Memory usage of imputation with mice in R












0















I am currently working on the imputation of 10 large datasets (by first creating a prediction matrix with correlation of 0.3, dfpred03) with mice in R and I am having a lot of issues like the following:



imptest <- mice(df, m=1, maxit = 1, method='cart',predictorMatrix=dfpred03)

iter imp variable
1 1 VAR1 VAR2 VAR3 VAR4Error: cannot allocate vector of size 446 Kb
Error during wrapup: cannot allocate vector of size 3.6 Mb


I understand I will have to make some concessions, but because I am not sure what the bottleneck is I do not really know which concessions to make.



Is there any documentation about how mice in R uses data?



My most important questions:




  1. EDITED: How can I adapt the predictor matrix in order to make the imputation process less memory consuming? I am thinking of setting variables which have both low row and column sums to zero, but then I get left with NA's. Another thing I could do is to remove those variables and other variables with low observations.


  2. If I succeed in doing one iteration of a dataset, would that mean that I can increase maxit and m because the maximum memory usage is in the iteration?


  3. Is most memory used because of the amount of predictors or the amount of missingness in observations (and therefore the amount of observations)?


  4. More generally, where does the spike in memory usage lie?











share|improve this question

























  • I think that it will take more memory, due to the way r manages matrices and data frame while sorting calculations, than it will just running the full matrix to completion.

    – sconfluentus
    Nov 18 '18 at 17:28











  • Thank you for your comment! I tried and I think you are right.. So I guess it would be better to remove parts of the dataset all together (for which there are few predictors or many entries missing)?

    – Tom
    Nov 18 '18 at 17:34













  • Is there anything else living in memory when you are doing this? If you save all your variable and data in .rdata( ) then rm() EVERYTHING from the environment and use gc(). Close all other applications. It will free up as much memory as possible

    – sconfluentus
    Nov 18 '18 at 17:40











  • No, everything else is removed, as per your suggestion. That's why I have to figure out other options..

    – Tom
    Nov 18 '18 at 17:46
















0















I am currently working on the imputation of 10 large datasets (by first creating a prediction matrix with correlation of 0.3, dfpred03) with mice in R and I am having a lot of issues like the following:



imptest <- mice(df, m=1, maxit = 1, method='cart',predictorMatrix=dfpred03)

iter imp variable
1 1 VAR1 VAR2 VAR3 VAR4Error: cannot allocate vector of size 446 Kb
Error during wrapup: cannot allocate vector of size 3.6 Mb


I understand I will have to make some concessions, but because I am not sure what the bottleneck is I do not really know which concessions to make.



Is there any documentation about how mice in R uses data?



My most important questions:




  1. EDITED: How can I adapt the predictor matrix in order to make the imputation process less memory consuming? I am thinking of setting variables which have both low row and column sums to zero, but then I get left with NA's. Another thing I could do is to remove those variables and other variables with low observations.


  2. If I succeed in doing one iteration of a dataset, would that mean that I can increase maxit and m because the maximum memory usage is in the iteration?


  3. Is most memory used because of the amount of predictors or the amount of missingness in observations (and therefore the amount of observations)?


  4. More generally, where does the spike in memory usage lie?











share|improve this question

























  • I think that it will take more memory, due to the way r manages matrices and data frame while sorting calculations, than it will just running the full matrix to completion.

    – sconfluentus
    Nov 18 '18 at 17:28











  • Thank you for your comment! I tried and I think you are right.. So I guess it would be better to remove parts of the dataset all together (for which there are few predictors or many entries missing)?

    – Tom
    Nov 18 '18 at 17:34













  • Is there anything else living in memory when you are doing this? If you save all your variable and data in .rdata( ) then rm() EVERYTHING from the environment and use gc(). Close all other applications. It will free up as much memory as possible

    – sconfluentus
    Nov 18 '18 at 17:40











  • No, everything else is removed, as per your suggestion. That's why I have to figure out other options..

    – Tom
    Nov 18 '18 at 17:46














0












0








0








I am currently working on the imputation of 10 large datasets (by first creating a prediction matrix with correlation of 0.3, dfpred03) with mice in R and I am having a lot of issues like the following:



imptest <- mice(df, m=1, maxit = 1, method='cart',predictorMatrix=dfpred03)

iter imp variable
1 1 VAR1 VAR2 VAR3 VAR4Error: cannot allocate vector of size 446 Kb
Error during wrapup: cannot allocate vector of size 3.6 Mb


I understand I will have to make some concessions, but because I am not sure what the bottleneck is I do not really know which concessions to make.



Is there any documentation about how mice in R uses data?



My most important questions:




  1. EDITED: How can I adapt the predictor matrix in order to make the imputation process less memory consuming? I am thinking of setting variables which have both low row and column sums to zero, but then I get left with NA's. Another thing I could do is to remove those variables and other variables with low observations.


  2. If I succeed in doing one iteration of a dataset, would that mean that I can increase maxit and m because the maximum memory usage is in the iteration?


  3. Is most memory used because of the amount of predictors or the amount of missingness in observations (and therefore the amount of observations)?


  4. More generally, where does the spike in memory usage lie?











share|improve this question
















I am currently working on the imputation of 10 large datasets (by first creating a prediction matrix with correlation of 0.3, dfpred03) with mice in R and I am having a lot of issues like the following:



imptest <- mice(df, m=1, maxit = 1, method='cart',predictorMatrix=dfpred03)

iter imp variable
1 1 VAR1 VAR2 VAR3 VAR4Error: cannot allocate vector of size 446 Kb
Error during wrapup: cannot allocate vector of size 3.6 Mb


I understand I will have to make some concessions, but because I am not sure what the bottleneck is I do not really know which concessions to make.



Is there any documentation about how mice in R uses data?



My most important questions:




  1. EDITED: How can I adapt the predictor matrix in order to make the imputation process less memory consuming? I am thinking of setting variables which have both low row and column sums to zero, but then I get left with NA's. Another thing I could do is to remove those variables and other variables with low observations.


  2. If I succeed in doing one iteration of a dataset, would that mean that I can increase maxit and m because the maximum memory usage is in the iteration?


  3. Is most memory used because of the amount of predictors or the amount of missingness in observations (and therefore the amount of observations)?


  4. More generally, where does the spike in memory usage lie?








r memory out-of-memory imputation r-mice






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 19 '18 at 9:31







Tom

















asked Nov 18 '18 at 11:49









TomTom

343111




343111













  • I think that it will take more memory, due to the way r manages matrices and data frame while sorting calculations, than it will just running the full matrix to completion.

    – sconfluentus
    Nov 18 '18 at 17:28











  • Thank you for your comment! I tried and I think you are right.. So I guess it would be better to remove parts of the dataset all together (for which there are few predictors or many entries missing)?

    – Tom
    Nov 18 '18 at 17:34













  • Is there anything else living in memory when you are doing this? If you save all your variable and data in .rdata( ) then rm() EVERYTHING from the environment and use gc(). Close all other applications. It will free up as much memory as possible

    – sconfluentus
    Nov 18 '18 at 17:40











  • No, everything else is removed, as per your suggestion. That's why I have to figure out other options..

    – Tom
    Nov 18 '18 at 17:46



















  • I think that it will take more memory, due to the way r manages matrices and data frame while sorting calculations, than it will just running the full matrix to completion.

    – sconfluentus
    Nov 18 '18 at 17:28











  • Thank you for your comment! I tried and I think you are right.. So I guess it would be better to remove parts of the dataset all together (for which there are few predictors or many entries missing)?

    – Tom
    Nov 18 '18 at 17:34













  • Is there anything else living in memory when you are doing this? If you save all your variable and data in .rdata( ) then rm() EVERYTHING from the environment and use gc(). Close all other applications. It will free up as much memory as possible

    – sconfluentus
    Nov 18 '18 at 17:40











  • No, everything else is removed, as per your suggestion. That's why I have to figure out other options..

    – Tom
    Nov 18 '18 at 17:46

















I think that it will take more memory, due to the way r manages matrices and data frame while sorting calculations, than it will just running the full matrix to completion.

– sconfluentus
Nov 18 '18 at 17:28





I think that it will take more memory, due to the way r manages matrices and data frame while sorting calculations, than it will just running the full matrix to completion.

– sconfluentus
Nov 18 '18 at 17:28













Thank you for your comment! I tried and I think you are right.. So I guess it would be better to remove parts of the dataset all together (for which there are few predictors or many entries missing)?

– Tom
Nov 18 '18 at 17:34







Thank you for your comment! I tried and I think you are right.. So I guess it would be better to remove parts of the dataset all together (for which there are few predictors or many entries missing)?

– Tom
Nov 18 '18 at 17:34















Is there anything else living in memory when you are doing this? If you save all your variable and data in .rdata( ) then rm() EVERYTHING from the environment and use gc(). Close all other applications. It will free up as much memory as possible

– sconfluentus
Nov 18 '18 at 17:40





Is there anything else living in memory when you are doing this? If you save all your variable and data in .rdata( ) then rm() EVERYTHING from the environment and use gc(). Close all other applications. It will free up as much memory as possible

– sconfluentus
Nov 18 '18 at 17:40













No, everything else is removed, as per your suggestion. That's why I have to figure out other options..

– Tom
Nov 18 '18 at 17:46





No, everything else is removed, as per your suggestion. That's why I have to figure out other options..

– Tom
Nov 18 '18 at 17:46












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53360523%2fmemory-usage-of-imputation-with-mice-in-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53360523%2fmemory-usage-of-imputation-with-mice-in-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

鏡平學校

ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?