Unable to run prepared statement because user variable is too long?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












The issue



I have a working stored procedure (SP) that accepts 3 parameters (an id, a from date and a to date). This SP works fine in my test system where all of the values returned from t1.name in the GROUP_CONACT are rather short and there aren't many in the GROUP_CONCAT.



The issue is that when I put this in to the LIVE system, there are a few more questions to add to the GORUP_CONCAT and the t1.name values are a lot longer than expected.



From the outcome I can see when trying to debug the script, it appears that the issue is that the variable @SQL is not able to store all the information provided back from the GROUP_CONACT query.



The Code



CREATE DEFINER=`root`@`localhost` PROCEDURE `team_analyst_results`(in var1 int, in var2 DATE, in var3 DATE)
BEGIN


SELECT
GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT CONCAT('MAX(IF(question_id = '',
question_id,
'', Pass, Null)) AS ',
CONCAT(''', t1.name, ''')))
INTO @SQL FROM
smhubdb.questions t1
INNER JOIN
smhubdb.check_questions t2 ON t1.id = t2.question_id
INNER JOIN
smhubdb.quality_checks t3 ON t2.check_id = t3.id
INNER JOIN
smhubdb.users t4 ON t3.check_person = t4.id
WHERE
t4.team_id = var1
AND
t3.checked_date BETWEEN var2 AND var3
GROUP BY t3.check_person;

SET @SQL = CONCAT('SELECT t1.id AS "'"Check ID"'", t4.name AS "'"Name"'" ,DATE_FORMAT(t1.checked_date, "'"%d-%m-%Y"'") AS "'" Check Date "'" , ', @SQL, ' , t1.notes AS "'"Notes"'", CONCAT(ROUND((SUM(CASE WHEN t2.pass = 1 THEN t3.value ELSE 0 END) / SUM(t3.value) * 100),0),"'""'") AS "'"Score"'" FROM smhubdb.quality_checks t1 LEFT JOIN smhubdb.check_questions t2 ON t1.id = t2.check_id LEFT JOIN smhubdb.questions t3 on t2.question_id = t3.id INNER JOIN smhubdb.users t4 ON t1.check_person = t4.id WHERE t4.team_id = ''', var1 ,''' AND t1.checked_date BETWEEN ''', var2 ,''' AND ''', var3 ,''' GROUP BY t1.id ORDER BY t1.id DESC');


PREPARE stmt FROM @SQL;
EXECUTE stmt;
END


What I tried



I tried to set @SQL as a local variable (Obviously this dropped the @) but I then get an error attempting to prepare the statement at the bottom of the code explaining that it is not expecting the local variable.



The Purpose of the code



The code is used to populate a pivot table from an unknown number of results. Meaning that I need the first GROUP_CONCAT section to build the column names on the end statement to prepare.



Expected output



The number of questions will not be know, nor will the name of the question.






table, td, th {
border: 1px solid black;
}

table {
border-collapse: collapse;
}

<table>
<thead>
<th>
Name
</th>
<th>
Check ID
</th>
<th>
Date
</th>
<th>
Question1
</th>
<th>
Question2
</th>
<th>
Question3
</th>
<th>
Question4
</th>
<th>
Notes
</th>
<th>
Score
</th>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
Joe Bloggs
</td>
<td>
1
</td>
<td>
08/11/2018
</td>
<td>
Pass
</td>
<td>
Pass
</td>
<td>
Null
</td>
<td>
Pass
</td>
<td>
Some Notes
</td>
<td>
75%
</td>
<tr>
</tbody>
</table>












share|improve this question




















  • 1




    Search for group_concat_max_len
    – Paul Spiegel
    Nov 8 at 9:29










  • I hadn't even thought of there being a limit on the GROUP_CONCAT. Do you know if changing this value requires a DB restart?
    – Petay87
    Nov 8 at 9:32






  • 1




    I would just change it per session in your procedure: SET SESSION group_concat_max_len=1000000;
    – Paul Spiegel
    Nov 8 at 9:39















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












The issue



I have a working stored procedure (SP) that accepts 3 parameters (an id, a from date and a to date). This SP works fine in my test system where all of the values returned from t1.name in the GROUP_CONACT are rather short and there aren't many in the GROUP_CONCAT.



The issue is that when I put this in to the LIVE system, there are a few more questions to add to the GORUP_CONCAT and the t1.name values are a lot longer than expected.



From the outcome I can see when trying to debug the script, it appears that the issue is that the variable @SQL is not able to store all the information provided back from the GROUP_CONACT query.



The Code



CREATE DEFINER=`root`@`localhost` PROCEDURE `team_analyst_results`(in var1 int, in var2 DATE, in var3 DATE)
BEGIN


SELECT
GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT CONCAT('MAX(IF(question_id = '',
question_id,
'', Pass, Null)) AS ',
CONCAT(''', t1.name, ''')))
INTO @SQL FROM
smhubdb.questions t1
INNER JOIN
smhubdb.check_questions t2 ON t1.id = t2.question_id
INNER JOIN
smhubdb.quality_checks t3 ON t2.check_id = t3.id
INNER JOIN
smhubdb.users t4 ON t3.check_person = t4.id
WHERE
t4.team_id = var1
AND
t3.checked_date BETWEEN var2 AND var3
GROUP BY t3.check_person;

SET @SQL = CONCAT('SELECT t1.id AS "'"Check ID"'", t4.name AS "'"Name"'" ,DATE_FORMAT(t1.checked_date, "'"%d-%m-%Y"'") AS "'" Check Date "'" , ', @SQL, ' , t1.notes AS "'"Notes"'", CONCAT(ROUND((SUM(CASE WHEN t2.pass = 1 THEN t3.value ELSE 0 END) / SUM(t3.value) * 100),0),"'""'") AS "'"Score"'" FROM smhubdb.quality_checks t1 LEFT JOIN smhubdb.check_questions t2 ON t1.id = t2.check_id LEFT JOIN smhubdb.questions t3 on t2.question_id = t3.id INNER JOIN smhubdb.users t4 ON t1.check_person = t4.id WHERE t4.team_id = ''', var1 ,''' AND t1.checked_date BETWEEN ''', var2 ,''' AND ''', var3 ,''' GROUP BY t1.id ORDER BY t1.id DESC');


PREPARE stmt FROM @SQL;
EXECUTE stmt;
END


What I tried



I tried to set @SQL as a local variable (Obviously this dropped the @) but I then get an error attempting to prepare the statement at the bottom of the code explaining that it is not expecting the local variable.



The Purpose of the code



The code is used to populate a pivot table from an unknown number of results. Meaning that I need the first GROUP_CONCAT section to build the column names on the end statement to prepare.



Expected output



The number of questions will not be know, nor will the name of the question.






table, td, th {
border: 1px solid black;
}

table {
border-collapse: collapse;
}

<table>
<thead>
<th>
Name
</th>
<th>
Check ID
</th>
<th>
Date
</th>
<th>
Question1
</th>
<th>
Question2
</th>
<th>
Question3
</th>
<th>
Question4
</th>
<th>
Notes
</th>
<th>
Score
</th>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
Joe Bloggs
</td>
<td>
1
</td>
<td>
08/11/2018
</td>
<td>
Pass
</td>
<td>
Pass
</td>
<td>
Null
</td>
<td>
Pass
</td>
<td>
Some Notes
</td>
<td>
75%
</td>
<tr>
</tbody>
</table>












share|improve this question




















  • 1




    Search for group_concat_max_len
    – Paul Spiegel
    Nov 8 at 9:29










  • I hadn't even thought of there being a limit on the GROUP_CONCAT. Do you know if changing this value requires a DB restart?
    – Petay87
    Nov 8 at 9:32






  • 1




    I would just change it per session in your procedure: SET SESSION group_concat_max_len=1000000;
    – Paul Spiegel
    Nov 8 at 9:39













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











The issue



I have a working stored procedure (SP) that accepts 3 parameters (an id, a from date and a to date). This SP works fine in my test system where all of the values returned from t1.name in the GROUP_CONACT are rather short and there aren't many in the GROUP_CONCAT.



The issue is that when I put this in to the LIVE system, there are a few more questions to add to the GORUP_CONCAT and the t1.name values are a lot longer than expected.



From the outcome I can see when trying to debug the script, it appears that the issue is that the variable @SQL is not able to store all the information provided back from the GROUP_CONACT query.



The Code



CREATE DEFINER=`root`@`localhost` PROCEDURE `team_analyst_results`(in var1 int, in var2 DATE, in var3 DATE)
BEGIN


SELECT
GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT CONCAT('MAX(IF(question_id = '',
question_id,
'', Pass, Null)) AS ',
CONCAT(''', t1.name, ''')))
INTO @SQL FROM
smhubdb.questions t1
INNER JOIN
smhubdb.check_questions t2 ON t1.id = t2.question_id
INNER JOIN
smhubdb.quality_checks t3 ON t2.check_id = t3.id
INNER JOIN
smhubdb.users t4 ON t3.check_person = t4.id
WHERE
t4.team_id = var1
AND
t3.checked_date BETWEEN var2 AND var3
GROUP BY t3.check_person;

SET @SQL = CONCAT('SELECT t1.id AS "'"Check ID"'", t4.name AS "'"Name"'" ,DATE_FORMAT(t1.checked_date, "'"%d-%m-%Y"'") AS "'" Check Date "'" , ', @SQL, ' , t1.notes AS "'"Notes"'", CONCAT(ROUND((SUM(CASE WHEN t2.pass = 1 THEN t3.value ELSE 0 END) / SUM(t3.value) * 100),0),"'""'") AS "'"Score"'" FROM smhubdb.quality_checks t1 LEFT JOIN smhubdb.check_questions t2 ON t1.id = t2.check_id LEFT JOIN smhubdb.questions t3 on t2.question_id = t3.id INNER JOIN smhubdb.users t4 ON t1.check_person = t4.id WHERE t4.team_id = ''', var1 ,''' AND t1.checked_date BETWEEN ''', var2 ,''' AND ''', var3 ,''' GROUP BY t1.id ORDER BY t1.id DESC');


PREPARE stmt FROM @SQL;
EXECUTE stmt;
END


What I tried



I tried to set @SQL as a local variable (Obviously this dropped the @) but I then get an error attempting to prepare the statement at the bottom of the code explaining that it is not expecting the local variable.



The Purpose of the code



The code is used to populate a pivot table from an unknown number of results. Meaning that I need the first GROUP_CONCAT section to build the column names on the end statement to prepare.



Expected output



The number of questions will not be know, nor will the name of the question.






table, td, th {
border: 1px solid black;
}

table {
border-collapse: collapse;
}

<table>
<thead>
<th>
Name
</th>
<th>
Check ID
</th>
<th>
Date
</th>
<th>
Question1
</th>
<th>
Question2
</th>
<th>
Question3
</th>
<th>
Question4
</th>
<th>
Notes
</th>
<th>
Score
</th>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
Joe Bloggs
</td>
<td>
1
</td>
<td>
08/11/2018
</td>
<td>
Pass
</td>
<td>
Pass
</td>
<td>
Null
</td>
<td>
Pass
</td>
<td>
Some Notes
</td>
<td>
75%
</td>
<tr>
</tbody>
</table>












share|improve this question















The issue



I have a working stored procedure (SP) that accepts 3 parameters (an id, a from date and a to date). This SP works fine in my test system where all of the values returned from t1.name in the GROUP_CONACT are rather short and there aren't many in the GROUP_CONCAT.



The issue is that when I put this in to the LIVE system, there are a few more questions to add to the GORUP_CONCAT and the t1.name values are a lot longer than expected.



From the outcome I can see when trying to debug the script, it appears that the issue is that the variable @SQL is not able to store all the information provided back from the GROUP_CONACT query.



The Code



CREATE DEFINER=`root`@`localhost` PROCEDURE `team_analyst_results`(in var1 int, in var2 DATE, in var3 DATE)
BEGIN


SELECT
GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT CONCAT('MAX(IF(question_id = '',
question_id,
'', Pass, Null)) AS ',
CONCAT(''', t1.name, ''')))
INTO @SQL FROM
smhubdb.questions t1
INNER JOIN
smhubdb.check_questions t2 ON t1.id = t2.question_id
INNER JOIN
smhubdb.quality_checks t3 ON t2.check_id = t3.id
INNER JOIN
smhubdb.users t4 ON t3.check_person = t4.id
WHERE
t4.team_id = var1
AND
t3.checked_date BETWEEN var2 AND var3
GROUP BY t3.check_person;

SET @SQL = CONCAT('SELECT t1.id AS "'"Check ID"'", t4.name AS "'"Name"'" ,DATE_FORMAT(t1.checked_date, "'"%d-%m-%Y"'") AS "'" Check Date "'" , ', @SQL, ' , t1.notes AS "'"Notes"'", CONCAT(ROUND((SUM(CASE WHEN t2.pass = 1 THEN t3.value ELSE 0 END) / SUM(t3.value) * 100),0),"'""'") AS "'"Score"'" FROM smhubdb.quality_checks t1 LEFT JOIN smhubdb.check_questions t2 ON t1.id = t2.check_id LEFT JOIN smhubdb.questions t3 on t2.question_id = t3.id INNER JOIN smhubdb.users t4 ON t1.check_person = t4.id WHERE t4.team_id = ''', var1 ,''' AND t1.checked_date BETWEEN ''', var2 ,''' AND ''', var3 ,''' GROUP BY t1.id ORDER BY t1.id DESC');


PREPARE stmt FROM @SQL;
EXECUTE stmt;
END


What I tried



I tried to set @SQL as a local variable (Obviously this dropped the @) but I then get an error attempting to prepare the statement at the bottom of the code explaining that it is not expecting the local variable.



The Purpose of the code



The code is used to populate a pivot table from an unknown number of results. Meaning that I need the first GROUP_CONCAT section to build the column names on the end statement to prepare.



Expected output



The number of questions will not be know, nor will the name of the question.






table, td, th {
border: 1px solid black;
}

table {
border-collapse: collapse;
}

<table>
<thead>
<th>
Name
</th>
<th>
Check ID
</th>
<th>
Date
</th>
<th>
Question1
</th>
<th>
Question2
</th>
<th>
Question3
</th>
<th>
Question4
</th>
<th>
Notes
</th>
<th>
Score
</th>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
Joe Bloggs
</td>
<td>
1
</td>
<td>
08/11/2018
</td>
<td>
Pass
</td>
<td>
Pass
</td>
<td>
Null
</td>
<td>
Pass
</td>
<td>
Some Notes
</td>
<td>
75%
</td>
<tr>
</tbody>
</table>








table, td, th {
border: 1px solid black;
}

table {
border-collapse: collapse;
}

<table>
<thead>
<th>
Name
</th>
<th>
Check ID
</th>
<th>
Date
</th>
<th>
Question1
</th>
<th>
Question2
</th>
<th>
Question3
</th>
<th>
Question4
</th>
<th>
Notes
</th>
<th>
Score
</th>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
Joe Bloggs
</td>
<td>
1
</td>
<td>
08/11/2018
</td>
<td>
Pass
</td>
<td>
Pass
</td>
<td>
Null
</td>
<td>
Pass
</td>
<td>
Some Notes
</td>
<td>
75%
</td>
<tr>
</tbody>
</table>





table, td, th {
border: 1px solid black;
}

table {
border-collapse: collapse;
}

<table>
<thead>
<th>
Name
</th>
<th>
Check ID
</th>
<th>
Date
</th>
<th>
Question1
</th>
<th>
Question2
</th>
<th>
Question3
</th>
<th>
Question4
</th>
<th>
Notes
</th>
<th>
Score
</th>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
Joe Bloggs
</td>
<td>
1
</td>
<td>
08/11/2018
</td>
<td>
Pass
</td>
<td>
Pass
</td>
<td>
Null
</td>
<td>
Pass
</td>
<td>
Some Notes
</td>
<td>
75%
</td>
<tr>
</tbody>
</table>






mysql variables prepared-statement pivot-table user-variables






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 8 at 9:45









Giorgos Myrianthous

3,52621233




3,52621233










asked Nov 8 at 9:24









Petay87

57431132




57431132








  • 1




    Search for group_concat_max_len
    – Paul Spiegel
    Nov 8 at 9:29










  • I hadn't even thought of there being a limit on the GROUP_CONCAT. Do you know if changing this value requires a DB restart?
    – Petay87
    Nov 8 at 9:32






  • 1




    I would just change it per session in your procedure: SET SESSION group_concat_max_len=1000000;
    – Paul Spiegel
    Nov 8 at 9:39














  • 1




    Search for group_concat_max_len
    – Paul Spiegel
    Nov 8 at 9:29










  • I hadn't even thought of there being a limit on the GROUP_CONCAT. Do you know if changing this value requires a DB restart?
    – Petay87
    Nov 8 at 9:32






  • 1




    I would just change it per session in your procedure: SET SESSION group_concat_max_len=1000000;
    – Paul Spiegel
    Nov 8 at 9:39








1




1




Search for group_concat_max_len
– Paul Spiegel
Nov 8 at 9:29




Search for group_concat_max_len
– Paul Spiegel
Nov 8 at 9:29












I hadn't even thought of there being a limit on the GROUP_CONCAT. Do you know if changing this value requires a DB restart?
– Petay87
Nov 8 at 9:32




I hadn't even thought of there being a limit on the GROUP_CONCAT. Do you know if changing this value requires a DB restart?
– Petay87
Nov 8 at 9:32




1




1




I would just change it per session in your procedure: SET SESSION group_concat_max_len=1000000;
– Paul Spiegel
Nov 8 at 9:39




I would just change it per session in your procedure: SET SESSION group_concat_max_len=1000000;
– Paul Spiegel
Nov 8 at 9:39












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










You need to increase the value of group_concat_max_len.
To do so, you can run



SET GLOBAL group_concat_max_len=..;


However, once your database is restarted, this parameter will no longer be effective. To permanently change the value of group_concat_max_len, you need to add the following line under my.cnf file:



[mysqld]
group_concat_max_len=..





share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53204751%2funable-to-run-prepared-statement-because-user-variable-is-too-long%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest
































    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    You need to increase the value of group_concat_max_len.
    To do so, you can run



    SET GLOBAL group_concat_max_len=..;


    However, once your database is restarted, this parameter will no longer be effective. To permanently change the value of group_concat_max_len, you need to add the following line under my.cnf file:



    [mysqld]
    group_concat_max_len=..





    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      You need to increase the value of group_concat_max_len.
      To do so, you can run



      SET GLOBAL group_concat_max_len=..;


      However, once your database is restarted, this parameter will no longer be effective. To permanently change the value of group_concat_max_len, you need to add the following line under my.cnf file:



      [mysqld]
      group_concat_max_len=..





      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        You need to increase the value of group_concat_max_len.
        To do so, you can run



        SET GLOBAL group_concat_max_len=..;


        However, once your database is restarted, this parameter will no longer be effective. To permanently change the value of group_concat_max_len, you need to add the following line under my.cnf file:



        [mysqld]
        group_concat_max_len=..





        share|improve this answer












        You need to increase the value of group_concat_max_len.
        To do so, you can run



        SET GLOBAL group_concat_max_len=..;


        However, once your database is restarted, this parameter will no longer be effective. To permanently change the value of group_concat_max_len, you need to add the following line under my.cnf file:



        [mysqld]
        group_concat_max_len=..






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 8 at 9:44









        Giorgos Myrianthous

        3,52621233




        3,52621233






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53204751%2funable-to-run-prepared-statement-because-user-variable-is-too-long%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest




















































































            Popular posts from this blog

            鏡平學校

            ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

            Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?