Counting a left join depending on other left join












-1















I have this query:



SELECT options.id, options.text, 
COUNT(options2.id) AS num_children
FROM options
JOIN history_uids AS uids
ON uids.uid = options.id
LEFT JOIN options AS options2
ON (options.id = options2.id_parent)
LEFT JOIN history_uids AS uids1
ON uids1.uid = options2.id
WHERE (
options.id = 25
AND (uids1.active = 1 OR
options2.id IS NULL) # Problem
)
GROUP BY `options`.`id`


There is an options table, and another, history_uids, which has a column named uid with the id of every options, and an active column set to 1 or 0.



I am expecting to get a result with:




  1. The ID and the text of the option which has the id 25, and which has active set to 1 in history_uids.

  2. The number of options which have an id_parent equal to the id (25) and for which active in history_uids is set to 1


So whatever is this number I should get my row if it has active set to 1. I cannot understand how to achieve this: I wanna set as last condition uids1.active = 1 OR "options2 doesn't exist", but to get this I should have my active condition in the ON of options2, which is not possible because at that moment the table history_uids is not yet referenced...



In my case the row has active set to 1 and has 5 children with active set to 0, so I should get my row with num_children set at 0. Instead whatever combination I do in the JOIN or the WHERE I get either num_children set to 5 or no result at all.



Thanks for your help (and for reading!)



Here is the full structure and data for testing:



CREATE TABLE `history_uids` (
`uid` int(10) NOT NULL,
`active` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '1'
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
INSERT INTO `history_uids` (`uid`, `active`) VALUES
(1, 1),
(2, 0),
(3, 0),
(4, 0),
(5, 0),
(6, 0);
CREATE TABLE `options` (
`id` int(10) NOT NULL,
`id_parent` int(10) DEFAULT NULL,
`text` varchar(255) NOT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
INSERT INTO `options` (`id`, `id_parent`, `text`) VALUES
(1, NULL, 'parent active'),
(2, 1, 'child 1 inactive'),
(3, 1, 'child 2 inactive'),
(4, 1, 'child 3 inactive'),
(5, 1, 'child 4 inactive'),
(6, 1, 'child 5 inactive');
ALTER TABLE `history_uids`
ADD PRIMARY KEY (`uid`);
ALTER TABLE `options`
ADD PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
ADD KEY `id_parent` (`id_parent`);
ALTER TABLE `options`
ADD CONSTRAINT `ibfk_3` FOREIGN KEY (`id_parent`) REFERENCES `options` (`id`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE,
ADD CONSTRAINT `ibfk_4` FOREIGN KEY (`id`) REFERENCES `history_uids` (`uid`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE;









share|improve this question

























  • See meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/333952/…

    – Strawberry
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:24






  • 1





    COUNT(options2.id) only counts non-null values, so the rows where options2.id IS NULL won't be counted.

    – Barmar
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:48











  • Can you show some example input and the desired result? I suspect what you need is two queries that you combine with UNION, but it's hard to understand your description.

    – Barmar
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:50











  • I have added structure and data if you want to test the query. The goal is to get the row with num_children set at 0 (as all child options have the corresponding history_uids.active set to 0)

    – Nabab
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:59











  • @Barmar I would like this as a result: {id: 1, text: 'parent active', num_children: 0}

    – Nabab
    Nov 21 '18 at 22:06
















-1















I have this query:



SELECT options.id, options.text, 
COUNT(options2.id) AS num_children
FROM options
JOIN history_uids AS uids
ON uids.uid = options.id
LEFT JOIN options AS options2
ON (options.id = options2.id_parent)
LEFT JOIN history_uids AS uids1
ON uids1.uid = options2.id
WHERE (
options.id = 25
AND (uids1.active = 1 OR
options2.id IS NULL) # Problem
)
GROUP BY `options`.`id`


There is an options table, and another, history_uids, which has a column named uid with the id of every options, and an active column set to 1 or 0.



I am expecting to get a result with:




  1. The ID and the text of the option which has the id 25, and which has active set to 1 in history_uids.

  2. The number of options which have an id_parent equal to the id (25) and for which active in history_uids is set to 1


So whatever is this number I should get my row if it has active set to 1. I cannot understand how to achieve this: I wanna set as last condition uids1.active = 1 OR "options2 doesn't exist", but to get this I should have my active condition in the ON of options2, which is not possible because at that moment the table history_uids is not yet referenced...



In my case the row has active set to 1 and has 5 children with active set to 0, so I should get my row with num_children set at 0. Instead whatever combination I do in the JOIN or the WHERE I get either num_children set to 5 or no result at all.



Thanks for your help (and for reading!)



Here is the full structure and data for testing:



CREATE TABLE `history_uids` (
`uid` int(10) NOT NULL,
`active` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '1'
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
INSERT INTO `history_uids` (`uid`, `active`) VALUES
(1, 1),
(2, 0),
(3, 0),
(4, 0),
(5, 0),
(6, 0);
CREATE TABLE `options` (
`id` int(10) NOT NULL,
`id_parent` int(10) DEFAULT NULL,
`text` varchar(255) NOT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
INSERT INTO `options` (`id`, `id_parent`, `text`) VALUES
(1, NULL, 'parent active'),
(2, 1, 'child 1 inactive'),
(3, 1, 'child 2 inactive'),
(4, 1, 'child 3 inactive'),
(5, 1, 'child 4 inactive'),
(6, 1, 'child 5 inactive');
ALTER TABLE `history_uids`
ADD PRIMARY KEY (`uid`);
ALTER TABLE `options`
ADD PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
ADD KEY `id_parent` (`id_parent`);
ALTER TABLE `options`
ADD CONSTRAINT `ibfk_3` FOREIGN KEY (`id_parent`) REFERENCES `options` (`id`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE,
ADD CONSTRAINT `ibfk_4` FOREIGN KEY (`id`) REFERENCES `history_uids` (`uid`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE;









share|improve this question

























  • See meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/333952/…

    – Strawberry
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:24






  • 1





    COUNT(options2.id) only counts non-null values, so the rows where options2.id IS NULL won't be counted.

    – Barmar
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:48











  • Can you show some example input and the desired result? I suspect what you need is two queries that you combine with UNION, but it's hard to understand your description.

    – Barmar
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:50











  • I have added structure and data if you want to test the query. The goal is to get the row with num_children set at 0 (as all child options have the corresponding history_uids.active set to 0)

    – Nabab
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:59











  • @Barmar I would like this as a result: {id: 1, text: 'parent active', num_children: 0}

    – Nabab
    Nov 21 '18 at 22:06














-1












-1








-1








I have this query:



SELECT options.id, options.text, 
COUNT(options2.id) AS num_children
FROM options
JOIN history_uids AS uids
ON uids.uid = options.id
LEFT JOIN options AS options2
ON (options.id = options2.id_parent)
LEFT JOIN history_uids AS uids1
ON uids1.uid = options2.id
WHERE (
options.id = 25
AND (uids1.active = 1 OR
options2.id IS NULL) # Problem
)
GROUP BY `options`.`id`


There is an options table, and another, history_uids, which has a column named uid with the id of every options, and an active column set to 1 or 0.



I am expecting to get a result with:




  1. The ID and the text of the option which has the id 25, and which has active set to 1 in history_uids.

  2. The number of options which have an id_parent equal to the id (25) and for which active in history_uids is set to 1


So whatever is this number I should get my row if it has active set to 1. I cannot understand how to achieve this: I wanna set as last condition uids1.active = 1 OR "options2 doesn't exist", but to get this I should have my active condition in the ON of options2, which is not possible because at that moment the table history_uids is not yet referenced...



In my case the row has active set to 1 and has 5 children with active set to 0, so I should get my row with num_children set at 0. Instead whatever combination I do in the JOIN or the WHERE I get either num_children set to 5 or no result at all.



Thanks for your help (and for reading!)



Here is the full structure and data for testing:



CREATE TABLE `history_uids` (
`uid` int(10) NOT NULL,
`active` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '1'
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
INSERT INTO `history_uids` (`uid`, `active`) VALUES
(1, 1),
(2, 0),
(3, 0),
(4, 0),
(5, 0),
(6, 0);
CREATE TABLE `options` (
`id` int(10) NOT NULL,
`id_parent` int(10) DEFAULT NULL,
`text` varchar(255) NOT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
INSERT INTO `options` (`id`, `id_parent`, `text`) VALUES
(1, NULL, 'parent active'),
(2, 1, 'child 1 inactive'),
(3, 1, 'child 2 inactive'),
(4, 1, 'child 3 inactive'),
(5, 1, 'child 4 inactive'),
(6, 1, 'child 5 inactive');
ALTER TABLE `history_uids`
ADD PRIMARY KEY (`uid`);
ALTER TABLE `options`
ADD PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
ADD KEY `id_parent` (`id_parent`);
ALTER TABLE `options`
ADD CONSTRAINT `ibfk_3` FOREIGN KEY (`id_parent`) REFERENCES `options` (`id`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE,
ADD CONSTRAINT `ibfk_4` FOREIGN KEY (`id`) REFERENCES `history_uids` (`uid`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE;









share|improve this question
















I have this query:



SELECT options.id, options.text, 
COUNT(options2.id) AS num_children
FROM options
JOIN history_uids AS uids
ON uids.uid = options.id
LEFT JOIN options AS options2
ON (options.id = options2.id_parent)
LEFT JOIN history_uids AS uids1
ON uids1.uid = options2.id
WHERE (
options.id = 25
AND (uids1.active = 1 OR
options2.id IS NULL) # Problem
)
GROUP BY `options`.`id`


There is an options table, and another, history_uids, which has a column named uid with the id of every options, and an active column set to 1 or 0.



I am expecting to get a result with:




  1. The ID and the text of the option which has the id 25, and which has active set to 1 in history_uids.

  2. The number of options which have an id_parent equal to the id (25) and for which active in history_uids is set to 1


So whatever is this number I should get my row if it has active set to 1. I cannot understand how to achieve this: I wanna set as last condition uids1.active = 1 OR "options2 doesn't exist", but to get this I should have my active condition in the ON of options2, which is not possible because at that moment the table history_uids is not yet referenced...



In my case the row has active set to 1 and has 5 children with active set to 0, so I should get my row with num_children set at 0. Instead whatever combination I do in the JOIN or the WHERE I get either num_children set to 5 or no result at all.



Thanks for your help (and for reading!)



Here is the full structure and data for testing:



CREATE TABLE `history_uids` (
`uid` int(10) NOT NULL,
`active` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '1'
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
INSERT INTO `history_uids` (`uid`, `active`) VALUES
(1, 1),
(2, 0),
(3, 0),
(4, 0),
(5, 0),
(6, 0);
CREATE TABLE `options` (
`id` int(10) NOT NULL,
`id_parent` int(10) DEFAULT NULL,
`text` varchar(255) NOT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
INSERT INTO `options` (`id`, `id_parent`, `text`) VALUES
(1, NULL, 'parent active'),
(2, 1, 'child 1 inactive'),
(3, 1, 'child 2 inactive'),
(4, 1, 'child 3 inactive'),
(5, 1, 'child 4 inactive'),
(6, 1, 'child 5 inactive');
ALTER TABLE `history_uids`
ADD PRIMARY KEY (`uid`);
ALTER TABLE `options`
ADD PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
ADD KEY `id_parent` (`id_parent`);
ALTER TABLE `options`
ADD CONSTRAINT `ibfk_3` FOREIGN KEY (`id_parent`) REFERENCES `options` (`id`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE,
ADD CONSTRAINT `ibfk_4` FOREIGN KEY (`id`) REFERENCES `history_uids` (`uid`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE;






mysql sql






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 21 '18 at 20:04







Nabab

















asked Nov 21 '18 at 19:19









NababNabab

2,0581426




2,0581426













  • See meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/333952/…

    – Strawberry
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:24






  • 1





    COUNT(options2.id) only counts non-null values, so the rows where options2.id IS NULL won't be counted.

    – Barmar
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:48











  • Can you show some example input and the desired result? I suspect what you need is two queries that you combine with UNION, but it's hard to understand your description.

    – Barmar
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:50











  • I have added structure and data if you want to test the query. The goal is to get the row with num_children set at 0 (as all child options have the corresponding history_uids.active set to 0)

    – Nabab
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:59











  • @Barmar I would like this as a result: {id: 1, text: 'parent active', num_children: 0}

    – Nabab
    Nov 21 '18 at 22:06



















  • See meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/333952/…

    – Strawberry
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:24






  • 1





    COUNT(options2.id) only counts non-null values, so the rows where options2.id IS NULL won't be counted.

    – Barmar
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:48











  • Can you show some example input and the desired result? I suspect what you need is two queries that you combine with UNION, but it's hard to understand your description.

    – Barmar
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:50











  • I have added structure and data if you want to test the query. The goal is to get the row with num_children set at 0 (as all child options have the corresponding history_uids.active set to 0)

    – Nabab
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:59











  • @Barmar I would like this as a result: {id: 1, text: 'parent active', num_children: 0}

    – Nabab
    Nov 21 '18 at 22:06

















See meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/333952/…

– Strawberry
Nov 21 '18 at 19:24





See meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/333952/…

– Strawberry
Nov 21 '18 at 19:24




1




1





COUNT(options2.id) only counts non-null values, so the rows where options2.id IS NULL won't be counted.

– Barmar
Nov 21 '18 at 19:48





COUNT(options2.id) only counts non-null values, so the rows where options2.id IS NULL won't be counted.

– Barmar
Nov 21 '18 at 19:48













Can you show some example input and the desired result? I suspect what you need is two queries that you combine with UNION, but it's hard to understand your description.

– Barmar
Nov 21 '18 at 19:50





Can you show some example input and the desired result? I suspect what you need is two queries that you combine with UNION, but it's hard to understand your description.

– Barmar
Nov 21 '18 at 19:50













I have added structure and data if you want to test the query. The goal is to get the row with num_children set at 0 (as all child options have the corresponding history_uids.active set to 0)

– Nabab
Nov 21 '18 at 19:59





I have added structure and data if you want to test the query. The goal is to get the row with num_children set at 0 (as all child options have the corresponding history_uids.active set to 0)

– Nabab
Nov 21 '18 at 19:59













@Barmar I would like this as a result: {id: 1, text: 'parent active', num_children: 0}

– Nabab
Nov 21 '18 at 22:06





@Barmar I would like this as a result: {id: 1, text: 'parent active', num_children: 0}

– Nabab
Nov 21 '18 at 22:06












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














You need to put the active test for the child row into the ON clause, so that inactive rows will be filtered out of the LEFT JOIN. And you should be counting uids1.uid, not options2.id, since the inactive rows aren't filtered out until you join with uids1.



SELECT options.id, options.text, 
COUNT(uids1.uid) AS num_children
FROM options
JOIN history_uids AS uids
ON uids.uid = options.id
LEFT JOIN options AS options2
ON (options.id = options2.id_parent)
LEFT JOIN history_uids AS uids1
ON uids1.uid = options2.id and uids1.active = 1
WHERE
uids.active = 1
GROUP BY `options`.`id`


DEMO






share|improve this answer
























  • Thanks a lot, I wanted to keep my count as it was but your solution counting the uids helped me found what I wanted: I added another join on the same table before and counted my original join with your last condition: ON uids1.uid = options2.id and uids1.active = 1

    – Nabab
    Nov 22 '18 at 4:02












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53419145%2fcounting-a-left-join-depending-on-other-left-join%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














You need to put the active test for the child row into the ON clause, so that inactive rows will be filtered out of the LEFT JOIN. And you should be counting uids1.uid, not options2.id, since the inactive rows aren't filtered out until you join with uids1.



SELECT options.id, options.text, 
COUNT(uids1.uid) AS num_children
FROM options
JOIN history_uids AS uids
ON uids.uid = options.id
LEFT JOIN options AS options2
ON (options.id = options2.id_parent)
LEFT JOIN history_uids AS uids1
ON uids1.uid = options2.id and uids1.active = 1
WHERE
uids.active = 1
GROUP BY `options`.`id`


DEMO






share|improve this answer
























  • Thanks a lot, I wanted to keep my count as it was but your solution counting the uids helped me found what I wanted: I added another join on the same table before and counted my original join with your last condition: ON uids1.uid = options2.id and uids1.active = 1

    – Nabab
    Nov 22 '18 at 4:02
















1














You need to put the active test for the child row into the ON clause, so that inactive rows will be filtered out of the LEFT JOIN. And you should be counting uids1.uid, not options2.id, since the inactive rows aren't filtered out until you join with uids1.



SELECT options.id, options.text, 
COUNT(uids1.uid) AS num_children
FROM options
JOIN history_uids AS uids
ON uids.uid = options.id
LEFT JOIN options AS options2
ON (options.id = options2.id_parent)
LEFT JOIN history_uids AS uids1
ON uids1.uid = options2.id and uids1.active = 1
WHERE
uids.active = 1
GROUP BY `options`.`id`


DEMO






share|improve this answer
























  • Thanks a lot, I wanted to keep my count as it was but your solution counting the uids helped me found what I wanted: I added another join on the same table before and counted my original join with your last condition: ON uids1.uid = options2.id and uids1.active = 1

    – Nabab
    Nov 22 '18 at 4:02














1












1








1







You need to put the active test for the child row into the ON clause, so that inactive rows will be filtered out of the LEFT JOIN. And you should be counting uids1.uid, not options2.id, since the inactive rows aren't filtered out until you join with uids1.



SELECT options.id, options.text, 
COUNT(uids1.uid) AS num_children
FROM options
JOIN history_uids AS uids
ON uids.uid = options.id
LEFT JOIN options AS options2
ON (options.id = options2.id_parent)
LEFT JOIN history_uids AS uids1
ON uids1.uid = options2.id and uids1.active = 1
WHERE
uids.active = 1
GROUP BY `options`.`id`


DEMO






share|improve this answer













You need to put the active test for the child row into the ON clause, so that inactive rows will be filtered out of the LEFT JOIN. And you should be counting uids1.uid, not options2.id, since the inactive rows aren't filtered out until you join with uids1.



SELECT options.id, options.text, 
COUNT(uids1.uid) AS num_children
FROM options
JOIN history_uids AS uids
ON uids.uid = options.id
LEFT JOIN options AS options2
ON (options.id = options2.id_parent)
LEFT JOIN history_uids AS uids1
ON uids1.uid = options2.id and uids1.active = 1
WHERE
uids.active = 1
GROUP BY `options`.`id`


DEMO







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 21 '18 at 22:22









BarmarBarmar

434k36259362




434k36259362













  • Thanks a lot, I wanted to keep my count as it was but your solution counting the uids helped me found what I wanted: I added another join on the same table before and counted my original join with your last condition: ON uids1.uid = options2.id and uids1.active = 1

    – Nabab
    Nov 22 '18 at 4:02



















  • Thanks a lot, I wanted to keep my count as it was but your solution counting the uids helped me found what I wanted: I added another join on the same table before and counted my original join with your last condition: ON uids1.uid = options2.id and uids1.active = 1

    – Nabab
    Nov 22 '18 at 4:02

















Thanks a lot, I wanted to keep my count as it was but your solution counting the uids helped me found what I wanted: I added another join on the same table before and counted my original join with your last condition: ON uids1.uid = options2.id and uids1.active = 1

– Nabab
Nov 22 '18 at 4:02





Thanks a lot, I wanted to keep my count as it was but your solution counting the uids helped me found what I wanted: I added another join on the same table before and counted my original join with your last condition: ON uids1.uid = options2.id and uids1.active = 1

– Nabab
Nov 22 '18 at 4:02




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53419145%2fcounting-a-left-join-depending-on-other-left-join%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

鏡平學校

ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?