Most efficient way of printing different types (from the same array?)












0















I have a small sketch that reads a wide variety of sensors, which all come down to either an integer or boolean value.



Every loop I want to print them as following:




"variableName; variableValue"
(which would give for example "distanceSenso; 432")




Currently this looks like



 int flame, distance, <etc>
bool flame, touch;
void loop(){
noise = analogRead(SOUND_SENSOR);
distance = analogRead(DISTANCE_SENSOR);
..etc..
Serial.print("flame;");
Serial.println(flame);
Serial.print("distance;");
Serial.println(dist);
Serial.print("motion;");
Serial.println(motion);
Serial.print("touch;");
Serial.println(touch);
Serial.print("noise;");
Serial.println(noise);
<etc for many more sensors>
}


This works fine but isn't efficient. I would like to add each variable to an array and simply update the value each loop. This would allow be to use a simple for loop that prints each array element in a Serial.println.



However, this isn't possible as I'm using both int and bool variables. I could make two separate arrays or forget about the for loop and keep my current approach, but I'm learning to code and would like to know what the most efficient way would be to do this.



So, my question: how could I print each variable in said syntax in the most efficient possible way?










share|improve this question

























  • isn't efficient. This is the most efficient method, you can only get slower.

    – Kamil Cuk
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:17











  • Does the order of the output matter? Is it okay to output 0 for false and 1 for true for bool sensors?

    – Nominal Animal
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:17






  • 1





    "This isn't possible as I'm using both int and bool variables." -- bool is an integer type that can be stored in an integer array. What is the problem; do you need to store the value as a bool? Do you need to print the value as "true" or "false" for bool values? More detail needed, and the question needs narrowing with "most efficient possible way". Most efficient in what way? Speed of execution? Lines of code? Memory usage?

    – David Bowling
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:17






  • 2





    What isn't efficient? Even a slowpoke AVR executes thousands of times faster than the RS-232. The real bottleneck here is the blocking Ardunio API. If it's too slow for your purposes, then maybe pick a MCU from this millennium, maybe even one with DMA, then write the code yourself.

    – Lundin
    Nov 21 '18 at 15:01
















0















I have a small sketch that reads a wide variety of sensors, which all come down to either an integer or boolean value.



Every loop I want to print them as following:




"variableName; variableValue"
(which would give for example "distanceSenso; 432")




Currently this looks like



 int flame, distance, <etc>
bool flame, touch;
void loop(){
noise = analogRead(SOUND_SENSOR);
distance = analogRead(DISTANCE_SENSOR);
..etc..
Serial.print("flame;");
Serial.println(flame);
Serial.print("distance;");
Serial.println(dist);
Serial.print("motion;");
Serial.println(motion);
Serial.print("touch;");
Serial.println(touch);
Serial.print("noise;");
Serial.println(noise);
<etc for many more sensors>
}


This works fine but isn't efficient. I would like to add each variable to an array and simply update the value each loop. This would allow be to use a simple for loop that prints each array element in a Serial.println.



However, this isn't possible as I'm using both int and bool variables. I could make two separate arrays or forget about the for loop and keep my current approach, but I'm learning to code and would like to know what the most efficient way would be to do this.



So, my question: how could I print each variable in said syntax in the most efficient possible way?










share|improve this question

























  • isn't efficient. This is the most efficient method, you can only get slower.

    – Kamil Cuk
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:17











  • Does the order of the output matter? Is it okay to output 0 for false and 1 for true for bool sensors?

    – Nominal Animal
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:17






  • 1





    "This isn't possible as I'm using both int and bool variables." -- bool is an integer type that can be stored in an integer array. What is the problem; do you need to store the value as a bool? Do you need to print the value as "true" or "false" for bool values? More detail needed, and the question needs narrowing with "most efficient possible way". Most efficient in what way? Speed of execution? Lines of code? Memory usage?

    – David Bowling
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:17






  • 2





    What isn't efficient? Even a slowpoke AVR executes thousands of times faster than the RS-232. The real bottleneck here is the blocking Ardunio API. If it's too slow for your purposes, then maybe pick a MCU from this millennium, maybe even one with DMA, then write the code yourself.

    – Lundin
    Nov 21 '18 at 15:01














0












0








0








I have a small sketch that reads a wide variety of sensors, which all come down to either an integer or boolean value.



Every loop I want to print them as following:




"variableName; variableValue"
(which would give for example "distanceSenso; 432")




Currently this looks like



 int flame, distance, <etc>
bool flame, touch;
void loop(){
noise = analogRead(SOUND_SENSOR);
distance = analogRead(DISTANCE_SENSOR);
..etc..
Serial.print("flame;");
Serial.println(flame);
Serial.print("distance;");
Serial.println(dist);
Serial.print("motion;");
Serial.println(motion);
Serial.print("touch;");
Serial.println(touch);
Serial.print("noise;");
Serial.println(noise);
<etc for many more sensors>
}


This works fine but isn't efficient. I would like to add each variable to an array and simply update the value each loop. This would allow be to use a simple for loop that prints each array element in a Serial.println.



However, this isn't possible as I'm using both int and bool variables. I could make two separate arrays or forget about the for loop and keep my current approach, but I'm learning to code and would like to know what the most efficient way would be to do this.



So, my question: how could I print each variable in said syntax in the most efficient possible way?










share|improve this question
















I have a small sketch that reads a wide variety of sensors, which all come down to either an integer or boolean value.



Every loop I want to print them as following:




"variableName; variableValue"
(which would give for example "distanceSenso; 432")




Currently this looks like



 int flame, distance, <etc>
bool flame, touch;
void loop(){
noise = analogRead(SOUND_SENSOR);
distance = analogRead(DISTANCE_SENSOR);
..etc..
Serial.print("flame;");
Serial.println(flame);
Serial.print("distance;");
Serial.println(dist);
Serial.print("motion;");
Serial.println(motion);
Serial.print("touch;");
Serial.println(touch);
Serial.print("noise;");
Serial.println(noise);
<etc for many more sensors>
}


This works fine but isn't efficient. I would like to add each variable to an array and simply update the value each loop. This would allow be to use a simple for loop that prints each array element in a Serial.println.



However, this isn't possible as I'm using both int and bool variables. I could make two separate arrays or forget about the for loop and keep my current approach, but I'm learning to code and would like to know what the most efficient way would be to do this.



So, my question: how could I print each variable in said syntax in the most efficient possible way?







c++ arduino






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 21 '18 at 15:25









gre_gor

4,28092732




4,28092732










asked Nov 21 '18 at 13:27









user3287470user3287470

207




207













  • isn't efficient. This is the most efficient method, you can only get slower.

    – Kamil Cuk
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:17











  • Does the order of the output matter? Is it okay to output 0 for false and 1 for true for bool sensors?

    – Nominal Animal
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:17






  • 1





    "This isn't possible as I'm using both int and bool variables." -- bool is an integer type that can be stored in an integer array. What is the problem; do you need to store the value as a bool? Do you need to print the value as "true" or "false" for bool values? More detail needed, and the question needs narrowing with "most efficient possible way". Most efficient in what way? Speed of execution? Lines of code? Memory usage?

    – David Bowling
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:17






  • 2





    What isn't efficient? Even a slowpoke AVR executes thousands of times faster than the RS-232. The real bottleneck here is the blocking Ardunio API. If it's too slow for your purposes, then maybe pick a MCU from this millennium, maybe even one with DMA, then write the code yourself.

    – Lundin
    Nov 21 '18 at 15:01



















  • isn't efficient. This is the most efficient method, you can only get slower.

    – Kamil Cuk
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:17











  • Does the order of the output matter? Is it okay to output 0 for false and 1 for true for bool sensors?

    – Nominal Animal
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:17






  • 1





    "This isn't possible as I'm using both int and bool variables." -- bool is an integer type that can be stored in an integer array. What is the problem; do you need to store the value as a bool? Do you need to print the value as "true" or "false" for bool values? More detail needed, and the question needs narrowing with "most efficient possible way". Most efficient in what way? Speed of execution? Lines of code? Memory usage?

    – David Bowling
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:17






  • 2





    What isn't efficient? Even a slowpoke AVR executes thousands of times faster than the RS-232. The real bottleneck here is the blocking Ardunio API. If it's too slow for your purposes, then maybe pick a MCU from this millennium, maybe even one with DMA, then write the code yourself.

    – Lundin
    Nov 21 '18 at 15:01

















isn't efficient. This is the most efficient method, you can only get slower.

– Kamil Cuk
Nov 21 '18 at 14:17





isn't efficient. This is the most efficient method, you can only get slower.

– Kamil Cuk
Nov 21 '18 at 14:17













Does the order of the output matter? Is it okay to output 0 for false and 1 for true for bool sensors?

– Nominal Animal
Nov 21 '18 at 14:17





Does the order of the output matter? Is it okay to output 0 for false and 1 for true for bool sensors?

– Nominal Animal
Nov 21 '18 at 14:17




1




1





"This isn't possible as I'm using both int and bool variables." -- bool is an integer type that can be stored in an integer array. What is the problem; do you need to store the value as a bool? Do you need to print the value as "true" or "false" for bool values? More detail needed, and the question needs narrowing with "most efficient possible way". Most efficient in what way? Speed of execution? Lines of code? Memory usage?

– David Bowling
Nov 21 '18 at 14:17





"This isn't possible as I'm using both int and bool variables." -- bool is an integer type that can be stored in an integer array. What is the problem; do you need to store the value as a bool? Do you need to print the value as "true" or "false" for bool values? More detail needed, and the question needs narrowing with "most efficient possible way". Most efficient in what way? Speed of execution? Lines of code? Memory usage?

– David Bowling
Nov 21 '18 at 14:17




2




2





What isn't efficient? Even a slowpoke AVR executes thousands of times faster than the RS-232. The real bottleneck here is the blocking Ardunio API. If it's too slow for your purposes, then maybe pick a MCU from this millennium, maybe even one with DMA, then write the code yourself.

– Lundin
Nov 21 '18 at 15:01





What isn't efficient? Even a slowpoke AVR executes thousands of times faster than the RS-232. The real bottleneck here is the blocking Ardunio API. If it's too slow for your purposes, then maybe pick a MCU from this millennium, maybe even one with DMA, then write the code yourself.

– Lundin
Nov 21 '18 at 15:01












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














Sequential constructs in code are often the most efficient in terms of speed. If you are looking for improvements in readability (eg, how many lines of code) then looping will help, but likely reduce efficiency in other ways. That said, to reduce number of lines, say in a loop...



Use a combination of enum, const char array and struct. (struct is optional here, but something I often use for readability when working with a large number of members)



I do not have your environment, but for illustration using ANSI C, the following shows how enumerated values can tie string descriptions together with measurement values into the same struct instance, allowing results to be reported in a loop:



enum {
FLAME_SENSOR, // enumerated from 0 to max_sensor
DISTANCE_SENSOR,
MOTION_SENSOR,
TOUCH_SENSOR,
SOUND_SENSOR,
// add more sensors???
MAX_SENSOR
};

typedef struct { // optional struct
int val;
char descr[20];
}PARAM;

const char str[MAX_SENSOR][20] = {"flame","distance","motion","touch","noise"};

//simulation prototype
int analogRead(int type);

int main(void)
{
int i;
PARAM p;
char buf[20];
int result = 0;

for(i=0;i<MAX_SENSOR;i++)
{
p.val = analogRead(i);// for use with struct
result = analogRead(i);//for use without struct
if(p.val /*(or result)*/ == some error)
{
//handle error
}
strcpy(p.descr, str[i]);//for use without struct
sprintf(buf, "%s: %dn", p.descr, p.val);//for use with struct
sprintf(buf, "%s: %dn", str[i], result);//for use without struct
printf(buf);
sleep(10); //10ms delay, For simulation only, to allow clock tick for rand() function
}
return 0;
}

//simple simulation of analog read function
int analogRead(int type)
{
int meas = 0;
srand(clock());
switch(type) {
case FLAME_SENSOR:
// meas = read flame sensor instrument
meas = rand()%10;
break;
case DISTANCE_SENSOR:
// meas = read dist sensor instrument
meas = rand()%10;
break;
case MOTION_SENSOR:
// meas = read motion sensor instrument
meas = rand()%10;
break;
case TOUCH_SENSOR:
// meas = read touch sensor instrument
meas = rand()%10;
break;
case SOUND_SENSOR:
// meas = read sound sensor instrument
meas = rand()%10;
break;
// add more case statements ???
default:
meas = some error
break;
}
return meas;
}





share|improve this answer


























  • why strcpy(p.descr, str[i]); printf("%s"... p.descr) when you can just sprintf("%s" str[i]) ?

    – Kamil Cuk
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:16











  • @KamilCuk - Ummm. I don't know. Good catch :) (i'll fix that) Thanks.

    – ryyker
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:18



















2














From arduino reference:



> analogRead()
>
> Returns
> int(0 to 1023)


So you are getting integers anyway.



Usually I create a temporary structure will all the different data and context I need to iterate through. Then a simple loop is sufficient.



struct data_s {
const char *desc;
int pin;
enum data_type_s {
DATA_INT,
DATA_BOOL,
} data_type;
} const datas = {
{ SOUND_SENSOR, "sound", DATA_INT },
{ DISTANCE_SENSOR, "distance", DATA_INT },
{ SOMEBOOLEAN_SENSOR, "someboolean", DATA_BOOL },
... and so on ...
};

for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(datas)/sizeof(*datas); ++i) {
Serial.print(data[i].desc);
Serial.print(";");
const int readed_value = analogRead(data[i].pin);
switch (data[i].type) {
case DATA_BOOL:
// custom int->bool conversion
Serial.print(value ? "true" : "false");
break;
case DATA_INT:
Serial.print(value);
break;
}
Serial.print("n");
}





share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53413090%2fmost-efficient-way-of-printing-different-types-from-the-same-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    Sequential constructs in code are often the most efficient in terms of speed. If you are looking for improvements in readability (eg, how many lines of code) then looping will help, but likely reduce efficiency in other ways. That said, to reduce number of lines, say in a loop...



    Use a combination of enum, const char array and struct. (struct is optional here, but something I often use for readability when working with a large number of members)



    I do not have your environment, but for illustration using ANSI C, the following shows how enumerated values can tie string descriptions together with measurement values into the same struct instance, allowing results to be reported in a loop:



    enum {
    FLAME_SENSOR, // enumerated from 0 to max_sensor
    DISTANCE_SENSOR,
    MOTION_SENSOR,
    TOUCH_SENSOR,
    SOUND_SENSOR,
    // add more sensors???
    MAX_SENSOR
    };

    typedef struct { // optional struct
    int val;
    char descr[20];
    }PARAM;

    const char str[MAX_SENSOR][20] = {"flame","distance","motion","touch","noise"};

    //simulation prototype
    int analogRead(int type);

    int main(void)
    {
    int i;
    PARAM p;
    char buf[20];
    int result = 0;

    for(i=0;i<MAX_SENSOR;i++)
    {
    p.val = analogRead(i);// for use with struct
    result = analogRead(i);//for use without struct
    if(p.val /*(or result)*/ == some error)
    {
    //handle error
    }
    strcpy(p.descr, str[i]);//for use without struct
    sprintf(buf, "%s: %dn", p.descr, p.val);//for use with struct
    sprintf(buf, "%s: %dn", str[i], result);//for use without struct
    printf(buf);
    sleep(10); //10ms delay, For simulation only, to allow clock tick for rand() function
    }
    return 0;
    }

    //simple simulation of analog read function
    int analogRead(int type)
    {
    int meas = 0;
    srand(clock());
    switch(type) {
    case FLAME_SENSOR:
    // meas = read flame sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    case DISTANCE_SENSOR:
    // meas = read dist sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    case MOTION_SENSOR:
    // meas = read motion sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    case TOUCH_SENSOR:
    // meas = read touch sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    case SOUND_SENSOR:
    // meas = read sound sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    // add more case statements ???
    default:
    meas = some error
    break;
    }
    return meas;
    }





    share|improve this answer


























    • why strcpy(p.descr, str[i]); printf("%s"... p.descr) when you can just sprintf("%s" str[i]) ?

      – Kamil Cuk
      Nov 21 '18 at 14:16











    • @KamilCuk - Ummm. I don't know. Good catch :) (i'll fix that) Thanks.

      – ryyker
      Nov 21 '18 at 14:18
















    3














    Sequential constructs in code are often the most efficient in terms of speed. If you are looking for improvements in readability (eg, how many lines of code) then looping will help, but likely reduce efficiency in other ways. That said, to reduce number of lines, say in a loop...



    Use a combination of enum, const char array and struct. (struct is optional here, but something I often use for readability when working with a large number of members)



    I do not have your environment, but for illustration using ANSI C, the following shows how enumerated values can tie string descriptions together with measurement values into the same struct instance, allowing results to be reported in a loop:



    enum {
    FLAME_SENSOR, // enumerated from 0 to max_sensor
    DISTANCE_SENSOR,
    MOTION_SENSOR,
    TOUCH_SENSOR,
    SOUND_SENSOR,
    // add more sensors???
    MAX_SENSOR
    };

    typedef struct { // optional struct
    int val;
    char descr[20];
    }PARAM;

    const char str[MAX_SENSOR][20] = {"flame","distance","motion","touch","noise"};

    //simulation prototype
    int analogRead(int type);

    int main(void)
    {
    int i;
    PARAM p;
    char buf[20];
    int result = 0;

    for(i=0;i<MAX_SENSOR;i++)
    {
    p.val = analogRead(i);// for use with struct
    result = analogRead(i);//for use without struct
    if(p.val /*(or result)*/ == some error)
    {
    //handle error
    }
    strcpy(p.descr, str[i]);//for use without struct
    sprintf(buf, "%s: %dn", p.descr, p.val);//for use with struct
    sprintf(buf, "%s: %dn", str[i], result);//for use without struct
    printf(buf);
    sleep(10); //10ms delay, For simulation only, to allow clock tick for rand() function
    }
    return 0;
    }

    //simple simulation of analog read function
    int analogRead(int type)
    {
    int meas = 0;
    srand(clock());
    switch(type) {
    case FLAME_SENSOR:
    // meas = read flame sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    case DISTANCE_SENSOR:
    // meas = read dist sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    case MOTION_SENSOR:
    // meas = read motion sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    case TOUCH_SENSOR:
    // meas = read touch sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    case SOUND_SENSOR:
    // meas = read sound sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    // add more case statements ???
    default:
    meas = some error
    break;
    }
    return meas;
    }





    share|improve this answer


























    • why strcpy(p.descr, str[i]); printf("%s"... p.descr) when you can just sprintf("%s" str[i]) ?

      – Kamil Cuk
      Nov 21 '18 at 14:16











    • @KamilCuk - Ummm. I don't know. Good catch :) (i'll fix that) Thanks.

      – ryyker
      Nov 21 '18 at 14:18














    3












    3








    3







    Sequential constructs in code are often the most efficient in terms of speed. If you are looking for improvements in readability (eg, how many lines of code) then looping will help, but likely reduce efficiency in other ways. That said, to reduce number of lines, say in a loop...



    Use a combination of enum, const char array and struct. (struct is optional here, but something I often use for readability when working with a large number of members)



    I do not have your environment, but for illustration using ANSI C, the following shows how enumerated values can tie string descriptions together with measurement values into the same struct instance, allowing results to be reported in a loop:



    enum {
    FLAME_SENSOR, // enumerated from 0 to max_sensor
    DISTANCE_SENSOR,
    MOTION_SENSOR,
    TOUCH_SENSOR,
    SOUND_SENSOR,
    // add more sensors???
    MAX_SENSOR
    };

    typedef struct { // optional struct
    int val;
    char descr[20];
    }PARAM;

    const char str[MAX_SENSOR][20] = {"flame","distance","motion","touch","noise"};

    //simulation prototype
    int analogRead(int type);

    int main(void)
    {
    int i;
    PARAM p;
    char buf[20];
    int result = 0;

    for(i=0;i<MAX_SENSOR;i++)
    {
    p.val = analogRead(i);// for use with struct
    result = analogRead(i);//for use without struct
    if(p.val /*(or result)*/ == some error)
    {
    //handle error
    }
    strcpy(p.descr, str[i]);//for use without struct
    sprintf(buf, "%s: %dn", p.descr, p.val);//for use with struct
    sprintf(buf, "%s: %dn", str[i], result);//for use without struct
    printf(buf);
    sleep(10); //10ms delay, For simulation only, to allow clock tick for rand() function
    }
    return 0;
    }

    //simple simulation of analog read function
    int analogRead(int type)
    {
    int meas = 0;
    srand(clock());
    switch(type) {
    case FLAME_SENSOR:
    // meas = read flame sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    case DISTANCE_SENSOR:
    // meas = read dist sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    case MOTION_SENSOR:
    // meas = read motion sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    case TOUCH_SENSOR:
    // meas = read touch sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    case SOUND_SENSOR:
    // meas = read sound sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    // add more case statements ???
    default:
    meas = some error
    break;
    }
    return meas;
    }





    share|improve this answer















    Sequential constructs in code are often the most efficient in terms of speed. If you are looking for improvements in readability (eg, how many lines of code) then looping will help, but likely reduce efficiency in other ways. That said, to reduce number of lines, say in a loop...



    Use a combination of enum, const char array and struct. (struct is optional here, but something I often use for readability when working with a large number of members)



    I do not have your environment, but for illustration using ANSI C, the following shows how enumerated values can tie string descriptions together with measurement values into the same struct instance, allowing results to be reported in a loop:



    enum {
    FLAME_SENSOR, // enumerated from 0 to max_sensor
    DISTANCE_SENSOR,
    MOTION_SENSOR,
    TOUCH_SENSOR,
    SOUND_SENSOR,
    // add more sensors???
    MAX_SENSOR
    };

    typedef struct { // optional struct
    int val;
    char descr[20];
    }PARAM;

    const char str[MAX_SENSOR][20] = {"flame","distance","motion","touch","noise"};

    //simulation prototype
    int analogRead(int type);

    int main(void)
    {
    int i;
    PARAM p;
    char buf[20];
    int result = 0;

    for(i=0;i<MAX_SENSOR;i++)
    {
    p.val = analogRead(i);// for use with struct
    result = analogRead(i);//for use without struct
    if(p.val /*(or result)*/ == some error)
    {
    //handle error
    }
    strcpy(p.descr, str[i]);//for use without struct
    sprintf(buf, "%s: %dn", p.descr, p.val);//for use with struct
    sprintf(buf, "%s: %dn", str[i], result);//for use without struct
    printf(buf);
    sleep(10); //10ms delay, For simulation only, to allow clock tick for rand() function
    }
    return 0;
    }

    //simple simulation of analog read function
    int analogRead(int type)
    {
    int meas = 0;
    srand(clock());
    switch(type) {
    case FLAME_SENSOR:
    // meas = read flame sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    case DISTANCE_SENSOR:
    // meas = read dist sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    case MOTION_SENSOR:
    // meas = read motion sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    case TOUCH_SENSOR:
    // meas = read touch sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    case SOUND_SENSOR:
    // meas = read sound sensor instrument
    meas = rand()%10;
    break;
    // add more case statements ???
    default:
    meas = some error
    break;
    }
    return meas;
    }






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 21 '18 at 14:38

























    answered Nov 21 '18 at 14:01









    ryykerryyker

    12.6k22959




    12.6k22959













    • why strcpy(p.descr, str[i]); printf("%s"... p.descr) when you can just sprintf("%s" str[i]) ?

      – Kamil Cuk
      Nov 21 '18 at 14:16











    • @KamilCuk - Ummm. I don't know. Good catch :) (i'll fix that) Thanks.

      – ryyker
      Nov 21 '18 at 14:18



















    • why strcpy(p.descr, str[i]); printf("%s"... p.descr) when you can just sprintf("%s" str[i]) ?

      – Kamil Cuk
      Nov 21 '18 at 14:16











    • @KamilCuk - Ummm. I don't know. Good catch :) (i'll fix that) Thanks.

      – ryyker
      Nov 21 '18 at 14:18

















    why strcpy(p.descr, str[i]); printf("%s"... p.descr) when you can just sprintf("%s" str[i]) ?

    – Kamil Cuk
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:16





    why strcpy(p.descr, str[i]); printf("%s"... p.descr) when you can just sprintf("%s" str[i]) ?

    – Kamil Cuk
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:16













    @KamilCuk - Ummm. I don't know. Good catch :) (i'll fix that) Thanks.

    – ryyker
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:18





    @KamilCuk - Ummm. I don't know. Good catch :) (i'll fix that) Thanks.

    – ryyker
    Nov 21 '18 at 14:18













    2














    From arduino reference:



    > analogRead()
    >
    > Returns
    > int(0 to 1023)


    So you are getting integers anyway.



    Usually I create a temporary structure will all the different data and context I need to iterate through. Then a simple loop is sufficient.



    struct data_s {
    const char *desc;
    int pin;
    enum data_type_s {
    DATA_INT,
    DATA_BOOL,
    } data_type;
    } const datas = {
    { SOUND_SENSOR, "sound", DATA_INT },
    { DISTANCE_SENSOR, "distance", DATA_INT },
    { SOMEBOOLEAN_SENSOR, "someboolean", DATA_BOOL },
    ... and so on ...
    };

    for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(datas)/sizeof(*datas); ++i) {
    Serial.print(data[i].desc);
    Serial.print(";");
    const int readed_value = analogRead(data[i].pin);
    switch (data[i].type) {
    case DATA_BOOL:
    // custom int->bool conversion
    Serial.print(value ? "true" : "false");
    break;
    case DATA_INT:
    Serial.print(value);
    break;
    }
    Serial.print("n");
    }





    share|improve this answer




























      2














      From arduino reference:



      > analogRead()
      >
      > Returns
      > int(0 to 1023)


      So you are getting integers anyway.



      Usually I create a temporary structure will all the different data and context I need to iterate through. Then a simple loop is sufficient.



      struct data_s {
      const char *desc;
      int pin;
      enum data_type_s {
      DATA_INT,
      DATA_BOOL,
      } data_type;
      } const datas = {
      { SOUND_SENSOR, "sound", DATA_INT },
      { DISTANCE_SENSOR, "distance", DATA_INT },
      { SOMEBOOLEAN_SENSOR, "someboolean", DATA_BOOL },
      ... and so on ...
      };

      for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(datas)/sizeof(*datas); ++i) {
      Serial.print(data[i].desc);
      Serial.print(";");
      const int readed_value = analogRead(data[i].pin);
      switch (data[i].type) {
      case DATA_BOOL:
      // custom int->bool conversion
      Serial.print(value ? "true" : "false");
      break;
      case DATA_INT:
      Serial.print(value);
      break;
      }
      Serial.print("n");
      }





      share|improve this answer


























        2












        2








        2







        From arduino reference:



        > analogRead()
        >
        > Returns
        > int(0 to 1023)


        So you are getting integers anyway.



        Usually I create a temporary structure will all the different data and context I need to iterate through. Then a simple loop is sufficient.



        struct data_s {
        const char *desc;
        int pin;
        enum data_type_s {
        DATA_INT,
        DATA_BOOL,
        } data_type;
        } const datas = {
        { SOUND_SENSOR, "sound", DATA_INT },
        { DISTANCE_SENSOR, "distance", DATA_INT },
        { SOMEBOOLEAN_SENSOR, "someboolean", DATA_BOOL },
        ... and so on ...
        };

        for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(datas)/sizeof(*datas); ++i) {
        Serial.print(data[i].desc);
        Serial.print(";");
        const int readed_value = analogRead(data[i].pin);
        switch (data[i].type) {
        case DATA_BOOL:
        // custom int->bool conversion
        Serial.print(value ? "true" : "false");
        break;
        case DATA_INT:
        Serial.print(value);
        break;
        }
        Serial.print("n");
        }





        share|improve this answer













        From arduino reference:



        > analogRead()
        >
        > Returns
        > int(0 to 1023)


        So you are getting integers anyway.



        Usually I create a temporary structure will all the different data and context I need to iterate through. Then a simple loop is sufficient.



        struct data_s {
        const char *desc;
        int pin;
        enum data_type_s {
        DATA_INT,
        DATA_BOOL,
        } data_type;
        } const datas = {
        { SOUND_SENSOR, "sound", DATA_INT },
        { DISTANCE_SENSOR, "distance", DATA_INT },
        { SOMEBOOLEAN_SENSOR, "someboolean", DATA_BOOL },
        ... and so on ...
        };

        for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(datas)/sizeof(*datas); ++i) {
        Serial.print(data[i].desc);
        Serial.print(";");
        const int readed_value = analogRead(data[i].pin);
        switch (data[i].type) {
        case DATA_BOOL:
        // custom int->bool conversion
        Serial.print(value ? "true" : "false");
        break;
        case DATA_INT:
        Serial.print(value);
        break;
        }
        Serial.print("n");
        }






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 21 '18 at 14:24









        Kamil CukKamil Cuk

        12.5k1529




        12.5k1529






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53413090%2fmost-efficient-way-of-printing-different-types-from-the-same-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            鏡平學校

            ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

            Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?