Connecting oAuth with ASP.Net Identity Invalid Cast












0















I'm trying to build a new Web API on an existing ASP.Net Identity database. I'm following the basic Web API tutorial with creating a new project in VS2017 found on Microsoft's site.



https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/web-api/overview/security/individual-accounts-in-web-api



I would like to implement oAuth with this new Web API; however, when I make a POST to the http://localhost:12345/TOKEN url that contains the username/password of an existing user, the ApplicationUserManager FindAsync method throws an error telling me a type conversion is not valid.



The specified cast from a materialized 'System.Int32' type to the 'System.String' type is not valid.



Here is the POST I'm sending:



$("button").click(function(){
var loginData = {
grant_type: 'password',
username: 'user@somewhere.com',
password: 'password'
};
$.ajax({
type: 'POST',
url: 'http://localhost:12345/Token',
data: loginData
}).done(function (data) {
self.user(data.userName);
// Cache the access token in session storage.
sessionStorage.setItem(tokenKey, data.access_token);
});
});


Here is the C# side



public override async Task GrantResourceOwnerCredentials(OAuthGrantResourceOwnerCredentialsContext context)
{
var userManager = context.OwinContext.GetUserManager<ApplicationUserManager>();

ApplicationUser user = await userManager.FindAsync(context.UserName, context.Password);


//Rest omitted for readability
}


I compared the database tables of AspNetUsers that VS2017 creates to our existing database that I want to use and the AspNetUsers tables match in terms of column names and data types with the exception of the Id column. Our existing DB uses an INT and the one created automatically uses ncvarchar. I'm assuming this is the discrepancy, but I'm not sure why their schemas wouldn't match in the first place.



Is there a way to change the data type the Application User Manager is expecting so it's not looking for that nvarchar?










share|improve this question

























  • Although the problems are different, this post seems to contain the same solution. stackoverflow.com/questions/34505904/…

    – Rafiki
    Nov 20 '18 at 18:54


















0















I'm trying to build a new Web API on an existing ASP.Net Identity database. I'm following the basic Web API tutorial with creating a new project in VS2017 found on Microsoft's site.



https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/web-api/overview/security/individual-accounts-in-web-api



I would like to implement oAuth with this new Web API; however, when I make a POST to the http://localhost:12345/TOKEN url that contains the username/password of an existing user, the ApplicationUserManager FindAsync method throws an error telling me a type conversion is not valid.



The specified cast from a materialized 'System.Int32' type to the 'System.String' type is not valid.



Here is the POST I'm sending:



$("button").click(function(){
var loginData = {
grant_type: 'password',
username: 'user@somewhere.com',
password: 'password'
};
$.ajax({
type: 'POST',
url: 'http://localhost:12345/Token',
data: loginData
}).done(function (data) {
self.user(data.userName);
// Cache the access token in session storage.
sessionStorage.setItem(tokenKey, data.access_token);
});
});


Here is the C# side



public override async Task GrantResourceOwnerCredentials(OAuthGrantResourceOwnerCredentialsContext context)
{
var userManager = context.OwinContext.GetUserManager<ApplicationUserManager>();

ApplicationUser user = await userManager.FindAsync(context.UserName, context.Password);


//Rest omitted for readability
}


I compared the database tables of AspNetUsers that VS2017 creates to our existing database that I want to use and the AspNetUsers tables match in terms of column names and data types with the exception of the Id column. Our existing DB uses an INT and the one created automatically uses ncvarchar. I'm assuming this is the discrepancy, but I'm not sure why their schemas wouldn't match in the first place.



Is there a way to change the data type the Application User Manager is expecting so it's not looking for that nvarchar?










share|improve this question

























  • Although the problems are different, this post seems to contain the same solution. stackoverflow.com/questions/34505904/…

    – Rafiki
    Nov 20 '18 at 18:54
















0












0








0








I'm trying to build a new Web API on an existing ASP.Net Identity database. I'm following the basic Web API tutorial with creating a new project in VS2017 found on Microsoft's site.



https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/web-api/overview/security/individual-accounts-in-web-api



I would like to implement oAuth with this new Web API; however, when I make a POST to the http://localhost:12345/TOKEN url that contains the username/password of an existing user, the ApplicationUserManager FindAsync method throws an error telling me a type conversion is not valid.



The specified cast from a materialized 'System.Int32' type to the 'System.String' type is not valid.



Here is the POST I'm sending:



$("button").click(function(){
var loginData = {
grant_type: 'password',
username: 'user@somewhere.com',
password: 'password'
};
$.ajax({
type: 'POST',
url: 'http://localhost:12345/Token',
data: loginData
}).done(function (data) {
self.user(data.userName);
// Cache the access token in session storage.
sessionStorage.setItem(tokenKey, data.access_token);
});
});


Here is the C# side



public override async Task GrantResourceOwnerCredentials(OAuthGrantResourceOwnerCredentialsContext context)
{
var userManager = context.OwinContext.GetUserManager<ApplicationUserManager>();

ApplicationUser user = await userManager.FindAsync(context.UserName, context.Password);


//Rest omitted for readability
}


I compared the database tables of AspNetUsers that VS2017 creates to our existing database that I want to use and the AspNetUsers tables match in terms of column names and data types with the exception of the Id column. Our existing DB uses an INT and the one created automatically uses ncvarchar. I'm assuming this is the discrepancy, but I'm not sure why their schemas wouldn't match in the first place.



Is there a way to change the data type the Application User Manager is expecting so it's not looking for that nvarchar?










share|improve this question
















I'm trying to build a new Web API on an existing ASP.Net Identity database. I'm following the basic Web API tutorial with creating a new project in VS2017 found on Microsoft's site.



https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/web-api/overview/security/individual-accounts-in-web-api



I would like to implement oAuth with this new Web API; however, when I make a POST to the http://localhost:12345/TOKEN url that contains the username/password of an existing user, the ApplicationUserManager FindAsync method throws an error telling me a type conversion is not valid.



The specified cast from a materialized 'System.Int32' type to the 'System.String' type is not valid.



Here is the POST I'm sending:



$("button").click(function(){
var loginData = {
grant_type: 'password',
username: 'user@somewhere.com',
password: 'password'
};
$.ajax({
type: 'POST',
url: 'http://localhost:12345/Token',
data: loginData
}).done(function (data) {
self.user(data.userName);
// Cache the access token in session storage.
sessionStorage.setItem(tokenKey, data.access_token);
});
});


Here is the C# side



public override async Task GrantResourceOwnerCredentials(OAuthGrantResourceOwnerCredentialsContext context)
{
var userManager = context.OwinContext.GetUserManager<ApplicationUserManager>();

ApplicationUser user = await userManager.FindAsync(context.UserName, context.Password);


//Rest omitted for readability
}


I compared the database tables of AspNetUsers that VS2017 creates to our existing database that I want to use and the AspNetUsers tables match in terms of column names and data types with the exception of the Id column. Our existing DB uses an INT and the one created automatically uses ncvarchar. I'm assuming this is the discrepancy, but I'm not sure why their schemas wouldn't match in the first place.



Is there a way to change the data type the Application User Manager is expecting so it's not looking for that nvarchar?







asp.net-web-api oauth-2.0 asp.net-identity






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 20 '18 at 17:12







Rafiki

















asked Nov 20 '18 at 16:44









RafikiRafiki

3181315




3181315













  • Although the problems are different, this post seems to contain the same solution. stackoverflow.com/questions/34505904/…

    – Rafiki
    Nov 20 '18 at 18:54





















  • Although the problems are different, this post seems to contain the same solution. stackoverflow.com/questions/34505904/…

    – Rafiki
    Nov 20 '18 at 18:54



















Although the problems are different, this post seems to contain the same solution. stackoverflow.com/questions/34505904/…

– Rafiki
Nov 20 '18 at 18:54







Although the problems are different, this post seems to contain the same solution. stackoverflow.com/questions/34505904/…

– Rafiki
Nov 20 '18 at 18:54














0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53397661%2fconnecting-oauth-with-asp-net-identity-invalid-cast%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53397661%2fconnecting-oauth-with-asp-net-identity-invalid-cast%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

鏡平學校

ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?