Resolve scoped registration
I have own small service bus. I send command, receive it and invoke handler. Handler I am resolving using small abstraction over any DI container -
public interface IDependencyContainer
{
object GetService(Type serviceType);
}
I need to use SimpleInjector as container.
public class DependencyContainer : IDependencyContainer
{
private readonly Container _container;
public DependencyContainer(Container container)
{
_container = container;
}
public object GetService(Type serviceType)
{
return _container.GetInstance(serviceType);
}
}
Handlers are registered as AsyncScopedLifestyle, so, when I receive message and try to get service like myDiImplementation.GetService(MyHandlerType) I got error
The MyHandler is registered as 'Async Scoped' lifestyle, but the instance is requested outside the context of an active (Async Scoped) scope
Docs give next example
using (AsyncScopedLifestyle.BeginScope(container)) {
var uow1 = container.GetInstance<IUnitOfWork>();
await SomeAsyncOperation();
var uow2 = container.GetInstance<IUnitOfWork>();
await SomeOtherAsyncOperation();
Assert.AreSame(uow1, uow2);
}
So, to be able invoke handler method I need to do it inside scope (in DependencyContainer as example). I dont know how to do it without any callbacks
in DependencyContainer. Any Ideas?
simple-injector
asked Nov 19 '18 at 12:07
Anton PutovAnton Putov
13
add a comment |
I have own small service bus. I send command, receive it and invoke handler. Handler I am resolving using small abstraction over any DI container -
public interface IDependencyContainer
{
object GetService(Type serviceType);
}
I need to use SimpleInjector as container.
public class DependencyContainer : IDependencyContainer
{
private readonly Container _container;
public DependencyContainer(Container container)
{
_container = container;
}
public object GetService(Type serviceType)
{
return _container.GetInstance(serviceType);
}
}
Handlers are registered as AsyncScopedLifestyle, so, when I receive message and try to get service like myDiImplementation.GetService(MyHandlerType) I got error
The MyHandler is registered as 'Async Scoped' lifestyle, but the instance is requested outside the context of an active (Async Scoped) scope
Docs give next example
using (AsyncScopedLifestyle.BeginScope(container)) {
var uow1 = container.GetInstance<IUnitOfWork>();
await SomeAsyncOperation();
var uow2 = container.GetInstance<IUnitOfWork>();
await SomeOtherAsyncOperation();
Assert.AreSame(uow1, uow2);
}
So, to be able invoke handler method I need to do it inside scope (in DependencyContainer as example). I dont know how to do it without any callbacks
in DependencyContainer. Any Ideas?
simple-injector
asked Nov 19 '18 at 12:07
Anton PutovAnton Putov
13
What you wish to accomplish, is not possible. You will either have to change your abstraction or apply scoping on a different level.
– Steven
Nov 19 '18 at 13:39
add a comment |
I have own small service bus. I send command, receive it and invoke handler. Handler I am resolving using small abstraction over any DI container -
public interface IDependencyContainer
{
object GetService(Type serviceType);
}
I need to use SimpleInjector as container.
public class DependencyContainer : IDependencyContainer
{
private readonly Container _container;
public DependencyContainer(Container container)
{
_container = container;
}
public object GetService(Type serviceType)
{
return _container.GetInstance(serviceType);
}
}
Handlers are registered as AsyncScopedLifestyle, so, when I receive message and try to get service like myDiImplementation.GetService(MyHandlerType) I got error
The MyHandler is registered as 'Async Scoped' lifestyle, but the instance is requested outside the context of an active (Async Scoped) scope
Docs give next example
using (AsyncScopedLifestyle.BeginScope(container)) {
var uow1 = container.GetInstance<IUnitOfWork>();
await SomeAsyncOperation();
var uow2 = container.GetInstance<IUnitOfWork>();
await SomeOtherAsyncOperation();
Assert.AreSame(uow1, uow2);
}
So, to be able invoke handler method I need to do it inside scope (in DependencyContainer as example). I dont know how to do it without any callbacks
in DependencyContainer. Any Ideas?
simple-injector
asked Nov 19 '18 at 12:07
Anton PutovAnton Putov
13
I have own small service bus. I send command, receive it and invoke handler. Handler I am resolving using small abstraction over any DI container -
public interface IDependencyContainer
{
object GetService(Type serviceType);
}
I need to use SimpleInjector as container.
public class DependencyContainer : IDependencyContainer
{
private readonly Container _container;
public DependencyContainer(Container container)
{
_container = container;
}
public object GetService(Type serviceType)
{
return _container.GetInstance(serviceType);
}
}
Handlers are registered as AsyncScopedLifestyle, so, when I receive message and try to get service like myDiImplementation.GetService(MyHandlerType) I got error
The MyHandler is registered as 'Async Scoped' lifestyle, but the instance is requested outside the context of an active (Async Scoped) scope
Docs give next example
using (AsyncScopedLifestyle.BeginScope(container)) {
var uow1 = container.GetInstance<IUnitOfWork>();
await SomeAsyncOperation();
var uow2 = container.GetInstance<IUnitOfWork>();
await SomeOtherAsyncOperation();
Assert.AreSame(uow1, uow2);
}
So, to be able invoke handler method I need to do it inside scope (in DependencyContainer as example). I dont know how to do it without any callbacks
in DependencyContainer. Any Ideas?
simple-injector
simple-injector
asked Nov 19 '18 at 12:07
Anton PutovAnton Putov
13
asked Nov 19 '18 at 12:07
Anton PutovAnton Putov
13
asked Nov 19 '18 at 12:07
Anton PutovAnton Putov
13
asked Nov 19 '18 at 12:07
Anton PutovAnton Putov
13
asked Nov 19 '18 at 12:07
Anton PutovAnton Putov
13
13
What you wish to accomplish, is not possible. You will either have to change your abstraction or apply scoping on a different level.
– Steven
Nov 19 '18 at 13:39
add a comment |
What you wish to accomplish, is not possible. You will either have to change your abstraction or apply scoping on a different level.
– Steven
Nov 19 '18 at 13:39
What you wish to accomplish, is not possible. You will either have to change your abstraction or apply scoping on a different level.
– Steven
Nov 19 '18 at 13:39
What you wish to accomplish, is not possible. You will either have to change your abstraction or apply scoping on a different level.
– Steven
Nov 19 '18 at 13:39
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53374313%2fresolve-scoped-registration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53374313%2fresolve-scoped-registration%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What you wish to accomplish, is not possible. You will either have to change your abstraction or apply scoping on a different level.
– Steven
Nov 19 '18 at 13:39