PHP / Laravel - Combine result (Model relationship)











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












Right now I have below data:



First



Second



Now the problem with above is, that it's creating a new array for each entry in my database.



I would very much like to get below output:



Third



Fourth



The difference is here that:




  • All the routes that are the same, should be grouped. So if the Route is the same, it should be under the same route list.

  • If the Carrier under the route is the same, then it should be under that route and carrier


  • If the route is different, it should start a new list (**Route: XYZ to XYZ)



Current Code:



Controller.php:



public function show()
{
$routes = Routes::where('id', '>=', 1)
->with('routeStops', 'getVessel')
->get()
->toArray();

foreach ($routes as $key => $value) {
echo '<h2>Route: ' . $value['origin'] . ' to ' . $value['destination'] . '</h2>';
$carrier = Carriers::where('id', $value['get_vessel']['carriers_id'])->first()->name;
echo 'Carrier: ' . $carrier . '';
dump($value);
}

}


This is my models:



Routes.php



/**
* Get the route stop associated with this route.
*/
public function routeStops()
{
return $this->hasMany('AppRouteStops', 'route_id');
}

/**
* Get the vessel record associated with this route.
*/
public function getVessel()
{
return $this->belongsTo('AppVessels', 'vessel_id');
}


How can I do so I achieve the 2nd desired output?










share|improve this question






















  • Please rework your question so as not to rely on screenshots of "data" and show what effort you have made to solve any problems yourself.
    – miken32
    Nov 12 at 20:59












  • @miken32 - I have posted the code below the screenshots. I can replace the screenshots with the array strings, but thought it might be more useful to see the desired output visually. I don't know what more code to post, as I am stuck.
    – oliverbj
    Nov 12 at 21:03










  • For someone without images enabled, it's much less useful. "Right now I have below data: The difference is here that:..."
    – miken32
    Nov 12 at 21:05















up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












Right now I have below data:



First



Second



Now the problem with above is, that it's creating a new array for each entry in my database.



I would very much like to get below output:



Third



Fourth



The difference is here that:




  • All the routes that are the same, should be grouped. So if the Route is the same, it should be under the same route list.

  • If the Carrier under the route is the same, then it should be under that route and carrier


  • If the route is different, it should start a new list (**Route: XYZ to XYZ)



Current Code:



Controller.php:



public function show()
{
$routes = Routes::where('id', '>=', 1)
->with('routeStops', 'getVessel')
->get()
->toArray();

foreach ($routes as $key => $value) {
echo '<h2>Route: ' . $value['origin'] . ' to ' . $value['destination'] . '</h2>';
$carrier = Carriers::where('id', $value['get_vessel']['carriers_id'])->first()->name;
echo 'Carrier: ' . $carrier . '';
dump($value);
}

}


This is my models:



Routes.php



/**
* Get the route stop associated with this route.
*/
public function routeStops()
{
return $this->hasMany('AppRouteStops', 'route_id');
}

/**
* Get the vessel record associated with this route.
*/
public function getVessel()
{
return $this->belongsTo('AppVessels', 'vessel_id');
}


How can I do so I achieve the 2nd desired output?










share|improve this question






















  • Please rework your question so as not to rely on screenshots of "data" and show what effort you have made to solve any problems yourself.
    – miken32
    Nov 12 at 20:59












  • @miken32 - I have posted the code below the screenshots. I can replace the screenshots with the array strings, but thought it might be more useful to see the desired output visually. I don't know what more code to post, as I am stuck.
    – oliverbj
    Nov 12 at 21:03










  • For someone without images enabled, it's much less useful. "Right now I have below data: The difference is here that:..."
    – miken32
    Nov 12 at 21:05













up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1






1





Right now I have below data:



First



Second



Now the problem with above is, that it's creating a new array for each entry in my database.



I would very much like to get below output:



Third



Fourth



The difference is here that:




  • All the routes that are the same, should be grouped. So if the Route is the same, it should be under the same route list.

  • If the Carrier under the route is the same, then it should be under that route and carrier


  • If the route is different, it should start a new list (**Route: XYZ to XYZ)



Current Code:



Controller.php:



public function show()
{
$routes = Routes::where('id', '>=', 1)
->with('routeStops', 'getVessel')
->get()
->toArray();

foreach ($routes as $key => $value) {
echo '<h2>Route: ' . $value['origin'] . ' to ' . $value['destination'] . '</h2>';
$carrier = Carriers::where('id', $value['get_vessel']['carriers_id'])->first()->name;
echo 'Carrier: ' . $carrier . '';
dump($value);
}

}


This is my models:



Routes.php



/**
* Get the route stop associated with this route.
*/
public function routeStops()
{
return $this->hasMany('AppRouteStops', 'route_id');
}

/**
* Get the vessel record associated with this route.
*/
public function getVessel()
{
return $this->belongsTo('AppVessels', 'vessel_id');
}


How can I do so I achieve the 2nd desired output?










share|improve this question













Right now I have below data:



First



Second



Now the problem with above is, that it's creating a new array for each entry in my database.



I would very much like to get below output:



Third



Fourth



The difference is here that:




  • All the routes that are the same, should be grouped. So if the Route is the same, it should be under the same route list.

  • If the Carrier under the route is the same, then it should be under that route and carrier


  • If the route is different, it should start a new list (**Route: XYZ to XYZ)



Current Code:



Controller.php:



public function show()
{
$routes = Routes::where('id', '>=', 1)
->with('routeStops', 'getVessel')
->get()
->toArray();

foreach ($routes as $key => $value) {
echo '<h2>Route: ' . $value['origin'] . ' to ' . $value['destination'] . '</h2>';
$carrier = Carriers::where('id', $value['get_vessel']['carriers_id'])->first()->name;
echo 'Carrier: ' . $carrier . '';
dump($value);
}

}


This is my models:



Routes.php



/**
* Get the route stop associated with this route.
*/
public function routeStops()
{
return $this->hasMany('AppRouteStops', 'route_id');
}

/**
* Get the vessel record associated with this route.
*/
public function getVessel()
{
return $this->belongsTo('AppVessels', 'vessel_id');
}


How can I do so I achieve the 2nd desired output?







php laravel relationship






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 12 at 20:36









oliverbj

2,085165591




2,085165591












  • Please rework your question so as not to rely on screenshots of "data" and show what effort you have made to solve any problems yourself.
    – miken32
    Nov 12 at 20:59












  • @miken32 - I have posted the code below the screenshots. I can replace the screenshots with the array strings, but thought it might be more useful to see the desired output visually. I don't know what more code to post, as I am stuck.
    – oliverbj
    Nov 12 at 21:03










  • For someone without images enabled, it's much less useful. "Right now I have below data: The difference is here that:..."
    – miken32
    Nov 12 at 21:05


















  • Please rework your question so as not to rely on screenshots of "data" and show what effort you have made to solve any problems yourself.
    – miken32
    Nov 12 at 20:59












  • @miken32 - I have posted the code below the screenshots. I can replace the screenshots with the array strings, but thought it might be more useful to see the desired output visually. I don't know what more code to post, as I am stuck.
    – oliverbj
    Nov 12 at 21:03










  • For someone without images enabled, it's much less useful. "Right now I have below data: The difference is here that:..."
    – miken32
    Nov 12 at 21:05
















Please rework your question so as not to rely on screenshots of "data" and show what effort you have made to solve any problems yourself.
– miken32
Nov 12 at 20:59






Please rework your question so as not to rely on screenshots of "data" and show what effort you have made to solve any problems yourself.
– miken32
Nov 12 at 20:59














@miken32 - I have posted the code below the screenshots. I can replace the screenshots with the array strings, but thought it might be more useful to see the desired output visually. I don't know what more code to post, as I am stuck.
– oliverbj
Nov 12 at 21:03




@miken32 - I have posted the code below the screenshots. I can replace the screenshots with the array strings, but thought it might be more useful to see the desired output visually. I don't know what more code to post, as I am stuck.
– oliverbj
Nov 12 at 21:03












For someone without images enabled, it's much less useful. "Right now I have below data: The difference is here that:..."
– miken32
Nov 12 at 21:05




For someone without images enabled, it's much less useful. "Right now I have below data: The difference is here that:..."
– miken32
Nov 12 at 21:05

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53269711%2fphp-laravel-combine-result-model-relationship%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53269711%2fphp-laravel-combine-result-model-relationship%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

鏡平學校

ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?