parallel pool not recognizing global variables












3















I have a MATLAB program that I want to run in parallel so that it runs faster. However, when I do that parallel workers seem not to be able to access global variables created beforehand. Here is what my code looks like:



createData  % a .m file that creates a global variable (Var)
parfor i:j
processData() % a function that is dependent on some global variables
end


However, I get an error message undefined function or variable Var. I've already included a call for global variables global Var inside the function processData() but this is not working either. Is there any way of making global variables visible within the parallel loop?



This is not the same question as here as I declared global variables outside of the parfor loop and want to access them within the loop with out the need to modify or update the its value across workers of the parallel loop.










share|improve this question

























  • I think this question is different from the link you provided @Adriaan. I've declared the global variable out side the parfor loop and what I want to do is to access the variable within the loop not modify it or update its value across workers

    – Abdallah Atef
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:21











  • Sorry, rereading the 2nd answer, read the first sentence: "GLOBAL data is hard to use inside PARFOR because each worker is a separate MATLAB process, and global variables are not synchronised from the client (or any other process) to the workers." emphasis mine. Ergo: the author of the toolbox tells you that setting a global outside a parfor (or in the body of the loop) will not work. All that will work is setting up a function inside the parfor setting the global. Not ideal, but all you've got. global is generally bad anyways, might as well avoid it completely.

    – Adriaan
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:31













  • Thanks @Adriaan. I'll try to reformulate with more detail so that I can get more focused answer specific to my situation.

    – Abdallah Atef
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:45
















3















I have a MATLAB program that I want to run in parallel so that it runs faster. However, when I do that parallel workers seem not to be able to access global variables created beforehand. Here is what my code looks like:



createData  % a .m file that creates a global variable (Var)
parfor i:j
processData() % a function that is dependent on some global variables
end


However, I get an error message undefined function or variable Var. I've already included a call for global variables global Var inside the function processData() but this is not working either. Is there any way of making global variables visible within the parallel loop?



This is not the same question as here as I declared global variables outside of the parfor loop and want to access them within the loop with out the need to modify or update the its value across workers of the parallel loop.










share|improve this question

























  • I think this question is different from the link you provided @Adriaan. I've declared the global variable out side the parfor loop and what I want to do is to access the variable within the loop not modify it or update its value across workers

    – Abdallah Atef
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:21











  • Sorry, rereading the 2nd answer, read the first sentence: "GLOBAL data is hard to use inside PARFOR because each worker is a separate MATLAB process, and global variables are not synchronised from the client (or any other process) to the workers." emphasis mine. Ergo: the author of the toolbox tells you that setting a global outside a parfor (or in the body of the loop) will not work. All that will work is setting up a function inside the parfor setting the global. Not ideal, but all you've got. global is generally bad anyways, might as well avoid it completely.

    – Adriaan
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:31













  • Thanks @Adriaan. I'll try to reformulate with more detail so that I can get more focused answer specific to my situation.

    – Abdallah Atef
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:45














3












3








3








I have a MATLAB program that I want to run in parallel so that it runs faster. However, when I do that parallel workers seem not to be able to access global variables created beforehand. Here is what my code looks like:



createData  % a .m file that creates a global variable (Var)
parfor i:j
processData() % a function that is dependent on some global variables
end


However, I get an error message undefined function or variable Var. I've already included a call for global variables global Var inside the function processData() but this is not working either. Is there any way of making global variables visible within the parallel loop?



This is not the same question as here as I declared global variables outside of the parfor loop and want to access them within the loop with out the need to modify or update the its value across workers of the parallel loop.










share|improve this question
















I have a MATLAB program that I want to run in parallel so that it runs faster. However, when I do that parallel workers seem not to be able to access global variables created beforehand. Here is what my code looks like:



createData  % a .m file that creates a global variable (Var)
parfor i:j
processData() % a function that is dependent on some global variables
end


However, I get an error message undefined function or variable Var. I've already included a call for global variables global Var inside the function processData() but this is not working either. Is there any way of making global variables visible within the parallel loop?



This is not the same question as here as I declared global variables outside of the parfor loop and want to access them within the loop with out the need to modify or update the its value across workers of the parallel loop.







matlab parallel-processing global-variables parfor






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 21 '18 at 6:40









Adriaan

12.9k63162




12.9k63162










asked Nov 20 '18 at 20:54









Abdallah AtefAbdallah Atef

4731110




4731110













  • I think this question is different from the link you provided @Adriaan. I've declared the global variable out side the parfor loop and what I want to do is to access the variable within the loop not modify it or update its value across workers

    – Abdallah Atef
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:21











  • Sorry, rereading the 2nd answer, read the first sentence: "GLOBAL data is hard to use inside PARFOR because each worker is a separate MATLAB process, and global variables are not synchronised from the client (or any other process) to the workers." emphasis mine. Ergo: the author of the toolbox tells you that setting a global outside a parfor (or in the body of the loop) will not work. All that will work is setting up a function inside the parfor setting the global. Not ideal, but all you've got. global is generally bad anyways, might as well avoid it completely.

    – Adriaan
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:31













  • Thanks @Adriaan. I'll try to reformulate with more detail so that I can get more focused answer specific to my situation.

    – Abdallah Atef
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:45



















  • I think this question is different from the link you provided @Adriaan. I've declared the global variable out side the parfor loop and what I want to do is to access the variable within the loop not modify it or update its value across workers

    – Abdallah Atef
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:21











  • Sorry, rereading the 2nd answer, read the first sentence: "GLOBAL data is hard to use inside PARFOR because each worker is a separate MATLAB process, and global variables are not synchronised from the client (or any other process) to the workers." emphasis mine. Ergo: the author of the toolbox tells you that setting a global outside a parfor (or in the body of the loop) will not work. All that will work is setting up a function inside the parfor setting the global. Not ideal, but all you've got. global is generally bad anyways, might as well avoid it completely.

    – Adriaan
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:31













  • Thanks @Adriaan. I'll try to reformulate with more detail so that I can get more focused answer specific to my situation.

    – Abdallah Atef
    Nov 20 '18 at 22:45

















I think this question is different from the link you provided @Adriaan. I've declared the global variable out side the parfor loop and what I want to do is to access the variable within the loop not modify it or update its value across workers

– Abdallah Atef
Nov 20 '18 at 22:21





I think this question is different from the link you provided @Adriaan. I've declared the global variable out side the parfor loop and what I want to do is to access the variable within the loop not modify it or update its value across workers

– Abdallah Atef
Nov 20 '18 at 22:21













Sorry, rereading the 2nd answer, read the first sentence: "GLOBAL data is hard to use inside PARFOR because each worker is a separate MATLAB process, and global variables are not synchronised from the client (or any other process) to the workers." emphasis mine. Ergo: the author of the toolbox tells you that setting a global outside a parfor (or in the body of the loop) will not work. All that will work is setting up a function inside the parfor setting the global. Not ideal, but all you've got. global is generally bad anyways, might as well avoid it completely.

– Adriaan
Nov 20 '18 at 22:31







Sorry, rereading the 2nd answer, read the first sentence: "GLOBAL data is hard to use inside PARFOR because each worker is a separate MATLAB process, and global variables are not synchronised from the client (or any other process) to the workers." emphasis mine. Ergo: the author of the toolbox tells you that setting a global outside a parfor (or in the body of the loop) will not work. All that will work is setting up a function inside the parfor setting the global. Not ideal, but all you've got. global is generally bad anyways, might as well avoid it completely.

– Adriaan
Nov 20 '18 at 22:31















Thanks @Adriaan. I'll try to reformulate with more detail so that I can get more focused answer specific to my situation.

– Abdallah Atef
Nov 20 '18 at 22:45





Thanks @Adriaan. I'll try to reformulate with more detail so that I can get more focused answer specific to my situation.

– Abdallah Atef
Nov 20 '18 at 22:45












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














The simplest advice is: don't use global for the myriad reasons already described/linked here. Ideally, you would restructure your code like so:



Var = createData(); % returns 'Var' rather than creating a global 'Var'
parfor idx = ...
% simply use 'Var' inside the parfor loop.
out(idx) = processData(Var, ...);
end


Note that parfor is smart enough to send Var to each worker exactly once for the above loop. However, it isn't smart enough not to send it across multiple times if you have multiple parfor loops. In that case, I would suggest using parallel.pool.Constant. How you use that depends on the cost of creating Var compared to its size. If it is small, but expensive to create - that implies you're best off creating it only once at the client and sending it to the workers, like this:



cVar = parallel.pool.Constant(Var);


If it is large, but relatively quick to construct, you could consider getting the workers each to construct their own copy independently, like this:



cVar = parallel.pool.Constant(@createData); % invokes 'createData' on each worker





share|improve this answer
























  • One more question @Edric, is it possible for the parallel.pool.Constant to be accessible by the client. The situation I'm having is the the function processData() is called several times in the model. Some of which are within normal for loop (unparallelizable part of the model). The function is also called within a parfor loop. So, I want that constant to be available to both workers and client as well. Thanks in advance

    – Abdallah Atef
    Nov 21 '18 at 22:03













  • Unfortunately, right now, the value held by the parallel.pool.Constant doesn't exist at the client.

    – Edric
    Nov 22 '18 at 6:23



















3














Citing the author of the parallel toolbox:




GLOBAL data is hard to use inside PARFOR because each worker is a separate MATLAB process, and global variables are not synchronised from the client (or any other process) to the workers.




Emphasis mine. So the only way to get a global variable on a worker (which is a bad idea for reasons mentioned in the linked post) is to write a function which sets up the global variables, run that on each worker, then run your own, global-dependent function.



Citing another comment of mine to illustrate why this is a bad idea:




One of the pitfalls in terms of good practise is that you can suddenly overwrite a variable which is used inside a function in other functions. Therefore it can be difficult to keep track of changes and going back and forth between functions might cause unexpected behaviour because of that. This happens especially often if you call your global variables things like h, a etc (this of course makes for bad reading also when the variable is not global)




And finally an article outlining most of the reasons using global variables is generally a bad idea.



Bottom line: what you want is not possible, and generally thought to be bad practise.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53401372%2fparallel-pool-not-recognizing-global-variables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    The simplest advice is: don't use global for the myriad reasons already described/linked here. Ideally, you would restructure your code like so:



    Var = createData(); % returns 'Var' rather than creating a global 'Var'
    parfor idx = ...
    % simply use 'Var' inside the parfor loop.
    out(idx) = processData(Var, ...);
    end


    Note that parfor is smart enough to send Var to each worker exactly once for the above loop. However, it isn't smart enough not to send it across multiple times if you have multiple parfor loops. In that case, I would suggest using parallel.pool.Constant. How you use that depends on the cost of creating Var compared to its size. If it is small, but expensive to create - that implies you're best off creating it only once at the client and sending it to the workers, like this:



    cVar = parallel.pool.Constant(Var);


    If it is large, but relatively quick to construct, you could consider getting the workers each to construct their own copy independently, like this:



    cVar = parallel.pool.Constant(@createData); % invokes 'createData' on each worker





    share|improve this answer
























    • One more question @Edric, is it possible for the parallel.pool.Constant to be accessible by the client. The situation I'm having is the the function processData() is called several times in the model. Some of which are within normal for loop (unparallelizable part of the model). The function is also called within a parfor loop. So, I want that constant to be available to both workers and client as well. Thanks in advance

      – Abdallah Atef
      Nov 21 '18 at 22:03













    • Unfortunately, right now, the value held by the parallel.pool.Constant doesn't exist at the client.

      – Edric
      Nov 22 '18 at 6:23
















    4














    The simplest advice is: don't use global for the myriad reasons already described/linked here. Ideally, you would restructure your code like so:



    Var = createData(); % returns 'Var' rather than creating a global 'Var'
    parfor idx = ...
    % simply use 'Var' inside the parfor loop.
    out(idx) = processData(Var, ...);
    end


    Note that parfor is smart enough to send Var to each worker exactly once for the above loop. However, it isn't smart enough not to send it across multiple times if you have multiple parfor loops. In that case, I would suggest using parallel.pool.Constant. How you use that depends on the cost of creating Var compared to its size. If it is small, but expensive to create - that implies you're best off creating it only once at the client and sending it to the workers, like this:



    cVar = parallel.pool.Constant(Var);


    If it is large, but relatively quick to construct, you could consider getting the workers each to construct their own copy independently, like this:



    cVar = parallel.pool.Constant(@createData); % invokes 'createData' on each worker





    share|improve this answer
























    • One more question @Edric, is it possible for the parallel.pool.Constant to be accessible by the client. The situation I'm having is the the function processData() is called several times in the model. Some of which are within normal for loop (unparallelizable part of the model). The function is also called within a parfor loop. So, I want that constant to be available to both workers and client as well. Thanks in advance

      – Abdallah Atef
      Nov 21 '18 at 22:03













    • Unfortunately, right now, the value held by the parallel.pool.Constant doesn't exist at the client.

      – Edric
      Nov 22 '18 at 6:23














    4












    4








    4







    The simplest advice is: don't use global for the myriad reasons already described/linked here. Ideally, you would restructure your code like so:



    Var = createData(); % returns 'Var' rather than creating a global 'Var'
    parfor idx = ...
    % simply use 'Var' inside the parfor loop.
    out(idx) = processData(Var, ...);
    end


    Note that parfor is smart enough to send Var to each worker exactly once for the above loop. However, it isn't smart enough not to send it across multiple times if you have multiple parfor loops. In that case, I would suggest using parallel.pool.Constant. How you use that depends on the cost of creating Var compared to its size. If it is small, but expensive to create - that implies you're best off creating it only once at the client and sending it to the workers, like this:



    cVar = parallel.pool.Constant(Var);


    If it is large, but relatively quick to construct, you could consider getting the workers each to construct their own copy independently, like this:



    cVar = parallel.pool.Constant(@createData); % invokes 'createData' on each worker





    share|improve this answer













    The simplest advice is: don't use global for the myriad reasons already described/linked here. Ideally, you would restructure your code like so:



    Var = createData(); % returns 'Var' rather than creating a global 'Var'
    parfor idx = ...
    % simply use 'Var' inside the parfor loop.
    out(idx) = processData(Var, ...);
    end


    Note that parfor is smart enough to send Var to each worker exactly once for the above loop. However, it isn't smart enough not to send it across multiple times if you have multiple parfor loops. In that case, I would suggest using parallel.pool.Constant. How you use that depends on the cost of creating Var compared to its size. If it is small, but expensive to create - that implies you're best off creating it only once at the client and sending it to the workers, like this:



    cVar = parallel.pool.Constant(Var);


    If it is large, but relatively quick to construct, you could consider getting the workers each to construct their own copy independently, like this:



    cVar = parallel.pool.Constant(@createData); % invokes 'createData' on each worker






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Nov 21 '18 at 9:01









    EdricEdric

    19.5k23336




    19.5k23336













    • One more question @Edric, is it possible for the parallel.pool.Constant to be accessible by the client. The situation I'm having is the the function processData() is called several times in the model. Some of which are within normal for loop (unparallelizable part of the model). The function is also called within a parfor loop. So, I want that constant to be available to both workers and client as well. Thanks in advance

      – Abdallah Atef
      Nov 21 '18 at 22:03













    • Unfortunately, right now, the value held by the parallel.pool.Constant doesn't exist at the client.

      – Edric
      Nov 22 '18 at 6:23



















    • One more question @Edric, is it possible for the parallel.pool.Constant to be accessible by the client. The situation I'm having is the the function processData() is called several times in the model. Some of which are within normal for loop (unparallelizable part of the model). The function is also called within a parfor loop. So, I want that constant to be available to both workers and client as well. Thanks in advance

      – Abdallah Atef
      Nov 21 '18 at 22:03













    • Unfortunately, right now, the value held by the parallel.pool.Constant doesn't exist at the client.

      – Edric
      Nov 22 '18 at 6:23

















    One more question @Edric, is it possible for the parallel.pool.Constant to be accessible by the client. The situation I'm having is the the function processData() is called several times in the model. Some of which are within normal for loop (unparallelizable part of the model). The function is also called within a parfor loop. So, I want that constant to be available to both workers and client as well. Thanks in advance

    – Abdallah Atef
    Nov 21 '18 at 22:03







    One more question @Edric, is it possible for the parallel.pool.Constant to be accessible by the client. The situation I'm having is the the function processData() is called several times in the model. Some of which are within normal for loop (unparallelizable part of the model). The function is also called within a parfor loop. So, I want that constant to be available to both workers and client as well. Thanks in advance

    – Abdallah Atef
    Nov 21 '18 at 22:03















    Unfortunately, right now, the value held by the parallel.pool.Constant doesn't exist at the client.

    – Edric
    Nov 22 '18 at 6:23





    Unfortunately, right now, the value held by the parallel.pool.Constant doesn't exist at the client.

    – Edric
    Nov 22 '18 at 6:23













    3














    Citing the author of the parallel toolbox:




    GLOBAL data is hard to use inside PARFOR because each worker is a separate MATLAB process, and global variables are not synchronised from the client (or any other process) to the workers.




    Emphasis mine. So the only way to get a global variable on a worker (which is a bad idea for reasons mentioned in the linked post) is to write a function which sets up the global variables, run that on each worker, then run your own, global-dependent function.



    Citing another comment of mine to illustrate why this is a bad idea:




    One of the pitfalls in terms of good practise is that you can suddenly overwrite a variable which is used inside a function in other functions. Therefore it can be difficult to keep track of changes and going back and forth between functions might cause unexpected behaviour because of that. This happens especially often if you call your global variables things like h, a etc (this of course makes for bad reading also when the variable is not global)




    And finally an article outlining most of the reasons using global variables is generally a bad idea.



    Bottom line: what you want is not possible, and generally thought to be bad practise.






    share|improve this answer






























      3














      Citing the author of the parallel toolbox:




      GLOBAL data is hard to use inside PARFOR because each worker is a separate MATLAB process, and global variables are not synchronised from the client (or any other process) to the workers.




      Emphasis mine. So the only way to get a global variable on a worker (which is a bad idea for reasons mentioned in the linked post) is to write a function which sets up the global variables, run that on each worker, then run your own, global-dependent function.



      Citing another comment of mine to illustrate why this is a bad idea:




      One of the pitfalls in terms of good practise is that you can suddenly overwrite a variable which is used inside a function in other functions. Therefore it can be difficult to keep track of changes and going back and forth between functions might cause unexpected behaviour because of that. This happens especially often if you call your global variables things like h, a etc (this of course makes for bad reading also when the variable is not global)




      And finally an article outlining most of the reasons using global variables is generally a bad idea.



      Bottom line: what you want is not possible, and generally thought to be bad practise.






      share|improve this answer




























        3












        3








        3







        Citing the author of the parallel toolbox:




        GLOBAL data is hard to use inside PARFOR because each worker is a separate MATLAB process, and global variables are not synchronised from the client (or any other process) to the workers.




        Emphasis mine. So the only way to get a global variable on a worker (which is a bad idea for reasons mentioned in the linked post) is to write a function which sets up the global variables, run that on each worker, then run your own, global-dependent function.



        Citing another comment of mine to illustrate why this is a bad idea:




        One of the pitfalls in terms of good practise is that you can suddenly overwrite a variable which is used inside a function in other functions. Therefore it can be difficult to keep track of changes and going back and forth between functions might cause unexpected behaviour because of that. This happens especially often if you call your global variables things like h, a etc (this of course makes for bad reading also when the variable is not global)




        And finally an article outlining most of the reasons using global variables is generally a bad idea.



        Bottom line: what you want is not possible, and generally thought to be bad practise.






        share|improve this answer















        Citing the author of the parallel toolbox:




        GLOBAL data is hard to use inside PARFOR because each worker is a separate MATLAB process, and global variables are not synchronised from the client (or any other process) to the workers.




        Emphasis mine. So the only way to get a global variable on a worker (which is a bad idea for reasons mentioned in the linked post) is to write a function which sets up the global variables, run that on each worker, then run your own, global-dependent function.



        Citing another comment of mine to illustrate why this is a bad idea:




        One of the pitfalls in terms of good practise is that you can suddenly overwrite a variable which is used inside a function in other functions. Therefore it can be difficult to keep track of changes and going back and forth between functions might cause unexpected behaviour because of that. This happens especially often if you call your global variables things like h, a etc (this of course makes for bad reading also when the variable is not global)




        And finally an article outlining most of the reasons using global variables is generally a bad idea.



        Bottom line: what you want is not possible, and generally thought to be bad practise.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 21 '18 at 8:40

























        answered Nov 21 '18 at 6:30









        AdriaanAdriaan

        12.9k63162




        12.9k63162






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53401372%2fparallel-pool-not-recognizing-global-variables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            鏡平學校

            ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

            Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?