ActiveMQ Failover transport over Spring Stomp Broker Relay





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







0















Did anyone succeeded using failover transport utilizing active/standby Active MQ (Amazon MQ to be precise) when configuring websocket stomp broker relay ?



I did create following TcpClient, but it implements round-robin algorithm over given endpoints, which causes some errors when actually standby instance is being selected:




Transport failure: epoll_ctl(..) failed: No such file or directory




Here's my current implementation:



public class StompTcpFactory implements NetStreams.TcpClientFactory<Message<byte>, Message<byte>> {
private final Environment environment = new Environment(new SynchronousDispatcherConfigReader());
private final List<URI> endpoints;
private final boolean isSsl;

public StompTcpFactory(List<String> endpoints) {
this.endpoints = endpoints.stream()
.map(e -> contains(e, "://") ? e : "fake://" + e)
.map(URI::create)
.collect(toList());
isSsl = this.endpoints.stream().anyMatch(StompTcpFactory::isSsl);

boolean anyNotSsl = this.endpoints.stream().anyMatch(not(StompTcpFactory::isSsl));
if (isSsl && anyNotSsl)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Cannot configure STOMP to use SSL and regular connections at the same time: " + endpoints);
}

@Override
public Spec.TcpClientSpec<Message<byte>, Message<byte>> apply(Spec.TcpClientSpec<Message<byte>, Message<byte>> tcpClientSpec) {
return tcpClientSpec
.env(environment)
.codec(new Reactor2StompCodec(new StompEncoder(), new StompDecoder()))
.ssl(isSsl ? new SslOptions() : null)
.connect(new InetSocketAddressSupplier(endpoints));
}

private static boolean isSsl(URI endpoint) {
return containsIgnoreCase(endpoint.getScheme(), "ssl");
}

private static class SynchronousDispatcherConfigReader implements ConfigurationReader {
@Override
public ReactorConfiguration read() {
return new ReactorConfiguration(emptyList(), "sync", new Properties());
}
}

}


with following supplier:



public class InetSocketAddressSupplier implements Supplier<InetSocketAddress> {

private static final AtomicInteger counter = new AtomicInteger(0);

private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(getClass());
private final List<URI> endpoints;

public InetSocketAddressSupplier(List<URI> endpoints) {
this.endpoints = endpoints;
}

@Override
public InetSocketAddress get() {
int endpointIndex = counter.getAndUpdate(i -> ++i % endpoints.size());
URI endpoint = endpoints.get(endpointIndex);

logger.info("nnConnecting to broker[{}]: {}:{}nn", endpointIndex, endpoint.getHost(), endpoint.getPort());
return new InetSocketAddress(endpoint.getHost(), endpoint.getPort());
}

}


And here's the broker configuration:



@Override
public void configureMessageBroker(MessageBrokerRegistry registry) {
String environment = configService.getString(ENVIRONMENT);

String user = configService.getString(WEBSOCKET_EXTERNAL_BROKER_USER);
String password = configService.getString(WEBSOCKET_EXTERNAL_BROKER_PASSWORD);
registry
.enableStompBrokerRelay("/queue", "/topic")
.setRelayHost(UNUSED_RELAY_HOST)
.setClientLogin(user)
.setClientPasscode(password)
.setSystemLogin(user)
.setSystemPasscode(password)
.setUserDestinationBroadcast(format("/topic/%s-unresolved-user-destination", environment))
.setUserRegistryBroadcast(format("/topic/%s-simp-user-registry", environment))
.setTcpClient(createTcpClient());

registry.setApplicationDestinationPrefixes(format("/%s-websocket-app", environment));
}


private TcpOperations<byte> createTcpClient() {
List<String> endpoints = asList(configService.getStringArray(WEBSOCKET_EXTERNAL_BROKER_ENDPOINTS));
logger.info("Configuring websocket brokers to: {}", endpoints);
return new Reactor2TcpClient<>(new StompTcpFactory(endpoints));
}









share|improve this question





























    0















    Did anyone succeeded using failover transport utilizing active/standby Active MQ (Amazon MQ to be precise) when configuring websocket stomp broker relay ?



    I did create following TcpClient, but it implements round-robin algorithm over given endpoints, which causes some errors when actually standby instance is being selected:




    Transport failure: epoll_ctl(..) failed: No such file or directory




    Here's my current implementation:



    public class StompTcpFactory implements NetStreams.TcpClientFactory<Message<byte>, Message<byte>> {
    private final Environment environment = new Environment(new SynchronousDispatcherConfigReader());
    private final List<URI> endpoints;
    private final boolean isSsl;

    public StompTcpFactory(List<String> endpoints) {
    this.endpoints = endpoints.stream()
    .map(e -> contains(e, "://") ? e : "fake://" + e)
    .map(URI::create)
    .collect(toList());
    isSsl = this.endpoints.stream().anyMatch(StompTcpFactory::isSsl);

    boolean anyNotSsl = this.endpoints.stream().anyMatch(not(StompTcpFactory::isSsl));
    if (isSsl && anyNotSsl)
    throw new IllegalArgumentException("Cannot configure STOMP to use SSL and regular connections at the same time: " + endpoints);
    }

    @Override
    public Spec.TcpClientSpec<Message<byte>, Message<byte>> apply(Spec.TcpClientSpec<Message<byte>, Message<byte>> tcpClientSpec) {
    return tcpClientSpec
    .env(environment)
    .codec(new Reactor2StompCodec(new StompEncoder(), new StompDecoder()))
    .ssl(isSsl ? new SslOptions() : null)
    .connect(new InetSocketAddressSupplier(endpoints));
    }

    private static boolean isSsl(URI endpoint) {
    return containsIgnoreCase(endpoint.getScheme(), "ssl");
    }

    private static class SynchronousDispatcherConfigReader implements ConfigurationReader {
    @Override
    public ReactorConfiguration read() {
    return new ReactorConfiguration(emptyList(), "sync", new Properties());
    }
    }

    }


    with following supplier:



    public class InetSocketAddressSupplier implements Supplier<InetSocketAddress> {

    private static final AtomicInteger counter = new AtomicInteger(0);

    private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(getClass());
    private final List<URI> endpoints;

    public InetSocketAddressSupplier(List<URI> endpoints) {
    this.endpoints = endpoints;
    }

    @Override
    public InetSocketAddress get() {
    int endpointIndex = counter.getAndUpdate(i -> ++i % endpoints.size());
    URI endpoint = endpoints.get(endpointIndex);

    logger.info("nnConnecting to broker[{}]: {}:{}nn", endpointIndex, endpoint.getHost(), endpoint.getPort());
    return new InetSocketAddress(endpoint.getHost(), endpoint.getPort());
    }

    }


    And here's the broker configuration:



    @Override
    public void configureMessageBroker(MessageBrokerRegistry registry) {
    String environment = configService.getString(ENVIRONMENT);

    String user = configService.getString(WEBSOCKET_EXTERNAL_BROKER_USER);
    String password = configService.getString(WEBSOCKET_EXTERNAL_BROKER_PASSWORD);
    registry
    .enableStompBrokerRelay("/queue", "/topic")
    .setRelayHost(UNUSED_RELAY_HOST)
    .setClientLogin(user)
    .setClientPasscode(password)
    .setSystemLogin(user)
    .setSystemPasscode(password)
    .setUserDestinationBroadcast(format("/topic/%s-unresolved-user-destination", environment))
    .setUserRegistryBroadcast(format("/topic/%s-simp-user-registry", environment))
    .setTcpClient(createTcpClient());

    registry.setApplicationDestinationPrefixes(format("/%s-websocket-app", environment));
    }


    private TcpOperations<byte> createTcpClient() {
    List<String> endpoints = asList(configService.getStringArray(WEBSOCKET_EXTERNAL_BROKER_ENDPOINTS));
    logger.info("Configuring websocket brokers to: {}", endpoints);
    return new Reactor2TcpClient<>(new StompTcpFactory(endpoints));
    }









    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      Did anyone succeeded using failover transport utilizing active/standby Active MQ (Amazon MQ to be precise) when configuring websocket stomp broker relay ?



      I did create following TcpClient, but it implements round-robin algorithm over given endpoints, which causes some errors when actually standby instance is being selected:




      Transport failure: epoll_ctl(..) failed: No such file or directory




      Here's my current implementation:



      public class StompTcpFactory implements NetStreams.TcpClientFactory<Message<byte>, Message<byte>> {
      private final Environment environment = new Environment(new SynchronousDispatcherConfigReader());
      private final List<URI> endpoints;
      private final boolean isSsl;

      public StompTcpFactory(List<String> endpoints) {
      this.endpoints = endpoints.stream()
      .map(e -> contains(e, "://") ? e : "fake://" + e)
      .map(URI::create)
      .collect(toList());
      isSsl = this.endpoints.stream().anyMatch(StompTcpFactory::isSsl);

      boolean anyNotSsl = this.endpoints.stream().anyMatch(not(StompTcpFactory::isSsl));
      if (isSsl && anyNotSsl)
      throw new IllegalArgumentException("Cannot configure STOMP to use SSL and regular connections at the same time: " + endpoints);
      }

      @Override
      public Spec.TcpClientSpec<Message<byte>, Message<byte>> apply(Spec.TcpClientSpec<Message<byte>, Message<byte>> tcpClientSpec) {
      return tcpClientSpec
      .env(environment)
      .codec(new Reactor2StompCodec(new StompEncoder(), new StompDecoder()))
      .ssl(isSsl ? new SslOptions() : null)
      .connect(new InetSocketAddressSupplier(endpoints));
      }

      private static boolean isSsl(URI endpoint) {
      return containsIgnoreCase(endpoint.getScheme(), "ssl");
      }

      private static class SynchronousDispatcherConfigReader implements ConfigurationReader {
      @Override
      public ReactorConfiguration read() {
      return new ReactorConfiguration(emptyList(), "sync", new Properties());
      }
      }

      }


      with following supplier:



      public class InetSocketAddressSupplier implements Supplier<InetSocketAddress> {

      private static final AtomicInteger counter = new AtomicInteger(0);

      private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(getClass());
      private final List<URI> endpoints;

      public InetSocketAddressSupplier(List<URI> endpoints) {
      this.endpoints = endpoints;
      }

      @Override
      public InetSocketAddress get() {
      int endpointIndex = counter.getAndUpdate(i -> ++i % endpoints.size());
      URI endpoint = endpoints.get(endpointIndex);

      logger.info("nnConnecting to broker[{}]: {}:{}nn", endpointIndex, endpoint.getHost(), endpoint.getPort());
      return new InetSocketAddress(endpoint.getHost(), endpoint.getPort());
      }

      }


      And here's the broker configuration:



      @Override
      public void configureMessageBroker(MessageBrokerRegistry registry) {
      String environment = configService.getString(ENVIRONMENT);

      String user = configService.getString(WEBSOCKET_EXTERNAL_BROKER_USER);
      String password = configService.getString(WEBSOCKET_EXTERNAL_BROKER_PASSWORD);
      registry
      .enableStompBrokerRelay("/queue", "/topic")
      .setRelayHost(UNUSED_RELAY_HOST)
      .setClientLogin(user)
      .setClientPasscode(password)
      .setSystemLogin(user)
      .setSystemPasscode(password)
      .setUserDestinationBroadcast(format("/topic/%s-unresolved-user-destination", environment))
      .setUserRegistryBroadcast(format("/topic/%s-simp-user-registry", environment))
      .setTcpClient(createTcpClient());

      registry.setApplicationDestinationPrefixes(format("/%s-websocket-app", environment));
      }


      private TcpOperations<byte> createTcpClient() {
      List<String> endpoints = asList(configService.getStringArray(WEBSOCKET_EXTERNAL_BROKER_ENDPOINTS));
      logger.info("Configuring websocket brokers to: {}", endpoints);
      return new Reactor2TcpClient<>(new StompTcpFactory(endpoints));
      }









      share|improve this question














      Did anyone succeeded using failover transport utilizing active/standby Active MQ (Amazon MQ to be precise) when configuring websocket stomp broker relay ?



      I did create following TcpClient, but it implements round-robin algorithm over given endpoints, which causes some errors when actually standby instance is being selected:




      Transport failure: epoll_ctl(..) failed: No such file or directory




      Here's my current implementation:



      public class StompTcpFactory implements NetStreams.TcpClientFactory<Message<byte>, Message<byte>> {
      private final Environment environment = new Environment(new SynchronousDispatcherConfigReader());
      private final List<URI> endpoints;
      private final boolean isSsl;

      public StompTcpFactory(List<String> endpoints) {
      this.endpoints = endpoints.stream()
      .map(e -> contains(e, "://") ? e : "fake://" + e)
      .map(URI::create)
      .collect(toList());
      isSsl = this.endpoints.stream().anyMatch(StompTcpFactory::isSsl);

      boolean anyNotSsl = this.endpoints.stream().anyMatch(not(StompTcpFactory::isSsl));
      if (isSsl && anyNotSsl)
      throw new IllegalArgumentException("Cannot configure STOMP to use SSL and regular connections at the same time: " + endpoints);
      }

      @Override
      public Spec.TcpClientSpec<Message<byte>, Message<byte>> apply(Spec.TcpClientSpec<Message<byte>, Message<byte>> tcpClientSpec) {
      return tcpClientSpec
      .env(environment)
      .codec(new Reactor2StompCodec(new StompEncoder(), new StompDecoder()))
      .ssl(isSsl ? new SslOptions() : null)
      .connect(new InetSocketAddressSupplier(endpoints));
      }

      private static boolean isSsl(URI endpoint) {
      return containsIgnoreCase(endpoint.getScheme(), "ssl");
      }

      private static class SynchronousDispatcherConfigReader implements ConfigurationReader {
      @Override
      public ReactorConfiguration read() {
      return new ReactorConfiguration(emptyList(), "sync", new Properties());
      }
      }

      }


      with following supplier:



      public class InetSocketAddressSupplier implements Supplier<InetSocketAddress> {

      private static final AtomicInteger counter = new AtomicInteger(0);

      private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(getClass());
      private final List<URI> endpoints;

      public InetSocketAddressSupplier(List<URI> endpoints) {
      this.endpoints = endpoints;
      }

      @Override
      public InetSocketAddress get() {
      int endpointIndex = counter.getAndUpdate(i -> ++i % endpoints.size());
      URI endpoint = endpoints.get(endpointIndex);

      logger.info("nnConnecting to broker[{}]: {}:{}nn", endpointIndex, endpoint.getHost(), endpoint.getPort());
      return new InetSocketAddress(endpoint.getHost(), endpoint.getPort());
      }

      }


      And here's the broker configuration:



      @Override
      public void configureMessageBroker(MessageBrokerRegistry registry) {
      String environment = configService.getString(ENVIRONMENT);

      String user = configService.getString(WEBSOCKET_EXTERNAL_BROKER_USER);
      String password = configService.getString(WEBSOCKET_EXTERNAL_BROKER_PASSWORD);
      registry
      .enableStompBrokerRelay("/queue", "/topic")
      .setRelayHost(UNUSED_RELAY_HOST)
      .setClientLogin(user)
      .setClientPasscode(password)
      .setSystemLogin(user)
      .setSystemPasscode(password)
      .setUserDestinationBroadcast(format("/topic/%s-unresolved-user-destination", environment))
      .setUserRegistryBroadcast(format("/topic/%s-simp-user-registry", environment))
      .setTcpClient(createTcpClient());

      registry.setApplicationDestinationPrefixes(format("/%s-websocket-app", environment));
      }


      private TcpOperations<byte> createTcpClient() {
      List<String> endpoints = asList(configService.getStringArray(WEBSOCKET_EXTERNAL_BROKER_ENDPOINTS));
      logger.info("Configuring websocket brokers to: {}", endpoints);
      return new Reactor2TcpClient<>(new StompTcpFactory(endpoints));
      }






      websocket activemq spring-websocket stomp java-websocket






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 22 '18 at 8:33









      emberember

      33




      33
























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53426755%2factivemq-failover-transport-over-spring-stomp-broker-relay%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53426755%2factivemq-failover-transport-over-spring-stomp-broker-relay%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          鏡平學校

          ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

          Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?