The Hungry Mouse












75












$begingroup$


Sixteen piles of cheese are put on a 4x4 square. They're labeled from $1$ to $16$. The smallest pile is $1$ and the biggest one is $16$.



The Hungry Mouse is so hungry that it always goes straight to the biggest pile (i.e. $16$) and eats it right away.



After that, it goes to the biggest neighboring pile and quickly eats that one as well. (Yeah ... It's really hungry.) And so on until there's no neighboring pile anymore.



A pile may have up to 8 neighbors (horizontally, vertically and diagonally). There's no wrap-around.



Example



We start with the following piles of cheese:



$$begin{matrix}
3&7&10&5\
6&8&12&13\
15&9&11&4\
14&1&16&2
end{matrix}$$



The Hungry Mouse first eats $16$, and then its biggest neighbor pile, which is $11$.



$$begin{matrix}
3&7&10&5\
6&8&12&13\
15&9&🐭&4\
14&1&color{grey}uparrow&2
end{matrix}$$



Its next moves are $13$, $12$, $10$, $8$, $15$, $14$, $9$, $6$, $7$ and $3$ in this exact order.



$$begin{matrix}
🐭&color{grey}leftarrow&smallcolor{grey}swarrow&5\
smallcolor{grey}nearrow&smallcolor{grey}swarrow&color{grey}uparrow&color{grey}leftarrow\
color{grey}downarrow&smallcolor{grey}nwarrow&smallcolor{grey}nearrow&4\
smallcolor{grey}nearrow&1&color{grey}uparrow&2
end{matrix}$$



There's no cheese anymore around the Hungry Mouse, so it stops there.



The challenge



Given the initial cheese configuration, your code must print or return the sum of the remaining piles once the Hungry Mouse has stopped eating them.



For the above example, the expected answer is $12$.



Rules




  • Because the size of the input matrix is fixed, you may take it as either a 2D array or a one-dimensional array.

  • Each value from $1$ to $16$ is guaranteed to appear exactly once.

  • This is code-golf.


Test cases



[ [ 4,  3,  2,  1], [ 5,  6,  7,  8], [12, 11, 10,  9], [13, 14, 15, 16] ] --> 0
[ [ 8, 1, 9, 14], [11, 6, 5, 16], [13, 15, 2, 7], [10, 3, 12, 4] ] --> 0
[ [ 1, 2, 3, 4], [ 5, 6, 7, 8], [ 9, 10, 11, 12], [13, 14, 15, 16] ] --> 1
[ [10, 15, 14, 11], [ 9, 3, 1, 7], [13, 5, 12, 6], [ 2, 8, 4, 16] ] --> 3
[ [ 3, 7, 10, 5], [ 6, 8, 12, 13], [15, 9, 11, 4], [14, 1, 16, 2] ] --> 12
[ [ 8, 9, 3, 6], [13, 11, 7, 15], [12, 10, 16, 2], [ 4, 14, 1, 5] ] --> 34
[ [ 8, 11, 12, 9], [14, 5, 10, 16], [ 7, 3, 1, 6], [13, 4, 2, 15] ] --> 51
[ [13, 14, 1, 2], [16, 15, 3, 4], [ 5, 6, 7, 8], [ 9, 10, 11, 12] ] --> 78
[ [ 9, 10, 11, 12], [ 1, 2, 4, 13], [ 7, 8, 5, 14], [ 3, 16, 6, 15] ] --> 102
[ [ 9, 10, 11, 12], [ 1, 2, 7, 13], [ 6, 16, 4, 14], [ 3, 8, 5, 15] ] --> 103









share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 28




    $begingroup$
    +1 for that mouse character
    $endgroup$
    – Luis Mendo
    Nov 19 '18 at 21:59








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    ...make that 103: [[9, 10, 11, 12], [1, 2, 7, 13], [6, 16, 4, 14], [3, 8, 5, 15]]
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Nov 19 '18 at 23:32








  • 8




    $begingroup$
    What a nicely written challenge! I'll keep it in mind for the best-of nominations.
    $endgroup$
    – xnor
    Nov 20 '18 at 2:22






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    After misreading I was a little sad that this was not a hungry moose.
    $endgroup$
    – akozi
    Nov 20 '18 at 13:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This challenge reminds me of the mouse in the maze program for the txo computer. This game was written way back in the 1950s, and the txo was the first transistorized computer in the world, according to legend. Yes, believe it or not, somebody was writing video games in your grandfather's day.
    $endgroup$
    – Walter Mitty
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:05
















75












$begingroup$


Sixteen piles of cheese are put on a 4x4 square. They're labeled from $1$ to $16$. The smallest pile is $1$ and the biggest one is $16$.



The Hungry Mouse is so hungry that it always goes straight to the biggest pile (i.e. $16$) and eats it right away.



After that, it goes to the biggest neighboring pile and quickly eats that one as well. (Yeah ... It's really hungry.) And so on until there's no neighboring pile anymore.



A pile may have up to 8 neighbors (horizontally, vertically and diagonally). There's no wrap-around.



Example



We start with the following piles of cheese:



$$begin{matrix}
3&7&10&5\
6&8&12&13\
15&9&11&4\
14&1&16&2
end{matrix}$$



The Hungry Mouse first eats $16$, and then its biggest neighbor pile, which is $11$.



$$begin{matrix}
3&7&10&5\
6&8&12&13\
15&9&🐭&4\
14&1&color{grey}uparrow&2
end{matrix}$$



Its next moves are $13$, $12$, $10$, $8$, $15$, $14$, $9$, $6$, $7$ and $3$ in this exact order.



$$begin{matrix}
🐭&color{grey}leftarrow&smallcolor{grey}swarrow&5\
smallcolor{grey}nearrow&smallcolor{grey}swarrow&color{grey}uparrow&color{grey}leftarrow\
color{grey}downarrow&smallcolor{grey}nwarrow&smallcolor{grey}nearrow&4\
smallcolor{grey}nearrow&1&color{grey}uparrow&2
end{matrix}$$



There's no cheese anymore around the Hungry Mouse, so it stops there.



The challenge



Given the initial cheese configuration, your code must print or return the sum of the remaining piles once the Hungry Mouse has stopped eating them.



For the above example, the expected answer is $12$.



Rules




  • Because the size of the input matrix is fixed, you may take it as either a 2D array or a one-dimensional array.

  • Each value from $1$ to $16$ is guaranteed to appear exactly once.

  • This is code-golf.


Test cases



[ [ 4,  3,  2,  1], [ 5,  6,  7,  8], [12, 11, 10,  9], [13, 14, 15, 16] ] --> 0
[ [ 8, 1, 9, 14], [11, 6, 5, 16], [13, 15, 2, 7], [10, 3, 12, 4] ] --> 0
[ [ 1, 2, 3, 4], [ 5, 6, 7, 8], [ 9, 10, 11, 12], [13, 14, 15, 16] ] --> 1
[ [10, 15, 14, 11], [ 9, 3, 1, 7], [13, 5, 12, 6], [ 2, 8, 4, 16] ] --> 3
[ [ 3, 7, 10, 5], [ 6, 8, 12, 13], [15, 9, 11, 4], [14, 1, 16, 2] ] --> 12
[ [ 8, 9, 3, 6], [13, 11, 7, 15], [12, 10, 16, 2], [ 4, 14, 1, 5] ] --> 34
[ [ 8, 11, 12, 9], [14, 5, 10, 16], [ 7, 3, 1, 6], [13, 4, 2, 15] ] --> 51
[ [13, 14, 1, 2], [16, 15, 3, 4], [ 5, 6, 7, 8], [ 9, 10, 11, 12] ] --> 78
[ [ 9, 10, 11, 12], [ 1, 2, 4, 13], [ 7, 8, 5, 14], [ 3, 16, 6, 15] ] --> 102
[ [ 9, 10, 11, 12], [ 1, 2, 7, 13], [ 6, 16, 4, 14], [ 3, 8, 5, 15] ] --> 103









share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 28




    $begingroup$
    +1 for that mouse character
    $endgroup$
    – Luis Mendo
    Nov 19 '18 at 21:59








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    ...make that 103: [[9, 10, 11, 12], [1, 2, 7, 13], [6, 16, 4, 14], [3, 8, 5, 15]]
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Nov 19 '18 at 23:32








  • 8




    $begingroup$
    What a nicely written challenge! I'll keep it in mind for the best-of nominations.
    $endgroup$
    – xnor
    Nov 20 '18 at 2:22






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    After misreading I was a little sad that this was not a hungry moose.
    $endgroup$
    – akozi
    Nov 20 '18 at 13:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This challenge reminds me of the mouse in the maze program for the txo computer. This game was written way back in the 1950s, and the txo was the first transistorized computer in the world, according to legend. Yes, believe it or not, somebody was writing video games in your grandfather's day.
    $endgroup$
    – Walter Mitty
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:05














75












75








75


10



$begingroup$


Sixteen piles of cheese are put on a 4x4 square. They're labeled from $1$ to $16$. The smallest pile is $1$ and the biggest one is $16$.



The Hungry Mouse is so hungry that it always goes straight to the biggest pile (i.e. $16$) and eats it right away.



After that, it goes to the biggest neighboring pile and quickly eats that one as well. (Yeah ... It's really hungry.) And so on until there's no neighboring pile anymore.



A pile may have up to 8 neighbors (horizontally, vertically and diagonally). There's no wrap-around.



Example



We start with the following piles of cheese:



$$begin{matrix}
3&7&10&5\
6&8&12&13\
15&9&11&4\
14&1&16&2
end{matrix}$$



The Hungry Mouse first eats $16$, and then its biggest neighbor pile, which is $11$.



$$begin{matrix}
3&7&10&5\
6&8&12&13\
15&9&🐭&4\
14&1&color{grey}uparrow&2
end{matrix}$$



Its next moves are $13$, $12$, $10$, $8$, $15$, $14$, $9$, $6$, $7$ and $3$ in this exact order.



$$begin{matrix}
🐭&color{grey}leftarrow&smallcolor{grey}swarrow&5\
smallcolor{grey}nearrow&smallcolor{grey}swarrow&color{grey}uparrow&color{grey}leftarrow\
color{grey}downarrow&smallcolor{grey}nwarrow&smallcolor{grey}nearrow&4\
smallcolor{grey}nearrow&1&color{grey}uparrow&2
end{matrix}$$



There's no cheese anymore around the Hungry Mouse, so it stops there.



The challenge



Given the initial cheese configuration, your code must print or return the sum of the remaining piles once the Hungry Mouse has stopped eating them.



For the above example, the expected answer is $12$.



Rules




  • Because the size of the input matrix is fixed, you may take it as either a 2D array or a one-dimensional array.

  • Each value from $1$ to $16$ is guaranteed to appear exactly once.

  • This is code-golf.


Test cases



[ [ 4,  3,  2,  1], [ 5,  6,  7,  8], [12, 11, 10,  9], [13, 14, 15, 16] ] --> 0
[ [ 8, 1, 9, 14], [11, 6, 5, 16], [13, 15, 2, 7], [10, 3, 12, 4] ] --> 0
[ [ 1, 2, 3, 4], [ 5, 6, 7, 8], [ 9, 10, 11, 12], [13, 14, 15, 16] ] --> 1
[ [10, 15, 14, 11], [ 9, 3, 1, 7], [13, 5, 12, 6], [ 2, 8, 4, 16] ] --> 3
[ [ 3, 7, 10, 5], [ 6, 8, 12, 13], [15, 9, 11, 4], [14, 1, 16, 2] ] --> 12
[ [ 8, 9, 3, 6], [13, 11, 7, 15], [12, 10, 16, 2], [ 4, 14, 1, 5] ] --> 34
[ [ 8, 11, 12, 9], [14, 5, 10, 16], [ 7, 3, 1, 6], [13, 4, 2, 15] ] --> 51
[ [13, 14, 1, 2], [16, 15, 3, 4], [ 5, 6, 7, 8], [ 9, 10, 11, 12] ] --> 78
[ [ 9, 10, 11, 12], [ 1, 2, 4, 13], [ 7, 8, 5, 14], [ 3, 16, 6, 15] ] --> 102
[ [ 9, 10, 11, 12], [ 1, 2, 7, 13], [ 6, 16, 4, 14], [ 3, 8, 5, 15] ] --> 103









share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Sixteen piles of cheese are put on a 4x4 square. They're labeled from $1$ to $16$. The smallest pile is $1$ and the biggest one is $16$.



The Hungry Mouse is so hungry that it always goes straight to the biggest pile (i.e. $16$) and eats it right away.



After that, it goes to the biggest neighboring pile and quickly eats that one as well. (Yeah ... It's really hungry.) And so on until there's no neighboring pile anymore.



A pile may have up to 8 neighbors (horizontally, vertically and diagonally). There's no wrap-around.



Example



We start with the following piles of cheese:



$$begin{matrix}
3&7&10&5\
6&8&12&13\
15&9&11&4\
14&1&16&2
end{matrix}$$



The Hungry Mouse first eats $16$, and then its biggest neighbor pile, which is $11$.



$$begin{matrix}
3&7&10&5\
6&8&12&13\
15&9&🐭&4\
14&1&color{grey}uparrow&2
end{matrix}$$



Its next moves are $13$, $12$, $10$, $8$, $15$, $14$, $9$, $6$, $7$ and $3$ in this exact order.



$$begin{matrix}
🐭&color{grey}leftarrow&smallcolor{grey}swarrow&5\
smallcolor{grey}nearrow&smallcolor{grey}swarrow&color{grey}uparrow&color{grey}leftarrow\
color{grey}downarrow&smallcolor{grey}nwarrow&smallcolor{grey}nearrow&4\
smallcolor{grey}nearrow&1&color{grey}uparrow&2
end{matrix}$$



There's no cheese anymore around the Hungry Mouse, so it stops there.



The challenge



Given the initial cheese configuration, your code must print or return the sum of the remaining piles once the Hungry Mouse has stopped eating them.



For the above example, the expected answer is $12$.



Rules




  • Because the size of the input matrix is fixed, you may take it as either a 2D array or a one-dimensional array.

  • Each value from $1$ to $16$ is guaranteed to appear exactly once.

  • This is code-golf.


Test cases



[ [ 4,  3,  2,  1], [ 5,  6,  7,  8], [12, 11, 10,  9], [13, 14, 15, 16] ] --> 0
[ [ 8, 1, 9, 14], [11, 6, 5, 16], [13, 15, 2, 7], [10, 3, 12, 4] ] --> 0
[ [ 1, 2, 3, 4], [ 5, 6, 7, 8], [ 9, 10, 11, 12], [13, 14, 15, 16] ] --> 1
[ [10, 15, 14, 11], [ 9, 3, 1, 7], [13, 5, 12, 6], [ 2, 8, 4, 16] ] --> 3
[ [ 3, 7, 10, 5], [ 6, 8, 12, 13], [15, 9, 11, 4], [14, 1, 16, 2] ] --> 12
[ [ 8, 9, 3, 6], [13, 11, 7, 15], [12, 10, 16, 2], [ 4, 14, 1, 5] ] --> 34
[ [ 8, 11, 12, 9], [14, 5, 10, 16], [ 7, 3, 1, 6], [13, 4, 2, 15] ] --> 51
[ [13, 14, 1, 2], [16, 15, 3, 4], [ 5, 6, 7, 8], [ 9, 10, 11, 12] ] --> 78
[ [ 9, 10, 11, 12], [ 1, 2, 4, 13], [ 7, 8, 5, 14], [ 3, 16, 6, 15] ] --> 102
[ [ 9, 10, 11, 12], [ 1, 2, 7, 13], [ 6, 16, 4, 14], [ 3, 8, 5, 15] ] --> 103






code-golf matrix






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 20 '18 at 12:11







Arnauld

















asked Nov 19 '18 at 21:35









ArnauldArnauld

76.1k693320




76.1k693320








  • 28




    $begingroup$
    +1 for that mouse character
    $endgroup$
    – Luis Mendo
    Nov 19 '18 at 21:59








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    ...make that 103: [[9, 10, 11, 12], [1, 2, 7, 13], [6, 16, 4, 14], [3, 8, 5, 15]]
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Nov 19 '18 at 23:32








  • 8




    $begingroup$
    What a nicely written challenge! I'll keep it in mind for the best-of nominations.
    $endgroup$
    – xnor
    Nov 20 '18 at 2:22






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    After misreading I was a little sad that this was not a hungry moose.
    $endgroup$
    – akozi
    Nov 20 '18 at 13:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This challenge reminds me of the mouse in the maze program for the txo computer. This game was written way back in the 1950s, and the txo was the first transistorized computer in the world, according to legend. Yes, believe it or not, somebody was writing video games in your grandfather's day.
    $endgroup$
    – Walter Mitty
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:05














  • 28




    $begingroup$
    +1 for that mouse character
    $endgroup$
    – Luis Mendo
    Nov 19 '18 at 21:59








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    ...make that 103: [[9, 10, 11, 12], [1, 2, 7, 13], [6, 16, 4, 14], [3, 8, 5, 15]]
    $endgroup$
    – Jonathan Allan
    Nov 19 '18 at 23:32








  • 8




    $begingroup$
    What a nicely written challenge! I'll keep it in mind for the best-of nominations.
    $endgroup$
    – xnor
    Nov 20 '18 at 2:22






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    After misreading I was a little sad that this was not a hungry moose.
    $endgroup$
    – akozi
    Nov 20 '18 at 13:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This challenge reminds me of the mouse in the maze program for the txo computer. This game was written way back in the 1950s, and the txo was the first transistorized computer in the world, according to legend. Yes, believe it or not, somebody was writing video games in your grandfather's day.
    $endgroup$
    – Walter Mitty
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:05








28




28




$begingroup$
+1 for that mouse character
$endgroup$
– Luis Mendo
Nov 19 '18 at 21:59






$begingroup$
+1 for that mouse character
$endgroup$
– Luis Mendo
Nov 19 '18 at 21:59






2




2




$begingroup$
...make that 103: [[9, 10, 11, 12], [1, 2, 7, 13], [6, 16, 4, 14], [3, 8, 5, 15]]
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Nov 19 '18 at 23:32






$begingroup$
...make that 103: [[9, 10, 11, 12], [1, 2, 7, 13], [6, 16, 4, 14], [3, 8, 5, 15]]
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Nov 19 '18 at 23:32






8




8




$begingroup$
What a nicely written challenge! I'll keep it in mind for the best-of nominations.
$endgroup$
– xnor
Nov 20 '18 at 2:22




$begingroup$
What a nicely written challenge! I'll keep it in mind for the best-of nominations.
$endgroup$
– xnor
Nov 20 '18 at 2:22




7




7




$begingroup$
After misreading I was a little sad that this was not a hungry moose.
$endgroup$
– akozi
Nov 20 '18 at 13:17




$begingroup$
After misreading I was a little sad that this was not a hungry moose.
$endgroup$
– akozi
Nov 20 '18 at 13:17




1




1




$begingroup$
This challenge reminds me of the mouse in the maze program for the txo computer. This game was written way back in the 1950s, and the txo was the first transistorized computer in the world, according to legend. Yes, believe it or not, somebody was writing video games in your grandfather's day.
$endgroup$
– Walter Mitty
Nov 20 '18 at 19:05




$begingroup$
This challenge reminds me of the mouse in the maze program for the txo computer. This game was written way back in the 1950s, and the txo was the first transistorized computer in the world, according to legend. Yes, believe it or not, somebody was writing video games in your grandfather's day.
$endgroup$
– Walter Mitty
Nov 20 '18 at 19:05










20 Answers
20






active

oldest

votes


















11












$begingroup$


Python 2, 133 130 bytes





a=input();m=16
for i in range(m):a[i*5:i*5]=0,
while m:i=a.index(m);a[i]=0;m=max(a[i+x]for x in[-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6])
print sum(a)


Try it online!



Takes a flattened list of 16 elements.



How it works



a=input();m=16

# Add zero padding on each row, and enough zeroes at the end to avoid index error
for i in range(m):a[i*5:i*5]=0,

# m == maximum element found in last iteration
# i == index of last eaten element
# eaten elements of `a` are reset to 0
while m:i=a.index(m);a[i]=0;m=max(a[i+x]for x in[-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6])
print sum(a)





share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The adjacent-cell expression a[i+x]for x in[-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6] can be shortened to a[i+j+j/3*2-6]for j in range(9) (the zero entry is harmless). Python 3 can surely do shorter by hardcoding a length-8 bytestring, but Python 2 might still be better overall.
    $endgroup$
    – xnor
    Nov 20 '18 at 3:02






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Though your zero padding loop is clever, it looks like it's shorter to take a 2D list: a=[0]*5 for r in input():a=r+[0]+a. Perhaps there's a yet shorter string slicing solution that doesn't require iterating.
    $endgroup$
    – xnor
    Nov 20 '18 at 3:33



















8












$begingroup$


Python 2, 111 bytes





i=x=a=input()
while x:x,i=max((y,j)for j,y in enumerate(a)if i>or 2>i/4-j/4>-2<i%4-j%4<2);a[i]=0
print sum(a)


Try it online!



Method and test cases adapted from Bubbler. Takes a flat list on STDIN.



The code checks whether two flat indices i and j represent touching cells by checking that both row different i/4-j/4 and column difference i%4-j%4 are strictly between -2 and 2. The first pass instead has this check automatically succeed so that the largest entry is found disregarding adjacency.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    8












    $begingroup$


    MATL, 50 49 47 bytes



    16:HZ^!"2G@m1ZIm~]v16eXK68E16b"Ky0)Y)fyX-X>h]s-


    Input is a matrix, using ; as row separator.



    Try it online! Or verify all test cases.



    Explanation



    16:HZ^!  % Cartesian power of [1 2 ... 16] with exponent 2, transpose. Gives a 
    % 2-row matrix with 1st column [1; 1], 2nd [1; 2], ..., last [16; 16]
    " % For each column, say [k; j]
    2 % Push 2
    G@m % Push input matrix, then current column [k; j], then check membership.
    % This gives a 4×4 matrix that contains 1 for entries of the input that
    % contain k or j
    1ZI % Connected components (based on 8-neighbourhood) of nonzero entries.
    % This gives a 4×4 matrix with each connected component labeled with
    % values 1, 2, ... respectively
    m~ % True if 2 is not present in this matrix. That means there is only
    % one connected component; that is, k and j are neighbours in the
    % input matrix, or k=j
    ] % End
    v16e % The stack now has 256 values. Concatenate them into a vector and
    % reshape as a 16×16 matrix. This matrix describes neighbourhood: entry
    % (k,j) is 1 if values k and j are neighbours in the input or if k=j
    XK % Copy into clipboard K
    68E % Push 68 times 2, that is, 136, which is 1+2+...+16
    16 % Push 16. This is the initial value eaten by the mouse. New values will
    % be appended to create a vector of eaten values
    b % Bubble up the 16×16 matrix to the top of the stack
    " % For each column. This just executes the loop 16 times
    K % Push neighbourhood matrix from clipboard K
    y % Copy from below: pushes a copy of the vector of eaten values
    0) % Get last value. This is the most recent eaten value
    Y) % Get that row of the neighbourhood matrix
    f % Indices of nonzeros. This gives a vector of neighbours of the last
    % eaten value
    y % Copy from below: pushes a copy of the vector of eaten values
    X- % Set difference (may give an empty result)
    X> % Maximum value. This is the new eaten value (maximum neighbour not
    % already eaten). May be empty, if all neighbours are already eaten
    h % Concatenate to vector of eaten values
    ] % End
    s % Sum of vector of all eaten values
    - % Subtract from 136. Implicitly display





    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Idk MatLab, but can you save a little if you push -136 instead of +136?
      $endgroup$
      – Titus
      Nov 21 '18 at 1:31










    • $begingroup$
      @Titus Hm I don't see how
      $endgroup$
      – Luis Mendo
      Nov 21 '18 at 9:20










    • $begingroup$
      or the other way round: I thought instead of 1) push 136 2) push each eaten value 3) sum up eaten values 4) subtract from 136 -> 1) push 136 2) push negative of eaten value 3) sum up stack. But as it obviously is only one byte each; it´s probably no gain.
      $endgroup$
      – Titus
      Nov 21 '18 at 13:33










    • $begingroup$
      @Titus Ah, yes, I think that uses the same number of bytes. Also, I need each eaten value (not its negative) for the set difference; negating would have to be done at the end
      $endgroup$
      – Luis Mendo
      Nov 21 '18 at 13:37





















    6












    $begingroup$

    PHP, 177 174 171 bytes



    for($v=16;$v;$u+=$v=max($p%4-1?max($a[$p-5],$a[$p-1],$a[$p+3]):0,$a[$p-4],$a[$p+4],$p%4?max($a[$p-3],$a[$p+1],$a[$p+5]):0))$a[$p=array_search($v,$a=&$argv)]=0;echo 120-$u;


    Run with -nr, provide matrix elements as arguments or try it online.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$





















      5












      $begingroup$


      R, 128 124 123 bytes





      r=rbind(0,cbind(0,matrix(scan(),4,4),0),0)
      m=which(r>15)
      while(r[m]){r[m]=0
      m=which(r==max(r[m+c(-7:-5,-1,1,5:7)]))}
      sum(r)


      Try it online!



      TIO link is slightly different, I am still trying to figure out how to make it work.



      I do feel like I can golf a lot more out of this. But this works for now.



      It creates a 4x4 matrix (which helped me to visualize things), pads it with 0's, then begins from 16 and searches it's surrounding "piles" for the next largest, and so forth.



      Upon conclusion, it does output a warning, but it is of no consequence and does not change the result.



      EDIT: -4 bytes by compressing the initialization of the matrix into 1 line.



      EDIT: -1 thanks to Robert Hacken






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        You can save one byte changing r==16 for r>15.
        $endgroup$
        – Robert Hacken
        Nov 24 '18 at 23:41










      • $begingroup$
        117 bytes -- change it to a function taking a matrix and do some aliasing with the which.
        $endgroup$
        – Giuseppe
        Nov 27 '18 at 15:32



















      4












      $begingroup$


      Charcoal, 47 bytes



      EA⭆ι§αλ≔QθW›θA«≔⌕KAθθJ﹪θ⁴÷θ⁴≔⌈KMθA»≔ΣEKA⌕αιθ⎚Iθ


      Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



      EA⭆ι§αλ


      Convert the input numbers into alphabetic characters (A=0 .. Q=16) and print them as a 4x4 grid.



      ≔Qθ


      Start by eating the Q, i.e. 16.



      W›θA«


      Repeat while there is something to eat.



      ≔⌕KAθθ


      Find where the pile is. This is a linear view in row-major order.



      J﹪θ⁴÷θ⁴


      Convert to co-ordinates and jump to that location.



      ≔⌈KMθ


      Find the largest adjacent pile.






      Eat the current pile.



      ≔ΣEKA⌕αιθ


      Convert the piles back to integers and take the sum.



      ⎚Iθ


      Clear the canvas and output the result.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$





















        4












        $begingroup$

        JavaScript, 122 bytes



        I took more than a couple of wrong turns on this one and now I've run out of time for further golfing but at least it's working. Will revisit tomorrow (or, knowing me, on the train home this evening!), if I can find a minute.



        a=>(g=n=>n?g([-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6].map(x=>n=a[x+=i]>n?a[x]:n,a[i=a.indexOf(n)]=n=0)|n)-n:120)(16,a=a.flatMap(x=>[...x,0]))


        Try it online






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$









        • 3




          $begingroup$
          +1 for flatMap() :p
          $endgroup$
          – Arnauld
          Nov 20 '18 at 17:29










        • $begingroup$
          :D I think this is the first time I've used it for golf! Out of interest (and to give me a target when I come back to this), what was your score when you tried it?
          $endgroup$
          – Shaggy
          Nov 20 '18 at 17:46










        • $begingroup$
          Didn't get a minute to come back to this today. Hopefully that means I'll be able to start over with completely fresh eyes tomorrow.
          $endgroup$
          – Shaggy
          Nov 21 '18 at 17:14










        • $begingroup$
          I've posted my solution.
          $endgroup$
          – Arnauld
          Dec 13 '18 at 15:13



















        3












        $begingroup$

        SAS, 236 219 bytes



        Input on punch cards, one line per grid (space-separated), output printed to the log.



        This challenge is slightly complicated by some limitations of arrays in SAS:




        • There is no way to return the row and column indexes of a matching element from multidimensional data-step array - you have to treat the array as 1-d and then work them out for yourself.

        • If you go out of bounds, SAS throws an error and halts processing rather than returning null / zero.


        Updates:




        • Removed infile cards; statement (-13)

        • Used wildcard a: for array definition rather than a1-a16 (-4)


        Golfed:



        data;input a1-a16;array a[4,4]a:;p=16;t=136;do while(p);m=whichn(p,of a:);t=t-p;j=mod(m-1,4)+1;i=ceil(m/4);a[i,j]=0;p=0;do k=max(1,i-1)to min(i+1,4);do l=max(1,j-1)to min(j+1,4);p=max(p,a[k,l]);end;end;end;put t;cards;
        <insert punch cards here>
        ;


        Ungolfed:



        data;                /*Produce a dataset using automatic naming*/
        input a1-a16; /*Read 16 variables*/
        array a[4,4] a:; /*Assign to a 4x4 array*/
        p=16; /*Initial pile to look for*/
        t=136; /*Total cheese to decrement*/
        do while(p); /*Stop if there are no piles available with size > 0*/
        m=whichn(p,of a:); /*Find array element containing current pile size*/
        t=t-p; /*Decrement total cheese*/
        j=mod(m-1,4)+1; /*Get column number*/
        i=ceil(m/4); /*Get row number*/
        a[i,j]=0; /*Eat the current pile*/
        /*Find the size of the largest adjacent pile*/
        p=0;
        do k=max(1,i-1)to min(i+1,4);
        do l=max(1,j-1)to min(j+1,4);
        p=max(p,a[k,l]);
        end;
        end;
        end;
        put t; /*Print total remaining cheese to log*/
        /*Start of punch card input*/
        cards;
        4 3 2 1 5 6 7 8 12 11 10 9 13 14 15 16
        8 1 9 14 11 6 5 16 13 15 2 7 10 3 12 4
        1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
        10 15 14 11 9 3 1 7 13 5 12 6 2 8 4 16
        3 7 10 5 6 8 12 13 15 9 11 4 14 1 16 2
        8 9 3 6 13 11 7 15 12 10 16 2 4 14 1 5
        8 11 12 9 14 5 10 16 7 3 1 6 13 4 2 15
        13 14 1 2 16 15 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
        9 10 11 12 1 2 4 13 7 8 5 14 3 16 6 15
        9 10 11 12 1 2 7 13 6 16 4 14 3 8 5 15
        ; /*End of punch card input*/
        /*Implicit run;*/





        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$









        • 1




          $begingroup$
          +1 for use of punch cards in PPCG :)
          $endgroup$
          – GNiklasch
          Nov 20 '18 at 18:25



















        3












        $begingroup$


        Haskell, 163 bytes





        o f=foldl1 f.concat
        r=[0..3]
        q n=take(min(n+2)3).drop(n-1)
        0#m=m
        v#m=[o max$q y$q x<$>n|y<-r,x<-r,m!!y!!x==v]!!0#n where n=map(z<$>)m;z w|w==v=0|0<1=w
        f=o(+).(16#)


        Try it online!



        The f function takes the input as a list of 4 lists of 4 integers.



        Slightly ungolfed



        -- helper to fold over the matrix
        o f = foldl1 f . concat

        -- range of indices
        r = [0 .. 3]

        -- slice a list (take the neighborhood of a given coordinate)
        -- first we drop everything before the neighborhood and then take the neighborhood itself
        q n = take (min (n + 2) 3) . drop (n - 1)

        -- a step function
        0 # m = m -- if the max value of the previous step is zero, return the map
        v # m =
        -- abuse list comprehension to find the current value in the map
        -- convert the found value to its neighborhood,
        -- then calculate the max cell value in it
        -- and finally take the head of the resulting list
        [ o max (q y (q x<$>n)) | y <- r, x <- r, m!!y!!x == v] !! 0
        # n -- recurse with our new current value and new map
        where
        -- a new map with the zero put in place of the value the mouse currently sits on
        n = map (zero <$>) m
        -- this function returns zero if its argument is equal to v
        -- and original argument value otherwise
        zero w
        | w == v = 0
        | otherwise = w

        -- THE function. first apply the step function to incoming map,
        -- then compute sum of its cells
        f = o (+) . (16 #)





        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$





















          3












          $begingroup$

          Java 10, 272 bytes





          m->{int r=0,c=0,R=4,C,M=1,x,y,X=0,Y=0;for(;R-->0;)for(C=4;C-->0;)if(m[R][C]>15)m[r=R][c=C]=0;for(;M!=0;m[r=X][c=Y]=0)for(M=-1,C=9;C-->0;)try{if((R=m[x=C<3?r-1:C>5?r+1:r][y=C%3<1?c-1:C%3>1?c+1:c])>M){M=R;X=x;Y=y;}}catch(Exception e){}for(var Z:m)for(int z:Z)M+=z;return M;}


          The cells are checked the same as in my answer for the All the single eights challenge.



          Try it online.



          Explanation:



          m->{                       // Method with integer-matrix parameter and integer return-type
          int r=0, // Row-coordinate for the largest number, starting at 0
          c=0, // Column-coordinate for the largest number, starting at 0
          R=4,C, // Row and column indices (later reused as temp integers)
          M=1, // Largest number the mouse just ate, starting at 1
          x,y,X=0,Y=0; // Temp integers
          for(;R-->0;) // Loop `R` in the range (4, 0]:
          for(C=4;C-->0;) // Inner loop `C` in the range (4, 0]:
          if(m[R][C]>15) // If the current cell is 16:
          m[r=R][c=C] // Set `r,c` to this coordinate
          =0; // And empty this cell
          for(;M!=0; // Loop as long as the largest number isn't 0:
          ; // After every iteration:
          m[r=X][c=Y] // Change the `r,c` coordinates,
          =0) // And empty this cell
          for(M=-1, // Reset `M` to -1
          C=9;C-->0;) // Inner loop `C` in the range (9, 0]:
          try{if((R= // Set `R` to:
          m[x=C<3? // If `C` is 0, 1, or 2:
          r-1 // Look at the previous row
          :C>5? // Else-if `C` is 6, 7, or 8:
          r+1 // Look at the next row
          : // Else (`C` is 3, 4, or 5):
          r] // Look at the current row
          [y=C%3<1? // If `C` is 0, 3, or 6:
          c-1 // Look at the previous column
          :C%3>1? // Else-if `C` is 2, 5, or 8:
          c+1 // Look at the next column
          : // Else (`C` is 1, 4, or 7):
          c]) // Look at the current column
          >M){ // And if the number in this cell is larger than `M`
          M=R; // Change `M` to this number
          X=x;Y=y;} // And change the `X,Y` coordinate to this cell
          }catch(Exception e){}
          // Catch and ignore ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExceptions
          // (try-catch saves bytes in comparison to if-checks)
          for(var Z:m) // Then loop over all rows of the matrix:
          for(int z:Z) // Inner loop over all columns of the matrix:
          M+=z; // And sum them all together in `M` (which was 0)
          return M;} // Then return this sum as result





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            could you not to int r=c=X=Y=0,R=4,M=1,x,y; ?
            $endgroup$
            – Serverfrog
            Nov 22 '18 at 12:53










          • $begingroup$
            @Serverfrog I'm afraid that's not possible when declaring the variables in Java. Your suggestion did give me an idea to save a byte though, by using int r,c,R=4,M=1,x,y,X,Y;for(r=c=X=Y=0;, so thanks. :)
            $endgroup$
            – Kevin Cruijssen
            Nov 22 '18 at 15:48





















          2












          $begingroup$


          Jelly,  31 30  29 bytes



          ³œiⱮZIỊȦ
          ⁴ṖŒPŒ!€Ẏ⁴;ⱮṢÇƇṪ
          FḟÇS


          Since the method is far too slow to run within 60s with the mouse starting on 16 this starts her off at 9 and limits her ability such that she is only able to eat 9s or less Try it online! (thus here she eats 9, 2, 7, 4, 8, 6, 3 leaving 97).



          How?



          ³œiⱮZIỊȦ - Link 1, isSatisfactory?: list of integers, possiblePileChoice
          ³ - (using a left argument of) program's 3rd command line argument (M)
          Ɱ - map across (possiblePileChoice) with:
          œi - first multi-dimensional index of (the item) in (M)
          Z - transpose the resulting list of [row, column] values
          I - get the incremental differences
          Ị - insignificant? (vectorises an abs(v) <= 1 test)
          Ȧ - any and all? (0 if any 0s are present in the flattened result [or if it's empty])

          ⁴ṖŒPŒ!€Ẏ⁴;ⱮṢÇƇṪ - Link 2, getChosenPileList: list of lists of integers, M
          ⁴ - literal 16
          Ṗ - pop -> [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]
          ŒP - power-set -> [,[1],[2],...,[1,2],[1,3],...,[2,3,7],...,[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]]
          € - for each:
          Œ! - all permutations
          Ẏ - tighten (to a single list of all these individual permutations)
          ⁴ - (using a left argument of) literal 16
          Ɱ - map across it with:
          ; - concatenate (put a 16 at the beginning of each one)
          Ṣ - sort the resulting list of lists
          Ƈ - filter keep those for which this is truthy:
          Ç - call last Link as a monad (i.e. isSatisfactory(possiblePileChoice)
          Ṫ - tail (get the right-most, i.e. the maximal satisfactory one)

          FḟÇS - Main Link: list of lists of integers, M
          F - flatten M
          Ç - call last Link (2) as a monad (i.e. get getChosenPileList(M))
          ḟ - filter discard (the resulting values) from (the flattened M)
          S - sum





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ah yeah, power-set is not enough!
            $endgroup$
            – Jonathan Allan
            Nov 20 '18 at 0:34






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @Arnauld - finally got a little time to golf :D This should work, but will be (way) too slow for running at TIO with the test case you used before.
            $endgroup$
            – Jonathan Allan
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:02



















          2












          $begingroup$

          Powershell, 143 141 136 130 122 121 bytes





          $a=,0*5+($args|%{$_+0})
          for($n=16;$i=$a.IndexOf($n)){$a[$i]=0
          $n=(-1,1+-6..-4+4..6|%{$a[$i+$_]}|sort)[-1]}$a|%{$s+=$_}
          $s


          Less golfed test script:



          $f = {

          $a=,0*5+($args|%{$_+0})
          for($n=16;$i=$a.IndexOf($n)){
          $a[$i]=0
          $n=(-1,1+-6..-4+4..6|%{$a[$i+$_]}|sort)[-1]
          }
          $a|%{$s+=$_}
          $s

          }

          @(
          ,( 0 , ( 4, 3, 2, 1), ( 5, 6, 7, 8), (12, 11, 10, 9), (13, 14, 15, 16) )
          ,( 0 , ( 8, 1, 9, 14), (11, 6, 5, 16), (13, 15, 2, 7), (10, 3, 12, 4) )
          ,( 1 , ( 1, 2, 3, 4), ( 5, 6, 7, 8), ( 9, 10, 11, 12), (13, 14, 15, 16) )
          ,( 3 , (10, 15, 14, 11), ( 9, 3, 1, 7), (13, 5, 12, 6), ( 2, 8, 4, 16) )
          ,( 12 , ( 3, 7, 10, 5), ( 6, 8, 12, 13), (15, 9, 11, 4), (14, 1, 16, 2) )
          ,( 34 , ( 8, 9, 3, 6), (13, 11, 7, 15), (12, 10, 16, 2), ( 4, 14, 1, 5) )
          ,( 51 , ( 8, 11, 12, 9), (14, 5, 10, 16), ( 7, 3, 1, 6), (13, 4, 2, 15) )
          ,( 78 , (13, 14, 1, 2), (16, 15, 3, 4), ( 5, 6, 7, 8), ( 9, 10, 11, 12) )
          ,( 102, ( 9, 10, 11, 12), ( 1, 2, 4, 13), ( 7, 8, 5, 14), ( 3, 16, 6, 15) )
          ,( 103, ( 9, 10, 11, 12), ( 1, 2, 7, 13), ( 6, 16, 4, 14), ( 3, 8, 5, 15) )
          ) | % {
          $expected, $a = $_
          $result = &$f @a
          "$($result-eq$expected): $result"
          }


          Output:



          True: 0
          True: 0
          True: 1
          True: 3
          True: 12
          True: 34
          True: 51
          True: 78
          True: 102
          True: 103


          Explanation:



          First, add top and bottom borders of 0 and make a single dimensional array:





          0 0 0 0 0
          # # # # 0
          # # # # 0
          # # # # 0
          # # # # 0



          0 0 0 0 0 # # # # 0 # # # # 0 # # # # 0 # # # # 0


          Powershell returns $null if you try to get the value behind the end of the array.



          Second, loop biggest neighbor pile started from 16 to non-zero-maximum. And nullify it (The Hungry Mouse eats it).





          for($n=16;$i=$a.IndexOf($n)){
          $a[$i]=0
          $n=(-1,1+-6..-4+4..6|%{$a[$i+$_]}|sort)[-1]
          }


          Third, sum of the remaining piles.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            2












            $begingroup$


            APL (Dyalog Unicode), 42 41 bytesSBCS





            16{×⍺:a∇⍨+/,m×⌈/⌈/⊢⌺3 3⊢a←⍵×~m←⍺=⍵⋄+/,⍵}⊢


            Try it online!






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$





















              1












              $begingroup$

              J, 82 bytes



              g=.](]*{:@[~:])]_1}~[:>./]{~((,-)1 5 6 7)+]i.{:
              [:+/[:(g^:_)16,~[:,0,~0,0,0,.~0,.]


              Try it online!



              I plan to golf this more tomorrow, and perhaps write a more J-ish solution similar to this one, but I figured I'd try the flattened approach since I hadn't done that before.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Do you really need the leftmost ] in g?
                $endgroup$
                – Galen Ivanov
                Nov 20 '18 at 7:45






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Thanks Galen, you're right. It's the least of the issues with this code :) I have a much better solution which I'll implement when I have time.
                $endgroup$
                – Jonah
                Nov 21 '18 at 1:26



















              1












              $begingroup$


              Red, 277 bytes



              func[a][k: 16 until[t:(index? find load form a k)- 1
              p: do rejoin[t / 4 + 1"x"t % 4 + 1]a/(p/1)/(p/2): 0
              m: 0 foreach d[-1 0x-1 1x-1 -1x0 1x0 -1x1 0x1 1][j: p + d
              if all[j/1 > 0 j/1 < 5 j/2 > 0 j/2 < 5 m < t: a/(j/1)/(j/2)][m: t]]0 = k: m]s: 0
              foreach n load form a[s: s + n]s]


              Try it online!



              It's really long solution and I'm not happy with it, but I spent so much time fixing it to work in TIO (apparently there are many differences between the Win and Linux stable versions of Red), so I post it anyway...



              More readable:



              f: func [ a ] [
              k: 16
              until [
              t: (index? find load form a n) - 1
              p: do rejoin [ t / 4 + 1 "x" t % 4 + 1 ]
              a/(p/1)/(p/2): 0
              m: 0
              foreach d [ -1 0x-1 1x-1 -1x0 1x0 -1x1 0x1 1 ] [
              j: p + d
              if all[ j/1 > 0
              j/1 < 5
              j/2 > 0
              j/2 < 5
              m < t: a/(j/1)/(j/2)
              ] [ m: t ]
              ]
              0 = k: m
              ]
              s: 0
              foreach n load form a [ s: s + n ]
              s
              ]





              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$





















                1












                $begingroup$

                Not my best work. There's some definite improvements to be done, some probably fundamental to the algorithm used -- I'm sure it can be improved by using only an int, but I couldn't figure out how to efficiently enumerate neighbors that way. I'd love to see a PowerShell solution that uses only a single dimensional array!




                PowerShell Core, 348 bytes





                Function F($o){$t=120;$a=@{-1=,0*4;4=,0*4};0..3|%{$a[$_]=[int](-join$o[(3+18*$_)..(3+18*$_+13)]-split',')+,0};$m=16;while($m-gt0){0..3|%{$i=$_;0..3|%{if($a[$i][$_]-eq$m){$r=$i;$c=$_}}};$m=($a[$r-1][$c-1],$a[$r-1][$c],$a[$r-1][$c+1],$a[$r][$c+1],$a[$r][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c],$a[$r+1][$c+1]|Measure -Max).Maximum;$t-=$m;$a[$r][$c]=0}$t}


                Try it online!





                More readable version:



                Function F($o){
                $t=120;
                $a=@{-1=,0*4;4=,0*4};
                0..3|%{$a[$_]=[int](-join$o[(3+18*$_)..(3+18*$_+13)]-split',')+,0};
                $m=16;
                while($m-gt0){
                0..3|%{$i=$_;0..3|%{if($a[$i][$_]-eq$m){$r=$i;$c=$_}}};
                $m=($a[$r-1][$c-1],$a[$r-1][$c],$a[$r-1][$c+1],$a[$r][$c+1],$a[$r][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c],$a[$r+1][$c+1]|Measure -Max).Maximum;
                $t-=$m;
                $a[$r][$c]=0
                }
                $t
                }





                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$









                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  334 bytes after simple restructuring
                  $endgroup$
                  – Veskah
                  Jan 17 at 22:41










                • $begingroup$
                  Oh yeah, weird thing I noticed is that trying to do the (array|sort)[-1] instead of Measure -max worked in PSv5 but was getting incorrect results in core. No idea why.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Veskah
                  Jan 17 at 22:44










                • $begingroup$
                  Yeah, that's weird. I tested it on (0..10|sort)[-1] but it returns 10 on PSv5 but 9 on PS Core. This is because it treats it in lexicographical order instead of numeric. Shame, that.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Jeff Freeman
                  Jan 17 at 23:04










                • $begingroup$
                  Classic Microsoft changing the important things.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Veskah
                  Jan 17 at 23:12










                • $begingroup$
                  I agree in this case. I'm not sure why PS Core Sort throws an array of int32 to an array of strings. But, this is straying into a rant, so I'll digress. Thanks for the restructure!
                  $endgroup$
                  – Jeff Freeman
                  Jan 18 at 14:57



















                1












                $begingroup$


                Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 149 bytes



                (g@p_:=#&@@Position[s,Max@p];m=g[s=#];While[Tr[b=s[[##]]&@@#&/@Select[#+m&/@Tuples[{-1,0,1},2],Max@#<5&&Min@#>0&]]>0,m=g@b;s[[##&@@m]]=0];Tr[Tr/@s])&


                Try it online!






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$





















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  JavaScript (ES7), 97 bytes



                  Takes input as a flattened array.





                  f=(a,s=p=136,m,d)=>a.map((v,n)=>v<m|(n%4-p%4)**2+(n-p)**2/9>d||(q=n,m=v))|m?f(a,s-m,a[p=q]=0,4):s


                  Try it online!



                  Commented



                  f = (                    // f= recursive function taking:
                  a, // - a = flattened input array
                  s = // - s = sum of cheese piles, initialized to 1 + 2 + .. + 16 = 136
                  p = 136, // - p = position of the mouse, initially outside the board
                  m, // - m = maximum pile, initially undefined
                  d // - d = distance threshold, initially undefined
                  ) => //
                  a.map((v, n) => // for each pile v at position n in a:
                  v < m | // unless this pile is not better than the current maximum
                  (n % 4 - p % 4) ** 2 // or (n % 4 - p % 4)²
                  + (n - p) ** 2 / 9 // + (n - p)² / 9
                  > d || // is greater than the distance threshold:
                  (q = n, m = v) // update m to v and q to n
                  ) // end of map()
                  | m ? // if we've found a new pile to eat:
                  f( // do a recursive call:
                  a, // pass a unchanged
                  s - m, // update s by subtracting the pile we've just eaten
                  a[p = q] = 0, // clear a[q], update p to q and set m = 0
                  4 // use d = 4 for all next iterations
                  ) // end of recursive call
                  : // else:
                  s // stop recursion and return s





                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$













                  • $begingroup$
                    Yep, I never would have got anywhere close to that!
                    $endgroup$
                    – Shaggy
                    Dec 13 '18 at 16:16



















                  1












                  $begingroup$


                  Add++, 281 bytes



                  D,f,@@,VBFB]G€=dbLRz€¦*bMd1_4/i1+$4%B]4 4b[$z€¦o
                  D,g,@@,c2112011022200200BD1€Ω_2$TAVb]8*z€kþbNG€lbM
                  D,k,@~,z€¦+d4€>¦+$d1€<¦+$@+!*
                  D,l,@@#,bUV1_$:G1_$:
                  D,h,@@,{l}A$bUV1_$:$VbU","jG$t0€obU0j","$t€iA$bUpVdbLRG€=€!z€¦*$b]4*$z€¦o
                  y:?
                  m:16
                  t:120
                  Wm,`x,$f>y>m,`m,$g>x>y,`y,$h>x>y,`t,-m
                  Ot


                  Try it online!



                  Oof, this is a complicated one.



                  Verify all test cases



                  How it works



                  For this explanation, we will use the input



                  $M = left[begin{matrix}
                  3 & 7 & 10 & 5 \
                  6 & 8 & 12 & 13 \
                  15 & 9 & 11 & 4 \
                  14 & 1 & 16 & 2 \
                  end{matrix}right]$



                  We start by defining a series of helper functions. We will use $x$ to represent an integer such that $1 le x le 16$, $M$ to, initially, represent the $4text{x}4$ input matrix. The functions are:




                  • $f(x, M)$: Given a value and a $4text{x}4$ matrix, return the co-ordinates of $x$ in $M$ e.g. if $x = 16$ and $M$ is above, $f(x, M) = (4, 3)$



                  • $g(M, y)$: Given a matrix and two co-ordinates, return the largest of the neighbours of the value at that point e.g. using $f(x, M)$ from above, $g(M, f(x, M)) = 11$



                    This implements the two helper functions:



                    $k(x)$ which removes any co-ordinates which would wrap around or be out of bounds



                    $l(M, y)$ which, given a matrix and co-ordinates, returns the value at those co-ordinates



                  • $h(y, M)$ which, given a matrix and co-ordinates, sets the value at those indexes to $0$



                  After these functions are defined, we come to the main body of the program. The first step is to assign the four variables, x, y, m and t. x is set to $0$ by default, y to the input, m to $16$ (the first value to search for) and t to $120 : (1 + 2 + cdots + 14 + 15)$.



                  Next, we enter a while loop, that loops while m does not equal $0$. The steps in the loop go something along the lines of



                  While m $neq 0$:




                  • Set x to $f(textbf{y}, textbf{m})$. For the first iteration, this sets x to the co-ordinates of $16$ is $M$ ($x := (4, 3)$ in our example)

                  • Set m to $g(textbf{x}, textbf{y})$. This yields the largest new neighbour to m, or $0$, if there are no new neighbours (which ends the while loop).

                  • Set y to $h(textbf{x}, textbf{y})$. This sets the previous value of m ($16$ in the first iteration) to $0$, in order for the previous step to work

                  • Set t to $textbf{t} - textbf{m}$, removing that value from the total value amount.


                  Finally, output t, i.e. the remaining, non collected values.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$





















                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    C (gcc), 250 bytes



                    x;y;i;b;R;C;
                    g(int a[4],int X,int Y){b=a[Y][X]=0;for(x=-1;x&lt2;++x)for(y=-1;y<2;++y)if(!(x+X&~3||y+Y&~3||a[y+Y][x+X]<b))b=a[C=Y+y][R=X+x];for(i=x=0;i<16;++i)x+=a[0][i];return b?g(a,R,C):x;}
                    s(int*a){for(i=0;i<16;++i)if(a[i]==16)return g(a,i%4,i/4);}


                    Try it online!



                    Note: This submission modifies the input array.



                    s() is the function to call with an argument of a mutable int[16] (which is the same in-memory as an int[4][4], which is what g() interprets it as).



                    s() finds the location of the 16 in the array, then passes this information to g, which is a recursive function that takes a location, sets the number at that location to 0, and then:




                    • If there is a positive number adjacent to it, recurse with the location of the largest adjacent number


                    • Else, return the sum of the numbers in the array.







                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      s(int*a){for(i=0;a[i]<16;++i);return g(a,i%4,i/4);}
                      $endgroup$
                      – RiaD
                      Nov 24 '18 at 14:37










                    • $begingroup$
                      if g returns sum of eaten you don't need to calculate sum in it. Just return 16*17/2-g() at the end of s
                      $endgroup$
                      – RiaD
                      Nov 24 '18 at 14:43










                    • $begingroup$
                      can you use bitwise or instead if logical or?
                      $endgroup$
                      – RiaD
                      Nov 24 '18 at 14:45










                    • $begingroup$
                      211 bytes
                      $endgroup$
                      – ceilingcat
                      Dec 31 '18 at 18:33











                    Your Answer





                    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
                    });
                    });
                    }, "mathjax-editing");

                    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
                    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
                    StackExchange.snippets.init();
                    });
                    });
                    }, "code-snippets");

                    StackExchange.ready(function() {
                    var channelOptions = {
                    tags: "".split(" "),
                    id: "200"
                    };
                    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                    createEditor();
                    });
                    }
                    else {
                    createEditor();
                    }
                    });

                    function createEditor() {
                    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                    heartbeatType: 'answer',
                    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                    convertImagesToLinks: false,
                    noModals: true,
                    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                    reputationToPostImages: null,
                    bindNavPrevention: true,
                    postfix: "",
                    imageUploader: {
                    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                    allowUrls: true
                    },
                    onDemand: true,
                    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                    });


                    }
                    });














                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f176251%2fthe-hungry-mouse%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown

























                    20 Answers
                    20






                    active

                    oldest

                    votes








                    20 Answers
                    20






                    active

                    oldest

                    votes









                    active

                    oldest

                    votes






                    active

                    oldest

                    votes









                    11












                    $begingroup$


                    Python 2, 133 130 bytes





                    a=input();m=16
                    for i in range(m):a[i*5:i*5]=0,
                    while m:i=a.index(m);a[i]=0;m=max(a[i+x]for x in[-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6])
                    print sum(a)


                    Try it online!



                    Takes a flattened list of 16 elements.



                    How it works



                    a=input();m=16

                    # Add zero padding on each row, and enough zeroes at the end to avoid index error
                    for i in range(m):a[i*5:i*5]=0,

                    # m == maximum element found in last iteration
                    # i == index of last eaten element
                    # eaten elements of `a` are reset to 0
                    while m:i=a.index(m);a[i]=0;m=max(a[i+x]for x in[-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6])
                    print sum(a)





                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      The adjacent-cell expression a[i+x]for x in[-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6] can be shortened to a[i+j+j/3*2-6]for j in range(9) (the zero entry is harmless). Python 3 can surely do shorter by hardcoding a length-8 bytestring, but Python 2 might still be better overall.
                      $endgroup$
                      – xnor
                      Nov 20 '18 at 3:02






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Though your zero padding loop is clever, it looks like it's shorter to take a 2D list: a=[0]*5 for r in input():a=r+[0]+a. Perhaps there's a yet shorter string slicing solution that doesn't require iterating.
                      $endgroup$
                      – xnor
                      Nov 20 '18 at 3:33
















                    11












                    $begingroup$


                    Python 2, 133 130 bytes





                    a=input();m=16
                    for i in range(m):a[i*5:i*5]=0,
                    while m:i=a.index(m);a[i]=0;m=max(a[i+x]for x in[-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6])
                    print sum(a)


                    Try it online!



                    Takes a flattened list of 16 elements.



                    How it works



                    a=input();m=16

                    # Add zero padding on each row, and enough zeroes at the end to avoid index error
                    for i in range(m):a[i*5:i*5]=0,

                    # m == maximum element found in last iteration
                    # i == index of last eaten element
                    # eaten elements of `a` are reset to 0
                    while m:i=a.index(m);a[i]=0;m=max(a[i+x]for x in[-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6])
                    print sum(a)





                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      The adjacent-cell expression a[i+x]for x in[-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6] can be shortened to a[i+j+j/3*2-6]for j in range(9) (the zero entry is harmless). Python 3 can surely do shorter by hardcoding a length-8 bytestring, but Python 2 might still be better overall.
                      $endgroup$
                      – xnor
                      Nov 20 '18 at 3:02






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Though your zero padding loop is clever, it looks like it's shorter to take a 2D list: a=[0]*5 for r in input():a=r+[0]+a. Perhaps there's a yet shorter string slicing solution that doesn't require iterating.
                      $endgroup$
                      – xnor
                      Nov 20 '18 at 3:33














                    11












                    11








                    11





                    $begingroup$


                    Python 2, 133 130 bytes





                    a=input();m=16
                    for i in range(m):a[i*5:i*5]=0,
                    while m:i=a.index(m);a[i]=0;m=max(a[i+x]for x in[-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6])
                    print sum(a)


                    Try it online!



                    Takes a flattened list of 16 elements.



                    How it works



                    a=input();m=16

                    # Add zero padding on each row, and enough zeroes at the end to avoid index error
                    for i in range(m):a[i*5:i*5]=0,

                    # m == maximum element found in last iteration
                    # i == index of last eaten element
                    # eaten elements of `a` are reset to 0
                    while m:i=a.index(m);a[i]=0;m=max(a[i+x]for x in[-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6])
                    print sum(a)





                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$




                    Python 2, 133 130 bytes





                    a=input();m=16
                    for i in range(m):a[i*5:i*5]=0,
                    while m:i=a.index(m);a[i]=0;m=max(a[i+x]for x in[-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6])
                    print sum(a)


                    Try it online!



                    Takes a flattened list of 16 elements.



                    How it works



                    a=input();m=16

                    # Add zero padding on each row, and enough zeroes at the end to avoid index error
                    for i in range(m):a[i*5:i*5]=0,

                    # m == maximum element found in last iteration
                    # i == index of last eaten element
                    # eaten elements of `a` are reset to 0
                    while m:i=a.index(m);a[i]=0;m=max(a[i+x]for x in[-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6])
                    print sum(a)






                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Nov 20 '18 at 2:38

























                    answered Nov 20 '18 at 0:07









                    BubblerBubbler

                    6,412759




                    6,412759












                    • $begingroup$
                      The adjacent-cell expression a[i+x]for x in[-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6] can be shortened to a[i+j+j/3*2-6]for j in range(9) (the zero entry is harmless). Python 3 can surely do shorter by hardcoding a length-8 bytestring, but Python 2 might still be better overall.
                      $endgroup$
                      – xnor
                      Nov 20 '18 at 3:02






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Though your zero padding loop is clever, it looks like it's shorter to take a 2D list: a=[0]*5 for r in input():a=r+[0]+a. Perhaps there's a yet shorter string slicing solution that doesn't require iterating.
                      $endgroup$
                      – xnor
                      Nov 20 '18 at 3:33


















                    • $begingroup$
                      The adjacent-cell expression a[i+x]for x in[-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6] can be shortened to a[i+j+j/3*2-6]for j in range(9) (the zero entry is harmless). Python 3 can surely do shorter by hardcoding a length-8 bytestring, but Python 2 might still be better overall.
                      $endgroup$
                      – xnor
                      Nov 20 '18 at 3:02






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Though your zero padding loop is clever, it looks like it's shorter to take a 2D list: a=[0]*5 for r in input():a=r+[0]+a. Perhaps there's a yet shorter string slicing solution that doesn't require iterating.
                      $endgroup$
                      – xnor
                      Nov 20 '18 at 3:33
















                    $begingroup$
                    The adjacent-cell expression a[i+x]for x in[-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6] can be shortened to a[i+j+j/3*2-6]for j in range(9) (the zero entry is harmless). Python 3 can surely do shorter by hardcoding a length-8 bytestring, but Python 2 might still be better overall.
                    $endgroup$
                    – xnor
                    Nov 20 '18 at 3:02




                    $begingroup$
                    The adjacent-cell expression a[i+x]for x in[-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6] can be shortened to a[i+j+j/3*2-6]for j in range(9) (the zero entry is harmless). Python 3 can surely do shorter by hardcoding a length-8 bytestring, but Python 2 might still be better overall.
                    $endgroup$
                    – xnor
                    Nov 20 '18 at 3:02




                    1




                    1




                    $begingroup$
                    Though your zero padding loop is clever, it looks like it's shorter to take a 2D list: a=[0]*5 for r in input():a=r+[0]+a. Perhaps there's a yet shorter string slicing solution that doesn't require iterating.
                    $endgroup$
                    – xnor
                    Nov 20 '18 at 3:33




                    $begingroup$
                    Though your zero padding loop is clever, it looks like it's shorter to take a 2D list: a=[0]*5 for r in input():a=r+[0]+a. Perhaps there's a yet shorter string slicing solution that doesn't require iterating.
                    $endgroup$
                    – xnor
                    Nov 20 '18 at 3:33











                    8












                    $begingroup$


                    Python 2, 111 bytes





                    i=x=a=input()
                    while x:x,i=max((y,j)for j,y in enumerate(a)if i>or 2>i/4-j/4>-2<i%4-j%4<2);a[i]=0
                    print sum(a)


                    Try it online!



                    Method and test cases adapted from Bubbler. Takes a flat list on STDIN.



                    The code checks whether two flat indices i and j represent touching cells by checking that both row different i/4-j/4 and column difference i%4-j%4 are strictly between -2 and 2. The first pass instead has this check automatically succeed so that the largest entry is found disregarding adjacency.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$


















                      8












                      $begingroup$


                      Python 2, 111 bytes





                      i=x=a=input()
                      while x:x,i=max((y,j)for j,y in enumerate(a)if i>or 2>i/4-j/4>-2<i%4-j%4<2);a[i]=0
                      print sum(a)


                      Try it online!



                      Method and test cases adapted from Bubbler. Takes a flat list on STDIN.



                      The code checks whether two flat indices i and j represent touching cells by checking that both row different i/4-j/4 and column difference i%4-j%4 are strictly between -2 and 2. The first pass instead has this check automatically succeed so that the largest entry is found disregarding adjacency.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$
















                        8












                        8








                        8





                        $begingroup$


                        Python 2, 111 bytes





                        i=x=a=input()
                        while x:x,i=max((y,j)for j,y in enumerate(a)if i>or 2>i/4-j/4>-2<i%4-j%4<2);a[i]=0
                        print sum(a)


                        Try it online!



                        Method and test cases adapted from Bubbler. Takes a flat list on STDIN.



                        The code checks whether two flat indices i and j represent touching cells by checking that both row different i/4-j/4 and column difference i%4-j%4 are strictly between -2 and 2. The first pass instead has this check automatically succeed so that the largest entry is found disregarding adjacency.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$




                        Python 2, 111 bytes





                        i=x=a=input()
                        while x:x,i=max((y,j)for j,y in enumerate(a)if i>or 2>i/4-j/4>-2<i%4-j%4<2);a[i]=0
                        print sum(a)


                        Try it online!



                        Method and test cases adapted from Bubbler. Takes a flat list on STDIN.



                        The code checks whether two flat indices i and j represent touching cells by checking that both row different i/4-j/4 and column difference i%4-j%4 are strictly between -2 and 2. The first pass instead has this check automatically succeed so that the largest entry is found disregarding adjacency.







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered Nov 20 '18 at 2:47









                        xnorxnor

                        90.5k18185439




                        90.5k18185439























                            8












                            $begingroup$


                            MATL, 50 49 47 bytes



                            16:HZ^!"2G@m1ZIm~]v16eXK68E16b"Ky0)Y)fyX-X>h]s-


                            Input is a matrix, using ; as row separator.



                            Try it online! Or verify all test cases.



                            Explanation



                            16:HZ^!  % Cartesian power of [1 2 ... 16] with exponent 2, transpose. Gives a 
                            % 2-row matrix with 1st column [1; 1], 2nd [1; 2], ..., last [16; 16]
                            " % For each column, say [k; j]
                            2 % Push 2
                            G@m % Push input matrix, then current column [k; j], then check membership.
                            % This gives a 4×4 matrix that contains 1 for entries of the input that
                            % contain k or j
                            1ZI % Connected components (based on 8-neighbourhood) of nonzero entries.
                            % This gives a 4×4 matrix with each connected component labeled with
                            % values 1, 2, ... respectively
                            m~ % True if 2 is not present in this matrix. That means there is only
                            % one connected component; that is, k and j are neighbours in the
                            % input matrix, or k=j
                            ] % End
                            v16e % The stack now has 256 values. Concatenate them into a vector and
                            % reshape as a 16×16 matrix. This matrix describes neighbourhood: entry
                            % (k,j) is 1 if values k and j are neighbours in the input or if k=j
                            XK % Copy into clipboard K
                            68E % Push 68 times 2, that is, 136, which is 1+2+...+16
                            16 % Push 16. This is the initial value eaten by the mouse. New values will
                            % be appended to create a vector of eaten values
                            b % Bubble up the 16×16 matrix to the top of the stack
                            " % For each column. This just executes the loop 16 times
                            K % Push neighbourhood matrix from clipboard K
                            y % Copy from below: pushes a copy of the vector of eaten values
                            0) % Get last value. This is the most recent eaten value
                            Y) % Get that row of the neighbourhood matrix
                            f % Indices of nonzeros. This gives a vector of neighbours of the last
                            % eaten value
                            y % Copy from below: pushes a copy of the vector of eaten values
                            X- % Set difference (may give an empty result)
                            X> % Maximum value. This is the new eaten value (maximum neighbour not
                            % already eaten). May be empty, if all neighbours are already eaten
                            h % Concatenate to vector of eaten values
                            ] % End
                            s % Sum of vector of all eaten values
                            - % Subtract from 136. Implicitly display





                            share|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$













                            • $begingroup$
                              Idk MatLab, but can you save a little if you push -136 instead of +136?
                              $endgroup$
                              – Titus
                              Nov 21 '18 at 1:31










                            • $begingroup$
                              @Titus Hm I don't see how
                              $endgroup$
                              – Luis Mendo
                              Nov 21 '18 at 9:20










                            • $begingroup$
                              or the other way round: I thought instead of 1) push 136 2) push each eaten value 3) sum up eaten values 4) subtract from 136 -> 1) push 136 2) push negative of eaten value 3) sum up stack. But as it obviously is only one byte each; it´s probably no gain.
                              $endgroup$
                              – Titus
                              Nov 21 '18 at 13:33










                            • $begingroup$
                              @Titus Ah, yes, I think that uses the same number of bytes. Also, I need each eaten value (not its negative) for the set difference; negating would have to be done at the end
                              $endgroup$
                              – Luis Mendo
                              Nov 21 '18 at 13:37


















                            8












                            $begingroup$


                            MATL, 50 49 47 bytes



                            16:HZ^!"2G@m1ZIm~]v16eXK68E16b"Ky0)Y)fyX-X>h]s-


                            Input is a matrix, using ; as row separator.



                            Try it online! Or verify all test cases.



                            Explanation



                            16:HZ^!  % Cartesian power of [1 2 ... 16] with exponent 2, transpose. Gives a 
                            % 2-row matrix with 1st column [1; 1], 2nd [1; 2], ..., last [16; 16]
                            " % For each column, say [k; j]
                            2 % Push 2
                            G@m % Push input matrix, then current column [k; j], then check membership.
                            % This gives a 4×4 matrix that contains 1 for entries of the input that
                            % contain k or j
                            1ZI % Connected components (based on 8-neighbourhood) of nonzero entries.
                            % This gives a 4×4 matrix with each connected component labeled with
                            % values 1, 2, ... respectively
                            m~ % True if 2 is not present in this matrix. That means there is only
                            % one connected component; that is, k and j are neighbours in the
                            % input matrix, or k=j
                            ] % End
                            v16e % The stack now has 256 values. Concatenate them into a vector and
                            % reshape as a 16×16 matrix. This matrix describes neighbourhood: entry
                            % (k,j) is 1 if values k and j are neighbours in the input or if k=j
                            XK % Copy into clipboard K
                            68E % Push 68 times 2, that is, 136, which is 1+2+...+16
                            16 % Push 16. This is the initial value eaten by the mouse. New values will
                            % be appended to create a vector of eaten values
                            b % Bubble up the 16×16 matrix to the top of the stack
                            " % For each column. This just executes the loop 16 times
                            K % Push neighbourhood matrix from clipboard K
                            y % Copy from below: pushes a copy of the vector of eaten values
                            0) % Get last value. This is the most recent eaten value
                            Y) % Get that row of the neighbourhood matrix
                            f % Indices of nonzeros. This gives a vector of neighbours of the last
                            % eaten value
                            y % Copy from below: pushes a copy of the vector of eaten values
                            X- % Set difference (may give an empty result)
                            X> % Maximum value. This is the new eaten value (maximum neighbour not
                            % already eaten). May be empty, if all neighbours are already eaten
                            h % Concatenate to vector of eaten values
                            ] % End
                            s % Sum of vector of all eaten values
                            - % Subtract from 136. Implicitly display





                            share|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$













                            • $begingroup$
                              Idk MatLab, but can you save a little if you push -136 instead of +136?
                              $endgroup$
                              – Titus
                              Nov 21 '18 at 1:31










                            • $begingroup$
                              @Titus Hm I don't see how
                              $endgroup$
                              – Luis Mendo
                              Nov 21 '18 at 9:20










                            • $begingroup$
                              or the other way round: I thought instead of 1) push 136 2) push each eaten value 3) sum up eaten values 4) subtract from 136 -> 1) push 136 2) push negative of eaten value 3) sum up stack. But as it obviously is only one byte each; it´s probably no gain.
                              $endgroup$
                              – Titus
                              Nov 21 '18 at 13:33










                            • $begingroup$
                              @Titus Ah, yes, I think that uses the same number of bytes. Also, I need each eaten value (not its negative) for the set difference; negating would have to be done at the end
                              $endgroup$
                              – Luis Mendo
                              Nov 21 '18 at 13:37
















                            8












                            8








                            8





                            $begingroup$


                            MATL, 50 49 47 bytes



                            16:HZ^!"2G@m1ZIm~]v16eXK68E16b"Ky0)Y)fyX-X>h]s-


                            Input is a matrix, using ; as row separator.



                            Try it online! Or verify all test cases.



                            Explanation



                            16:HZ^!  % Cartesian power of [1 2 ... 16] with exponent 2, transpose. Gives a 
                            % 2-row matrix with 1st column [1; 1], 2nd [1; 2], ..., last [16; 16]
                            " % For each column, say [k; j]
                            2 % Push 2
                            G@m % Push input matrix, then current column [k; j], then check membership.
                            % This gives a 4×4 matrix that contains 1 for entries of the input that
                            % contain k or j
                            1ZI % Connected components (based on 8-neighbourhood) of nonzero entries.
                            % This gives a 4×4 matrix with each connected component labeled with
                            % values 1, 2, ... respectively
                            m~ % True if 2 is not present in this matrix. That means there is only
                            % one connected component; that is, k and j are neighbours in the
                            % input matrix, or k=j
                            ] % End
                            v16e % The stack now has 256 values. Concatenate them into a vector and
                            % reshape as a 16×16 matrix. This matrix describes neighbourhood: entry
                            % (k,j) is 1 if values k and j are neighbours in the input or if k=j
                            XK % Copy into clipboard K
                            68E % Push 68 times 2, that is, 136, which is 1+2+...+16
                            16 % Push 16. This is the initial value eaten by the mouse. New values will
                            % be appended to create a vector of eaten values
                            b % Bubble up the 16×16 matrix to the top of the stack
                            " % For each column. This just executes the loop 16 times
                            K % Push neighbourhood matrix from clipboard K
                            y % Copy from below: pushes a copy of the vector of eaten values
                            0) % Get last value. This is the most recent eaten value
                            Y) % Get that row of the neighbourhood matrix
                            f % Indices of nonzeros. This gives a vector of neighbours of the last
                            % eaten value
                            y % Copy from below: pushes a copy of the vector of eaten values
                            X- % Set difference (may give an empty result)
                            X> % Maximum value. This is the new eaten value (maximum neighbour not
                            % already eaten). May be empty, if all neighbours are already eaten
                            h % Concatenate to vector of eaten values
                            ] % End
                            s % Sum of vector of all eaten values
                            - % Subtract from 136. Implicitly display





                            share|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$




                            MATL, 50 49 47 bytes



                            16:HZ^!"2G@m1ZIm~]v16eXK68E16b"Ky0)Y)fyX-X>h]s-


                            Input is a matrix, using ; as row separator.



                            Try it online! Or verify all test cases.



                            Explanation



                            16:HZ^!  % Cartesian power of [1 2 ... 16] with exponent 2, transpose. Gives a 
                            % 2-row matrix with 1st column [1; 1], 2nd [1; 2], ..., last [16; 16]
                            " % For each column, say [k; j]
                            2 % Push 2
                            G@m % Push input matrix, then current column [k; j], then check membership.
                            % This gives a 4×4 matrix that contains 1 for entries of the input that
                            % contain k or j
                            1ZI % Connected components (based on 8-neighbourhood) of nonzero entries.
                            % This gives a 4×4 matrix with each connected component labeled with
                            % values 1, 2, ... respectively
                            m~ % True if 2 is not present in this matrix. That means there is only
                            % one connected component; that is, k and j are neighbours in the
                            % input matrix, or k=j
                            ] % End
                            v16e % The stack now has 256 values. Concatenate them into a vector and
                            % reshape as a 16×16 matrix. This matrix describes neighbourhood: entry
                            % (k,j) is 1 if values k and j are neighbours in the input or if k=j
                            XK % Copy into clipboard K
                            68E % Push 68 times 2, that is, 136, which is 1+2+...+16
                            16 % Push 16. This is the initial value eaten by the mouse. New values will
                            % be appended to create a vector of eaten values
                            b % Bubble up the 16×16 matrix to the top of the stack
                            " % For each column. This just executes the loop 16 times
                            K % Push neighbourhood matrix from clipboard K
                            y % Copy from below: pushes a copy of the vector of eaten values
                            0) % Get last value. This is the most recent eaten value
                            Y) % Get that row of the neighbourhood matrix
                            f % Indices of nonzeros. This gives a vector of neighbours of the last
                            % eaten value
                            y % Copy from below: pushes a copy of the vector of eaten values
                            X- % Set difference (may give an empty result)
                            X> % Maximum value. This is the new eaten value (maximum neighbour not
                            % already eaten). May be empty, if all neighbours are already eaten
                            h % Concatenate to vector of eaten values
                            ] % End
                            s % Sum of vector of all eaten values
                            - % Subtract from 136. Implicitly display






                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Nov 20 '18 at 14:21

























                            answered Nov 19 '18 at 22:38









                            Luis MendoLuis Mendo

                            74.5k887291




                            74.5k887291












                            • $begingroup$
                              Idk MatLab, but can you save a little if you push -136 instead of +136?
                              $endgroup$
                              – Titus
                              Nov 21 '18 at 1:31










                            • $begingroup$
                              @Titus Hm I don't see how
                              $endgroup$
                              – Luis Mendo
                              Nov 21 '18 at 9:20










                            • $begingroup$
                              or the other way round: I thought instead of 1) push 136 2) push each eaten value 3) sum up eaten values 4) subtract from 136 -> 1) push 136 2) push negative of eaten value 3) sum up stack. But as it obviously is only one byte each; it´s probably no gain.
                              $endgroup$
                              – Titus
                              Nov 21 '18 at 13:33










                            • $begingroup$
                              @Titus Ah, yes, I think that uses the same number of bytes. Also, I need each eaten value (not its negative) for the set difference; negating would have to be done at the end
                              $endgroup$
                              – Luis Mendo
                              Nov 21 '18 at 13:37




















                            • $begingroup$
                              Idk MatLab, but can you save a little if you push -136 instead of +136?
                              $endgroup$
                              – Titus
                              Nov 21 '18 at 1:31










                            • $begingroup$
                              @Titus Hm I don't see how
                              $endgroup$
                              – Luis Mendo
                              Nov 21 '18 at 9:20










                            • $begingroup$
                              or the other way round: I thought instead of 1) push 136 2) push each eaten value 3) sum up eaten values 4) subtract from 136 -> 1) push 136 2) push negative of eaten value 3) sum up stack. But as it obviously is only one byte each; it´s probably no gain.
                              $endgroup$
                              – Titus
                              Nov 21 '18 at 13:33










                            • $begingroup$
                              @Titus Ah, yes, I think that uses the same number of bytes. Also, I need each eaten value (not its negative) for the set difference; negating would have to be done at the end
                              $endgroup$
                              – Luis Mendo
                              Nov 21 '18 at 13:37


















                            $begingroup$
                            Idk MatLab, but can you save a little if you push -136 instead of +136?
                            $endgroup$
                            – Titus
                            Nov 21 '18 at 1:31




                            $begingroup$
                            Idk MatLab, but can you save a little if you push -136 instead of +136?
                            $endgroup$
                            – Titus
                            Nov 21 '18 at 1:31












                            $begingroup$
                            @Titus Hm I don't see how
                            $endgroup$
                            – Luis Mendo
                            Nov 21 '18 at 9:20




                            $begingroup$
                            @Titus Hm I don't see how
                            $endgroup$
                            – Luis Mendo
                            Nov 21 '18 at 9:20












                            $begingroup$
                            or the other way round: I thought instead of 1) push 136 2) push each eaten value 3) sum up eaten values 4) subtract from 136 -> 1) push 136 2) push negative of eaten value 3) sum up stack. But as it obviously is only one byte each; it´s probably no gain.
                            $endgroup$
                            – Titus
                            Nov 21 '18 at 13:33




                            $begingroup$
                            or the other way round: I thought instead of 1) push 136 2) push each eaten value 3) sum up eaten values 4) subtract from 136 -> 1) push 136 2) push negative of eaten value 3) sum up stack. But as it obviously is only one byte each; it´s probably no gain.
                            $endgroup$
                            – Titus
                            Nov 21 '18 at 13:33












                            $begingroup$
                            @Titus Ah, yes, I think that uses the same number of bytes. Also, I need each eaten value (not its negative) for the set difference; negating would have to be done at the end
                            $endgroup$
                            – Luis Mendo
                            Nov 21 '18 at 13:37






                            $begingroup$
                            @Titus Ah, yes, I think that uses the same number of bytes. Also, I need each eaten value (not its negative) for the set difference; negating would have to be done at the end
                            $endgroup$
                            – Luis Mendo
                            Nov 21 '18 at 13:37













                            6












                            $begingroup$

                            PHP, 177 174 171 bytes



                            for($v=16;$v;$u+=$v=max($p%4-1?max($a[$p-5],$a[$p-1],$a[$p+3]):0,$a[$p-4],$a[$p+4],$p%4?max($a[$p-3],$a[$p+1],$a[$p+5]):0))$a[$p=array_search($v,$a=&$argv)]=0;echo 120-$u;


                            Run with -nr, provide matrix elements as arguments or try it online.






                            share|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$


















                              6












                              $begingroup$

                              PHP, 177 174 171 bytes



                              for($v=16;$v;$u+=$v=max($p%4-1?max($a[$p-5],$a[$p-1],$a[$p+3]):0,$a[$p-4],$a[$p+4],$p%4?max($a[$p-3],$a[$p+1],$a[$p+5]):0))$a[$p=array_search($v,$a=&$argv)]=0;echo 120-$u;


                              Run with -nr, provide matrix elements as arguments or try it online.






                              share|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$
















                                6












                                6








                                6





                                $begingroup$

                                PHP, 177 174 171 bytes



                                for($v=16;$v;$u+=$v=max($p%4-1?max($a[$p-5],$a[$p-1],$a[$p+3]):0,$a[$p-4],$a[$p+4],$p%4?max($a[$p-3],$a[$p+1],$a[$p+5]):0))$a[$p=array_search($v,$a=&$argv)]=0;echo 120-$u;


                                Run with -nr, provide matrix elements as arguments or try it online.






                                share|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$



                                PHP, 177 174 171 bytes



                                for($v=16;$v;$u+=$v=max($p%4-1?max($a[$p-5],$a[$p-1],$a[$p+3]):0,$a[$p-4],$a[$p+4],$p%4?max($a[$p-3],$a[$p+1],$a[$p+5]):0))$a[$p=array_search($v,$a=&$argv)]=0;echo 120-$u;


                                Run with -nr, provide matrix elements as arguments or try it online.







                                share|improve this answer














                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer








                                edited Nov 20 '18 at 0:13

























                                answered Nov 19 '18 at 23:03









                                TitusTitus

                                13.1k11238




                                13.1k11238























                                    5












                                    $begingroup$


                                    R, 128 124 123 bytes





                                    r=rbind(0,cbind(0,matrix(scan(),4,4),0),0)
                                    m=which(r>15)
                                    while(r[m]){r[m]=0
                                    m=which(r==max(r[m+c(-7:-5,-1,1,5:7)]))}
                                    sum(r)


                                    Try it online!



                                    TIO link is slightly different, I am still trying to figure out how to make it work.



                                    I do feel like I can golf a lot more out of this. But this works for now.



                                    It creates a 4x4 matrix (which helped me to visualize things), pads it with 0's, then begins from 16 and searches it's surrounding "piles" for the next largest, and so forth.



                                    Upon conclusion, it does output a warning, but it is of no consequence and does not change the result.



                                    EDIT: -4 bytes by compressing the initialization of the matrix into 1 line.



                                    EDIT: -1 thanks to Robert Hacken






                                    share|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$













                                    • $begingroup$
                                      You can save one byte changing r==16 for r>15.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Robert Hacken
                                      Nov 24 '18 at 23:41










                                    • $begingroup$
                                      117 bytes -- change it to a function taking a matrix and do some aliasing with the which.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Giuseppe
                                      Nov 27 '18 at 15:32
















                                    5












                                    $begingroup$


                                    R, 128 124 123 bytes





                                    r=rbind(0,cbind(0,matrix(scan(),4,4),0),0)
                                    m=which(r>15)
                                    while(r[m]){r[m]=0
                                    m=which(r==max(r[m+c(-7:-5,-1,1,5:7)]))}
                                    sum(r)


                                    Try it online!



                                    TIO link is slightly different, I am still trying to figure out how to make it work.



                                    I do feel like I can golf a lot more out of this. But this works for now.



                                    It creates a 4x4 matrix (which helped me to visualize things), pads it with 0's, then begins from 16 and searches it's surrounding "piles" for the next largest, and so forth.



                                    Upon conclusion, it does output a warning, but it is of no consequence and does not change the result.



                                    EDIT: -4 bytes by compressing the initialization of the matrix into 1 line.



                                    EDIT: -1 thanks to Robert Hacken






                                    share|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$













                                    • $begingroup$
                                      You can save one byte changing r==16 for r>15.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Robert Hacken
                                      Nov 24 '18 at 23:41










                                    • $begingroup$
                                      117 bytes -- change it to a function taking a matrix and do some aliasing with the which.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Giuseppe
                                      Nov 27 '18 at 15:32














                                    5












                                    5








                                    5





                                    $begingroup$


                                    R, 128 124 123 bytes





                                    r=rbind(0,cbind(0,matrix(scan(),4,4),0),0)
                                    m=which(r>15)
                                    while(r[m]){r[m]=0
                                    m=which(r==max(r[m+c(-7:-5,-1,1,5:7)]))}
                                    sum(r)


                                    Try it online!



                                    TIO link is slightly different, I am still trying to figure out how to make it work.



                                    I do feel like I can golf a lot more out of this. But this works for now.



                                    It creates a 4x4 matrix (which helped me to visualize things), pads it with 0's, then begins from 16 and searches it's surrounding "piles" for the next largest, and so forth.



                                    Upon conclusion, it does output a warning, but it is of no consequence and does not change the result.



                                    EDIT: -4 bytes by compressing the initialization of the matrix into 1 line.



                                    EDIT: -1 thanks to Robert Hacken






                                    share|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$




                                    R, 128 124 123 bytes





                                    r=rbind(0,cbind(0,matrix(scan(),4,4),0),0)
                                    m=which(r>15)
                                    while(r[m]){r[m]=0
                                    m=which(r==max(r[m+c(-7:-5,-1,1,5:7)]))}
                                    sum(r)


                                    Try it online!



                                    TIO link is slightly different, I am still trying to figure out how to make it work.



                                    I do feel like I can golf a lot more out of this. But this works for now.



                                    It creates a 4x4 matrix (which helped me to visualize things), pads it with 0's, then begins from 16 and searches it's surrounding "piles" for the next largest, and so forth.



                                    Upon conclusion, it does output a warning, but it is of no consequence and does not change the result.



                                    EDIT: -4 bytes by compressing the initialization of the matrix into 1 line.



                                    EDIT: -1 thanks to Robert Hacken







                                    share|improve this answer














                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer








                                    edited Nov 26 '18 at 15:12

























                                    answered Nov 20 '18 at 21:01









                                    Sumner18Sumner18

                                    5107




                                    5107












                                    • $begingroup$
                                      You can save one byte changing r==16 for r>15.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Robert Hacken
                                      Nov 24 '18 at 23:41










                                    • $begingroup$
                                      117 bytes -- change it to a function taking a matrix and do some aliasing with the which.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Giuseppe
                                      Nov 27 '18 at 15:32


















                                    • $begingroup$
                                      You can save one byte changing r==16 for r>15.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Robert Hacken
                                      Nov 24 '18 at 23:41










                                    • $begingroup$
                                      117 bytes -- change it to a function taking a matrix and do some aliasing with the which.
                                      $endgroup$
                                      – Giuseppe
                                      Nov 27 '18 at 15:32
















                                    $begingroup$
                                    You can save one byte changing r==16 for r>15.
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – Robert Hacken
                                    Nov 24 '18 at 23:41




                                    $begingroup$
                                    You can save one byte changing r==16 for r>15.
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – Robert Hacken
                                    Nov 24 '18 at 23:41












                                    $begingroup$
                                    117 bytes -- change it to a function taking a matrix and do some aliasing with the which.
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – Giuseppe
                                    Nov 27 '18 at 15:32




                                    $begingroup$
                                    117 bytes -- change it to a function taking a matrix and do some aliasing with the which.
                                    $endgroup$
                                    – Giuseppe
                                    Nov 27 '18 at 15:32











                                    4












                                    $begingroup$


                                    Charcoal, 47 bytes



                                    EA⭆ι§αλ≔QθW›θA«≔⌕KAθθJ﹪θ⁴÷θ⁴≔⌈KMθA»≔ΣEKA⌕αιθ⎚Iθ


                                    Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                                    EA⭆ι§αλ


                                    Convert the input numbers into alphabetic characters (A=0 .. Q=16) and print them as a 4x4 grid.



                                    ≔Qθ


                                    Start by eating the Q, i.e. 16.



                                    W›θA«


                                    Repeat while there is something to eat.



                                    ≔⌕KAθθ


                                    Find where the pile is. This is a linear view in row-major order.



                                    J﹪θ⁴÷θ⁴


                                    Convert to co-ordinates and jump to that location.



                                    ≔⌈KMθ


                                    Find the largest adjacent pile.






                                    Eat the current pile.



                                    ≔ΣEKA⌕αιθ


                                    Convert the piles back to integers and take the sum.



                                    ⎚Iθ


                                    Clear the canvas and output the result.






                                    share|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$


















                                      4












                                      $begingroup$


                                      Charcoal, 47 bytes



                                      EA⭆ι§αλ≔QθW›θA«≔⌕KAθθJ﹪θ⁴÷θ⁴≔⌈KMθA»≔ΣEKA⌕αιθ⎚Iθ


                                      Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                                      EA⭆ι§αλ


                                      Convert the input numbers into alphabetic characters (A=0 .. Q=16) and print them as a 4x4 grid.



                                      ≔Qθ


                                      Start by eating the Q, i.e. 16.



                                      W›θA«


                                      Repeat while there is something to eat.



                                      ≔⌕KAθθ


                                      Find where the pile is. This is a linear view in row-major order.



                                      J﹪θ⁴÷θ⁴


                                      Convert to co-ordinates and jump to that location.



                                      ≔⌈KMθ


                                      Find the largest adjacent pile.






                                      Eat the current pile.



                                      ≔ΣEKA⌕αιθ


                                      Convert the piles back to integers and take the sum.



                                      ⎚Iθ


                                      Clear the canvas and output the result.






                                      share|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$
















                                        4












                                        4








                                        4





                                        $begingroup$


                                        Charcoal, 47 bytes



                                        EA⭆ι§αλ≔QθW›θA«≔⌕KAθθJ﹪θ⁴÷θ⁴≔⌈KMθA»≔ΣEKA⌕αιθ⎚Iθ


                                        Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                                        EA⭆ι§αλ


                                        Convert the input numbers into alphabetic characters (A=0 .. Q=16) and print them as a 4x4 grid.



                                        ≔Qθ


                                        Start by eating the Q, i.e. 16.



                                        W›θA«


                                        Repeat while there is something to eat.



                                        ≔⌕KAθθ


                                        Find where the pile is. This is a linear view in row-major order.



                                        J﹪θ⁴÷θ⁴


                                        Convert to co-ordinates and jump to that location.



                                        ≔⌈KMθ


                                        Find the largest adjacent pile.






                                        Eat the current pile.



                                        ≔ΣEKA⌕αιθ


                                        Convert the piles back to integers and take the sum.



                                        ⎚Iθ


                                        Clear the canvas and output the result.






                                        share|improve this answer









                                        $endgroup$




                                        Charcoal, 47 bytes



                                        EA⭆ι§αλ≔QθW›θA«≔⌕KAθθJ﹪θ⁴÷θ⁴≔⌈KMθA»≔ΣEKA⌕αιθ⎚Iθ


                                        Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                                        EA⭆ι§αλ


                                        Convert the input numbers into alphabetic characters (A=0 .. Q=16) and print them as a 4x4 grid.



                                        ≔Qθ


                                        Start by eating the Q, i.e. 16.



                                        W›θA«


                                        Repeat while there is something to eat.



                                        ≔⌕KAθθ


                                        Find where the pile is. This is a linear view in row-major order.



                                        J﹪θ⁴÷θ⁴


                                        Convert to co-ordinates and jump to that location.



                                        ≔⌈KMθ


                                        Find the largest adjacent pile.






                                        Eat the current pile.



                                        ≔ΣEKA⌕αιθ


                                        Convert the piles back to integers and take the sum.



                                        ⎚Iθ


                                        Clear the canvas and output the result.







                                        share|improve this answer












                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer










                                        answered Nov 20 '18 at 10:17









                                        NeilNeil

                                        80.7k744178




                                        80.7k744178























                                            4












                                            $begingroup$

                                            JavaScript, 122 bytes



                                            I took more than a couple of wrong turns on this one and now I've run out of time for further golfing but at least it's working. Will revisit tomorrow (or, knowing me, on the train home this evening!), if I can find a minute.



                                            a=>(g=n=>n?g([-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6].map(x=>n=a[x+=i]>n?a[x]:n,a[i=a.indexOf(n)]=n=0)|n)-n:120)(16,a=a.flatMap(x=>[...x,0]))


                                            Try it online






                                            share|improve this answer









                                            $endgroup$









                                            • 3




                                              $begingroup$
                                              +1 for flatMap() :p
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Nov 20 '18 at 17:29










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              :D I think this is the first time I've used it for golf! Out of interest (and to give me a target when I come back to this), what was your score when you tried it?
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Shaggy
                                              Nov 20 '18 at 17:46










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              Didn't get a minute to come back to this today. Hopefully that means I'll be able to start over with completely fresh eyes tomorrow.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Shaggy
                                              Nov 21 '18 at 17:14










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              I've posted my solution.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Dec 13 '18 at 15:13
















                                            4












                                            $begingroup$

                                            JavaScript, 122 bytes



                                            I took more than a couple of wrong turns on this one and now I've run out of time for further golfing but at least it's working. Will revisit tomorrow (or, knowing me, on the train home this evening!), if I can find a minute.



                                            a=>(g=n=>n?g([-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6].map(x=>n=a[x+=i]>n?a[x]:n,a[i=a.indexOf(n)]=n=0)|n)-n:120)(16,a=a.flatMap(x=>[...x,0]))


                                            Try it online






                                            share|improve this answer









                                            $endgroup$









                                            • 3




                                              $begingroup$
                                              +1 for flatMap() :p
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Nov 20 '18 at 17:29










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              :D I think this is the first time I've used it for golf! Out of interest (and to give me a target when I come back to this), what was your score when you tried it?
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Shaggy
                                              Nov 20 '18 at 17:46










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              Didn't get a minute to come back to this today. Hopefully that means I'll be able to start over with completely fresh eyes tomorrow.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Shaggy
                                              Nov 21 '18 at 17:14










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              I've posted my solution.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Dec 13 '18 at 15:13














                                            4












                                            4








                                            4





                                            $begingroup$

                                            JavaScript, 122 bytes



                                            I took more than a couple of wrong turns on this one and now I've run out of time for further golfing but at least it's working. Will revisit tomorrow (or, knowing me, on the train home this evening!), if I can find a minute.



                                            a=>(g=n=>n?g([-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6].map(x=>n=a[x+=i]>n?a[x]:n,a[i=a.indexOf(n)]=n=0)|n)-n:120)(16,a=a.flatMap(x=>[...x,0]))


                                            Try it online






                                            share|improve this answer









                                            $endgroup$



                                            JavaScript, 122 bytes



                                            I took more than a couple of wrong turns on this one and now I've run out of time for further golfing but at least it's working. Will revisit tomorrow (or, knowing me, on the train home this evening!), if I can find a minute.



                                            a=>(g=n=>n?g([-6,-5,-4,-1,1,4,5,6].map(x=>n=a[x+=i]>n?a[x]:n,a[i=a.indexOf(n)]=n=0)|n)-n:120)(16,a=a.flatMap(x=>[...x,0]))


                                            Try it online







                                            share|improve this answer












                                            share|improve this answer



                                            share|improve this answer










                                            answered Nov 20 '18 at 17:25









                                            ShaggyShaggy

                                            19.9k21667




                                            19.9k21667








                                            • 3




                                              $begingroup$
                                              +1 for flatMap() :p
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Nov 20 '18 at 17:29










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              :D I think this is the first time I've used it for golf! Out of interest (and to give me a target when I come back to this), what was your score when you tried it?
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Shaggy
                                              Nov 20 '18 at 17:46










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              Didn't get a minute to come back to this today. Hopefully that means I'll be able to start over with completely fresh eyes tomorrow.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Shaggy
                                              Nov 21 '18 at 17:14










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              I've posted my solution.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Dec 13 '18 at 15:13














                                            • 3




                                              $begingroup$
                                              +1 for flatMap() :p
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Nov 20 '18 at 17:29










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              :D I think this is the first time I've used it for golf! Out of interest (and to give me a target when I come back to this), what was your score when you tried it?
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Shaggy
                                              Nov 20 '18 at 17:46










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              Didn't get a minute to come back to this today. Hopefully that means I'll be able to start over with completely fresh eyes tomorrow.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Shaggy
                                              Nov 21 '18 at 17:14










                                            • $begingroup$
                                              I've posted my solution.
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Dec 13 '18 at 15:13








                                            3




                                            3




                                            $begingroup$
                                            +1 for flatMap() :p
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Arnauld
                                            Nov 20 '18 at 17:29




                                            $begingroup$
                                            +1 for flatMap() :p
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Arnauld
                                            Nov 20 '18 at 17:29












                                            $begingroup$
                                            :D I think this is the first time I've used it for golf! Out of interest (and to give me a target when I come back to this), what was your score when you tried it?
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Shaggy
                                            Nov 20 '18 at 17:46




                                            $begingroup$
                                            :D I think this is the first time I've used it for golf! Out of interest (and to give me a target when I come back to this), what was your score when you tried it?
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Shaggy
                                            Nov 20 '18 at 17:46












                                            $begingroup$
                                            Didn't get a minute to come back to this today. Hopefully that means I'll be able to start over with completely fresh eyes tomorrow.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Shaggy
                                            Nov 21 '18 at 17:14




                                            $begingroup$
                                            Didn't get a minute to come back to this today. Hopefully that means I'll be able to start over with completely fresh eyes tomorrow.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Shaggy
                                            Nov 21 '18 at 17:14












                                            $begingroup$
                                            I've posted my solution.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Arnauld
                                            Dec 13 '18 at 15:13




                                            $begingroup$
                                            I've posted my solution.
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Arnauld
                                            Dec 13 '18 at 15:13











                                            3












                                            $begingroup$

                                            SAS, 236 219 bytes



                                            Input on punch cards, one line per grid (space-separated), output printed to the log.



                                            This challenge is slightly complicated by some limitations of arrays in SAS:




                                            • There is no way to return the row and column indexes of a matching element from multidimensional data-step array - you have to treat the array as 1-d and then work them out for yourself.

                                            • If you go out of bounds, SAS throws an error and halts processing rather than returning null / zero.


                                            Updates:




                                            • Removed infile cards; statement (-13)

                                            • Used wildcard a: for array definition rather than a1-a16 (-4)


                                            Golfed:



                                            data;input a1-a16;array a[4,4]a:;p=16;t=136;do while(p);m=whichn(p,of a:);t=t-p;j=mod(m-1,4)+1;i=ceil(m/4);a[i,j]=0;p=0;do k=max(1,i-1)to min(i+1,4);do l=max(1,j-1)to min(j+1,4);p=max(p,a[k,l]);end;end;end;put t;cards;
                                            <insert punch cards here>
                                            ;


                                            Ungolfed:



                                            data;                /*Produce a dataset using automatic naming*/
                                            input a1-a16; /*Read 16 variables*/
                                            array a[4,4] a:; /*Assign to a 4x4 array*/
                                            p=16; /*Initial pile to look for*/
                                            t=136; /*Total cheese to decrement*/
                                            do while(p); /*Stop if there are no piles available with size > 0*/
                                            m=whichn(p,of a:); /*Find array element containing current pile size*/
                                            t=t-p; /*Decrement total cheese*/
                                            j=mod(m-1,4)+1; /*Get column number*/
                                            i=ceil(m/4); /*Get row number*/
                                            a[i,j]=0; /*Eat the current pile*/
                                            /*Find the size of the largest adjacent pile*/
                                            p=0;
                                            do k=max(1,i-1)to min(i+1,4);
                                            do l=max(1,j-1)to min(j+1,4);
                                            p=max(p,a[k,l]);
                                            end;
                                            end;
                                            end;
                                            put t; /*Print total remaining cheese to log*/
                                            /*Start of punch card input*/
                                            cards;
                                            4 3 2 1 5 6 7 8 12 11 10 9 13 14 15 16
                                            8 1 9 14 11 6 5 16 13 15 2 7 10 3 12 4
                                            1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
                                            10 15 14 11 9 3 1 7 13 5 12 6 2 8 4 16
                                            3 7 10 5 6 8 12 13 15 9 11 4 14 1 16 2
                                            8 9 3 6 13 11 7 15 12 10 16 2 4 14 1 5
                                            8 11 12 9 14 5 10 16 7 3 1 6 13 4 2 15
                                            13 14 1 2 16 15 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
                                            9 10 11 12 1 2 4 13 7 8 5 14 3 16 6 15
                                            9 10 11 12 1 2 7 13 6 16 4 14 3 8 5 15
                                            ; /*End of punch card input*/
                                            /*Implicit run;*/





                                            share|improve this answer











                                            $endgroup$









                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              +1 for use of punch cards in PPCG :)
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – GNiklasch
                                              Nov 20 '18 at 18:25
















                                            3












                                            $begingroup$

                                            SAS, 236 219 bytes



                                            Input on punch cards, one line per grid (space-separated), output printed to the log.



                                            This challenge is slightly complicated by some limitations of arrays in SAS:




                                            • There is no way to return the row and column indexes of a matching element from multidimensional data-step array - you have to treat the array as 1-d and then work them out for yourself.

                                            • If you go out of bounds, SAS throws an error and halts processing rather than returning null / zero.


                                            Updates:




                                            • Removed infile cards; statement (-13)

                                            • Used wildcard a: for array definition rather than a1-a16 (-4)


                                            Golfed:



                                            data;input a1-a16;array a[4,4]a:;p=16;t=136;do while(p);m=whichn(p,of a:);t=t-p;j=mod(m-1,4)+1;i=ceil(m/4);a[i,j]=0;p=0;do k=max(1,i-1)to min(i+1,4);do l=max(1,j-1)to min(j+1,4);p=max(p,a[k,l]);end;end;end;put t;cards;
                                            <insert punch cards here>
                                            ;


                                            Ungolfed:



                                            data;                /*Produce a dataset using automatic naming*/
                                            input a1-a16; /*Read 16 variables*/
                                            array a[4,4] a:; /*Assign to a 4x4 array*/
                                            p=16; /*Initial pile to look for*/
                                            t=136; /*Total cheese to decrement*/
                                            do while(p); /*Stop if there are no piles available with size > 0*/
                                            m=whichn(p,of a:); /*Find array element containing current pile size*/
                                            t=t-p; /*Decrement total cheese*/
                                            j=mod(m-1,4)+1; /*Get column number*/
                                            i=ceil(m/4); /*Get row number*/
                                            a[i,j]=0; /*Eat the current pile*/
                                            /*Find the size of the largest adjacent pile*/
                                            p=0;
                                            do k=max(1,i-1)to min(i+1,4);
                                            do l=max(1,j-1)to min(j+1,4);
                                            p=max(p,a[k,l]);
                                            end;
                                            end;
                                            end;
                                            put t; /*Print total remaining cheese to log*/
                                            /*Start of punch card input*/
                                            cards;
                                            4 3 2 1 5 6 7 8 12 11 10 9 13 14 15 16
                                            8 1 9 14 11 6 5 16 13 15 2 7 10 3 12 4
                                            1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
                                            10 15 14 11 9 3 1 7 13 5 12 6 2 8 4 16
                                            3 7 10 5 6 8 12 13 15 9 11 4 14 1 16 2
                                            8 9 3 6 13 11 7 15 12 10 16 2 4 14 1 5
                                            8 11 12 9 14 5 10 16 7 3 1 6 13 4 2 15
                                            13 14 1 2 16 15 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
                                            9 10 11 12 1 2 4 13 7 8 5 14 3 16 6 15
                                            9 10 11 12 1 2 7 13 6 16 4 14 3 8 5 15
                                            ; /*End of punch card input*/
                                            /*Implicit run;*/





                                            share|improve this answer











                                            $endgroup$









                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              +1 for use of punch cards in PPCG :)
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – GNiklasch
                                              Nov 20 '18 at 18:25














                                            3












                                            3








                                            3





                                            $begingroup$

                                            SAS, 236 219 bytes



                                            Input on punch cards, one line per grid (space-separated), output printed to the log.



                                            This challenge is slightly complicated by some limitations of arrays in SAS:




                                            • There is no way to return the row and column indexes of a matching element from multidimensional data-step array - you have to treat the array as 1-d and then work them out for yourself.

                                            • If you go out of bounds, SAS throws an error and halts processing rather than returning null / zero.


                                            Updates:




                                            • Removed infile cards; statement (-13)

                                            • Used wildcard a: for array definition rather than a1-a16 (-4)


                                            Golfed:



                                            data;input a1-a16;array a[4,4]a:;p=16;t=136;do while(p);m=whichn(p,of a:);t=t-p;j=mod(m-1,4)+1;i=ceil(m/4);a[i,j]=0;p=0;do k=max(1,i-1)to min(i+1,4);do l=max(1,j-1)to min(j+1,4);p=max(p,a[k,l]);end;end;end;put t;cards;
                                            <insert punch cards here>
                                            ;


                                            Ungolfed:



                                            data;                /*Produce a dataset using automatic naming*/
                                            input a1-a16; /*Read 16 variables*/
                                            array a[4,4] a:; /*Assign to a 4x4 array*/
                                            p=16; /*Initial pile to look for*/
                                            t=136; /*Total cheese to decrement*/
                                            do while(p); /*Stop if there are no piles available with size > 0*/
                                            m=whichn(p,of a:); /*Find array element containing current pile size*/
                                            t=t-p; /*Decrement total cheese*/
                                            j=mod(m-1,4)+1; /*Get column number*/
                                            i=ceil(m/4); /*Get row number*/
                                            a[i,j]=0; /*Eat the current pile*/
                                            /*Find the size of the largest adjacent pile*/
                                            p=0;
                                            do k=max(1,i-1)to min(i+1,4);
                                            do l=max(1,j-1)to min(j+1,4);
                                            p=max(p,a[k,l]);
                                            end;
                                            end;
                                            end;
                                            put t; /*Print total remaining cheese to log*/
                                            /*Start of punch card input*/
                                            cards;
                                            4 3 2 1 5 6 7 8 12 11 10 9 13 14 15 16
                                            8 1 9 14 11 6 5 16 13 15 2 7 10 3 12 4
                                            1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
                                            10 15 14 11 9 3 1 7 13 5 12 6 2 8 4 16
                                            3 7 10 5 6 8 12 13 15 9 11 4 14 1 16 2
                                            8 9 3 6 13 11 7 15 12 10 16 2 4 14 1 5
                                            8 11 12 9 14 5 10 16 7 3 1 6 13 4 2 15
                                            13 14 1 2 16 15 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
                                            9 10 11 12 1 2 4 13 7 8 5 14 3 16 6 15
                                            9 10 11 12 1 2 7 13 6 16 4 14 3 8 5 15
                                            ; /*End of punch card input*/
                                            /*Implicit run;*/





                                            share|improve this answer











                                            $endgroup$



                                            SAS, 236 219 bytes



                                            Input on punch cards, one line per grid (space-separated), output printed to the log.



                                            This challenge is slightly complicated by some limitations of arrays in SAS:




                                            • There is no way to return the row and column indexes of a matching element from multidimensional data-step array - you have to treat the array as 1-d and then work them out for yourself.

                                            • If you go out of bounds, SAS throws an error and halts processing rather than returning null / zero.


                                            Updates:




                                            • Removed infile cards; statement (-13)

                                            • Used wildcard a: for array definition rather than a1-a16 (-4)


                                            Golfed:



                                            data;input a1-a16;array a[4,4]a:;p=16;t=136;do while(p);m=whichn(p,of a:);t=t-p;j=mod(m-1,4)+1;i=ceil(m/4);a[i,j]=0;p=0;do k=max(1,i-1)to min(i+1,4);do l=max(1,j-1)to min(j+1,4);p=max(p,a[k,l]);end;end;end;put t;cards;
                                            <insert punch cards here>
                                            ;


                                            Ungolfed:



                                            data;                /*Produce a dataset using automatic naming*/
                                            input a1-a16; /*Read 16 variables*/
                                            array a[4,4] a:; /*Assign to a 4x4 array*/
                                            p=16; /*Initial pile to look for*/
                                            t=136; /*Total cheese to decrement*/
                                            do while(p); /*Stop if there are no piles available with size > 0*/
                                            m=whichn(p,of a:); /*Find array element containing current pile size*/
                                            t=t-p; /*Decrement total cheese*/
                                            j=mod(m-1,4)+1; /*Get column number*/
                                            i=ceil(m/4); /*Get row number*/
                                            a[i,j]=0; /*Eat the current pile*/
                                            /*Find the size of the largest adjacent pile*/
                                            p=0;
                                            do k=max(1,i-1)to min(i+1,4);
                                            do l=max(1,j-1)to min(j+1,4);
                                            p=max(p,a[k,l]);
                                            end;
                                            end;
                                            end;
                                            put t; /*Print total remaining cheese to log*/
                                            /*Start of punch card input*/
                                            cards;
                                            4 3 2 1 5 6 7 8 12 11 10 9 13 14 15 16
                                            8 1 9 14 11 6 5 16 13 15 2 7 10 3 12 4
                                            1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
                                            10 15 14 11 9 3 1 7 13 5 12 6 2 8 4 16
                                            3 7 10 5 6 8 12 13 15 9 11 4 14 1 16 2
                                            8 9 3 6 13 11 7 15 12 10 16 2 4 14 1 5
                                            8 11 12 9 14 5 10 16 7 3 1 6 13 4 2 15
                                            13 14 1 2 16 15 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
                                            9 10 11 12 1 2 4 13 7 8 5 14 3 16 6 15
                                            9 10 11 12 1 2 7 13 6 16 4 14 3 8 5 15
                                            ; /*End of punch card input*/
                                            /*Implicit run;*/






                                            share|improve this answer














                                            share|improve this answer



                                            share|improve this answer








                                            edited Nov 21 '18 at 10:55

























                                            answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:12









                                            user3490user3490

                                            77945




                                            77945








                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              +1 for use of punch cards in PPCG :)
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – GNiklasch
                                              Nov 20 '18 at 18:25














                                            • 1




                                              $begingroup$
                                              +1 for use of punch cards in PPCG :)
                                              $endgroup$
                                              – GNiklasch
                                              Nov 20 '18 at 18:25








                                            1




                                            1




                                            $begingroup$
                                            +1 for use of punch cards in PPCG :)
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – GNiklasch
                                            Nov 20 '18 at 18:25




                                            $begingroup$
                                            +1 for use of punch cards in PPCG :)
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – GNiklasch
                                            Nov 20 '18 at 18:25











                                            3












                                            $begingroup$


                                            Haskell, 163 bytes





                                            o f=foldl1 f.concat
                                            r=[0..3]
                                            q n=take(min(n+2)3).drop(n-1)
                                            0#m=m
                                            v#m=[o max$q y$q x<$>n|y<-r,x<-r,m!!y!!x==v]!!0#n where n=map(z<$>)m;z w|w==v=0|0<1=w
                                            f=o(+).(16#)


                                            Try it online!



                                            The f function takes the input as a list of 4 lists of 4 integers.



                                            Slightly ungolfed



                                            -- helper to fold over the matrix
                                            o f = foldl1 f . concat

                                            -- range of indices
                                            r = [0 .. 3]

                                            -- slice a list (take the neighborhood of a given coordinate)
                                            -- first we drop everything before the neighborhood and then take the neighborhood itself
                                            q n = take (min (n + 2) 3) . drop (n - 1)

                                            -- a step function
                                            0 # m = m -- if the max value of the previous step is zero, return the map
                                            v # m =
                                            -- abuse list comprehension to find the current value in the map
                                            -- convert the found value to its neighborhood,
                                            -- then calculate the max cell value in it
                                            -- and finally take the head of the resulting list
                                            [ o max (q y (q x<$>n)) | y <- r, x <- r, m!!y!!x == v] !! 0
                                            # n -- recurse with our new current value and new map
                                            where
                                            -- a new map with the zero put in place of the value the mouse currently sits on
                                            n = map (zero <$>) m
                                            -- this function returns zero if its argument is equal to v
                                            -- and original argument value otherwise
                                            zero w
                                            | w == v = 0
                                            | otherwise = w

                                            -- THE function. first apply the step function to incoming map,
                                            -- then compute sum of its cells
                                            f = o (+) . (16 #)





                                            share|improve this answer









                                            $endgroup$


















                                              3












                                              $begingroup$


                                              Haskell, 163 bytes





                                              o f=foldl1 f.concat
                                              r=[0..3]
                                              q n=take(min(n+2)3).drop(n-1)
                                              0#m=m
                                              v#m=[o max$q y$q x<$>n|y<-r,x<-r,m!!y!!x==v]!!0#n where n=map(z<$>)m;z w|w==v=0|0<1=w
                                              f=o(+).(16#)


                                              Try it online!



                                              The f function takes the input as a list of 4 lists of 4 integers.



                                              Slightly ungolfed



                                              -- helper to fold over the matrix
                                              o f = foldl1 f . concat

                                              -- range of indices
                                              r = [0 .. 3]

                                              -- slice a list (take the neighborhood of a given coordinate)
                                              -- first we drop everything before the neighborhood and then take the neighborhood itself
                                              q n = take (min (n + 2) 3) . drop (n - 1)

                                              -- a step function
                                              0 # m = m -- if the max value of the previous step is zero, return the map
                                              v # m =
                                              -- abuse list comprehension to find the current value in the map
                                              -- convert the found value to its neighborhood,
                                              -- then calculate the max cell value in it
                                              -- and finally take the head of the resulting list
                                              [ o max (q y (q x<$>n)) | y <- r, x <- r, m!!y!!x == v] !! 0
                                              # n -- recurse with our new current value and new map
                                              where
                                              -- a new map with the zero put in place of the value the mouse currently sits on
                                              n = map (zero <$>) m
                                              -- this function returns zero if its argument is equal to v
                                              -- and original argument value otherwise
                                              zero w
                                              | w == v = 0
                                              | otherwise = w

                                              -- THE function. first apply the step function to incoming map,
                                              -- then compute sum of its cells
                                              f = o (+) . (16 #)





                                              share|improve this answer









                                              $endgroup$
















                                                3












                                                3








                                                3





                                                $begingroup$


                                                Haskell, 163 bytes





                                                o f=foldl1 f.concat
                                                r=[0..3]
                                                q n=take(min(n+2)3).drop(n-1)
                                                0#m=m
                                                v#m=[o max$q y$q x<$>n|y<-r,x<-r,m!!y!!x==v]!!0#n where n=map(z<$>)m;z w|w==v=0|0<1=w
                                                f=o(+).(16#)


                                                Try it online!



                                                The f function takes the input as a list of 4 lists of 4 integers.



                                                Slightly ungolfed



                                                -- helper to fold over the matrix
                                                o f = foldl1 f . concat

                                                -- range of indices
                                                r = [0 .. 3]

                                                -- slice a list (take the neighborhood of a given coordinate)
                                                -- first we drop everything before the neighborhood and then take the neighborhood itself
                                                q n = take (min (n + 2) 3) . drop (n - 1)

                                                -- a step function
                                                0 # m = m -- if the max value of the previous step is zero, return the map
                                                v # m =
                                                -- abuse list comprehension to find the current value in the map
                                                -- convert the found value to its neighborhood,
                                                -- then calculate the max cell value in it
                                                -- and finally take the head of the resulting list
                                                [ o max (q y (q x<$>n)) | y <- r, x <- r, m!!y!!x == v] !! 0
                                                # n -- recurse with our new current value and new map
                                                where
                                                -- a new map with the zero put in place of the value the mouse currently sits on
                                                n = map (zero <$>) m
                                                -- this function returns zero if its argument is equal to v
                                                -- and original argument value otherwise
                                                zero w
                                                | w == v = 0
                                                | otherwise = w

                                                -- THE function. first apply the step function to incoming map,
                                                -- then compute sum of its cells
                                                f = o (+) . (16 #)





                                                share|improve this answer









                                                $endgroup$




                                                Haskell, 163 bytes





                                                o f=foldl1 f.concat
                                                r=[0..3]
                                                q n=take(min(n+2)3).drop(n-1)
                                                0#m=m
                                                v#m=[o max$q y$q x<$>n|y<-r,x<-r,m!!y!!x==v]!!0#n where n=map(z<$>)m;z w|w==v=0|0<1=w
                                                f=o(+).(16#)


                                                Try it online!



                                                The f function takes the input as a list of 4 lists of 4 integers.



                                                Slightly ungolfed



                                                -- helper to fold over the matrix
                                                o f = foldl1 f . concat

                                                -- range of indices
                                                r = [0 .. 3]

                                                -- slice a list (take the neighborhood of a given coordinate)
                                                -- first we drop everything before the neighborhood and then take the neighborhood itself
                                                q n = take (min (n + 2) 3) . drop (n - 1)

                                                -- a step function
                                                0 # m = m -- if the max value of the previous step is zero, return the map
                                                v # m =
                                                -- abuse list comprehension to find the current value in the map
                                                -- convert the found value to its neighborhood,
                                                -- then calculate the max cell value in it
                                                -- and finally take the head of the resulting list
                                                [ o max (q y (q x<$>n)) | y <- r, x <- r, m!!y!!x == v] !! 0
                                                # n -- recurse with our new current value and new map
                                                where
                                                -- a new map with the zero put in place of the value the mouse currently sits on
                                                n = map (zero <$>) m
                                                -- this function returns zero if its argument is equal to v
                                                -- and original argument value otherwise
                                                zero w
                                                | w == v = 0
                                                | otherwise = w

                                                -- THE function. first apply the step function to incoming map,
                                                -- then compute sum of its cells
                                                f = o (+) . (16 #)






                                                share|improve this answer












                                                share|improve this answer



                                                share|improve this answer










                                                answered Nov 23 '18 at 6:00









                                                Max YekhlakovMax Yekhlakov

                                                4617




                                                4617























                                                    3












                                                    $begingroup$

                                                    Java 10, 272 bytes





                                                    m->{int r=0,c=0,R=4,C,M=1,x,y,X=0,Y=0;for(;R-->0;)for(C=4;C-->0;)if(m[R][C]>15)m[r=R][c=C]=0;for(;M!=0;m[r=X][c=Y]=0)for(M=-1,C=9;C-->0;)try{if((R=m[x=C<3?r-1:C>5?r+1:r][y=C%3<1?c-1:C%3>1?c+1:c])>M){M=R;X=x;Y=y;}}catch(Exception e){}for(var Z:m)for(int z:Z)M+=z;return M;}


                                                    The cells are checked the same as in my answer for the All the single eights challenge.



                                                    Try it online.



                                                    Explanation:



                                                    m->{                       // Method with integer-matrix parameter and integer return-type
                                                    int r=0, // Row-coordinate for the largest number, starting at 0
                                                    c=0, // Column-coordinate for the largest number, starting at 0
                                                    R=4,C, // Row and column indices (later reused as temp integers)
                                                    M=1, // Largest number the mouse just ate, starting at 1
                                                    x,y,X=0,Y=0; // Temp integers
                                                    for(;R-->0;) // Loop `R` in the range (4, 0]:
                                                    for(C=4;C-->0;) // Inner loop `C` in the range (4, 0]:
                                                    if(m[R][C]>15) // If the current cell is 16:
                                                    m[r=R][c=C] // Set `r,c` to this coordinate
                                                    =0; // And empty this cell
                                                    for(;M!=0; // Loop as long as the largest number isn't 0:
                                                    ; // After every iteration:
                                                    m[r=X][c=Y] // Change the `r,c` coordinates,
                                                    =0) // And empty this cell
                                                    for(M=-1, // Reset `M` to -1
                                                    C=9;C-->0;) // Inner loop `C` in the range (9, 0]:
                                                    try{if((R= // Set `R` to:
                                                    m[x=C<3? // If `C` is 0, 1, or 2:
                                                    r-1 // Look at the previous row
                                                    :C>5? // Else-if `C` is 6, 7, or 8:
                                                    r+1 // Look at the next row
                                                    : // Else (`C` is 3, 4, or 5):
                                                    r] // Look at the current row
                                                    [y=C%3<1? // If `C` is 0, 3, or 6:
                                                    c-1 // Look at the previous column
                                                    :C%3>1? // Else-if `C` is 2, 5, or 8:
                                                    c+1 // Look at the next column
                                                    : // Else (`C` is 1, 4, or 7):
                                                    c]) // Look at the current column
                                                    >M){ // And if the number in this cell is larger than `M`
                                                    M=R; // Change `M` to this number
                                                    X=x;Y=y;} // And change the `X,Y` coordinate to this cell
                                                    }catch(Exception e){}
                                                    // Catch and ignore ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExceptions
                                                    // (try-catch saves bytes in comparison to if-checks)
                                                    for(var Z:m) // Then loop over all rows of the matrix:
                                                    for(int z:Z) // Inner loop over all columns of the matrix:
                                                    M+=z; // And sum them all together in `M` (which was 0)
                                                    return M;} // Then return this sum as result





                                                    share|improve this answer











                                                    $endgroup$













                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      could you not to int r=c=X=Y=0,R=4,M=1,x,y; ?
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Serverfrog
                                                      Nov 22 '18 at 12:53










                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      @Serverfrog I'm afraid that's not possible when declaring the variables in Java. Your suggestion did give me an idea to save a byte though, by using int r,c,R=4,M=1,x,y,X,Y;for(r=c=X=Y=0;, so thanks. :)
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                                                      Nov 22 '18 at 15:48


















                                                    3












                                                    $begingroup$

                                                    Java 10, 272 bytes





                                                    m->{int r=0,c=0,R=4,C,M=1,x,y,X=0,Y=0;for(;R-->0;)for(C=4;C-->0;)if(m[R][C]>15)m[r=R][c=C]=0;for(;M!=0;m[r=X][c=Y]=0)for(M=-1,C=9;C-->0;)try{if((R=m[x=C<3?r-1:C>5?r+1:r][y=C%3<1?c-1:C%3>1?c+1:c])>M){M=R;X=x;Y=y;}}catch(Exception e){}for(var Z:m)for(int z:Z)M+=z;return M;}


                                                    The cells are checked the same as in my answer for the All the single eights challenge.



                                                    Try it online.



                                                    Explanation:



                                                    m->{                       // Method with integer-matrix parameter and integer return-type
                                                    int r=0, // Row-coordinate for the largest number, starting at 0
                                                    c=0, // Column-coordinate for the largest number, starting at 0
                                                    R=4,C, // Row and column indices (later reused as temp integers)
                                                    M=1, // Largest number the mouse just ate, starting at 1
                                                    x,y,X=0,Y=0; // Temp integers
                                                    for(;R-->0;) // Loop `R` in the range (4, 0]:
                                                    for(C=4;C-->0;) // Inner loop `C` in the range (4, 0]:
                                                    if(m[R][C]>15) // If the current cell is 16:
                                                    m[r=R][c=C] // Set `r,c` to this coordinate
                                                    =0; // And empty this cell
                                                    for(;M!=0; // Loop as long as the largest number isn't 0:
                                                    ; // After every iteration:
                                                    m[r=X][c=Y] // Change the `r,c` coordinates,
                                                    =0) // And empty this cell
                                                    for(M=-1, // Reset `M` to -1
                                                    C=9;C-->0;) // Inner loop `C` in the range (9, 0]:
                                                    try{if((R= // Set `R` to:
                                                    m[x=C<3? // If `C` is 0, 1, or 2:
                                                    r-1 // Look at the previous row
                                                    :C>5? // Else-if `C` is 6, 7, or 8:
                                                    r+1 // Look at the next row
                                                    : // Else (`C` is 3, 4, or 5):
                                                    r] // Look at the current row
                                                    [y=C%3<1? // If `C` is 0, 3, or 6:
                                                    c-1 // Look at the previous column
                                                    :C%3>1? // Else-if `C` is 2, 5, or 8:
                                                    c+1 // Look at the next column
                                                    : // Else (`C` is 1, 4, or 7):
                                                    c]) // Look at the current column
                                                    >M){ // And if the number in this cell is larger than `M`
                                                    M=R; // Change `M` to this number
                                                    X=x;Y=y;} // And change the `X,Y` coordinate to this cell
                                                    }catch(Exception e){}
                                                    // Catch and ignore ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExceptions
                                                    // (try-catch saves bytes in comparison to if-checks)
                                                    for(var Z:m) // Then loop over all rows of the matrix:
                                                    for(int z:Z) // Inner loop over all columns of the matrix:
                                                    M+=z; // And sum them all together in `M` (which was 0)
                                                    return M;} // Then return this sum as result





                                                    share|improve this answer











                                                    $endgroup$













                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      could you not to int r=c=X=Y=0,R=4,M=1,x,y; ?
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Serverfrog
                                                      Nov 22 '18 at 12:53










                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      @Serverfrog I'm afraid that's not possible when declaring the variables in Java. Your suggestion did give me an idea to save a byte though, by using int r,c,R=4,M=1,x,y,X,Y;for(r=c=X=Y=0;, so thanks. :)
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                                                      Nov 22 '18 at 15:48
















                                                    3












                                                    3








                                                    3





                                                    $begingroup$

                                                    Java 10, 272 bytes





                                                    m->{int r=0,c=0,R=4,C,M=1,x,y,X=0,Y=0;for(;R-->0;)for(C=4;C-->0;)if(m[R][C]>15)m[r=R][c=C]=0;for(;M!=0;m[r=X][c=Y]=0)for(M=-1,C=9;C-->0;)try{if((R=m[x=C<3?r-1:C>5?r+1:r][y=C%3<1?c-1:C%3>1?c+1:c])>M){M=R;X=x;Y=y;}}catch(Exception e){}for(var Z:m)for(int z:Z)M+=z;return M;}


                                                    The cells are checked the same as in my answer for the All the single eights challenge.



                                                    Try it online.



                                                    Explanation:



                                                    m->{                       // Method with integer-matrix parameter and integer return-type
                                                    int r=0, // Row-coordinate for the largest number, starting at 0
                                                    c=0, // Column-coordinate for the largest number, starting at 0
                                                    R=4,C, // Row and column indices (later reused as temp integers)
                                                    M=1, // Largest number the mouse just ate, starting at 1
                                                    x,y,X=0,Y=0; // Temp integers
                                                    for(;R-->0;) // Loop `R` in the range (4, 0]:
                                                    for(C=4;C-->0;) // Inner loop `C` in the range (4, 0]:
                                                    if(m[R][C]>15) // If the current cell is 16:
                                                    m[r=R][c=C] // Set `r,c` to this coordinate
                                                    =0; // And empty this cell
                                                    for(;M!=0; // Loop as long as the largest number isn't 0:
                                                    ; // After every iteration:
                                                    m[r=X][c=Y] // Change the `r,c` coordinates,
                                                    =0) // And empty this cell
                                                    for(M=-1, // Reset `M` to -1
                                                    C=9;C-->0;) // Inner loop `C` in the range (9, 0]:
                                                    try{if((R= // Set `R` to:
                                                    m[x=C<3? // If `C` is 0, 1, or 2:
                                                    r-1 // Look at the previous row
                                                    :C>5? // Else-if `C` is 6, 7, or 8:
                                                    r+1 // Look at the next row
                                                    : // Else (`C` is 3, 4, or 5):
                                                    r] // Look at the current row
                                                    [y=C%3<1? // If `C` is 0, 3, or 6:
                                                    c-1 // Look at the previous column
                                                    :C%3>1? // Else-if `C` is 2, 5, or 8:
                                                    c+1 // Look at the next column
                                                    : // Else (`C` is 1, 4, or 7):
                                                    c]) // Look at the current column
                                                    >M){ // And if the number in this cell is larger than `M`
                                                    M=R; // Change `M` to this number
                                                    X=x;Y=y;} // And change the `X,Y` coordinate to this cell
                                                    }catch(Exception e){}
                                                    // Catch and ignore ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExceptions
                                                    // (try-catch saves bytes in comparison to if-checks)
                                                    for(var Z:m) // Then loop over all rows of the matrix:
                                                    for(int z:Z) // Inner loop over all columns of the matrix:
                                                    M+=z; // And sum them all together in `M` (which was 0)
                                                    return M;} // Then return this sum as result





                                                    share|improve this answer











                                                    $endgroup$



                                                    Java 10, 272 bytes





                                                    m->{int r=0,c=0,R=4,C,M=1,x,y,X=0,Y=0;for(;R-->0;)for(C=4;C-->0;)if(m[R][C]>15)m[r=R][c=C]=0;for(;M!=0;m[r=X][c=Y]=0)for(M=-1,C=9;C-->0;)try{if((R=m[x=C<3?r-1:C>5?r+1:r][y=C%3<1?c-1:C%3>1?c+1:c])>M){M=R;X=x;Y=y;}}catch(Exception e){}for(var Z:m)for(int z:Z)M+=z;return M;}


                                                    The cells are checked the same as in my answer for the All the single eights challenge.



                                                    Try it online.



                                                    Explanation:



                                                    m->{                       // Method with integer-matrix parameter and integer return-type
                                                    int r=0, // Row-coordinate for the largest number, starting at 0
                                                    c=0, // Column-coordinate for the largest number, starting at 0
                                                    R=4,C, // Row and column indices (later reused as temp integers)
                                                    M=1, // Largest number the mouse just ate, starting at 1
                                                    x,y,X=0,Y=0; // Temp integers
                                                    for(;R-->0;) // Loop `R` in the range (4, 0]:
                                                    for(C=4;C-->0;) // Inner loop `C` in the range (4, 0]:
                                                    if(m[R][C]>15) // If the current cell is 16:
                                                    m[r=R][c=C] // Set `r,c` to this coordinate
                                                    =0; // And empty this cell
                                                    for(;M!=0; // Loop as long as the largest number isn't 0:
                                                    ; // After every iteration:
                                                    m[r=X][c=Y] // Change the `r,c` coordinates,
                                                    =0) // And empty this cell
                                                    for(M=-1, // Reset `M` to -1
                                                    C=9;C-->0;) // Inner loop `C` in the range (9, 0]:
                                                    try{if((R= // Set `R` to:
                                                    m[x=C<3? // If `C` is 0, 1, or 2:
                                                    r-1 // Look at the previous row
                                                    :C>5? // Else-if `C` is 6, 7, or 8:
                                                    r+1 // Look at the next row
                                                    : // Else (`C` is 3, 4, or 5):
                                                    r] // Look at the current row
                                                    [y=C%3<1? // If `C` is 0, 3, or 6:
                                                    c-1 // Look at the previous column
                                                    :C%3>1? // Else-if `C` is 2, 5, or 8:
                                                    c+1 // Look at the next column
                                                    : // Else (`C` is 1, 4, or 7):
                                                    c]) // Look at the current column
                                                    >M){ // And if the number in this cell is larger than `M`
                                                    M=R; // Change `M` to this number
                                                    X=x;Y=y;} // And change the `X,Y` coordinate to this cell
                                                    }catch(Exception e){}
                                                    // Catch and ignore ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExceptions
                                                    // (try-catch saves bytes in comparison to if-checks)
                                                    for(var Z:m) // Then loop over all rows of the matrix:
                                                    for(int z:Z) // Inner loop over all columns of the matrix:
                                                    M+=z; // And sum them all together in `M` (which was 0)
                                                    return M;} // Then return this sum as result






                                                    share|improve this answer














                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                    edited Jan 17 at 9:50

























                                                    answered Nov 20 '18 at 8:27









                                                    Kevin CruijssenKevin Cruijssen

                                                    38.1k557195




                                                    38.1k557195












                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      could you not to int r=c=X=Y=0,R=4,M=1,x,y; ?
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Serverfrog
                                                      Nov 22 '18 at 12:53










                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      @Serverfrog I'm afraid that's not possible when declaring the variables in Java. Your suggestion did give me an idea to save a byte though, by using int r,c,R=4,M=1,x,y,X,Y;for(r=c=X=Y=0;, so thanks. :)
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                                                      Nov 22 '18 at 15:48




















                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      could you not to int r=c=X=Y=0,R=4,M=1,x,y; ?
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Serverfrog
                                                      Nov 22 '18 at 12:53










                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      @Serverfrog I'm afraid that's not possible when declaring the variables in Java. Your suggestion did give me an idea to save a byte though, by using int r,c,R=4,M=1,x,y,X,Y;for(r=c=X=Y=0;, so thanks. :)
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Kevin Cruijssen
                                                      Nov 22 '18 at 15:48


















                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    could you not to int r=c=X=Y=0,R=4,M=1,x,y; ?
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Serverfrog
                                                    Nov 22 '18 at 12:53




                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    could you not to int r=c=X=Y=0,R=4,M=1,x,y; ?
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Serverfrog
                                                    Nov 22 '18 at 12:53












                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    @Serverfrog I'm afraid that's not possible when declaring the variables in Java. Your suggestion did give me an idea to save a byte though, by using int r,c,R=4,M=1,x,y,X,Y;for(r=c=X=Y=0;, so thanks. :)
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Kevin Cruijssen
                                                    Nov 22 '18 at 15:48






                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    @Serverfrog I'm afraid that's not possible when declaring the variables in Java. Your suggestion did give me an idea to save a byte though, by using int r,c,R=4,M=1,x,y,X,Y;for(r=c=X=Y=0;, so thanks. :)
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Kevin Cruijssen
                                                    Nov 22 '18 at 15:48













                                                    2












                                                    $begingroup$


                                                    Jelly,  31 30  29 bytes



                                                    ³œiⱮZIỊȦ
                                                    ⁴ṖŒPŒ!€Ẏ⁴;ⱮṢÇƇṪ
                                                    FḟÇS


                                                    Since the method is far too slow to run within 60s with the mouse starting on 16 this starts her off at 9 and limits her ability such that she is only able to eat 9s or less Try it online! (thus here she eats 9, 2, 7, 4, 8, 6, 3 leaving 97).



                                                    How?



                                                    ³œiⱮZIỊȦ - Link 1, isSatisfactory?: list of integers, possiblePileChoice
                                                    ³ - (using a left argument of) program's 3rd command line argument (M)
                                                    Ɱ - map across (possiblePileChoice) with:
                                                    œi - first multi-dimensional index of (the item) in (M)
                                                    Z - transpose the resulting list of [row, column] values
                                                    I - get the incremental differences
                                                    Ị - insignificant? (vectorises an abs(v) <= 1 test)
                                                    Ȧ - any and all? (0 if any 0s are present in the flattened result [or if it's empty])

                                                    ⁴ṖŒPŒ!€Ẏ⁴;ⱮṢÇƇṪ - Link 2, getChosenPileList: list of lists of integers, M
                                                    ⁴ - literal 16
                                                    Ṗ - pop -> [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]
                                                    ŒP - power-set -> [,[1],[2],...,[1,2],[1,3],...,[2,3,7],...,[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]]
                                                    € - for each:
                                                    Œ! - all permutations
                                                    Ẏ - tighten (to a single list of all these individual permutations)
                                                    ⁴ - (using a left argument of) literal 16
                                                    Ɱ - map across it with:
                                                    ; - concatenate (put a 16 at the beginning of each one)
                                                    Ṣ - sort the resulting list of lists
                                                    Ƈ - filter keep those for which this is truthy:
                                                    Ç - call last Link as a monad (i.e. isSatisfactory(possiblePileChoice)
                                                    Ṫ - tail (get the right-most, i.e. the maximal satisfactory one)

                                                    FḟÇS - Main Link: list of lists of integers, M
                                                    F - flatten M
                                                    Ç - call last Link (2) as a monad (i.e. get getChosenPileList(M))
                                                    ḟ - filter discard (the resulting values) from (the flattened M)
                                                    S - sum





                                                    share|improve this answer











                                                    $endgroup$













                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      Ah yeah, power-set is not enough!
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Jonathan Allan
                                                      Nov 20 '18 at 0:34






                                                    • 2




                                                      $begingroup$
                                                      @Arnauld - finally got a little time to golf :D This should work, but will be (way) too slow for running at TIO with the test case you used before.
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Jonathan Allan
                                                      Nov 20 '18 at 17:02
















                                                    2












                                                    $begingroup$


                                                    Jelly,  31 30  29 bytes



                                                    ³œiⱮZIỊȦ
                                                    ⁴ṖŒPŒ!€Ẏ⁴;ⱮṢÇƇṪ
                                                    FḟÇS


                                                    Since the method is far too slow to run within 60s with the mouse starting on 16 this starts her off at 9 and limits her ability such that she is only able to eat 9s or less Try it online! (thus here she eats 9, 2, 7, 4, 8, 6, 3 leaving 97).



                                                    How?



                                                    ³œiⱮZIỊȦ - Link 1, isSatisfactory?: list of integers, possiblePileChoice
                                                    ³ - (using a left argument of) program's 3rd command line argument (M)
                                                    Ɱ - map across (possiblePileChoice) with:
                                                    œi - first multi-dimensional index of (the item) in (M)
                                                    Z - transpose the resulting list of [row, column] values
                                                    I - get the incremental differences
                                                    Ị - insignificant? (vectorises an abs(v) <= 1 test)
                                                    Ȧ - any and all? (0 if any 0s are present in the flattened result [or if it's empty])

                                                    ⁴ṖŒPŒ!€Ẏ⁴;ⱮṢÇƇṪ - Link 2, getChosenPileList: list of lists of integers, M
                                                    ⁴ - literal 16
                                                    Ṗ - pop -> [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]
                                                    ŒP - power-set -> [,[1],[2],...,[1,2],[1,3],...,[2,3,7],...,[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]]
                                                    € - for each:
                                                    Œ! - all permutations
                                                    Ẏ - tighten (to a single list of all these individual permutations)
                                                    ⁴ - (using a left argument of) literal 16
                                                    Ɱ - map across it with:
                                                    ; - concatenate (put a 16 at the beginning of each one)
                                                    Ṣ - sort the resulting list of lists
                                                    Ƈ - filter keep those for which this is truthy:
                                                    Ç - call last Link as a monad (i.e. isSatisfactory(possiblePileChoice)
                                                    Ṫ - tail (get the right-most, i.e. the maximal satisfactory one)

                                                    FḟÇS - Main Link: list of lists of integers, M
                                                    F - flatten M
                                                    Ç - call last Link (2) as a monad (i.e. get getChosenPileList(M))
                                                    ḟ - filter discard (the resulting values) from (the flattened M)
                                                    S - sum





                                                    share|improve this answer











                                                    $endgroup$













                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      Ah yeah, power-set is not enough!
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Jonathan Allan
                                                      Nov 20 '18 at 0:34






                                                    • 2




                                                      $begingroup$
                                                      @Arnauld - finally got a little time to golf :D This should work, but will be (way) too slow for running at TIO with the test case you used before.
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Jonathan Allan
                                                      Nov 20 '18 at 17:02














                                                    2












                                                    2








                                                    2





                                                    $begingroup$


                                                    Jelly,  31 30  29 bytes



                                                    ³œiⱮZIỊȦ
                                                    ⁴ṖŒPŒ!€Ẏ⁴;ⱮṢÇƇṪ
                                                    FḟÇS


                                                    Since the method is far too slow to run within 60s with the mouse starting on 16 this starts her off at 9 and limits her ability such that she is only able to eat 9s or less Try it online! (thus here she eats 9, 2, 7, 4, 8, 6, 3 leaving 97).



                                                    How?



                                                    ³œiⱮZIỊȦ - Link 1, isSatisfactory?: list of integers, possiblePileChoice
                                                    ³ - (using a left argument of) program's 3rd command line argument (M)
                                                    Ɱ - map across (possiblePileChoice) with:
                                                    œi - first multi-dimensional index of (the item) in (M)
                                                    Z - transpose the resulting list of [row, column] values
                                                    I - get the incremental differences
                                                    Ị - insignificant? (vectorises an abs(v) <= 1 test)
                                                    Ȧ - any and all? (0 if any 0s are present in the flattened result [or if it's empty])

                                                    ⁴ṖŒPŒ!€Ẏ⁴;ⱮṢÇƇṪ - Link 2, getChosenPileList: list of lists of integers, M
                                                    ⁴ - literal 16
                                                    Ṗ - pop -> [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]
                                                    ŒP - power-set -> [,[1],[2],...,[1,2],[1,3],...,[2,3,7],...,[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]]
                                                    € - for each:
                                                    Œ! - all permutations
                                                    Ẏ - tighten (to a single list of all these individual permutations)
                                                    ⁴ - (using a left argument of) literal 16
                                                    Ɱ - map across it with:
                                                    ; - concatenate (put a 16 at the beginning of each one)
                                                    Ṣ - sort the resulting list of lists
                                                    Ƈ - filter keep those for which this is truthy:
                                                    Ç - call last Link as a monad (i.e. isSatisfactory(possiblePileChoice)
                                                    Ṫ - tail (get the right-most, i.e. the maximal satisfactory one)

                                                    FḟÇS - Main Link: list of lists of integers, M
                                                    F - flatten M
                                                    Ç - call last Link (2) as a monad (i.e. get getChosenPileList(M))
                                                    ḟ - filter discard (the resulting values) from (the flattened M)
                                                    S - sum





                                                    share|improve this answer











                                                    $endgroup$




                                                    Jelly,  31 30  29 bytes



                                                    ³œiⱮZIỊȦ
                                                    ⁴ṖŒPŒ!€Ẏ⁴;ⱮṢÇƇṪ
                                                    FḟÇS


                                                    Since the method is far too slow to run within 60s with the mouse starting on 16 this starts her off at 9 and limits her ability such that she is only able to eat 9s or less Try it online! (thus here she eats 9, 2, 7, 4, 8, 6, 3 leaving 97).



                                                    How?



                                                    ³œiⱮZIỊȦ - Link 1, isSatisfactory?: list of integers, possiblePileChoice
                                                    ³ - (using a left argument of) program's 3rd command line argument (M)
                                                    Ɱ - map across (possiblePileChoice) with:
                                                    œi - first multi-dimensional index of (the item) in (M)
                                                    Z - transpose the resulting list of [row, column] values
                                                    I - get the incremental differences
                                                    Ị - insignificant? (vectorises an abs(v) <= 1 test)
                                                    Ȧ - any and all? (0 if any 0s are present in the flattened result [or if it's empty])

                                                    ⁴ṖŒPŒ!€Ẏ⁴;ⱮṢÇƇṪ - Link 2, getChosenPileList: list of lists of integers, M
                                                    ⁴ - literal 16
                                                    Ṗ - pop -> [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]
                                                    ŒP - power-set -> [,[1],[2],...,[1,2],[1,3],...,[2,3,7],...,[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]]
                                                    € - for each:
                                                    Œ! - all permutations
                                                    Ẏ - tighten (to a single list of all these individual permutations)
                                                    ⁴ - (using a left argument of) literal 16
                                                    Ɱ - map across it with:
                                                    ; - concatenate (put a 16 at the beginning of each one)
                                                    Ṣ - sort the resulting list of lists
                                                    Ƈ - filter keep those for which this is truthy:
                                                    Ç - call last Link as a monad (i.e. isSatisfactory(possiblePileChoice)
                                                    Ṫ - tail (get the right-most, i.e. the maximal satisfactory one)

                                                    FḟÇS - Main Link: list of lists of integers, M
                                                    F - flatten M
                                                    Ç - call last Link (2) as a monad (i.e. get getChosenPileList(M))
                                                    ḟ - filter discard (the resulting values) from (the flattened M)
                                                    S - sum






                                                    share|improve this answer














                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                    edited Nov 20 '18 at 18:15

























                                                    answered Nov 20 '18 at 0:28









                                                    Jonathan AllanJonathan Allan

                                                    52.1k535170




                                                    52.1k535170












                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      Ah yeah, power-set is not enough!
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Jonathan Allan
                                                      Nov 20 '18 at 0:34






                                                    • 2




                                                      $begingroup$
                                                      @Arnauld - finally got a little time to golf :D This should work, but will be (way) too slow for running at TIO with the test case you used before.
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Jonathan Allan
                                                      Nov 20 '18 at 17:02


















                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                      Ah yeah, power-set is not enough!
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Jonathan Allan
                                                      Nov 20 '18 at 0:34






                                                    • 2




                                                      $begingroup$
                                                      @Arnauld - finally got a little time to golf :D This should work, but will be (way) too slow for running at TIO with the test case you used before.
                                                      $endgroup$
                                                      – Jonathan Allan
                                                      Nov 20 '18 at 17:02
















                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    Ah yeah, power-set is not enough!
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Jonathan Allan
                                                    Nov 20 '18 at 0:34




                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    Ah yeah, power-set is not enough!
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Jonathan Allan
                                                    Nov 20 '18 at 0:34




                                                    2




                                                    2




                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    @Arnauld - finally got a little time to golf :D This should work, but will be (way) too slow for running at TIO with the test case you used before.
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Jonathan Allan
                                                    Nov 20 '18 at 17:02




                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    @Arnauld - finally got a little time to golf :D This should work, but will be (way) too slow for running at TIO with the test case you used before.
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Jonathan Allan
                                                    Nov 20 '18 at 17:02











                                                    2












                                                    $begingroup$

                                                    Powershell, 143 141 136 130 122 121 bytes





                                                    $a=,0*5+($args|%{$_+0})
                                                    for($n=16;$i=$a.IndexOf($n)){$a[$i]=0
                                                    $n=(-1,1+-6..-4+4..6|%{$a[$i+$_]}|sort)[-1]}$a|%{$s+=$_}
                                                    $s


                                                    Less golfed test script:



                                                    $f = {

                                                    $a=,0*5+($args|%{$_+0})
                                                    for($n=16;$i=$a.IndexOf($n)){
                                                    $a[$i]=0
                                                    $n=(-1,1+-6..-4+4..6|%{$a[$i+$_]}|sort)[-1]
                                                    }
                                                    $a|%{$s+=$_}
                                                    $s

                                                    }

                                                    @(
                                                    ,( 0 , ( 4, 3, 2, 1), ( 5, 6, 7, 8), (12, 11, 10, 9), (13, 14, 15, 16) )
                                                    ,( 0 , ( 8, 1, 9, 14), (11, 6, 5, 16), (13, 15, 2, 7), (10, 3, 12, 4) )
                                                    ,( 1 , ( 1, 2, 3, 4), ( 5, 6, 7, 8), ( 9, 10, 11, 12), (13, 14, 15, 16) )
                                                    ,( 3 , (10, 15, 14, 11), ( 9, 3, 1, 7), (13, 5, 12, 6), ( 2, 8, 4, 16) )
                                                    ,( 12 , ( 3, 7, 10, 5), ( 6, 8, 12, 13), (15, 9, 11, 4), (14, 1, 16, 2) )
                                                    ,( 34 , ( 8, 9, 3, 6), (13, 11, 7, 15), (12, 10, 16, 2), ( 4, 14, 1, 5) )
                                                    ,( 51 , ( 8, 11, 12, 9), (14, 5, 10, 16), ( 7, 3, 1, 6), (13, 4, 2, 15) )
                                                    ,( 78 , (13, 14, 1, 2), (16, 15, 3, 4), ( 5, 6, 7, 8), ( 9, 10, 11, 12) )
                                                    ,( 102, ( 9, 10, 11, 12), ( 1, 2, 4, 13), ( 7, 8, 5, 14), ( 3, 16, 6, 15) )
                                                    ,( 103, ( 9, 10, 11, 12), ( 1, 2, 7, 13), ( 6, 16, 4, 14), ( 3, 8, 5, 15) )
                                                    ) | % {
                                                    $expected, $a = $_
                                                    $result = &$f @a
                                                    "$($result-eq$expected): $result"
                                                    }


                                                    Output:



                                                    True: 0
                                                    True: 0
                                                    True: 1
                                                    True: 3
                                                    True: 12
                                                    True: 34
                                                    True: 51
                                                    True: 78
                                                    True: 102
                                                    True: 103


                                                    Explanation:



                                                    First, add top and bottom borders of 0 and make a single dimensional array:





                                                    0 0 0 0 0
                                                    # # # # 0
                                                    # # # # 0
                                                    # # # # 0
                                                    # # # # 0



                                                    0 0 0 0 0 # # # # 0 # # # # 0 # # # # 0 # # # # 0


                                                    Powershell returns $null if you try to get the value behind the end of the array.



                                                    Second, loop biggest neighbor pile started from 16 to non-zero-maximum. And nullify it (The Hungry Mouse eats it).





                                                    for($n=16;$i=$a.IndexOf($n)){
                                                    $a[$i]=0
                                                    $n=(-1,1+-6..-4+4..6|%{$a[$i+$_]}|sort)[-1]
                                                    }


                                                    Third, sum of the remaining piles.






                                                    share|improve this answer











                                                    $endgroup$


















                                                      2












                                                      $begingroup$

                                                      Powershell, 143 141 136 130 122 121 bytes





                                                      $a=,0*5+($args|%{$_+0})
                                                      for($n=16;$i=$a.IndexOf($n)){$a[$i]=0
                                                      $n=(-1,1+-6..-4+4..6|%{$a[$i+$_]}|sort)[-1]}$a|%{$s+=$_}
                                                      $s


                                                      Less golfed test script:



                                                      $f = {

                                                      $a=,0*5+($args|%{$_+0})
                                                      for($n=16;$i=$a.IndexOf($n)){
                                                      $a[$i]=0
                                                      $n=(-1,1+-6..-4+4..6|%{$a[$i+$_]}|sort)[-1]
                                                      }
                                                      $a|%{$s+=$_}
                                                      $s

                                                      }

                                                      @(
                                                      ,( 0 , ( 4, 3, 2, 1), ( 5, 6, 7, 8), (12, 11, 10, 9), (13, 14, 15, 16) )
                                                      ,( 0 , ( 8, 1, 9, 14), (11, 6, 5, 16), (13, 15, 2, 7), (10, 3, 12, 4) )
                                                      ,( 1 , ( 1, 2, 3, 4), ( 5, 6, 7, 8), ( 9, 10, 11, 12), (13, 14, 15, 16) )
                                                      ,( 3 , (10, 15, 14, 11), ( 9, 3, 1, 7), (13, 5, 12, 6), ( 2, 8, 4, 16) )
                                                      ,( 12 , ( 3, 7, 10, 5), ( 6, 8, 12, 13), (15, 9, 11, 4), (14, 1, 16, 2) )
                                                      ,( 34 , ( 8, 9, 3, 6), (13, 11, 7, 15), (12, 10, 16, 2), ( 4, 14, 1, 5) )
                                                      ,( 51 , ( 8, 11, 12, 9), (14, 5, 10, 16), ( 7, 3, 1, 6), (13, 4, 2, 15) )
                                                      ,( 78 , (13, 14, 1, 2), (16, 15, 3, 4), ( 5, 6, 7, 8), ( 9, 10, 11, 12) )
                                                      ,( 102, ( 9, 10, 11, 12), ( 1, 2, 4, 13), ( 7, 8, 5, 14), ( 3, 16, 6, 15) )
                                                      ,( 103, ( 9, 10, 11, 12), ( 1, 2, 7, 13), ( 6, 16, 4, 14), ( 3, 8, 5, 15) )
                                                      ) | % {
                                                      $expected, $a = $_
                                                      $result = &$f @a
                                                      "$($result-eq$expected): $result"
                                                      }


                                                      Output:



                                                      True: 0
                                                      True: 0
                                                      True: 1
                                                      True: 3
                                                      True: 12
                                                      True: 34
                                                      True: 51
                                                      True: 78
                                                      True: 102
                                                      True: 103


                                                      Explanation:



                                                      First, add top and bottom borders of 0 and make a single dimensional array:





                                                      0 0 0 0 0
                                                      # # # # 0
                                                      # # # # 0
                                                      # # # # 0
                                                      # # # # 0



                                                      0 0 0 0 0 # # # # 0 # # # # 0 # # # # 0 # # # # 0


                                                      Powershell returns $null if you try to get the value behind the end of the array.



                                                      Second, loop biggest neighbor pile started from 16 to non-zero-maximum. And nullify it (The Hungry Mouse eats it).





                                                      for($n=16;$i=$a.IndexOf($n)){
                                                      $a[$i]=0
                                                      $n=(-1,1+-6..-4+4..6|%{$a[$i+$_]}|sort)[-1]
                                                      }


                                                      Third, sum of the remaining piles.






                                                      share|improve this answer











                                                      $endgroup$
















                                                        2












                                                        2








                                                        2





                                                        $begingroup$

                                                        Powershell, 143 141 136 130 122 121 bytes





                                                        $a=,0*5+($args|%{$_+0})
                                                        for($n=16;$i=$a.IndexOf($n)){$a[$i]=0
                                                        $n=(-1,1+-6..-4+4..6|%{$a[$i+$_]}|sort)[-1]}$a|%{$s+=$_}
                                                        $s


                                                        Less golfed test script:



                                                        $f = {

                                                        $a=,0*5+($args|%{$_+0})
                                                        for($n=16;$i=$a.IndexOf($n)){
                                                        $a[$i]=0
                                                        $n=(-1,1+-6..-4+4..6|%{$a[$i+$_]}|sort)[-1]
                                                        }
                                                        $a|%{$s+=$_}
                                                        $s

                                                        }

                                                        @(
                                                        ,( 0 , ( 4, 3, 2, 1), ( 5, 6, 7, 8), (12, 11, 10, 9), (13, 14, 15, 16) )
                                                        ,( 0 , ( 8, 1, 9, 14), (11, 6, 5, 16), (13, 15, 2, 7), (10, 3, 12, 4) )
                                                        ,( 1 , ( 1, 2, 3, 4), ( 5, 6, 7, 8), ( 9, 10, 11, 12), (13, 14, 15, 16) )
                                                        ,( 3 , (10, 15, 14, 11), ( 9, 3, 1, 7), (13, 5, 12, 6), ( 2, 8, 4, 16) )
                                                        ,( 12 , ( 3, 7, 10, 5), ( 6, 8, 12, 13), (15, 9, 11, 4), (14, 1, 16, 2) )
                                                        ,( 34 , ( 8, 9, 3, 6), (13, 11, 7, 15), (12, 10, 16, 2), ( 4, 14, 1, 5) )
                                                        ,( 51 , ( 8, 11, 12, 9), (14, 5, 10, 16), ( 7, 3, 1, 6), (13, 4, 2, 15) )
                                                        ,( 78 , (13, 14, 1, 2), (16, 15, 3, 4), ( 5, 6, 7, 8), ( 9, 10, 11, 12) )
                                                        ,( 102, ( 9, 10, 11, 12), ( 1, 2, 4, 13), ( 7, 8, 5, 14), ( 3, 16, 6, 15) )
                                                        ,( 103, ( 9, 10, 11, 12), ( 1, 2, 7, 13), ( 6, 16, 4, 14), ( 3, 8, 5, 15) )
                                                        ) | % {
                                                        $expected, $a = $_
                                                        $result = &$f @a
                                                        "$($result-eq$expected): $result"
                                                        }


                                                        Output:



                                                        True: 0
                                                        True: 0
                                                        True: 1
                                                        True: 3
                                                        True: 12
                                                        True: 34
                                                        True: 51
                                                        True: 78
                                                        True: 102
                                                        True: 103


                                                        Explanation:



                                                        First, add top and bottom borders of 0 and make a single dimensional array:





                                                        0 0 0 0 0
                                                        # # # # 0
                                                        # # # # 0
                                                        # # # # 0
                                                        # # # # 0



                                                        0 0 0 0 0 # # # # 0 # # # # 0 # # # # 0 # # # # 0


                                                        Powershell returns $null if you try to get the value behind the end of the array.



                                                        Second, loop biggest neighbor pile started from 16 to non-zero-maximum. And nullify it (The Hungry Mouse eats it).





                                                        for($n=16;$i=$a.IndexOf($n)){
                                                        $a[$i]=0
                                                        $n=(-1,1+-6..-4+4..6|%{$a[$i+$_]}|sort)[-1]
                                                        }


                                                        Third, sum of the remaining piles.






                                                        share|improve this answer











                                                        $endgroup$



                                                        Powershell, 143 141 136 130 122 121 bytes





                                                        $a=,0*5+($args|%{$_+0})
                                                        for($n=16;$i=$a.IndexOf($n)){$a[$i]=0
                                                        $n=(-1,1+-6..-4+4..6|%{$a[$i+$_]}|sort)[-1]}$a|%{$s+=$_}
                                                        $s


                                                        Less golfed test script:



                                                        $f = {

                                                        $a=,0*5+($args|%{$_+0})
                                                        for($n=16;$i=$a.IndexOf($n)){
                                                        $a[$i]=0
                                                        $n=(-1,1+-6..-4+4..6|%{$a[$i+$_]}|sort)[-1]
                                                        }
                                                        $a|%{$s+=$_}
                                                        $s

                                                        }

                                                        @(
                                                        ,( 0 , ( 4, 3, 2, 1), ( 5, 6, 7, 8), (12, 11, 10, 9), (13, 14, 15, 16) )
                                                        ,( 0 , ( 8, 1, 9, 14), (11, 6, 5, 16), (13, 15, 2, 7), (10, 3, 12, 4) )
                                                        ,( 1 , ( 1, 2, 3, 4), ( 5, 6, 7, 8), ( 9, 10, 11, 12), (13, 14, 15, 16) )
                                                        ,( 3 , (10, 15, 14, 11), ( 9, 3, 1, 7), (13, 5, 12, 6), ( 2, 8, 4, 16) )
                                                        ,( 12 , ( 3, 7, 10, 5), ( 6, 8, 12, 13), (15, 9, 11, 4), (14, 1, 16, 2) )
                                                        ,( 34 , ( 8, 9, 3, 6), (13, 11, 7, 15), (12, 10, 16, 2), ( 4, 14, 1, 5) )
                                                        ,( 51 , ( 8, 11, 12, 9), (14, 5, 10, 16), ( 7, 3, 1, 6), (13, 4, 2, 15) )
                                                        ,( 78 , (13, 14, 1, 2), (16, 15, 3, 4), ( 5, 6, 7, 8), ( 9, 10, 11, 12) )
                                                        ,( 102, ( 9, 10, 11, 12), ( 1, 2, 4, 13), ( 7, 8, 5, 14), ( 3, 16, 6, 15) )
                                                        ,( 103, ( 9, 10, 11, 12), ( 1, 2, 7, 13), ( 6, 16, 4, 14), ( 3, 8, 5, 15) )
                                                        ) | % {
                                                        $expected, $a = $_
                                                        $result = &$f @a
                                                        "$($result-eq$expected): $result"
                                                        }


                                                        Output:



                                                        True: 0
                                                        True: 0
                                                        True: 1
                                                        True: 3
                                                        True: 12
                                                        True: 34
                                                        True: 51
                                                        True: 78
                                                        True: 102
                                                        True: 103


                                                        Explanation:



                                                        First, add top and bottom borders of 0 and make a single dimensional array:





                                                        0 0 0 0 0
                                                        # # # # 0
                                                        # # # # 0
                                                        # # # # 0
                                                        # # # # 0



                                                        0 0 0 0 0 # # # # 0 # # # # 0 # # # # 0 # # # # 0


                                                        Powershell returns $null if you try to get the value behind the end of the array.



                                                        Second, loop biggest neighbor pile started from 16 to non-zero-maximum. And nullify it (The Hungry Mouse eats it).





                                                        for($n=16;$i=$a.IndexOf($n)){
                                                        $a[$i]=0
                                                        $n=(-1,1+-6..-4+4..6|%{$a[$i+$_]}|sort)[-1]
                                                        }


                                                        Third, sum of the remaining piles.







                                                        share|improve this answer














                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                        share|improve this answer








                                                        edited Nov 21 '18 at 8:37

























                                                        answered Nov 20 '18 at 22:14









                                                        mazzymazzy

                                                        2,4651316




                                                        2,4651316























                                                            2












                                                            $begingroup$


                                                            APL (Dyalog Unicode), 42 41 bytesSBCS





                                                            16{×⍺:a∇⍨+/,m×⌈/⌈/⊢⌺3 3⊢a←⍵×~m←⍺=⍵⋄+/,⍵}⊢


                                                            Try it online!






                                                            share|improve this answer











                                                            $endgroup$


















                                                              2












                                                              $begingroup$


                                                              APL (Dyalog Unicode), 42 41 bytesSBCS





                                                              16{×⍺:a∇⍨+/,m×⌈/⌈/⊢⌺3 3⊢a←⍵×~m←⍺=⍵⋄+/,⍵}⊢


                                                              Try it online!






                                                              share|improve this answer











                                                              $endgroup$
















                                                                2












                                                                2








                                                                2





                                                                $begingroup$


                                                                APL (Dyalog Unicode), 42 41 bytesSBCS





                                                                16{×⍺:a∇⍨+/,m×⌈/⌈/⊢⌺3 3⊢a←⍵×~m←⍺=⍵⋄+/,⍵}⊢


                                                                Try it online!






                                                                share|improve this answer











                                                                $endgroup$




                                                                APL (Dyalog Unicode), 42 41 bytesSBCS





                                                                16{×⍺:a∇⍨+/,m×⌈/⌈/⊢⌺3 3⊢a←⍵×~m←⍺=⍵⋄+/,⍵}⊢


                                                                Try it online!







                                                                share|improve this answer














                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                share|improve this answer








                                                                edited Jan 17 at 13:36









                                                                Adám

                                                                28k273199




                                                                28k273199










                                                                answered Nov 24 '18 at 21:57









                                                                ngnngn

                                                                7,12112559




                                                                7,12112559























                                                                    1












                                                                    $begingroup$

                                                                    J, 82 bytes



                                                                    g=.](]*{:@[~:])]_1}~[:>./]{~((,-)1 5 6 7)+]i.{:
                                                                    [:+/[:(g^:_)16,~[:,0,~0,0,0,.~0,.]


                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                    I plan to golf this more tomorrow, and perhaps write a more J-ish solution similar to this one, but I figured I'd try the flattened approach since I hadn't done that before.






                                                                    share|improve this answer











                                                                    $endgroup$













                                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                                      Do you really need the leftmost ] in g?
                                                                      $endgroup$
                                                                      – Galen Ivanov
                                                                      Nov 20 '18 at 7:45






                                                                    • 1




                                                                      $begingroup$
                                                                      Thanks Galen, you're right. It's the least of the issues with this code :) I have a much better solution which I'll implement when I have time.
                                                                      $endgroup$
                                                                      – Jonah
                                                                      Nov 21 '18 at 1:26
















                                                                    1












                                                                    $begingroup$

                                                                    J, 82 bytes



                                                                    g=.](]*{:@[~:])]_1}~[:>./]{~((,-)1 5 6 7)+]i.{:
                                                                    [:+/[:(g^:_)16,~[:,0,~0,0,0,.~0,.]


                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                    I plan to golf this more tomorrow, and perhaps write a more J-ish solution similar to this one, but I figured I'd try the flattened approach since I hadn't done that before.






                                                                    share|improve this answer











                                                                    $endgroup$













                                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                                      Do you really need the leftmost ] in g?
                                                                      $endgroup$
                                                                      – Galen Ivanov
                                                                      Nov 20 '18 at 7:45






                                                                    • 1




                                                                      $begingroup$
                                                                      Thanks Galen, you're right. It's the least of the issues with this code :) I have a much better solution which I'll implement when I have time.
                                                                      $endgroup$
                                                                      – Jonah
                                                                      Nov 21 '18 at 1:26














                                                                    1












                                                                    1








                                                                    1





                                                                    $begingroup$

                                                                    J, 82 bytes



                                                                    g=.](]*{:@[~:])]_1}~[:>./]{~((,-)1 5 6 7)+]i.{:
                                                                    [:+/[:(g^:_)16,~[:,0,~0,0,0,.~0,.]


                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                    I plan to golf this more tomorrow, and perhaps write a more J-ish solution similar to this one, but I figured I'd try the flattened approach since I hadn't done that before.






                                                                    share|improve this answer











                                                                    $endgroup$



                                                                    J, 82 bytes



                                                                    g=.](]*{:@[~:])]_1}~[:>./]{~((,-)1 5 6 7)+]i.{:
                                                                    [:+/[:(g^:_)16,~[:,0,~0,0,0,.~0,.]


                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                    I plan to golf this more tomorrow, and perhaps write a more J-ish solution similar to this one, but I figured I'd try the flattened approach since I hadn't done that before.







                                                                    share|improve this answer














                                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                                    edited Nov 20 '18 at 7:00

























                                                                    answered Nov 20 '18 at 6:48









                                                                    JonahJonah

                                                                    2,121916




                                                                    2,121916












                                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                                      Do you really need the leftmost ] in g?
                                                                      $endgroup$
                                                                      – Galen Ivanov
                                                                      Nov 20 '18 at 7:45






                                                                    • 1




                                                                      $begingroup$
                                                                      Thanks Galen, you're right. It's the least of the issues with this code :) I have a much better solution which I'll implement when I have time.
                                                                      $endgroup$
                                                                      – Jonah
                                                                      Nov 21 '18 at 1:26


















                                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                                      Do you really need the leftmost ] in g?
                                                                      $endgroup$
                                                                      – Galen Ivanov
                                                                      Nov 20 '18 at 7:45






                                                                    • 1




                                                                      $begingroup$
                                                                      Thanks Galen, you're right. It's the least of the issues with this code :) I have a much better solution which I'll implement when I have time.
                                                                      $endgroup$
                                                                      – Jonah
                                                                      Nov 21 '18 at 1:26
















                                                                    $begingroup$
                                                                    Do you really need the leftmost ] in g?
                                                                    $endgroup$
                                                                    – Galen Ivanov
                                                                    Nov 20 '18 at 7:45




                                                                    $begingroup$
                                                                    Do you really need the leftmost ] in g?
                                                                    $endgroup$
                                                                    – Galen Ivanov
                                                                    Nov 20 '18 at 7:45




                                                                    1




                                                                    1




                                                                    $begingroup$
                                                                    Thanks Galen, you're right. It's the least of the issues with this code :) I have a much better solution which I'll implement when I have time.
                                                                    $endgroup$
                                                                    – Jonah
                                                                    Nov 21 '18 at 1:26




                                                                    $begingroup$
                                                                    Thanks Galen, you're right. It's the least of the issues with this code :) I have a much better solution which I'll implement when I have time.
                                                                    $endgroup$
                                                                    – Jonah
                                                                    Nov 21 '18 at 1:26











                                                                    1












                                                                    $begingroup$


                                                                    Red, 277 bytes



                                                                    func[a][k: 16 until[t:(index? find load form a k)- 1
                                                                    p: do rejoin[t / 4 + 1"x"t % 4 + 1]a/(p/1)/(p/2): 0
                                                                    m: 0 foreach d[-1 0x-1 1x-1 -1x0 1x0 -1x1 0x1 1][j: p + d
                                                                    if all[j/1 > 0 j/1 < 5 j/2 > 0 j/2 < 5 m < t: a/(j/1)/(j/2)][m: t]]0 = k: m]s: 0
                                                                    foreach n load form a[s: s + n]s]


                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                    It's really long solution and I'm not happy with it, but I spent so much time fixing it to work in TIO (apparently there are many differences between the Win and Linux stable versions of Red), so I post it anyway...



                                                                    More readable:



                                                                    f: func [ a ] [
                                                                    k: 16
                                                                    until [
                                                                    t: (index? find load form a n) - 1
                                                                    p: do rejoin [ t / 4 + 1 "x" t % 4 + 1 ]
                                                                    a/(p/1)/(p/2): 0
                                                                    m: 0
                                                                    foreach d [ -1 0x-1 1x-1 -1x0 1x0 -1x1 0x1 1 ] [
                                                                    j: p + d
                                                                    if all[ j/1 > 0
                                                                    j/1 < 5
                                                                    j/2 > 0
                                                                    j/2 < 5
                                                                    m < t: a/(j/1)/(j/2)
                                                                    ] [ m: t ]
                                                                    ]
                                                                    0 = k: m
                                                                    ]
                                                                    s: 0
                                                                    foreach n load form a [ s: s + n ]
                                                                    s
                                                                    ]





                                                                    share|improve this answer









                                                                    $endgroup$


















                                                                      1












                                                                      $begingroup$


                                                                      Red, 277 bytes



                                                                      func[a][k: 16 until[t:(index? find load form a k)- 1
                                                                      p: do rejoin[t / 4 + 1"x"t % 4 + 1]a/(p/1)/(p/2): 0
                                                                      m: 0 foreach d[-1 0x-1 1x-1 -1x0 1x0 -1x1 0x1 1][j: p + d
                                                                      if all[j/1 > 0 j/1 < 5 j/2 > 0 j/2 < 5 m < t: a/(j/1)/(j/2)][m: t]]0 = k: m]s: 0
                                                                      foreach n load form a[s: s + n]s]


                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                      It's really long solution and I'm not happy with it, but I spent so much time fixing it to work in TIO (apparently there are many differences between the Win and Linux stable versions of Red), so I post it anyway...



                                                                      More readable:



                                                                      f: func [ a ] [
                                                                      k: 16
                                                                      until [
                                                                      t: (index? find load form a n) - 1
                                                                      p: do rejoin [ t / 4 + 1 "x" t % 4 + 1 ]
                                                                      a/(p/1)/(p/2): 0
                                                                      m: 0
                                                                      foreach d [ -1 0x-1 1x-1 -1x0 1x0 -1x1 0x1 1 ] [
                                                                      j: p + d
                                                                      if all[ j/1 > 0
                                                                      j/1 < 5
                                                                      j/2 > 0
                                                                      j/2 < 5
                                                                      m < t: a/(j/1)/(j/2)
                                                                      ] [ m: t ]
                                                                      ]
                                                                      0 = k: m
                                                                      ]
                                                                      s: 0
                                                                      foreach n load form a [ s: s + n ]
                                                                      s
                                                                      ]





                                                                      share|improve this answer









                                                                      $endgroup$
















                                                                        1












                                                                        1








                                                                        1





                                                                        $begingroup$


                                                                        Red, 277 bytes



                                                                        func[a][k: 16 until[t:(index? find load form a k)- 1
                                                                        p: do rejoin[t / 4 + 1"x"t % 4 + 1]a/(p/1)/(p/2): 0
                                                                        m: 0 foreach d[-1 0x-1 1x-1 -1x0 1x0 -1x1 0x1 1][j: p + d
                                                                        if all[j/1 > 0 j/1 < 5 j/2 > 0 j/2 < 5 m < t: a/(j/1)/(j/2)][m: t]]0 = k: m]s: 0
                                                                        foreach n load form a[s: s + n]s]


                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                        It's really long solution and I'm not happy with it, but I spent so much time fixing it to work in TIO (apparently there are many differences between the Win and Linux stable versions of Red), so I post it anyway...



                                                                        More readable:



                                                                        f: func [ a ] [
                                                                        k: 16
                                                                        until [
                                                                        t: (index? find load form a n) - 1
                                                                        p: do rejoin [ t / 4 + 1 "x" t % 4 + 1 ]
                                                                        a/(p/1)/(p/2): 0
                                                                        m: 0
                                                                        foreach d [ -1 0x-1 1x-1 -1x0 1x0 -1x1 0x1 1 ] [
                                                                        j: p + d
                                                                        if all[ j/1 > 0
                                                                        j/1 < 5
                                                                        j/2 > 0
                                                                        j/2 < 5
                                                                        m < t: a/(j/1)/(j/2)
                                                                        ] [ m: t ]
                                                                        ]
                                                                        0 = k: m
                                                                        ]
                                                                        s: 0
                                                                        foreach n load form a [ s: s + n ]
                                                                        s
                                                                        ]





                                                                        share|improve this answer









                                                                        $endgroup$




                                                                        Red, 277 bytes



                                                                        func[a][k: 16 until[t:(index? find load form a k)- 1
                                                                        p: do rejoin[t / 4 + 1"x"t % 4 + 1]a/(p/1)/(p/2): 0
                                                                        m: 0 foreach d[-1 0x-1 1x-1 -1x0 1x0 -1x1 0x1 1][j: p + d
                                                                        if all[j/1 > 0 j/1 < 5 j/2 > 0 j/2 < 5 m < t: a/(j/1)/(j/2)][m: t]]0 = k: m]s: 0
                                                                        foreach n load form a[s: s + n]s]


                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                        It's really long solution and I'm not happy with it, but I spent so much time fixing it to work in TIO (apparently there are many differences between the Win and Linux stable versions of Red), so I post it anyway...



                                                                        More readable:



                                                                        f: func [ a ] [
                                                                        k: 16
                                                                        until [
                                                                        t: (index? find load form a n) - 1
                                                                        p: do rejoin [ t / 4 + 1 "x" t % 4 + 1 ]
                                                                        a/(p/1)/(p/2): 0
                                                                        m: 0
                                                                        foreach d [ -1 0x-1 1x-1 -1x0 1x0 -1x1 0x1 1 ] [
                                                                        j: p + d
                                                                        if all[ j/1 > 0
                                                                        j/1 < 5
                                                                        j/2 > 0
                                                                        j/2 < 5
                                                                        m < t: a/(j/1)/(j/2)
                                                                        ] [ m: t ]
                                                                        ]
                                                                        0 = k: m
                                                                        ]
                                                                        s: 0
                                                                        foreach n load form a [ s: s + n ]
                                                                        s
                                                                        ]






                                                                        share|improve this answer












                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                        share|improve this answer










                                                                        answered Nov 20 '18 at 9:02









                                                                        Galen IvanovGalen Ivanov

                                                                        6,78711033




                                                                        6,78711033























                                                                            1












                                                                            $begingroup$

                                                                            Not my best work. There's some definite improvements to be done, some probably fundamental to the algorithm used -- I'm sure it can be improved by using only an int, but I couldn't figure out how to efficiently enumerate neighbors that way. I'd love to see a PowerShell solution that uses only a single dimensional array!




                                                                            PowerShell Core, 348 bytes





                                                                            Function F($o){$t=120;$a=@{-1=,0*4;4=,0*4};0..3|%{$a[$_]=[int](-join$o[(3+18*$_)..(3+18*$_+13)]-split',')+,0};$m=16;while($m-gt0){0..3|%{$i=$_;0..3|%{if($a[$i][$_]-eq$m){$r=$i;$c=$_}}};$m=($a[$r-1][$c-1],$a[$r-1][$c],$a[$r-1][$c+1],$a[$r][$c+1],$a[$r][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c],$a[$r+1][$c+1]|Measure -Max).Maximum;$t-=$m;$a[$r][$c]=0}$t}


                                                                            Try it online!





                                                                            More readable version:



                                                                            Function F($o){
                                                                            $t=120;
                                                                            $a=@{-1=,0*4;4=,0*4};
                                                                            0..3|%{$a[$_]=[int](-join$o[(3+18*$_)..(3+18*$_+13)]-split',')+,0};
                                                                            $m=16;
                                                                            while($m-gt0){
                                                                            0..3|%{$i=$_;0..3|%{if($a[$i][$_]-eq$m){$r=$i;$c=$_}}};
                                                                            $m=($a[$r-1][$c-1],$a[$r-1][$c],$a[$r-1][$c+1],$a[$r][$c+1],$a[$r][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c],$a[$r+1][$c+1]|Measure -Max).Maximum;
                                                                            $t-=$m;
                                                                            $a[$r][$c]=0
                                                                            }
                                                                            $t
                                                                            }





                                                                            share|improve this answer









                                                                            $endgroup$









                                                                            • 1




                                                                              $begingroup$
                                                                              334 bytes after simple restructuring
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Veskah
                                                                              Jan 17 at 22:41










                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                              Oh yeah, weird thing I noticed is that trying to do the (array|sort)[-1] instead of Measure -max worked in PSv5 but was getting incorrect results in core. No idea why.
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Veskah
                                                                              Jan 17 at 22:44










                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                              Yeah, that's weird. I tested it on (0..10|sort)[-1] but it returns 10 on PSv5 but 9 on PS Core. This is because it treats it in lexicographical order instead of numeric. Shame, that.
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Jeff Freeman
                                                                              Jan 17 at 23:04










                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                              Classic Microsoft changing the important things.
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Veskah
                                                                              Jan 17 at 23:12










                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                              I agree in this case. I'm not sure why PS Core Sort throws an array of int32 to an array of strings. But, this is straying into a rant, so I'll digress. Thanks for the restructure!
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Jeff Freeman
                                                                              Jan 18 at 14:57
















                                                                            1












                                                                            $begingroup$

                                                                            Not my best work. There's some definite improvements to be done, some probably fundamental to the algorithm used -- I'm sure it can be improved by using only an int, but I couldn't figure out how to efficiently enumerate neighbors that way. I'd love to see a PowerShell solution that uses only a single dimensional array!




                                                                            PowerShell Core, 348 bytes





                                                                            Function F($o){$t=120;$a=@{-1=,0*4;4=,0*4};0..3|%{$a[$_]=[int](-join$o[(3+18*$_)..(3+18*$_+13)]-split',')+,0};$m=16;while($m-gt0){0..3|%{$i=$_;0..3|%{if($a[$i][$_]-eq$m){$r=$i;$c=$_}}};$m=($a[$r-1][$c-1],$a[$r-1][$c],$a[$r-1][$c+1],$a[$r][$c+1],$a[$r][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c],$a[$r+1][$c+1]|Measure -Max).Maximum;$t-=$m;$a[$r][$c]=0}$t}


                                                                            Try it online!





                                                                            More readable version:



                                                                            Function F($o){
                                                                            $t=120;
                                                                            $a=@{-1=,0*4;4=,0*4};
                                                                            0..3|%{$a[$_]=[int](-join$o[(3+18*$_)..(3+18*$_+13)]-split',')+,0};
                                                                            $m=16;
                                                                            while($m-gt0){
                                                                            0..3|%{$i=$_;0..3|%{if($a[$i][$_]-eq$m){$r=$i;$c=$_}}};
                                                                            $m=($a[$r-1][$c-1],$a[$r-1][$c],$a[$r-1][$c+1],$a[$r][$c+1],$a[$r][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c],$a[$r+1][$c+1]|Measure -Max).Maximum;
                                                                            $t-=$m;
                                                                            $a[$r][$c]=0
                                                                            }
                                                                            $t
                                                                            }





                                                                            share|improve this answer









                                                                            $endgroup$









                                                                            • 1




                                                                              $begingroup$
                                                                              334 bytes after simple restructuring
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Veskah
                                                                              Jan 17 at 22:41










                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                              Oh yeah, weird thing I noticed is that trying to do the (array|sort)[-1] instead of Measure -max worked in PSv5 but was getting incorrect results in core. No idea why.
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Veskah
                                                                              Jan 17 at 22:44










                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                              Yeah, that's weird. I tested it on (0..10|sort)[-1] but it returns 10 on PSv5 but 9 on PS Core. This is because it treats it in lexicographical order instead of numeric. Shame, that.
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Jeff Freeman
                                                                              Jan 17 at 23:04










                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                              Classic Microsoft changing the important things.
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Veskah
                                                                              Jan 17 at 23:12










                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                              I agree in this case. I'm not sure why PS Core Sort throws an array of int32 to an array of strings. But, this is straying into a rant, so I'll digress. Thanks for the restructure!
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Jeff Freeman
                                                                              Jan 18 at 14:57














                                                                            1












                                                                            1








                                                                            1





                                                                            $begingroup$

                                                                            Not my best work. There's some definite improvements to be done, some probably fundamental to the algorithm used -- I'm sure it can be improved by using only an int, but I couldn't figure out how to efficiently enumerate neighbors that way. I'd love to see a PowerShell solution that uses only a single dimensional array!




                                                                            PowerShell Core, 348 bytes





                                                                            Function F($o){$t=120;$a=@{-1=,0*4;4=,0*4};0..3|%{$a[$_]=[int](-join$o[(3+18*$_)..(3+18*$_+13)]-split',')+,0};$m=16;while($m-gt0){0..3|%{$i=$_;0..3|%{if($a[$i][$_]-eq$m){$r=$i;$c=$_}}};$m=($a[$r-1][$c-1],$a[$r-1][$c],$a[$r-1][$c+1],$a[$r][$c+1],$a[$r][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c],$a[$r+1][$c+1]|Measure -Max).Maximum;$t-=$m;$a[$r][$c]=0}$t}


                                                                            Try it online!





                                                                            More readable version:



                                                                            Function F($o){
                                                                            $t=120;
                                                                            $a=@{-1=,0*4;4=,0*4};
                                                                            0..3|%{$a[$_]=[int](-join$o[(3+18*$_)..(3+18*$_+13)]-split',')+,0};
                                                                            $m=16;
                                                                            while($m-gt0){
                                                                            0..3|%{$i=$_;0..3|%{if($a[$i][$_]-eq$m){$r=$i;$c=$_}}};
                                                                            $m=($a[$r-1][$c-1],$a[$r-1][$c],$a[$r-1][$c+1],$a[$r][$c+1],$a[$r][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c],$a[$r+1][$c+1]|Measure -Max).Maximum;
                                                                            $t-=$m;
                                                                            $a[$r][$c]=0
                                                                            }
                                                                            $t
                                                                            }





                                                                            share|improve this answer









                                                                            $endgroup$



                                                                            Not my best work. There's some definite improvements to be done, some probably fundamental to the algorithm used -- I'm sure it can be improved by using only an int, but I couldn't figure out how to efficiently enumerate neighbors that way. I'd love to see a PowerShell solution that uses only a single dimensional array!




                                                                            PowerShell Core, 348 bytes





                                                                            Function F($o){$t=120;$a=@{-1=,0*4;4=,0*4};0..3|%{$a[$_]=[int](-join$o[(3+18*$_)..(3+18*$_+13)]-split',')+,0};$m=16;while($m-gt0){0..3|%{$i=$_;0..3|%{if($a[$i][$_]-eq$m){$r=$i;$c=$_}}};$m=($a[$r-1][$c-1],$a[$r-1][$c],$a[$r-1][$c+1],$a[$r][$c+1],$a[$r][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c],$a[$r+1][$c+1]|Measure -Max).Maximum;$t-=$m;$a[$r][$c]=0}$t}


                                                                            Try it online!





                                                                            More readable version:



                                                                            Function F($o){
                                                                            $t=120;
                                                                            $a=@{-1=,0*4;4=,0*4};
                                                                            0..3|%{$a[$_]=[int](-join$o[(3+18*$_)..(3+18*$_+13)]-split',')+,0};
                                                                            $m=16;
                                                                            while($m-gt0){
                                                                            0..3|%{$i=$_;0..3|%{if($a[$i][$_]-eq$m){$r=$i;$c=$_}}};
                                                                            $m=($a[$r-1][$c-1],$a[$r-1][$c],$a[$r-1][$c+1],$a[$r][$c+1],$a[$r][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c-1],$a[$r+1][$c],$a[$r+1][$c+1]|Measure -Max).Maximum;
                                                                            $t-=$m;
                                                                            $a[$r][$c]=0
                                                                            }
                                                                            $t
                                                                            }






                                                                            share|improve this answer












                                                                            share|improve this answer



                                                                            share|improve this answer










                                                                            answered Nov 20 '18 at 19:10









                                                                            Jeff FreemanJeff Freeman

                                                                            20115




                                                                            20115








                                                                            • 1




                                                                              $begingroup$
                                                                              334 bytes after simple restructuring
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Veskah
                                                                              Jan 17 at 22:41










                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                              Oh yeah, weird thing I noticed is that trying to do the (array|sort)[-1] instead of Measure -max worked in PSv5 but was getting incorrect results in core. No idea why.
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Veskah
                                                                              Jan 17 at 22:44










                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                              Yeah, that's weird. I tested it on (0..10|sort)[-1] but it returns 10 on PSv5 but 9 on PS Core. This is because it treats it in lexicographical order instead of numeric. Shame, that.
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Jeff Freeman
                                                                              Jan 17 at 23:04










                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                              Classic Microsoft changing the important things.
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Veskah
                                                                              Jan 17 at 23:12










                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                              I agree in this case. I'm not sure why PS Core Sort throws an array of int32 to an array of strings. But, this is straying into a rant, so I'll digress. Thanks for the restructure!
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Jeff Freeman
                                                                              Jan 18 at 14:57














                                                                            • 1




                                                                              $begingroup$
                                                                              334 bytes after simple restructuring
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Veskah
                                                                              Jan 17 at 22:41










                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                              Oh yeah, weird thing I noticed is that trying to do the (array|sort)[-1] instead of Measure -max worked in PSv5 but was getting incorrect results in core. No idea why.
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Veskah
                                                                              Jan 17 at 22:44










                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                              Yeah, that's weird. I tested it on (0..10|sort)[-1] but it returns 10 on PSv5 but 9 on PS Core. This is because it treats it in lexicographical order instead of numeric. Shame, that.
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Jeff Freeman
                                                                              Jan 17 at 23:04










                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                              Classic Microsoft changing the important things.
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Veskah
                                                                              Jan 17 at 23:12










                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                              I agree in this case. I'm not sure why PS Core Sort throws an array of int32 to an array of strings. But, this is straying into a rant, so I'll digress. Thanks for the restructure!
                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                              – Jeff Freeman
                                                                              Jan 18 at 14:57








                                                                            1




                                                                            1




                                                                            $begingroup$
                                                                            334 bytes after simple restructuring
                                                                            $endgroup$
                                                                            – Veskah
                                                                            Jan 17 at 22:41




                                                                            $begingroup$
                                                                            334 bytes after simple restructuring
                                                                            $endgroup$
                                                                            – Veskah
                                                                            Jan 17 at 22:41












                                                                            $begingroup$
                                                                            Oh yeah, weird thing I noticed is that trying to do the (array|sort)[-1] instead of Measure -max worked in PSv5 but was getting incorrect results in core. No idea why.
                                                                            $endgroup$
                                                                            – Veskah
                                                                            Jan 17 at 22:44




                                                                            $begingroup$
                                                                            Oh yeah, weird thing I noticed is that trying to do the (array|sort)[-1] instead of Measure -max worked in PSv5 but was getting incorrect results in core. No idea why.
                                                                            $endgroup$
                                                                            – Veskah
                                                                            Jan 17 at 22:44












                                                                            $begingroup$
                                                                            Yeah, that's weird. I tested it on (0..10|sort)[-1] but it returns 10 on PSv5 but 9 on PS Core. This is because it treats it in lexicographical order instead of numeric. Shame, that.
                                                                            $endgroup$
                                                                            – Jeff Freeman
                                                                            Jan 17 at 23:04




                                                                            $begingroup$
                                                                            Yeah, that's weird. I tested it on (0..10|sort)[-1] but it returns 10 on PSv5 but 9 on PS Core. This is because it treats it in lexicographical order instead of numeric. Shame, that.
                                                                            $endgroup$
                                                                            – Jeff Freeman
                                                                            Jan 17 at 23:04












                                                                            $begingroup$
                                                                            Classic Microsoft changing the important things.
                                                                            $endgroup$
                                                                            – Veskah
                                                                            Jan 17 at 23:12




                                                                            $begingroup$
                                                                            Classic Microsoft changing the important things.
                                                                            $endgroup$
                                                                            – Veskah
                                                                            Jan 17 at 23:12












                                                                            $begingroup$
                                                                            I agree in this case. I'm not sure why PS Core Sort throws an array of int32 to an array of strings. But, this is straying into a rant, so I'll digress. Thanks for the restructure!
                                                                            $endgroup$
                                                                            – Jeff Freeman
                                                                            Jan 18 at 14:57




                                                                            $begingroup$
                                                                            I agree in this case. I'm not sure why PS Core Sort throws an array of int32 to an array of strings. But, this is straying into a rant, so I'll digress. Thanks for the restructure!
                                                                            $endgroup$
                                                                            – Jeff Freeman
                                                                            Jan 18 at 14:57











                                                                            1












                                                                            $begingroup$


                                                                            Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 149 bytes



                                                                            (g@p_:=#&@@Position[s,Max@p];m=g[s=#];While[Tr[b=s[[##]]&@@#&/@Select[#+m&/@Tuples[{-1,0,1},2],Max@#<5&&Min@#>0&]]>0,m=g@b;s[[##&@@m]]=0];Tr[Tr/@s])&


                                                                            Try it online!






                                                                            share|improve this answer











                                                                            $endgroup$


















                                                                              1












                                                                              $begingroup$


                                                                              Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 149 bytes



                                                                              (g@p_:=#&@@Position[s,Max@p];m=g[s=#];While[Tr[b=s[[##]]&@@#&/@Select[#+m&/@Tuples[{-1,0,1},2],Max@#<5&&Min@#>0&]]>0,m=g@b;s[[##&@@m]]=0];Tr[Tr/@s])&


                                                                              Try it online!






                                                                              share|improve this answer











                                                                              $endgroup$
















                                                                                1












                                                                                1








                                                                                1





                                                                                $begingroup$


                                                                                Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 149 bytes



                                                                                (g@p_:=#&@@Position[s,Max@p];m=g[s=#];While[Tr[b=s[[##]]&@@#&/@Select[#+m&/@Tuples[{-1,0,1},2],Max@#<5&&Min@#>0&]]>0,m=g@b;s[[##&@@m]]=0];Tr[Tr/@s])&


                                                                                Try it online!






                                                                                share|improve this answer











                                                                                $endgroup$




                                                                                Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 149 bytes



                                                                                (g@p_:=#&@@Position[s,Max@p];m=g[s=#];While[Tr[b=s[[##]]&@@#&/@Select[#+m&/@Tuples[{-1,0,1},2],Max@#<5&&Min@#>0&]]>0,m=g@b;s[[##&@@m]]=0];Tr[Tr/@s])&


                                                                                Try it online!







                                                                                share|improve this answer














                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                share|improve this answer








                                                                                edited Nov 27 '18 at 5:41

























                                                                                answered Nov 27 '18 at 4:49









                                                                                J42161217J42161217

                                                                                13.1k21150




                                                                                13.1k21150























                                                                                    1












                                                                                    $begingroup$

                                                                                    JavaScript (ES7), 97 bytes



                                                                                    Takes input as a flattened array.





                                                                                    f=(a,s=p=136,m,d)=>a.map((v,n)=>v<m|(n%4-p%4)**2+(n-p)**2/9>d||(q=n,m=v))|m?f(a,s-m,a[p=q]=0,4):s


                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                    Commented



                                                                                    f = (                    // f= recursive function taking:
                                                                                    a, // - a = flattened input array
                                                                                    s = // - s = sum of cheese piles, initialized to 1 + 2 + .. + 16 = 136
                                                                                    p = 136, // - p = position of the mouse, initially outside the board
                                                                                    m, // - m = maximum pile, initially undefined
                                                                                    d // - d = distance threshold, initially undefined
                                                                                    ) => //
                                                                                    a.map((v, n) => // for each pile v at position n in a:
                                                                                    v < m | // unless this pile is not better than the current maximum
                                                                                    (n % 4 - p % 4) ** 2 // or (n % 4 - p % 4)²
                                                                                    + (n - p) ** 2 / 9 // + (n - p)² / 9
                                                                                    > d || // is greater than the distance threshold:
                                                                                    (q = n, m = v) // update m to v and q to n
                                                                                    ) // end of map()
                                                                                    | m ? // if we've found a new pile to eat:
                                                                                    f( // do a recursive call:
                                                                                    a, // pass a unchanged
                                                                                    s - m, // update s by subtracting the pile we've just eaten
                                                                                    a[p = q] = 0, // clear a[q], update p to q and set m = 0
                                                                                    4 // use d = 4 for all next iterations
                                                                                    ) // end of recursive call
                                                                                    : // else:
                                                                                    s // stop recursion and return s





                                                                                    share|improve this answer











                                                                                    $endgroup$













                                                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                                                      Yep, I never would have got anywhere close to that!
                                                                                      $endgroup$
                                                                                      – Shaggy
                                                                                      Dec 13 '18 at 16:16
















                                                                                    1












                                                                                    $begingroup$

                                                                                    JavaScript (ES7), 97 bytes



                                                                                    Takes input as a flattened array.





                                                                                    f=(a,s=p=136,m,d)=>a.map((v,n)=>v<m|(n%4-p%4)**2+(n-p)**2/9>d||(q=n,m=v))|m?f(a,s-m,a[p=q]=0,4):s


                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                    Commented



                                                                                    f = (                    // f= recursive function taking:
                                                                                    a, // - a = flattened input array
                                                                                    s = // - s = sum of cheese piles, initialized to 1 + 2 + .. + 16 = 136
                                                                                    p = 136, // - p = position of the mouse, initially outside the board
                                                                                    m, // - m = maximum pile, initially undefined
                                                                                    d // - d = distance threshold, initially undefined
                                                                                    ) => //
                                                                                    a.map((v, n) => // for each pile v at position n in a:
                                                                                    v < m | // unless this pile is not better than the current maximum
                                                                                    (n % 4 - p % 4) ** 2 // or (n % 4 - p % 4)²
                                                                                    + (n - p) ** 2 / 9 // + (n - p)² / 9
                                                                                    > d || // is greater than the distance threshold:
                                                                                    (q = n, m = v) // update m to v and q to n
                                                                                    ) // end of map()
                                                                                    | m ? // if we've found a new pile to eat:
                                                                                    f( // do a recursive call:
                                                                                    a, // pass a unchanged
                                                                                    s - m, // update s by subtracting the pile we've just eaten
                                                                                    a[p = q] = 0, // clear a[q], update p to q and set m = 0
                                                                                    4 // use d = 4 for all next iterations
                                                                                    ) // end of recursive call
                                                                                    : // else:
                                                                                    s // stop recursion and return s





                                                                                    share|improve this answer











                                                                                    $endgroup$













                                                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                                                      Yep, I never would have got anywhere close to that!
                                                                                      $endgroup$
                                                                                      – Shaggy
                                                                                      Dec 13 '18 at 16:16














                                                                                    1












                                                                                    1








                                                                                    1





                                                                                    $begingroup$

                                                                                    JavaScript (ES7), 97 bytes



                                                                                    Takes input as a flattened array.





                                                                                    f=(a,s=p=136,m,d)=>a.map((v,n)=>v<m|(n%4-p%4)**2+(n-p)**2/9>d||(q=n,m=v))|m?f(a,s-m,a[p=q]=0,4):s


                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                    Commented



                                                                                    f = (                    // f= recursive function taking:
                                                                                    a, // - a = flattened input array
                                                                                    s = // - s = sum of cheese piles, initialized to 1 + 2 + .. + 16 = 136
                                                                                    p = 136, // - p = position of the mouse, initially outside the board
                                                                                    m, // - m = maximum pile, initially undefined
                                                                                    d // - d = distance threshold, initially undefined
                                                                                    ) => //
                                                                                    a.map((v, n) => // for each pile v at position n in a:
                                                                                    v < m | // unless this pile is not better than the current maximum
                                                                                    (n % 4 - p % 4) ** 2 // or (n % 4 - p % 4)²
                                                                                    + (n - p) ** 2 / 9 // + (n - p)² / 9
                                                                                    > d || // is greater than the distance threshold:
                                                                                    (q = n, m = v) // update m to v and q to n
                                                                                    ) // end of map()
                                                                                    | m ? // if we've found a new pile to eat:
                                                                                    f( // do a recursive call:
                                                                                    a, // pass a unchanged
                                                                                    s - m, // update s by subtracting the pile we've just eaten
                                                                                    a[p = q] = 0, // clear a[q], update p to q and set m = 0
                                                                                    4 // use d = 4 for all next iterations
                                                                                    ) // end of recursive call
                                                                                    : // else:
                                                                                    s // stop recursion and return s





                                                                                    share|improve this answer











                                                                                    $endgroup$



                                                                                    JavaScript (ES7), 97 bytes



                                                                                    Takes input as a flattened array.





                                                                                    f=(a,s=p=136,m,d)=>a.map((v,n)=>v<m|(n%4-p%4)**2+(n-p)**2/9>d||(q=n,m=v))|m?f(a,s-m,a[p=q]=0,4):s


                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                    Commented



                                                                                    f = (                    // f= recursive function taking:
                                                                                    a, // - a = flattened input array
                                                                                    s = // - s = sum of cheese piles, initialized to 1 + 2 + .. + 16 = 136
                                                                                    p = 136, // - p = position of the mouse, initially outside the board
                                                                                    m, // - m = maximum pile, initially undefined
                                                                                    d // - d = distance threshold, initially undefined
                                                                                    ) => //
                                                                                    a.map((v, n) => // for each pile v at position n in a:
                                                                                    v < m | // unless this pile is not better than the current maximum
                                                                                    (n % 4 - p % 4) ** 2 // or (n % 4 - p % 4)²
                                                                                    + (n - p) ** 2 / 9 // + (n - p)² / 9
                                                                                    > d || // is greater than the distance threshold:
                                                                                    (q = n, m = v) // update m to v and q to n
                                                                                    ) // end of map()
                                                                                    | m ? // if we've found a new pile to eat:
                                                                                    f( // do a recursive call:
                                                                                    a, // pass a unchanged
                                                                                    s - m, // update s by subtracting the pile we've just eaten
                                                                                    a[p = q] = 0, // clear a[q], update p to q and set m = 0
                                                                                    4 // use d = 4 for all next iterations
                                                                                    ) // end of recursive call
                                                                                    : // else:
                                                                                    s // stop recursion and return s






                                                                                    share|improve this answer














                                                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                                                    edited Dec 13 '18 at 15:15

























                                                                                    answered Dec 13 '18 at 15:07









                                                                                    ArnauldArnauld

                                                                                    76.1k693320




                                                                                    76.1k693320












                                                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                                                      Yep, I never would have got anywhere close to that!
                                                                                      $endgroup$
                                                                                      – Shaggy
                                                                                      Dec 13 '18 at 16:16


















                                                                                    • $begingroup$
                                                                                      Yep, I never would have got anywhere close to that!
                                                                                      $endgroup$
                                                                                      – Shaggy
                                                                                      Dec 13 '18 at 16:16
















                                                                                    $begingroup$
                                                                                    Yep, I never would have got anywhere close to that!
                                                                                    $endgroup$
                                                                                    – Shaggy
                                                                                    Dec 13 '18 at 16:16




                                                                                    $begingroup$
                                                                                    Yep, I never would have got anywhere close to that!
                                                                                    $endgroup$
                                                                                    – Shaggy
                                                                                    Dec 13 '18 at 16:16











                                                                                    1












                                                                                    $begingroup$


                                                                                    Add++, 281 bytes



                                                                                    D,f,@@,VBFB]G€=dbLRz€¦*bMd1_4/i1+$4%B]4 4b[$z€¦o
                                                                                    D,g,@@,c2112011022200200BD1€Ω_2$TAVb]8*z€kþbNG€lbM
                                                                                    D,k,@~,z€¦+d4€>¦+$d1€<¦+$@+!*
                                                                                    D,l,@@#,bUV1_$:G1_$:
                                                                                    D,h,@@,{l}A$bUV1_$:$VbU","jG$t0€obU0j","$t€iA$bUpVdbLRG€=€!z€¦*$b]4*$z€¦o
                                                                                    y:?
                                                                                    m:16
                                                                                    t:120
                                                                                    Wm,`x,$f>y>m,`m,$g>x>y,`y,$h>x>y,`t,-m
                                                                                    Ot


                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                    Oof, this is a complicated one.



                                                                                    Verify all test cases



                                                                                    How it works



                                                                                    For this explanation, we will use the input



                                                                                    $M = left[begin{matrix}
                                                                                    3 & 7 & 10 & 5 \
                                                                                    6 & 8 & 12 & 13 \
                                                                                    15 & 9 & 11 & 4 \
                                                                                    14 & 1 & 16 & 2 \
                                                                                    end{matrix}right]$



                                                                                    We start by defining a series of helper functions. We will use $x$ to represent an integer such that $1 le x le 16$, $M$ to, initially, represent the $4text{x}4$ input matrix. The functions are:




                                                                                    • $f(x, M)$: Given a value and a $4text{x}4$ matrix, return the co-ordinates of $x$ in $M$ e.g. if $x = 16$ and $M$ is above, $f(x, M) = (4, 3)$



                                                                                    • $g(M, y)$: Given a matrix and two co-ordinates, return the largest of the neighbours of the value at that point e.g. using $f(x, M)$ from above, $g(M, f(x, M)) = 11$



                                                                                      This implements the two helper functions:



                                                                                      $k(x)$ which removes any co-ordinates which would wrap around or be out of bounds



                                                                                      $l(M, y)$ which, given a matrix and co-ordinates, returns the value at those co-ordinates



                                                                                    • $h(y, M)$ which, given a matrix and co-ordinates, sets the value at those indexes to $0$



                                                                                    After these functions are defined, we come to the main body of the program. The first step is to assign the four variables, x, y, m and t. x is set to $0$ by default, y to the input, m to $16$ (the first value to search for) and t to $120 : (1 + 2 + cdots + 14 + 15)$.



                                                                                    Next, we enter a while loop, that loops while m does not equal $0$. The steps in the loop go something along the lines of



                                                                                    While m $neq 0$:




                                                                                    • Set x to $f(textbf{y}, textbf{m})$. For the first iteration, this sets x to the co-ordinates of $16$ is $M$ ($x := (4, 3)$ in our example)

                                                                                    • Set m to $g(textbf{x}, textbf{y})$. This yields the largest new neighbour to m, or $0$, if there are no new neighbours (which ends the while loop).

                                                                                    • Set y to $h(textbf{x}, textbf{y})$. This sets the previous value of m ($16$ in the first iteration) to $0$, in order for the previous step to work

                                                                                    • Set t to $textbf{t} - textbf{m}$, removing that value from the total value amount.


                                                                                    Finally, output t, i.e. the remaining, non collected values.






                                                                                    share|improve this answer









                                                                                    $endgroup$


















                                                                                      1












                                                                                      $begingroup$


                                                                                      Add++, 281 bytes



                                                                                      D,f,@@,VBFB]G€=dbLRz€¦*bMd1_4/i1+$4%B]4 4b[$z€¦o
                                                                                      D,g,@@,c2112011022200200BD1€Ω_2$TAVb]8*z€kþbNG€lbM
                                                                                      D,k,@~,z€¦+d4€>¦+$d1€<¦+$@+!*
                                                                                      D,l,@@#,bUV1_$:G1_$:
                                                                                      D,h,@@,{l}A$bUV1_$:$VbU","jG$t0€obU0j","$t€iA$bUpVdbLRG€=€!z€¦*$b]4*$z€¦o
                                                                                      y:?
                                                                                      m:16
                                                                                      t:120
                                                                                      Wm,`x,$f>y>m,`m,$g>x>y,`y,$h>x>y,`t,-m
                                                                                      Ot


                                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                                      Oof, this is a complicated one.



                                                                                      Verify all test cases



                                                                                      How it works



                                                                                      For this explanation, we will use the input



                                                                                      $M = left[begin{matrix}
                                                                                      3 & 7 & 10 & 5 \
                                                                                      6 & 8 & 12 & 13 \
                                                                                      15 & 9 & 11 & 4 \
                                                                                      14 & 1 & 16 & 2 \
                                                                                      end{matrix}right]$



                                                                                      We start by defining a series of helper functions. We will use $x$ to represent an integer such that $1 le x le 16$, $M$ to, initially, represent the $4text{x}4$ input matrix. The functions are:




                                                                                      • $f(x, M)$: Given a value and a $4text{x}4$ matrix, return the co-ordinates of $x$ in $M$ e.g. if $x = 16$ and $M$ is above, $f(x, M) = (4, 3)$



                                                                                      • $g(M, y)$: Given a matrix and two co-ordinates, return the largest of the neighbours of the value at that point e.g. using $f(x, M)$ from above, $g(M, f(x, M)) = 11$



                                                                                        This implements the two helper functions:



                                                                                        $k(x)$ which removes any co-ordinates which would wrap around or be out of bounds



                                                                                        $l(M, y)$ which, given a matrix and co-ordinates, returns the value at those co-ordinates



                                                                                      • $h(y, M)$ which, given a matrix and co-ordinates, sets the value at those indexes to $0$



                                                                                      After these functions are defined, we come to the main body of the program. The first step is to assign the four variables, x, y, m and t. x is set to $0$ by default, y to the input, m to $16$ (the first value to search for) and t to $120 : (1 + 2 + cdots + 14 + 15)$.



                                                                                      Next, we enter a while loop, that loops while m does not equal $0$. The steps in the loop go something along the lines of



                                                                                      While m $neq 0$:




                                                                                      • Set x to $f(textbf{y}, textbf{m})$. For the first iteration, this sets x to the co-ordinates of $16$ is $M$ ($x := (4, 3)$ in our example)

                                                                                      • Set m to $g(textbf{x}, textbf{y})$. This yields the largest new neighbour to m, or $0$, if there are no new neighbours (which ends the while loop).

                                                                                      • Set y to $h(textbf{x}, textbf{y})$. This sets the previous value of m ($16$ in the first iteration) to $0$, in order for the previous step to work

                                                                                      • Set t to $textbf{t} - textbf{m}$, removing that value from the total value amount.


                                                                                      Finally, output t, i.e. the remaining, non collected values.






                                                                                      share|improve this answer









                                                                                      $endgroup$
















                                                                                        1












                                                                                        1








                                                                                        1





                                                                                        $begingroup$


                                                                                        Add++, 281 bytes



                                                                                        D,f,@@,VBFB]G€=dbLRz€¦*bMd1_4/i1+$4%B]4 4b[$z€¦o
                                                                                        D,g,@@,c2112011022200200BD1€Ω_2$TAVb]8*z€kþbNG€lbM
                                                                                        D,k,@~,z€¦+d4€>¦+$d1€<¦+$@+!*
                                                                                        D,l,@@#,bUV1_$:G1_$:
                                                                                        D,h,@@,{l}A$bUV1_$:$VbU","jG$t0€obU0j","$t€iA$bUpVdbLRG€=€!z€¦*$b]4*$z€¦o
                                                                                        y:?
                                                                                        m:16
                                                                                        t:120
                                                                                        Wm,`x,$f>y>m,`m,$g>x>y,`y,$h>x>y,`t,-m
                                                                                        Ot


                                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                                        Oof, this is a complicated one.



                                                                                        Verify all test cases



                                                                                        How it works



                                                                                        For this explanation, we will use the input



                                                                                        $M = left[begin{matrix}
                                                                                        3 & 7 & 10 & 5 \
                                                                                        6 & 8 & 12 & 13 \
                                                                                        15 & 9 & 11 & 4 \
                                                                                        14 & 1 & 16 & 2 \
                                                                                        end{matrix}right]$



                                                                                        We start by defining a series of helper functions. We will use $x$ to represent an integer such that $1 le x le 16$, $M$ to, initially, represent the $4text{x}4$ input matrix. The functions are:




                                                                                        • $f(x, M)$: Given a value and a $4text{x}4$ matrix, return the co-ordinates of $x$ in $M$ e.g. if $x = 16$ and $M$ is above, $f(x, M) = (4, 3)$



                                                                                        • $g(M, y)$: Given a matrix and two co-ordinates, return the largest of the neighbours of the value at that point e.g. using $f(x, M)$ from above, $g(M, f(x, M)) = 11$



                                                                                          This implements the two helper functions:



                                                                                          $k(x)$ which removes any co-ordinates which would wrap around or be out of bounds



                                                                                          $l(M, y)$ which, given a matrix and co-ordinates, returns the value at those co-ordinates



                                                                                        • $h(y, M)$ which, given a matrix and co-ordinates, sets the value at those indexes to $0$



                                                                                        After these functions are defined, we come to the main body of the program. The first step is to assign the four variables, x, y, m and t. x is set to $0$ by default, y to the input, m to $16$ (the first value to search for) and t to $120 : (1 + 2 + cdots + 14 + 15)$.



                                                                                        Next, we enter a while loop, that loops while m does not equal $0$. The steps in the loop go something along the lines of



                                                                                        While m $neq 0$:




                                                                                        • Set x to $f(textbf{y}, textbf{m})$. For the first iteration, this sets x to the co-ordinates of $16$ is $M$ ($x := (4, 3)$ in our example)

                                                                                        • Set m to $g(textbf{x}, textbf{y})$. This yields the largest new neighbour to m, or $0$, if there are no new neighbours (which ends the while loop).

                                                                                        • Set y to $h(textbf{x}, textbf{y})$. This sets the previous value of m ($16$ in the first iteration) to $0$, in order for the previous step to work

                                                                                        • Set t to $textbf{t} - textbf{m}$, removing that value from the total value amount.


                                                                                        Finally, output t, i.e. the remaining, non collected values.






                                                                                        share|improve this answer









                                                                                        $endgroup$




                                                                                        Add++, 281 bytes



                                                                                        D,f,@@,VBFB]G€=dbLRz€¦*bMd1_4/i1+$4%B]4 4b[$z€¦o
                                                                                        D,g,@@,c2112011022200200BD1€Ω_2$TAVb]8*z€kþbNG€lbM
                                                                                        D,k,@~,z€¦+d4€>¦+$d1€<¦+$@+!*
                                                                                        D,l,@@#,bUV1_$:G1_$:
                                                                                        D,h,@@,{l}A$bUV1_$:$VbU","jG$t0€obU0j","$t€iA$bUpVdbLRG€=€!z€¦*$b]4*$z€¦o
                                                                                        y:?
                                                                                        m:16
                                                                                        t:120
                                                                                        Wm,`x,$f>y>m,`m,$g>x>y,`y,$h>x>y,`t,-m
                                                                                        Ot


                                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                                        Oof, this is a complicated one.



                                                                                        Verify all test cases



                                                                                        How it works



                                                                                        For this explanation, we will use the input



                                                                                        $M = left[begin{matrix}
                                                                                        3 & 7 & 10 & 5 \
                                                                                        6 & 8 & 12 & 13 \
                                                                                        15 & 9 & 11 & 4 \
                                                                                        14 & 1 & 16 & 2 \
                                                                                        end{matrix}right]$



                                                                                        We start by defining a series of helper functions. We will use $x$ to represent an integer such that $1 le x le 16$, $M$ to, initially, represent the $4text{x}4$ input matrix. The functions are:




                                                                                        • $f(x, M)$: Given a value and a $4text{x}4$ matrix, return the co-ordinates of $x$ in $M$ e.g. if $x = 16$ and $M$ is above, $f(x, M) = (4, 3)$



                                                                                        • $g(M, y)$: Given a matrix and two co-ordinates, return the largest of the neighbours of the value at that point e.g. using $f(x, M)$ from above, $g(M, f(x, M)) = 11$



                                                                                          This implements the two helper functions:



                                                                                          $k(x)$ which removes any co-ordinates which would wrap around or be out of bounds



                                                                                          $l(M, y)$ which, given a matrix and co-ordinates, returns the value at those co-ordinates



                                                                                        • $h(y, M)$ which, given a matrix and co-ordinates, sets the value at those indexes to $0$



                                                                                        After these functions are defined, we come to the main body of the program. The first step is to assign the four variables, x, y, m and t. x is set to $0$ by default, y to the input, m to $16$ (the first value to search for) and t to $120 : (1 + 2 + cdots + 14 + 15)$.



                                                                                        Next, we enter a while loop, that loops while m does not equal $0$. The steps in the loop go something along the lines of



                                                                                        While m $neq 0$:




                                                                                        • Set x to $f(textbf{y}, textbf{m})$. For the first iteration, this sets x to the co-ordinates of $16$ is $M$ ($x := (4, 3)$ in our example)

                                                                                        • Set m to $g(textbf{x}, textbf{y})$. This yields the largest new neighbour to m, or $0$, if there are no new neighbours (which ends the while loop).

                                                                                        • Set y to $h(textbf{x}, textbf{y})$. This sets the previous value of m ($16$ in the first iteration) to $0$, in order for the previous step to work

                                                                                        • Set t to $textbf{t} - textbf{m}$, removing that value from the total value amount.


                                                                                        Finally, output t, i.e. the remaining, non collected values.







                                                                                        share|improve this answer












                                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                                        share|improve this answer










                                                                                        answered Dec 31 '18 at 14:04









                                                                                        caird coinheringaahingcaird coinheringaahing

                                                                                        7,52632985




                                                                                        7,52632985























                                                                                            0












                                                                                            $begingroup$

                                                                                            C (gcc), 250 bytes



                                                                                            x;y;i;b;R;C;
                                                                                            g(int a[4],int X,int Y){b=a[Y][X]=0;for(x=-1;x&lt2;++x)for(y=-1;y<2;++y)if(!(x+X&~3||y+Y&~3||a[y+Y][x+X]<b))b=a[C=Y+y][R=X+x];for(i=x=0;i<16;++i)x+=a[0][i];return b?g(a,R,C):x;}
                                                                                            s(int*a){for(i=0;i<16;++i)if(a[i]==16)return g(a,i%4,i/4);}


                                                                                            Try it online!



                                                                                            Note: This submission modifies the input array.



                                                                                            s() is the function to call with an argument of a mutable int[16] (which is the same in-memory as an int[4][4], which is what g() interprets it as).



                                                                                            s() finds the location of the 16 in the array, then passes this information to g, which is a recursive function that takes a location, sets the number at that location to 0, and then:




                                                                                            • If there is a positive number adjacent to it, recurse with the location of the largest adjacent number


                                                                                            • Else, return the sum of the numbers in the array.







                                                                                            share|improve this answer









                                                                                            $endgroup$













                                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                                              s(int*a){for(i=0;a[i]<16;++i);return g(a,i%4,i/4);}
                                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                                              – RiaD
                                                                                              Nov 24 '18 at 14:37










                                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                                              if g returns sum of eaten you don't need to calculate sum in it. Just return 16*17/2-g() at the end of s
                                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                                              – RiaD
                                                                                              Nov 24 '18 at 14:43










                                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                                              can you use bitwise or instead if logical or?
                                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                                              – RiaD
                                                                                              Nov 24 '18 at 14:45










                                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                                              211 bytes
                                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                                              – ceilingcat
                                                                                              Dec 31 '18 at 18:33
















                                                                                            0












                                                                                            $begingroup$

                                                                                            C (gcc), 250 bytes



                                                                                            x;y;i;b;R;C;
                                                                                            g(int a[4],int X,int Y){b=a[Y][X]=0;for(x=-1;x&lt2;++x)for(y=-1;y<2;++y)if(!(x+X&~3||y+Y&~3||a[y+Y][x+X]<b))b=a[C=Y+y][R=X+x];for(i=x=0;i<16;++i)x+=a[0][i];return b?g(a,R,C):x;}
                                                                                            s(int*a){for(i=0;i<16;++i)if(a[i]==16)return g(a,i%4,i/4);}


                                                                                            Try it online!



                                                                                            Note: This submission modifies the input array.



                                                                                            s() is the function to call with an argument of a mutable int[16] (which is the same in-memory as an int[4][4], which is what g() interprets it as).



                                                                                            s() finds the location of the 16 in the array, then passes this information to g, which is a recursive function that takes a location, sets the number at that location to 0, and then:




                                                                                            • If there is a positive number adjacent to it, recurse with the location of the largest adjacent number


                                                                                            • Else, return the sum of the numbers in the array.







                                                                                            share|improve this answer









                                                                                            $endgroup$













                                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                                              s(int*a){for(i=0;a[i]<16;++i);return g(a,i%4,i/4);}
                                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                                              – RiaD
                                                                                              Nov 24 '18 at 14:37










                                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                                              if g returns sum of eaten you don't need to calculate sum in it. Just return 16*17/2-g() at the end of s
                                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                                              – RiaD
                                                                                              Nov 24 '18 at 14:43










                                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                                              can you use bitwise or instead if logical or?
                                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                                              – RiaD
                                                                                              Nov 24 '18 at 14:45










                                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                                              211 bytes
                                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                                              – ceilingcat
                                                                                              Dec 31 '18 at 18:33














                                                                                            0












                                                                                            0








                                                                                            0





                                                                                            $begingroup$

                                                                                            C (gcc), 250 bytes



                                                                                            x;y;i;b;R;C;
                                                                                            g(int a[4],int X,int Y){b=a[Y][X]=0;for(x=-1;x&lt2;++x)for(y=-1;y<2;++y)if(!(x+X&~3||y+Y&~3||a[y+Y][x+X]<b))b=a[C=Y+y][R=X+x];for(i=x=0;i<16;++i)x+=a[0][i];return b?g(a,R,C):x;}
                                                                                            s(int*a){for(i=0;i<16;++i)if(a[i]==16)return g(a,i%4,i/4);}


                                                                                            Try it online!



                                                                                            Note: This submission modifies the input array.



                                                                                            s() is the function to call with an argument of a mutable int[16] (which is the same in-memory as an int[4][4], which is what g() interprets it as).



                                                                                            s() finds the location of the 16 in the array, then passes this information to g, which is a recursive function that takes a location, sets the number at that location to 0, and then:




                                                                                            • If there is a positive number adjacent to it, recurse with the location of the largest adjacent number


                                                                                            • Else, return the sum of the numbers in the array.







                                                                                            share|improve this answer









                                                                                            $endgroup$



                                                                                            C (gcc), 250 bytes



                                                                                            x;y;i;b;R;C;
                                                                                            g(int a[4],int X,int Y){b=a[Y][X]=0;for(x=-1;x&lt2;++x)for(y=-1;y<2;++y)if(!(x+X&~3||y+Y&~3||a[y+Y][x+X]<b))b=a[C=Y+y][R=X+x];for(i=x=0;i<16;++i)x+=a[0][i];return b?g(a,R,C):x;}
                                                                                            s(int*a){for(i=0;i<16;++i)if(a[i]==16)return g(a,i%4,i/4);}


                                                                                            Try it online!



                                                                                            Note: This submission modifies the input array.



                                                                                            s() is the function to call with an argument of a mutable int[16] (which is the same in-memory as an int[4][4], which is what g() interprets it as).



                                                                                            s() finds the location of the 16 in the array, then passes this information to g, which is a recursive function that takes a location, sets the number at that location to 0, and then:




                                                                                            • If there is a positive number adjacent to it, recurse with the location of the largest adjacent number


                                                                                            • Else, return the sum of the numbers in the array.








                                                                                            share|improve this answer












                                                                                            share|improve this answer



                                                                                            share|improve this answer










                                                                                            answered Nov 24 '18 at 0:23









                                                                                            pizzapants184pizzapants184

                                                                                            2,674716




                                                                                            2,674716












                                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                                              s(int*a){for(i=0;a[i]<16;++i);return g(a,i%4,i/4);}
                                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                                              – RiaD
                                                                                              Nov 24 '18 at 14:37










                                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                                              if g returns sum of eaten you don't need to calculate sum in it. Just return 16*17/2-g() at the end of s
                                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                                              – RiaD
                                                                                              Nov 24 '18 at 14:43










                                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                                              can you use bitwise or instead if logical or?
                                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                                              – RiaD
                                                                                              Nov 24 '18 at 14:45










                                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                                              211 bytes
                                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                                              – ceilingcat
                                                                                              Dec 31 '18 at 18:33


















                                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                                              s(int*a){for(i=0;a[i]<16;++i);return g(a,i%4,i/4);}
                                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                                              – RiaD
                                                                                              Nov 24 '18 at 14:37










                                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                                              if g returns sum of eaten you don't need to calculate sum in it. Just return 16*17/2-g() at the end of s
                                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                                              – RiaD
                                                                                              Nov 24 '18 at 14:43










                                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                                              can you use bitwise or instead if logical or?
                                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                                              – RiaD
                                                                                              Nov 24 '18 at 14:45










                                                                                            • $begingroup$
                                                                                              211 bytes
                                                                                              $endgroup$
                                                                                              – ceilingcat
                                                                                              Dec 31 '18 at 18:33
















                                                                                            $begingroup$
                                                                                            s(int*a){for(i=0;a[i]<16;++i);return g(a,i%4,i/4);}
                                                                                            $endgroup$
                                                                                            – RiaD
                                                                                            Nov 24 '18 at 14:37




                                                                                            $begingroup$
                                                                                            s(int*a){for(i=0;a[i]<16;++i);return g(a,i%4,i/4);}
                                                                                            $endgroup$
                                                                                            – RiaD
                                                                                            Nov 24 '18 at 14:37












                                                                                            $begingroup$
                                                                                            if g returns sum of eaten you don't need to calculate sum in it. Just return 16*17/2-g() at the end of s
                                                                                            $endgroup$
                                                                                            – RiaD
                                                                                            Nov 24 '18 at 14:43




                                                                                            $begingroup$
                                                                                            if g returns sum of eaten you don't need to calculate sum in it. Just return 16*17/2-g() at the end of s
                                                                                            $endgroup$
                                                                                            – RiaD
                                                                                            Nov 24 '18 at 14:43












                                                                                            $begingroup$
                                                                                            can you use bitwise or instead if logical or?
                                                                                            $endgroup$
                                                                                            – RiaD
                                                                                            Nov 24 '18 at 14:45




                                                                                            $begingroup$
                                                                                            can you use bitwise or instead if logical or?
                                                                                            $endgroup$
                                                                                            – RiaD
                                                                                            Nov 24 '18 at 14:45












                                                                                            $begingroup$
                                                                                            211 bytes
                                                                                            $endgroup$
                                                                                            – ceilingcat
                                                                                            Dec 31 '18 at 18:33




                                                                                            $begingroup$
                                                                                            211 bytes
                                                                                            $endgroup$
                                                                                            – ceilingcat
                                                                                            Dec 31 '18 at 18:33


















                                                                                            draft saved

                                                                                            draft discarded




















































                                                                                            If this is an answer to a challenge…




                                                                                            • …Be sure to follow the challenge specification. However, please refrain from exploiting obvious loopholes. Answers abusing any of the standard loopholes are considered invalid. If you think a specification is unclear or underspecified, comment on the question instead.


                                                                                            • …Try to optimize your score. For instance, answers to code-golf challenges should attempt to be as short as possible. You can always include a readable version of the code in addition to the competitive one.
                                                                                              Explanations of your answer make it more interesting to read and are very much encouraged.


                                                                                            • …Include a short header which indicates the language(s) of your code and its score, as defined by the challenge.



                                                                                            More generally…




                                                                                            • …Please make sure to answer the question and provide sufficient detail.


                                                                                            • …Avoid asking for help, clarification or responding to other answers (use comments instead).





                                                                                            draft saved


                                                                                            draft discarded














                                                                                            StackExchange.ready(
                                                                                            function () {
                                                                                            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f176251%2fthe-hungry-mouse%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                                                            }
                                                                                            );

                                                                                            Post as a guest















                                                                                            Required, but never shown





















































                                                                                            Required, but never shown














                                                                                            Required, but never shown












                                                                                            Required, but never shown







                                                                                            Required, but never shown

































                                                                                            Required, but never shown














                                                                                            Required, but never shown












                                                                                            Required, but never shown







                                                                                            Required, but never shown







                                                                                            Popular posts from this blog

                                                                                            鏡平學校

                                                                                            ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

                                                                                            Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?