When does a chess clock start?











up vote
14
down vote

favorite













  • Lichess.org starts the clock of each player after their first move.

  • Chess.com starts the clock when the players agree to a match, before
    their first move.


I think Lichess is correct, that's what we do where I play. What's the rule?










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    I don't think either is particularly close to the FIDE rules. But online matches usually operate under different constraints. When players are matched against one another, one or both may have been waiting a while and stopped paying attention, so they may not know when a game is actually started. Lichess now simply gives each player some initial time to make a first move and from then on uses a standard clock. It aborts if either doesn't start the game in twenty or thirty seconds. I don't know chess.com. (Is that the one that grew out of ICS? I still use FICS sometimes.)
    – Scott Sauyet
    Nov 9 at 0:16










  • "Lichess.org starts the clock of each player after their first move.": you mean that if I'm black, I can take as long as I want to decide which line I want to play after seeing white's first move? That seems strange. Do you mean that white's first move causes black's clock t start?
    – terdon
    Nov 9 at 12:34










  • @terdon no you cannot take as long as you want, you have 15s or so otherwise the game is abandoned. What I meant is your initial time won't start decreasing unless you make the first move. Each player's time decreases after his first move
    – Lynob
    Nov 9 at 12:38










  • Ah, right. But those 15s don't count towards black's time? That still seems a bit unfair, especially for bullet games. But thanks for the clarification.
    – terdon
    Nov 9 at 12:39






  • 1




    @Lynob: Ah, yes. I was a fan of ICS before they took it commercial and of FICS for years; but I mostly use LiChess these days.
    – Scott Sauyet
    Nov 9 at 14:11















up vote
14
down vote

favorite













  • Lichess.org starts the clock of each player after their first move.

  • Chess.com starts the clock when the players agree to a match, before
    their first move.


I think Lichess is correct, that's what we do where I play. What's the rule?










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    I don't think either is particularly close to the FIDE rules. But online matches usually operate under different constraints. When players are matched against one another, one or both may have been waiting a while and stopped paying attention, so they may not know when a game is actually started. Lichess now simply gives each player some initial time to make a first move and from then on uses a standard clock. It aborts if either doesn't start the game in twenty or thirty seconds. I don't know chess.com. (Is that the one that grew out of ICS? I still use FICS sometimes.)
    – Scott Sauyet
    Nov 9 at 0:16










  • "Lichess.org starts the clock of each player after their first move.": you mean that if I'm black, I can take as long as I want to decide which line I want to play after seeing white's first move? That seems strange. Do you mean that white's first move causes black's clock t start?
    – terdon
    Nov 9 at 12:34










  • @terdon no you cannot take as long as you want, you have 15s or so otherwise the game is abandoned. What I meant is your initial time won't start decreasing unless you make the first move. Each player's time decreases after his first move
    – Lynob
    Nov 9 at 12:38










  • Ah, right. But those 15s don't count towards black's time? That still seems a bit unfair, especially for bullet games. But thanks for the clarification.
    – terdon
    Nov 9 at 12:39






  • 1




    @Lynob: Ah, yes. I was a fan of ICS before they took it commercial and of FICS for years; but I mostly use LiChess these days.
    – Scott Sauyet
    Nov 9 at 14:11













up vote
14
down vote

favorite









up vote
14
down vote

favorite












  • Lichess.org starts the clock of each player after their first move.

  • Chess.com starts the clock when the players agree to a match, before
    their first move.


I think Lichess is correct, that's what we do where I play. What's the rule?










share|improve this question
















  • Lichess.org starts the clock of each player after their first move.

  • Chess.com starts the clock when the players agree to a match, before
    their first move.


I think Lichess is correct, that's what we do where I play. What's the rule?







rules chess-clocks






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 8 at 14:34









Glorfindel

12.3k43557




12.3k43557










asked Nov 8 at 14:06









Lynob

2,83122258




2,83122258








  • 2




    I don't think either is particularly close to the FIDE rules. But online matches usually operate under different constraints. When players are matched against one another, one or both may have been waiting a while and stopped paying attention, so they may not know when a game is actually started. Lichess now simply gives each player some initial time to make a first move and from then on uses a standard clock. It aborts if either doesn't start the game in twenty or thirty seconds. I don't know chess.com. (Is that the one that grew out of ICS? I still use FICS sometimes.)
    – Scott Sauyet
    Nov 9 at 0:16










  • "Lichess.org starts the clock of each player after their first move.": you mean that if I'm black, I can take as long as I want to decide which line I want to play after seeing white's first move? That seems strange. Do you mean that white's first move causes black's clock t start?
    – terdon
    Nov 9 at 12:34










  • @terdon no you cannot take as long as you want, you have 15s or so otherwise the game is abandoned. What I meant is your initial time won't start decreasing unless you make the first move. Each player's time decreases after his first move
    – Lynob
    Nov 9 at 12:38










  • Ah, right. But those 15s don't count towards black's time? That still seems a bit unfair, especially for bullet games. But thanks for the clarification.
    – terdon
    Nov 9 at 12:39






  • 1




    @Lynob: Ah, yes. I was a fan of ICS before they took it commercial and of FICS for years; but I mostly use LiChess these days.
    – Scott Sauyet
    Nov 9 at 14:11














  • 2




    I don't think either is particularly close to the FIDE rules. But online matches usually operate under different constraints. When players are matched against one another, one or both may have been waiting a while and stopped paying attention, so they may not know when a game is actually started. Lichess now simply gives each player some initial time to make a first move and from then on uses a standard clock. It aborts if either doesn't start the game in twenty or thirty seconds. I don't know chess.com. (Is that the one that grew out of ICS? I still use FICS sometimes.)
    – Scott Sauyet
    Nov 9 at 0:16










  • "Lichess.org starts the clock of each player after their first move.": you mean that if I'm black, I can take as long as I want to decide which line I want to play after seeing white's first move? That seems strange. Do you mean that white's first move causes black's clock t start?
    – terdon
    Nov 9 at 12:34










  • @terdon no you cannot take as long as you want, you have 15s or so otherwise the game is abandoned. What I meant is your initial time won't start decreasing unless you make the first move. Each player's time decreases after his first move
    – Lynob
    Nov 9 at 12:38










  • Ah, right. But those 15s don't count towards black's time? That still seems a bit unfair, especially for bullet games. But thanks for the clarification.
    – terdon
    Nov 9 at 12:39






  • 1




    @Lynob: Ah, yes. I was a fan of ICS before they took it commercial and of FICS for years; but I mostly use LiChess these days.
    – Scott Sauyet
    Nov 9 at 14:11








2




2




I don't think either is particularly close to the FIDE rules. But online matches usually operate under different constraints. When players are matched against one another, one or both may have been waiting a while and stopped paying attention, so they may not know when a game is actually started. Lichess now simply gives each player some initial time to make a first move and from then on uses a standard clock. It aborts if either doesn't start the game in twenty or thirty seconds. I don't know chess.com. (Is that the one that grew out of ICS? I still use FICS sometimes.)
– Scott Sauyet
Nov 9 at 0:16




I don't think either is particularly close to the FIDE rules. But online matches usually operate under different constraints. When players are matched against one another, one or both may have been waiting a while and stopped paying attention, so they may not know when a game is actually started. Lichess now simply gives each player some initial time to make a first move and from then on uses a standard clock. It aborts if either doesn't start the game in twenty or thirty seconds. I don't know chess.com. (Is that the one that grew out of ICS? I still use FICS sometimes.)
– Scott Sauyet
Nov 9 at 0:16












"Lichess.org starts the clock of each player after their first move.": you mean that if I'm black, I can take as long as I want to decide which line I want to play after seeing white's first move? That seems strange. Do you mean that white's first move causes black's clock t start?
– terdon
Nov 9 at 12:34




"Lichess.org starts the clock of each player after their first move.": you mean that if I'm black, I can take as long as I want to decide which line I want to play after seeing white's first move? That seems strange. Do you mean that white's first move causes black's clock t start?
– terdon
Nov 9 at 12:34












@terdon no you cannot take as long as you want, you have 15s or so otherwise the game is abandoned. What I meant is your initial time won't start decreasing unless you make the first move. Each player's time decreases after his first move
– Lynob
Nov 9 at 12:38




@terdon no you cannot take as long as you want, you have 15s or so otherwise the game is abandoned. What I meant is your initial time won't start decreasing unless you make the first move. Each player's time decreases after his first move
– Lynob
Nov 9 at 12:38












Ah, right. But those 15s don't count towards black's time? That still seems a bit unfair, especially for bullet games. But thanks for the clarification.
– terdon
Nov 9 at 12:39




Ah, right. But those 15s don't count towards black's time? That still seems a bit unfair, especially for bullet games. But thanks for the clarification.
– terdon
Nov 9 at 12:39




1




1




@Lynob: Ah, yes. I was a fan of ICS before they took it commercial and of FICS for years; but I mostly use LiChess these days.
– Scott Sauyet
Nov 9 at 14:11




@Lynob: Ah, yes. I was a fan of ICS before they took it commercial and of FICS for years; but I mostly use LiChess these days.
– Scott Sauyet
Nov 9 at 14:11










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
22
down vote



accepted










According to the FIDE rules,




6.6 At the time determined for the start of the game White’s clock is started.




In over the board chess, it's usually Black who does this (you can't have an arbiter start all clocks simultaneously) after the players shake hands and wish each other good luck. If White isn't present, Black may start the clock anyway at the designated time; if Black isn't present, White should start his/her own clock, make a move and press their side of the clock to start Black's. (Of course, in some events, failing to show up at the designated start time constitutes an immediate loss anyway.)



So actually chess.com's method is closer to the official rules, though those games are of course not regulated by the FIDE rules.






share|improve this answer





















  • The $50,000 question would be when/how the time for the start of the game is determined. If/when both players agree to all conditions surrounding a game, and agree that it should start immediately, then it would make sense to start the clock without further ado, but it's necessary to discuss anything first, such discussion should take place before the clocks start. I think LiChess takes the philosophy that black's first move is what indicates agreement to play the game, while Chess.com seeks such agreement separately.
    – supercat
    Nov 9 at 1:06











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "435"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f22824%2fwhen-does-a-chess-clock-start%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
22
down vote



accepted










According to the FIDE rules,




6.6 At the time determined for the start of the game White’s clock is started.




In over the board chess, it's usually Black who does this (you can't have an arbiter start all clocks simultaneously) after the players shake hands and wish each other good luck. If White isn't present, Black may start the clock anyway at the designated time; if Black isn't present, White should start his/her own clock, make a move and press their side of the clock to start Black's. (Of course, in some events, failing to show up at the designated start time constitutes an immediate loss anyway.)



So actually chess.com's method is closer to the official rules, though those games are of course not regulated by the FIDE rules.






share|improve this answer





















  • The $50,000 question would be when/how the time for the start of the game is determined. If/when both players agree to all conditions surrounding a game, and agree that it should start immediately, then it would make sense to start the clock without further ado, but it's necessary to discuss anything first, such discussion should take place before the clocks start. I think LiChess takes the philosophy that black's first move is what indicates agreement to play the game, while Chess.com seeks such agreement separately.
    – supercat
    Nov 9 at 1:06















up vote
22
down vote



accepted










According to the FIDE rules,




6.6 At the time determined for the start of the game White’s clock is started.




In over the board chess, it's usually Black who does this (you can't have an arbiter start all clocks simultaneously) after the players shake hands and wish each other good luck. If White isn't present, Black may start the clock anyway at the designated time; if Black isn't present, White should start his/her own clock, make a move and press their side of the clock to start Black's. (Of course, in some events, failing to show up at the designated start time constitutes an immediate loss anyway.)



So actually chess.com's method is closer to the official rules, though those games are of course not regulated by the FIDE rules.






share|improve this answer





















  • The $50,000 question would be when/how the time for the start of the game is determined. If/when both players agree to all conditions surrounding a game, and agree that it should start immediately, then it would make sense to start the clock without further ado, but it's necessary to discuss anything first, such discussion should take place before the clocks start. I think LiChess takes the philosophy that black's first move is what indicates agreement to play the game, while Chess.com seeks such agreement separately.
    – supercat
    Nov 9 at 1:06













up vote
22
down vote



accepted







up vote
22
down vote



accepted






According to the FIDE rules,




6.6 At the time determined for the start of the game White’s clock is started.




In over the board chess, it's usually Black who does this (you can't have an arbiter start all clocks simultaneously) after the players shake hands and wish each other good luck. If White isn't present, Black may start the clock anyway at the designated time; if Black isn't present, White should start his/her own clock, make a move and press their side of the clock to start Black's. (Of course, in some events, failing to show up at the designated start time constitutes an immediate loss anyway.)



So actually chess.com's method is closer to the official rules, though those games are of course not regulated by the FIDE rules.






share|improve this answer












According to the FIDE rules,




6.6 At the time determined for the start of the game White’s clock is started.




In over the board chess, it's usually Black who does this (you can't have an arbiter start all clocks simultaneously) after the players shake hands and wish each other good luck. If White isn't present, Black may start the clock anyway at the designated time; if Black isn't present, White should start his/her own clock, make a move and press their side of the clock to start Black's. (Of course, in some events, failing to show up at the designated start time constitutes an immediate loss anyway.)



So actually chess.com's method is closer to the official rules, though those games are of course not regulated by the FIDE rules.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 8 at 14:33









Glorfindel

12.3k43557




12.3k43557












  • The $50,000 question would be when/how the time for the start of the game is determined. If/when both players agree to all conditions surrounding a game, and agree that it should start immediately, then it would make sense to start the clock without further ado, but it's necessary to discuss anything first, such discussion should take place before the clocks start. I think LiChess takes the philosophy that black's first move is what indicates agreement to play the game, while Chess.com seeks such agreement separately.
    – supercat
    Nov 9 at 1:06


















  • The $50,000 question would be when/how the time for the start of the game is determined. If/when both players agree to all conditions surrounding a game, and agree that it should start immediately, then it would make sense to start the clock without further ado, but it's necessary to discuss anything first, such discussion should take place before the clocks start. I think LiChess takes the philosophy that black's first move is what indicates agreement to play the game, while Chess.com seeks such agreement separately.
    – supercat
    Nov 9 at 1:06
















The $50,000 question would be when/how the time for the start of the game is determined. If/when both players agree to all conditions surrounding a game, and agree that it should start immediately, then it would make sense to start the clock without further ado, but it's necessary to discuss anything first, such discussion should take place before the clocks start. I think LiChess takes the philosophy that black's first move is what indicates agreement to play the game, while Chess.com seeks such agreement separately.
– supercat
Nov 9 at 1:06




The $50,000 question would be when/how the time for the start of the game is determined. If/when both players agree to all conditions surrounding a game, and agree that it should start immediately, then it would make sense to start the clock without further ado, but it's necessary to discuss anything first, such discussion should take place before the clocks start. I think LiChess takes the philosophy that black's first move is what indicates agreement to play the game, while Chess.com seeks such agreement separately.
– supercat
Nov 9 at 1:06


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f22824%2fwhen-does-a-chess-clock-start%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

鏡平學校

ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?