Executing functions in order












-1















Basically, I'm making a small script to check the IP of some servers based on their hostname, then compare that IP to a list based on the IP block a router is issuing.



The problem I'm having is clearly with the code executing asynchronously, and it's likely been answered a thousand times, but I can't seem to wrap my head around how to fix it. I've tried wrapping everything in promises but I end up breaking everything. Here is the latest attempt to break the steps I need out into individual functions.



const dns = require('dns');
const Table = require('cli-table');
const hosts = ['Server01', 'Server02', 'Server03'];
let list = ;

table = new Table({
head: ['Host', 'Location']
, colWidths: [20, 30]
});

function process() {
hosts.forEach(host => {
dns.lookup(host, function (err, result) {
ipSplit = result.split(".");
r = ipSplit[0] + '.' + ipSplit[1] + '.' + ipSplit[2];
if (r == '10.23.13') {
list.push([host, 'Lab A112']);
}
else {
list.push([host, 'Unknown']);
}
});
});
};

function build () {
table.push(list);
};

function push () {
console.log(table.toString());
};

process();
build();
push();


What piece of the puzzle am I missing here?










share|improve this question























  • Promise.all. Use Promise.all

    – Jared Smith
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:51
















-1















Basically, I'm making a small script to check the IP of some servers based on their hostname, then compare that IP to a list based on the IP block a router is issuing.



The problem I'm having is clearly with the code executing asynchronously, and it's likely been answered a thousand times, but I can't seem to wrap my head around how to fix it. I've tried wrapping everything in promises but I end up breaking everything. Here is the latest attempt to break the steps I need out into individual functions.



const dns = require('dns');
const Table = require('cli-table');
const hosts = ['Server01', 'Server02', 'Server03'];
let list = ;

table = new Table({
head: ['Host', 'Location']
, colWidths: [20, 30]
});

function process() {
hosts.forEach(host => {
dns.lookup(host, function (err, result) {
ipSplit = result.split(".");
r = ipSplit[0] + '.' + ipSplit[1] + '.' + ipSplit[2];
if (r == '10.23.13') {
list.push([host, 'Lab A112']);
}
else {
list.push([host, 'Unknown']);
}
});
});
};

function build () {
table.push(list);
};

function push () {
console.log(table.toString());
};

process();
build();
push();


What piece of the puzzle am I missing here?










share|improve this question























  • Promise.all. Use Promise.all

    – Jared Smith
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:51














-1












-1








-1








Basically, I'm making a small script to check the IP of some servers based on their hostname, then compare that IP to a list based on the IP block a router is issuing.



The problem I'm having is clearly with the code executing asynchronously, and it's likely been answered a thousand times, but I can't seem to wrap my head around how to fix it. I've tried wrapping everything in promises but I end up breaking everything. Here is the latest attempt to break the steps I need out into individual functions.



const dns = require('dns');
const Table = require('cli-table');
const hosts = ['Server01', 'Server02', 'Server03'];
let list = ;

table = new Table({
head: ['Host', 'Location']
, colWidths: [20, 30]
});

function process() {
hosts.forEach(host => {
dns.lookup(host, function (err, result) {
ipSplit = result.split(".");
r = ipSplit[0] + '.' + ipSplit[1] + '.' + ipSplit[2];
if (r == '10.23.13') {
list.push([host, 'Lab A112']);
}
else {
list.push([host, 'Unknown']);
}
});
});
};

function build () {
table.push(list);
};

function push () {
console.log(table.toString());
};

process();
build();
push();


What piece of the puzzle am I missing here?










share|improve this question














Basically, I'm making a small script to check the IP of some servers based on their hostname, then compare that IP to a list based on the IP block a router is issuing.



The problem I'm having is clearly with the code executing asynchronously, and it's likely been answered a thousand times, but I can't seem to wrap my head around how to fix it. I've tried wrapping everything in promises but I end up breaking everything. Here is the latest attempt to break the steps I need out into individual functions.



const dns = require('dns');
const Table = require('cli-table');
const hosts = ['Server01', 'Server02', 'Server03'];
let list = ;

table = new Table({
head: ['Host', 'Location']
, colWidths: [20, 30]
});

function process() {
hosts.forEach(host => {
dns.lookup(host, function (err, result) {
ipSplit = result.split(".");
r = ipSplit[0] + '.' + ipSplit[1] + '.' + ipSplit[2];
if (r == '10.23.13') {
list.push([host, 'Lab A112']);
}
else {
list.push([host, 'Unknown']);
}
});
});
};

function build () {
table.push(list);
};

function push () {
console.log(table.toString());
};

process();
build();
push();


What piece of the puzzle am I missing here?







javascript node.js






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 20 '18 at 16:43









TheMean WonTheMean Won

376




376













  • Promise.all. Use Promise.all

    – Jared Smith
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:51



















  • Promise.all. Use Promise.all

    – Jared Smith
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:51

















Promise.all. Use Promise.all

– Jared Smith
Nov 20 '18 at 16:51





Promise.all. Use Promise.all

– Jared Smith
Nov 20 '18 at 16:51












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0














You'll want to use Promise.all:



const result = Promise.all(hosts.map(host => {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
dns.lookup(host, function (err, result) {
if (err) reject(err);
const ipSplit = result.split(".");
const r = ipSplit[0] + '.' + ipSplit[1] + '.' + ipSplit[2];
if (r === '10.23.13') {
resolve([host, 'Lab A112']);
} else {
resolve([host, 'Unknown']);
}
});
}
}));





share|improve this answer































    0














    You can order your function calls with async/await and you will get the order you need.



    const dns = require('dns');
    const Table = require('cli-table');
    const hosts = ['Server01', 'Server02', 'Server03'];
    let list = ;

    table = new Table({
    head: ['Host', 'Location']
    , colWidths: [20, 30]
    });

    function process() {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    hosts.forEach(host => {
    dns.lookup(host, function (err, result) {
    ipSplit = result.split(".");
    r = ipSplit[0] + '.' + ipSplit[1] + '.' + ipSplit[2];
    if (r == '10.23.13') {
    resolve(list.push([host, 'Lab A112']));
    }
    else {
    reject(list.push([host, 'Unknown']));
    }
    });
    });
    })
    };

    function build () {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject)=>{
    resolve(table.push(list);)
    })

    };

    function push () {
    console.log(table.toString());
    };
    async function waitForFunctions() {
    try{
    const resOne = await process();
    const resTwo = await build()
    } catch(error){
    console.log(error);
    }
    return Promise.all([resOne, resTwo])
    }
    waitForFunctions()
    .then((values)=>{
    console.log(values);
    console.log(push());
    });





    share|improve this answer
























    • A little over complicated. the build function is synchronous by nature. You've crafted a answer to support a solution rather than a solution to support the question.

      – Randy Casburn
      Nov 20 '18 at 17:12











    • @RandyCasburn This is just how I interpret the problem and how I would have solved it. Yes, build is sync, but I need to make sure that it is not called before process function has finished, so I turn it into promise.

      – squeekyDave
      Nov 20 '18 at 17:15











    • Fair enough. But that is already ensured with `process().then(()=>{build();push()}); This is much, much simpler and easier to comprehend.

      – Randy Casburn
      Nov 20 '18 at 17:18











    • @RandyCasburn the process function does not return anything from the original example, but yeas, there is definetally a shorter way to achieve the same thing, just async/awit for me is the simpler thing, but thats just me.

      – squeekyDave
      Nov 20 '18 at 17:22






    • 1





      I meant you still need your promise returned from process() for sure. Didn't mean to be obscure. All good. Get your intent.

      – Randy Casburn
      Nov 20 '18 at 17:24











    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53397647%2fexecuting-functions-in-order%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    You'll want to use Promise.all:



    const result = Promise.all(hosts.map(host => {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    dns.lookup(host, function (err, result) {
    if (err) reject(err);
    const ipSplit = result.split(".");
    const r = ipSplit[0] + '.' + ipSplit[1] + '.' + ipSplit[2];
    if (r === '10.23.13') {
    resolve([host, 'Lab A112']);
    } else {
    resolve([host, 'Unknown']);
    }
    });
    }
    }));





    share|improve this answer




























      0














      You'll want to use Promise.all:



      const result = Promise.all(hosts.map(host => {
      return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
      dns.lookup(host, function (err, result) {
      if (err) reject(err);
      const ipSplit = result.split(".");
      const r = ipSplit[0] + '.' + ipSplit[1] + '.' + ipSplit[2];
      if (r === '10.23.13') {
      resolve([host, 'Lab A112']);
      } else {
      resolve([host, 'Unknown']);
      }
      });
      }
      }));





      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        You'll want to use Promise.all:



        const result = Promise.all(hosts.map(host => {
        return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
        dns.lookup(host, function (err, result) {
        if (err) reject(err);
        const ipSplit = result.split(".");
        const r = ipSplit[0] + '.' + ipSplit[1] + '.' + ipSplit[2];
        if (r === '10.23.13') {
        resolve([host, 'Lab A112']);
        } else {
        resolve([host, 'Unknown']);
        }
        });
        }
        }));





        share|improve this answer













        You'll want to use Promise.all:



        const result = Promise.all(hosts.map(host => {
        return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
        dns.lookup(host, function (err, result) {
        if (err) reject(err);
        const ipSplit = result.split(".");
        const r = ipSplit[0] + '.' + ipSplit[1] + '.' + ipSplit[2];
        if (r === '10.23.13') {
        resolve([host, 'Lab A112']);
        } else {
        resolve([host, 'Unknown']);
        }
        });
        }
        }));






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 20 '18 at 16:53









        Jared SmithJared Smith

        9,78032043




        9,78032043

























            0














            You can order your function calls with async/await and you will get the order you need.



            const dns = require('dns');
            const Table = require('cli-table');
            const hosts = ['Server01', 'Server02', 'Server03'];
            let list = ;

            table = new Table({
            head: ['Host', 'Location']
            , colWidths: [20, 30]
            });

            function process() {
            return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
            hosts.forEach(host => {
            dns.lookup(host, function (err, result) {
            ipSplit = result.split(".");
            r = ipSplit[0] + '.' + ipSplit[1] + '.' + ipSplit[2];
            if (r == '10.23.13') {
            resolve(list.push([host, 'Lab A112']));
            }
            else {
            reject(list.push([host, 'Unknown']));
            }
            });
            });
            })
            };

            function build () {
            return new Promise((resolve, reject)=>{
            resolve(table.push(list);)
            })

            };

            function push () {
            console.log(table.toString());
            };
            async function waitForFunctions() {
            try{
            const resOne = await process();
            const resTwo = await build()
            } catch(error){
            console.log(error);
            }
            return Promise.all([resOne, resTwo])
            }
            waitForFunctions()
            .then((values)=>{
            console.log(values);
            console.log(push());
            });





            share|improve this answer
























            • A little over complicated. the build function is synchronous by nature. You've crafted a answer to support a solution rather than a solution to support the question.

              – Randy Casburn
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:12











            • @RandyCasburn This is just how I interpret the problem and how I would have solved it. Yes, build is sync, but I need to make sure that it is not called before process function has finished, so I turn it into promise.

              – squeekyDave
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:15











            • Fair enough. But that is already ensured with `process().then(()=>{build();push()}); This is much, much simpler and easier to comprehend.

              – Randy Casburn
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:18











            • @RandyCasburn the process function does not return anything from the original example, but yeas, there is definetally a shorter way to achieve the same thing, just async/awit for me is the simpler thing, but thats just me.

              – squeekyDave
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:22






            • 1





              I meant you still need your promise returned from process() for sure. Didn't mean to be obscure. All good. Get your intent.

              – Randy Casburn
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:24
















            0














            You can order your function calls with async/await and you will get the order you need.



            const dns = require('dns');
            const Table = require('cli-table');
            const hosts = ['Server01', 'Server02', 'Server03'];
            let list = ;

            table = new Table({
            head: ['Host', 'Location']
            , colWidths: [20, 30]
            });

            function process() {
            return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
            hosts.forEach(host => {
            dns.lookup(host, function (err, result) {
            ipSplit = result.split(".");
            r = ipSplit[0] + '.' + ipSplit[1] + '.' + ipSplit[2];
            if (r == '10.23.13') {
            resolve(list.push([host, 'Lab A112']));
            }
            else {
            reject(list.push([host, 'Unknown']));
            }
            });
            });
            })
            };

            function build () {
            return new Promise((resolve, reject)=>{
            resolve(table.push(list);)
            })

            };

            function push () {
            console.log(table.toString());
            };
            async function waitForFunctions() {
            try{
            const resOne = await process();
            const resTwo = await build()
            } catch(error){
            console.log(error);
            }
            return Promise.all([resOne, resTwo])
            }
            waitForFunctions()
            .then((values)=>{
            console.log(values);
            console.log(push());
            });





            share|improve this answer
























            • A little over complicated. the build function is synchronous by nature. You've crafted a answer to support a solution rather than a solution to support the question.

              – Randy Casburn
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:12











            • @RandyCasburn This is just how I interpret the problem and how I would have solved it. Yes, build is sync, but I need to make sure that it is not called before process function has finished, so I turn it into promise.

              – squeekyDave
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:15











            • Fair enough. But that is already ensured with `process().then(()=>{build();push()}); This is much, much simpler and easier to comprehend.

              – Randy Casburn
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:18











            • @RandyCasburn the process function does not return anything from the original example, but yeas, there is definetally a shorter way to achieve the same thing, just async/awit for me is the simpler thing, but thats just me.

              – squeekyDave
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:22






            • 1





              I meant you still need your promise returned from process() for sure. Didn't mean to be obscure. All good. Get your intent.

              – Randy Casburn
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:24














            0












            0








            0







            You can order your function calls with async/await and you will get the order you need.



            const dns = require('dns');
            const Table = require('cli-table');
            const hosts = ['Server01', 'Server02', 'Server03'];
            let list = ;

            table = new Table({
            head: ['Host', 'Location']
            , colWidths: [20, 30]
            });

            function process() {
            return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
            hosts.forEach(host => {
            dns.lookup(host, function (err, result) {
            ipSplit = result.split(".");
            r = ipSplit[0] + '.' + ipSplit[1] + '.' + ipSplit[2];
            if (r == '10.23.13') {
            resolve(list.push([host, 'Lab A112']));
            }
            else {
            reject(list.push([host, 'Unknown']));
            }
            });
            });
            })
            };

            function build () {
            return new Promise((resolve, reject)=>{
            resolve(table.push(list);)
            })

            };

            function push () {
            console.log(table.toString());
            };
            async function waitForFunctions() {
            try{
            const resOne = await process();
            const resTwo = await build()
            } catch(error){
            console.log(error);
            }
            return Promise.all([resOne, resTwo])
            }
            waitForFunctions()
            .then((values)=>{
            console.log(values);
            console.log(push());
            });





            share|improve this answer













            You can order your function calls with async/await and you will get the order you need.



            const dns = require('dns');
            const Table = require('cli-table');
            const hosts = ['Server01', 'Server02', 'Server03'];
            let list = ;

            table = new Table({
            head: ['Host', 'Location']
            , colWidths: [20, 30]
            });

            function process() {
            return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
            hosts.forEach(host => {
            dns.lookup(host, function (err, result) {
            ipSplit = result.split(".");
            r = ipSplit[0] + '.' + ipSplit[1] + '.' + ipSplit[2];
            if (r == '10.23.13') {
            resolve(list.push([host, 'Lab A112']));
            }
            else {
            reject(list.push([host, 'Unknown']));
            }
            });
            });
            })
            };

            function build () {
            return new Promise((resolve, reject)=>{
            resolve(table.push(list);)
            })

            };

            function push () {
            console.log(table.toString());
            };
            async function waitForFunctions() {
            try{
            const resOne = await process();
            const resTwo = await build()
            } catch(error){
            console.log(error);
            }
            return Promise.all([resOne, resTwo])
            }
            waitForFunctions()
            .then((values)=>{
            console.log(values);
            console.log(push());
            });






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Nov 20 '18 at 17:05









            squeekyDavesqueekyDave

            455216




            455216













            • A little over complicated. the build function is synchronous by nature. You've crafted a answer to support a solution rather than a solution to support the question.

              – Randy Casburn
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:12











            • @RandyCasburn This is just how I interpret the problem and how I would have solved it. Yes, build is sync, but I need to make sure that it is not called before process function has finished, so I turn it into promise.

              – squeekyDave
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:15











            • Fair enough. But that is already ensured with `process().then(()=>{build();push()}); This is much, much simpler and easier to comprehend.

              – Randy Casburn
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:18











            • @RandyCasburn the process function does not return anything from the original example, but yeas, there is definetally a shorter way to achieve the same thing, just async/awit for me is the simpler thing, but thats just me.

              – squeekyDave
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:22






            • 1





              I meant you still need your promise returned from process() for sure. Didn't mean to be obscure. All good. Get your intent.

              – Randy Casburn
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:24



















            • A little over complicated. the build function is synchronous by nature. You've crafted a answer to support a solution rather than a solution to support the question.

              – Randy Casburn
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:12











            • @RandyCasburn This is just how I interpret the problem and how I would have solved it. Yes, build is sync, but I need to make sure that it is not called before process function has finished, so I turn it into promise.

              – squeekyDave
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:15











            • Fair enough. But that is already ensured with `process().then(()=>{build();push()}); This is much, much simpler and easier to comprehend.

              – Randy Casburn
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:18











            • @RandyCasburn the process function does not return anything from the original example, but yeas, there is definetally a shorter way to achieve the same thing, just async/awit for me is the simpler thing, but thats just me.

              – squeekyDave
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:22






            • 1





              I meant you still need your promise returned from process() for sure. Didn't mean to be obscure. All good. Get your intent.

              – Randy Casburn
              Nov 20 '18 at 17:24

















            A little over complicated. the build function is synchronous by nature. You've crafted a answer to support a solution rather than a solution to support the question.

            – Randy Casburn
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:12





            A little over complicated. the build function is synchronous by nature. You've crafted a answer to support a solution rather than a solution to support the question.

            – Randy Casburn
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:12













            @RandyCasburn This is just how I interpret the problem and how I would have solved it. Yes, build is sync, but I need to make sure that it is not called before process function has finished, so I turn it into promise.

            – squeekyDave
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:15





            @RandyCasburn This is just how I interpret the problem and how I would have solved it. Yes, build is sync, but I need to make sure that it is not called before process function has finished, so I turn it into promise.

            – squeekyDave
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:15













            Fair enough. But that is already ensured with `process().then(()=>{build();push()}); This is much, much simpler and easier to comprehend.

            – Randy Casburn
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:18





            Fair enough. But that is already ensured with `process().then(()=>{build();push()}); This is much, much simpler and easier to comprehend.

            – Randy Casburn
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:18













            @RandyCasburn the process function does not return anything from the original example, but yeas, there is definetally a shorter way to achieve the same thing, just async/awit for me is the simpler thing, but thats just me.

            – squeekyDave
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:22





            @RandyCasburn the process function does not return anything from the original example, but yeas, there is definetally a shorter way to achieve the same thing, just async/awit for me is the simpler thing, but thats just me.

            – squeekyDave
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:22




            1




            1





            I meant you still need your promise returned from process() for sure. Didn't mean to be obscure. All good. Get your intent.

            – Randy Casburn
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:24





            I meant you still need your promise returned from process() for sure. Didn't mean to be obscure. All good. Get your intent.

            – Randy Casburn
            Nov 20 '18 at 17:24


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53397647%2fexecuting-functions-in-order%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            鏡平學校

            ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

            Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?