What does these numbers really tell me and how to retest? Declining throughput in performance test under...
I have a case system where there are 230 people using it to handle claims. There has been a problem for a while that users claims the system works veeery slow in PROD. Our vendor dosen't understand it, and dosen't know how to performance test so I had to do it.I have been using Neoload on 3 computers for the test, and disabled any other software that could have disrupted the test.
The numbers I found using 150 users at the same time with randomized +35% think time, different cases in the request (random, so never the same(?)) and 70 users at the same setup as described with 150 users was:
Average Page response time: 4.3 s(70 users) to 12.3 s(150 users)
Average Request response time: 0.779 s (70 users) to 1.99 s(150 users)
Average throughput: 2,83mb/s(70 users) til 2,00mb/s (150 users)
To me this seems like the application under test dosen't scale well?
Pages that seems to fetch information in tables are the onces who uses the most time. I don't have access to the source code, and can only observe what the loadtest tells me.
I have added these graphs in case it makes it easier (Please disregard the 35 as it was 35 users running per machine x 2 = 70 users at once)
performance-testing neoload
add a comment |
I have a case system where there are 230 people using it to handle claims. There has been a problem for a while that users claims the system works veeery slow in PROD. Our vendor dosen't understand it, and dosen't know how to performance test so I had to do it.I have been using Neoload on 3 computers for the test, and disabled any other software that could have disrupted the test.
The numbers I found using 150 users at the same time with randomized +35% think time, different cases in the request (random, so never the same(?)) and 70 users at the same setup as described with 150 users was:
Average Page response time: 4.3 s(70 users) to 12.3 s(150 users)
Average Request response time: 0.779 s (70 users) to 1.99 s(150 users)
Average throughput: 2,83mb/s(70 users) til 2,00mb/s (150 users)
To me this seems like the application under test dosen't scale well?
Pages that seems to fetch information in tables are the onces who uses the most time. I don't have access to the source code, and can only observe what the loadtest tells me.
I have added these graphs in case it makes it easier (Please disregard the 35 as it was 35 users running per machine x 2 = 70 users at once)
performance-testing neoload
add a comment |
I have a case system where there are 230 people using it to handle claims. There has been a problem for a while that users claims the system works veeery slow in PROD. Our vendor dosen't understand it, and dosen't know how to performance test so I had to do it.I have been using Neoload on 3 computers for the test, and disabled any other software that could have disrupted the test.
The numbers I found using 150 users at the same time with randomized +35% think time, different cases in the request (random, so never the same(?)) and 70 users at the same setup as described with 150 users was:
Average Page response time: 4.3 s(70 users) to 12.3 s(150 users)
Average Request response time: 0.779 s (70 users) to 1.99 s(150 users)
Average throughput: 2,83mb/s(70 users) til 2,00mb/s (150 users)
To me this seems like the application under test dosen't scale well?
Pages that seems to fetch information in tables are the onces who uses the most time. I don't have access to the source code, and can only observe what the loadtest tells me.
I have added these graphs in case it makes it easier (Please disregard the 35 as it was 35 users running per machine x 2 = 70 users at once)
performance-testing neoload
I have a case system where there are 230 people using it to handle claims. There has been a problem for a while that users claims the system works veeery slow in PROD. Our vendor dosen't understand it, and dosen't know how to performance test so I had to do it.I have been using Neoload on 3 computers for the test, and disabled any other software that could have disrupted the test.
The numbers I found using 150 users at the same time with randomized +35% think time, different cases in the request (random, so never the same(?)) and 70 users at the same setup as described with 150 users was:
Average Page response time: 4.3 s(70 users) to 12.3 s(150 users)
Average Request response time: 0.779 s (70 users) to 1.99 s(150 users)
Average throughput: 2,83mb/s(70 users) til 2,00mb/s (150 users)
To me this seems like the application under test dosen't scale well?
Pages that seems to fetch information in tables are the onces who uses the most time. I don't have access to the source code, and can only observe what the loadtest tells me.
I have added these graphs in case it makes it easier (Please disregard the 35 as it was 35 users running per machine x 2 = 70 users at once)
performance-testing neoload
performance-testing neoload
edited Nov 19 '18 at 12:01
Ahmed Ashour
3,572102542
3,572102542
asked Nov 19 '18 at 12:01
Christian SennesvikChristian Sennesvik
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53374210%2fwhat-does-these-numbers-really-tell-me-and-how-to-retest-declining-throughput-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53374210%2fwhat-does-these-numbers-really-tell-me-and-how-to-retest-declining-throughput-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown