PySpark apply same StringIndexer on multiple columns





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







3















I have the following Dataframe



+--------------+---------------+   
| SrcAddr| DstAddr|
+--------------+---------------+
| 192.168.100.5| 192.168.220.16|
| 192.168.100.5| 192.168.220.15|
|192.168.220.15| 192.168.100.5|
|192.168.220.16| 192.168.100.5|
| 192.168.100.5| 192.168.220.15|
|192.168.220.16| 192.168.100.5|
| 192.168.220.9| 192.168.100.5|
| 192.168.100.5| 192.168.220.9|
| 192.168.220.9| 192.168.100.5|
+--------------+---------------+


containing source and destination address IPs.
I want to transform them in numerical index by means of StringIndexer, but I want to learn a common mapping between the columns.



Unfortunately StringIndexer does not provide such a rich interface in PySpark. Thus I found a workaround, but I wanted to know if there is a better way to do it.



What I have done is the following:

First, I compute the union between the two columns



src_addr_df = df.select(["SrcAddr"]).withColumnRenamed("SrcAddr", "Addr")  
dst_addr_df = df.select(["DstAddr"]).withColumnRenamed("DstAddr", "Addr")
all_addr_df = src_addr_df.union(dst_addr_df)


Then, I learned a common StringIndexer over the newly created DataFrame:



addrIndexer = StringIndexer(inputCol="Addr", outputCol="AddrIdx")  
addrModel = addrIndexer.fit(all_addr_df)


Finally, I used the learned model to transform the original dataframe. This, is the tricky part because I need to rename the columns quite often to obtain the desired results:



df = addrModel.transform(df.withColumnRenamed("SrcAddr", "Addr")).withColumnRenamed("Addr", "SrcAddr").withColumnRenamed("AddrIdx", "SrcAddrIdx")

df = addrModel.transform(df.withColumnRenamed("DstAddr", "Addr")).withColumnRenamed("Addr", "DstAddr").withColumnRenamed("AddrIdx", "DstAddrIdx")


Thus, I'm wandering if there is the possibility to rather change the InputCol value of the StringIndexer, which would create a much readable code



Best regards,
Sandro










share|improve this question































    3















    I have the following Dataframe



    +--------------+---------------+   
    | SrcAddr| DstAddr|
    +--------------+---------------+
    | 192.168.100.5| 192.168.220.16|
    | 192.168.100.5| 192.168.220.15|
    |192.168.220.15| 192.168.100.5|
    |192.168.220.16| 192.168.100.5|
    | 192.168.100.5| 192.168.220.15|
    |192.168.220.16| 192.168.100.5|
    | 192.168.220.9| 192.168.100.5|
    | 192.168.100.5| 192.168.220.9|
    | 192.168.220.9| 192.168.100.5|
    +--------------+---------------+


    containing source and destination address IPs.
    I want to transform them in numerical index by means of StringIndexer, but I want to learn a common mapping between the columns.



    Unfortunately StringIndexer does not provide such a rich interface in PySpark. Thus I found a workaround, but I wanted to know if there is a better way to do it.



    What I have done is the following:

    First, I compute the union between the two columns



    src_addr_df = df.select(["SrcAddr"]).withColumnRenamed("SrcAddr", "Addr")  
    dst_addr_df = df.select(["DstAddr"]).withColumnRenamed("DstAddr", "Addr")
    all_addr_df = src_addr_df.union(dst_addr_df)


    Then, I learned a common StringIndexer over the newly created DataFrame:



    addrIndexer = StringIndexer(inputCol="Addr", outputCol="AddrIdx")  
    addrModel = addrIndexer.fit(all_addr_df)


    Finally, I used the learned model to transform the original dataframe. This, is the tricky part because I need to rename the columns quite often to obtain the desired results:



    df = addrModel.transform(df.withColumnRenamed("SrcAddr", "Addr")).withColumnRenamed("Addr", "SrcAddr").withColumnRenamed("AddrIdx", "SrcAddrIdx")

    df = addrModel.transform(df.withColumnRenamed("DstAddr", "Addr")).withColumnRenamed("Addr", "DstAddr").withColumnRenamed("AddrIdx", "DstAddrIdx")


    Thus, I'm wandering if there is the possibility to rather change the InputCol value of the StringIndexer, which would create a much readable code



    Best regards,
    Sandro










    share|improve this question



























      3












      3








      3








      I have the following Dataframe



      +--------------+---------------+   
      | SrcAddr| DstAddr|
      +--------------+---------------+
      | 192.168.100.5| 192.168.220.16|
      | 192.168.100.5| 192.168.220.15|
      |192.168.220.15| 192.168.100.5|
      |192.168.220.16| 192.168.100.5|
      | 192.168.100.5| 192.168.220.15|
      |192.168.220.16| 192.168.100.5|
      | 192.168.220.9| 192.168.100.5|
      | 192.168.100.5| 192.168.220.9|
      | 192.168.220.9| 192.168.100.5|
      +--------------+---------------+


      containing source and destination address IPs.
      I want to transform them in numerical index by means of StringIndexer, but I want to learn a common mapping between the columns.



      Unfortunately StringIndexer does not provide such a rich interface in PySpark. Thus I found a workaround, but I wanted to know if there is a better way to do it.



      What I have done is the following:

      First, I compute the union between the two columns



      src_addr_df = df.select(["SrcAddr"]).withColumnRenamed("SrcAddr", "Addr")  
      dst_addr_df = df.select(["DstAddr"]).withColumnRenamed("DstAddr", "Addr")
      all_addr_df = src_addr_df.union(dst_addr_df)


      Then, I learned a common StringIndexer over the newly created DataFrame:



      addrIndexer = StringIndexer(inputCol="Addr", outputCol="AddrIdx")  
      addrModel = addrIndexer.fit(all_addr_df)


      Finally, I used the learned model to transform the original dataframe. This, is the tricky part because I need to rename the columns quite often to obtain the desired results:



      df = addrModel.transform(df.withColumnRenamed("SrcAddr", "Addr")).withColumnRenamed("Addr", "SrcAddr").withColumnRenamed("AddrIdx", "SrcAddrIdx")

      df = addrModel.transform(df.withColumnRenamed("DstAddr", "Addr")).withColumnRenamed("Addr", "DstAddr").withColumnRenamed("AddrIdx", "DstAddrIdx")


      Thus, I'm wandering if there is the possibility to rather change the InputCol value of the StringIndexer, which would create a much readable code



      Best regards,
      Sandro










      share|improve this question
















      I have the following Dataframe



      +--------------+---------------+   
      | SrcAddr| DstAddr|
      +--------------+---------------+
      | 192.168.100.5| 192.168.220.16|
      | 192.168.100.5| 192.168.220.15|
      |192.168.220.15| 192.168.100.5|
      |192.168.220.16| 192.168.100.5|
      | 192.168.100.5| 192.168.220.15|
      |192.168.220.16| 192.168.100.5|
      | 192.168.220.9| 192.168.100.5|
      | 192.168.100.5| 192.168.220.9|
      | 192.168.220.9| 192.168.100.5|
      +--------------+---------------+


      containing source and destination address IPs.
      I want to transform them in numerical index by means of StringIndexer, but I want to learn a common mapping between the columns.



      Unfortunately StringIndexer does not provide such a rich interface in PySpark. Thus I found a workaround, but I wanted to know if there is a better way to do it.



      What I have done is the following:

      First, I compute the union between the two columns



      src_addr_df = df.select(["SrcAddr"]).withColumnRenamed("SrcAddr", "Addr")  
      dst_addr_df = df.select(["DstAddr"]).withColumnRenamed("DstAddr", "Addr")
      all_addr_df = src_addr_df.union(dst_addr_df)


      Then, I learned a common StringIndexer over the newly created DataFrame:



      addrIndexer = StringIndexer(inputCol="Addr", outputCol="AddrIdx")  
      addrModel = addrIndexer.fit(all_addr_df)


      Finally, I used the learned model to transform the original dataframe. This, is the tricky part because I need to rename the columns quite often to obtain the desired results:



      df = addrModel.transform(df.withColumnRenamed("SrcAddr", "Addr")).withColumnRenamed("Addr", "SrcAddr").withColumnRenamed("AddrIdx", "SrcAddrIdx")

      df = addrModel.transform(df.withColumnRenamed("DstAddr", "Addr")).withColumnRenamed("Addr", "DstAddr").withColumnRenamed("AddrIdx", "DstAddrIdx")


      Thus, I'm wandering if there is the possibility to rather change the InputCol value of the StringIndexer, which would create a much readable code



      Best regards,
      Sandro







      python dataframe pyspark






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 22 '18 at 8:43









      JoSSte

      1,07921833




      1,07921833










      asked Nov 22 '18 at 7:52









      Sandro CavallariSandro Cavallari

      164




      164
























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53426165%2fpyspark-apply-same-stringindexer-on-multiple-columns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53426165%2fpyspark-apply-same-stringindexer-on-multiple-columns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          鏡平學校

          ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

          Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?