CosmosDBTrigger on Azure Function without Lease Collection












1














I have an Azure Function which is triggered each time that one on more items in my CosmosDb Collection is updated.



The code works correctly:



[StorageAccount("AzureWebJobsStorage")]
public static class ChangeFeedFunction
{
[FunctionName("ChangeFeedFunction")]
public static void ChangeFeedFunction(
[CosmosDBTrigger(
databaseName: "MyDataBase",
collectionName: "MyCollection",
ConnectionStringSetting = "CosmosDbConnectionString",
LeaseCollectionName = "MyCollection_Leases",
CreateLeaseCollectionIfNotExists = true
)] IReadOnlyList<Document> documents,
[Queue("collection-changes")] ICollector<Message> analystQueue,
ILogger logger
)
{
//Operations;
}


But in the case, it means I have 2 CosmosDb Collections (MyCollection and MyCollection_Leases) which is minimum 40$ per month. I would like to reduce the cost. Is there a way to observe the modification on my CosmosDb Collection without using another CosmosDb Collection?



Thanks










share|improve this question



























    1














    I have an Azure Function which is triggered each time that one on more items in my CosmosDb Collection is updated.



    The code works correctly:



    [StorageAccount("AzureWebJobsStorage")]
    public static class ChangeFeedFunction
    {
    [FunctionName("ChangeFeedFunction")]
    public static void ChangeFeedFunction(
    [CosmosDBTrigger(
    databaseName: "MyDataBase",
    collectionName: "MyCollection",
    ConnectionStringSetting = "CosmosDbConnectionString",
    LeaseCollectionName = "MyCollection_Leases",
    CreateLeaseCollectionIfNotExists = true
    )] IReadOnlyList<Document> documents,
    [Queue("collection-changes")] ICollector<Message> analystQueue,
    ILogger logger
    )
    {
    //Operations;
    }


    But in the case, it means I have 2 CosmosDb Collections (MyCollection and MyCollection_Leases) which is minimum 40$ per month. I would like to reduce the cost. Is there a way to observe the modification on my CosmosDb Collection without using another CosmosDb Collection?



    Thanks










    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1







      I have an Azure Function which is triggered each time that one on more items in my CosmosDb Collection is updated.



      The code works correctly:



      [StorageAccount("AzureWebJobsStorage")]
      public static class ChangeFeedFunction
      {
      [FunctionName("ChangeFeedFunction")]
      public static void ChangeFeedFunction(
      [CosmosDBTrigger(
      databaseName: "MyDataBase",
      collectionName: "MyCollection",
      ConnectionStringSetting = "CosmosDbConnectionString",
      LeaseCollectionName = "MyCollection_Leases",
      CreateLeaseCollectionIfNotExists = true
      )] IReadOnlyList<Document> documents,
      [Queue("collection-changes")] ICollector<Message> analystQueue,
      ILogger logger
      )
      {
      //Operations;
      }


      But in the case, it means I have 2 CosmosDb Collections (MyCollection and MyCollection_Leases) which is minimum 40$ per month. I would like to reduce the cost. Is there a way to observe the modification on my CosmosDb Collection without using another CosmosDb Collection?



      Thanks










      share|improve this question













      I have an Azure Function which is triggered each time that one on more items in my CosmosDb Collection is updated.



      The code works correctly:



      [StorageAccount("AzureWebJobsStorage")]
      public static class ChangeFeedFunction
      {
      [FunctionName("ChangeFeedFunction")]
      public static void ChangeFeedFunction(
      [CosmosDBTrigger(
      databaseName: "MyDataBase",
      collectionName: "MyCollection",
      ConnectionStringSetting = "CosmosDbConnectionString",
      LeaseCollectionName = "MyCollection_Leases",
      CreateLeaseCollectionIfNotExists = true
      )] IReadOnlyList<Document> documents,
      [Queue("collection-changes")] ICollector<Message> analystQueue,
      ILogger logger
      )
      {
      //Operations;
      }


      But in the case, it means I have 2 CosmosDb Collections (MyCollection and MyCollection_Leases) which is minimum 40$ per month. I would like to reduce the cost. Is there a way to observe the modification on my CosmosDb Collection without using another CosmosDb Collection?



      Thanks







      azure-functions azure-cosmosdb






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 14 '18 at 19:14









      Cedric Arnould

      336213




      336213
























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Following the cosmos db trigger function document, the lease collection can't be avoid so far because it bears important responsibility.



          We need one lease collection when using the Trigger to store the checkpoints for each Function. Let me say that if there are 10 documents were inserted into cosmos db, the trigger function was triggered one by one and the checkpoint moved with the process and stored into lease collection. Suddently, the trigger shut down resulted from some reasons. During this time, 5 more documents inserted into db. After the trigger function restarting, it knows from which node to continue the execution function with the checkpoint in lease collection.(I wish I had made it clear...)



          BTW,you could share one single lease collection for all of your collection for a more cost-effective approach. Please refer to this article.



          As for the cost,you could create the minimum configured lease collection. And the cost on the portal is estimated value. The price based on the consumption of RUs. Please refer to this document.






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for your answer!
            – Cedric Arnould
            Nov 15 '18 at 19:27










          • @CedricArnould You're welcome!
            – Jay Gong
            Nov 16 '18 at 1:27



















          0














          I would suggest scaling the database rather than the collection. If you scaled the database at 400 RU/s you can share that across collections.






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for your comment
            – Cedric Arnould
            2 days ago











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53307280%2fcosmosdbtrigger-on-azure-function-without-lease-collection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          Following the cosmos db trigger function document, the lease collection can't be avoid so far because it bears important responsibility.



          We need one lease collection when using the Trigger to store the checkpoints for each Function. Let me say that if there are 10 documents were inserted into cosmos db, the trigger function was triggered one by one and the checkpoint moved with the process and stored into lease collection. Suddently, the trigger shut down resulted from some reasons. During this time, 5 more documents inserted into db. After the trigger function restarting, it knows from which node to continue the execution function with the checkpoint in lease collection.(I wish I had made it clear...)



          BTW,you could share one single lease collection for all of your collection for a more cost-effective approach. Please refer to this article.



          As for the cost,you could create the minimum configured lease collection. And the cost on the portal is estimated value. The price based on the consumption of RUs. Please refer to this document.






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for your answer!
            – Cedric Arnould
            Nov 15 '18 at 19:27










          • @CedricArnould You're welcome!
            – Jay Gong
            Nov 16 '18 at 1:27
















          1














          Following the cosmos db trigger function document, the lease collection can't be avoid so far because it bears important responsibility.



          We need one lease collection when using the Trigger to store the checkpoints for each Function. Let me say that if there are 10 documents were inserted into cosmos db, the trigger function was triggered one by one and the checkpoint moved with the process and stored into lease collection. Suddently, the trigger shut down resulted from some reasons. During this time, 5 more documents inserted into db. After the trigger function restarting, it knows from which node to continue the execution function with the checkpoint in lease collection.(I wish I had made it clear...)



          BTW,you could share one single lease collection for all of your collection for a more cost-effective approach. Please refer to this article.



          As for the cost,you could create the minimum configured lease collection. And the cost on the portal is estimated value. The price based on the consumption of RUs. Please refer to this document.






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for your answer!
            – Cedric Arnould
            Nov 15 '18 at 19:27










          • @CedricArnould You're welcome!
            – Jay Gong
            Nov 16 '18 at 1:27














          1












          1








          1






          Following the cosmos db trigger function document, the lease collection can't be avoid so far because it bears important responsibility.



          We need one lease collection when using the Trigger to store the checkpoints for each Function. Let me say that if there are 10 documents were inserted into cosmos db, the trigger function was triggered one by one and the checkpoint moved with the process and stored into lease collection. Suddently, the trigger shut down resulted from some reasons. During this time, 5 more documents inserted into db. After the trigger function restarting, it knows from which node to continue the execution function with the checkpoint in lease collection.(I wish I had made it clear...)



          BTW,you could share one single lease collection for all of your collection for a more cost-effective approach. Please refer to this article.



          As for the cost,you could create the minimum configured lease collection. And the cost on the portal is estimated value. The price based on the consumption of RUs. Please refer to this document.






          share|improve this answer












          Following the cosmos db trigger function document, the lease collection can't be avoid so far because it bears important responsibility.



          We need one lease collection when using the Trigger to store the checkpoints for each Function. Let me say that if there are 10 documents were inserted into cosmos db, the trigger function was triggered one by one and the checkpoint moved with the process and stored into lease collection. Suddently, the trigger shut down resulted from some reasons. During this time, 5 more documents inserted into db. After the trigger function restarting, it knows from which node to continue the execution function with the checkpoint in lease collection.(I wish I had made it clear...)



          BTW,you could share one single lease collection for all of your collection for a more cost-effective approach. Please refer to this article.



          As for the cost,you could create the minimum configured lease collection. And the cost on the portal is estimated value. The price based on the consumption of RUs. Please refer to this document.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 15 '18 at 2:01









          Jay Gong

          8,0061512




          8,0061512












          • Thanks for your answer!
            – Cedric Arnould
            Nov 15 '18 at 19:27










          • @CedricArnould You're welcome!
            – Jay Gong
            Nov 16 '18 at 1:27


















          • Thanks for your answer!
            – Cedric Arnould
            Nov 15 '18 at 19:27










          • @CedricArnould You're welcome!
            – Jay Gong
            Nov 16 '18 at 1:27
















          Thanks for your answer!
          – Cedric Arnould
          Nov 15 '18 at 19:27




          Thanks for your answer!
          – Cedric Arnould
          Nov 15 '18 at 19:27












          @CedricArnould You're welcome!
          – Jay Gong
          Nov 16 '18 at 1:27




          @CedricArnould You're welcome!
          – Jay Gong
          Nov 16 '18 at 1:27













          0














          I would suggest scaling the database rather than the collection. If you scaled the database at 400 RU/s you can share that across collections.






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for your comment
            – Cedric Arnould
            2 days ago
















          0














          I would suggest scaling the database rather than the collection. If you scaled the database at 400 RU/s you can share that across collections.






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for your comment
            – Cedric Arnould
            2 days ago














          0












          0








          0






          I would suggest scaling the database rather than the collection. If you scaled the database at 400 RU/s you can share that across collections.






          share|improve this answer












          I would suggest scaling the database rather than the collection. If you scaled the database at 400 RU/s you can share that across collections.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Jan 3 at 21:26









          Dillorscroft

          143129




          143129












          • Thanks for your comment
            – Cedric Arnould
            2 days ago


















          • Thanks for your comment
            – Cedric Arnould
            2 days ago
















          Thanks for your comment
          – Cedric Arnould
          2 days ago




          Thanks for your comment
          – Cedric Arnould
          2 days ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53307280%2fcosmosdbtrigger-on-azure-function-without-lease-collection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          鏡平學校

          ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

          Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?