The correct way to store some metadata associated with an object?












0















Firstly I'm afraid of the memory leak issue here. Because what I do is using some Dictionary to store the metadata with Key of the object itself. So I can lookup for metadata (which should be dynamic) by passing in the object.



Note that the object here does not have any GUID to help identify itself, the only way to identify it is by its instance.
This kind of storing looks much like what in DependencyObject in WPF. We can declare DependencyProperty (attached property) to extend the DependencyObject (the metadata is contained in the attached property).



Here is what I have:



Dictionary<object, SomeMetaData> _metadataLookup = new Dictionary<object,SomeMetaData>();
//to store metadata
_metadataLookup[someObject] = someMetaData;
//to get metadata
SomeMetaData someMetaData;
_metadataLookup.TryGetValue(someObject, out someMetaData);


It would be fine if the someObject's lifetime is the same as the lifetime of the scope using the _metadataLookup. But what if the someObject (after stored in _metadataLookup) should be destroyed (logically become unused)? We have to manually remove it from _metadataLookup as well, otherwise there is a memory leak there.



I'm seeking for a better solution for this issue, unexpectedly forgetting to remove the objects manually or simply not knowing when the objects should be removed is a problem here. Thanks.










share|improve this question























  • Yeah storing the reference is probably not a good thing. however you could store the hashcode, though you will have to implement it properly

    – Michael Randall
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:39













  • @TheGeneral thanks, are you sure that the Hash code could help identify the objects without any contention?

    – Hopeless
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:40


















0















Firstly I'm afraid of the memory leak issue here. Because what I do is using some Dictionary to store the metadata with Key of the object itself. So I can lookup for metadata (which should be dynamic) by passing in the object.



Note that the object here does not have any GUID to help identify itself, the only way to identify it is by its instance.
This kind of storing looks much like what in DependencyObject in WPF. We can declare DependencyProperty (attached property) to extend the DependencyObject (the metadata is contained in the attached property).



Here is what I have:



Dictionary<object, SomeMetaData> _metadataLookup = new Dictionary<object,SomeMetaData>();
//to store metadata
_metadataLookup[someObject] = someMetaData;
//to get metadata
SomeMetaData someMetaData;
_metadataLookup.TryGetValue(someObject, out someMetaData);


It would be fine if the someObject's lifetime is the same as the lifetime of the scope using the _metadataLookup. But what if the someObject (after stored in _metadataLookup) should be destroyed (logically become unused)? We have to manually remove it from _metadataLookup as well, otherwise there is a memory leak there.



I'm seeking for a better solution for this issue, unexpectedly forgetting to remove the objects manually or simply not knowing when the objects should be removed is a problem here. Thanks.










share|improve this question























  • Yeah storing the reference is probably not a good thing. however you could store the hashcode, though you will have to implement it properly

    – Michael Randall
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:39













  • @TheGeneral thanks, are you sure that the Hash code could help identify the objects without any contention?

    – Hopeless
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:40
















0












0








0








Firstly I'm afraid of the memory leak issue here. Because what I do is using some Dictionary to store the metadata with Key of the object itself. So I can lookup for metadata (which should be dynamic) by passing in the object.



Note that the object here does not have any GUID to help identify itself, the only way to identify it is by its instance.
This kind of storing looks much like what in DependencyObject in WPF. We can declare DependencyProperty (attached property) to extend the DependencyObject (the metadata is contained in the attached property).



Here is what I have:



Dictionary<object, SomeMetaData> _metadataLookup = new Dictionary<object,SomeMetaData>();
//to store metadata
_metadataLookup[someObject] = someMetaData;
//to get metadata
SomeMetaData someMetaData;
_metadataLookup.TryGetValue(someObject, out someMetaData);


It would be fine if the someObject's lifetime is the same as the lifetime of the scope using the _metadataLookup. But what if the someObject (after stored in _metadataLookup) should be destroyed (logically become unused)? We have to manually remove it from _metadataLookup as well, otherwise there is a memory leak there.



I'm seeking for a better solution for this issue, unexpectedly forgetting to remove the objects manually or simply not knowing when the objects should be removed is a problem here. Thanks.










share|improve this question














Firstly I'm afraid of the memory leak issue here. Because what I do is using some Dictionary to store the metadata with Key of the object itself. So I can lookup for metadata (which should be dynamic) by passing in the object.



Note that the object here does not have any GUID to help identify itself, the only way to identify it is by its instance.
This kind of storing looks much like what in DependencyObject in WPF. We can declare DependencyProperty (attached property) to extend the DependencyObject (the metadata is contained in the attached property).



Here is what I have:



Dictionary<object, SomeMetaData> _metadataLookup = new Dictionary<object,SomeMetaData>();
//to store metadata
_metadataLookup[someObject] = someMetaData;
//to get metadata
SomeMetaData someMetaData;
_metadataLookup.TryGetValue(someObject, out someMetaData);


It would be fine if the someObject's lifetime is the same as the lifetime of the scope using the _metadataLookup. But what if the someObject (after stored in _metadataLookup) should be destroyed (logically become unused)? We have to manually remove it from _metadataLookup as well, otherwise there is a memory leak there.



I'm seeking for a better solution for this issue, unexpectedly forgetting to remove the objects manually or simply not knowing when the objects should be removed is a problem here. Thanks.







c# caching memory-leaks metadata






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 21 '18 at 2:35









HopelessHopeless

1,91821729




1,91821729













  • Yeah storing the reference is probably not a good thing. however you could store the hashcode, though you will have to implement it properly

    – Michael Randall
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:39













  • @TheGeneral thanks, are you sure that the Hash code could help identify the objects without any contention?

    – Hopeless
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:40





















  • Yeah storing the reference is probably not a good thing. however you could store the hashcode, though you will have to implement it properly

    – Michael Randall
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:39













  • @TheGeneral thanks, are you sure that the Hash code could help identify the objects without any contention?

    – Hopeless
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:40



















Yeah storing the reference is probably not a good thing. however you could store the hashcode, though you will have to implement it properly

– Michael Randall
Nov 21 '18 at 2:39







Yeah storing the reference is probably not a good thing. however you could store the hashcode, though you will have to implement it properly

– Michael Randall
Nov 21 '18 at 2:39















@TheGeneral thanks, are you sure that the Hash code could help identify the objects without any contention?

– Hopeless
Nov 21 '18 at 2:40







@TheGeneral thanks, are you sure that the Hash code could help identify the objects without any contention?

– Hopeless
Nov 21 '18 at 2:40














1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7














For this purpose you can use ConditionalWeakTable



public class Example
{
public static void Main()
{
var mc1 = new ManagedClass();
var mc2 = new ManagedClass();
var mc3 = new ManagedClass();

var cwt = new ConditionalWeakTable<ManagedClass, ClassData>();
cwt.Add(mc1, new ClassData());
cwt.Add(mc2, new ClassData());
cwt.Add(mc3, new ClassData());

var wr2 = new WeakReference(mc2);
mc2 = null;

GC.Collect();

ClassData data = null;

if (wr2.Target == null)
Console.WriteLine("No strong reference to mc2 exists.");
else if (cwt.TryGetValue(mc2, out data))
Console.WriteLine("Data created at {0}", data.CreationTime);
else
Console.WriteLine("mc2 not found in the table.");
}
}

public class ManagedClass
{
}

public class ClassData
{
public DateTime CreationTime;
public object Data;

public ClassData()
{
CreationTime = DateTime.Now;
this.Data = new object();
}
}
// The example displays the following output:
// No strong reference to mc2 exists.





share|improve this answer
























  • I learn something new each day, upvote

    – Michael Randall
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:40













  • thank you for this, it looks like that the ConditionalWeakTable is a tool of compiler services. Is it fine to just use it in our own code? I'm afraid of its change in future. One more thing I would like to have here is some concurrent version of this ConditionalWeakTable? Yes actually in my scenario I may have to lookup for the data concurrently. Anyway this answer is great but I still leave this question open for a while. Thanks again.

    – Hopeless
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:55








  • 1





    @Hopeless, as docs said: Instances of the ConditionalWeakTable<TKey,TValue> class are thread safe. They do not require callers to do any additional locking.

    – vasily.sib
    Nov 21 '18 at 3:25











  • @Hopeless it's hard to tell, is it ok or not. But ConditionalWeakTable seems ok for situation you have described

    – Backs
    Nov 21 '18 at 6:46













  • thanks, at least I have no other way, maybe some look into the source code of WPF for implementation of DependencyObject and DependencyProperty will provide another solution.

    – Hopeless
    Nov 23 '18 at 3:04













Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53404550%2fthe-correct-way-to-store-some-metadata-associated-with-an-object%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7














For this purpose you can use ConditionalWeakTable



public class Example
{
public static void Main()
{
var mc1 = new ManagedClass();
var mc2 = new ManagedClass();
var mc3 = new ManagedClass();

var cwt = new ConditionalWeakTable<ManagedClass, ClassData>();
cwt.Add(mc1, new ClassData());
cwt.Add(mc2, new ClassData());
cwt.Add(mc3, new ClassData());

var wr2 = new WeakReference(mc2);
mc2 = null;

GC.Collect();

ClassData data = null;

if (wr2.Target == null)
Console.WriteLine("No strong reference to mc2 exists.");
else if (cwt.TryGetValue(mc2, out data))
Console.WriteLine("Data created at {0}", data.CreationTime);
else
Console.WriteLine("mc2 not found in the table.");
}
}

public class ManagedClass
{
}

public class ClassData
{
public DateTime CreationTime;
public object Data;

public ClassData()
{
CreationTime = DateTime.Now;
this.Data = new object();
}
}
// The example displays the following output:
// No strong reference to mc2 exists.





share|improve this answer
























  • I learn something new each day, upvote

    – Michael Randall
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:40













  • thank you for this, it looks like that the ConditionalWeakTable is a tool of compiler services. Is it fine to just use it in our own code? I'm afraid of its change in future. One more thing I would like to have here is some concurrent version of this ConditionalWeakTable? Yes actually in my scenario I may have to lookup for the data concurrently. Anyway this answer is great but I still leave this question open for a while. Thanks again.

    – Hopeless
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:55








  • 1





    @Hopeless, as docs said: Instances of the ConditionalWeakTable<TKey,TValue> class are thread safe. They do not require callers to do any additional locking.

    – vasily.sib
    Nov 21 '18 at 3:25











  • @Hopeless it's hard to tell, is it ok or not. But ConditionalWeakTable seems ok for situation you have described

    – Backs
    Nov 21 '18 at 6:46













  • thanks, at least I have no other way, maybe some look into the source code of WPF for implementation of DependencyObject and DependencyProperty will provide another solution.

    – Hopeless
    Nov 23 '18 at 3:04


















7














For this purpose you can use ConditionalWeakTable



public class Example
{
public static void Main()
{
var mc1 = new ManagedClass();
var mc2 = new ManagedClass();
var mc3 = new ManagedClass();

var cwt = new ConditionalWeakTable<ManagedClass, ClassData>();
cwt.Add(mc1, new ClassData());
cwt.Add(mc2, new ClassData());
cwt.Add(mc3, new ClassData());

var wr2 = new WeakReference(mc2);
mc2 = null;

GC.Collect();

ClassData data = null;

if (wr2.Target == null)
Console.WriteLine("No strong reference to mc2 exists.");
else if (cwt.TryGetValue(mc2, out data))
Console.WriteLine("Data created at {0}", data.CreationTime);
else
Console.WriteLine("mc2 not found in the table.");
}
}

public class ManagedClass
{
}

public class ClassData
{
public DateTime CreationTime;
public object Data;

public ClassData()
{
CreationTime = DateTime.Now;
this.Data = new object();
}
}
// The example displays the following output:
// No strong reference to mc2 exists.





share|improve this answer
























  • I learn something new each day, upvote

    – Michael Randall
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:40













  • thank you for this, it looks like that the ConditionalWeakTable is a tool of compiler services. Is it fine to just use it in our own code? I'm afraid of its change in future. One more thing I would like to have here is some concurrent version of this ConditionalWeakTable? Yes actually in my scenario I may have to lookup for the data concurrently. Anyway this answer is great but I still leave this question open for a while. Thanks again.

    – Hopeless
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:55








  • 1





    @Hopeless, as docs said: Instances of the ConditionalWeakTable<TKey,TValue> class are thread safe. They do not require callers to do any additional locking.

    – vasily.sib
    Nov 21 '18 at 3:25











  • @Hopeless it's hard to tell, is it ok or not. But ConditionalWeakTable seems ok for situation you have described

    – Backs
    Nov 21 '18 at 6:46













  • thanks, at least I have no other way, maybe some look into the source code of WPF for implementation of DependencyObject and DependencyProperty will provide another solution.

    – Hopeless
    Nov 23 '18 at 3:04
















7












7








7







For this purpose you can use ConditionalWeakTable



public class Example
{
public static void Main()
{
var mc1 = new ManagedClass();
var mc2 = new ManagedClass();
var mc3 = new ManagedClass();

var cwt = new ConditionalWeakTable<ManagedClass, ClassData>();
cwt.Add(mc1, new ClassData());
cwt.Add(mc2, new ClassData());
cwt.Add(mc3, new ClassData());

var wr2 = new WeakReference(mc2);
mc2 = null;

GC.Collect();

ClassData data = null;

if (wr2.Target == null)
Console.WriteLine("No strong reference to mc2 exists.");
else if (cwt.TryGetValue(mc2, out data))
Console.WriteLine("Data created at {0}", data.CreationTime);
else
Console.WriteLine("mc2 not found in the table.");
}
}

public class ManagedClass
{
}

public class ClassData
{
public DateTime CreationTime;
public object Data;

public ClassData()
{
CreationTime = DateTime.Now;
this.Data = new object();
}
}
// The example displays the following output:
// No strong reference to mc2 exists.





share|improve this answer













For this purpose you can use ConditionalWeakTable



public class Example
{
public static void Main()
{
var mc1 = new ManagedClass();
var mc2 = new ManagedClass();
var mc3 = new ManagedClass();

var cwt = new ConditionalWeakTable<ManagedClass, ClassData>();
cwt.Add(mc1, new ClassData());
cwt.Add(mc2, new ClassData());
cwt.Add(mc3, new ClassData());

var wr2 = new WeakReference(mc2);
mc2 = null;

GC.Collect();

ClassData data = null;

if (wr2.Target == null)
Console.WriteLine("No strong reference to mc2 exists.");
else if (cwt.TryGetValue(mc2, out data))
Console.WriteLine("Data created at {0}", data.CreationTime);
else
Console.WriteLine("mc2 not found in the table.");
}
}

public class ManagedClass
{
}

public class ClassData
{
public DateTime CreationTime;
public object Data;

public ClassData()
{
CreationTime = DateTime.Now;
this.Data = new object();
}
}
// The example displays the following output:
// No strong reference to mc2 exists.






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 21 '18 at 2:39









BacksBacks

19.2k33159




19.2k33159













  • I learn something new each day, upvote

    – Michael Randall
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:40













  • thank you for this, it looks like that the ConditionalWeakTable is a tool of compiler services. Is it fine to just use it in our own code? I'm afraid of its change in future. One more thing I would like to have here is some concurrent version of this ConditionalWeakTable? Yes actually in my scenario I may have to lookup for the data concurrently. Anyway this answer is great but I still leave this question open for a while. Thanks again.

    – Hopeless
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:55








  • 1





    @Hopeless, as docs said: Instances of the ConditionalWeakTable<TKey,TValue> class are thread safe. They do not require callers to do any additional locking.

    – vasily.sib
    Nov 21 '18 at 3:25











  • @Hopeless it's hard to tell, is it ok or not. But ConditionalWeakTable seems ok for situation you have described

    – Backs
    Nov 21 '18 at 6:46













  • thanks, at least I have no other way, maybe some look into the source code of WPF for implementation of DependencyObject and DependencyProperty will provide another solution.

    – Hopeless
    Nov 23 '18 at 3:04





















  • I learn something new each day, upvote

    – Michael Randall
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:40













  • thank you for this, it looks like that the ConditionalWeakTable is a tool of compiler services. Is it fine to just use it in our own code? I'm afraid of its change in future. One more thing I would like to have here is some concurrent version of this ConditionalWeakTable? Yes actually in my scenario I may have to lookup for the data concurrently. Anyway this answer is great but I still leave this question open for a while. Thanks again.

    – Hopeless
    Nov 21 '18 at 2:55








  • 1





    @Hopeless, as docs said: Instances of the ConditionalWeakTable<TKey,TValue> class are thread safe. They do not require callers to do any additional locking.

    – vasily.sib
    Nov 21 '18 at 3:25











  • @Hopeless it's hard to tell, is it ok or not. But ConditionalWeakTable seems ok for situation you have described

    – Backs
    Nov 21 '18 at 6:46













  • thanks, at least I have no other way, maybe some look into the source code of WPF for implementation of DependencyObject and DependencyProperty will provide another solution.

    – Hopeless
    Nov 23 '18 at 3:04



















I learn something new each day, upvote

– Michael Randall
Nov 21 '18 at 2:40







I learn something new each day, upvote

– Michael Randall
Nov 21 '18 at 2:40















thank you for this, it looks like that the ConditionalWeakTable is a tool of compiler services. Is it fine to just use it in our own code? I'm afraid of its change in future. One more thing I would like to have here is some concurrent version of this ConditionalWeakTable? Yes actually in my scenario I may have to lookup for the data concurrently. Anyway this answer is great but I still leave this question open for a while. Thanks again.

– Hopeless
Nov 21 '18 at 2:55







thank you for this, it looks like that the ConditionalWeakTable is a tool of compiler services. Is it fine to just use it in our own code? I'm afraid of its change in future. One more thing I would like to have here is some concurrent version of this ConditionalWeakTable? Yes actually in my scenario I may have to lookup for the data concurrently. Anyway this answer is great but I still leave this question open for a while. Thanks again.

– Hopeless
Nov 21 '18 at 2:55






1




1





@Hopeless, as docs said: Instances of the ConditionalWeakTable<TKey,TValue> class are thread safe. They do not require callers to do any additional locking.

– vasily.sib
Nov 21 '18 at 3:25





@Hopeless, as docs said: Instances of the ConditionalWeakTable<TKey,TValue> class are thread safe. They do not require callers to do any additional locking.

– vasily.sib
Nov 21 '18 at 3:25













@Hopeless it's hard to tell, is it ok or not. But ConditionalWeakTable seems ok for situation you have described

– Backs
Nov 21 '18 at 6:46







@Hopeless it's hard to tell, is it ok or not. But ConditionalWeakTable seems ok for situation you have described

– Backs
Nov 21 '18 at 6:46















thanks, at least I have no other way, maybe some look into the source code of WPF for implementation of DependencyObject and DependencyProperty will provide another solution.

– Hopeless
Nov 23 '18 at 3:04







thanks, at least I have no other way, maybe some look into the source code of WPF for implementation of DependencyObject and DependencyProperty will provide another solution.

– Hopeless
Nov 23 '18 at 3:04






















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53404550%2fthe-correct-way-to-store-some-metadata-associated-with-an-object%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

鏡平學校

ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?