Imputation model for time series missing data in R












0















Time series data consists of:



Product (categorical); ProductGroup (categorical); Country (categorical); YearSinceProductLaunch (numeric); SalesAtLaunchYear (numeric)



Only "SalesAtLaunchYear" data has some missing values which needs to be imputed.



For some products, there is complete data, i.e. sales data exists for the launch year 1,2 and up to now.



Some other products, however, contain missing sales data only for the early years since launch. Products have different age, therefore sometimes there are 2 years since launch that are missing, sometimes there are 10 years, which depends on the product.



I am interested to find a model in R that can impute the missing time series data gaps. I have tried MICE by setting the model for "SalesAtLaunchYear" as random forest, but I am still getting some very high values of sales especially at the beginning of the product's launch. I am ensuring that at Year 0, all sales are 0 to avoid negative values. The data frame has 20000 rows with 300 unique products.



testdf = tibble::tribble(
~Country, ~ProductGroup, ~Product, ~YearSinceProductLaunch, ~SalesAtLaunchYear,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 0L, 0,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 1L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 2L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 3L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 4L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 5L, 206034.9814,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 6L, 170143.2623,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 7L, 212541.9306,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 8L, 270663.199,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 9L, 736738.3755,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 10L, 2579723.981,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 11L, 4964319.496,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 12L, 6864985.16,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 13L, 8793292.386,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 14L, 11416033.38,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 0L, 0,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 1L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 2L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 3L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 4L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 5L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 6L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 7L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 8L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 9L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 10L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 11L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 12L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 13L, 30806222.96,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 14L, 31456272,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 15L, 31853476.78,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 16L, 30379818,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 17L, 29765448.87,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 18L, 31376234,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 19L, 32628514.81,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 20L, 32732196,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 21L, 33503784.25,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 22L, 35163372,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 0L, 0,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 1L, 161884.081,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 2L, 7876925.474,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 3L, 12948209.55,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 4L, 13304401.76
)


testdf$Country = as.factor(testdf$Country)
testdf$ProductGroup = as.factor(testdf$ProductGroup)
testdf$Product = as.factor(testdf$Product)









share|improve this question




















  • 1





    This question would be better with some data

    – Gabriel Devillers
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:03











  • Could you make your problem reproducible by sharing a sample of your data so others can help (please do not use str(), head() or screenshot)? You can use the reprex and datapasta packages to assist you with that. See also Help me Help you & How to make a great R reproducible example?

    – Tung
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:50











  • I have put test data.

    – aza07
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:48
















0















Time series data consists of:



Product (categorical); ProductGroup (categorical); Country (categorical); YearSinceProductLaunch (numeric); SalesAtLaunchYear (numeric)



Only "SalesAtLaunchYear" data has some missing values which needs to be imputed.



For some products, there is complete data, i.e. sales data exists for the launch year 1,2 and up to now.



Some other products, however, contain missing sales data only for the early years since launch. Products have different age, therefore sometimes there are 2 years since launch that are missing, sometimes there are 10 years, which depends on the product.



I am interested to find a model in R that can impute the missing time series data gaps. I have tried MICE by setting the model for "SalesAtLaunchYear" as random forest, but I am still getting some very high values of sales especially at the beginning of the product's launch. I am ensuring that at Year 0, all sales are 0 to avoid negative values. The data frame has 20000 rows with 300 unique products.



testdf = tibble::tribble(
~Country, ~ProductGroup, ~Product, ~YearSinceProductLaunch, ~SalesAtLaunchYear,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 0L, 0,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 1L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 2L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 3L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 4L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 5L, 206034.9814,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 6L, 170143.2623,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 7L, 212541.9306,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 8L, 270663.199,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 9L, 736738.3755,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 10L, 2579723.981,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 11L, 4964319.496,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 12L, 6864985.16,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 13L, 8793292.386,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 14L, 11416033.38,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 0L, 0,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 1L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 2L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 3L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 4L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 5L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 6L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 7L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 8L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 9L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 10L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 11L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 12L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 13L, 30806222.96,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 14L, 31456272,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 15L, 31853476.78,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 16L, 30379818,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 17L, 29765448.87,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 18L, 31376234,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 19L, 32628514.81,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 20L, 32732196,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 21L, 33503784.25,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 22L, 35163372,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 0L, 0,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 1L, 161884.081,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 2L, 7876925.474,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 3L, 12948209.55,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 4L, 13304401.76
)


testdf$Country = as.factor(testdf$Country)
testdf$ProductGroup = as.factor(testdf$ProductGroup)
testdf$Product = as.factor(testdf$Product)









share|improve this question




















  • 1





    This question would be better with some data

    – Gabriel Devillers
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:03











  • Could you make your problem reproducible by sharing a sample of your data so others can help (please do not use str(), head() or screenshot)? You can use the reprex and datapasta packages to assist you with that. See also Help me Help you & How to make a great R reproducible example?

    – Tung
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:50











  • I have put test data.

    – aza07
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:48














0












0








0








Time series data consists of:



Product (categorical); ProductGroup (categorical); Country (categorical); YearSinceProductLaunch (numeric); SalesAtLaunchYear (numeric)



Only "SalesAtLaunchYear" data has some missing values which needs to be imputed.



For some products, there is complete data, i.e. sales data exists for the launch year 1,2 and up to now.



Some other products, however, contain missing sales data only for the early years since launch. Products have different age, therefore sometimes there are 2 years since launch that are missing, sometimes there are 10 years, which depends on the product.



I am interested to find a model in R that can impute the missing time series data gaps. I have tried MICE by setting the model for "SalesAtLaunchYear" as random forest, but I am still getting some very high values of sales especially at the beginning of the product's launch. I am ensuring that at Year 0, all sales are 0 to avoid negative values. The data frame has 20000 rows with 300 unique products.



testdf = tibble::tribble(
~Country, ~ProductGroup, ~Product, ~YearSinceProductLaunch, ~SalesAtLaunchYear,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 0L, 0,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 1L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 2L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 3L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 4L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 5L, 206034.9814,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 6L, 170143.2623,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 7L, 212541.9306,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 8L, 270663.199,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 9L, 736738.3755,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 10L, 2579723.981,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 11L, 4964319.496,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 12L, 6864985.16,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 13L, 8793292.386,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 14L, 11416033.38,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 0L, 0,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 1L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 2L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 3L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 4L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 5L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 6L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 7L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 8L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 9L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 10L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 11L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 12L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 13L, 30806222.96,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 14L, 31456272,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 15L, 31853476.78,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 16L, 30379818,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 17L, 29765448.87,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 18L, 31376234,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 19L, 32628514.81,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 20L, 32732196,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 21L, 33503784.25,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 22L, 35163372,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 0L, 0,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 1L, 161884.081,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 2L, 7876925.474,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 3L, 12948209.55,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 4L, 13304401.76
)


testdf$Country = as.factor(testdf$Country)
testdf$ProductGroup = as.factor(testdf$ProductGroup)
testdf$Product = as.factor(testdf$Product)









share|improve this question
















Time series data consists of:



Product (categorical); ProductGroup (categorical); Country (categorical); YearSinceProductLaunch (numeric); SalesAtLaunchYear (numeric)



Only "SalesAtLaunchYear" data has some missing values which needs to be imputed.



For some products, there is complete data, i.e. sales data exists for the launch year 1,2 and up to now.



Some other products, however, contain missing sales data only for the early years since launch. Products have different age, therefore sometimes there are 2 years since launch that are missing, sometimes there are 10 years, which depends on the product.



I am interested to find a model in R that can impute the missing time series data gaps. I have tried MICE by setting the model for "SalesAtLaunchYear" as random forest, but I am still getting some very high values of sales especially at the beginning of the product's launch. I am ensuring that at Year 0, all sales are 0 to avoid negative values. The data frame has 20000 rows with 300 unique products.



testdf = tibble::tribble(
~Country, ~ProductGroup, ~Product, ~YearSinceProductLaunch, ~SalesAtLaunchYear,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 0L, 0,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 1L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 2L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 3L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 4L, NA,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 5L, 206034.9814,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 6L, 170143.2623,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 7L, 212541.9306,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 8L, 270663.199,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 9L, 736738.3755,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 10L, 2579723.981,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 11L, 4964319.496,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 12L, 6864985.16,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 13L, 8793292.386,
"CA", "ProductGroup1", "Product1", 14L, 11416033.38,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 0L, 0,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 1L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 2L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 3L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 4L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 5L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 6L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 7L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 8L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 9L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 10L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 11L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 12L, NA,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 13L, 30806222.96,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 14L, 31456272,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 15L, 31853476.78,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 16L, 30379818,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 17L, 29765448.87,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 18L, 31376234,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 19L, 32628514.81,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 20L, 32732196,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 21L, 33503784.25,
"IT", "ProductGroup2", "Product2", 22L, 35163372,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 0L, 0,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 1L, 161884.081,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 2L, 7876925.474,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 3L, 12948209.55,
"DE", "ProductGroup3", "Product3", 4L, 13304401.76
)


testdf$Country = as.factor(testdf$Country)
testdf$ProductGroup = as.factor(testdf$ProductGroup)
testdf$Product = as.factor(testdf$Product)






r time-series missing-data imputation r-mice






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 19 '18 at 21:36







aza07

















asked Nov 19 '18 at 17:15









aza07aza07

991313




991313








  • 1





    This question would be better with some data

    – Gabriel Devillers
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:03











  • Could you make your problem reproducible by sharing a sample of your data so others can help (please do not use str(), head() or screenshot)? You can use the reprex and datapasta packages to assist you with that. See also Help me Help you & How to make a great R reproducible example?

    – Tung
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:50











  • I have put test data.

    – aza07
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:48














  • 1





    This question would be better with some data

    – Gabriel Devillers
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:03











  • Could you make your problem reproducible by sharing a sample of your data so others can help (please do not use str(), head() or screenshot)? You can use the reprex and datapasta packages to assist you with that. See also Help me Help you & How to make a great R reproducible example?

    – Tung
    Nov 19 '18 at 19:50











  • I have put test data.

    – aza07
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:48








1




1





This question would be better with some data

– Gabriel Devillers
Nov 19 '18 at 19:03





This question would be better with some data

– Gabriel Devillers
Nov 19 '18 at 19:03













Could you make your problem reproducible by sharing a sample of your data so others can help (please do not use str(), head() or screenshot)? You can use the reprex and datapasta packages to assist you with that. See also Help me Help you & How to make a great R reproducible example?

– Tung
Nov 19 '18 at 19:50





Could you make your problem reproducible by sharing a sample of your data so others can help (please do not use str(), head() or screenshot)? You can use the reprex and datapasta packages to assist you with that. See also Help me Help you & How to make a great R reproducible example?

– Tung
Nov 19 '18 at 19:50













I have put test data.

– aza07
Nov 20 '18 at 9:48





I have put test data.

– aza07
Nov 20 '18 at 9:48












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Probably using mice will not give you the desired results. Since it mostly uses inter-variable correlations. You are looking more for correlations in time.



My recommendation for this specific example would be to split the dataset into Country, ProductGroup, Product groups and perform imputation on these with a time series imputation package.



Looking at your data I think something like the function na.interpolation from package imputeTS would already do a good job.



That is how you call it:



library("imputeTS")
na.interpolation(yourTimeSeries)


You would have to call it multiple times for each time series you created out of the each Country, ProductGroup, Product.



You can also just run



 na.interpolation(testdf$SalesAtLaunchYear)


On your whole dataset which is easier - in the example you showed this would also work. (might lead to problems if the rest is structured differently or you are using a different algorithm from imputeTS package)






share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks, I was already looking into this package, too. I will try and report results. I was wondering how to control within this library or using some other models the country effect and product group effect. To clarify, there is also some products for which sales for all years since launch are available, from which country growth can be learned.

    – aza07
    Nov 25 '18 at 19:46











  • I see, so there might be some inter-variable correlations you also can employ. You could try the package AMELIAII then. Chapter 4.6 / p.20 in the manual gives some hints on how to also consider the time aspects: cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Amelia/vignettes/amelia.pdf . It's only setting some parameters. I still would compare against results form e.g. imputeTS - often when the time correlations are way stronger than your inter-variable correlations you fare better with a sole time series imputation method.

    – stats0007
    Nov 26 '18 at 15:23











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53379636%2fimputation-model-for-time-series-missing-data-in-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














Probably using mice will not give you the desired results. Since it mostly uses inter-variable correlations. You are looking more for correlations in time.



My recommendation for this specific example would be to split the dataset into Country, ProductGroup, Product groups and perform imputation on these with a time series imputation package.



Looking at your data I think something like the function na.interpolation from package imputeTS would already do a good job.



That is how you call it:



library("imputeTS")
na.interpolation(yourTimeSeries)


You would have to call it multiple times for each time series you created out of the each Country, ProductGroup, Product.



You can also just run



 na.interpolation(testdf$SalesAtLaunchYear)


On your whole dataset which is easier - in the example you showed this would also work. (might lead to problems if the rest is structured differently or you are using a different algorithm from imputeTS package)






share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks, I was already looking into this package, too. I will try and report results. I was wondering how to control within this library or using some other models the country effect and product group effect. To clarify, there is also some products for which sales for all years since launch are available, from which country growth can be learned.

    – aza07
    Nov 25 '18 at 19:46











  • I see, so there might be some inter-variable correlations you also can employ. You could try the package AMELIAII then. Chapter 4.6 / p.20 in the manual gives some hints on how to also consider the time aspects: cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Amelia/vignettes/amelia.pdf . It's only setting some parameters. I still would compare against results form e.g. imputeTS - often when the time correlations are way stronger than your inter-variable correlations you fare better with a sole time series imputation method.

    – stats0007
    Nov 26 '18 at 15:23
















0














Probably using mice will not give you the desired results. Since it mostly uses inter-variable correlations. You are looking more for correlations in time.



My recommendation for this specific example would be to split the dataset into Country, ProductGroup, Product groups and perform imputation on these with a time series imputation package.



Looking at your data I think something like the function na.interpolation from package imputeTS would already do a good job.



That is how you call it:



library("imputeTS")
na.interpolation(yourTimeSeries)


You would have to call it multiple times for each time series you created out of the each Country, ProductGroup, Product.



You can also just run



 na.interpolation(testdf$SalesAtLaunchYear)


On your whole dataset which is easier - in the example you showed this would also work. (might lead to problems if the rest is structured differently or you are using a different algorithm from imputeTS package)






share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks, I was already looking into this package, too. I will try and report results. I was wondering how to control within this library or using some other models the country effect and product group effect. To clarify, there is also some products for which sales for all years since launch are available, from which country growth can be learned.

    – aza07
    Nov 25 '18 at 19:46











  • I see, so there might be some inter-variable correlations you also can employ. You could try the package AMELIAII then. Chapter 4.6 / p.20 in the manual gives some hints on how to also consider the time aspects: cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Amelia/vignettes/amelia.pdf . It's only setting some parameters. I still would compare against results form e.g. imputeTS - often when the time correlations are way stronger than your inter-variable correlations you fare better with a sole time series imputation method.

    – stats0007
    Nov 26 '18 at 15:23














0












0








0







Probably using mice will not give you the desired results. Since it mostly uses inter-variable correlations. You are looking more for correlations in time.



My recommendation for this specific example would be to split the dataset into Country, ProductGroup, Product groups and perform imputation on these with a time series imputation package.



Looking at your data I think something like the function na.interpolation from package imputeTS would already do a good job.



That is how you call it:



library("imputeTS")
na.interpolation(yourTimeSeries)


You would have to call it multiple times for each time series you created out of the each Country, ProductGroup, Product.



You can also just run



 na.interpolation(testdf$SalesAtLaunchYear)


On your whole dataset which is easier - in the example you showed this would also work. (might lead to problems if the rest is structured differently or you are using a different algorithm from imputeTS package)






share|improve this answer















Probably using mice will not give you the desired results. Since it mostly uses inter-variable correlations. You are looking more for correlations in time.



My recommendation for this specific example would be to split the dataset into Country, ProductGroup, Product groups and perform imputation on these with a time series imputation package.



Looking at your data I think something like the function na.interpolation from package imputeTS would already do a good job.



That is how you call it:



library("imputeTS")
na.interpolation(yourTimeSeries)


You would have to call it multiple times for each time series you created out of the each Country, ProductGroup, Product.



You can also just run



 na.interpolation(testdf$SalesAtLaunchYear)


On your whole dataset which is easier - in the example you showed this would also work. (might lead to problems if the rest is structured differently or you are using a different algorithm from imputeTS package)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 24 '18 at 7:08

























answered Nov 24 '18 at 6:59









stats0007stats0007

916626




916626













  • Thanks, I was already looking into this package, too. I will try and report results. I was wondering how to control within this library or using some other models the country effect and product group effect. To clarify, there is also some products for which sales for all years since launch are available, from which country growth can be learned.

    – aza07
    Nov 25 '18 at 19:46











  • I see, so there might be some inter-variable correlations you also can employ. You could try the package AMELIAII then. Chapter 4.6 / p.20 in the manual gives some hints on how to also consider the time aspects: cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Amelia/vignettes/amelia.pdf . It's only setting some parameters. I still would compare against results form e.g. imputeTS - often when the time correlations are way stronger than your inter-variable correlations you fare better with a sole time series imputation method.

    – stats0007
    Nov 26 '18 at 15:23



















  • Thanks, I was already looking into this package, too. I will try and report results. I was wondering how to control within this library or using some other models the country effect and product group effect. To clarify, there is also some products for which sales for all years since launch are available, from which country growth can be learned.

    – aza07
    Nov 25 '18 at 19:46











  • I see, so there might be some inter-variable correlations you also can employ. You could try the package AMELIAII then. Chapter 4.6 / p.20 in the manual gives some hints on how to also consider the time aspects: cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Amelia/vignettes/amelia.pdf . It's only setting some parameters. I still would compare against results form e.g. imputeTS - often when the time correlations are way stronger than your inter-variable correlations you fare better with a sole time series imputation method.

    – stats0007
    Nov 26 '18 at 15:23

















Thanks, I was already looking into this package, too. I will try and report results. I was wondering how to control within this library or using some other models the country effect and product group effect. To clarify, there is also some products for which sales for all years since launch are available, from which country growth can be learned.

– aza07
Nov 25 '18 at 19:46





Thanks, I was already looking into this package, too. I will try and report results. I was wondering how to control within this library or using some other models the country effect and product group effect. To clarify, there is also some products for which sales for all years since launch are available, from which country growth can be learned.

– aza07
Nov 25 '18 at 19:46













I see, so there might be some inter-variable correlations you also can employ. You could try the package AMELIAII then. Chapter 4.6 / p.20 in the manual gives some hints on how to also consider the time aspects: cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Amelia/vignettes/amelia.pdf . It's only setting some parameters. I still would compare against results form e.g. imputeTS - often when the time correlations are way stronger than your inter-variable correlations you fare better with a sole time series imputation method.

– stats0007
Nov 26 '18 at 15:23





I see, so there might be some inter-variable correlations you also can employ. You could try the package AMELIAII then. Chapter 4.6 / p.20 in the manual gives some hints on how to also consider the time aspects: cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Amelia/vignettes/amelia.pdf . It's only setting some parameters. I still would compare against results form e.g. imputeTS - often when the time correlations are way stronger than your inter-variable correlations you fare better with a sole time series imputation method.

– stats0007
Nov 26 '18 at 15:23




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53379636%2fimputation-model-for-time-series-missing-data-in-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

鏡平學校

ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?