Using contains text in page.execute_script





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







0















I am trying to click a div that contains "Some text". How can I do that using page.execute_script



What I tried:
page.execute_script("$div:contains('Some text')).click()")










share|improve this question





























    0















    I am trying to click a div that contains "Some text". How can I do that using page.execute_script



    What I tried:
    page.execute_script("$div:contains('Some text')).click()")










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      I am trying to click a div that contains "Some text". How can I do that using page.execute_script



      What I tried:
      page.execute_script("$div:contains('Some text')).click()")










      share|improve this question














      I am trying to click a div that contains "Some text". How can I do that using page.execute_script



      What I tried:
      page.execute_script("$div:contains('Some text')).click()")







      rspec capybara






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 22 '18 at 0:27









      A JA J

      5572721




      5572721
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          Why are you trying to do that from execute_script - what's wrong with just



          page.find('div', exact_text: 'Some text').click


          ? Obviously it would be more performant if you had some classes the div should have that could be added to the CSS selector too, but either way it's better than dropping to execute_script. If you really do need to use execute_script (I hope you're not testing a page since it would pretty much make your test worthless) then, assuming you're using JQuery (due to the $, and non standard :contains pseudo selector in your JS), it would be something like



          page.execute_script <<~JS
          $("div:contains('Some text')").click();
          JS


          although that is going to select all ancestor divs too, so may not click what you think it will






          share|improve this answer


























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53422301%2fusing-contains-text-in-page-execute-script%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            Why are you trying to do that from execute_script - what's wrong with just



            page.find('div', exact_text: 'Some text').click


            ? Obviously it would be more performant if you had some classes the div should have that could be added to the CSS selector too, but either way it's better than dropping to execute_script. If you really do need to use execute_script (I hope you're not testing a page since it would pretty much make your test worthless) then, assuming you're using JQuery (due to the $, and non standard :contains pseudo selector in your JS), it would be something like



            page.execute_script <<~JS
            $("div:contains('Some text')").click();
            JS


            although that is going to select all ancestor divs too, so may not click what you think it will






            share|improve this answer






























              0














              Why are you trying to do that from execute_script - what's wrong with just



              page.find('div', exact_text: 'Some text').click


              ? Obviously it would be more performant if you had some classes the div should have that could be added to the CSS selector too, but either way it's better than dropping to execute_script. If you really do need to use execute_script (I hope you're not testing a page since it would pretty much make your test worthless) then, assuming you're using JQuery (due to the $, and non standard :contains pseudo selector in your JS), it would be something like



              page.execute_script <<~JS
              $("div:contains('Some text')").click();
              JS


              although that is going to select all ancestor divs too, so may not click what you think it will






              share|improve this answer




























                0












                0








                0







                Why are you trying to do that from execute_script - what's wrong with just



                page.find('div', exact_text: 'Some text').click


                ? Obviously it would be more performant if you had some classes the div should have that could be added to the CSS selector too, but either way it's better than dropping to execute_script. If you really do need to use execute_script (I hope you're not testing a page since it would pretty much make your test worthless) then, assuming you're using JQuery (due to the $, and non standard :contains pseudo selector in your JS), it would be something like



                page.execute_script <<~JS
                $("div:contains('Some text')").click();
                JS


                although that is going to select all ancestor divs too, so may not click what you think it will






                share|improve this answer















                Why are you trying to do that from execute_script - what's wrong with just



                page.find('div', exact_text: 'Some text').click


                ? Obviously it would be more performant if you had some classes the div should have that could be added to the CSS selector too, but either way it's better than dropping to execute_script. If you really do need to use execute_script (I hope you're not testing a page since it would pretty much make your test worthless) then, assuming you're using JQuery (due to the $, and non standard :contains pseudo selector in your JS), it would be something like



                page.execute_script <<~JS
                $("div:contains('Some text')").click();
                JS


                although that is going to select all ancestor divs too, so may not click what you think it will







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Nov 22 '18 at 0:53

























                answered Nov 22 '18 at 0:48









                Thomas WalpoleThomas Walpole

                32k33153




                32k33153
































                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53422301%2fusing-contains-text-in-page-execute-script%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    鏡平學校

                    ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

                    Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?