OkHttp Call timeout from Retrofit Interceptor using Annotations is not applied












11















I'm trying to use a recently added feature from OkHttp 3.12.0: full-operation timeouts.
For that, I also rely on the new Invocation class from retrofit 2.5.0 that allows me to retrieve the method annotations.



The annotation is:



@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Target(ElementType.METHOD)
public @interface Timeout {

int value();

TimeUnit unit();

}


The retrofit interface is:



public interface AgentApi {

@Timeout(value = 100, unit = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
@GET("something")
Call<String> getSomething();

}


And the interceptor is:



class TimeoutInterceptor implements Interceptor {

@NonNull
@Override
public Response intercept(@NonNull Chain chain) throws IOException {
Request request = chain.request();
final Invocation tag = request.tag(Invocation.class);
final Method method = tag != null ? tag.method() : null;
final Timeout timeout = method != null ? method.getAnnotation(Timeout.class) : null;
if (timeout != null) {
chain.call().timeout().timeout(timeout.value(), timeout.unit());
}
return chain.proceed(request);
}

}


I've correctly added the TimeoutInterceptor with .addInterceptor(...) in the OkHttpClient provided to the Retrofit Builder.



Unfortunately, it doesn't work as I expected. The calls are not failing when the timeout is reached?



Though it works fine when using the chain methods from the interceptor:



chain
.withConnectTimeout(connect, unit)
.withReadTimeout(read, unit)
.withWriteTimeout(write, unit)


Is this because the call timeout must be set before the call is enqueued? (and the Interceptor is triggered too late in the process?), or is this something else?










share|improve this question























  • That's really strange. I made a similiar test here and happens the same thing. It works If I use the old methods to set timeout at the interceptor, but when I try to change using full-operation timeoust it is ignored. It only works when I set at the OkHttpClientBuilder. At documentation it says we can should use by the OkHttpClientBuilder.callTimeout() or by Call.timeout()

    – haroldolivieri
    Nov 30 '18 at 12:10
















11















I'm trying to use a recently added feature from OkHttp 3.12.0: full-operation timeouts.
For that, I also rely on the new Invocation class from retrofit 2.5.0 that allows me to retrieve the method annotations.



The annotation is:



@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Target(ElementType.METHOD)
public @interface Timeout {

int value();

TimeUnit unit();

}


The retrofit interface is:



public interface AgentApi {

@Timeout(value = 100, unit = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
@GET("something")
Call<String> getSomething();

}


And the interceptor is:



class TimeoutInterceptor implements Interceptor {

@NonNull
@Override
public Response intercept(@NonNull Chain chain) throws IOException {
Request request = chain.request();
final Invocation tag = request.tag(Invocation.class);
final Method method = tag != null ? tag.method() : null;
final Timeout timeout = method != null ? method.getAnnotation(Timeout.class) : null;
if (timeout != null) {
chain.call().timeout().timeout(timeout.value(), timeout.unit());
}
return chain.proceed(request);
}

}


I've correctly added the TimeoutInterceptor with .addInterceptor(...) in the OkHttpClient provided to the Retrofit Builder.



Unfortunately, it doesn't work as I expected. The calls are not failing when the timeout is reached?



Though it works fine when using the chain methods from the interceptor:



chain
.withConnectTimeout(connect, unit)
.withReadTimeout(read, unit)
.withWriteTimeout(write, unit)


Is this because the call timeout must be set before the call is enqueued? (and the Interceptor is triggered too late in the process?), or is this something else?










share|improve this question























  • That's really strange. I made a similiar test here and happens the same thing. It works If I use the old methods to set timeout at the interceptor, but when I try to change using full-operation timeoust it is ignored. It only works when I set at the OkHttpClientBuilder. At documentation it says we can should use by the OkHttpClientBuilder.callTimeout() or by Call.timeout()

    – haroldolivieri
    Nov 30 '18 at 12:10














11












11








11


2






I'm trying to use a recently added feature from OkHttp 3.12.0: full-operation timeouts.
For that, I also rely on the new Invocation class from retrofit 2.5.0 that allows me to retrieve the method annotations.



The annotation is:



@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Target(ElementType.METHOD)
public @interface Timeout {

int value();

TimeUnit unit();

}


The retrofit interface is:



public interface AgentApi {

@Timeout(value = 100, unit = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
@GET("something")
Call<String> getSomething();

}


And the interceptor is:



class TimeoutInterceptor implements Interceptor {

@NonNull
@Override
public Response intercept(@NonNull Chain chain) throws IOException {
Request request = chain.request();
final Invocation tag = request.tag(Invocation.class);
final Method method = tag != null ? tag.method() : null;
final Timeout timeout = method != null ? method.getAnnotation(Timeout.class) : null;
if (timeout != null) {
chain.call().timeout().timeout(timeout.value(), timeout.unit());
}
return chain.proceed(request);
}

}


I've correctly added the TimeoutInterceptor with .addInterceptor(...) in the OkHttpClient provided to the Retrofit Builder.



Unfortunately, it doesn't work as I expected. The calls are not failing when the timeout is reached?



Though it works fine when using the chain methods from the interceptor:



chain
.withConnectTimeout(connect, unit)
.withReadTimeout(read, unit)
.withWriteTimeout(write, unit)


Is this because the call timeout must be set before the call is enqueued? (and the Interceptor is triggered too late in the process?), or is this something else?










share|improve this question














I'm trying to use a recently added feature from OkHttp 3.12.0: full-operation timeouts.
For that, I also rely on the new Invocation class from retrofit 2.5.0 that allows me to retrieve the method annotations.



The annotation is:



@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Target(ElementType.METHOD)
public @interface Timeout {

int value();

TimeUnit unit();

}


The retrofit interface is:



public interface AgentApi {

@Timeout(value = 100, unit = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
@GET("something")
Call<String> getSomething();

}


And the interceptor is:



class TimeoutInterceptor implements Interceptor {

@NonNull
@Override
public Response intercept(@NonNull Chain chain) throws IOException {
Request request = chain.request();
final Invocation tag = request.tag(Invocation.class);
final Method method = tag != null ? tag.method() : null;
final Timeout timeout = method != null ? method.getAnnotation(Timeout.class) : null;
if (timeout != null) {
chain.call().timeout().timeout(timeout.value(), timeout.unit());
}
return chain.proceed(request);
}

}


I've correctly added the TimeoutInterceptor with .addInterceptor(...) in the OkHttpClient provided to the Retrofit Builder.



Unfortunately, it doesn't work as I expected. The calls are not failing when the timeout is reached?



Though it works fine when using the chain methods from the interceptor:



chain
.withConnectTimeout(connect, unit)
.withReadTimeout(read, unit)
.withWriteTimeout(write, unit)


Is this because the call timeout must be set before the call is enqueued? (and the Interceptor is triggered too late in the process?), or is this something else?







android retrofit retrofit2 okhttp okhttp3






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 21 '18 at 14:03









Simon MarquisSimon Marquis

5,25811734




5,25811734













  • That's really strange. I made a similiar test here and happens the same thing. It works If I use the old methods to set timeout at the interceptor, but when I try to change using full-operation timeoust it is ignored. It only works when I set at the OkHttpClientBuilder. At documentation it says we can should use by the OkHttpClientBuilder.callTimeout() or by Call.timeout()

    – haroldolivieri
    Nov 30 '18 at 12:10



















  • That's really strange. I made a similiar test here and happens the same thing. It works If I use the old methods to set timeout at the interceptor, but when I try to change using full-operation timeoust it is ignored. It only works when I set at the OkHttpClientBuilder. At documentation it says we can should use by the OkHttpClientBuilder.callTimeout() or by Call.timeout()

    – haroldolivieri
    Nov 30 '18 at 12:10

















That's really strange. I made a similiar test here and happens the same thing. It works If I use the old methods to set timeout at the interceptor, but when I try to change using full-operation timeoust it is ignored. It only works when I set at the OkHttpClientBuilder. At documentation it says we can should use by the OkHttpClientBuilder.callTimeout() or by Call.timeout()

– haroldolivieri
Nov 30 '18 at 12:10





That's really strange. I made a similiar test here and happens the same thing. It works If I use the old methods to set timeout at the interceptor, but when I try to change using full-operation timeoust it is ignored. It only works when I set at the OkHttpClientBuilder. At documentation it says we can should use by the OkHttpClientBuilder.callTimeout() or by Call.timeout()

– haroldolivieri
Nov 30 '18 at 12:10












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Unfortunately you are right. It is because OkHttpClient gets timeouts before it executes interceptors chain. If you look at Response execute() method in okhttp3.RealCall class you will find line timeout.enter() that is where OkHttp schedules timeouts and it is invoked before getResponseWithInterceptorChain() which is place where interceptors are executed.



Fortunately you can write workaround for that :)
Put your TimeoutInterceptor in okhttp3 package (you can create that package in your app). That will allow you to have access to RealCall object which has package visibility. Your TimeoutInterceptor class should look like this:



package okhttp3;

public class TimeoutInterceptor implements Interceptor {

@Override
public Response intercept(Chain chain) throws IOException {
Request request = chain.request();
Invocation tag = request.tag(Invocation.class);
Method method = tag != null ? tag.method() : null;
Timeout timeout = method != null ? method.getAnnotation(Timeout.class) : null;
if (timeout != null) {
chain.call().timeout().timeout(timeout.value(), timeout.unit());
RealCall realCall = (RealCall) chain.call();
realCall.timeout.enter();
}
return chain.proceed(request);
}
}


Workaround consists in executing timeout.enter() once again after changing timeout.
All magic happen in lines:



RealCall realCall = (RealCall) chain.call();
realCall.timeout.enter();


Good luck!






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Thanks a lot! It works perfectly. I'd also add realCall.timeout.exit() just before realCall.timeout.enter() to avoid IllegalStateException if a timeout was previously set by the OkHttpClient for instance.

    – Simon Marquis
    Feb 15 at 18:56











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53413822%2fokhttp-call-timeout-from-retrofit-interceptor-using-annotations-is-not-applied%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














Unfortunately you are right. It is because OkHttpClient gets timeouts before it executes interceptors chain. If you look at Response execute() method in okhttp3.RealCall class you will find line timeout.enter() that is where OkHttp schedules timeouts and it is invoked before getResponseWithInterceptorChain() which is place where interceptors are executed.



Fortunately you can write workaround for that :)
Put your TimeoutInterceptor in okhttp3 package (you can create that package in your app). That will allow you to have access to RealCall object which has package visibility. Your TimeoutInterceptor class should look like this:



package okhttp3;

public class TimeoutInterceptor implements Interceptor {

@Override
public Response intercept(Chain chain) throws IOException {
Request request = chain.request();
Invocation tag = request.tag(Invocation.class);
Method method = tag != null ? tag.method() : null;
Timeout timeout = method != null ? method.getAnnotation(Timeout.class) : null;
if (timeout != null) {
chain.call().timeout().timeout(timeout.value(), timeout.unit());
RealCall realCall = (RealCall) chain.call();
realCall.timeout.enter();
}
return chain.proceed(request);
}
}


Workaround consists in executing timeout.enter() once again after changing timeout.
All magic happen in lines:



RealCall realCall = (RealCall) chain.call();
realCall.timeout.enter();


Good luck!






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Thanks a lot! It works perfectly. I'd also add realCall.timeout.exit() just before realCall.timeout.enter() to avoid IllegalStateException if a timeout was previously set by the OkHttpClient for instance.

    – Simon Marquis
    Feb 15 at 18:56
















1














Unfortunately you are right. It is because OkHttpClient gets timeouts before it executes interceptors chain. If you look at Response execute() method in okhttp3.RealCall class you will find line timeout.enter() that is where OkHttp schedules timeouts and it is invoked before getResponseWithInterceptorChain() which is place where interceptors are executed.



Fortunately you can write workaround for that :)
Put your TimeoutInterceptor in okhttp3 package (you can create that package in your app). That will allow you to have access to RealCall object which has package visibility. Your TimeoutInterceptor class should look like this:



package okhttp3;

public class TimeoutInterceptor implements Interceptor {

@Override
public Response intercept(Chain chain) throws IOException {
Request request = chain.request();
Invocation tag = request.tag(Invocation.class);
Method method = tag != null ? tag.method() : null;
Timeout timeout = method != null ? method.getAnnotation(Timeout.class) : null;
if (timeout != null) {
chain.call().timeout().timeout(timeout.value(), timeout.unit());
RealCall realCall = (RealCall) chain.call();
realCall.timeout.enter();
}
return chain.proceed(request);
}
}


Workaround consists in executing timeout.enter() once again after changing timeout.
All magic happen in lines:



RealCall realCall = (RealCall) chain.call();
realCall.timeout.enter();


Good luck!






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Thanks a lot! It works perfectly. I'd also add realCall.timeout.exit() just before realCall.timeout.enter() to avoid IllegalStateException if a timeout was previously set by the OkHttpClient for instance.

    – Simon Marquis
    Feb 15 at 18:56














1












1








1







Unfortunately you are right. It is because OkHttpClient gets timeouts before it executes interceptors chain. If you look at Response execute() method in okhttp3.RealCall class you will find line timeout.enter() that is where OkHttp schedules timeouts and it is invoked before getResponseWithInterceptorChain() which is place where interceptors are executed.



Fortunately you can write workaround for that :)
Put your TimeoutInterceptor in okhttp3 package (you can create that package in your app). That will allow you to have access to RealCall object which has package visibility. Your TimeoutInterceptor class should look like this:



package okhttp3;

public class TimeoutInterceptor implements Interceptor {

@Override
public Response intercept(Chain chain) throws IOException {
Request request = chain.request();
Invocation tag = request.tag(Invocation.class);
Method method = tag != null ? tag.method() : null;
Timeout timeout = method != null ? method.getAnnotation(Timeout.class) : null;
if (timeout != null) {
chain.call().timeout().timeout(timeout.value(), timeout.unit());
RealCall realCall = (RealCall) chain.call();
realCall.timeout.enter();
}
return chain.proceed(request);
}
}


Workaround consists in executing timeout.enter() once again after changing timeout.
All magic happen in lines:



RealCall realCall = (RealCall) chain.call();
realCall.timeout.enter();


Good luck!






share|improve this answer















Unfortunately you are right. It is because OkHttpClient gets timeouts before it executes interceptors chain. If you look at Response execute() method in okhttp3.RealCall class you will find line timeout.enter() that is where OkHttp schedules timeouts and it is invoked before getResponseWithInterceptorChain() which is place where interceptors are executed.



Fortunately you can write workaround for that :)
Put your TimeoutInterceptor in okhttp3 package (you can create that package in your app). That will allow you to have access to RealCall object which has package visibility. Your TimeoutInterceptor class should look like this:



package okhttp3;

public class TimeoutInterceptor implements Interceptor {

@Override
public Response intercept(Chain chain) throws IOException {
Request request = chain.request();
Invocation tag = request.tag(Invocation.class);
Method method = tag != null ? tag.method() : null;
Timeout timeout = method != null ? method.getAnnotation(Timeout.class) : null;
if (timeout != null) {
chain.call().timeout().timeout(timeout.value(), timeout.unit());
RealCall realCall = (RealCall) chain.call();
realCall.timeout.enter();
}
return chain.proceed(request);
}
}


Workaround consists in executing timeout.enter() once again after changing timeout.
All magic happen in lines:



RealCall realCall = (RealCall) chain.call();
realCall.timeout.enter();


Good luck!







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Feb 13 at 15:46

























answered Feb 13 at 15:39









lukjarlukjar

2,22011629




2,22011629








  • 1





    Thanks a lot! It works perfectly. I'd also add realCall.timeout.exit() just before realCall.timeout.enter() to avoid IllegalStateException if a timeout was previously set by the OkHttpClient for instance.

    – Simon Marquis
    Feb 15 at 18:56














  • 1





    Thanks a lot! It works perfectly. I'd also add realCall.timeout.exit() just before realCall.timeout.enter() to avoid IllegalStateException if a timeout was previously set by the OkHttpClient for instance.

    – Simon Marquis
    Feb 15 at 18:56








1




1





Thanks a lot! It works perfectly. I'd also add realCall.timeout.exit() just before realCall.timeout.enter() to avoid IllegalStateException if a timeout was previously set by the OkHttpClient for instance.

– Simon Marquis
Feb 15 at 18:56





Thanks a lot! It works perfectly. I'd also add realCall.timeout.exit() just before realCall.timeout.enter() to avoid IllegalStateException if a timeout was previously set by the OkHttpClient for instance.

– Simon Marquis
Feb 15 at 18:56




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53413822%2fokhttp-call-timeout-from-retrofit-interceptor-using-annotations-is-not-applied%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

鏡平學校

ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?