Transacting API for Datomic












3















Certainly a dumb question, but hopefully should clear things up.



I am following along https://docs.datomic.com/on-prem/getting-started/transact-schema.html, and the step to transact the schema, in this tutorial, is



user=> (d/transact conn {:tx-data movie-schema})


However, when I try this, I get



ClassCastException clojure.lang.PersistentArrayMap cannot be cast to java.util.List  datomic.api/transact 


Instead, when I just do



(d/transact conn schema)


it works for me. Is the tutorial missing some subtlety here? Am I missing something? (the only difference is that I'm using the Free version instead of the Starter Pro version).



Edit: the initial version of this post mentioned the schema, but this is generally true for just adding new facts too (i.e. using {:tx-data foo} doesn't work, but just using foo does).










share|improve this question

























  • I've noticed another inconsistency: while my toy example now works (yay), the result is a hash-set, while the result in the tutorial is a vector; not sure what to make of this.

    – agam
    Nov 4 '18 at 8:51
















3















Certainly a dumb question, but hopefully should clear things up.



I am following along https://docs.datomic.com/on-prem/getting-started/transact-schema.html, and the step to transact the schema, in this tutorial, is



user=> (d/transact conn {:tx-data movie-schema})


However, when I try this, I get



ClassCastException clojure.lang.PersistentArrayMap cannot be cast to java.util.List  datomic.api/transact 


Instead, when I just do



(d/transact conn schema)


it works for me. Is the tutorial missing some subtlety here? Am I missing something? (the only difference is that I'm using the Free version instead of the Starter Pro version).



Edit: the initial version of this post mentioned the schema, but this is generally true for just adding new facts too (i.e. using {:tx-data foo} doesn't work, but just using foo does).










share|improve this question

























  • I've noticed another inconsistency: while my toy example now works (yay), the result is a hash-set, while the result in the tutorial is a vector; not sure what to make of this.

    – agam
    Nov 4 '18 at 8:51














3












3








3








Certainly a dumb question, but hopefully should clear things up.



I am following along https://docs.datomic.com/on-prem/getting-started/transact-schema.html, and the step to transact the schema, in this tutorial, is



user=> (d/transact conn {:tx-data movie-schema})


However, when I try this, I get



ClassCastException clojure.lang.PersistentArrayMap cannot be cast to java.util.List  datomic.api/transact 


Instead, when I just do



(d/transact conn schema)


it works for me. Is the tutorial missing some subtlety here? Am I missing something? (the only difference is that I'm using the Free version instead of the Starter Pro version).



Edit: the initial version of this post mentioned the schema, but this is generally true for just adding new facts too (i.e. using {:tx-data foo} doesn't work, but just using foo does).










share|improve this question
















Certainly a dumb question, but hopefully should clear things up.



I am following along https://docs.datomic.com/on-prem/getting-started/transact-schema.html, and the step to transact the schema, in this tutorial, is



user=> (d/transact conn {:tx-data movie-schema})


However, when I try this, I get



ClassCastException clojure.lang.PersistentArrayMap cannot be cast to java.util.List  datomic.api/transact 


Instead, when I just do



(d/transact conn schema)


it works for me. Is the tutorial missing some subtlety here? Am I missing something? (the only difference is that I'm using the Free version instead of the Starter Pro version).



Edit: the initial version of this post mentioned the schema, but this is generally true for just adding new facts too (i.e. using {:tx-data foo} doesn't work, but just using foo does).







clojure datomic






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 4 '18 at 8:47







agam

















asked Nov 4 '18 at 8:37









agamagam

1,40451623




1,40451623













  • I've noticed another inconsistency: while my toy example now works (yay), the result is a hash-set, while the result in the tutorial is a vector; not sure what to make of this.

    – agam
    Nov 4 '18 at 8:51



















  • I've noticed another inconsistency: while my toy example now works (yay), the result is a hash-set, while the result in the tutorial is a vector; not sure what to make of this.

    – agam
    Nov 4 '18 at 8:51

















I've noticed another inconsistency: while my toy example now works (yay), the result is a hash-set, while the result in the tutorial is a vector; not sure what to make of this.

– agam
Nov 4 '18 at 8:51





I've noticed another inconsistency: while my toy example now works (yay), the result is a hash-set, while the result in the tutorial is a vector; not sure what to make of this.

– agam
Nov 4 '18 at 8:51












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














I think the cause of your problem here is an inconsistency between the Peer API (in which transact accepts a list) and the Client API (in which transact accepts a map containing a :tx-data key). I suspect you tried to run your REPL commands in the REPL of a Peer process, whereas the tutorial you linked to expects you to run commands in the REPL of a Client process.



Why the inconsistency between Peers and Clients? Not being part of the Datomic team, I can only speculate:




  1. The Peer API was designed before the Client API historically, at which time the 'transaction requests as lists' format was sufficient

  2. When the Client API was designed, because of the more expensive nature of calling d/transact (I believe it incurs an additional I/O roundtrip from client to server), the authors left room for additional data in transaction requests (e.g for templating), hence the more extensible map-based format.






share|improve this answer
























  • That makes sense! I'm not sure why I ended up in the REPL of the "wrong" process, but this would explain the inconsistency I observed.

    – agam
    Nov 18 '18 at 19:14



















1














You can see a working demo here: https://github.com/cloojure/tupelo-datomic



Just clone the repo and run the tests:



~/tupelo-datomic > lein test

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic._bootstrap

----------------------------------
Clojure 1.9.0 Java 10.0.1
----------------------------------

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.bond

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.bond-query

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.core

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.find

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.functionality

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.quick-start
:using-local

Ran 17 tests containing 110 assertions.
0 failures, 0 errors.
~/tupelo-datomic >




Regarding your specific question, I have only used :tx-data as a field from the output of Datomic operations. I have never used it as a field from input data. It is possible that the docs you reference are incorrect or out of date.



Here is an example (note the parens instead of curly braces):



https://github.com/cloojure/tupelo-datomic/blob/master/src/tupelo_datomic/core.clj#L540





For more detail, you can see the native Datomic function call as the output of the wrapper function new-attribute in the unit tests: https://github.com/cloojure/tupelo-datomic/blob/master/test/tst/tupelo_datomic/core.clj#L46



  (let [result (td/new-attribute
:weapon/type :db.type/keyword
:db.unique/value :db.unique/identity :db.cardinality/one :db.cardinality/many
:db/index :db/fulltext :db/isComponent :db/noHistory)]
(is (s/validate datomic.db.DbId (:db/id result)))
(is (wild-match? {:db/id :*
:db/ident :weapon/type
:db/index true
:db/unique :db.unique/identity
:db/noHistory true
:db/cardinality :db.cardinality/many
:db/isComponent true
:db.install/_attribute :db.part/db
:db/fulltext true
:db/valueType :db.type/keyword}
result)))





share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks, my (surprising?) conclusion is that everything works (and works well!) but the docs were out of date.

    – agam
    Nov 5 '18 at 19:29











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53139065%2ftransacting-api-for-datomic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














I think the cause of your problem here is an inconsistency between the Peer API (in which transact accepts a list) and the Client API (in which transact accepts a map containing a :tx-data key). I suspect you tried to run your REPL commands in the REPL of a Peer process, whereas the tutorial you linked to expects you to run commands in the REPL of a Client process.



Why the inconsistency between Peers and Clients? Not being part of the Datomic team, I can only speculate:




  1. The Peer API was designed before the Client API historically, at which time the 'transaction requests as lists' format was sufficient

  2. When the Client API was designed, because of the more expensive nature of calling d/transact (I believe it incurs an additional I/O roundtrip from client to server), the authors left room for additional data in transaction requests (e.g for templating), hence the more extensible map-based format.






share|improve this answer
























  • That makes sense! I'm not sure why I ended up in the REPL of the "wrong" process, but this would explain the inconsistency I observed.

    – agam
    Nov 18 '18 at 19:14
















1














I think the cause of your problem here is an inconsistency between the Peer API (in which transact accepts a list) and the Client API (in which transact accepts a map containing a :tx-data key). I suspect you tried to run your REPL commands in the REPL of a Peer process, whereas the tutorial you linked to expects you to run commands in the REPL of a Client process.



Why the inconsistency between Peers and Clients? Not being part of the Datomic team, I can only speculate:




  1. The Peer API was designed before the Client API historically, at which time the 'transaction requests as lists' format was sufficient

  2. When the Client API was designed, because of the more expensive nature of calling d/transact (I believe it incurs an additional I/O roundtrip from client to server), the authors left room for additional data in transaction requests (e.g for templating), hence the more extensible map-based format.






share|improve this answer
























  • That makes sense! I'm not sure why I ended up in the REPL of the "wrong" process, but this would explain the inconsistency I observed.

    – agam
    Nov 18 '18 at 19:14














1












1








1







I think the cause of your problem here is an inconsistency between the Peer API (in which transact accepts a list) and the Client API (in which transact accepts a map containing a :tx-data key). I suspect you tried to run your REPL commands in the REPL of a Peer process, whereas the tutorial you linked to expects you to run commands in the REPL of a Client process.



Why the inconsistency between Peers and Clients? Not being part of the Datomic team, I can only speculate:




  1. The Peer API was designed before the Client API historically, at which time the 'transaction requests as lists' format was sufficient

  2. When the Client API was designed, because of the more expensive nature of calling d/transact (I believe it incurs an additional I/O roundtrip from client to server), the authors left room for additional data in transaction requests (e.g for templating), hence the more extensible map-based format.






share|improve this answer













I think the cause of your problem here is an inconsistency between the Peer API (in which transact accepts a list) and the Client API (in which transact accepts a map containing a :tx-data key). I suspect you tried to run your REPL commands in the REPL of a Peer process, whereas the tutorial you linked to expects you to run commands in the REPL of a Client process.



Why the inconsistency between Peers and Clients? Not being part of the Datomic team, I can only speculate:




  1. The Peer API was designed before the Client API historically, at which time the 'transaction requests as lists' format was sufficient

  2. When the Client API was designed, because of the more expensive nature of calling d/transact (I believe it incurs an additional I/O roundtrip from client to server), the authors left room for additional data in transaction requests (e.g for templating), hence the more extensible map-based format.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 18 '18 at 12:06









Valentin WaeselynckValentin Waeselynck

4,3231938




4,3231938













  • That makes sense! I'm not sure why I ended up in the REPL of the "wrong" process, but this would explain the inconsistency I observed.

    – agam
    Nov 18 '18 at 19:14



















  • That makes sense! I'm not sure why I ended up in the REPL of the "wrong" process, but this would explain the inconsistency I observed.

    – agam
    Nov 18 '18 at 19:14

















That makes sense! I'm not sure why I ended up in the REPL of the "wrong" process, but this would explain the inconsistency I observed.

– agam
Nov 18 '18 at 19:14





That makes sense! I'm not sure why I ended up in the REPL of the "wrong" process, but this would explain the inconsistency I observed.

– agam
Nov 18 '18 at 19:14













1














You can see a working demo here: https://github.com/cloojure/tupelo-datomic



Just clone the repo and run the tests:



~/tupelo-datomic > lein test

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic._bootstrap

----------------------------------
Clojure 1.9.0 Java 10.0.1
----------------------------------

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.bond

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.bond-query

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.core

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.find

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.functionality

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.quick-start
:using-local

Ran 17 tests containing 110 assertions.
0 failures, 0 errors.
~/tupelo-datomic >




Regarding your specific question, I have only used :tx-data as a field from the output of Datomic operations. I have never used it as a field from input data. It is possible that the docs you reference are incorrect or out of date.



Here is an example (note the parens instead of curly braces):



https://github.com/cloojure/tupelo-datomic/blob/master/src/tupelo_datomic/core.clj#L540





For more detail, you can see the native Datomic function call as the output of the wrapper function new-attribute in the unit tests: https://github.com/cloojure/tupelo-datomic/blob/master/test/tst/tupelo_datomic/core.clj#L46



  (let [result (td/new-attribute
:weapon/type :db.type/keyword
:db.unique/value :db.unique/identity :db.cardinality/one :db.cardinality/many
:db/index :db/fulltext :db/isComponent :db/noHistory)]
(is (s/validate datomic.db.DbId (:db/id result)))
(is (wild-match? {:db/id :*
:db/ident :weapon/type
:db/index true
:db/unique :db.unique/identity
:db/noHistory true
:db/cardinality :db.cardinality/many
:db/isComponent true
:db.install/_attribute :db.part/db
:db/fulltext true
:db/valueType :db.type/keyword}
result)))





share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks, my (surprising?) conclusion is that everything works (and works well!) but the docs were out of date.

    – agam
    Nov 5 '18 at 19:29
















1














You can see a working demo here: https://github.com/cloojure/tupelo-datomic



Just clone the repo and run the tests:



~/tupelo-datomic > lein test

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic._bootstrap

----------------------------------
Clojure 1.9.0 Java 10.0.1
----------------------------------

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.bond

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.bond-query

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.core

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.find

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.functionality

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.quick-start
:using-local

Ran 17 tests containing 110 assertions.
0 failures, 0 errors.
~/tupelo-datomic >




Regarding your specific question, I have only used :tx-data as a field from the output of Datomic operations. I have never used it as a field from input data. It is possible that the docs you reference are incorrect or out of date.



Here is an example (note the parens instead of curly braces):



https://github.com/cloojure/tupelo-datomic/blob/master/src/tupelo_datomic/core.clj#L540





For more detail, you can see the native Datomic function call as the output of the wrapper function new-attribute in the unit tests: https://github.com/cloojure/tupelo-datomic/blob/master/test/tst/tupelo_datomic/core.clj#L46



  (let [result (td/new-attribute
:weapon/type :db.type/keyword
:db.unique/value :db.unique/identity :db.cardinality/one :db.cardinality/many
:db/index :db/fulltext :db/isComponent :db/noHistory)]
(is (s/validate datomic.db.DbId (:db/id result)))
(is (wild-match? {:db/id :*
:db/ident :weapon/type
:db/index true
:db/unique :db.unique/identity
:db/noHistory true
:db/cardinality :db.cardinality/many
:db/isComponent true
:db.install/_attribute :db.part/db
:db/fulltext true
:db/valueType :db.type/keyword}
result)))





share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks, my (surprising?) conclusion is that everything works (and works well!) but the docs were out of date.

    – agam
    Nov 5 '18 at 19:29














1












1








1







You can see a working demo here: https://github.com/cloojure/tupelo-datomic



Just clone the repo and run the tests:



~/tupelo-datomic > lein test

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic._bootstrap

----------------------------------
Clojure 1.9.0 Java 10.0.1
----------------------------------

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.bond

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.bond-query

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.core

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.find

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.functionality

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.quick-start
:using-local

Ran 17 tests containing 110 assertions.
0 failures, 0 errors.
~/tupelo-datomic >




Regarding your specific question, I have only used :tx-data as a field from the output of Datomic operations. I have never used it as a field from input data. It is possible that the docs you reference are incorrect or out of date.



Here is an example (note the parens instead of curly braces):



https://github.com/cloojure/tupelo-datomic/blob/master/src/tupelo_datomic/core.clj#L540





For more detail, you can see the native Datomic function call as the output of the wrapper function new-attribute in the unit tests: https://github.com/cloojure/tupelo-datomic/blob/master/test/tst/tupelo_datomic/core.clj#L46



  (let [result (td/new-attribute
:weapon/type :db.type/keyword
:db.unique/value :db.unique/identity :db.cardinality/one :db.cardinality/many
:db/index :db/fulltext :db/isComponent :db/noHistory)]
(is (s/validate datomic.db.DbId (:db/id result)))
(is (wild-match? {:db/id :*
:db/ident :weapon/type
:db/index true
:db/unique :db.unique/identity
:db/noHistory true
:db/cardinality :db.cardinality/many
:db/isComponent true
:db.install/_attribute :db.part/db
:db/fulltext true
:db/valueType :db.type/keyword}
result)))





share|improve this answer















You can see a working demo here: https://github.com/cloojure/tupelo-datomic



Just clone the repo and run the tests:



~/tupelo-datomic > lein test

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic._bootstrap

----------------------------------
Clojure 1.9.0 Java 10.0.1
----------------------------------

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.bond

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.bond-query

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.core

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.find

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.functionality

lein test tst.tupelo-datomic.quick-start
:using-local

Ran 17 tests containing 110 assertions.
0 failures, 0 errors.
~/tupelo-datomic >




Regarding your specific question, I have only used :tx-data as a field from the output of Datomic operations. I have never used it as a field from input data. It is possible that the docs you reference are incorrect or out of date.



Here is an example (note the parens instead of curly braces):



https://github.com/cloojure/tupelo-datomic/blob/master/src/tupelo_datomic/core.clj#L540





For more detail, you can see the native Datomic function call as the output of the wrapper function new-attribute in the unit tests: https://github.com/cloojure/tupelo-datomic/blob/master/test/tst/tupelo_datomic/core.clj#L46



  (let [result (td/new-attribute
:weapon/type :db.type/keyword
:db.unique/value :db.unique/identity :db.cardinality/one :db.cardinality/many
:db/index :db/fulltext :db/isComponent :db/noHistory)]
(is (s/validate datomic.db.DbId (:db/id result)))
(is (wild-match? {:db/id :*
:db/ident :weapon/type
:db/index true
:db/unique :db.unique/identity
:db/noHistory true
:db/cardinality :db.cardinality/many
:db/isComponent true
:db.install/_attribute :db.part/db
:db/fulltext true
:db/valueType :db.type/keyword}
result)))






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 4 '18 at 17:33

























answered Nov 4 '18 at 15:24









Alan ThompsonAlan Thompson

13.4k22533




13.4k22533













  • Thanks, my (surprising?) conclusion is that everything works (and works well!) but the docs were out of date.

    – agam
    Nov 5 '18 at 19:29



















  • Thanks, my (surprising?) conclusion is that everything works (and works well!) but the docs were out of date.

    – agam
    Nov 5 '18 at 19:29

















Thanks, my (surprising?) conclusion is that everything works (and works well!) but the docs were out of date.

– agam
Nov 5 '18 at 19:29





Thanks, my (surprising?) conclusion is that everything works (and works well!) but the docs were out of date.

– agam
Nov 5 '18 at 19:29


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53139065%2ftransacting-api-for-datomic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

鏡平學校

ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?