Rational points on a circle with centre as $(pi,e)$











up vote
9
down vote

favorite
5












What is the number of rational points on a circle having centre as $(pi,e)$?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 8




    Of what radius?
    – Richard Martin
    Nov 9 at 10:29






  • 7




    @KaviRamaMurthy There may be some: consider the circle with radius $sqrt{pi^2+e^2}$, which passes through the origin.
    – Michael Hoppe
    Nov 9 at 10:42






  • 1




    Fix a rationale point, then draw a circle passing for it. This show that there many circle containing at least one rational point. @michael show that tehre are ta most 2. Now assuming there are 2, and write down the equations for both, comapring them (since they have the same radius) you will obtain a rational equation involving $e$ and $pi$. The problem is that is still an opne problem if $e$ and $pi$ are algebrically independetly on $mathbb{Q}$...
    – ALG
    Nov 9 at 11:12








  • 2




    @ALG Both the question of whether $e+pi$ is rational and the question of whether they are algebraically independent are open. Therefore, any statement of intermediate strength (where the reductions are easy) should also be open. In particular, the question of whether $1,e$ and $pi$ are linearly independent should also be open.
    – alphacapture
    Nov 9 at 11:53






  • 1




    related (or duplicate) math.stackexchange.com/q/315761/114910
    – Burnsba
    Nov 9 at 14:15















up vote
9
down vote

favorite
5












What is the number of rational points on a circle having centre as $(pi,e)$?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 8




    Of what radius?
    – Richard Martin
    Nov 9 at 10:29






  • 7




    @KaviRamaMurthy There may be some: consider the circle with radius $sqrt{pi^2+e^2}$, which passes through the origin.
    – Michael Hoppe
    Nov 9 at 10:42






  • 1




    Fix a rationale point, then draw a circle passing for it. This show that there many circle containing at least one rational point. @michael show that tehre are ta most 2. Now assuming there are 2, and write down the equations for both, comapring them (since they have the same radius) you will obtain a rational equation involving $e$ and $pi$. The problem is that is still an opne problem if $e$ and $pi$ are algebrically independetly on $mathbb{Q}$...
    – ALG
    Nov 9 at 11:12








  • 2




    @ALG Both the question of whether $e+pi$ is rational and the question of whether they are algebraically independent are open. Therefore, any statement of intermediate strength (where the reductions are easy) should also be open. In particular, the question of whether $1,e$ and $pi$ are linearly independent should also be open.
    – alphacapture
    Nov 9 at 11:53






  • 1




    related (or duplicate) math.stackexchange.com/q/315761/114910
    – Burnsba
    Nov 9 at 14:15













up vote
9
down vote

favorite
5









up vote
9
down vote

favorite
5






5





What is the number of rational points on a circle having centre as $(pi,e)$?










share|cite|improve this question















What is the number of rational points on a circle having centre as $(pi,e)$?







geometry algebraic-geometry circle coordinate-systems






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 9 at 15:15









Brahadeesh

5,54041956




5,54041956










asked Nov 9 at 10:25









Madhav Nair

462




462








  • 8




    Of what radius?
    – Richard Martin
    Nov 9 at 10:29






  • 7




    @KaviRamaMurthy There may be some: consider the circle with radius $sqrt{pi^2+e^2}$, which passes through the origin.
    – Michael Hoppe
    Nov 9 at 10:42






  • 1




    Fix a rationale point, then draw a circle passing for it. This show that there many circle containing at least one rational point. @michael show that tehre are ta most 2. Now assuming there are 2, and write down the equations for both, comapring them (since they have the same radius) you will obtain a rational equation involving $e$ and $pi$. The problem is that is still an opne problem if $e$ and $pi$ are algebrically independetly on $mathbb{Q}$...
    – ALG
    Nov 9 at 11:12








  • 2




    @ALG Both the question of whether $e+pi$ is rational and the question of whether they are algebraically independent are open. Therefore, any statement of intermediate strength (where the reductions are easy) should also be open. In particular, the question of whether $1,e$ and $pi$ are linearly independent should also be open.
    – alphacapture
    Nov 9 at 11:53






  • 1




    related (or duplicate) math.stackexchange.com/q/315761/114910
    – Burnsba
    Nov 9 at 14:15














  • 8




    Of what radius?
    – Richard Martin
    Nov 9 at 10:29






  • 7




    @KaviRamaMurthy There may be some: consider the circle with radius $sqrt{pi^2+e^2}$, which passes through the origin.
    – Michael Hoppe
    Nov 9 at 10:42






  • 1




    Fix a rationale point, then draw a circle passing for it. This show that there many circle containing at least one rational point. @michael show that tehre are ta most 2. Now assuming there are 2, and write down the equations for both, comapring them (since they have the same radius) you will obtain a rational equation involving $e$ and $pi$. The problem is that is still an opne problem if $e$ and $pi$ are algebrically independetly on $mathbb{Q}$...
    – ALG
    Nov 9 at 11:12








  • 2




    @ALG Both the question of whether $e+pi$ is rational and the question of whether they are algebraically independent are open. Therefore, any statement of intermediate strength (where the reductions are easy) should also be open. In particular, the question of whether $1,e$ and $pi$ are linearly independent should also be open.
    – alphacapture
    Nov 9 at 11:53






  • 1




    related (or duplicate) math.stackexchange.com/q/315761/114910
    – Burnsba
    Nov 9 at 14:15








8




8




Of what radius?
– Richard Martin
Nov 9 at 10:29




Of what radius?
– Richard Martin
Nov 9 at 10:29




7




7




@KaviRamaMurthy There may be some: consider the circle with radius $sqrt{pi^2+e^2}$, which passes through the origin.
– Michael Hoppe
Nov 9 at 10:42




@KaviRamaMurthy There may be some: consider the circle with radius $sqrt{pi^2+e^2}$, which passes through the origin.
– Michael Hoppe
Nov 9 at 10:42




1




1




Fix a rationale point, then draw a circle passing for it. This show that there many circle containing at least one rational point. @michael show that tehre are ta most 2. Now assuming there are 2, and write down the equations for both, comapring them (since they have the same radius) you will obtain a rational equation involving $e$ and $pi$. The problem is that is still an opne problem if $e$ and $pi$ are algebrically independetly on $mathbb{Q}$...
– ALG
Nov 9 at 11:12






Fix a rationale point, then draw a circle passing for it. This show that there many circle containing at least one rational point. @michael show that tehre are ta most 2. Now assuming there are 2, and write down the equations for both, comapring them (since they have the same radius) you will obtain a rational equation involving $e$ and $pi$. The problem is that is still an opne problem if $e$ and $pi$ are algebrically independetly on $mathbb{Q}$...
– ALG
Nov 9 at 11:12






2




2




@ALG Both the question of whether $e+pi$ is rational and the question of whether they are algebraically independent are open. Therefore, any statement of intermediate strength (where the reductions are easy) should also be open. In particular, the question of whether $1,e$ and $pi$ are linearly independent should also be open.
– alphacapture
Nov 9 at 11:53




@ALG Both the question of whether $e+pi$ is rational and the question of whether they are algebraically independent are open. Therefore, any statement of intermediate strength (where the reductions are easy) should also be open. In particular, the question of whether $1,e$ and $pi$ are linearly independent should also be open.
– alphacapture
Nov 9 at 11:53




1




1




related (or duplicate) math.stackexchange.com/q/315761/114910
– Burnsba
Nov 9 at 14:15




related (or duplicate) math.stackexchange.com/q/315761/114910
– Burnsba
Nov 9 at 14:15










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
27
down vote













At most $2$: if there were three points with rational coordinates, the center would have rational coordinates, too.



Proof: let $A$, $B$ and $C$ be points on a circle with rational coordinates. The center $M$ of the circle passing through these points is the intersection of the perpendicular bisectors of $AB$ and $AC$. Now the equations of those bisectors contain only rational coefficients.



Solving that linear system, Cramer’s rule, for example, reveals that their intersection has rational coefficients, too.



Addendum: There are circles with irrational coordinates of the centre, which have two rational points on it. Take two points with rational coordinates; the equation of their perpendicular bisector has rational coefficients, hence surely there are irrational points on that bisector.



Example:
$$(x-1/2-sqrt2)^2+(y-1/2+sqrt2)^2=(1/2+sqrt2)^2
+(1/2-sqrt2)^2.$$

Obviously $(0,0)$ and $(1,1)$ belong to that circle.






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    13
    down vote













    As comments imply, it is possible to have a point on the circle, and the other answer implies we can't have three. Let me complement this by saying that existence of a circle with this center with two rational points is an open problem.



    Indeed, two points $P,Q$ lie on some circle centered at $(e,pi)$ iff this point lies on the perpendicular bisector of the interval $PQ$. This line has an equation with rational coefficients, and conversely every line with rational coefficients is a bisector of some segment with rational endpoints. Therefore two points can lie on such a circle iff we can have a rational solution to the equation $ae+bpi+c=0$. This, as you can imagine, is widely believed to not be possible, but it's still open - indeed, we don't even know whether $e/pi$ is rational, and if it were, we could even have a relation above with $c=0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • There should be another reason. It can easily be shown that the only point with rational coordinates on the circle centered in $(sqrt2,sqrt2)$ with radius $2$ is the origin.
      – Michael Hoppe
      Nov 9 at 12:06








    • 5




      @MichaelHoppe We know much more about how $sqrt 2$ behaves algebraically in relation to the rational numbers than we do $pi$ and $e$.
      – Arthur
      Nov 9 at 12:07










    • @MichaelHoppe A given point $c$ belongs to a line with rational coefficients if and only if some circle with centre $r$ includes at least two rational points. (Proof of the left-to-right implication: take a circle going through any rational point not on the line; then the mirror image of the point also belongs to the circle.) However, it is crucial here that the radius of the circle is not fixed. Almost all circles with a given centre actually contain no rational points at all.
      – Emil Jeřábek
      Nov 9 at 12:25








    • 1




      @EmilJeřábek Also, I think your comment is the first mention on this page of the fact that there exist circles with center $(pi,e)$ with no rational points on them.
      – Jeppe Stig Nielsen
      Nov 9 at 14:00


















    up vote
    6
    down vote













    There is at most one rational point on that circle, assuming $pi, e$ and $1$ are linearly independent over $Bbb Q$ (which seems to be an open problem).



    A rational point $(p, q)$ on the circle means that there is a real number $r$ such that
    $$
    (p-pi)^2 + (q-e)^2 = r^2
    $$

    If there is another rational point $(s, t)$ on that same circle, then we also have
    $$
    (s-pi)^2 + (t-e)^2 = r^2
    $$

    giving us
    $$
    (p-pi)^2 + (q-e)^2 =(s-pi)^2 + (t-e)^2\
    underbrace{(2s-2p)pi}_{text{rational multiple of }pi} + underbrace{(2t-2q)e}_{text{rational multiple of }e} + underbrace{p^2 - s^2 + q^2 - t^2}_{text{rational multiple of }1} = 0
    $$

    That the two points are distinct implies the three braced terms are not all zero, meaning $pi, e$ and $1$ are linearly dependent over $Bbb Q$.






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 1




      Related: math.stackexchange.com/a/832636/114910
      – Burnsba
      Nov 9 at 14:14











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2991207%2frational-points-on-a-circle-with-centre-as-pi-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    27
    down vote













    At most $2$: if there were three points with rational coordinates, the center would have rational coordinates, too.



    Proof: let $A$, $B$ and $C$ be points on a circle with rational coordinates. The center $M$ of the circle passing through these points is the intersection of the perpendicular bisectors of $AB$ and $AC$. Now the equations of those bisectors contain only rational coefficients.



    Solving that linear system, Cramer’s rule, for example, reveals that their intersection has rational coefficients, too.



    Addendum: There are circles with irrational coordinates of the centre, which have two rational points on it. Take two points with rational coordinates; the equation of their perpendicular bisector has rational coefficients, hence surely there are irrational points on that bisector.



    Example:
    $$(x-1/2-sqrt2)^2+(y-1/2+sqrt2)^2=(1/2+sqrt2)^2
    +(1/2-sqrt2)^2.$$

    Obviously $(0,0)$ and $(1,1)$ belong to that circle.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      27
      down vote













      At most $2$: if there were three points with rational coordinates, the center would have rational coordinates, too.



      Proof: let $A$, $B$ and $C$ be points on a circle with rational coordinates. The center $M$ of the circle passing through these points is the intersection of the perpendicular bisectors of $AB$ and $AC$. Now the equations of those bisectors contain only rational coefficients.



      Solving that linear system, Cramer’s rule, for example, reveals that their intersection has rational coefficients, too.



      Addendum: There are circles with irrational coordinates of the centre, which have two rational points on it. Take two points with rational coordinates; the equation of their perpendicular bisector has rational coefficients, hence surely there are irrational points on that bisector.



      Example:
      $$(x-1/2-sqrt2)^2+(y-1/2+sqrt2)^2=(1/2+sqrt2)^2
      +(1/2-sqrt2)^2.$$

      Obviously $(0,0)$ and $(1,1)$ belong to that circle.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        27
        down vote










        up vote
        27
        down vote









        At most $2$: if there were three points with rational coordinates, the center would have rational coordinates, too.



        Proof: let $A$, $B$ and $C$ be points on a circle with rational coordinates. The center $M$ of the circle passing through these points is the intersection of the perpendicular bisectors of $AB$ and $AC$. Now the equations of those bisectors contain only rational coefficients.



        Solving that linear system, Cramer’s rule, for example, reveals that their intersection has rational coefficients, too.



        Addendum: There are circles with irrational coordinates of the centre, which have two rational points on it. Take two points with rational coordinates; the equation of their perpendicular bisector has rational coefficients, hence surely there are irrational points on that bisector.



        Example:
        $$(x-1/2-sqrt2)^2+(y-1/2+sqrt2)^2=(1/2+sqrt2)^2
        +(1/2-sqrt2)^2.$$

        Obviously $(0,0)$ and $(1,1)$ belong to that circle.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        At most $2$: if there were three points with rational coordinates, the center would have rational coordinates, too.



        Proof: let $A$, $B$ and $C$ be points on a circle with rational coordinates. The center $M$ of the circle passing through these points is the intersection of the perpendicular bisectors of $AB$ and $AC$. Now the equations of those bisectors contain only rational coefficients.



        Solving that linear system, Cramer’s rule, for example, reveals that their intersection has rational coefficients, too.



        Addendum: There are circles with irrational coordinates of the centre, which have two rational points on it. Take two points with rational coordinates; the equation of their perpendicular bisector has rational coefficients, hence surely there are irrational points on that bisector.



        Example:
        $$(x-1/2-sqrt2)^2+(y-1/2+sqrt2)^2=(1/2+sqrt2)^2
        +(1/2-sqrt2)^2.$$

        Obviously $(0,0)$ and $(1,1)$ belong to that circle.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 9 at 20:05

























        answered Nov 9 at 10:31









        Michael Hoppe

        10.6k31733




        10.6k31733






















            up vote
            13
            down vote













            As comments imply, it is possible to have a point on the circle, and the other answer implies we can't have three. Let me complement this by saying that existence of a circle with this center with two rational points is an open problem.



            Indeed, two points $P,Q$ lie on some circle centered at $(e,pi)$ iff this point lies on the perpendicular bisector of the interval $PQ$. This line has an equation with rational coefficients, and conversely every line with rational coefficients is a bisector of some segment with rational endpoints. Therefore two points can lie on such a circle iff we can have a rational solution to the equation $ae+bpi+c=0$. This, as you can imagine, is widely believed to not be possible, but it's still open - indeed, we don't even know whether $e/pi$ is rational, and if it were, we could even have a relation above with $c=0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • There should be another reason. It can easily be shown that the only point with rational coordinates on the circle centered in $(sqrt2,sqrt2)$ with radius $2$ is the origin.
              – Michael Hoppe
              Nov 9 at 12:06








            • 5




              @MichaelHoppe We know much more about how $sqrt 2$ behaves algebraically in relation to the rational numbers than we do $pi$ and $e$.
              – Arthur
              Nov 9 at 12:07










            • @MichaelHoppe A given point $c$ belongs to a line with rational coefficients if and only if some circle with centre $r$ includes at least two rational points. (Proof of the left-to-right implication: take a circle going through any rational point not on the line; then the mirror image of the point also belongs to the circle.) However, it is crucial here that the radius of the circle is not fixed. Almost all circles with a given centre actually contain no rational points at all.
              – Emil Jeřábek
              Nov 9 at 12:25








            • 1




              @EmilJeřábek Also, I think your comment is the first mention on this page of the fact that there exist circles with center $(pi,e)$ with no rational points on them.
              – Jeppe Stig Nielsen
              Nov 9 at 14:00















            up vote
            13
            down vote













            As comments imply, it is possible to have a point on the circle, and the other answer implies we can't have three. Let me complement this by saying that existence of a circle with this center with two rational points is an open problem.



            Indeed, two points $P,Q$ lie on some circle centered at $(e,pi)$ iff this point lies on the perpendicular bisector of the interval $PQ$. This line has an equation with rational coefficients, and conversely every line with rational coefficients is a bisector of some segment with rational endpoints. Therefore two points can lie on such a circle iff we can have a rational solution to the equation $ae+bpi+c=0$. This, as you can imagine, is widely believed to not be possible, but it's still open - indeed, we don't even know whether $e/pi$ is rational, and if it were, we could even have a relation above with $c=0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • There should be another reason. It can easily be shown that the only point with rational coordinates on the circle centered in $(sqrt2,sqrt2)$ with radius $2$ is the origin.
              – Michael Hoppe
              Nov 9 at 12:06








            • 5




              @MichaelHoppe We know much more about how $sqrt 2$ behaves algebraically in relation to the rational numbers than we do $pi$ and $e$.
              – Arthur
              Nov 9 at 12:07










            • @MichaelHoppe A given point $c$ belongs to a line with rational coefficients if and only if some circle with centre $r$ includes at least two rational points. (Proof of the left-to-right implication: take a circle going through any rational point not on the line; then the mirror image of the point also belongs to the circle.) However, it is crucial here that the radius of the circle is not fixed. Almost all circles with a given centre actually contain no rational points at all.
              – Emil Jeřábek
              Nov 9 at 12:25








            • 1




              @EmilJeřábek Also, I think your comment is the first mention on this page of the fact that there exist circles with center $(pi,e)$ with no rational points on them.
              – Jeppe Stig Nielsen
              Nov 9 at 14:00













            up vote
            13
            down vote










            up vote
            13
            down vote









            As comments imply, it is possible to have a point on the circle, and the other answer implies we can't have three. Let me complement this by saying that existence of a circle with this center with two rational points is an open problem.



            Indeed, two points $P,Q$ lie on some circle centered at $(e,pi)$ iff this point lies on the perpendicular bisector of the interval $PQ$. This line has an equation with rational coefficients, and conversely every line with rational coefficients is a bisector of some segment with rational endpoints. Therefore two points can lie on such a circle iff we can have a rational solution to the equation $ae+bpi+c=0$. This, as you can imagine, is widely believed to not be possible, but it's still open - indeed, we don't even know whether $e/pi$ is rational, and if it were, we could even have a relation above with $c=0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            As comments imply, it is possible to have a point on the circle, and the other answer implies we can't have three. Let me complement this by saying that existence of a circle with this center with two rational points is an open problem.



            Indeed, two points $P,Q$ lie on some circle centered at $(e,pi)$ iff this point lies on the perpendicular bisector of the interval $PQ$. This line has an equation with rational coefficients, and conversely every line with rational coefficients is a bisector of some segment with rational endpoints. Therefore two points can lie on such a circle iff we can have a rational solution to the equation $ae+bpi+c=0$. This, as you can imagine, is widely believed to not be possible, but it's still open - indeed, we don't even know whether $e/pi$ is rational, and if it were, we could even have a relation above with $c=0$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Nov 9 at 12:01









            Wojowu

            16.8k22463




            16.8k22463












            • There should be another reason. It can easily be shown that the only point with rational coordinates on the circle centered in $(sqrt2,sqrt2)$ with radius $2$ is the origin.
              – Michael Hoppe
              Nov 9 at 12:06








            • 5




              @MichaelHoppe We know much more about how $sqrt 2$ behaves algebraically in relation to the rational numbers than we do $pi$ and $e$.
              – Arthur
              Nov 9 at 12:07










            • @MichaelHoppe A given point $c$ belongs to a line with rational coefficients if and only if some circle with centre $r$ includes at least two rational points. (Proof of the left-to-right implication: take a circle going through any rational point not on the line; then the mirror image of the point also belongs to the circle.) However, it is crucial here that the radius of the circle is not fixed. Almost all circles with a given centre actually contain no rational points at all.
              – Emil Jeřábek
              Nov 9 at 12:25








            • 1




              @EmilJeřábek Also, I think your comment is the first mention on this page of the fact that there exist circles with center $(pi,e)$ with no rational points on them.
              – Jeppe Stig Nielsen
              Nov 9 at 14:00


















            • There should be another reason. It can easily be shown that the only point with rational coordinates on the circle centered in $(sqrt2,sqrt2)$ with radius $2$ is the origin.
              – Michael Hoppe
              Nov 9 at 12:06








            • 5




              @MichaelHoppe We know much more about how $sqrt 2$ behaves algebraically in relation to the rational numbers than we do $pi$ and $e$.
              – Arthur
              Nov 9 at 12:07










            • @MichaelHoppe A given point $c$ belongs to a line with rational coefficients if and only if some circle with centre $r$ includes at least two rational points. (Proof of the left-to-right implication: take a circle going through any rational point not on the line; then the mirror image of the point also belongs to the circle.) However, it is crucial here that the radius of the circle is not fixed. Almost all circles with a given centre actually contain no rational points at all.
              – Emil Jeřábek
              Nov 9 at 12:25








            • 1




              @EmilJeřábek Also, I think your comment is the first mention on this page of the fact that there exist circles with center $(pi,e)$ with no rational points on them.
              – Jeppe Stig Nielsen
              Nov 9 at 14:00
















            There should be another reason. It can easily be shown that the only point with rational coordinates on the circle centered in $(sqrt2,sqrt2)$ with radius $2$ is the origin.
            – Michael Hoppe
            Nov 9 at 12:06






            There should be another reason. It can easily be shown that the only point with rational coordinates on the circle centered in $(sqrt2,sqrt2)$ with radius $2$ is the origin.
            – Michael Hoppe
            Nov 9 at 12:06






            5




            5




            @MichaelHoppe We know much more about how $sqrt 2$ behaves algebraically in relation to the rational numbers than we do $pi$ and $e$.
            – Arthur
            Nov 9 at 12:07




            @MichaelHoppe We know much more about how $sqrt 2$ behaves algebraically in relation to the rational numbers than we do $pi$ and $e$.
            – Arthur
            Nov 9 at 12:07












            @MichaelHoppe A given point $c$ belongs to a line with rational coefficients if and only if some circle with centre $r$ includes at least two rational points. (Proof of the left-to-right implication: take a circle going through any rational point not on the line; then the mirror image of the point also belongs to the circle.) However, it is crucial here that the radius of the circle is not fixed. Almost all circles with a given centre actually contain no rational points at all.
            – Emil Jeřábek
            Nov 9 at 12:25






            @MichaelHoppe A given point $c$ belongs to a line with rational coefficients if and only if some circle with centre $r$ includes at least two rational points. (Proof of the left-to-right implication: take a circle going through any rational point not on the line; then the mirror image of the point also belongs to the circle.) However, it is crucial here that the radius of the circle is not fixed. Almost all circles with a given centre actually contain no rational points at all.
            – Emil Jeřábek
            Nov 9 at 12:25






            1




            1




            @EmilJeřábek Also, I think your comment is the first mention on this page of the fact that there exist circles with center $(pi,e)$ with no rational points on them.
            – Jeppe Stig Nielsen
            Nov 9 at 14:00




            @EmilJeřábek Also, I think your comment is the first mention on this page of the fact that there exist circles with center $(pi,e)$ with no rational points on them.
            – Jeppe Stig Nielsen
            Nov 9 at 14:00










            up vote
            6
            down vote













            There is at most one rational point on that circle, assuming $pi, e$ and $1$ are linearly independent over $Bbb Q$ (which seems to be an open problem).



            A rational point $(p, q)$ on the circle means that there is a real number $r$ such that
            $$
            (p-pi)^2 + (q-e)^2 = r^2
            $$

            If there is another rational point $(s, t)$ on that same circle, then we also have
            $$
            (s-pi)^2 + (t-e)^2 = r^2
            $$

            giving us
            $$
            (p-pi)^2 + (q-e)^2 =(s-pi)^2 + (t-e)^2\
            underbrace{(2s-2p)pi}_{text{rational multiple of }pi} + underbrace{(2t-2q)e}_{text{rational multiple of }e} + underbrace{p^2 - s^2 + q^2 - t^2}_{text{rational multiple of }1} = 0
            $$

            That the two points are distinct implies the three braced terms are not all zero, meaning $pi, e$ and $1$ are linearly dependent over $Bbb Q$.






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 1




              Related: math.stackexchange.com/a/832636/114910
              – Burnsba
              Nov 9 at 14:14















            up vote
            6
            down vote













            There is at most one rational point on that circle, assuming $pi, e$ and $1$ are linearly independent over $Bbb Q$ (which seems to be an open problem).



            A rational point $(p, q)$ on the circle means that there is a real number $r$ such that
            $$
            (p-pi)^2 + (q-e)^2 = r^2
            $$

            If there is another rational point $(s, t)$ on that same circle, then we also have
            $$
            (s-pi)^2 + (t-e)^2 = r^2
            $$

            giving us
            $$
            (p-pi)^2 + (q-e)^2 =(s-pi)^2 + (t-e)^2\
            underbrace{(2s-2p)pi}_{text{rational multiple of }pi} + underbrace{(2t-2q)e}_{text{rational multiple of }e} + underbrace{p^2 - s^2 + q^2 - t^2}_{text{rational multiple of }1} = 0
            $$

            That the two points are distinct implies the three braced terms are not all zero, meaning $pi, e$ and $1$ are linearly dependent over $Bbb Q$.






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 1




              Related: math.stackexchange.com/a/832636/114910
              – Burnsba
              Nov 9 at 14:14













            up vote
            6
            down vote










            up vote
            6
            down vote









            There is at most one rational point on that circle, assuming $pi, e$ and $1$ are linearly independent over $Bbb Q$ (which seems to be an open problem).



            A rational point $(p, q)$ on the circle means that there is a real number $r$ such that
            $$
            (p-pi)^2 + (q-e)^2 = r^2
            $$

            If there is another rational point $(s, t)$ on that same circle, then we also have
            $$
            (s-pi)^2 + (t-e)^2 = r^2
            $$

            giving us
            $$
            (p-pi)^2 + (q-e)^2 =(s-pi)^2 + (t-e)^2\
            underbrace{(2s-2p)pi}_{text{rational multiple of }pi} + underbrace{(2t-2q)e}_{text{rational multiple of }e} + underbrace{p^2 - s^2 + q^2 - t^2}_{text{rational multiple of }1} = 0
            $$

            That the two points are distinct implies the three braced terms are not all zero, meaning $pi, e$ and $1$ are linearly dependent over $Bbb Q$.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            There is at most one rational point on that circle, assuming $pi, e$ and $1$ are linearly independent over $Bbb Q$ (which seems to be an open problem).



            A rational point $(p, q)$ on the circle means that there is a real number $r$ such that
            $$
            (p-pi)^2 + (q-e)^2 = r^2
            $$

            If there is another rational point $(s, t)$ on that same circle, then we also have
            $$
            (s-pi)^2 + (t-e)^2 = r^2
            $$

            giving us
            $$
            (p-pi)^2 + (q-e)^2 =(s-pi)^2 + (t-e)^2\
            underbrace{(2s-2p)pi}_{text{rational multiple of }pi} + underbrace{(2t-2q)e}_{text{rational multiple of }e} + underbrace{p^2 - s^2 + q^2 - t^2}_{text{rational multiple of }1} = 0
            $$

            That the two points are distinct implies the three braced terms are not all zero, meaning $pi, e$ and $1$ are linearly dependent over $Bbb Q$.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 9 at 12:34

























            answered Nov 9 at 12:01









            Arthur

            108k7103186




            108k7103186








            • 1




              Related: math.stackexchange.com/a/832636/114910
              – Burnsba
              Nov 9 at 14:14














            • 1




              Related: math.stackexchange.com/a/832636/114910
              – Burnsba
              Nov 9 at 14:14








            1




            1




            Related: math.stackexchange.com/a/832636/114910
            – Burnsba
            Nov 9 at 14:14




            Related: math.stackexchange.com/a/832636/114910
            – Burnsba
            Nov 9 at 14:14


















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2991207%2frational-points-on-a-circle-with-centre-as-pi-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            鏡平學校

            ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

            Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?