just let C7 and Fm be chromatic chords. 'Borrowing' them doesn't help.






                  share|improve this answer














                  You've fallen into the common trap of seeing a scale, and the triads that can be formed from it, as a restriction.



                  Yes, there is a set of chords that can be constructed from the notes of a scale. But that's no more than a mildly interesting fact. A song in a given key will use some of the diatonic chords a lot, others not so often. And other, non-diatonic chords will also very likely appear. The diatonic, scale-derived chords are not a restriction, not the chords that you MAY use. They're just the diatonic chords.



                  For instance, consider the C major key. C, Dm, F, G, Am will probably be used a lot. But D7, C#dim, Bb, Fm are more likely to be used than the (diatonic) B dim. And, if you're playing blues-based styles, C7, F7 and G7 are the basic chords, two of which are non-diatonic!



                  THE SCALE IS A FRAMEWORK, NOT A RESTRICTION.



                  Once you absorb this, a lot of the 'borrowing' thing becomes unnecessary. Where a chromatic chord IS used as a gateway to a modulation, there's sense in calling it borrowed. An Fm chord in C major MIGHT be a pre-echo of a Fm7, Bb7, Eb modulation to Eb. So calling it 'borrowed from Eb major' is useful. But C C7, F, Fm, G7, C at the end of 'When the Saints' doesn't go anywhere. Just let C7 and Fm be chromatic chords. 'Borrowing' them doesn't help.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 2 days ago

























                  answered 2 days ago









                  Laurence Payne

                  29.2k1451




                  29.2k1451






















                      dharmatech is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


















                      dharmatech is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      dharmatech is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      dharmatech is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f76274%2fchord-exceptions-in-city-of-new-orleans%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest




















































































                      Popular posts from this blog

                      鏡平學校

                      ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

                      Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?